LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism
Cyrus Redding:
Fifty Years’ Recollections, Literary and Personal
  Indexes


EDITORS’ PREFACE
PERSONS INDEX
LETTERS AND DOCUMENTS
TITLES INDEX
DOCUMENT INFORMATION

contents:
Preface
Vol. I Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II.
Chapter III.
Chapter IV.
Chapter V.
Chapter VI.
Chapter VII.
Chapter VIII.
Chapter IX.
Chapter X.
Vol. II Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II.
Chapter III.
Chapter IV.
Chapter V.
Chapter VI.
Chapter VII.
Chapter VIII.
Vol. III Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II.
Chapter III.
Chapter IV.
Chapter V.
Chapter VI.
Chapter VII.
Chapter VIII.
Chapter IX.
Chapter X.
DOWNLOAD XML

Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
Cyrus Redding is remembered as the biographer of Thomas Campbell, his co-editor at the New Monthly Magazine in the 1820s. He also edited the first collected editions of the poems of Shelley and Keats, published in a Galignani edition of 1829. To his contemporaries he was best-known for his writings on wine, particularly A History and Description of Modern Wines (1833), the first important book on the subject in English. (There was a sequel, Every Man his own Butler, 1839). Redding regarded himself as a poet and political journalist but he was a literary jack-of-all-trades.
He was born in Cornwall in 1785, the son of a well-to-do Baptist minister, and attended the grammar school in Truro before beginning as a journalist in London in 1806. He edited the Plymouth Chronicle from 1808 to 1814 and, in France from 1815 to 1818, he edited Galignani’s Messenger while writing as a correspondent for the Hunts’ Examiner. From 1821 to 1830 he edited the New Monthly Magazine with Campbell, and then, briefly, the Metropolitan Magazine. From 1834 to 1840 he edited the Bath Guardian and the Staffordshire Examiner, Liberal party organs, before returning to London where he edited the English Journal and the London Journal, both of which failed. Cast adrift by the politicians he served, Redding drifted into obscurity, selling his library and moving to the country—where, he does not say. In 1870 he died in London where for some time he had received a small civil-list pension.
Cyrus Redding was a literary figure of the second or third order, nor does his autobiography cast him in a particularly attractive light as a writer or as a person. But he was an acute observer with a very wide circle of acquaintance as befits a journalist, and when he takes the trouble, as he seldom does in the Recollections, he could write well enough. Though associated with the Examiner he was a party man rather than a coterie poet; Campbell aside, he seems to have had few if any close friendships. One suspects that he was close to his family, if only because he makes absolutely no mention in the memoir of the wife to whom he was married for nearly six decades. Redding never met Byron.
As memoirs go, Fifty Years’ Recollections is a very ugly duckling, a crazy-quilt of anecdote, reflection, character-sketch, and travel-journal. It seems to have been written haphazardly, with material as likely to be interjected where it occurred in the course of composition as in the sequence of the narrative. The first volume is desultory but not unreasonable; in the second Redding begins recasting material from previously-published memoirs, resulting in gaps and repetitions; when that is exhausted early in the third volume (the point at which his career stalled) he resorts to book-padding of the worst sort. But there are passages of interest throughout, and while the strokes are rough, Redding’s pen-portraits of Plymouth during the war and France afterwards are striking.
What gives the Recollections particular value is the depth and extent of the persons discussed and described, hundreds of them, in many walks of life. This is the upside to Redding’s desultory mode of composition: in his very lack of selection and tendency to wander he describes much that would otherwise have gone unremarked. Campbell aside, Redding does not have much of interest to say about the characters of major literary figures, but his gallery of literary understrappers, country lawyers and city politicians, dissolute clergymen, naval officers, cast-off courtiers, and political refugees is quite remarkable.
So too is the character of an author who seems like a reincarnation of Swift’s Gulliver. A great traveler and a seasoned cosmopolitan, Redding has few loyalties to persons or places; perpetually busy about a shifting series of projects, he offers opinions about Greek philology, fine art, constitutional law, Balkan politics, crop-management. He excoriates the Tories for their bellicosity and proposes improvements to gun-carriages. His great hero is Napoleon, but for all his strident whiggery he can admire Wellington, Canning, and Peel. Like Gulliver, he is completely unselfconscious about his inconsistencies, now extolling the popular voice and now abusing the ignorant masses. He assails Southey for clinging to an indefensible past while lashing the degeneracy of the times with all the gusto of a Tory satirist; he mocks the Church for superstition and indulges in speculations about ghosts and spirits. He is dazzled by William Beckford’s opulence without troubling himself about its origins in West-Indian slavery.
Redding’s political prejudices are another source of credulity: his readiness to believe that George III was secretly married to Hannah Lightfoot renders him vulnerable to a hoaxing letter, and he reprints fantastic libels against the Tory MP Peter Borthwick, libels for which he had been tried and found guilty twenty years before. Other prejudices seem less forgivable, such as his distaste for women writers and spite for professional rivals. But as with Gulliver it is hard not to feel sympathy for a man as much sinned against as sinning.
His literary prejudices are of interest if only for their congruence with Byron’s. Campbell and Rogers, not Scott and Byron, are the objects of his admiration and he heaps scorn on the egotism of Wordsworth and the Lake Poets. Despite his personal connections with the Hunt circle he mocks Charles Lamb for his insularity and opines that the London Magazine, having been written by and for a coterie, was bound to fail. He dislikes its editor John Scott and shares Campbell’s distaste for Hazlitt. This is hard to account for apart from professional rivalry. One hardly expects him to boast of John Wilson’s friendship or to laud Maga’s D. M. Moir as a great poet, but so he does. John Keats, whose poems Redding had edited, is not once mentioned, perhaps because the memoirist had fallen out with Leigh Hunt.
Cyrus Redding’s contrarian streak runs deep and may have hindered his professional advancement: “I never coaxed, nor flattered, nor lied, nor persevered in pestering those who have in their hands the good things of this life—my services were rendered too sincerely and too independently” (3:379). While he refrains from lashing out at the politicians who left him high and dry (for Redding party loyalty is the essence of political principle) it is all too apparent that he was a bitter and disappointed man; the rambling 150-page rant that concludes his memoir is painful to read.
Despite it all, the Recollections was well received by reviewers who valued Redding’s rich store of anecdote and gossip about times past and a second edition was issued only a few months after the first. While the prefaces to both editions are dated from London, one wonders whether the author was really on hand to oversee their production. The third volume of the first edition was obviously not corrected for the press: it contains, in addition to the general carelessness with names and sloppiness of composition, egregious compositor’s errors. In a few places where the text is incomprehensible it is corrected in the present version from the second edition. The first is preferred as containing material later cut, including a letter from Pierce Egan that is one of the better things in the Recollections. The second edition, like the first, lacks an index; while the text was reset the book was published without a table of contents.

David Hill Radcliffe