THE MORNING POST.
No. 16,808.
|
WEDNESDAY, November 3, 1824.
|
Price 7d.
|
THE ODE ON SIR JOHN MOORE.
A CARD.
A Lady presents her best compliments to the Editor of
the Morning Post, and
begs to inform him, that the Ode on Sir John Moore, praised by Lord Byron, and ascribed to him by Captain Medwin, is, from all
appearances, but a sorry production, and a clear proof that Lord Byron was no critic, although occasionally a pleasing
Poet. A more confused heap of images were never huddled together before, than the same Ode
contains. Look, Mr. Editor, at men digging graves with bayonets,
while all the pioneers of the army were present with proper implements. “Mr. Wolfe was the first to visit
the grave of Moore,” says Mr. Sidney Taylor—The columns of the Morning Post for 1820, I think, will prove
to the contrary.—In that year, some very beautiful lines appeared in the Morning Post, by a Gentleman (now in
France), and he wrote them with a pencil, sitting on the very grave of Sir John Moore
—not when he was killed, although the Gentleman was there at the time, but
after Corunna had been opened to British ships of war, by the victories of Wellington. This was several years
before Mr. Wolfe showed his Ode to
Mr. Taylor in 1814, consequently
Mr. Taylor is wrong, when he says
Mr. Wolfe was the first who visited the
tomb of Moore.
Your insertion of this note will much oblige a friend of the absent Officer who
was the first to write on the grave of Moore.
George-street, Hanover-square, Tuesday morning.
John Sydney Taylor,
“Lord Byron and the late Rev. Charles Wolfe” in Morning Chronicle
No. 17,327 (29 October 1824)
It would no doubt be interesting to the public to know the fortunes and the fate
of one so qualified for distinction, but whose name accident alone seems to have rescued from
total obscurity. His tale is simple and melancholy. He was, I believe, a native of the County
Kildare, in Ireland, and had been sent over to this country early, by some of his friends, and
educated as Winchester College, preparatory to his entrance in the University of Dublin. His
classical attainments distinguished him when very young. The facility and elegance with which
he wrote Latin verse excited admiration. With most boys it is a mechanical labour, and it is
indeed absurd to make it a general practice at our schools. But the mind of
Wolfe was keenly sensitive of the charms of the Augustan Age of
Composition. He was such a master of Latin expression, and had so much of the spirit of the
Bard in him, that his thoughts shaped themselves with a grace and vigour, like those of his
native tongue, into the language of the Roman Muse. But he only wrote to comply with the forms
of an examination. He had also oratorical powers in an eminent degree. His style was original,
imaginative, and vigorous, and he was voted the gold medal, which was the highest honour for
eloquence in the Historical Society of Trinity College—that institution which trained
such as Grattan, Hood, Burgh, Curran, and
Plunkett, for the contentions of public life, and
which the intolerance of a Minister, and the bigotry of a Provost, conspired to destroy, to
prevent the diffusion of too much liberality among the educated youth of Ireland. In the exact
sciences Wolfe made the very first character in his under-graduated
course. On taking his degree, he had no prospect so inviting to look to in the world as that
which was likely to arise from academic promotion. His friends pressed him to secure an
independence by reading for a fellowship. No doubt was entertained that a moderate period of
steady industry would carry him with eclat through the very severe examination which the
candidate for that office must undergo in the College of Dublin, where the course extends to
every branch of moral and mathematical science. He commenced his studies, and gave them for
some time the intense application which is absolutely requisite, and by which the most vigorous
constitutions are often impaired. Wolfe seemed to be endowed with both
strength and talent to ensure the most brilliant success, yet, after a time, his industry
visibly relaxed. His books were only taken up at intervals; read with something like distaste,
and laid aside without regret. It was soon understood, or imagined, that the mind of the
mathematician had been subdued by the heart of the poet. He was said to give himself up to
softer inspirations than those of science. He was observed to enjoy a moonlight walk more then
the calculation of the lunar mountains, and to derive more pleasure from the perusal of the
romantic devotion of Abelard and Eloise, than he
ever received from the philosophy of Reid or the fluxions
at Newton. His health declined; his spirits became
depressed, it was suspected that he indulged a passion, which, though of the most honourable
nature, was likely to lead to hopeless disappointment. However that may he, he lost all taste
for a fellowship, which according to the absurd and monastic statutes of the University, is
incompatible with the matrimonial state, though not with that of concubinage, which such laws seem expressly framed to encourage, and
thereby prevent the seats of learning from the fame of too high a character for morality.
Wolfe renounced the unsocial obligation; he closed his books, which
might lead to wealth and distinction, but not to happiness, and never returned to the path of
academic ambition. He soon after entered the church, and accepted a curacy in the North of
Ireland, in a poor and populous neighbourhood, where he devoted himself with the most singular
assiduity to the duties of his ministry, unlike many who enjoy the fruits of the vine-yard
without contributing to its cultivation. He partook of none of the luxuries, sat in none of the
sunshine of the modern Sion; but, wherever there was sorrow to be assuaged, misery to he
relieved, consolation to be administered, there he was to be found. His zeal, unaffected
benevolence, and freedom from every thing like clerical ambition, made him realize Goldsmith’s clergyman, in all but the internal happiness
which the latter is said to have enjoyed. Labouring for the welfare of the poor and friendless
who were under his charge, and continually traversing the bogs and mountains of a dreary region
in the pursuit of the objects of his charity, his frame, naturally vigorous and robust, at
length bore the visible traces of the wasting of deep and silent sorrow, and incessant
exertion. Residing in another country, I had not seen him for some time; but every account
which I heard of him bore testimony to the life of active usefulness, but gradual martyrdom,
which he had chosen. The melancholy predictions of his friends were too soon accomplished;
about two years ago I heard that death had closed the story of his misfortunes, his talents,
and his virtues. I could not omit this opportunity of vindicating the name of a man so
deserving of honour and regret-of giving to his memory the fame so justly his due—I could
not allow the one solitary but everlasting laurel which ought to ornament his urn to be torn
from the tomb of his departed genius; what could enhance the reputation of Byron, would be capable of conferring distinction an any Poet. It
is also right that the Public should know who it really was that visited, with the homage of
the finest inspiration, the neglected grave of the gallant Moore, and consecrated it with Poetic glory.—I am, Sir, your humble
servant, . . .
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.