The Life and Letters of John Gibson Lockhart
        Chapter 18: 1837-43
        John Gibson Lockhart to Henry Hart Milman, 17 January 1843
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
       
      
      
      
      
     
     
    
     “January 17, 1843. 
    
     “My dear Milman,—I am
                                    exceedingly vexed to find that the sheets containing your article on Macaulay are not printed
                                    off—for the gross insult to Croker
                                    in his new article on Madame
                                        d’Arblay makes it very difficult for me to sanction the
                                    publication of your eulogies on the perpetrator. The detection of the imposture
                                    about F. Burney’s age was made in
                                    the Quarterly
                                            Review, as you know. Can the editor allow his contributor
                                    to be thus handled, and then caress the enemy? Would not ![]()
                                    Croker have reason to complain of me as deserting the
                                    soldier of my own flag? 
    
     “Do not suppose that I blame Macaulay for criticising Croker in regard to that affair; but it might
                                    have been done in the style of a gentleman. It is done in a style of low,
                                    vulgar rancour and injustice. 
    
     “Nor, on the other hand, do I wish to take credit
                                    for any special tenderness of feeling towards Croker. I think he has, of late especially, not treated
                                        Murray and myself at all well in the
                                    concerns of the Quarterly Review. But he is at least one of our most
                                    prominent hands; and can we continue to accept his assistance without giving
                                    him some right to reclaim against the appearance, at this moment, of such a
                                    paper as yours? Make the case your own. Suppose such an attack on you, from so
                                    distinguished a quarter, for what you had written in the Quarterly Review some years ago. Suppose you
                                    had been assailed by Blomfield, or
                                        Whately, or Sydney Smith; and suppose it to be felt that
                                    the odium ecclesiasticum had been
                                    mainly excited by your use of the Quarterly Review against doctrines or tenets or Church
                                    parties espoused by such an assailant as one of these. 
    
     “There is another difficulty which I must state. I
                                    never received any civility from Peel in
                                    the line of patronage but once—when he took office in 1834.1 Croker then
                                    called here and said Peel was anxious 
1 In 1838 Lockhart, writing to Mr.
                                                Cadell, described Peel as “the greatest Reformer in heart, and
                                                the ablest in head, of his period.”   | 
                                    ![]()
| 216 |  LIFE OF J. G. LOCKHART.  |   | 
 to know if Murray
                                    and I had anything to suggest to the new Minister for the department of
                                    Literature and Science. Murray said he wished there could
                                    be a pension for Mrs. Somerville. I
                                    expressed my anxiety (Murray heartily concurring) that you
                                    might have some London preferment, if possible a prebend, in order to break the
                                    force of a prejudice which at that time seemed so strong as to make your
                                    advancement in the Church improbable, unless something were done effectually to
                                    discountenance it; and secundo, that Crabbe’s son might get a Crown living in place of his
                                    curacy. Now all these three things were done, and that almost immediately; and
                                    next time I saw Lord Lyndhurst, which was at
                                    a drawing-room or levee, he said to me, ‘You are a pretty
                                        fellow—I find your man Crabbe
                                        is a keen Whig, if not a Radical, and he has got his living.’ He
                                    laughed heartily; and when I told him I had not doubted that he would like the
                                    opportunity of serving so good a man, the son of such a father, all the better
                                    for his being of the opposite colour, he laughed the more. I have no similar
                                    evidence to connect your prebend with Croker’s
                                    intermediation. Perhaps you know that other and not less
                                    efficient machinery was worked in your behalf. But I thought I must state what
                                    I knew of the affair at this moment, and I am sure you will consider the
                                    statement as worthy of your candid reflection under all the
                                    circumstances.—Ever affectionately yours, 
    
    
    
    Frances D'Arblay  [née Burney]   (1752-1840)  
                  English novelist, the daughter of the musicologist Dr. Charles Burney; author of 
Evelina; or, The History of a Young Lady's Entrance into the World
                        (1778), 
Cecilia, or Memoirs of an Heiress (1782), and 
Camilla (1796).
               
 
    Robert Cadell  (1788-1849)  
                  Edinburgh bookseller who partnered with Archibald Constable, whose daughter Elizabeth he
                        married in 1817. After Constable's death and the failure of Ballantyne he joined with Scott
                        to purchase rights to the 
Waverley Novels.
               
 
    John Singleton Copley, baron Lyndhurst  (1772-1863)  
                  The son of the American painter; he did legal work for John Murray before succeeding Lord
                        Eldon as lord chancellor (1827-30, 1834-35, 1841-46); a skilled lawyer, he was also a
                        political chameleon.
               
 
    George Crabbe  (1754-1832)  
                  English poet renowned for his couplet verse and gloomy depictions of country persons and
                        places; author of the 
The Village (1783), 
The
                            Parish Register (1807), 
The Borough (1810), and 
Tales of the Hall (1819).
               
 
    
    John Wilson Croker  (1780-1857)  
                  Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the 
Quarterly
                            Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's 
Life of
                            Johnson (1831).
               
 
    John Gibson Lockhart  (1794-1854)  
                  Editor of the 
Quarterly Review (1825-1853); son-in-law of Walter
                        Scott and author of the 
Life of Scott 5 vols (1838).
               
 
    
    Henry Hart Milman  (1791-1868)  
                  Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford, he was a poet, historian and dean of St
                        Paul's (1849) who wrote for the 
Quarterly Review.
               
 
    John Murray II  (1778-1843)  
                  The second John Murray began the 
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
                        published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
               
 
    
    Sydney Smith  (1771-1845)  
                  Clergyman, wit, and one of the original projectors of the 
Edinburgh
                            Review; afterwards lecturer in London and one of the Holland House
                        denizens.
               
 
    Mary Somerville  [née Fairfax]   (1780-1872)  
                  Mathematician and science writer, daughter of Admiral William George Fairfax (1739-1813)
                        and friend of Ada Byron; she spent her later years in Italy. She was twice married.
               
 
    Richard Whately, archbishop of Dublin  (1787-1863)  
                  The nephew of the Shakespeare critic Thomas Whately (d. 1772); he was educated at Oriel
                        College, Oxford where he was professor of political economy (1829-31) and was archbishop of
                        Dublin (1831-63). A prolific writer, he offered a rationalist defense of
                        Anglicanism.
               
 
    
                  The Quarterly Review.    (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the 
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
                        Scott as a Tory rival to the 
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
                        William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.