The Life and Letters of John Gibson Lockhart
        Chapter 18: 1837-43
        John Gibson Lockhart to Henry Hart Milman, 4 October 1840
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
       
      
      
      
      
     
     
    
     “Milton, October 4, 1840. 
    
     “My dear Milman,—Thanks for your seria
                                            mixta jocis. I believe I must cut ecclesiastical things
                                    entirely—it is so very hard to keep the peace among my reverend allies:
                                    but I think I altered nothing in your last article, though I omitted a few
                                    things, and italicised one or two of the quotations; and I am sure you will own
                                    that if the article were to be in the same number with that on Tom Carlyle, this was as little as
                                    the Editor could do in the way of manipulation, and most assuredly I took a
                                    hundred times more liberty with the Oxonian,1 wherefore
                                    his jobation is yet to come. He has spent these three months past in Ireland,
                                    and is still there. . . . I expect that his lucubrations will be highly curious and
                                    interesting, as regards the prime object of his study, viz., the actual state
                                    and system of the Romish clergy, and I hope that this study will be found 
                                    ![]()
| 190 |  LIFE OF J. G. LOCKHART.  |   | 
 to have much qualified his general theory as to the
                                    legitimate scope of ecclesiastical authority. It would be a lamentable thing
                                    for me to lose him. I seriously think him one of the greatest writers now
                                    going; and even Croker expresses
                                    admiration pure and unmixed of his last paper, though he is as far as you are,
                                    perhaps, from the New Mania; but I am thoroughly alive to the danger of the
                                    case, and extremely obliged to you for all your hints. 
    
     “Of the nine poetesses1 only one has written in acknowledgment—and perhaps she is
                                    the best of them, ‘V——.’ She says that ‘all her good has
                                        come on her at once,’ for she never ‘hoped’ either to
                                    be praised in the Quarterly Review, or to get a husband, and that both this article and a proposal
                                        ‘reached her in the same week.’ I expect cake.
                                        H. B. must not make her the Terpsichore of the choir. 
    
     “I am sorry John
                                        Murray has not sent you the Memoirs you wanted—pray,
                                            en attendant, give us a short
                                    article on the French tract you mention—but can I not persuade you to
                                    buckle to Juvenal and Persius? You only have to assume the truth as to
                                    the profound ignorance of the public, and make free use of the best bits of
                                        Dryden, Gifford, Drummond,
                                    &c, &c, and throw off a fine rhapsody on Satire—Greek, Roman,
                                    Italian, French, and English—and you can’t fail to produce a most
                                    entertaining, instructive, and really valuable article.
                                        
                                    ![]()
                                    Gifford’s notes are capital material, many of them,
                                    both for extract and in the way of suggestion. Hallam has shown, as well as yourself heretofore, how new such
                                    old things may be made to appear under the treatment of a vigorous hand
                                    thoroughly mistress of the craft. Another favourite scheme of mine for you has
                                    been ‘Ovid.’” 
    
    Archer Clive  (1800-1878)  
                  Educated at Harrow and Brasenose College, Oxford, he was rector of Solihull in
                        Warwickshire (1829-47); in 1840 he married the writer Caroline Meysey-Wigley.
               
 
    Caroline Clive  [née Wigley]   (1801-1873)  
                  English poet and novelist who married the Reverend Archer Clive in 1840; she enjoyed
                        enduring success with her books 
IX Poems by V (1840) and 
Paul Ferroll: a Tale (1855), the later a sensation-novel.
               
 
    John Wilson Croker  (1780-1857)  
                  Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the 
Quarterly
                            Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's 
Life of
                            Johnson (1831).
               
 
    Sir William Drummond  (1770 c.-1828)  
                  Scottish classical scholar and Tory MP; succeeded Lord Elgin as ambassador to the Ottoman
                        Porte (1803); his 
Oedipus judaicus, in which he interpreted the Old
                        Testament as an astrological allegory, was privately printed in 1811.
               
 
    John Dryden  (1631-1700)  
                  English poet laureate, dramatist, and critic; author of 
Of Dramatick
                            Poesie (1667), 
Absalom and Achitophel (1681), 
Alexander's Feast; or the Power of Musique (1697), 
The Works of Virgil translated into English Verse (1697), and 
Fables (1700).
               
 
    William Gifford  (1756-1826)  
                  Poet, scholar, and editor who began as a shoemaker's apprentice; after Oxford he
                        published 
The Baviad (1794), 
The Maeviad
                        (1795), and 
The Satires of Juvenal translated (1802) before becoming
                        the founding editor of the 
Quarterly Review (1809-24).
               
 
    Henry Hallam  (1777-1859)  
                  English historian and contributor to the 
Edinburgh Review, author
                        of 
Introduction to the Literature of Europe, 4 vols (1837-39) and
                        other works. He was the father of Tennyson's Arthur Hallam.
               
 
    Juvenal  (110 AD fl.)  
                  Roman satirist noted, in contrast to Horace, for his angry manner.
               
 
    Henry Hart Milman  (1791-1868)  
                  Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford, he was a poet, historian and dean of St
                        Paul's (1849) who wrote for the 
Quarterly Review.
               
 
    John Murray II  (1778-1843)  
                  The second John Murray began the 
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
                        published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
               
 
    Persius  (34-62)  
                  Roman poet, the author of six surviving satires.
               
 
    William Sewell  (1804-1874)  
                  English divine; he was tutor at Merton College, Oxford (1831-53) and dean (1839); he
                        wrote for the 
Quarterly Review.
               
 
    
                  The Quarterly Review.    (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the 
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
                        Scott as a Tory rival to the 
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
                        William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.