Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter III
CHAPTER III.
I FIND from old letters that at the end of 1813 I occupied my
leisure in writing a play, which was intended to have some parallel with the uprising of
the German population. My subject was the deliverance of the German nation from the Roman
yoke by Arminius. It is one of the usual mistakes of
young writers to believe that some temporary outburst of popular enthusiasm would ensure
success to a poem, and especially to a drama, which, in the very nature of its subject,
must be little more than a vehicle for rhetorical display. This is easier than to deal with
the great elements of terror and pity, which must largely enter into the composition of a
tragedy as a real work of art. My play was sent to Drury Lane, then managed by a Committee,
of which Mr. Whitbread was a leading member. My
attempt was treated with all respect; it had a fair consideration, and its rejection was
accompanied with a note sufficiently complimentary:—“There is much spirited and
easy writing in this tragedy. Its greatest fault appears to be a want of incident and
contrivance; it is too declamatory; and I apprehend the want of interest and situation
would not be compensated by the neatness and fire of the dialogue.” I had
sense enough to know that the objections thus stated were perfectly just; but I had not
then learnt the lesson
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 153 |
which a critical acquaintance with Shakspere, and with other great dramatists, afterwards
impressed upon me,—that a play unfit for the stage is incapable of imparting true poetical
pleasure in the closet. In such a drama the unity of object is wanting. The action halts.
The descriptive passages are elaborated till the realities of character vanish. I printed
my “Arminius.” The book
had some success, and caused me to be enrolled amongst the poets of England in a Catalogue of Living Authors, and
more permanently in Watt’s “Bibliotheca Britannica.” But
what is the value of such fame? One living rival of Magliabecchi,—whose knowledge of books is as universal as profound, whilst,
unlike Magliabecchi, he is able profitably to use his knowledge,—tells
me that there is not a copy of my play in the British Museum. My vanity is soothed a little
by remembering that one of the scenes is to be found in a school-book of elocution, side by
side with extracts from Addison’s “Cato,” and Brooke’s “Gustavus Vasa.” It is not a great fame.
The third week of the new year witnessed that most unusual occurrence—the
stoppage of communication on some of the most frequented roads of England and Scotland.
There never had been such a fall of snow in the memory of man, and there has certainly been
nothing like it since. Had railways been in existence, the obstacles to all travelling and
all commercial transit would have been precisely the same. It is under such unusual
circumstances of interruption to the business of a busy people that we best understand the
value of roads, and of all the concurrent means of communication which have grown up during
a long period of civilized society. I well
154 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
remember the consternation
and difficulty, when, on a certain Thursday, our morning coaches set out for London and
were obliged to return; when we learnt that the only mails which had reached the General
Post Office on the Friday were three from Brighton, Rye, and Portsmouth; when we knew, from
the report of horsemen and pedestrians, who had contrived to struggle up from Bath, that
the West of England was completely impassable for carriages; that the shops in Exeter were
shut up, and the doors and windows of private houses barricaded, by the drifts of snow. At
Oxford no letters or papers arrived for four days, and there was a blockade far more
effectual than when Cromwell’s army was
hemming it around. I made my way on horseback to the Bath road, and proceeded well enough
from Slough to a mile or so beyond Salthill, through a lane cut through the snow, which
rose on either side like the outer walls of a mediæval castle. This narrow passage had been
accomplished by the exertions of many labourers, and the same process was going forward
throughout the northern and western roads. On the 21st of January a notice was issued from
the General Post Office to all post masters, directing them to apply to the overseers of
parishes to employ all the means in their power to get the country cleared for the passage
of the mails. A more stringent command was issued from the Home Office to the
Lords-Lieutenants of counties, for restoring the accustomed means of communication between
London and the interior. The fall of snow was succeeded by an intense frost. Between
Blackfriars Bridge and London Bridge there was a sort of fair on the ice, which has been
best preserved from oblivion in one of the designs Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 155 |
of George Cruikshank, in Hone’s “Every Day
Book.”
The milder days of February gave us back again the ordinary means of
communication from Cornwall to Lanarkshire. From out of a “House of Glass”
Rumour now came flying all abroad, and the land was alive with the anticipation of great
events. The Allies marched on from the Rhine. Then came the fruitless struggle which
manifested the military genius of Napoleon as much as
any one of his great victories. From one point to another he rushed to meet his enemies
wherever they appeared; sometimes victorious, sometimes defeated, but always contriving to
make the great issue still doubtful. Aberdeen the
peaceful was for making terms with him; other statesmen, English and foreign, were for
pushing him to extremities. The risings of Bordeaux, the second city of the Empire, in
favour of the Bourbons, appeared to indicate that the popular feeling of France was
changing, as regarded him who had done everything for its glory and nothing for its
happiness. The negociations for peace were broken off whilst Wellington was fighting his final battle with Soult on the 10th of April, Paris had capitulated, and the Emperor of Russia and the King
of Prussia had entered the capital which had appropriated the spoils of a
hundred cities. On the 4th of April, Napoleon had abdicated, and soon
after was on his road to Elba. For three nights London was in a tumult of exultation,
amidst illuminations of unprecedented brilliancy. On the 3rd of May, Louis the Eighteenth was in the Tuileries. In England the
beauty of the spring weather was such as had scarcely ever been
156 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
remembered. Poets seized upon it as an omen of future happiness. Leigh Hunt—who had endured enough to render him cold to a cause which was
that of the ruling powers at home and of royalty in general—looked at this crisis as
somewhat like a final triumph over war and oppression, and in his new-born zeal wrote a
Mask, “The Descent of Liberty,”
to which the glories of the spring lent their most poetical associations. We had our
especial turn of patriotic excitement at Windsor. The great festivities in London when the
Emperor of Russia and the King of Prussia arrived; when they were invested with the Order
of the Garter at Carlton House; when the Prince Regent
and the two sovereigns dined with the Corporation of London at the Mansion House;—these
were of little importance to us compared with that of the visit to Windsor of the Emperor
of Russia with his famous Platoff, and of the King
of Prussia with his no less famous Blücher. In the
“Poetical Remains” of
William Sidney Walker, with whom I was
associated in after life, there is a letter from him when a boy at Eton, dated the 6th of
July, 1814, in which he says, “I have shaken hands with the King of Prussia and
Platoff, and have touched the flap of
Blücher’s coat. I shall have it engraven on my
tombstone.” I cannot desire so solemn a record, that, having arrived early at
the Ascot Race-ground, I saw the King of Prussia—who had ridden thither before the rest of
the royal party—buying a penny roll and a slice of cheese at one of the common booths, and
marching up and down, cutting his humble luncheon with a pocketknife which I supposed he
had carried through many a troublous campaign. Nor shall I claim any special Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 157 |
distinction for having looked at Frogmore upon the hard leather
camp-bed upon which the Emperor of Russia slept, preferring it to the state-bed of down
which had been provided for him. The sublime personages went their way, to settle the
affairs of Europe as they best could according to their peculiar desires. After the great
realities of a quarter of a century, the people of London were to be delighted with a
sea-fight of little boats on the Serpentine; with Chinese lanterns and Congreve rockets in
St. James’s Park; with a Temple of Concord, which was a superb enlargement of a
device on a Twelfth Cake; and with somewhat of an approach to an attractive sight in the
conflagration of a temporary bridge over the then muddy canal in the Park, by which
accident a few lives were lost. I saw as much as I could see of the whole affair, and I
must say that even then I thought it very considerably like child’s play. Of coarse I
took a more exalted view of the historical grandeur of this season of rejoicing and
felicitation when the Duke of Wellington was to arrive at Windsor, for
the purpose of reviewing his regiment of the Horse Guards Blue, and I was requested by the
Corporation to write an Address to be presented to his Grace by the Town Clerk. I very much
fear that its stilted paragraphs were a humble imitation of that Address of the Speaker of
the House of Commons, when he said, “This nation well knows that it is largely
your debtor.” The Duke, on the 6th of August, received the Corporation in the
hall of the Castle Inn, somewhat weary, I suppose, of the manner in which, as he said,
“he had been received in different parts of the kingdom.” I crept
into that narrow hall, between the red gowns and the blue 158 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
gowns, some
of whom stood in the street; and I was not very proud of my fine paragraphs when I looked
upon that impassive face, and thinking of what welded iron that conqueror of
Bonaparte was made, fancied how little the men of action
appreciated the sounding periods of the men of words. I did not then know with what success
this great soldier would vindicate his own claim to be ranked amongst the best writers.
For three months England had been putting on her brightest holiday face. It
was one long gala-day. Those who had won the victory, and those who had thrown up their
caps for it, were equally ready to exclaim—
“Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths; Our bruised arms hung up for monuments; Our stern alarums changed to merry meetings; Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.” |
A month had passed since the Duke of Wellington
had banqueted with the officers of his fine regiment; and then the Blues went forth to a
mimic war, of which I was a gratified spectator.
On the 21st of August an official notice was published, that several attempts
had been made to kill the king’s deer in the walks of Windsor Forest, under an
apprehension that the Forest Inclosure Act sanctioned such proceedings. The clause of that
Act which applied to this question of deer-killing was then set forth, to the effect, that
all the lands within the Parishes and Liberties of the Forest—save and except such parts
thereof as are now vested, or shall become vested, in his Majesty—shall be and are, from
and after the 1st of July, 1814, disafforested, and no persons thenceforth shall be
questioned or liable to
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 159 |
punishment for hunting, taking, or destroying
deer within the same. The inclosure of Windsor Forest was perhaps one of the largest
inclosures ever effected under the powers of one Act. The Forest, whose circuit, two
centuries previous, was nearly eighteen miles, though considerably reduced in later years,
comprised at the time of the inclosure the whole of eleven parishes and parts of six other
parishes. The inclosed property of the Crown within the Forest then amounted to about five
thousand acres; that of individual proprietors to about thirty thousand acres; and the open
Forest land to about twenty-five thousand acres. Of this uninclosed portion more than
one-fourth was allotted to the King, as Lord of the Forest and as proprietor of various
manors. After the disafforestation, therefore, large tracts of land beyond the boundaries
of Windsor Great Park were “the wild forest” and “the holts,” or
wooded hills, as described by Lord Surrey in the reign
of Henry the Eighth. Few now read Pope’s “Windsor-Forest,” but he had an eye of true
observation for the characteristics of the scenery amidst which he lived; its lawns and
open glades, its russet plains, its bluish hills, its wild heaths with their purple dyes,
its fruitful fields amidst the desert. In these intermingled scenes of wood and pasturage,
and over the wide heaths covered with gorse and fern, small herds of deer wandered at will,
not dreading the shot of any “Herne the Hunter,” as they sought their evening
lair, and keeping far away from the villages and farms.
In the parish of Bray there was a land-proprietor occupying that middle rank
between the farmer and the gentleman, which was more common at a time when gentility was
not thought worth many sacrifices
160 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
of comfort and independence, by the
older race of cultivators and tradesmen. He was a man of infinite annoyance to all persons
in authority, arguing at vestries and manor-courts with a bold and quaint humour, whose
oddity was heightened by a peculiar snuffle in his voice. He was especially at feud with
the steward of the royal manor in which he lived, who was also the solicitor for the
affairs of the Forest. After the 1st of July this shrewd and eccentric yeoman became the
Robin Hood of the district. He had lieutenants as
daring as Will Scarlet and Little John, with a band of marauders, swift of foot and with the sure aim
of experienced poachers, who chased the deer from parish to parish, whilst justice of peace
and constable looked on with helpless dismay. It was impossible to distinguish the
uninclosed parts allotted to the Crown, although distinctly specified in the awards of the
inclosure, from those parts which were disafforested. It was in vain to proclaim that if
any person killed red or fallow deer in such specified allotments, they would be liable to
the penalties of the Acts to prevent the stealing of deer. Other powers than those of the
law must be resorted to.
In the second week of September strong detachments of the Horse Guards and of
the Fifth Infantry were employed for two days in driving the deer to safe coverts and
fenced inclosures where the marauders could not come. I looked upon this extraordinary
scene from the high ground near Cranbourn, which at this time was the residence of the
Princess Charlotte. Well do I remember her sunny
face, as she almost daily drove a pair of ponies up the steep hill of Windsor, to dine with
the Queen, and then returned to the sequestered mansion in one of the most beau-
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 161 |
tiful spots of the Forest. From its windows she might have looked over
Winkfield Plain, where this extraordinary hunting was going forward. Southern England never
saw such a hunting as this of Cranbourn Woods. The plain below was a field where vast
armies might manœuvre, and there I gazed upon a body of cavalry, stretching from one side
of the plain to the other in the form of a crescent moon, gradually narrowing the circle in
which the frightened deer were driven before them. Occasionally, a buck would make a bold
dash from the rest of the herd, and then a shout would go forth from the unmilitary
horsemen, and there would be an exciting chase till he was driven back, or escaped, or was
killed. Amongst the red-coats and the blue, there was no Douglas ready
to do battle with the Percy, so that this was not a “woful
hunting.” Most of the deer were, after two days, driven to the pens of the
Great Park, or were caught in toils hung up on the trees that skirted the avenues of the
forest. The modern imitators of the outlaws of Sherwood returned to their hovels, to feast
upon less dainty fare than venison; and the leaders would long tell the stories of their
adventurous feats, and rejoice in that strength which had required no less a power than two
regiments of the Crown to subdue it.
My newspaper of the 3rd of December contained a paragraph which I had copied
from “The Times” of November the 29th,
1814, not interesting, perhaps, to the majority of my provincial readers, but which
strongly excited my wonder and curiosity, and led me into obscure speculations of what
might be the probable consequences of what “The
Times” described as “the greatest improvement connected with
print-
162 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
ing since the discovery of the art itself.”
Well knowing the great bodily exertion which up to that time was required of two men
working at the common press, to produce two hundred and fifty impressions of one side of a
newspaper in an hour, I might well be surprised when I read as follows:—“The
reader of this paragraph now holds in his hand one of the many thousand impressions of
‘The Times’ newspaper which were taken off
last night, by a mechanical apparatus. A system of machinery almost organic has been
devised and arranged, which, while it relieves the human frame of its most laborious
efforts in printing, far exceeds all human powers in rapidity and dispatch.”
The process is then briefly described; and it is added, “the whole of these
complicated acts is performed with such a velocity and simultaneousness of movement,
that no less than eleven hundred sheets are impressed in one hour.” The
invention is termed in this announcement “The Printing Machine.” The
inventor’s name was Koenig.
For ten years Mr. Walter, the
proprietor of “The Times,” had been
vainly endeavouring, at a heavy cost, to perfect some machinery by which he could send
forth a greater number than the four thousand copies of his journal which he was able to
produce by the utmost exertion of manual labour. The machine of Koenig was, however, a most complicated affair; expensive, liable to
derangement, and not capable, therefore, of being applied to the general purposes of
printing. In 1823 I read in Scott’s novel of
“Quentin Durward” the
prophetic words of Martivalle, “Can I look
forward without wonder and astonishment to the lot of a succeeding generation, on whom
knowledge shall descend like the first and
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 163 |
second rain,
uninterrupted, unabated, unbounded.” The Printing Press had produced the
first rain; the Printing Machine was the “little cloud no bigger than a
man’s hand” which promised the second rain. There was now some chance
that the steam-engine would accomplish for printing what it was accomplishing for
navigation. In June, 1824, I attended a trial in the Common Pleas, in which the Duke of Northumberland was plaintiff, and my friend,
Mr. Clowes, the defendant. The printer, who
carried on his business in Northumberland Court, had erected a steam-press in his cellar,
the wall of which abutted on the Duke’s princely mansion at Charing Cross. Ludicrous
it was to hear the extravagant terms in which the counsel for the plaintiff and his
witnesses described the alleged nuisance—the noise made by this engine, quite horrid,
sometimes resembling thunder, at other times like a threshing-machine, and then again like
the rumbling of carts and waggons. With surpassing ability was the cause of the defendant
conducted by the Attorney-General (Copley). The course
of the trial is beside my present purpose. Mr.
Donkin, the celebrated engineer, deposed that there were not less than
twenty engines erected for printing in London. Simplifications of the original invention
had rendered the Printing Machine applicable to the production of books as well as
newspapers. The second rain was beginning to descend. In 1814 I was very far from a
conception of the extent in which the invention of the Printing Machine would affect a
future stage in my working life. But in the boundless fertility of that second rain I
anticipated a wider scope for my professional labours. I had incurred new responsibilities,
164 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
and had gained new motives for exertion, in marrying. The
Christmas of that year saw my once solitary home lighted up with love and cheerfulness.
In February, 1815, a Bill was hurried through Parliament which absolutely
closed the ports against the introduction of foreign corn till the price of wheat should
rise to eighty shillings a quarter. I rejoice to see that I was fearless of the indignation
which the Windsor paper, circulating chiefly in an agricultural district, would produce,
when I wrote—“It is hardly fair that the landowner and cultivator should enter
Parliament with such a formidable power as the united voice of the people will scarcely
be able to put down, and there demand that the price of wheat should now be fixed at
the average rate of a time of war. There are many noble lords and right honourable
gentlemen who have doubled their rentals since the year 1794, and there are many very
thrifty agriculturists who have purchased the estates which their fathers only tilled,
and have adjourned, with unsoiled hands, from the oak-chair in the chimney-corner to
the velvet sofa in the drawing-room. Doubtless all this is very agreeable to the
parties themselves, and worldly wisdom will blame no man for preferring 20,000l. to 10,000l., or a hunter and madeira
to a market-cart and ale. But then it is rather galling to be told that all this is
essentially necessary to our existence and prosperity, and to hear it very gravely
asserted that we shall be all the happier and better for being shortly allowed to get
two loaves with the money for which we now purchase three.”
The “hunter and madeira” as contrasted with the
“market-cart and ale” of the old times, was not ungenerously applied
to the generation of Southern
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 165 |
farmers, who had sprung up in the days
of protection and paper currency. From no class of men was the old simplicity of manners so
utterly departed. They were ignorant, to an extent which is now difficult to conceive, of
the improved modes in which agriculture could be made to repay a judicious advance of
capital. It is impossible to measure the contempt with which they regarded what they called
“book-farming.” They applied all their small industry and less knowledge to the
growth of wheat, and when wheat was low in the market they raved about “agricultural
distress.” The tenant-farmer appeared to consider, as much as the Irish cottier
considers, that it was a deadly wrong if a landlord raised his rent, or sought a better
tenant when he beheld his land exhausted, or the growing corn struggling with the rampant
weeds. Their general ignorance of the commonest affairs of the non-agricultural life was
unbounded. There was an elderly man supposed to have made a fortune in dear times, who had
given up his profitable farm when the landlord thought he ought to have some increased
portion of the great benefit that the dear loaf had given to the wheat-grower. He took the
chair at the farmer’s dinner on every market-day at Windsor; his two sons were always
out with the stag-hounds; the pony-chaise of his wife might often be seen at the
draper’s door. The good man was homely enough himself, but his family was
“genteel” and expensive. Their “dolce far
niente” went on for five years. One morning the unhappy head
of the family opened his bureau, and giving his wife a ten-pound note, exclaimed,
“That is the last on ’em.” A subscription was raised to help
him in his destitution; his sons and daughters went to service; 166 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
and he
became a road-surveyor before the days of Macadam, when scientific road-making was as
little understood as scientific farming.
The Corn-Bill was passed amidst the temperate opposition of a few
enlightened statesmen and the violence of an irritated mob. It was to produce its full
measure of evil in the misery and disaffection of the people in 1816 and 1817. All
discussion upon a vital subject of political economy was suddenly interrupted by an event
as unexpected as it was alarming—the landing of Bonaparte in the Gulf of St. Juan, on the 1st of March, 1815. On the 5th of
March—such was the want of means of communication in the days before the Electric
Telegraph—it was not known in Paris that the ex-Emperor had escaped from Elba. On the 20th,
after midnight, Louis the Eighteenth had fled from the
Tuileries, and on the 21st Napoleon was borne up its grand staircase
by an enthusiastic crowd. There were three months of such excitement in England as the
greatest events of the late war had failed to produce. There were alternations of hope and
of fear, of distrust and of confidence, in the Allied Powers. But, whatever had been our
experience in the Peninsular campaigns, there was no very general belief that the military
arm of England would be the most potent in stopping the march to the Rhine of the great
enemy. The kingdom of the Netherlands broken up, Prussia humiliated, we might look to
another period of French domination over Europe. We had our peculiar excitements at
Windsor. The Blues, that a few months before we had seen chasing the red deer in Windsor
Forest, were now called to sterner duties in the forests and plains of Belgium. The
regiment marched from Windsor
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 167 |
on the 30th of April; on the 18th of
June it was doing its part on the field of Waterloo. It is not for me here to follow the
wonderful course of historical events which ended in the abdication of
Napoleon and the second restoration of the Bourbons. The great
Captive had scarcely sailed from Plymouth to his rock in the Atlantic, when thoughtful men
began to feel that the millennium of universal peace and love was not quite close at hand.
France could only be kept quiet by foreign occupation; Spain was trodden down under the
feet of a drivelling idiot called a king; Poland was manacled to Russia; the dream of
Italian independence was at an end when Austria was to rule over four millions of the
Lombardo-Venetian Kingdom. Promises made in the hour of danger had been violated when
Peoples had won safety for Crowns. Twenty years of war appeared to have produced little
real and imperishable good. Such were my thoughts at that crisis, and they were those of
many who would willingly have given themselves up to the general exultation at the prospect
that peace had at last been securely won. Great Britain alone stood in an attitude of
unselfishness at the Congress. She was content only to demand from France the abolition of
the Slave-Trade. The settlement of Europe was effected by the Princes who at the faro-table
of Vienna shuffled and cut for the destinies of the world. The sharers in the spoil might
say with Trinculo, “We steal by line and
level.”
Proud as I was, in common with the majority of the nation, of the great
triumphs of my countrymen, especially in the crowning glory of Waterloo, I was not free
from the apprehension that the ancient constitutional doctrine that the military should be
kept
168 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
in complete subserviency to the civil power, might be less
strictly maintained at a period when the soldier had done so much for his country, and when
the ruling head of the State had displayed a very marked tendency for the pomp and parade
of war, if not for its reality. On the 4th of April, Lord Milton complained in the House of
Commons, that in going through Piccadilly in an open carriage, in which street there were
not ten carnages, he was prevented from passing into one of the side streets, where guards
were placed “in the novel manner that had lately been adopted on
court-days.” The soldier who had interrupted his progress struck his horse, and
said he would strike him too if he persisted in passing. The next day the Earl of Essex made a similar complaint in the House of Lords,
adding, that the soldiers threatened that if he attempted to proceed, they would not only
cut his horse down, but would cut him down too. Lord
Grenville maintained that the practice of employing the military on
court-days was of very modern date; and asserted that if the Earl of
Essex, on being threatened with being cut down, had put the soldier to
death, it must have been pronounced by the law of the land to have been justifiable
homicide; and if, on the contrary, the soldier had used the sword, he would have been
answerable for the blow, even to death itself. Lord
Sidmouth declared that, as Secretary of State, he had no concern in calling
out the soldiery; pledging himself that orders should be issued that no soldier should for
the future act in the preservation of the peace without the guidance and control of the
civil officer. There were circumstances in the aspect of those times which led us to dread
that the separation of the Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 169 |
soldier from the citizen was a shadowy hope
of some would-be imitators of Continental despotism.
The marriage of the Princess
Charlotte with Prince Leopold, on the
2nd of May, 1816, was an event in which I took exceeding interest. It set me poetizing; for
I was somewhat too apt to be moved into writing verse on passing subjects, forgetting that
poetry ought to be almost exclusively conversant with the permanent and universal. My Mask,
“The Bridal of the
Isles,” whatever might have been its defects, was not written in the spirit of
a courtier; for in the Second Canto, in which I called up the shades of the great British
rulers of old, I put these lines in the mouth of Alfred
addressing the Genius of England:—
“O, I have watch’d thy inonarchs as they pass’d,— Now leaping upward to my tempting throne, Now toppling down in hateful civil strife, Or sliding to the slumbers of the tomb; But never saw I one who fill’d that seat In rightful ministration, who might say, ‘This is my couch of ease, my chair of joy, This sceptre is a pleasure-charming rod To call up all fresh luxuries around me.’ The lofty soul, with reverend eye and meek, “Would look upon the trappings of its state As emblems of a fearful trust, that ask’d The smile of Heaven on self-denying virtue. Yes! I will hover round those youthful hearts, Unblighted yet by power—and with a voice Borne on the ear by every morning breeze, Cry—‘Live not for yourselves.’” |
I had a very pleasant, because a very characteristic, letter from Leigh Hunt about this Mask. He complimented me by saying, “It is
very crisp and luxuriant, and shows that you possess in a great degree my favourite
part of the poetical spirit—that
170 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
of enjoyment.” Yes. It
was that spirit of enjoyment which gave Hunt his perennial youth,
amidst worldly troubles as great as most men have endured; which, earned somewhat to
excess, made him almost indifferent to adversity in its stern realities.
“But,” he continued, “I would rather talk with you about these
matters than write about them; for when I get upon poetry I feel my wings on, and do
not like to wait the zig-zag travelling of the pen.” Happy nature! I did not
cultivate his acquaintance as I ought to have done in this fresh time of hope. I knew him
in later years when I was sobered; but when I had not lost the power of enjoyment in his
delightful conversation, so charming—especially to one who was also battling with the
world—in its constant looking at the sunny side of human affairs.
The transition from joy at the auspicious marriage of the Princess Charlotte, to the universal mourning for her
death, was not sudden in point of time, but it nevertheless came upon the nation as an
unexpected blow, suspending all lesser interests of domestic politics. The interval between
May, 1816, and November, 1817, was one of very serious aspects. The Government and the
People were not in accord; suffering and sedition went hand in hand; demagogues flourished;
spies were more than tolerated. Of this unhappy period I shall have to speak in another
chapter. Let me at present advert to some personal experiences at the funeral of the
Princess Charlotte, on Wednesday evening, the 19th of November,
which I thus related in a Supplementary Number of “The Windsor Express,” published on the following
morning. In this narrative I laid aside the usual editorial style, and signed my name
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 171 |
as to facts which I was prepared individually to substantiate:—
“On the morning of Tuesday I received from one of the Canons of the
College of Windsor a ticket of admission to the organ-loft of St. George’s
Chapel, to witness the ceremonial of the late Princess
Charlotte’s interment. This, I was given to understand, was
presented to me by the particular direction of the Dean and Chapter, to allow me to
make a faithful report of the solemnities, and as a compliment to the office of chief
magistrate which my father holds in the borough. At seven o’clock this evening I
claimed an entrance at the outer gate of the lower ward of the Castle, which was kept
by two subalterns of the Foot Guards, and a numerous body of rank and file. Constables
of the borough were also posted here, but they were evidently considered as intruders
upon these unconstitutional guardians of the peace. I was roughly thrust back against
the wheels of the carriages which were passing behind me, and told, in common with many
others who, like myself, had tickets, that no more would be admitted. For an hour I was
buffeted about, with my unfortunate companions, who comprised some of the most
respectable inhabitants of Windsor; sometimes collared by the soldiers, sometimes
jammed against the castle wall, and at all times insulted by dogmatical assertions or
sneering indifference. We at last retired in despair, having risked our lives till
danger was no longer endurable. Ten minutes before the procession entered the gate, I
procured access to one of the officers, under the escort of a sentinel; and having
represented the peculiar circumstances under which I had obtained my ticket, and the
duty which I
172 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
owed to the public to enforce my claim for admission,
requested that the order of exclusion might be withdrawn. I was haughtily repulsed. At
this instant, two military men, not on duty, with four ladies,
were passed through the gate without any other authority than the dictum of the officer I was addressing. I
complained of the unjust partiality in a respectful manner. For that presumption I was
instantly handed over to the next corporal, with orders ‘to take back that
man.’ Collared like a felon, I was forced along the line of foot-guards,
and on reaching the last soldier was thrust against a carriage like an intrusive
hound.”
Never shall I forget the feelings of that evening. After my long detention
in the vain endeavour to assert my right of passing the outer gate, I waited to look upon
the street procession. When I came back to my home, exhausted, boiling over with
indignation, I found my wife in a situation of extreme danger. For some days she had been
seriously ill. The funeral procession had passed under our windows. The lurid glare of the
torches; the roll of carriages; the tramp of horses, amidst the universal silence of the
crowd;—these, almost unendurable for any invalid, who could hear all but who could not look
out upon a scene so solemn and so exciting, produced the most alarming effects upon one who
was at the extreme point of weakness. By God’s Providence, our medical friend, a
surgeon of the first eminence in Windsor, returned with me to my house, having been himself
subjected to the outrages of the military. He was thus the means of bestowing such
immediate attentions upon his patient as probably saved her in the dangerous crisis of that
melan-
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 173 |
choly November night. The one great and enduring happiness of
my life was to be preserved to me.
At this Royal Funeral, when a whole nation was present in heart and mind,
these military outrages were not the sole disorders and indecencies. The undertaker’s
men were unmistakeably drunk, as they reeled up the steep Castle street. Within St.
George’s Chapel there were struggles and murmurs, as in an overcrowded pit at the
theatre; for three or four hundred rank and file of the Guards were placed from the western
entrance to the extremity of the nave, so as to prevent nine-tenths of the
assemblage—admitted by tickets—from seeing more of the solemnity than they could have seen
had the outer walls of the Chapel been the barrier to their desires. Just before the
procession arrived, there was a noisy conflict at the door of the Choir, which had ulterior
consequences. One of the Canons refused to admit a confidential page of the Regent, who had been commanded to notice and report to his
royal master how the ceremony was conducted. “It is our freehold,” said
the Church Dignitary. “It is the Chapel of the Order of the Garter,”
replied the offended Ruler; “and until the clerical ministers of the Order can
behave better, they shall come down from their accustomed seats in the stalls of the
Knights.”
In my newspaper of the Saturday which followed the Supplement of the 20th of
November, I wrote an article entitled “Excessive Employment of
Soldiery in a Religious Solemnity, and Abuses in Military Power.” My
animadversion on “Abuses in Military Power” was bitter enough in its
general invective; but there was nothing that the epauletted puppies
174 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
who talked of horsewhipping the newspaper-fellow could have produced in a court of justice
as a justification of a new outrage. I have detailed this occurrence at somewhat greater
length than it probably deserved; but it presents a striking contrast not only to the
altered temper of the military in these happier times, but to the manner in which the
conductors of the Press are now respected in the discharge of their useful functions as the
accredited representatives of the people. No military man, however brutal and ignorant—if
ignorance and brutality have not altogether vanished from the soldier’s
character—would dare to comport himself as the officer in command at the Castle-gate
behaved to me. The Horse Guards in the streets displayed the most exemplary forbearance
amidst the crowd. The Foot Guards, who were posted within the limits of the Castle, where
the civil power was inoperative and the military power was uncontrollable, however brave
some might have been in the day of battle, displayed, as I intimated, the very reverse of
the character of the “Happy
Warrior”— ——“placable because occasions rise So often that demand such sacrifice; More skilful in self-knowledge, e’en more pure As tempted more; more able to endure, As more exposed to suffering and distress; Thence also more alive to tenderness.” |
It was folly thus to quote Wordsworth
for the possibility of raising a blush upon the cheeks of those who, “graced with
a sword but worthier of a fan,” were the merest loungers in country quarters,
despising, as was the fashion of the mess-room of that time, every book but the
“Racing Calendar” and
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 175 |
“Tom and Jerry.” Many of
the best and bravest of the English army had fallen at Waterloo. Their places were supplied
by youths from school and college, who looked to a military life in times of peace as one
of idleness and luxury. To despise the civilian was a part of their training. To maintain
such a discipline as would teach the soldier the duty of obedience to the civil power and
of respect for the citizen—he himself being a citizen—was not the prevailing doctrine of
the barrack in the latter days of the Regency. The military were too often a nuisance in
the towns where they were quartered. I have a curious correspondence before me between the
Under-Secretary of State and my father, the Mayor of
Windsor, in March, 1818. Lord Sidmouth, as was his
wont, had sniffed a plot from afar, and Mr. Hobhouse
thus called upon the chief magistrate of Windsor to be vigilant:—
“I am directed by Lord Sidmouth
to inform you that his Lordship has heard of an intention to create a mob at Windsor on
Monday next, under colour of a wish to ascertain the life of his Majesty. His Lordship
has not at present any decisive proof of this intention, and perhaps may not receive
any; but he deems it to be right to apprise you of the circumstance as it has come to
his knowledge, and will afford you all further information which may reach this office.
Lord Sidmouth relies with confidence on your discretion in
quelling any disturbance which may be attempted; and if any intelligence should be
received by you which you may deem fit to communicate, he will be ready to give it his
best attention.”
The Mayor’s reply to the Under-Secretary of State was as follows:—
176 |
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: |
[Ch. III. |
“In answer to your letter, which I had the honour to receive by a
messenger this day, respecting an intended mob, I beg to assure you, for the
information of Lord Sidmouth, that I do not
entertain the most distant apprehension of any such circumstance originating in this
neighbourhood. It is said that a bull is to be baited on Monday next, in a piece of
ground adjoining this town; a brutal amusement, which has too frequently occurred at
this place, which I would gladly suppress were I possessed of sufficient authority.
Whenever a bull-bait has taken place here, a very large portion of the military have
joined in the amusement. Lord Sidmouth will judge of the
expediency of interdicting the soldiery joining, under the apprehended occurrence.
Lord Sidmouth may rely on my utmost precaution to prevent, as
well as my exertion to quell, any disturbance, should such unfortunately
happen.”
The correspondence which I have thus given is probably preserved in the
State Paper Office. According to the sensible regulations under which those valuable
materials for history are to be consulted, it will not be open to the public view till a
time when the researches of the antiquarian will not prematurely disclose the secrets of
the statesman. Will posterity conclude, from the mysterious phrase of the Home Office,
“under colour of a wish to ascertain the life of his Majesty,” that
there was a popular notion that George III. was dead? I
may venture to say that “the mob,” ignorant as it was for the most part, never
entertained such an absurd belief. The letter of the Mayor of Windsor will fix that date of
our uncivilization when bull-baiting was a national institution. Windham defended it at the
Ch. III.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 177 |
beginning
of the century as tending to keep up the martial spirit of the people. Few of the present
generation remember this. The inhabitants of Windsor in the days of Queen Victoria would indeed be surprised to see “the
surly bull,” decorated with ribbons, led in pomp to their Bachelors’
Acre—perhaps would be as much alarmed, under a show of courage, as when in the days of
Queen Elizabeth Master Slender asked Anne Page,
“Why do your dogs bark so? Be there bears in the town?” Most people
indeed think—probably even those of Birmingham, who daily look upon their Bull-Ring—that
bull-baiting was peculiar to the Middle Ages. Travelling from Ryde to Ventnor in the spring
of 1863, a bull-ring at Brading was pointed out to a young man on the coach. He exclaimed,
“What! has there been any bull-baiting in England within the last hundred
years?” “Aye, sir,” I told him, “and
cock-fighting, too.” The spirit of gambling prevented both amusements from
dying out. The butcher and the costermonger backed each his dog for pinning the bull. The
Staffordshire collier pitted his cock against that of the sporting farmer. The Wednesbury
Cocking had as much attraction as the Derby of the present day. “The Cockpit,”
which Hogarth immortalized in the days of George the Second, was succeeded by “the Westminster
Pit” of the Regency, when Members of Parliament stepped across the way to see the Dog
Billy kill a hundred rats in five minutes. “Varmint” was an attraction that
competed in interest with the Prize-Fight. Magistrates then took very little trouble to
hunt the Gullys and Tom
Springs from Surrey into Berkshire, and from Berkshire into 178 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. III. |
Buckinghamshire. They somewhat too frequently had their rendezvous
within a dozen miles of Windsor. The only exhibition of pugilism I ever saw was perfectly
unmolested by justice or constable. It was on Maidenhead Thicket, where the renowned
Pierce Egan, with a considerate regard for a
brother of the Press, got me a good place, out of which I escaped as fast as I could, when
I saw Young Dutch Sam fall across the ropes with a
broken arm. Those were the palmy days when the Ring was a national institution, equally
patronized by peer and pickpocket. But in getting rid of bull-baiting and cock-fighting,
and, to a great extent, of pugilism, have we not, in these days of diffused intelligence,
exhibitions of barbarism quite as revolting? Female Blondins are killed now; and the shows go on as tranquilly as if a monkey
had fallen from the top of a pole.
Joseph Addison (1672-1719)
English politician and man of letters, with his friend Richard Steele he edited
The Spectator (1711-12). He was the author of the tragedy
Cato (1713).
Arminius (18 BC c.-21)
German chieftain who defeated a Roman army in the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest.
Charles Blondin (1824-1897)
French tightrope walker and acrobat who in 1859 crossed Niagara Falls on a
tightrope.
Henry Brooke (1703 c.-1783)
Educated at Trinity College, Dublin, he was a barrister and author of two popular works,
a tragedy,
Gustavus Vasa (1739) and a novel
The
Fool of Quality, 5 vols (1776-70).
Princess Charlotte Augusta (1796-1817)
The only child of George IV; she married Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg in 1816 and died
in childbirth the following year.
William Clowes (1779-1847)
The son of a Chichester schoolmaster, he was the first printer to develop the steam
press, from 1823.
John Singleton Copley, baron Lyndhurst (1772-1863)
The son of the American painter; he did legal work for John Murray before succeeding Lord
Eldon as lord chancellor (1827-30, 1834-35, 1841-46); a skilled lawyer, he was also a
political chameleon.
Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658)
English general and statesman; fought with the parliamentary forces at the battles of
Edgehill (1642) and Marston Moor (1644); led expedition to Ireland (1649) and was named
Lord Protector (1653).
George Cruikshank (1792-1878)
English caricaturist who illustrated the satirical periodical
The
Scourge (1811-16) and later Dickens's
Sketches by Boz
(1836).
Bryan Donkin (1768-1855)
English engineer and inventor; he developed a paper-making machine and invented a
steel-nibbed pen.
Pierce Egan (1772-1849)
English journalist who wrote about crime, boxing, and other popular subjects; he invented
the characters Tom and Jerry in 1820.
Frederick William III of Prussia (1770-1840)
King of Prussia from 1797 to 1840; he refused to institute constitutional government
following the Congress of Vienna.
George Hamilton- Gordon, fourth earl of Aberdeen (1784-1860)
Harrow-educated Scottish philhellene who founded the Athenian Society and was elected to
the Society of Dilettanti (1805); he was foreign secretary (1841-1846) and prime minister
(1852-55).
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
John Gully (1783-1863)
English prize-fighter who made a fortune in horse-racing and was afterwards MP for
Pontefract (1832-37).
Henry Hobhouse (1776-1854)
The son of Henry Hobhouse (1742-1792), he was educated at Eton and Brasenose College,
Oxford, and after working as a solicitor in Customs was permanent under-secretary of state
for the Home department (1817-27).
William Hogarth (1697-1764)
English satirical painter whose works include
The Harlot's
Progress,
The Rake's Progress, and
Marriage à la Mode.
William Hone (1780-1842)
English bookseller, radical, and antiquary; he was an associate of Bentham, Mill, and
John Cam Hobhouse.
Henry Howard, earl of Surrey (1517-1547)
English sonneteer known as the Earl of Surrey; the son of the Duke of Norfolk, he was
beheaded for treason.
James Henry Leigh Hunt (1784-1859)
English poet, journalist, and man of letters; editor of
The
Examiner and
The Liberal; friend of Byron, Keats, and
Shelley.
Charles Knight the elder (1750-1824)
Windsor bookseller and printer; he was the father of the publisher and writer of the same
name.
Friedrich Koenig (1824 fl.)
The German-born inventor of the steam press, put into service at The Times 29 November
1814.
Leopold I King of Belgium (1790-1865)
The son of Prince Francis Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld; after serving in the Russian
army he married Princess Charlotte in May 1816; in 1831 he was inaugurated as the first
king of the Belgians.
Louis XVIII, king of France (1755-1824)
Brother of the executed Louis XVI; he was placed on the French throne in 1814 following
the abdication of Napoleon.
Antonio Magliabecchi (1633-1714)
Italian scholar who catalogued the manuscripts in the Biblioteca Laurenziana and
collected a vast personal library.
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Hugh Percy, third duke of Northumberland (1785-1847)
The son of the second duke (d. 1817), he was educated at Eton and St John's College,
Cambridge, and before succeeding to the title was a Tory MP for Buckingham (1806),
Westminster (1806), Launceston (1806-07), and Northumberland (1807-12). He was
lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1829-30).
Matvei Platov (1757-1818)
Russian general who commanded the Don Cossacks in the Napoleonic wars.
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Young Dutch Sam (1808-1843)
The son of the puglist Dutch Sam (1775-1816), he was a welterweight champion in the 1820s
and 30s.
Nicholas Soult (1769-1851)
Marshal of France and commander in the Peninsular War.
William Sidney Walker (1795-1846)
English poet, translator, and scholar educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge; he
suffered from mental disease and his poems and work on Shakespeare's prosody were published
posthumously. He contributed to the
Etonian and
Knight's Quarterly Review.
John Walter (1776-1847)
After education at Merchant Taylors' School and an apprenticeship with Thomas Longman he
succeeded his father (also John Walter) as proprietor of
The Times,
which he co-edited with John Staddart and Thomas Barnes.
Robert Watt (1774-1819)
Educated at Glasgow University and Edinburgh University, he was a schoolmaster,
physician, and compiler of the
Bibliotheca Britannica
(1819-24).
Samuel Whitbread (1764-1815)
The son of the brewer Samuel Whitbread (1720-96); he was a Whig MP for Bedford, involved
with the reorganization of Drury Lane after the fire of 1809; its financial difficulties
led him to suicide.
William Windham (1750-1810)
Educated at Eton and University College, Oxford, he was a Whig MP aligned with Burke and
Fox and Secretary at war in the Pitt administration, 1794-1801.
Thomas Winter [Tom Spring] (1795-1851)
Born in Herefordshire, he was an English prizefighter who later worked as a model at the
Royal Academy.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
The Day. (1809-1817). A daily newspaper edited by Eugenius Roche (1809-11), John Scott, and Robert Hogan; it
merged with the
New Times.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.
William Hone (1780-1842)
The Every Day Book, or, a Guide to the Year: describing the Popular
Amusements, Sports, Ceremonies, Manners, Customs, and Events, incident to the three hundred
and sixty-five Days in past and present Times. 2 vols (London: Wm. Tegg, 1826-1827). Originally published in weekly parts, 1825-26.