Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter IX
CHAPTER IX.
THE title of our projected work had not been decided when
contributions reached me, sufficient in number and quality to indicate that my Cambridge
friends were thoroughly in earnest. The “English
Magazine” was rather a favourite name with us. I scarcely recollect how
“Knight’s Quarterly
Magazine” was adopted; but there appears to have been no doubt upon the
point when Mr. Praed sent me his opening article,
called “Castle Vernon.” A
very singular paper it was, quite removed from the ordinary tone of what Leigh Hunt has somewhere designated as the most amiable but
least interesting part of a book. The only prospectus which I issued was an extract from
this eccentric Introduction:
“To the Lady Mary
Vernon, the Mistress of all Harmony, the Queen of all Wits, the
Brightest of all Belles, we, the undersigned, send greeting:
“We, the undersigned, are a knot of young men, of various forms and
features—of more various talents and inclinations; agreeing in nothing, save in two
essential points—a warm liking for one another, and a very profound devotion for your
Ladyship.
“Some of us have no occupation.
“Some of us have no money.
Ch. IX.] |
THE FIRST EPOCH. |
297 |
“Some of us are desperately in love.
“Some of us are desperately in debt.
“Many of us are very clever, and wish to convince the Public of the
fact.
“Several of us have never written a line.
“Several of us have written a great many, and wish to write
more.
“For all these reasons, we intend to write a Book.
“We will not compile a lumbering quarto of Travels, to be bound in
Russia, and skimmed in the Quarterly, and
bought by the country book-clubs;—nor a biting Political Pamphlet, to be praised by
everybody on one side, and abused by everybody on the other, and read by nobody at
all;—nor a Philosophical Essay, to be marvelled at by the few, and shuddered at by the
many, and prosecuted by His Majesty’s Attorney-General;—nor a little Epic Poem in
twenty-four books, to be loved by the milliners, and lauded in the ‘Literary Gazette,’and burnt by your
Ladyship.
“But a Book of some sort we are resolved to write. We will go forth
to the world once a quarter, in high spirits and handsome type, and a modest dress of
drab, with verse and prose, criticism and witticism, fond love and loud laughter;
everything that is light and warm, and fantastic, and beautiful, shall be the offering
we will bear; while we will leave the Nation to the care of the Parliament, and the
Church to the Bishop of Peterborough. And to
this end we will give up to colder lips and duller souls their gross and terrestrial
food; we will not interfere with the saddle or the sirloin, the brandy-bottle or the
punch-bowl;—our food shall be of the spicy curry and the glistening champagne; our
inspiration shall be the thanks
298 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
of pleasant voices, and the smiles
of sparkling eyes. We grasp at no renown—we pray for no immortality; but we trust, that
in the voyage it shall be our destiny to run, we shall waken many glowing feelings, and
revive many agreeable recollections; we shall make many jokes and many friends; we
shall enliven ourselves and the public together; and when we meet around some merry
hearth to discuss the past and the future, our projects, and our success, we shall give
a zest to our bottle and our debate by drinking a health to all who read us, and three
healths to all who praise.”
Twenty-five signatures followed this address to 4t the idol before whom they
were to prostrate their hearts and their papers.” Some eight or ten of these moms de
guerre clung to the real men during their connexion with the Magazine. Take as the more
distinguished examples:—
Peregrine Courtenay
|
|
Winthrop Mackworth Praed. |
Vyvyan Joyeuse
|
|
,, ,, |
Gerard Montgomery
|
|
John Moultrie. |
Davenant Cecil
|
|
Derwent Coleridge. |
Tristram Merton
|
|
Thomas Babington Macaulay. |
Edward Haselfoot
|
|
William Sidney Walker. |
Hamilton Murray
|
|
Henry Malden. |
Joseph Haller
|
|
Henry Nelson Coleridge. |
Peregrine Courtenay was the signature of Praed in “The
Etonian.” Vyvyan Joyeuse was the one he adopted for his
gay and laughing moods in the “Quarterly
Magazine.” The name was in accordance with the description of him who bore
it, when he was called up to explain to Lady Mary and
her coterie the meaning of the address which had been presented to her: “(You
shall call nobody but me.’
Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 299 |
cried a shrill voice; ‘you
shall call nobody but me, Vyvyan Joyeuse!’ And immediately a whimsical apparition
leaped with an opera step into the front of the battalia; a tall thin youth, with long
sallow features; thick brown hair curled attentively, and small gray eyes. He threw a
quick shifting glance upon his auditors, and then, dangling the ribbon of his glass
with both hands, stood prepared for his interrogator.” Christopher North introduced Vyvyan
Joyeuse into his “Noctes,” when he described the Magazine as “a gentlemanly
Miscellany, got together by a clan of young scholars, who look upon the world with a
cheerful eye, and all its on-goings with a spirit of hopeful kindness.” There
is another portrait drawn by Praed, in which, as in many sketches
approaching to caricature—such as those of H. B.
forty years ago—we may trace the best likenesses of eminent men who lived on into another
generation:
“‘Tristram Merton,
come into court.’ There came up a short manly figure, marvellously upright, with
a bad neckcloth, and one hand in his waistcoat-pocket. Of regular beauty he had little
to boast; but in faces where there is an expression of great power, or of great good
humour, or of both, you do not regret its absence.
“‘They were glorious days,’ he said, with a bend, and a
look of chivalrous gallantry to the circle around him, ‘they were glorious days
for old Athens when all she held of witty and of wise, of brave and of beautiful, was
collected in the drawing-room of Aspasia. In those,
the brightest and the noblest times of Greece, there was no feeling so strong as the
devotion of youth, no talisman of such virtue as the smile of beauty.
Aspasia was the arbitress of peace
300 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
and
war, the queen of arts and arms, the Pallas of the
spear and the pen: we have looked back to those golden hours with transport and with
longing. Here our classical dreams shall in some sort wear a dress of reality. He who
has not the piety of a Socrates, may at least fall
down before as lovely a divinity; he who has not the power of a Pericles may at least kneel before as beautiful an
Aspasia.’
“His tone had just so much earnest that what he said was felt as a
compliment, and just so much banter that it was felt to be nothing more. As he
concluded he dropped on one knee, and paused.
“‘Tristram,’
said the Attorney-General, (we really are sorry to cramp a culprit in his line of
defence; but the time of the court must not be taken up. If you can speak ten words to
the purpose ——’
“‘Prythee, Frederic,’ retorted the other, I leave me to manage my own course. I
have an arduous journey to run; and, in such a circle, like the poor prince in the
Arabian Tales, I must be frozen into
stone before I can finish my task without turning to the right or the left.’
“‘For the love you bear us, a truce to your similes: they
shall be felony without benefit of clergy; and silence for an hour shall be the
penalty.’
“‘A penalty for similes! horrible! Paul of
Russia prohibited round hats, and Chihu of China
denounced white teeth; but this is atrocious!’
“‘I beseech you, Tristram, if you can for a moment forget
your omniscience, let us ——‘
“‘I will endeavour. It is related of Zoroaster, that ——’”
Others of the “knot of young men—of various forms and features, of
more various
Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 301 |
habits and inclinations,” were called
before “the Mistress of all Harmony.” There was
Cecil, of whose character no idea could be conveyed in the compass
of a few lines, “except that which will be naturally associated with a
highly-flushed cheek, and a magnificent forehead, and thick black hair.”
There were others whose names figured in the address who were not called at all. Mr. Peregrine Courtenay “having said a few words
in kind remembrance of his quondam passages with Mr. C.
Knight,” it was resolved that “the most entertaining
publication of the day be immediately set on foot, under the title of ‘Knight’s Quarterly
Magazine.’” But there was no chance of coming to a conclusion
upon the question, “who was to edite the work?” The publisher drifted
into the editorship, much against his will; but if his anomalous power had its pains, it
had also its pleasures.
There is perhaps no happiness of the editorial life equal to that of first
reading the manuscript of a contributor in which original genius is so manifest that none
but a blockhead would venture upon an alteration. I have, however, seen a little of such
blockheads in my day—real live editors, obtuse and prosaic as the mysterious Mr. Perkins of the Shakspere folio. Very early amongst the contributions came “La Belle Tryamour,” which Mr. Moultrie described as “the threatened Beppo,” which, if I thought it
too long, or had better matter to supply its place, I was to pack off without ceremony. I
did not avail myself of the permission. One contribution of no common order was at least
secured. In a week or two followed a prose contribution. Those who do not possess, or
cannot obtain—even at such cost as that of works figuring in old catalogues
302 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
as rare—the “Quarterly
Magazine,” which the intelligent public of forty years ago did not exactly
appreciate, may find the noble “Fragments of a Roman Tale” preserved from oblivion in the “Miscellaneous Writings of Lord
Macaulay.” They may also find there an article on “The Royal Society of
Literature.” If they should not care to trace how the scheme of patronage for
the incubation of great authors was mauled by one who was to take the foremost rank amongst
those who have but one patron, the public, he may be struck with the apologue that clenches
the argument. “About four hundred years after the deluge, when King Gomer Chephoraod reigned in Babylon,—and was so
popular that the clay of all the plains round the Euphrates could scarcely furnish
brick-kilns enough for his eulogists, at a time when all authors inscribed their
compositions on massive bricks—this beneficent Prince was petitioned that he should
take order that his people should only drink good wine. A decree was passed that great
rewards should be bestowed upon the man who should make ten measures of the best wine.
The examiners, assembled to judge the wine, decided that all sent in was little better
than poison. There had been a singularly good season, but the only bad wine was that
tasted by the judges. Who can explain this? said the King. An old philosopher then came
forward, and spoke thus:
“‘Gomer Chephoraod, live for ever!
Marvel not at that which has happened. It was no miracle, but a natural event. How
could it be otherwise? It is true that much good wine has been made this year; but who
would send it in for thy rewards? Thou knowest Ascobaruch, who hath the great vineyards
Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 303 |
in the
north, and Cohahiroth, who sendeth wine every year
from the south over the Persian Gulf. Their wines are so delicious that ten measures
thereof are sold for an hundred talents of silver. Thinkest thou that they will
exchange them for thy slaves and thine asses? What would thy prize profit any who have
vineyards in rich soils?’
“‘Who, then,’ said one of the judges, ‘are the
wretches who sent us this poison?’
“‘Blame them not,’ said the sage, ‘seeing that
you have been the authors of the evil. They are men whose lands are poor, and have
never yielded them any returns equal to the prizes which the King proposed. Wherefore,
knowing that the lords of the fruitful vineyards would not enter into competition with
them, they planted vines, some on rocks, and some in light sandy soil, and some in deep
clay. Hence their wines are bad. For no culture or reward will make barren land bear
good vines. Know, therefore, assuredly, that your prizes have increased the quantity of
bad but not of good wine.’
“There was a long silence. At length the King spoke. ‘Give
him the purple robe and the chain of gold. Throw the wine into the Euphrates; and
proclaim the Royal Society of Wines is dissolved.’”
There was another prose article by Mr.
Macaulay in the first number of the Magazine which has not been reprinted.
The evil which was there combated with unusual energy was remedied when the young writer,
who had been bred up in the doctrines of the school of Wilberforce to which his father
belonged, had become a legislator. It was before the days of his political responsibility
that he thus introduced the article on “West Indian Slavery”:—“We espouse
304 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
no party. Zadig himself
did not listen to the memorable controversy about Zoroaster and his griffins with more composure and impartiality than we
hope to display on most of the subjects which interest politicians. We are
neutrals.” To write against Slavery seemed likely to have interested
“the Clapham sect” in the “Quarterly Magazine”—perhaps to have induced them to tolerate even its
occasional levity. Painful must have been the struggle when Macaulay
felt himself compelled to secede after the publication of the first number. But how
honourable to his memory is the letter which he addressed to me, and which this conviction
would alone induce me to publish:—
“Rothley Temple, Leicestershire,
June 20, 1823.
“My dear Sir,—As I fear that it will be impossible for me
to contribute to your Magazine
for the future, I think it due to you and to myself to acquaint you, without
reserve, of the circumstances which have influenced me.
“You are probably aware that there are among my family
connections several persons of rigidly religious sentiments. My father, in particular, is, I believe,
generally known to entertain in their utmost extent what are denominated
evangelical opinions. Several articles in our first number, one or two of my
own in particular, appeared to give him great uneasiness. I need not say that I
do not in the slightest degree partake of his scruples. Nor have I at all
dissembled the complete discrepancy which exists between his opinions and mine.
At the same time, gratitude, duty, and prudence, alike compel me to respect
prejudices which I do not in the slightest degree share.
Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 305 |
And, for the present, I must desist from taking any part in the ‘
Quarterly Magazine.’
“The sacrifice gives me considerable pain. The Magazine
formed a connecting tie between me and some very dear friends, from whom I am
now separated, probably for a very long time; and I should feel still more
concerned if I could imagine that any inconvenience could result from my
conduct.
“I shall probably be in London in about a month. I will
then explain my motives to you more fully. In the meantime, I can only say that
all that has passed between us increases my regrets for the termination of our
connection, and my wishes that it may be renewed under more favourable
circumstances.
“Let me beg that you will communicate what I have said to
nobody excepting Coleridge, Moultrie, Praed, and Malden; and
to them under the injunction of secrecy.
“Believe me, my dear Sir, yours sincerely,
“T. B.
Macaulay.”
Derwent Coleridge, who has been addressed by his
bosom friend as
“A poet’s child, thyself a poet born,” |
contributed “Beauty, a Lyrical
Poem.” Henry Nelson Coleridge sent
a paper full of deep thought eloquently expressed, “Scibile,”—a paper which De Quincey, writing to me some months after its
publication, regarded as truly admirable. Henry
Malden furnished a graceful Italian tale, “Agostino della Monterosa,” in which the
romantic superstitions of the Middle Ages are reproduced with the complete-306 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
ness of a full knowledge. He describes an enthusiast whose mind was
subdued by the arts of a false friend to believe in “the secrets of the Rosy
Cross, and of those spirits of the elements who pervade all that we hear and see and
touch, although we hear them not, and see them not, and feel them not,”—(a
nobler form of credulity, it seems to me, than a belief in spirits whose presence is
indicated by rapping and table-lifting)—to believe in tales of unhappy spirits lingering
over graves and charnel-houses, of unquiet tenants of the tomb; of mighty magicians.
“He pored over ancient chronicles, and read of the black Boy who was the
attendant of Julius Cæsar, and who, though he lived
many years, grew never the older;—of the strange knight, who came, sore spent with
travel, on a huge-boned mulberry-coloured horse, to the court of Charlemagne; and no one knew his name or lineage, or
whence he came, yet he was ever with the Emperor, who did nothing that he did without
his counsel, save when he went down to the great battle of Roncesvalles; and the
strange knight went into the battle, and came not out of it, yet was not his body found
among the slaughtered Paladins;—and of the deaf and dumb dwarf with the yellow beard,
who had the secret ear of the Soldan Saladin, and went with him wherever he went, save
into the holy city of Jerusalem. On tales as wild as these he suffered his mind to
dwell with a blind and visionary faith, and he was filled with a vague and anxious
longing for such supernatural converse.” The power displayed in this tale
might almost lead one to lament that such qualities of genius should have merged into a
life of unambitious usefulness, did we not know that in such a life—that of the trainer Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 307 |
of the young to sound learning, that of a teacher commanding obedience
through love—the truest happiness and honour are to be found.
The smaller poetical contributions of the Magazine were to be grouped in a
concluding paper, entitled, “What you will.” In the
first number we have some exquisite Sonnets by Moultrie, which have been reprinted in his collected Poems. We have one of
Praed’s charming Enigmas. We have, what no
one would expect to find, amatory verses by Tristram
Merton, who might perhaps have rivalled “Tom Moore,” had he not been born for higher things. It is almost
needless to say that there is no reprint in “Lord Macaulay’s Miscellaneous Works”
of the ballad of which we give two stanzas:—
“Oh Rosamond! how sweet it were, on
some fine summer dawn, With thee to wander, hand in hand, upon the dewy lawn, When flowers and heaps of new-mown grass perfume the morning breeze, And round the straw-built hive resounds the murmur of the bees; To see the distant mountain-tops empurpled by the ray, And look along the spreading vale to the ocean far away; O’er russet heaths, and glancing rills, and massy forests green, And curling smoke of cottages, and dark grey spires between. |
“And oh! how passing sweet it were, through the long sunny day, To gaze upon thy lovely face, to gaze myself away, While thou beneath a mountain-ash, upon a mossy seat, Shouldst sing a low wild song to me, reclining at thy feet! And oh! to see thee, income mood of playful toil, entwine Round the green trellice of our bower the rose and eglantine, Still laying on my soul and sense a new and mystic charm At every turn of thy fairy shape and of thy snowy arm!” |
The secession of Macaulay was felt by
all of us as an almost irreparable loss. There was one of our band whose energies were ever
called forth with new
308 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
vigour under pressure and difficulty. Praed had that confidence in his own powers which is at
the root of all greatness, and which is far removed from the vanity of mediocrity. Amidst
the disappointments which had arisen, he wrote to me to entreat that I would not think of
postponing the appearance of the second number. “For myself, I will give night and
day to the Magazine, rather than see it so assassinated.” He amply redeemed
his pledge. He produced for that number more than a fourth of the whole—the first canto of
his Poem “The
Troubadour,” and five prose articles. My other Cambridge allies seconded his
endeavours. But I had also looked around me amongst my own old familiar friends. Such a
friend was Matthew Hill. We had often planned
literary enterprises in concert, in the days when the young barrister was struggling, as
most lawyers have to struggle, when the collar presses hard upon the weak but willing horse
if he be permitted to work, and when hope deferred presses still harder when no profitable
work falls in his way. Of those times my friend had vivid recollections, and he gave
utterance to them in “My Maiden
Brief”—that paper to which an eminent judge alluded from the bench, and
nodded kindly to the stuff gown in the back rows. Hill contributed
also a very striking picture of the Staffordshire Collieries—of that dreary country through which I walked some
thirty years afterwards with Charles Dickens, and
saw whence he had derived one of the most telling scenes of the wanderings of
“Little Nell.” But Mr.
Hill’s vocation was to describe the people of this region. He thus
concludes his paper:—“I wished to preserve some sketch, while the original is yet
in existence, of a Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 309 |
race which refinement, that fell destroyer of
character, has hitherto spared. Soon will these be tales of other times. The primitive
simplicity even of the collieries is threatened. Already have the eyes of Bell and Lancaster searched out this spot of innocent seclusion; and the voice
of education will ere long be heard above the wild untutored sounds which have so long
charmed the ears of the traveller.” I am not sure that “the voice of
education” is yet very powerful in the land where the dwellers had
“no similarity either in speech or features with the peasantry of the
neighbouring districts.” If my friend could spare a day or two from other
departments of “Social Science,” it might be worth while for him to go over the
ground once more, to compare 1823 with 1863.
In this second number of the Magazine I wrote a paper, upon which I may not
improperly say a little, as it in some measure related real incidents of my Working Life.
“An unpublished Episode of
Vathek” is reprinted in my volumes of “Once upon a Time.” Mr. Rutter, an
enterprising bookseller of Shaftesbury, had proposed to me to publish a splendidly illustrated work, which he was
preparing, on Fonthill, soon after the period when the wondrous building, of which every
one had some marvel to relate but which no one had ever seen, was thrown open to those who
chose to travel over Salisbury Plain, and pay a guinea for the long-coveted sight.
Bekfudi, says my tale, the superb merchant, had
gone on for many moons building and embellishing his mosque, and living in a round of
selfish enjoyment. But gradually Bekfudi found there was a limit to his extravagance.
Bekfudi was in debt.
310 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
“He resolved to invite all Samarah to
see his mosque, and purchase his curiosities. For three moons all Samarah went mad.
Away ran the idle and the busy to scramble up Bekfudi’s tower,—to wander about
his long galleries upon carpets from Cairo,—to touch his gold censers, or to pore upon
his curious pictures. As to his books, Bekfudi carefully locked them up. He was a great
commentator, and his relish for theological speculations led him to fear that his
performances might introduce him to too close an acquaintance with the mufti and the
cadi.” I was amongst the curious, and had an agreeable holiday. But some
months later I went to Fonthill to assist the worthy quaker bookseller of Shaftesbury in
getting up his quarto. Fonthill had then passed into the possession of Mr. Farquhar, in the negotiation for which purchase
Mr. Phillips, the famous auctioneer of Bond
Street, was the agent. He stipulated for the purchase of Fonthill and everything which it
contained: “‘I will purchase thy lands and thy mosques, and thy silken
draperies, and thy woven carpets, and thy golden vessels, and thy jewels, and thy
books, and thy pictures, and all that thy palace contains; and here, without, I have
twenty dromedaries laden with four hundred thousand sequins, which shall be
thine.’ Bekfudi was in a rage, but the eloquence of the dromedaries prevailed;
and that night the little Jew locked up the mosque with the airs of a
master.” At this juncture I went to Fonthill. Artists were there making drawings.
Journalists were there writing elaborate paragraphs, with a slight tendency to puff. My
friend Stedman Whitwell was with me, and we rambled
freely over the American gardens, and partook of the choice Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 311 |
fruit of
the hothouses, and had a sumptuous table every day. To me the ostensible lord of the place,
the clever auctioneer, was particularly civil. The first night I was led by him through a
long corridor apart from the saloons and galleries of this architectural marvel, and was
installed in a chamber of state, where the hangings of the bed were of velvet, and the
chairs were of ebony reputed to have belonged to Wolsey. I sat in a reverie, moralizing upon the probable dispersion of
these splendid things, when I heard a whirr—my wax candle was suddenly extinguished—the bat
that had dwelt in the gorgeous draperies was hovering about me. I was glad to creep into
the downy bed. But I could not sleep. “Why rather, sleep, liest thou in smoky
cribs?” There were others to whom sleep was that night more difficult to be
secured than to myself. Two or three adventurous artists—I think George Cattermole was of the number—elected to lodge in
the dormitories of the great tower, some hundred and fifty feet above the floor from which
it sprang. The wind rose; the storm grew louder and louder; the frail structure rocked, as
Gulliver’s cage rocked in the eagle’s
beak. The terrified guests rushed down the broad stairs, and sat drearily in the dark
saloon till the daybreak gave them assurance of safety. But I am rambling from my Episode of Vathek. “Within a week the superb merchant
began to indulge a wish for the possession of some of his former most splendid baubles;
he bethought him that his free habit of expressing his thoughts in the broad margins of
his beautiful manuscripts might one day cause some awkward inquiries.” I was
taken by my host to the Library. “You are free,” he said, “to
make any 312 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
transcript you please of marginal notes on these books. I
have sent an invitation to Hazlitt to come also;
but I hear that he has not got beyond Winterslow Hut.” Something was
whispered about a new book, to be called “Fly Leaves from
Fonthill.” My curiosity was roused, though I shrank from making profit by
book or article out of my notes. In truth, as far as I could trace, there was little in
these volumes to alarm their annotator or interest the public. I need not have tested my
conscience. When the Library had been glanced at by profane eyes the object was
accomplished. “The articles,” says the Episode, “were selected,
but the little Jew had yet to name the price. Bekfudi raved and tore his hair when a
fourth of his four hundred thousand sequins were demanded for what had cost even him
not a tenth of the sum.”
The second number of the Magazine was getting into shape in the middle of the September of 1823,
although its publication was a month behind its due time. With me this was a pleasant
autumn. Mr. Moultrie had come to reside at Eton. We
had friendly walks together. He was writing the second Canto of “La Belle Tryamour,” and as we sat on the lawn of a
little village inn he was rapidly jotting down his verses. In a piece of nonsense which I also wrote as we laughed
and lounged, I said, “I have seen, as I watched
Gerard’s impassioned countenance, the infancy of a
thought struggling into energy in its perilous contest with the fetters of a rhyme, and
at last triumph in the maturity of a stanza.” Mr.
Derwent Coleridge came to visit Mr. Moultrie. He was
also to write for the forthcoming number. I dare say he forgave me when I ventured to say
that
Ch. IX.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 313 |
before he went to work “Davenant had first to be delivered of a theory on the supernatural
creations of Shakspere, and this carried us to
Racine and Voltaire, Aristotle and Confucius; a slight dissertation on the merits of the
Italian Platonists led us to Germany; and we ended, as the candles were brought, with
Kant and Jacob
Behmen.”
In that autumn of 1823, looking back through four decades, I see a youth of
twenty-two, and a man ten years his senior—one who had given “hostages to
fortune”—anxiously engaged in discussing all the circumstances which had led to a
challenge to fight a duel, in which the younger was to be one of the principals. My wife
and I were at breakfast, when Mr. Praed came in,
looking pale and anxious. He begged me to walk out with him. It was nearly the end of the
term, and most of his intimates had left Cambridge. He had come to town by the early coach,
having arranged for a hostile meeting, in London, with a gentleman with whom he had
quarrelled the night before. The subject of difference had been the date of the battle of
Bunker’s Hill. The heat of argument had been so great, that the three unforgiveable
words which, spoken in Parliament, always sent honourable members to their hats, had been
uttered by him. We went from house to house, and from chamber to chamber, to find a friend.
No one was to be found. No one could be found. Would I be his friend? I at once consented, for I was determined that, if possible, there should
be no duel. The place of rendezvous was the Swan with two Necks in Lad Lane. After a little
suspense, a young man came in, who was deputed by his brother, the challenger, to make
314 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. IX. |
the needful arrangements with Mr.
Praed’s friend. He and I retired. My course
was clear. I was instructed not to tender an apology, but the way, I saw, was open for a
compromise. Rustication, expulsion, all the possible dangers of a meeting, were nothing to
the horrors of a younger brother standing by to see his elder brother shot at; or to
imagine the possibility of both of them appearing in the dock of the Old Bailey on their
trial as murderers. I conquered at last. We signed a paper that was satisfactory, and it
was sent under cover to Mr. Macaulay. Mr.
Praed returned to Cambridge by the afternoon coach. A few hours after
Mr. William Henry Ord, then a Fellow Commoner of
Trinity, arrived at my house in great agitation. He was soon made happy. He had come up to
London in all haste with the Tutor of Trinity, Mr.
Whewell. To Dick’s Coffee House we immediately went, to relieve the
apprehensions of this eminent scholar and man of science, then rising into general
reputation. We spent a happy evening together, and nothing more was heard of the matter.
Mr. Hill, in a very admirable paper “On Duelling,” in our first
number, had said—“In the present state of society, the total abolition of duels
cannot, as experience abundantly shows, be effected.” God be praised, the
“state of society” has so changed, that the change has carried with
it not a few great moral as well as political reforms. The Duel has become as much a thing
of the past as the Wager of Battle.
Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC)
Athenian philosopher and scientist who studied under Plato; the author of
Metaphysics,
Politics,
Nichomachean Ethics, and
Poetics.
Aspasia (470 BC c.-400 BC c.)
The mistress of Pericles and target of satirists.
William Thomas Beckford (1760-1844)
English novelist and aesthete, son of the Jamaica planter and Lord Mayor William Beckford
(1709-1770), author of
Vathek: An Arabian Tale, surreptitiously
translated and published in 1786. He was MP for Wells (1784-90) and Hindon (1790-94,
1806-20).
Jacob Behmen (1575-1624)
German mystic much read in England.
Andrew Bell (1753-1832)
Scottish Episcopalian educated at St. Andrews University; he was the founder of the
“Madras” system of education by mutual instruction; Robert Southey was his
biographer.
George Cattermole (1800-1868)
English painter and illustrator; originally an architectural draftsman who worked for
John Britton, he was afterwards a friend and illustrator of Charles Dickens. He was the
brother of the writer Richard Cattermole.
Emperor Charlemagne (742-814)
King of the Franks and Emperor of the West who built his palace school at Aachen.
Derwent Coleridge (1800-1883)
The son of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; educated at St John's College, Cambridge, he was
rector of Helston in Cornwall, principal of St Mark's College (1841), and a writer on
education. He contributed to
Knight's Quarterly Review.
Henry Nelson Coleridge (1798-1843)
The nephew and literary executor of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; he was a barrister and
reviewer for the
British Critic and
Quarterly
Review.
John Payne Collier (1789-1883)
English poet, journalist, antiquary, and learned editor of Shakespeare and Spenser; his
forgeries of historical documents permanently tarnished his reputation.
Confucius (551 BC-479 BC)
Chinese moral philosopher.
Sir William Davenant (1606-1668)
English poet and playwright; he was poet laureate (1638) and founder of the Duke's
Company (1660).
Thomas De Quincey (1785-1859)
English essayist and man of letters; he wrote for the
London
Magazine and
Blackwood's, and was author of
Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821).
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
English novelist, author of
David Copperfield and
Great Expectations.
John Doyle [H. B.] (1797-1868)
Irish portrait-painter and caricaturist, a friend of Thomas Moore and Samuel Rogers; his
political caricatures began appearing in 1827. He was the grandfather of Arthur Conan
Doyle.
John Farquhar (1751-1826)
Scottish gunpowder manufacturer who after making a fortune in India purchased Fonthill
Abbey from William Beckford in 1822. A notorious miser, he was said to have offered a
Scottish university £100,000 to endow a professorship of Atheism.
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
English essayist and literary critic; author of
Characters of
Shakespeare's Plays (1817),
Lectures on the English Poets
(1818), and
The Spirit of the Age (1825).
Matthew Davenport Hill (1792-1872)
English barrister, the brother of Sir Rowland Hill; he was MP for Hull (1833-35),
recorder of Birmingham (1839) and a reformer of criminal laws.
James Henry Leigh Hunt (1784-1859)
English poet, journalist, and man of letters; editor of
The
Examiner and
The Liberal; friend of Byron, Keats, and
Shelley.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
German philosopher, author of
Critique of Pure Reason (1781),
Critique of Practical Reason (1789), and
Critique
of Judgment (1790).
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
Joseph Lancaster (1778-1838)
Founder of the Lancastrian system of education; he published
Improvements in Education (1803).
Zachary Macaulay (1768-1838)
Writer, abolitionist, and father of Thomas Babington Macaulay; he edited the
Anti-Slavery Reporter.
Henry Malden (1800-1876)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was a poet and classical scholar who was
professor of Greek at University College in London (1831-76). He contributed to
Knight's Quarterly Review.
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
John Moultrie (1799-1874)
Educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, he contributed witty Byronic verse to
the Etonian and Knight's Quarterly before becoming rector of Rugby where he was a friend of
Thomas Arnold.
William Henry Ord (1803-1838)
The eldest son of William Ord (d. 1855); educated at Eton, Trinity College, Cambridge,
and Lincoln's Inn, he was MP for Newport, Isle of Wight (1832-37).
Pericles (495 BC c.-429 BC)
Notable Athenian statesman deposed at the outset of the Peloponnesian war.
Harry Phillips (1766 c.-1839)
Of New Bond Street, fine-art auctioneer from 1796; he began in business working for James
Christie (1730-1803).
Jean Racine (1639-1699)
French neoclassical playwright, author of
Andromaque (1667),
Bajazet (1672),
Mithridate (1673) and Phèdre
(1677).
John Rutter (1796-1851)
Quaker printer, bookseller, and topographer in Shaftesbury; he was political agent for
the reformer John Poulter, MP.
Socrates (469 BC-399 BC)
Athenian philosopher whose teachings were recorded by Plato and Xenophon.
Voltaire (1694-1778)
French historian and man of letters; author of, among many other works,
The Age of Louis XIV (1751) and
Candide (1759).
William Whewell (1794-1866)
Writer on science; he was professor of mineralogy at Cambridge (1828-32) and master of
Trinity College (1841-66).
Stedman Thomas Whitwell (1784-1840)
English architect; after the 1825 collapse of the Brunswick Theatre which he designed he
did work for Robert Owen's New Harmony in the United States.
William Wilberforce (1759-1833)
British statesman, evangelical Christian, and humanitarian who worked for the abolition
of slavery. He was an MP for Yorkshire aligned with Fox and Sheridan.
John Wilson [Christopher North] (1785-1854)
Scottish poet and Tory essayist, the chief writer for the “Noctes Ambrosianae” in
Blackwood's Magazine and professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh
University (1820).
Cardinal Thomas Wolsey (1471-1530)
English prelate and sometimes favorite of Henry VIII; he was lord chancellor (1515-29)
and bishop of York (1514-30). He died while under arrest for treason.
Zoroaster (660 BC c.-583 BC c.)
Persian founder of the Zoroastrian religion of which the scripture is the
Zend Avesta.
The Etonian. 2 vols (1820-1821). A monthly literary journal produced by a remarkable group of Eton scholars, edited by
Winthrop Mackworth Praed; Walter Blunt.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.
The Arabian Nights. (1705-08 English trans.). Also known as
The Thousand and One Nights. Antoine Galland's
French translation was published 1704-17, from which the original English versions were
taken.