Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter V
CHAPTER V.
AT this period, when I was working energetically at parish
affairs in addition to my ordinary business, I was equally busied with literary schemes.
The practical and the ideal had possession of my mind at one and the same time, and had no
contention for superiority. I may truly say—and I say it for the encouragement of any young
man who is sighing over the fetters of his daily labour, and pining for weeks and months of
uninterrupted study—that I have found through life that the acquisition of knowledge, and a
regular course of literary employment, are far from being incompatible with commercial
pursuits. I doubt whether, if I had been all author or all publisher, I should have
succeeded better in either capacity. It is true that these my occupations were homogeneous;
but I question whether that condition is necessary in any case—in a lawyer’s, for
example—where there is sufficient elasticity of mind to turn readily out of the main line
to the loop-line (how could I have expressed this in the days before Stephenson?), and sufficient steadiness of purpose to
return to it. In my time of humble journalism at Windsor, I was constantly devising some
magnificent scheme of books that I thought the world wanted; in which opinion, it is most
probable, I should have found no encourager in the cautious experience of “The
Row” or
206 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
in the venturous liberality of Albemarle Street. One
small project I earned out myself without commercial aid.
Keats has described his acquaintance with our grand
old poets:
“Oft had I travell’d in the realms of gold.” |
Now and then I came across a volume which I could take up again and again, even whilst
Byron was stimulating me with his “Corsair” and his “Giaour,” and whilst Wordsworth was awakening a more profound sense of the
higher objects of poetry. Such a volume was Shakspere’s “Sonnets,” rarely published with the Plays, and known only to a few
enthusiasts who did not believe, with Steevens, that
they were sentimental rubbish. Such was “England’s Parnassus,” which I borrowed, and longed to appropriate.
No publisher had then thought it worth while to reprint Drayton, or Wither, or Herrick, or Herbert. The delight which Keats expressed in his noble
Sonnet upon the discovery of
Chapman’s “Homer” was mine, when I first lighted upon
Fairfax’s “Tasso.” I had entered a new realm of gold. To me
that small folio—the first edition, revised by Fairfax himself—was a
precious treasure. There had been no edition of the book for seventy years. Resolved that I
would achieve the honour of reprinting it, I issued an Advertisement, in October, 1817, in
which I said, “Dr. Johnson, with somewhat
of his characteristic temerity, ventured to predict that the ‘Tasso’ of Fairfax would
never be reprinted. If the national taste in poetry had not mended since the days of
that critic, his prophetic flattery of Hoole
would not yet have been disproved.” The produc- Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 207 |
tion of
two small volumes at our
Windsor Press of the exquisite translation that had been forgotten since Collins had rejoiced to hear
Tasso’s harp “by English
Fairfax strung,” was received by a few critics as
creditable to the taste of a country printer. The editing of this volume was a pleasant
occupation to me. I prefixed to it a Life of Tasso, and a Life of
Fairfax. In that of Fairfax I inserted an
Eclogue which was first printed in Mrs.
Cooper’s “Muses’ Library”—a volume which had become scarce, and which I found
at the London Institution. Mr. Upcott was then the
librarian in the new building, which, in its handsome elevation and its judicious interior
arrangements, did credit to the architect, then a young man—Mr.
William Brooks, the father of Mr. Shirley
Brooks. My reprint appeared a little before that of Mr. Singer; or probably I might have shrunk from the
competition.
Every now and then, however, my newspaper opened subjects of a new and
interesting character, which engaged my attention for a time. Such was the question of
inquiry into the Endowed Charities of the country, which in 1818 had assumed a national
importance. By the strenuous exertions of Mr. Brougham
a Commission was appointed—first to inquire into charities connected with Education, and
then into all charities. Pending the results of this investigation, a volume was published
by a member of the Bar, Mr. Francis Charles Parry,
on the Charities of Berkshire. Such an account as this gentleman collected, somewhat too
full of vague charges of abuses, determined me to undertake a really useful labour—that of
carefully searching all the documents relating to the charities
208 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
of
Windsor, and of publishing them in the most complete form in my newspaper. It was an honour
to my native town that no information was withheld from me; and that I could discover no
misappropriation of bequests, and no violation of “the will of the founder.”
Nor was there any example of that species of legal construction of “the will of the
founder” which has built up the magnificence of many of the London Companies. Vast
are their rent-rolls. In days when houses and lands were not worth a twentieth part of
their present nominal value, these magnates became the inheritors of many a fertile acre
and many an improveable tenement, in trust that they should pay, for defined charitable
purposes, a particular amount of pounds sterling, annually and for ever—probably the then
rent of those lands and houses leaving something for needful charges. The rents of the
fourteenth, or fifteenth, or sixteenth centuries—the defined sums—are justly paid. The
surplus of the rents of the nineteenth century, increased twenty-fold or even fifty-fold,
are partially employed for useful purposes; but they go very far towards the cost of the
turtle and loving-cups upon which so much of the public welfare depends. Though Windsor had
no flagrant abuses, a few of our charities furnished an example of the necessity of giving
large powers to Charity Commissioners, if not for authorizing the Government, to deal with
some benevolent provisions of ancient times in a way better adapted to the wants of modern
society. But the greater number were not wholly for past generations in their usefulness.
There was a Free School, with a considerable permanent income, where fifty boys and girls
were educated and clothed. Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 209 |
It did not belong to the then much abused
class of Grammar Schools—of which there were several specimens within my knowledge—where
the clergyman, who was also the schoolmaster, put the funds into his pocket because the
farmers’ and labourers’ sons did not want to learn Latin. The poor children of
our borough were taught those humble accomplishments which Sir
William Curtis eulogised as the three Rs—Reading, Riting, and Rithmetic.
With the aid of supplementary endowments for Apprenticing Poor Boys and Rewarding Diligent
Apprentices, many of these lads became thriving tradesmen. I could point to one man whom I
am proud to call my friend, who came to my father to be apprenticed with his blue livery on
his back; received the reward upon the faithful completion of his indentures; pursued the
trade on his own account in which he had been a valuable assistant; is now not unknown to
the world, as having, before the days of railroads, organised a newspaper-system which
fought against space and time to give the earliest intelligence to the Liverpool Exchange;
and has become himself a newspaper proprietor, and one of the chief mediums for the
journalistic communication between England and her Colonies as well as with North and South
America. Honoured be the memory of Archbishop Laud,
who by his will thus made provision not only for the apprenticeship of “children
of honest poor people;” but laid the foundations of their future prosperity.
Many a young woman, through his provident care, has kept her position in “the
faithful service of the antique world,” and has not rushed into premature
wedlock, sustained by the hope of receiving a marriage-portion on the condition of having
210 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
served the same master or mistress for three years. Let us cherish
the memory of Laud for the sake of his Berkshire Charities. What
matters it to us that we have outgrown his politics and his polemics! May we never, in
dreams of universal philanthropy, believe that we are growing in true philosophy when we
attempt to exclude individual sympathies for the lowly by larger aspirations for the human
race. Above all, let us not presume to obliterate the Past, by turning aside from those who
have helped, each according to his lights, to build up a wider Present—erring
men—short-sighted—enemies to progress in the abstract, but nevertheless, in their practical
benevolence, working for the “one increasing purpose” of human
improvement. The time, I trust, is very distant, when some pragmatical reformer, armed with
mere utilitarian weapons of tables and estimates, may persuade the Legislature that it can
do better than continue such bequests as those of Laud, conceived in the ancient spirit of
making charitable provision for the few. The prizes, however unequally distributed, are the
best encouragements for the many. I used to compare the beneficial effects of
Laud’s benevolence, with the positively injurious results of
doles of bread “after Sunday morning service.” We had nine different bequests
for giving bread to the poor—five of them willed in the seventeenth century, and four in
the eighteenth. There were two centuries between the first endowment for “bread to
the poor” in 1603 and the last in 1803. Had the loaves at the church-door succeeded
the dole at the Monastery-gate? These periods did not embrace the golden age of abundance
for all, which some imagine was once the condition of a happy Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 211 |
people.
Forty-eight poor persons regularly attended our parish church on the Sunday morning, drawn
thither, I fear, more by the prospect of the half-quartern loaf than by a hungering for
“the bread of life.” Such almsgiving is, of all others, the most
destructive of the self-respect of the recipients. I would not care to preserve these
endowments; nor that other very perplexing one of Six Pounds, to be distributed amongst
twelve of “the godliest poor of Windsor.” Our Spinning Charity, which
had endured for two centuries, has, I find, come to an end, as it was difficult to obtain
people to work at spinning. (“Annals of
Windsor,” vol. ii. p. 425.) Year after year the old spinners had died out;
there were no young spinners to succeed; and the very name of “spinster” had
become obsolete, except in the publication of banns of marriage. The almswomen, inhabiting
five or six different blocks of houses in various parts of the town, kept up as well as
they could this unprofitable labour. The words of the first bequest of 1621 were, that
“the poor might be continually employed in the making of cloth.” The
convictions of the pious persons who bequeathed their lands and houses for an artificial
stimulus of industry furnish a sufficient example of the state of the country, when the
ordinary operations of capital were insufficient to adjust the relations of demand and
supply. The age of domestic manufactures was certainly not one of general prosperity. The
machinery in our town for prolonging the primitive system was curious. Imagine a busy
corporator, even forty years ago when all worked less, occupied, first, in buying a store
of flax; secondly, in giving it out, pound by pound, to the old crones who could still keep
the 212 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
wheel at work; thirdly, in weighing the yarn when returned, and
paying at a fixed rate, however ill the labour was performed; fourthly, in making the best
arrangement he could for having it woven, in a part of the country where the weaver’s
shuttle had gone out even before the spinning-wheel. Lucky was the almswoman who enjoyed a
bequest omitted in the charity records. An ancient lady was inspired to accomplish one of
the objects of Pope’s satire— “Die and endow a college or a cat.” |
The cat had lived through nine lives in my time; but I presume she is not immortal.
Social Science in 1818 had a very small attendance of disciples in her
schools. For an inquiring few, she had her Primers and her Junior Class Books; and in her
inner courts for the initiated, Bentham was
preaching in a language the farthest removed from popular comprehension. Romilly, in the House of Commons, had been labouring for
ten years to amend the Criminal Laws. His valuable life was closed prematurely before he
had achieved any marked victory over the system under which the death penalty was
capriciously enforced, to inspire “a vague terror” amongst the whole
criminal population. The prisons were nurseries of crime. The detective police were amongst
crime’s chief encouragers. Forgery nourished above all other crimes, for the
Government offered the temptation whilst they unsparingly hanged the tempted. The Game Laws
raised up pilfering peasants into gangs of brigands. Smuggling was nurtured into the
dignity of commercial enterprise, by protective duties so absurdly high that a wall
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 213 |
of brass could not have kept out the brandies and lace and silk that
the Continent was ready to pour in. The great bulk of the population was wholly ignorant
and partly brutal. The Church had not awakened from its long sleep. If the schoolmaster was
abroad, he was rather seeking for work than doing it. Looking as a journalist upon our
social condition, I was sometimes unhappy and desponding. My dissatisfaction found a vent
in letters from an imaginary correspondent:—
“The prevailing feeling which a newspaper excites in my breast,
without the indulgence of any sickly sensibility, is that of melancholy. It presents a
gloomy portrait of our species. It is a living herald of the bad passions of
individuals and the mistakes of society. It discovers little of the better part of
mankind, for the most elevated virtue is the most unobtrusive. The atmosphere of vice
is a broad and visible darkness overspreading the land, through which the gaunt
spectres of crime glare fearfully upon us. The newspaper applies its microscopic eyes
to these miserable objects; like Tam
O’Shanter, it looks upon their secret revels—it notes every
movement of the infuriated dance; it traces the progress of evil from its mazy
beginning to its horrible close; it anatomizes the deformities of the heart, and
encases them for public exhibition. Should these spectacles be withheld from the
general eye? Unquestionably not. They administer, indeed, to that love of strong
excitement which characterizes the human mind in every state, but which operates most
powerfully upon a highly refined community—and so far they are mischievous. But still
they have a voice of edification. They
214 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
summon us all to the labour
of opposing that flood of iniquity which threatens to break down the dykes and mounds
of our social institutions; they call us to eradicate the canker which interrupts the
natural spring of moral health. The evil is in the root. The institutions for the
prevention and punishment of crime are founded upon a wrong view of human nature; they
have a direct tendency to confirm and multiply the effects of depraved ignorance.
“Your weekly ‘map of busy life’ reaches me in the
solitude of the most beautiful and the least visited part of Windsor Forest. This
morning I rose ere the sun had lighted the autumnal foliage with a brighter yellow and
a richer brown. My walk was in the silent woods. All around me was cheerfulness. The
birds of song were pouring forth their instinctive gratitude for returning day—the
noisy rooks had a spirit of gladness in their whirling flights—the graceful deer glided
before me with fearless nimbleness. My heart expanded at the enjoyments of these humble
beings. Surely, I exclaimed, every creature that lives in conformity to its nature is
happy. I returned to my home. Your journal was on my breakfast-table. The calendar of
the ‘Old Bailey’ met my view. I read of the condemnation of thirty-five
persons to the penalty of death, and of nearly two hundred to lesser degrees of
punishment. I considered that these scenes are repeated every six weeks!* The
impressions of my morning walk had a redoubled force. I felt assured that man was not
destined to crime and misery.
* The Central Criminal Court was not established till 1834.
The Sessions of the Old Bailey, previous to that change, were held eight times
a year for the trial of offences committed in Middlesex. |
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 215 |
Are, then, these penal modes of counteracting the corruptions of
society suggested by reason and benevolence?”
I believe that at this period I got into a morbid state of mind, by thinking
too much of
“the heavy and the weary weight Of all this unintelligible world.” |
I had no large and definite object of ambition. My occupations were not engrossing
enough to carry me away from dreamy speculations. I pored over the Platonic writers,
Proclus and Plotinus, in Taylor’s
translations; and accepted the philosophy of which Coleridge was the modern expositor, as far nobler than the doctrine of
ideas derived from sensation. I sometimes thought that the great mysteries of human life
were clearing up; and then again I relapsed into bewilderment. May I venture to dig out
from its recesses a sonnet which represents my state of mind at this crisis, when the
blessing of the primal curse was not sufficiently laid upon me?— “Unquiet thoughts, ye wind about my heart In many-tangled webs. My daily toil, The obstinate cares of life, the vain turmoil Of getting dross and spending, bear their part In this entanglement; and if my mind Shake off its chains, and, free as mountain-wind, Repose on Nature’s pure maternal breast, Interpreting her fresh and innocent looks Discoursing truth and love clearer than books, Thoughts are still weaving webs of my unrest. O grant me, Wisdom, to behold thee near, Deep, clear, reveal’d as one all-perfect whole; Or give me back the sleep to worldlings dear— Thy glimmerings disturb my heated soul.” |
Turning from metaphysics to hard realities, and looking upon the apparently
interminable warfare
216 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
between Ignorance and Power, I could perceive
very few reconciling principles of social policy, or influential mediators between the
lawless and the governing classes. The King’s Proclamation was duly recited by the
Town Clerk at our Borough Sessions; and as duly did our old Town-Serjeant produce a laugh
when he called for silence whilst “his Majesty’s Proclamation against all
Wice, Perfaneness, and Immorality, was openly read.” I doubt whether His
Majesty’s Proclamation, which had been prescribed as a remedy for social evils at the
beginning of his reign, was very effective after an experience of sixty years. Drunkenness
in our humbler classes was not discouraged by any marked temperance of their superiors,
especially of the elder generation. There was a whole street of a vicious population, where
almost every house was a den of infamy. At the bottom of this foul quarter stood our gaol—a
gaol built by George the Third upon the most approved
plans of the Surveyor-General,—which contained no means whatever of enforcing hard labour.
Offenders were sometimes flogged at the cart-tail through our streets, amidst the hootings
of the populace when the gaoler, who was the executioner, struck hard. There were no
instruments for the prevention of crime but our ancient watchmen, and the one beadle,
parading the town in his laced coat. In the open day, an informer—that most detestable to
the mob of the instruments for enforcing our then abominable fiscal laws—was set upon, and
nearly killed, whilst the constable’s staff hung quietly upon its peg in the shop of
the annual officer. The law did little for the prevention of outrage and felony. Public
opinion looked on, and held its tongue; for to attempt Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 217 |
the reform of
abuses was the province only of wicked democrats called Radicals.
We had established an Auxiliary Bible Society, in which I felt it a duty to
take an active part. I did so, not so much in the hope that the mere possession of the
Scriptures would produce any signal good in an ignorant household, but in the persuasion
that this union in a common endeavour would soften down some of the differences between
Churchmen and Dissenters. In my earliest recollections, all Dissenters went by the generic
name of “Methodists;” and the vulgar term of opprobrium for sectaries in the
palmy days of “Church and King” was “Pantilers.” I saw the
congregation of Independents gradually emerge from a miserable chapel in a squalid
neighbourhood, and plant themselves in the principal street, having as their minister a
sensible, humane, and tolerant man, not very learned, but something better. The Evangelical
Clergy did not scruple to fraternise with the more respectable Dissenters in works of
charity. The dignitaries of our colleges generally kept aloof, and looked upon the changing
aspects of the times with something like dread.
Although, as a journalist, I was impartial towards the Dissenters, I had
often to combat what I deemed their prejudices. I had been trained under George III. to regard the Sunday gatherings on the Terrace as
not only innocent but useful. When the Terrace was shut up, and people of all ranks crowded
to hear the bands in the Long Walk, I thought that this mode of enjoyment was a great deal
better than the back parlour or noisy tap-room of the public-house. The Dissenters thought
otherwise; and one of their body had
218 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
the indiscretion to circulate a
hand-bill from house to house, denouncing us all as Sabbath-breakers and worse than
heathens, in terms which, however familiar to Scotland, were comparatively new to Southern
England. I got into a controversy on this question which might have been better avoided.
But in other respects also I was a sinner. The congregation of Independents had not only
established themselves in the High Street, but had done so by purchasing our little
Theatre, endeared to us by so many recollections of the hearty merriment of the good old
King. The building was quickly metamorphosed into a Meeting House. There was little
encouragement for theatrical performances in Windsor, now there was an end of royal
patronage; for the fact of the residence of the Court at the Castle brought us under the
License of the Lord Chamberlain, which was granted only upon the condition that there
should be no plays enacted except during the vacations at Eton College. Nevertheless we
built a new Theatre at a large cost, with small dividends to the shareholders, of whom my
father was the principal. It was opened in August, 1815; and I wrote a Prologue, which was
not conciliatory towards the sectaries, who regarded our proceedings as highly criminal.
The time was far distant when Shakspere would be
quoted in the Dissenter’s pulpit. Our theatre was pretty and commodious; but the
manager could not draw audiences without stars. In 1817 I became acquainted with Edmund Kean, in his visits to Windsor at our Christmas
season. I was an enthusiastic admirer of his genius; and wrote most elaborate criticisms on
his Othello and Shylock, his Sir Giles Overreach and
Sir Edward Mortimer. I Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 219 |
had
often then what I considered the great privilege of supping with him after the play. He was
always surrounded by two or three followers who administered to his insatiable vanity in
the coarsest style; applauded to the echo his somewhat loose talk; and stimulated his
readiness to “make a night of it.” My unbounded admiration for the
talent of the actor was somewhat interrupted by a humiliating sense of the weakness of the
man. Nevertheless the attraction was irresistible as long as he strove to make himself
agreeable. How exquisitely he sang a pathetic ballad! The rich melody, the deep tenderness,
of his “Fly from the world, O Bessie, to me,” were to
live in my memory, in companionship with the exquisite music of his voice in his best days,
when he uttered upon the stage, in a way which no other actor has approached, the soliloquy
ending with “Othello’s occupation’s gone.”
For one who was thus, naturally enough, considered by “the unco
gude” as a profane Journalist, I became somewhat oddly mixed up with serious
matters. The Church Building Society was at this period beginning to be active. We had to
build a new Church at Windsor—but not an additional church. Our old fabric—to which the
“Merry Wives” of the days of Elizabeth might have resorted with their pages to carry the Prayer Book—was
in danger of falling on our heads, although we had spent large sums in vamping it up. Then,
according to the fashion of that opening day for manufacturers of gaudy elevations,
perplexing plans, and fallacious estimates, we determined upon an architectural
competition. I was Secretary to our Church Building Committee. I there learnt—what will be
a mystery
220 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
to future generations—how jobbery and presumption were
covering the land with ecclesiastical edifices at once the most tasteless and the most
expensive. The old style of the early days of the King, when four brick walls, pierced with
half a dozen holes on each side for windows—the style that suited every public structure,
whether church, barrack, or hospital—was really less offensive than the new style of the
Regent, when the flimsy buttress was added to the bald shadowless walls, and the windows
became a corrupt mixture of every period from the Norman to the Tudor. For the rage was now
for Gothic, so called. We obtained one of this class of Churches, made to the received
pattern, at a preposterous cost for Bath stone and corresponding frippery; when we might
have had, for half the money, a plain erection of the heath stone of which Windsor Castle
is built, with more claim to mediaeval character, in its lancet-windows, sturdy buttresses,
and massive tower—altogether suited to the simple grandeur of the regal pile on our
hill’s summit.
Society, as I then looked upon it with a very narrow range of view, was
decidedly in a transition state. Compared with my earlier remembrances, the middle classes
were becoming more refined and more luxurious. There was more elegance in their household
arrangements, and more expense. Their manners were less formal, their dress more natural.
Hair-powder had altogether gone out; the Hessian boot was in most cases superseded by the
boot under the trousers. Even the Queen’s old-fashioned apothecary no longer wore his spencer, which I used to consider an
essential part of the good man. There were only four queues left amongst us. The young
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 221 |
ladies had begun to be educated more with a view to accomplishments
than housekeeping utilities. There was a good deal of fuss in most houses if the daughters
were asked to play or sing; but some could go beyond “The Battle
of Prague.” I have even heard Haydn’s “Canzonets” given with
taste and feeling. But it was not yet a musical age. The piano disturbed the solemn
whist-players. At Church, none of the congregation, male or female, joined in the dull
Psalmody, but left it all to the charity children. The young women tittered when the old
clerk indulged in his established joke, by giving out the first words of the
Psalm—“Lord I who’s the happy man,”—in compliment to a bride
who hid her blushes under the white veil. Novel-reading was general. Miss Porter and Miss
Edgeworth and Mrs. Radcliffe still
held their ancient empire, and were not driven out by the Waverley Novels. Scott, as a poet, was almost forgotten in the passion for Byron; but Wordsworth was
scarcely known popularly. Upon the whole, though young men from a supper-party were
sometimes riotous in the streets, the old habit of drinking was yielding amongst the middle
classes to better influences. I think I may venture to say that there was not a
“fast” young lady amongst us; though there was a good deal of merriment, and a
country dance upon the carpet would often follow “a round game.” The times,
however, made most of us serious—more so than we used to be in the days when we defied only
a foreign enemy.
To the old dwellers in Windsor it had altogether become a changed place. The
Queen died in November, 1818. The Princesses—so
endeared to their
222 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
humble neighbours by unceasing acts of kindness, and
by a friendliness which took an interest even in the domestic circumstances of those around
them—were then dispersed. The great household of the Castle was broken up. The walk to
Datchet through the Upper Park was closed; and we sighed in vain for some sturdy patriot to
resist the innovation, after the fashion of “Timothy Bennet, of
Hampton Wick, in Middlesex, Shoemaker,” under whose engraved portrait, preserved in a
few houses, was thus inscribed: “This true Briton (unwilling to leave the world
worse than he found it), by a vigorous application of the laws of his country, obtained
a free passage through Bushy Park, which had many years been withheld from the
people.” The Regent had been gradually
patching up his Cottage in the Great Park, till his enormous thatched Palace might have
suggested the notion that it was an immense tithe-barn converted into a workhouse or
infirmary, had it not been for the forest of Gothic chimneys, and the colonnade of unhewn
firs, which implied too much of grotesqueness to indicate any purposes of utility. This
domain was as rigidly guarded from observation as Mr.
Beckford’s gorgeous halls at Fonthill. The Windsor
“purveyors” were very well satisfied with the change from the severe economy
which the Queen had exercised at the Castle since the King’s illness, to the lavish
housekeeping of the Cottage. Scandalous stories, such as a modern Brantôme might have recorded had he dared, were current in
our town. But there was ever mixed up with them some anecdotes of the Regent’s
kindness to his satellites and servants, amongst his frivolities and practical jokes—the
sort of benevolence which the most selfish Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 223 |
show to those whom they
consider as a part of themselves. I used to think it not an unamiable trait of a
considerate host, when the court-butcher told me, “Old Bags
has unexpectedly come down, and a special messenger has gone back to the Cottage as
hard as he could gallop, with calves’ liver, which the old boy relishes better
than all the cookery of my friend the Shef, as they call
him.”
The Court had ceased to have any moral influence at Windsor. We had become
as most other country towns. Groping their way in the labyrinth of social evils by which
they were surrounded, most benevolent persons had come to the conclusion, that the Adults
of their generation must take their chance of growing happier and better under our existing
systems, but that improvements, to be real and permanent, must begin with the Young. The
half-whispered cry was for Education. A good deal had been done since the introduction of
the systems of Lancaster and Bell; but a great deal remained to be done. In Windsor we
had no schools beyond those of the Endowed Charities and a Sunday School. In 1819 there was
residing amongst us a gentleman of whom I shall have more particularly to speak—Mr. Edward Hawke Locker. He originated a well-considered
plan for the establishment of a National School, which by the Christmas of that year was
placed upon a solid foundation. The supporters of this institution had some prejudices to
struggle against, and more indifference. The political aspects of the time not only
diverted public attention from the social, but produced in many unreasoning persons a
solemn conviction that the dozen years of reading and writing that had been imprudently
bestowed upon a portion of
224 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
the manufacturing classes had made them
discontented and seditious; whilst the agricultural labourers, upon whom only a few unwise
friends of the poor had thought it necessary to shower such dangerous gifts, were as
patient as the ox who knoweth his owner, and the ass his master s crib. Let me glance at
these political aspects, which few could regard without serious fears of an unhappy future.
The demand for Parliamentary Reform, which the terror of the French
Revolution had hushed for thirty years, occasionally now raised a feeble voice in a few
legally constituted assemblies. Scouted by majorities of Lords and Commons, a handful of
the old aristocratic denouncers of Rotten Boroughs still claimed for the people the right
of efficient Representation. Bolder advocates rose up amongst the unrepresented classes
themselves, who were taught by itinerant demagogues that every misery of the working man
would vanish at the magical word of Universal Suffrage. In the autumn of 1819, these
dangerous leaders persuaded their adherents that the time for action had arrived. Large
multitudes assembled for the election of Legislatorial Attorneys.
There were riots and arrests; and at length came what is called “The
Manchester Massacre.” The country was thoroughly frightened. Parliament was called
together to make new laws; and it produced what Lord
Campbell describes as “the unconstitutional code called the Six
Acts.” At the Christmas of 1819 every journalist went about his work under
the apprehension that if he wrote what, by the uncertain verdict of a jury, might be
construed into a seditious libel, he would not only be subjected to
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 225 |
very terrible fine and imprisonment, but, if convicted a second time, would be liable to be
transported beyond seas. I looked with dread towards a struggle which would end either in
anarchy or military government. Like Sydney Smith, I
regarded democracy and despotism as equally dangerous results of a contest between power
and mob violence. “In which of these two evils it terminates is of no more
consequence than from which tube of a double-barrelled pistol I meet my
destruction.”
The effect of these circumstances upon my political opinions, during several
succeeding years, is not altogether satisfactory to look back upon. In my hatred and
contempt of the demagogues and profligate writers who were stirring up the ignorant masses
to revolt and irreligion, I turned somewhat aside from regarding the injustice that was at
the root of a desire for change. I panted for improvement as ardently as ever. I was
aspiring to become a Popular Educator. But I felt that one must be content for a while to
shut one’s eyes to the necessity for some salutary reforms, in the dread that any
decided movement towards innovation would be to aid in the work of lopping and topping the
sturdy oak of the constitution till its shelter and its beauty were altogether gone. I
believe this was a common feeling not only with public writers who did not address the
passions of the multitude, but with statesmen who were not subservient partizans. Thence
ensued a reticence in writing and in speaking, which looked like a distrust of the progress
of improvement even with many of decided liberal opinions. I think this was amongst the
worst results of those evil days in which we had fallen in the last months of the
226 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
reign of the old King. I had to drag this chain of doubtful timidity
in my first attempt to address the humbler classes.
As early as 1814 I had the notion of becoming a Popular Educator. I have a
letter before me, written on the 24th of January of that year to the more than friend to whom I laid open all my feelings and
plans, in which I said—“I want to consult you about a cheap work we think of
publishing in weekly numbers, for the use of the industrious part of the community, who
have neither money to buy, nor leisure to read, bulky and expensive books. It will
consist of plain Essays on points of duty; the Evidences of Christianity; Selections
from the works of the most approved English Divines; Abstracts of the Laws and
Constitution of Great Britain; History; Information on useful Arts and Sciences; and
Select Pieces of Entertainment.” The scheme was constantly in my mind; and it
was often present in day-dreams of a more extended area of employment than I then occupied,
especially after I had acquired a little familiarity with the general ignorance of the
working classes, knew something practical of their habits, saw in some few a desire for
knowledge, and felt how ill their intellectual wants could be supplied. Now and then, on
our market-day, in strange juxtaposition with the brown earthenware and the coarse brushes
of the itinerant dealers, would be placed upon a stall the old dog’s-eared volume,
and the new flimsy numbers of the book-hawker. I have seen with pity some aspiring artisan
spend his sixpence upon an antiquated manual of history or geography, to which he would
devote his brief and hard-earned hours of leisure, gaining thus the “two grains of
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 227 |
wheat hid in two bushels of chaff.” Or I have beheld
some careful matron tempted to buy the first number of the “Pilgrim’s Progress” or the “Book of Martyrs”—perhaps one less
discreet bestowing her attention upon the “History of
Witchcraft” or the “Lives of the Highwaymen”—each arranging with the Canvasser for a monthly
delivery till the works should be completed, when they would find themselves in possession
of the dearest books that came from the press, even in the palmy days of expensive
luxuries. For the young, such stalls would offer the worst sort of temptations in sixpenny
Novels with a coloured frontispiece; whose very titles would invite to a familiarity with
the details of crime—of murders and adulteries, of violence and fraud, of licentiousness
revelling in London, and innocence betrayed in the country—something much more harmful than
the old-world stories, the dreams and divinations, of the ancient chap-books. Would the
book-hawker of that time, with his costly, meagre, useless, and worse than useless, wares,
be able to satisfy the intellectual cravings of any young man sincerely desirous profitably
to exercise his newly-acquired ability to read?
I shall have to relate, in the next chapter, how, nearly six years after the
idea of a Cheap Miscellany had been gradually shaping itself in my habitual thoughts, but
still without any notion of an immediate practical result, I suddenly made my first
excursion into the almost untrodden field of cheap and wholesome Literature for the People.
The necessity for some educational efforts to counteract the influence of dangerous
teachers had become more and more apparent. The Government was watchful. It had
228 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
the power of repressing tumult by the military arm, and of suspending
the public liberty for the discovery of conspirators. But it did nothing, and encouraged
nothing, that indicated a paternal Government. There were crafty men in most towns, who
stimulated discontent into outrage, and for a sufficient motive would betray their
associates. Such a man was living at Eton. Upon the trial of the wretched participators in
the Cato-Street Conspiracy, Arthur Thistlewood
denounced this man, as “the contriver, the instigator, the entrapper.”
We are told, from unquestionable authority, in the “Life of Lord Sidmouth,” that the principal
informant of the Home-Office “was a modeller and itinerant vendor of images, named
Edwards, who first opened himself at
Windsor, as early as the month of November, to Sir Herbert
Taylor, then occupying an important official situation in the
establishment of George III.” This Edwards
was not an itinerant vendor of images. I have spoken with him in his
small shop in the High Street of Eton—perhaps at the very time when he was plotting and
betraying. He had some ingenuity as a modeller; and produced a very tolerable statuette of
Dr. Keate, in his cocked hat. His sale of this
little model was considerable amongst the junior boys of Eton College—not exactly out of
reverence for their head-master but as a mark to be pelted at. Does any copy exist of this
historical Portrait? The subject of the little bust and its modeller are both historical
They each belong to a state of society of which we have, happily, got rid. The
schoolmaster, albeit a ripe scholar and a gentleman, belonged to the past times, when
Education, like Government, was conducted upon that system of terror which was the Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 229 |
easiest system for the administrators. “The greatest
happiness for the greatest number,” whether of boys or men, had to be
discovered. In the scholastic, or political, exaltation of the aristocratic system, there
was ample scope for the few clever and aspiring. To these the patrician and the pedagogue
graciously afforded encouragement and substantial patronage. But the mass of the dull, the
unambitious, and the reckless, were left to their own capacity for drifting into evil. If
the misdoers came under the imperfect cognizance of the authorities, they were heavily
punished as a salutary terror to others. The flogging-block was the first step to personal
degradation in the school; the prison, in the State. If these did not answer, the school
was ready with expulsion; the State with the gallows. One essential difference there was in
the two systems. The honour of the Etonian was proof against spydom and treachery as
regarded his fellows. In the terror-stricken politics of that time there was verge enough
for the instigator and entrapper. I have written that Sir Herbert
Taylor, whose honour was unimpeachable, was utterly incapable of suggesting
to the spy that he should incite the wretched associates in the conspiracy to the pursuance
of their frantic designs. (“Popular History of
England,” vol. viii. p. 160.) Yet, if I remember rightly the face of
George Edwards, Sir Herbert Taylor might have
seen that he was a rogue by nature. This diminutive animal, with downcast look and stealthy
face, did not calculate badly when he approached one who, although bred in court-habits,
had a solid foundation of honesty which made him unsuspicious. Sir
Herbert was a man not versed in the common affairs of the outer world. 230 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
He had been the depository of many a political secret which he could
confide to no friend. Shy, painfully cautious, I have heard him break down in the most
simple address to the electors when he first stood for Windsor; and yet a man of real
ability. Imagine a crafty mechanic procuring access to him at the Castle as the starving
man of taste—a plaster cast of his workmanship carefully produced—the guinea about to be
proffered—and then a whisper of some terrible Secret which he could disclose at the peril
of his life—all the outer evidences of contrition, and the resolve to make a clean breast.
Imagine this repeated day by day—with the plot-haunted Lord
Sidmouth eagerly calling for more evidence, and urging Sir Herbert
Taylor to palter with this devil, and not hand him over to the Privy
Council, who might have crushed the cockatrice before the egg was hatched. We may imagine
all this; and yet acquit Sir Herbert Taylor of a participation in the
guilt which too often attaches to those, in all ages, who have fostered treason in waiting
for overt acts.
Before the outbreak of the Conspiracy, an event occurred, which, although
not unexpected, nor fraught with consequences unforeseen, opened a further certain prospect
of political disquiet. The death of George the Third
took place on the evening of Saturday, the 29th of January, 1820. The Duke of Kent, his fourth son, had died only six days before.
The Regent became King; the Duke of York was the
Presumptive Heir to the Throne; the Duke of Clarence
the next in succession. The infant daughter of the Duke of Kent would
succeed, if the three elder brothers of her father should die without issue. The position
of George the Fourth and Queen Caro-
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 231 |
line might again open that miserable
“Book” which the public welfare required to be for ever shut.
The Funeral of George the Third appeared
to me like the close of a long series of reminiscences. Windsor had to me been associated
with the loud talk and the good-natured laugh of a portly gentleman with a star on his
breast, whom I sometimes ran against in my childhood; with a venerable personage, blind,
but cheerful, who sat erect on a led horse, as I had seen him in my youth; with the dim
idea of my manhood, that in rooms of the Castle which no curiosity could penetrate, there
sat an old man with a long beard, bereft of every attribute of rank, who occasionally
talked wildly or threw himself about frantically, and sometimes awoke recollections of
happier days by striking a few chords on his piano. Then came the final pageant. It was a
Poem rather than a show. The Lying-in-State was something higher than undertaker’s
art. As I passed through St. George’s Hall, I thought of the last display of regal
pomp in that room—the Installation of 1805—when at the banquet the Sovereign stood up and
pledged his knights, and the knights, in full cups of gold, invoked health and happiness on
the Sovereign. The throne on which George the Third then sat was now
covered with funeral draperies. I went on into the King’s Guard-Chamber. The room was
darkened—there was no light but that of the flickering wood-fires which burnt on an ancient
hearth on each side. On the ground lay the beds on which the Yeomen of the Guard had slept
during the night. They stood in their grand old dresses of state, with broad scarves of
crape across their breasts, and crape on their halberds. As the red light of the burning
brands
232 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
gleamed on their rough faces, and glanced ever and anon upon
the polished mail of the Black Prince, on the
bruised armour of the soldiers of the Plantagenets, and on the matchlocks and bandoleers of
the early days of modern warfare, some of the reality of the Present passed into visions of
the Past. I thought of Edward of Windsor, the great
builder of the Castle, deserted in his last moments. I thought of other “sad
stories of the deaths of kings.” I came back to the immediate interest of the
scene before me, by remembering that not one of the long line of English sovereigns before
George the Third had died at Windsor. I passed on into the chamber
of death. All here was comparatively modern. The hangings of purple cloth which hid
West’s gaudy pictures of the Institution of
the Order of the Garter; the wax-lights on silver sconces; the pages standing by the side
of the coffin; the Lord of the Bedchamber sitting at its head; much of this was upholstery
work, and did not affect the imagination, except in connexion with the solemn silence,—a
stillness unbroken, even when rustic feet, unused to tread on carpets, passed by the bier,
awe-struck.
One such Royal Funeral as I had previously seen was not essentially
different from another. The outdoor ceremonial at the interment of George the Third was not readily to be forgotten. It was a walking
procession. The night was dark and misty. Vast crowds were assembled in the Lower Ward of
the Castle, hushed and expectant. A platform had been erected from the Grand Entrance of
the Castle to the Western Entrance of St. George’s Chapel. It was lined on each side
by a single file of the Guards. A signal-rocket is fired. Every soldier lights a torch,
Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 233 |
and the massive towers and the delicate pinnacles stand out in the red
glare. Minute guns are now heard in the distance. Will those startling voices never cease?
Expectation is at its height. A flourish of trumpets is heard, and then the roll of muffled
drums. A solemn dirge comes upon the ear, nearer and nearer. The funeral-car glides slowly
along the platform without any perceptible aid from human or mechanical power. The dirge
ceases for a little while; and then again the trumpets and the muffled drums sound
alternately. Again the dirge—softly breathing flutes and clarionets mingling their notes
with “the mellow horn”—and then a dead silence; for the final
resting-place is reached. Heralds and banners and escutcheons touch not the heart. But the
Music! That is something grander than the picturesque.
Robert Battiscombe (1754 c.-1839)
Apothecary at Windsor; the royal family were among his patients.
William Thomas Beckford (1760-1844)
English novelist and aesthete, son of the Jamaica planter and Lord Mayor William Beckford
(1709-1770), author of
Vathek: An Arabian Tale, surreptitiously
translated and published in 1786. He was MP for Wells (1784-90) and Hindon (1790-94,
1806-20).
Andrew Bell (1753-1832)
Scottish Episcopalian educated at St. Andrews University; he was the founder of the
“Madras” system of education by mutual instruction; Robert Southey was his
biographer.
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
The founder of Utilitarianism; author of
Principles of Morals and
Legislation (1789).
Charles William Shirley Brooks (1816-1880)
The son of the architect William Brooks, he was a journalist and playwright who
contributed to
Punch and
Ainsworth's
Magazine.
William Brooks (1786-1867)
English architect and social reformer who designed the London Institution; he was the
father of Shirley Brooks of
Punch.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
John Campbell, first baron Campbell (1779-1861)
Barrister and biographer; he was a liberal MP for Stafford (1830-32), Dudley (1832-34),
and Edinburgh (1834-41); created Baron Campbell (1841), lord chancellor (1859).
Queen Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (1768-1821)
Married the Prince of Wales in 1795 and separated in 1796; her husband instituted
unsuccessful divorce proceedings in 1820 when she refused to surrender her rights as
queen.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
William Collins (1721-1759)
English poet, author of
Persian Eclogues (1742),
Odes on Several Descriptive and Allegorical Subjects (1746), and
Ode on the Popular Superstitions of the Highlands (1788).
Elizabeth Cooper [née Price] (1698 c.-1761 c.)
English playwright, actress, and bookseller who with the assistance of William Oldys
produced an important anthology of early English poetry,
The Muses
Library (1737).
Sir William Curtis, first baronet (1752-1829)
A banker and friend of George IV; he was Lord Mayor of London (1795) and as Tory MP for
London (1790-1818) was a target of Whig mockery.
Michael Drayton (1563-1631)
English poet, the imitator of Spenser and friend of Ben Jonson; he published
Poly-Olbion (1612).
Maria Edgeworth (1768-1849)
Irish novelist; author of
Castle Rackrent (1800)
Belinda (1801),
The Absentee (1812) and
Ormond (1817).
Edward Augustus, duke of Kent (1767-1820)
The fourth son of George III, who pursued a military career and acquired a reputation as
a martinet; he was governor of Gibraltar (1802-03).
George Edwards (1787 c.-1843)
English sculptor at Eton and London; he was the government spy who betrayed Arthur
Thistlewood and broke up the Cato Street Conspiracy.
Edward Fairfax (1568 c.-1635 c.)
In 1600 he translated Tasso as
Godfrey of Bulloigne.
Frederick Augustus, Duke of York (1763-1827)
He was commander-in-chief of the Army, 1798-1809, until his removal on account of the
scandal involving his mistress Mary Anne Clarke.
Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
German composer; his popular oratorio
The Seasons set texts by the
poet James Thomson.
George Herbert (1593-1633)
English clergyman and devotional poet; his poetry was posthumously published as
The Temple in 1633.
Robert Herrick (1591-1674)
Cavalier lyric poet and epigrammaticist, the author of
Hesperides
(1648).
John Hoole (1727-1803)
English translator, playwright, and friend of Dr. Johnson; he published
Jerusalem Delivered (1763), an often-reprinted translation reviled by the
romantics.
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
English man of letters, among many other works he edited
A Dictionary
of the English Language (1755) and Shakespeare (1765), and wrote
Lives of the Poets (1779-81).
Edmund Kean (1787-1833)
English tragic actor famous for his Shakespearean roles.
John Keate (1773-1852)
Headmaster at Eton College (1809-1834) and canon of Windsor; he had a reputation as a
flogger.
John Keats (1795-1821)
English poet, author of
Endymion, "The Eve of St. Agnes," and
other poems, who died of tuberculosis in Rome.
Joseph Lancaster (1778-1838)
Founder of the Lancastrian system of education; he published
Improvements in Education (1803).
Edward Hawke Locker (1777-1849)
Secretary to the Royal Naval Hospital, Greenwich (1819); he was a painter, editor of
The Plain Englishman (1820-30) and a friend of Robert Southey and
Sir Walter Scott.
Francis Charles Parry (1780-1878)
Educated at Winchester, University College, Oxford, and the Middle Temple, he was
commissioner of bankrupts (1810-31) and a contributor to the
Edinburgh
Review.
Plotinus (204 c.-270)
The author of
Enneads and founder of the neoplatonic school of
philosophy.
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Jane Porter (1776-1850)
English novelist, sister of the poet and novelist Anna Maria Porter (1778-1832); she
wrote
The Scottish Chiefs (1810).
Proclus (412-485)
Neoplatonic philosopher who wrote a commentary on Plato's
Timaeus.
Sir Samuel Romilly (1757-1818)
Reformer of the penal code and the author of
Thoughts on Executive
Justice (1786); he was a Whig MP and Solicitor-General who died a suicide.
Samuel Weller Singer (1783-1858)
English antiquary and bookseller; he wrote biographies of English poets for the
Chiswick British Poets, edited
Spence's
Anecdotes (1820) in a rival edition to Murray's, and contributed to the
Literary Gazette.
Sydney Smith (1771-1845)
Clergyman, wit, and one of the original projectors of the
Edinburgh
Review; afterwards lecturer in London and one of the Holland House
denizens.
Robert Stephenson (1803-1859)
English civil engineer who studied at Edinburgh University and designed railroads and
bridges.
George Steevens (1736-1800)
English antiquary, malicious wit, and editor of a standard edition of Shakespeare's
Works (1773, etc).
Torquato Tasso (1554-1595)
Italian poet, author of
Aminta (1573), a pastoral drama, and
Jerusalem Delivered (1580).
Sir Herbert Taylor (1775-1839)
He was aide-de-camp and private secretary to the duke of York, afterwards to George III
and William IV; he was MP for Windsor (1820-23) and published
Memoirs of
the Last Illness and Decease of HRH the Duke of York (1827).
Thomas Taylor [the Platonist] (1758-1835)
Bank-clerk and dissenter whose lectures on Platonic philosophy at the house of the
sculptor John Flaxman gained him the title of “the Platonist.” He spent his later years as
a professional translator.
Arthur Thistlewood (1774-1820)
English radical and disciple of Thomas Spence; he was hanged after the exposure of an
assassination plot against the British cabinet.
William Upcott (1779-1845)
English bookseller, collector, and librarian at the London Institution (1806-34). He
wrote for the
Literary Gazette.
Benjamin West (1738-1820)
American-born historical painter who traveled to Europe in 1760 and was one of the
founders of the Royal Academy in London.
George Wither (1588-1667)
Prolific Puritan poet and satirist who became a byword for bad poetry; during the
eighteenth century his more attractive youthful verse began to be reprinted and
admired.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.