Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
        Chapter V
        
        
          
        
        
          
        
       
      
      
      
      
     
    
    ![]() 
     CHAPTER V. 
    
    
    AT this period, when I was working energetically at parish
                        affairs in addition to my ordinary business, I was equally busied with literary schemes.
                        The practical and the ideal had possession of my mind at one and the same time, and had no
                        contention for superiority. I may truly say—and I say it for the encouragement of any young
                        man who is sighing over the fetters of his daily labour, and pining for weeks and months of
                        uninterrupted study—that I have found through life that the acquisition of knowledge, and a
                        regular course of literary employment, are far from being incompatible with commercial
                        pursuits. I doubt whether, if I had been all author or all publisher, I should have
                        succeeded better in either capacity. It is true that these my occupations were homogeneous;
                        but I question whether that condition is necessary in any case—in a lawyer’s, for
                        example—where there is sufficient elasticity of mind to turn readily out of the main line
                        to the loop-line (how could I have expressed this in the days before Stephenson?), and sufficient steadiness of purpose to
                        return to it. In my time of humble journalism at Windsor, I was constantly devising some
                        magnificent scheme of books that I thought the world wanted; in which opinion, it is most
                        probable, I should have found no encourager in the cautious experience of “The
                        Row” or ![]()
| 206 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() in the venturous liberality of Albemarle Street. One
                        small project I earned out myself without commercial aid.
 in the venturous liberality of Albemarle Street. One
                        small project I earned out myself without commercial aid. 
    
    Keats has described his acquaintance with our grand
                        old poets: 
|  “Oft had I travell’d in the realms of gold.”  | 
![]() Now and then I came across a volume which I could take up again and again, even whilst
                            Byron was stimulating me with his “Corsair” and his “Giaour,” and whilst Wordsworth was awakening a more profound sense of the
                        higher objects of poetry. Such a volume was Shakspere’s “Sonnets,” rarely published with the Plays, and known only to a few
                        enthusiasts who did not believe, with Steevens, that
                        they were sentimental rubbish. Such was “England’s Parnassus,” which I borrowed, and longed to appropriate.
                        No publisher had then thought it worth while to reprint Drayton, or Wither, or Herrick, or Herbert. The delight which Keats expressed in his noble
                            Sonnet upon the discovery of
                            Chapman’s “Homer” was mine, when I first lighted upon
                            Fairfax’s “Tasso.” I had entered a new realm of gold. To me
                        that small folio—the first edition, revised by Fairfax himself—was a
                        precious treasure. There had been no edition of the book for seventy years. Resolved that I
                        would achieve the honour of reprinting it, I issued an Advertisement, in October, 1817, in
                        which I said, “Dr. Johnson, with somewhat
                            of his characteristic temerity, ventured to predict that the ‘Tasso’ of Fairfax would
                            never be reprinted. If the national taste in poetry had not mended since the days of
                            that critic, his prophetic flattery of Hoole
                            would not yet have been disproved.” The produc-
 Now and then I came across a volume which I could take up again and again, even whilst
                            Byron was stimulating me with his “Corsair” and his “Giaour,” and whilst Wordsworth was awakening a more profound sense of the
                        higher objects of poetry. Such a volume was Shakspere’s “Sonnets,” rarely published with the Plays, and known only to a few
                        enthusiasts who did not believe, with Steevens, that
                        they were sentimental rubbish. Such was “England’s Parnassus,” which I borrowed, and longed to appropriate.
                        No publisher had then thought it worth while to reprint Drayton, or Wither, or Herrick, or Herbert. The delight which Keats expressed in his noble
                            Sonnet upon the discovery of
                            Chapman’s “Homer” was mine, when I first lighted upon
                            Fairfax’s “Tasso.” I had entered a new realm of gold. To me
                        that small folio—the first edition, revised by Fairfax himself—was a
                        precious treasure. There had been no edition of the book for seventy years. Resolved that I
                        would achieve the honour of reprinting it, I issued an Advertisement, in October, 1817, in
                        which I said, “Dr. Johnson, with somewhat
                            of his characteristic temerity, ventured to predict that the ‘Tasso’ of Fairfax would
                            never be reprinted. If the national taste in poetry had not mended since the days of
                            that critic, his prophetic flattery of Hoole
                            would not yet have been disproved.” The produc-![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 207 | 
![]() tion of
                            two small volumes at our
                        Windsor Press of the exquisite translation that had been forgotten since Collins had rejoiced to hear
                            Tasso’s harp “by English
                                Fairfax strung,” was received by a few critics as
                        creditable to the taste of a country printer. The editing of this volume was a pleasant
                        occupation to me. I prefixed to it a Life of Tasso, and a Life of
                            Fairfax. In that of Fairfax I inserted an
                        Eclogue which was first printed in Mrs.
                            Cooper’s “Muses’ Library”—a volume which had become scarce, and which I found
                        at the London Institution. Mr. Upcott was then the
                        librarian in the new building, which, in its handsome elevation and its judicious interior
                        arrangements, did credit to the architect, then a young man—Mr.
                            William Brooks, the father of Mr. Shirley
                            Brooks. My reprint appeared a little before that of Mr. Singer; or probably I might have shrunk from the
                        competition.
tion of
                            two small volumes at our
                        Windsor Press of the exquisite translation that had been forgotten since Collins had rejoiced to hear
                            Tasso’s harp “by English
                                Fairfax strung,” was received by a few critics as
                        creditable to the taste of a country printer. The editing of this volume was a pleasant
                        occupation to me. I prefixed to it a Life of Tasso, and a Life of
                            Fairfax. In that of Fairfax I inserted an
                        Eclogue which was first printed in Mrs.
                            Cooper’s “Muses’ Library”—a volume which had become scarce, and which I found
                        at the London Institution. Mr. Upcott was then the
                        librarian in the new building, which, in its handsome elevation and its judicious interior
                        arrangements, did credit to the architect, then a young man—Mr.
                            William Brooks, the father of Mr. Shirley
                            Brooks. My reprint appeared a little before that of Mr. Singer; or probably I might have shrunk from the
                        competition. 
    
     Every now and then, however, my newspaper opened subjects of a new and
                        interesting character, which engaged my attention for a time. Such was the question of
                        inquiry into the Endowed Charities of the country, which in 1818 had assumed a national
                        importance. By the strenuous exertions of Mr. Brougham
                        a Commission was appointed—first to inquire into charities connected with Education, and
                        then into all charities. Pending the results of this investigation, a volume was published
                        by a member of the Bar, Mr. Francis Charles Parry,
                        on the Charities of Berkshire. Such an account as this gentleman collected, somewhat too
                        full of vague charges of abuses, determined me to undertake a really useful labour—that of
                        carefully searching all the documents relating to the charities ![]()
| 208 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() of
                        Windsor, and of publishing them in the most complete form in my newspaper. It was an honour
                        to my native town that no information was withheld from me; and that I could discover no
                        misappropriation of bequests, and no violation of “the will of the founder.”
                        Nor was there any example of that species of legal construction of “the will of the
                        founder” which has built up the magnificence of many of the London Companies. Vast
                        are their rent-rolls. In days when houses and lands were not worth a twentieth part of
                        their present nominal value, these magnates became the inheritors of many a fertile acre
                        and many an improveable tenement, in trust that they should pay, for defined charitable
                        purposes, a particular amount of pounds sterling, annually and for ever—probably the then
                        rent of those lands and houses leaving something for needful charges. The rents of the
                        fourteenth, or fifteenth, or sixteenth centuries—the defined sums—are justly paid. The
                        surplus of the rents of the nineteenth century, increased twenty-fold or even fifty-fold,
                        are partially employed for useful purposes; but they go very far towards the cost of the
                        turtle and loving-cups upon which so much of the public welfare depends. Though Windsor had
                        no flagrant abuses, a few of our charities furnished an example of the necessity of giving
                        large powers to Charity Commissioners, if not for authorizing the Government, to deal with
                        some benevolent provisions of ancient times in a way better adapted to the wants of modern
                        society. But the greater number were not wholly for past generations in their usefulness.
                        There was a Free School, with a considerable permanent income, where fifty boys and girls
                        were educated and clothed.
 of
                        Windsor, and of publishing them in the most complete form in my newspaper. It was an honour
                        to my native town that no information was withheld from me; and that I could discover no
                        misappropriation of bequests, and no violation of “the will of the founder.”
                        Nor was there any example of that species of legal construction of “the will of the
                        founder” which has built up the magnificence of many of the London Companies. Vast
                        are their rent-rolls. In days when houses and lands were not worth a twentieth part of
                        their present nominal value, these magnates became the inheritors of many a fertile acre
                        and many an improveable tenement, in trust that they should pay, for defined charitable
                        purposes, a particular amount of pounds sterling, annually and for ever—probably the then
                        rent of those lands and houses leaving something for needful charges. The rents of the
                        fourteenth, or fifteenth, or sixteenth centuries—the defined sums—are justly paid. The
                        surplus of the rents of the nineteenth century, increased twenty-fold or even fifty-fold,
                        are partially employed for useful purposes; but they go very far towards the cost of the
                        turtle and loving-cups upon which so much of the public welfare depends. Though Windsor had
                        no flagrant abuses, a few of our charities furnished an example of the necessity of giving
                        large powers to Charity Commissioners, if not for authorizing the Government, to deal with
                        some benevolent provisions of ancient times in a way better adapted to the wants of modern
                        society. But the greater number were not wholly for past generations in their usefulness.
                        There was a Free School, with a considerable permanent income, where fifty boys and girls
                        were educated and clothed. ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 209 | 
![]() It did not belong to the then much abused
                        class of Grammar Schools—of which there were several specimens within my knowledge—where
                        the clergyman, who was also the schoolmaster, put the funds into his pocket because the
                        farmers’ and labourers’ sons did not want to learn Latin. The poor children of
                        our borough were taught those humble accomplishments which Sir
                            William Curtis eulogised as the three Rs—Reading, Riting, and Rithmetic.
                        With the aid of supplementary endowments for Apprenticing Poor Boys and Rewarding Diligent
                        Apprentices, many of these lads became thriving tradesmen. I could point to one man whom I
                        am proud to call my friend, who came to my father to be apprenticed with his blue livery on
                        his back; received the reward upon the faithful completion of his indentures; pursued the
                        trade on his own account in which he had been a valuable assistant; is now not unknown to
                        the world, as having, before the days of railroads, organised a newspaper-system which
                        fought against space and time to give the earliest intelligence to the Liverpool Exchange;
                        and has become himself a newspaper proprietor, and one of the chief mediums for the
                        journalistic communication between England and her Colonies as well as with North and South
                        America. Honoured be the memory of Archbishop Laud,
                        who by his will thus made provision not only for the apprenticeship of “children
                            of honest poor people;” but laid the foundations of their future prosperity.
                        Many a young woman, through his provident care, has kept her position in “the
                            faithful service of the antique world,” and has not rushed into premature
                        wedlock, sustained by the hope of receiving a marriage-portion on the condition of having
 It did not belong to the then much abused
                        class of Grammar Schools—of which there were several specimens within my knowledge—where
                        the clergyman, who was also the schoolmaster, put the funds into his pocket because the
                        farmers’ and labourers’ sons did not want to learn Latin. The poor children of
                        our borough were taught those humble accomplishments which Sir
                            William Curtis eulogised as the three Rs—Reading, Riting, and Rithmetic.
                        With the aid of supplementary endowments for Apprenticing Poor Boys and Rewarding Diligent
                        Apprentices, many of these lads became thriving tradesmen. I could point to one man whom I
                        am proud to call my friend, who came to my father to be apprenticed with his blue livery on
                        his back; received the reward upon the faithful completion of his indentures; pursued the
                        trade on his own account in which he had been a valuable assistant; is now not unknown to
                        the world, as having, before the days of railroads, organised a newspaper-system which
                        fought against space and time to give the earliest intelligence to the Liverpool Exchange;
                        and has become himself a newspaper proprietor, and one of the chief mediums for the
                        journalistic communication between England and her Colonies as well as with North and South
                        America. Honoured be the memory of Archbishop Laud,
                        who by his will thus made provision not only for the apprenticeship of “children
                            of honest poor people;” but laid the foundations of their future prosperity.
                        Many a young woman, through his provident care, has kept her position in “the
                            faithful service of the antique world,” and has not rushed into premature
                        wedlock, sustained by the hope of receiving a marriage-portion on the condition of having
                            ![]()
| 210 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() served the same master or mistress for three years. Let us cherish
                        the memory of Laud for the sake of his Berkshire Charities. What
                        matters it to us that we have outgrown his politics and his polemics! May we never, in
                        dreams of universal philanthropy, believe that we are growing in true philosophy when we
                        attempt to exclude individual sympathies for the lowly by larger aspirations for the human
                        race. Above all, let us not presume to obliterate the Past, by turning aside from those who
                        have helped, each according to his lights, to build up a wider Present—erring
                        men—short-sighted—enemies to progress in the abstract, but nevertheless, in their practical
                        benevolence, working for the “one increasing purpose” of human
                        improvement. The time, I trust, is very distant, when some pragmatical reformer, armed with
                        mere utilitarian weapons of tables and estimates, may persuade the Legislature that it can
                        do better than continue such bequests as those of Laud, conceived in the ancient spirit of
                        making charitable provision for the few. The prizes, however unequally distributed, are the
                        best encouragements for the many. I used to compare the beneficial effects of
                            Laud’s benevolence, with the positively injurious results of
                        doles of bread “after Sunday morning service.” We had nine different bequests
                        for giving bread to the poor—five of them willed in the seventeenth century, and four in
                        the eighteenth. There were two centuries between the first endowment for “bread to
                        the poor” in 1603 and the last in 1803. Had the loaves at the church-door succeeded
                        the dole at the Monastery-gate? These periods did not embrace the golden age of abundance
                        for all, which some imagine was once the condition of a happy
 served the same master or mistress for three years. Let us cherish
                        the memory of Laud for the sake of his Berkshire Charities. What
                        matters it to us that we have outgrown his politics and his polemics! May we never, in
                        dreams of universal philanthropy, believe that we are growing in true philosophy when we
                        attempt to exclude individual sympathies for the lowly by larger aspirations for the human
                        race. Above all, let us not presume to obliterate the Past, by turning aside from those who
                        have helped, each according to his lights, to build up a wider Present—erring
                        men—short-sighted—enemies to progress in the abstract, but nevertheless, in their practical
                        benevolence, working for the “one increasing purpose” of human
                        improvement. The time, I trust, is very distant, when some pragmatical reformer, armed with
                        mere utilitarian weapons of tables and estimates, may persuade the Legislature that it can
                        do better than continue such bequests as those of Laud, conceived in the ancient spirit of
                        making charitable provision for the few. The prizes, however unequally distributed, are the
                        best encouragements for the many. I used to compare the beneficial effects of
                            Laud’s benevolence, with the positively injurious results of
                        doles of bread “after Sunday morning service.” We had nine different bequests
                        for giving bread to the poor—five of them willed in the seventeenth century, and four in
                        the eighteenth. There were two centuries between the first endowment for “bread to
                        the poor” in 1603 and the last in 1803. Had the loaves at the church-door succeeded
                        the dole at the Monastery-gate? These periods did not embrace the golden age of abundance
                        for all, which some imagine was once the condition of a happy ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 211 | 
![]() people.
                        Forty-eight poor persons regularly attended our parish church on the Sunday morning, drawn
                        thither, I fear, more by the prospect of the half-quartern loaf than by a hungering for
                            “the bread of life.” Such almsgiving is, of all others, the most
                        destructive of the self-respect of the recipients. I would not care to preserve these
                        endowments; nor that other very perplexing one of Six Pounds, to be distributed amongst
                        twelve of “the godliest poor of Windsor.” Our Spinning Charity, which
                        had endured for two centuries, has, I find, come to an end, as it was difficult to obtain
                        people to work at spinning. (“Annals of
                            Windsor,” vol. ii. p. 425.) Year after year the old spinners had died out;
                        there were no young spinners to succeed; and the very name of “spinster” had
                        become obsolete, except in the publication of banns of marriage. The almswomen, inhabiting
                        five or six different blocks of houses in various parts of the town, kept up as well as
                        they could this unprofitable labour. The words of the first bequest of 1621 were, that
                            “the poor might be continually employed in the making of cloth.” The
                        convictions of the pious persons who bequeathed their lands and houses for an artificial
                        stimulus of industry furnish a sufficient example of the state of the country, when the
                        ordinary operations of capital were insufficient to adjust the relations of demand and
                        supply. The age of domestic manufactures was certainly not one of general prosperity. The
                        machinery in our town for prolonging the primitive system was curious. Imagine a busy
                        corporator, even forty years ago when all worked less, occupied, first, in buying a store
                        of flax; secondly, in giving it out, pound by pound, to the old crones who could still keep
                        the
 people.
                        Forty-eight poor persons regularly attended our parish church on the Sunday morning, drawn
                        thither, I fear, more by the prospect of the half-quartern loaf than by a hungering for
                            “the bread of life.” Such almsgiving is, of all others, the most
                        destructive of the self-respect of the recipients. I would not care to preserve these
                        endowments; nor that other very perplexing one of Six Pounds, to be distributed amongst
                        twelve of “the godliest poor of Windsor.” Our Spinning Charity, which
                        had endured for two centuries, has, I find, come to an end, as it was difficult to obtain
                        people to work at spinning. (“Annals of
                            Windsor,” vol. ii. p. 425.) Year after year the old spinners had died out;
                        there were no young spinners to succeed; and the very name of “spinster” had
                        become obsolete, except in the publication of banns of marriage. The almswomen, inhabiting
                        five or six different blocks of houses in various parts of the town, kept up as well as
                        they could this unprofitable labour. The words of the first bequest of 1621 were, that
                            “the poor might be continually employed in the making of cloth.” The
                        convictions of the pious persons who bequeathed their lands and houses for an artificial
                        stimulus of industry furnish a sufficient example of the state of the country, when the
                        ordinary operations of capital were insufficient to adjust the relations of demand and
                        supply. The age of domestic manufactures was certainly not one of general prosperity. The
                        machinery in our town for prolonging the primitive system was curious. Imagine a busy
                        corporator, even forty years ago when all worked less, occupied, first, in buying a store
                        of flax; secondly, in giving it out, pound by pound, to the old crones who could still keep
                        the ![]()
| 212 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() wheel at work; thirdly, in weighing the yarn when returned, and
                        paying at a fixed rate, however ill the labour was performed; fourthly, in making the best
                        arrangement he could for having it woven, in a part of the country where the weaver’s
                        shuttle had gone out even before the spinning-wheel. Lucky was the almswoman who enjoyed a
                        bequest omitted in the charity records. An ancient lady was inspired to accomplish one of
                        the objects of Pope’s satire—
 wheel at work; thirdly, in weighing the yarn when returned, and
                        paying at a fixed rate, however ill the labour was performed; fourthly, in making the best
                        arrangement he could for having it woven, in a part of the country where the weaver’s
                        shuttle had gone out even before the spinning-wheel. Lucky was the almswoman who enjoyed a
                        bequest omitted in the charity records. An ancient lady was inspired to accomplish one of
                        the objects of Pope’s satire—|  “Die and endow a college or a cat.”  | 
![]() The cat had lived through nine lives in my time; but I presume she is not immortal.
 The cat had lived through nine lives in my time; but I presume she is not immortal. 
    
     Social Science in 1818 had a very small attendance of disciples in her
                        schools. For an inquiring few, she had her Primers and her Junior Class Books; and in her
                        inner courts for the initiated, Bentham was
                        preaching in a language the farthest removed from popular comprehension. Romilly, in the House of Commons, had been labouring for
                        ten years to amend the Criminal Laws. His valuable life was closed prematurely before he
                        had achieved any marked victory over the system under which the death penalty was
                        capriciously enforced, to inspire “a vague terror” amongst the whole
                        criminal population. The prisons were nurseries of crime. The detective police were amongst
                        crime’s chief encouragers. Forgery nourished above all other crimes, for the
                        Government offered the temptation whilst they unsparingly hanged the tempted. The Game Laws
                        raised up pilfering peasants into gangs of brigands. Smuggling was nurtured into the
                        dignity of commercial enterprise, by protective duties so absurdly high that a wall ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 213 | 
![]() of brass could not have kept out the brandies and lace and silk that
                        the Continent was ready to pour in. The great bulk of the population was wholly ignorant
                        and partly brutal. The Church had not awakened from its long sleep. If the schoolmaster was
                        abroad, he was rather seeking for work than doing it. Looking as a journalist upon our
                        social condition, I was sometimes unhappy and desponding. My dissatisfaction found a vent
                        in letters from an imaginary correspondent:—
 of brass could not have kept out the brandies and lace and silk that
                        the Continent was ready to pour in. The great bulk of the population was wholly ignorant
                        and partly brutal. The Church had not awakened from its long sleep. If the schoolmaster was
                        abroad, he was rather seeking for work than doing it. Looking as a journalist upon our
                        social condition, I was sometimes unhappy and desponding. My dissatisfaction found a vent
                        in letters from an imaginary correspondent:— 
    
     “The prevailing feeling which a newspaper excites in my breast,
                            without the indulgence of any sickly sensibility, is that of melancholy. It presents a
                            gloomy portrait of our species. It is a living herald of the bad passions of
                            individuals and the mistakes of society. It discovers little of the better part of
                            mankind, for the most elevated virtue is the most unobtrusive. The atmosphere of vice
                            is a broad and visible darkness overspreading the land, through which the gaunt
                            spectres of crime glare fearfully upon us. The newspaper applies its microscopic eyes
                            to these miserable objects; like Tam
                                O’Shanter, it looks upon their secret revels—it notes every
                            movement of the infuriated dance; it traces the progress of evil from its mazy
                            beginning to its horrible close; it anatomizes the deformities of the heart, and
                            encases them for public exhibition. Should these spectacles be withheld from the
                            general eye? Unquestionably not. They administer, indeed, to that love of strong
                            excitement which characterizes the human mind in every state, but which operates most
                            powerfully upon a highly refined community—and so far they are mischievous. But still
                            they have a voice of edification. They ![]()
| 214 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() summon us all to the labour
                            of opposing that flood of iniquity which threatens to break down the dykes and mounds
                            of our social institutions; they call us to eradicate the canker which interrupts the
                            natural spring of moral health. The evil is in the root. The institutions for the
                            prevention and punishment of crime are founded upon a wrong view of human nature; they
                            have a direct tendency to confirm and multiply the effects of depraved ignorance.
 summon us all to the labour
                            of opposing that flood of iniquity which threatens to break down the dykes and mounds
                            of our social institutions; they call us to eradicate the canker which interrupts the
                            natural spring of moral health. The evil is in the root. The institutions for the
                            prevention and punishment of crime are founded upon a wrong view of human nature; they
                            have a direct tendency to confirm and multiply the effects of depraved ignorance.
                    
    
     “Your weekly ‘map of busy life’ reaches me in the
                            solitude of the most beautiful and the least visited part of Windsor Forest. This
                            morning I rose ere the sun had lighted the autumnal foliage with a brighter yellow and
                            a richer brown. My walk was in the silent woods. All around me was cheerfulness. The
                            birds of song were pouring forth their instinctive gratitude for returning day—the
                            noisy rooks had a spirit of gladness in their whirling flights—the graceful deer glided
                            before me with fearless nimbleness. My heart expanded at the enjoyments of these humble
                            beings. Surely, I exclaimed, every creature that lives in conformity to its nature is
                            happy. I returned to my home. Your journal was on my breakfast-table. The calendar of
                            the ‘Old Bailey’ met my view. I read of the condemnation of thirty-five
                            persons to the penalty of death, and of nearly two hundred to lesser degrees of
                            punishment. I considered that these scenes are repeated every six weeks!* The
                            impressions of my morning walk had a redoubled force. I felt assured that man was not
                            destined to crime and misery. 
| 
  * The Central Criminal Court was not established till 1834.
                                    The Sessions of the Old Bailey, previous to that change, were held eight times
                                    a year for the trial of offences committed in Middlesex.  | 
![]() 
                            ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 215 | 
![]() Are, then, these penal modes of counteracting the corruptions of
                            society suggested by reason and benevolence?”
 Are, then, these penal modes of counteracting the corruptions of
                            society suggested by reason and benevolence?” 
    
     I believe that at this period I got into a morbid state of mind, by thinking
                        too much of 
|  “the heavy and the weary weight   Of all this unintelligible world.”  | 
![]() I had no large and definite object of ambition. My occupations were not engrossing
                        enough to carry me away from dreamy speculations. I pored over the Platonic writers,
                            Proclus and Plotinus, in Taylor’s
                        translations; and accepted the philosophy of which Coleridge was the modern expositor, as far nobler than the doctrine of
                        ideas derived from sensation. I sometimes thought that the great mysteries of human life
                        were clearing up; and then again I relapsed into bewilderment. May I venture to dig out
                        from its recesses a sonnet which represents my state of mind at this crisis, when the
                        blessing of the primal curse was not sufficiently laid upon me?—
 I had no large and definite object of ambition. My occupations were not engrossing
                        enough to carry me away from dreamy speculations. I pored over the Platonic writers,
                            Proclus and Plotinus, in Taylor’s
                        translations; and accepted the philosophy of which Coleridge was the modern expositor, as far nobler than the doctrine of
                        ideas derived from sensation. I sometimes thought that the great mysteries of human life
                        were clearing up; and then again I relapsed into bewilderment. May I venture to dig out
                        from its recesses a sonnet which represents my state of mind at this crisis, when the
                        blessing of the primal curse was not sufficiently laid upon me?— |  “Unquiet thoughts, ye wind about my heart   In many-tangled webs. My daily toil,   The obstinate cares of life, the vain turmoil   Of getting dross and spending, bear their part   In this entanglement; and if my mind   Shake off its chains, and, free as mountain-wind,   Repose on Nature’s pure maternal breast,   Interpreting her fresh and innocent looks   Discoursing truth and love clearer than books,   Thoughts are still weaving webs of my unrest.   O grant me, Wisdom, to behold thee near,   Deep, clear, reveal’d as one all-perfect whole;   Or give me back the sleep to worldlings dear—   Thy glimmerings disturb my heated soul.”  | 
![]() 
                    
    
     Turning from metaphysics to hard realities, and looking upon the apparently
                        interminable warfare ![]()
| 216 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() between Ignorance and Power, I could perceive
                        very few reconciling principles of social policy, or influential mediators between the
                        lawless and the governing classes. The King’s Proclamation was duly recited by the
                        Town Clerk at our Borough Sessions; and as duly did our old Town-Serjeant produce a laugh
                        when he called for silence whilst “his Majesty’s Proclamation against all
                            Wice, Perfaneness, and Immorality, was openly read.” I doubt whether His
                        Majesty’s Proclamation, which had been prescribed as a remedy for social evils at the
                        beginning of his reign, was very effective after an experience of sixty years. Drunkenness
                        in our humbler classes was not discouraged by any marked temperance of their superiors,
                        especially of the elder generation. There was a whole street of a vicious population, where
                        almost every house was a den of infamy. At the bottom of this foul quarter stood our gaol—a
                        gaol built by George the Third upon the most approved
                        plans of the Surveyor-General,—which contained no means whatever of enforcing hard labour.
                        Offenders were sometimes flogged at the cart-tail through our streets, amidst the hootings
                        of the populace when the gaoler, who was the executioner, struck hard. There were no
                        instruments for the prevention of crime but our ancient watchmen, and the one beadle,
                        parading the town in his laced coat. In the open day, an informer—that most detestable to
                        the mob of the instruments for enforcing our then abominable fiscal laws—was set upon, and
                        nearly killed, whilst the constable’s staff hung quietly upon its peg in the shop of
                        the annual officer. The law did little for the prevention of outrage and felony. Public
                        opinion looked on, and held its tongue; for to attempt
 between Ignorance and Power, I could perceive
                        very few reconciling principles of social policy, or influential mediators between the
                        lawless and the governing classes. The King’s Proclamation was duly recited by the
                        Town Clerk at our Borough Sessions; and as duly did our old Town-Serjeant produce a laugh
                        when he called for silence whilst “his Majesty’s Proclamation against all
                            Wice, Perfaneness, and Immorality, was openly read.” I doubt whether His
                        Majesty’s Proclamation, which had been prescribed as a remedy for social evils at the
                        beginning of his reign, was very effective after an experience of sixty years. Drunkenness
                        in our humbler classes was not discouraged by any marked temperance of their superiors,
                        especially of the elder generation. There was a whole street of a vicious population, where
                        almost every house was a den of infamy. At the bottom of this foul quarter stood our gaol—a
                        gaol built by George the Third upon the most approved
                        plans of the Surveyor-General,—which contained no means whatever of enforcing hard labour.
                        Offenders were sometimes flogged at the cart-tail through our streets, amidst the hootings
                        of the populace when the gaoler, who was the executioner, struck hard. There were no
                        instruments for the prevention of crime but our ancient watchmen, and the one beadle,
                        parading the town in his laced coat. In the open day, an informer—that most detestable to
                        the mob of the instruments for enforcing our then abominable fiscal laws—was set upon, and
                        nearly killed, whilst the constable’s staff hung quietly upon its peg in the shop of
                        the annual officer. The law did little for the prevention of outrage and felony. Public
                        opinion looked on, and held its tongue; for to attempt ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 217 | 
![]() the reform of
                        abuses was the province only of wicked democrats called Radicals.
 the reform of
                        abuses was the province only of wicked democrats called Radicals. 
    
     We had established an Auxiliary Bible Society, in which I felt it a duty to
                        take an active part. I did so, not so much in the hope that the mere possession of the
                        Scriptures would produce any signal good in an ignorant household, but in the persuasion
                        that this union in a common endeavour would soften down some of the differences between
                        Churchmen and Dissenters. In my earliest recollections, all Dissenters went by the generic
                        name of “Methodists;” and the vulgar term of opprobrium for sectaries in the
                        palmy days of “Church and King” was “Pantilers.” I saw the
                        congregation of Independents gradually emerge from a miserable chapel in a squalid
                        neighbourhood, and plant themselves in the principal street, having as their minister a
                        sensible, humane, and tolerant man, not very learned, but something better. The Evangelical
                        Clergy did not scruple to fraternise with the more respectable Dissenters in works of
                        charity. The dignitaries of our colleges generally kept aloof, and looked upon the changing
                        aspects of the times with something like dread. 
    
     Although, as a journalist, I was impartial towards the Dissenters, I had
                        often to combat what I deemed their prejudices. I had been trained under George III. to regard the Sunday gatherings on the Terrace as
                        not only innocent but useful. When the Terrace was shut up, and people of all ranks crowded
                        to hear the bands in the Long Walk, I thought that this mode of enjoyment was a great deal
                        better than the back parlour or noisy tap-room of the public-house. The Dissenters thought
                        otherwise; and one of their body had ![]()
| 218 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() the indiscretion to circulate a
                        hand-bill from house to house, denouncing us all as Sabbath-breakers and worse than
                        heathens, in terms which, however familiar to Scotland, were comparatively new to Southern
                        England. I got into a controversy on this question which might have been better avoided.
                        But in other respects also I was a sinner. The congregation of Independents had not only
                        established themselves in the High Street, but had done so by purchasing our little
                        Theatre, endeared to us by so many recollections of the hearty merriment of the good old
                        King. The building was quickly metamorphosed into a Meeting House. There was little
                        encouragement for theatrical performances in Windsor, now there was an end of royal
                        patronage; for the fact of the residence of the Court at the Castle brought us under the
                        License of the Lord Chamberlain, which was granted only upon the condition that there
                        should be no plays enacted except during the vacations at Eton College. Nevertheless we
                        built a new Theatre at a large cost, with small dividends to the shareholders, of whom my
                        father was the principal. It was opened in August, 1815; and I wrote a Prologue, which was
                        not conciliatory towards the sectaries, who regarded our proceedings as highly criminal.
                        The time was far distant when Shakspere would be
                        quoted in the Dissenter’s pulpit. Our theatre was pretty and commodious; but the
                        manager could not draw audiences without stars. In 1817 I became acquainted with Edmund Kean, in his visits to Windsor at our Christmas
                        season. I was an enthusiastic admirer of his genius; and wrote most elaborate criticisms on
                        his Othello and Shylock, his Sir Giles Overreach and
                            Sir Edward Mortimer. I
 the indiscretion to circulate a
                        hand-bill from house to house, denouncing us all as Sabbath-breakers and worse than
                        heathens, in terms which, however familiar to Scotland, were comparatively new to Southern
                        England. I got into a controversy on this question which might have been better avoided.
                        But in other respects also I was a sinner. The congregation of Independents had not only
                        established themselves in the High Street, but had done so by purchasing our little
                        Theatre, endeared to us by so many recollections of the hearty merriment of the good old
                        King. The building was quickly metamorphosed into a Meeting House. There was little
                        encouragement for theatrical performances in Windsor, now there was an end of royal
                        patronage; for the fact of the residence of the Court at the Castle brought us under the
                        License of the Lord Chamberlain, which was granted only upon the condition that there
                        should be no plays enacted except during the vacations at Eton College. Nevertheless we
                        built a new Theatre at a large cost, with small dividends to the shareholders, of whom my
                        father was the principal. It was opened in August, 1815; and I wrote a Prologue, which was
                        not conciliatory towards the sectaries, who regarded our proceedings as highly criminal.
                        The time was far distant when Shakspere would be
                        quoted in the Dissenter’s pulpit. Our theatre was pretty and commodious; but the
                        manager could not draw audiences without stars. In 1817 I became acquainted with Edmund Kean, in his visits to Windsor at our Christmas
                        season. I was an enthusiastic admirer of his genius; and wrote most elaborate criticisms on
                        his Othello and Shylock, his Sir Giles Overreach and
                            Sir Edward Mortimer. I ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 219 | 
![]() had
                        often then what I considered the great privilege of supping with him after the play. He was
                        always surrounded by two or three followers who administered to his insatiable vanity in
                        the coarsest style; applauded to the echo his somewhat loose talk; and stimulated his
                        readiness to “make a night of it.” My unbounded admiration for the
                        talent of the actor was somewhat interrupted by a humiliating sense of the weakness of the
                        man. Nevertheless the attraction was irresistible as long as he strove to make himself
                        agreeable. How exquisitely he sang a pathetic ballad! The rich melody, the deep tenderness,
                        of his “Fly from the world, O Bessie, to me,” were to
                        live in my memory, in companionship with the exquisite music of his voice in his best days,
                        when he uttered upon the stage, in a way which no other actor has approached, the soliloquy
                        ending with “Othello’s occupation’s gone.”
 had
                        often then what I considered the great privilege of supping with him after the play. He was
                        always surrounded by two or three followers who administered to his insatiable vanity in
                        the coarsest style; applauded to the echo his somewhat loose talk; and stimulated his
                        readiness to “make a night of it.” My unbounded admiration for the
                        talent of the actor was somewhat interrupted by a humiliating sense of the weakness of the
                        man. Nevertheless the attraction was irresistible as long as he strove to make himself
                        agreeable. How exquisitely he sang a pathetic ballad! The rich melody, the deep tenderness,
                        of his “Fly from the world, O Bessie, to me,” were to
                        live in my memory, in companionship with the exquisite music of his voice in his best days,
                        when he uttered upon the stage, in a way which no other actor has approached, the soliloquy
                        ending with “Othello’s occupation’s gone.” 
    
     For one who was thus, naturally enough, considered by “the unco
                            gude” as a profane Journalist, I became somewhat oddly mixed up with serious
                        matters. The Church Building Society was at this period beginning to be active. We had to
                        build a new Church at Windsor—but not an additional church. Our old fabric—to which the
                            “Merry Wives” of the days of Elizabeth might have resorted with their pages to carry the Prayer Book—was
                        in danger of falling on our heads, although we had spent large sums in vamping it up. Then,
                        according to the fashion of that opening day for manufacturers of gaudy elevations,
                        perplexing plans, and fallacious estimates, we determined upon an architectural
                        competition. I was Secretary to our Church Building Committee. I there learnt—what will be
                        a mystery ![]()
| 220 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() to future generations—how jobbery and presumption were
                        covering the land with ecclesiastical edifices at once the most tasteless and the most
                        expensive. The old style of the early days of the King, when four brick walls, pierced with
                        half a dozen holes on each side for windows—the style that suited every public structure,
                        whether church, barrack, or hospital—was really less offensive than the new style of the
                        Regent, when the flimsy buttress was added to the bald shadowless walls, and the windows
                        became a corrupt mixture of every period from the Norman to the Tudor. For the rage was now
                        for Gothic, so called. We obtained one of this class of Churches, made to the received
                        pattern, at a preposterous cost for Bath stone and corresponding frippery; when we might
                        have had, for half the money, a plain erection of the heath stone of which Windsor Castle
                        is built, with more claim to mediaeval character, in its lancet-windows, sturdy buttresses,
                        and massive tower—altogether suited to the simple grandeur of the regal pile on our
                        hill’s summit.
 to future generations—how jobbery and presumption were
                        covering the land with ecclesiastical edifices at once the most tasteless and the most
                        expensive. The old style of the early days of the King, when four brick walls, pierced with
                        half a dozen holes on each side for windows—the style that suited every public structure,
                        whether church, barrack, or hospital—was really less offensive than the new style of the
                        Regent, when the flimsy buttress was added to the bald shadowless walls, and the windows
                        became a corrupt mixture of every period from the Norman to the Tudor. For the rage was now
                        for Gothic, so called. We obtained one of this class of Churches, made to the received
                        pattern, at a preposterous cost for Bath stone and corresponding frippery; when we might
                        have had, for half the money, a plain erection of the heath stone of which Windsor Castle
                        is built, with more claim to mediaeval character, in its lancet-windows, sturdy buttresses,
                        and massive tower—altogether suited to the simple grandeur of the regal pile on our
                        hill’s summit. 
    
     Society, as I then looked upon it with a very narrow range of view, was
                        decidedly in a transition state. Compared with my earlier remembrances, the middle classes
                        were becoming more refined and more luxurious. There was more elegance in their household
                        arrangements, and more expense. Their manners were less formal, their dress more natural.
                        Hair-powder had altogether gone out; the Hessian boot was in most cases superseded by the
                        boot under the trousers. Even the Queen’s old-fashioned apothecary no longer wore his spencer, which I used to consider an
                        essential part of the good man. There were only four queues left amongst us. The young ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 221 | 
![]() ladies had begun to be educated more with a view to accomplishments
                        than housekeeping utilities. There was a good deal of fuss in most houses if the daughters
                        were asked to play or sing; but some could go beyond “The Battle
                            of Prague.” I have even heard Haydn’s “Canzonets” given with
                        taste and feeling. But it was not yet a musical age. The piano disturbed the solemn
                        whist-players. At Church, none of the congregation, male or female, joined in the dull
                        Psalmody, but left it all to the charity children. The young women tittered when the old
                        clerk indulged in his established joke, by giving out the first words of the
                            Psalm—“Lord I who’s the happy man,”—in compliment to a bride
                        who hid her blushes under the white veil. Novel-reading was general. Miss Porter and Miss
                            Edgeworth and Mrs. Radcliffe still
                        held their ancient empire, and were not driven out by the Waverley Novels. Scott, as a poet, was almost forgotten in the passion for Byron; but Wordsworth was
                        scarcely known popularly. Upon the whole, though young men from a supper-party were
                        sometimes riotous in the streets, the old habit of drinking was yielding amongst the middle
                        classes to better influences. I think I may venture to say that there was not a
                        “fast” young lady amongst us; though there was a good deal of merriment, and a
                        country dance upon the carpet would often follow “a round game.” The times,
                        however, made most of us serious—more so than we used to be in the days when we defied only
                        a foreign enemy.
 ladies had begun to be educated more with a view to accomplishments
                        than housekeeping utilities. There was a good deal of fuss in most houses if the daughters
                        were asked to play or sing; but some could go beyond “The Battle
                            of Prague.” I have even heard Haydn’s “Canzonets” given with
                        taste and feeling. But it was not yet a musical age. The piano disturbed the solemn
                        whist-players. At Church, none of the congregation, male or female, joined in the dull
                        Psalmody, but left it all to the charity children. The young women tittered when the old
                        clerk indulged in his established joke, by giving out the first words of the
                            Psalm—“Lord I who’s the happy man,”—in compliment to a bride
                        who hid her blushes under the white veil. Novel-reading was general. Miss Porter and Miss
                            Edgeworth and Mrs. Radcliffe still
                        held their ancient empire, and were not driven out by the Waverley Novels. Scott, as a poet, was almost forgotten in the passion for Byron; but Wordsworth was
                        scarcely known popularly. Upon the whole, though young men from a supper-party were
                        sometimes riotous in the streets, the old habit of drinking was yielding amongst the middle
                        classes to better influences. I think I may venture to say that there was not a
                        “fast” young lady amongst us; though there was a good deal of merriment, and a
                        country dance upon the carpet would often follow “a round game.” The times,
                        however, made most of us serious—more so than we used to be in the days when we defied only
                        a foreign enemy. 
    
     To the old dwellers in Windsor it had altogether become a changed place. The
                            Queen died in November, 1818. The Princesses—so
                        endeared to their ![]()
| 222 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() humble neighbours by unceasing acts of kindness, and
                        by a friendliness which took an interest even in the domestic circumstances of those around
                        them—were then dispersed. The great household of the Castle was broken up. The walk to
                        Datchet through the Upper Park was closed; and we sighed in vain for some sturdy patriot to
                        resist the innovation, after the fashion of “Timothy Bennet, of
                        Hampton Wick, in Middlesex, Shoemaker,” under whose engraved portrait, preserved in a
                        few houses, was thus inscribed: “This true Briton (unwilling to leave the world
                            worse than he found it), by a vigorous application of the laws of his country, obtained
                            a free passage through Bushy Park, which had many years been withheld from the
                            people.” The Regent had been gradually
                        patching up his Cottage in the Great Park, till his enormous thatched Palace might have
                        suggested the notion that it was an immense tithe-barn converted into a workhouse or
                        infirmary, had it not been for the forest of Gothic chimneys, and the colonnade of unhewn
                        firs, which implied too much of grotesqueness to indicate any purposes of utility. This
                        domain was as rigidly guarded from observation as Mr.
                            Beckford’s gorgeous halls at Fonthill. The Windsor
                        “purveyors” were very well satisfied with the change from the severe economy
                        which the Queen had exercised at the Castle since the King’s illness, to the lavish
                        housekeeping of the Cottage. Scandalous stories, such as a modern Brantôme might have recorded had he dared, were current in
                        our town. But there was ever mixed up with them some anecdotes of the Regent’s
                        kindness to his satellites and servants, amongst his frivolities and practical jokes—the
                        sort of benevolence which the most selfish
 humble neighbours by unceasing acts of kindness, and
                        by a friendliness which took an interest even in the domestic circumstances of those around
                        them—were then dispersed. The great household of the Castle was broken up. The walk to
                        Datchet through the Upper Park was closed; and we sighed in vain for some sturdy patriot to
                        resist the innovation, after the fashion of “Timothy Bennet, of
                        Hampton Wick, in Middlesex, Shoemaker,” under whose engraved portrait, preserved in a
                        few houses, was thus inscribed: “This true Briton (unwilling to leave the world
                            worse than he found it), by a vigorous application of the laws of his country, obtained
                            a free passage through Bushy Park, which had many years been withheld from the
                            people.” The Regent had been gradually
                        patching up his Cottage in the Great Park, till his enormous thatched Palace might have
                        suggested the notion that it was an immense tithe-barn converted into a workhouse or
                        infirmary, had it not been for the forest of Gothic chimneys, and the colonnade of unhewn
                        firs, which implied too much of grotesqueness to indicate any purposes of utility. This
                        domain was as rigidly guarded from observation as Mr.
                            Beckford’s gorgeous halls at Fonthill. The Windsor
                        “purveyors” were very well satisfied with the change from the severe economy
                        which the Queen had exercised at the Castle since the King’s illness, to the lavish
                        housekeeping of the Cottage. Scandalous stories, such as a modern Brantôme might have recorded had he dared, were current in
                        our town. But there was ever mixed up with them some anecdotes of the Regent’s
                        kindness to his satellites and servants, amongst his frivolities and practical jokes—the
                        sort of benevolence which the most selfish ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 223 | 
![]() show to those whom they
                        consider as a part of themselves. I used to think it not an unamiable trait of a
                        considerate host, when the court-butcher told me, “Old Bags
                            has unexpectedly come down, and a special messenger has gone back to the Cottage as
                            hard as he could gallop, with calves’ liver, which the old boy relishes better
                            than all the cookery of my friend the Shef, as they call
                            him.”
 show to those whom they
                        consider as a part of themselves. I used to think it not an unamiable trait of a
                        considerate host, when the court-butcher told me, “Old Bags
                            has unexpectedly come down, and a special messenger has gone back to the Cottage as
                            hard as he could gallop, with calves’ liver, which the old boy relishes better
                            than all the cookery of my friend the Shef, as they call
                            him.” 
    
     The Court had ceased to have any moral influence at Windsor. We had become
                        as most other country towns. Groping their way in the labyrinth of social evils by which
                        they were surrounded, most benevolent persons had come to the conclusion, that the Adults
                        of their generation must take their chance of growing happier and better under our existing
                        systems, but that improvements, to be real and permanent, must begin with the Young. The
                        half-whispered cry was for Education. A good deal had been done since the introduction of
                        the systems of Lancaster and Bell; but a great deal remained to be done. In Windsor we
                        had no schools beyond those of the Endowed Charities and a Sunday School. In 1819 there was
                        residing amongst us a gentleman of whom I shall have more particularly to speak—Mr. Edward Hawke Locker. He originated a well-considered
                        plan for the establishment of a National School, which by the Christmas of that year was
                        placed upon a solid foundation. The supporters of this institution had some prejudices to
                        struggle against, and more indifference. The political aspects of the time not only
                        diverted public attention from the social, but produced in many unreasoning persons a
                        solemn conviction that the dozen years of reading and writing that had been imprudently
                        bestowed upon a portion of ![]()
| 224 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() the manufacturing classes had made them
                        discontented and seditious; whilst the agricultural labourers, upon whom only a few unwise
                        friends of the poor had thought it necessary to shower such dangerous gifts, were as
                        patient as the ox who knoweth his owner, and the ass his master s crib. Let me glance at
                        these political aspects, which few could regard without serious fears of an unhappy future.
 the manufacturing classes had made them
                        discontented and seditious; whilst the agricultural labourers, upon whom only a few unwise
                        friends of the poor had thought it necessary to shower such dangerous gifts, were as
                        patient as the ox who knoweth his owner, and the ass his master s crib. Let me glance at
                        these political aspects, which few could regard without serious fears of an unhappy future. 
    
     The demand for Parliamentary Reform, which the terror of the French
                        Revolution had hushed for thirty years, occasionally now raised a feeble voice in a few
                        legally constituted assemblies. Scouted by majorities of Lords and Commons, a handful of
                        the old aristocratic denouncers of Rotten Boroughs still claimed for the people the right
                        of efficient Representation. Bolder advocates rose up amongst the unrepresented classes
                        themselves, who were taught by itinerant demagogues that every misery of the working man
                        would vanish at the magical word of Universal Suffrage. In the autumn of 1819, these
                        dangerous leaders persuaded their adherents that the time for action had arrived. Large
                        multitudes assembled for the election of Legislatorial Attorneys. 
    
     There were riots and arrests; and at length came what is called “The
                        Manchester Massacre.” The country was thoroughly frightened. Parliament was called
                        together to make new laws; and it produced what Lord
                            Campbell describes as “the unconstitutional code called the Six
                            Acts.” At the Christmas of 1819 every journalist went about his work under
                        the apprehension that if he wrote what, by the uncertain verdict of a jury, might be
                        construed into a seditious libel, he would not only be subjected to ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 225 | 
![]() very terrible fine and imprisonment, but, if convicted a second time, would be liable to be
                        transported beyond seas. I looked with dread towards a struggle which would end either in
                        anarchy or military government. Like Sydney Smith, I
                        regarded democracy and despotism as equally dangerous results of a contest between power
                        and mob violence. “In which of these two evils it terminates is of no more
                            consequence than from which tube of a double-barrelled pistol I meet my
                            destruction.”
                        very terrible fine and imprisonment, but, if convicted a second time, would be liable to be
                        transported beyond seas. I looked with dread towards a struggle which would end either in
                        anarchy or military government. Like Sydney Smith, I
                        regarded democracy and despotism as equally dangerous results of a contest between power
                        and mob violence. “In which of these two evils it terminates is of no more
                            consequence than from which tube of a double-barrelled pistol I meet my
                            destruction.” 
    
     The effect of these circumstances upon my political opinions, during several
                        succeeding years, is not altogether satisfactory to look back upon. In my hatred and
                        contempt of the demagogues and profligate writers who were stirring up the ignorant masses
                        to revolt and irreligion, I turned somewhat aside from regarding the injustice that was at
                        the root of a desire for change. I panted for improvement as ardently as ever. I was
                        aspiring to become a Popular Educator. But I felt that one must be content for a while to
                        shut one’s eyes to the necessity for some salutary reforms, in the dread that any
                        decided movement towards innovation would be to aid in the work of lopping and topping the
                        sturdy oak of the constitution till its shelter and its beauty were altogether gone. I
                        believe this was a common feeling not only with public writers who did not address the
                        passions of the multitude, but with statesmen who were not subservient partizans. Thence
                        ensued a reticence in writing and in speaking, which looked like a distrust of the progress
                        of improvement even with many of decided liberal opinions. I think this was amongst the
                        worst results of those evil days in which we had fallen in the last months of the ![]()
| 226 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() reign of the old King. I had to drag this chain of doubtful timidity
                        in my first attempt to address the humbler classes.
 reign of the old King. I had to drag this chain of doubtful timidity
                        in my first attempt to address the humbler classes. 
    
     As early as 1814 I had the notion of becoming a Popular Educator. I have a
                        letter before me, written on the 24th of January of that year to the more than friend to whom I laid open all my feelings and
                        plans, in which I said—“I want to consult you about a cheap work we think of
                            publishing in weekly numbers, for the use of the industrious part of the community, who
                            have neither money to buy, nor leisure to read, bulky and expensive books. It will
                            consist of plain Essays on points of duty; the Evidences of Christianity; Selections
                            from the works of the most approved English Divines; Abstracts of the Laws and
                            Constitution of Great Britain; History; Information on useful Arts and Sciences; and
                            Select Pieces of Entertainment.” The scheme was constantly in my mind; and it
                        was often present in day-dreams of a more extended area of employment than I then occupied,
                        especially after I had acquired a little familiarity with the general ignorance of the
                        working classes, knew something practical of their habits, saw in some few a desire for
                        knowledge, and felt how ill their intellectual wants could be supplied. Now and then, on
                        our market-day, in strange juxtaposition with the brown earthenware and the coarse brushes
                        of the itinerant dealers, would be placed upon a stall the old dog’s-eared volume,
                        and the new flimsy numbers of the book-hawker. I have seen with pity some aspiring artisan
                        spend his sixpence upon an antiquated manual of history or geography, to which he would
                        devote his brief and hard-earned hours of leisure, gaining thus the “two grains of
                                ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 227 | 
![]() wheat hid in two bushels of chaff.” Or I have beheld
                        some careful matron tempted to buy the first number of the “Pilgrim’s Progress” or the “Book of Martyrs”—perhaps one less
                        discreet bestowing her attention upon the “History of
                            Witchcraft” or the “Lives of the Highwaymen”—each arranging with the Canvasser for a monthly
                        delivery till the works should be completed, when they would find themselves in possession
                        of the dearest books that came from the press, even in the palmy days of expensive
                        luxuries. For the young, such stalls would offer the worst sort of temptations in sixpenny
                        Novels with a coloured frontispiece; whose very titles would invite to a familiarity with
                        the details of crime—of murders and adulteries, of violence and fraud, of licentiousness
                        revelling in London, and innocence betrayed in the country—something much more harmful than
                        the old-world stories, the dreams and divinations, of the ancient chap-books. Would the
                        book-hawker of that time, with his costly, meagre, useless, and worse than useless, wares,
                        be able to satisfy the intellectual cravings of any young man sincerely desirous profitably
                        to exercise his newly-acquired ability to read?
 wheat hid in two bushels of chaff.” Or I have beheld
                        some careful matron tempted to buy the first number of the “Pilgrim’s Progress” or the “Book of Martyrs”—perhaps one less
                        discreet bestowing her attention upon the “History of
                            Witchcraft” or the “Lives of the Highwaymen”—each arranging with the Canvasser for a monthly
                        delivery till the works should be completed, when they would find themselves in possession
                        of the dearest books that came from the press, even in the palmy days of expensive
                        luxuries. For the young, such stalls would offer the worst sort of temptations in sixpenny
                        Novels with a coloured frontispiece; whose very titles would invite to a familiarity with
                        the details of crime—of murders and adulteries, of violence and fraud, of licentiousness
                        revelling in London, and innocence betrayed in the country—something much more harmful than
                        the old-world stories, the dreams and divinations, of the ancient chap-books. Would the
                        book-hawker of that time, with his costly, meagre, useless, and worse than useless, wares,
                        be able to satisfy the intellectual cravings of any young man sincerely desirous profitably
                        to exercise his newly-acquired ability to read? 
    
     I shall have to relate, in the next chapter, how, nearly six years after the
                        idea of a Cheap Miscellany had been gradually shaping itself in my habitual thoughts, but
                        still without any notion of an immediate practical result, I suddenly made my first
                        excursion into the almost untrodden field of cheap and wholesome Literature for the People.
                        The necessity for some educational efforts to counteract the influence of dangerous
                        teachers had become more and more apparent. The Government was watchful. It had ![]()
| 228 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() the power of repressing tumult by the military arm, and of suspending
                        the public liberty for the discovery of conspirators. But it did nothing, and encouraged
                        nothing, that indicated a paternal Government. There were crafty men in most towns, who
                        stimulated discontent into outrage, and for a sufficient motive would betray their
                        associates. Such a man was living at Eton. Upon the trial of the wretched participators in
                        the Cato-Street Conspiracy, Arthur Thistlewood
                        denounced this man, as “the contriver, the instigator, the entrapper.”
                        We are told, from unquestionable authority, in the “Life of Lord Sidmouth,” that the principal
                        informant of the Home-Office “was a modeller and itinerant vendor of images, named
                                Edwards, who first opened himself at
                            Windsor, as early as the month of November, to Sir Herbert
                                Taylor, then occupying an important official situation in the
                            establishment of George III.” This Edwards
                        was not an itinerant vendor of images. I have spoken with him in his
                        small shop in the High Street of Eton—perhaps at the very time when he was plotting and
                        betraying. He had some ingenuity as a modeller; and produced a very tolerable statuette of
                            Dr. Keate, in his cocked hat. His sale of this
                        little model was considerable amongst the junior boys of Eton College—not exactly out of
                        reverence for their head-master but as a mark to be pelted at. Does any copy exist of this
                        historical Portrait? The subject of the little bust and its modeller are both historical
                        They each belong to a state of society of which we have, happily, got rid. The
                        schoolmaster, albeit a ripe scholar and a gentleman, belonged to the past times, when
                        Education, like Government, was conducted upon that system of terror which was the
 the power of repressing tumult by the military arm, and of suspending
                        the public liberty for the discovery of conspirators. But it did nothing, and encouraged
                        nothing, that indicated a paternal Government. There were crafty men in most towns, who
                        stimulated discontent into outrage, and for a sufficient motive would betray their
                        associates. Such a man was living at Eton. Upon the trial of the wretched participators in
                        the Cato-Street Conspiracy, Arthur Thistlewood
                        denounced this man, as “the contriver, the instigator, the entrapper.”
                        We are told, from unquestionable authority, in the “Life of Lord Sidmouth,” that the principal
                        informant of the Home-Office “was a modeller and itinerant vendor of images, named
                                Edwards, who first opened himself at
                            Windsor, as early as the month of November, to Sir Herbert
                                Taylor, then occupying an important official situation in the
                            establishment of George III.” This Edwards
                        was not an itinerant vendor of images. I have spoken with him in his
                        small shop in the High Street of Eton—perhaps at the very time when he was plotting and
                        betraying. He had some ingenuity as a modeller; and produced a very tolerable statuette of
                            Dr. Keate, in his cocked hat. His sale of this
                        little model was considerable amongst the junior boys of Eton College—not exactly out of
                        reverence for their head-master but as a mark to be pelted at. Does any copy exist of this
                        historical Portrait? The subject of the little bust and its modeller are both historical
                        They each belong to a state of society of which we have, happily, got rid. The
                        schoolmaster, albeit a ripe scholar and a gentleman, belonged to the past times, when
                        Education, like Government, was conducted upon that system of terror which was the ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 229 | 
![]() easiest system for the administrators. “The greatest
                            happiness for the greatest number,” whether of boys or men, had to be
                        discovered. In the scholastic, or political, exaltation of the aristocratic system, there
                        was ample scope for the few clever and aspiring. To these the patrician and the pedagogue
                        graciously afforded encouragement and substantial patronage. But the mass of the dull, the
                        unambitious, and the reckless, were left to their own capacity for drifting into evil. If
                        the misdoers came under the imperfect cognizance of the authorities, they were heavily
                        punished as a salutary terror to others. The flogging-block was the first step to personal
                        degradation in the school; the prison, in the State. If these did not answer, the school
                        was ready with expulsion; the State with the gallows. One essential difference there was in
                        the two systems. The honour of the Etonian was proof against spydom and treachery as
                        regarded his fellows. In the terror-stricken politics of that time there was verge enough
                        for the instigator and entrapper. I have written that Sir Herbert
                            Taylor, whose honour was unimpeachable, was utterly incapable of suggesting
                        to the spy that he should incite the wretched associates in the conspiracy to the pursuance
                        of their frantic designs. (“Popular History of
                            England,” vol. viii. p. 160.) Yet, if I remember rightly the face of
                            George Edwards, Sir Herbert Taylor might have
                        seen that he was a rogue by nature. This diminutive animal, with downcast look and stealthy
                        face, did not calculate badly when he approached one who, although bred in court-habits,
                        had a solid foundation of honesty which made him unsuspicious. Sir
                            Herbert was a man not versed in the common affairs of the outer world.
 easiest system for the administrators. “The greatest
                            happiness for the greatest number,” whether of boys or men, had to be
                        discovered. In the scholastic, or political, exaltation of the aristocratic system, there
                        was ample scope for the few clever and aspiring. To these the patrician and the pedagogue
                        graciously afforded encouragement and substantial patronage. But the mass of the dull, the
                        unambitious, and the reckless, were left to their own capacity for drifting into evil. If
                        the misdoers came under the imperfect cognizance of the authorities, they were heavily
                        punished as a salutary terror to others. The flogging-block was the first step to personal
                        degradation in the school; the prison, in the State. If these did not answer, the school
                        was ready with expulsion; the State with the gallows. One essential difference there was in
                        the two systems. The honour of the Etonian was proof against spydom and treachery as
                        regarded his fellows. In the terror-stricken politics of that time there was verge enough
                        for the instigator and entrapper. I have written that Sir Herbert
                            Taylor, whose honour was unimpeachable, was utterly incapable of suggesting
                        to the spy that he should incite the wretched associates in the conspiracy to the pursuance
                        of their frantic designs. (“Popular History of
                            England,” vol. viii. p. 160.) Yet, if I remember rightly the face of
                            George Edwards, Sir Herbert Taylor might have
                        seen that he was a rogue by nature. This diminutive animal, with downcast look and stealthy
                        face, did not calculate badly when he approached one who, although bred in court-habits,
                        had a solid foundation of honesty which made him unsuspicious. Sir
                            Herbert was a man not versed in the common affairs of the outer world. ![]()
| 230 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() He had been the depository of many a political secret which he could
                        confide to no friend. Shy, painfully cautious, I have heard him break down in the most
                        simple address to the electors when he first stood for Windsor; and yet a man of real
                        ability. Imagine a crafty mechanic procuring access to him at the Castle as the starving
                        man of taste—a plaster cast of his workmanship carefully produced—the guinea about to be
                        proffered—and then a whisper of some terrible Secret which he could disclose at the peril
                        of his life—all the outer evidences of contrition, and the resolve to make a clean breast.
                        Imagine this repeated day by day—with the plot-haunted Lord
                            Sidmouth eagerly calling for more evidence, and urging Sir Herbert
                            Taylor to palter with this devil, and not hand him over to the Privy
                        Council, who might have crushed the cockatrice before the egg was hatched. We may imagine
                        all this; and yet acquit Sir Herbert Taylor of a participation in the
                        guilt which too often attaches to those, in all ages, who have fostered treason in waiting
                        for overt acts.
 He had been the depository of many a political secret which he could
                        confide to no friend. Shy, painfully cautious, I have heard him break down in the most
                        simple address to the electors when he first stood for Windsor; and yet a man of real
                        ability. Imagine a crafty mechanic procuring access to him at the Castle as the starving
                        man of taste—a plaster cast of his workmanship carefully produced—the guinea about to be
                        proffered—and then a whisper of some terrible Secret which he could disclose at the peril
                        of his life—all the outer evidences of contrition, and the resolve to make a clean breast.
                        Imagine this repeated day by day—with the plot-haunted Lord
                            Sidmouth eagerly calling for more evidence, and urging Sir Herbert
                            Taylor to palter with this devil, and not hand him over to the Privy
                        Council, who might have crushed the cockatrice before the egg was hatched. We may imagine
                        all this; and yet acquit Sir Herbert Taylor of a participation in the
                        guilt which too often attaches to those, in all ages, who have fostered treason in waiting
                        for overt acts. 
    
     Before the outbreak of the Conspiracy, an event occurred, which, although
                        not unexpected, nor fraught with consequences unforeseen, opened a further certain prospect
                        of political disquiet. The death of George the Third
                        took place on the evening of Saturday, the 29th of January, 1820. The Duke of Kent, his fourth son, had died only six days before.
                        The Regent became King; the Duke of York was the
                        Presumptive Heir to the Throne; the Duke of Clarence
                        the next in succession. The infant daughter of the Duke of Kent would
                        succeed, if the three elder brothers of her father should die without issue. The position
                        of George the Fourth and Queen Caro-![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 231 | 
![]() line might again open that miserable
                        “Book” which the public welfare required to be for ever shut.
line might again open that miserable
                        “Book” which the public welfare required to be for ever shut. 
    
     The Funeral of George the Third appeared
                        to me like the close of a long series of reminiscences. Windsor had to me been associated
                        with the loud talk and the good-natured laugh of a portly gentleman with a star on his
                        breast, whom I sometimes ran against in my childhood; with a venerable personage, blind,
                        but cheerful, who sat erect on a led horse, as I had seen him in my youth; with the dim
                        idea of my manhood, that in rooms of the Castle which no curiosity could penetrate, there
                        sat an old man with a long beard, bereft of every attribute of rank, who occasionally
                        talked wildly or threw himself about frantically, and sometimes awoke recollections of
                        happier days by striking a few chords on his piano. Then came the final pageant. It was a
                        Poem rather than a show. The Lying-in-State was something higher than undertaker’s
                        art. As I passed through St. George’s Hall, I thought of the last display of regal
                        pomp in that room—the Installation of 1805—when at the banquet the Sovereign stood up and
                        pledged his knights, and the knights, in full cups of gold, invoked health and happiness on
                        the Sovereign. The throne on which George the Third then sat was now
                        covered with funeral draperies. I went on into the King’s Guard-Chamber. The room was
                        darkened—there was no light but that of the flickering wood-fires which burnt on an ancient
                        hearth on each side. On the ground lay the beds on which the Yeomen of the Guard had slept
                        during the night. They stood in their grand old dresses of state, with broad scarves of
                        crape across their breasts, and crape on their halberds. As the red light of the burning
                        brands ![]()
| 232 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. | 
![]() gleamed on their rough faces, and glanced ever and anon upon
                        the polished mail of the Black Prince, on the
                        bruised armour of the soldiers of the Plantagenets, and on the matchlocks and bandoleers of
                        the early days of modern warfare, some of the reality of the Present passed into visions of
                        the Past. I thought of Edward of Windsor, the great
                        builder of the Castle, deserted in his last moments. I thought of other “sad
                            stories of the deaths of kings.” I came back to the immediate interest of the
                        scene before me, by remembering that not one of the long line of English sovereigns before
                            George the Third had died at Windsor. I passed on into the chamber
                        of death. All here was comparatively modern. The hangings of purple cloth which hid
                            West’s gaudy pictures of the Institution of
                        the Order of the Garter; the wax-lights on silver sconces; the pages standing by the side
                        of the coffin; the Lord of the Bedchamber sitting at its head; much of this was upholstery
                        work, and did not affect the imagination, except in connexion with the solemn silence,—a
                        stillness unbroken, even when rustic feet, unused to tread on carpets, passed by the bier,
                        awe-struck.
 gleamed on their rough faces, and glanced ever and anon upon
                        the polished mail of the Black Prince, on the
                        bruised armour of the soldiers of the Plantagenets, and on the matchlocks and bandoleers of
                        the early days of modern warfare, some of the reality of the Present passed into visions of
                        the Past. I thought of Edward of Windsor, the great
                        builder of the Castle, deserted in his last moments. I thought of other “sad
                            stories of the deaths of kings.” I came back to the immediate interest of the
                        scene before me, by remembering that not one of the long line of English sovereigns before
                            George the Third had died at Windsor. I passed on into the chamber
                        of death. All here was comparatively modern. The hangings of purple cloth which hid
                            West’s gaudy pictures of the Institution of
                        the Order of the Garter; the wax-lights on silver sconces; the pages standing by the side
                        of the coffin; the Lord of the Bedchamber sitting at its head; much of this was upholstery
                        work, and did not affect the imagination, except in connexion with the solemn silence,—a
                        stillness unbroken, even when rustic feet, unused to tread on carpets, passed by the bier,
                        awe-struck. 
    
     One such Royal Funeral as I had previously seen was not essentially
                        different from another. The outdoor ceremonial at the interment of George the Third was not readily to be forgotten. It was a walking
                        procession. The night was dark and misty. Vast crowds were assembled in the Lower Ward of
                        the Castle, hushed and expectant. A platform had been erected from the Grand Entrance of
                        the Castle to the Western Entrance of St. George’s Chapel. It was lined on each side
                        by a single file of the Guards. A signal-rocket is fired. Every soldier lights a torch, ![]()
| Ch. V.] | THE FIRST EPOCH. | 233 | 
![]() and the massive towers and the delicate pinnacles stand out in the red
                        glare. Minute guns are now heard in the distance. Will those startling voices never cease?
                        Expectation is at its height. A flourish of trumpets is heard, and then the roll of muffled
                        drums. A solemn dirge comes upon the ear, nearer and nearer. The funeral-car glides slowly
                        along the platform without any perceptible aid from human or mechanical power. The dirge
                        ceases for a little while; and then again the trumpets and the muffled drums sound
                        alternately. Again the dirge—softly breathing flutes and clarionets mingling their notes
                        with “the mellow horn”—and then a dead silence; for the final
                        resting-place is reached. Heralds and banners and escutcheons touch not the heart. But the
                        Music! That is something grander than the picturesque.
 and the massive towers and the delicate pinnacles stand out in the red
                        glare. Minute guns are now heard in the distance. Will those startling voices never cease?
                        Expectation is at its height. A flourish of trumpets is heard, and then the roll of muffled
                        drums. A solemn dirge comes upon the ear, nearer and nearer. The funeral-car glides slowly
                        along the platform without any perceptible aid from human or mechanical power. The dirge
                        ceases for a little while; and then again the trumpets and the muffled drums sound
                        alternately. Again the dirge—softly breathing flutes and clarionets mingling their notes
                        with “the mellow horn”—and then a dead silence; for the final
                        resting-place is reached. Heralds and banners and escutcheons touch not the heart. But the
                        Music! That is something grander than the picturesque. 
    
    
    
    Robert Battiscombe  (1754 c.-1839)  
                  Apothecary at Windsor; the royal family were among his patients.
               
 
    William Thomas Beckford  (1760-1844)  
                  English novelist and aesthete, son of the Jamaica planter and Lord Mayor William Beckford
                        (1709-1770), author of 
Vathek: An Arabian Tale, surreptitiously
                        translated and published in 1786. He was MP for Wells (1784-90) and Hindon (1790-94,
                        1806-20).
               
 
    Andrew Bell  (1753-1832)  
                  Scottish Episcopalian educated at St. Andrews University; he was the founder of the
                        “Madras” system of education by mutual instruction; Robert Southey was his
                        biographer.
               
 
    Jeremy Bentham  (1748-1832)  
                  The founder of Utilitarianism; author of 
Principles of Morals and
                            Legislation (1789).
               
 
    
    Charles William Shirley Brooks  (1816-1880)  
                  The son of the architect William Brooks, he was a journalist and playwright who
                        contributed to 
Punch and 
Ainsworth's
                        Magazine.
               
 
    William Brooks  (1786-1867)  
                  English architect and social reformer who designed the London Institution; he was the
                        father of Shirley Brooks of 
Punch.
               
 
    Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux  (1778-1868)  
                  Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the 
Edinburgh
                            Review in which he chastised Byron's 
Hours of Idleness; he
                        defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
                        (1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
               
 
    
    John Campbell, first baron Campbell  (1779-1861)  
                  Barrister and biographer; he was a liberal MP for Stafford (1830-32), Dudley (1832-34),
                        and Edinburgh (1834-41); created Baron Campbell (1841), lord chancellor (1859).
               
 
    Queen Caroline of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel  (1768-1821)  
                  Married the Prince of Wales in 1795 and separated in 1796; her husband instituted
                        unsuccessful divorce proceedings in 1820 when she refused to surrender her rights as
                        queen.
               
 
    
    Samuel Taylor Coleridge  (1772-1834)  
                  English poet and philosopher who projected 
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
                        with William Wordsworth; author of 
Biographia Literaria (1817), 
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
                        works.
               
 
    William Collins  (1721-1759)  
                  English poet, author of 
Persian Eclogues (1742), 
Odes on Several Descriptive and Allegorical Subjects (1746), and 
Ode on the Popular Superstitions of the Highlands (1788).
               
 
    Elizabeth Cooper  [née Price]   (1698 c.-1761 c.)  
                  English playwright, actress, and bookseller who with the assistance of William Oldys
                        produced an important anthology of early English poetry, 
The Muses
                            Library (1737).
               
 
    Sir William Curtis, first baronet  (1752-1829)  
                  A banker and friend of George IV; he was Lord Mayor of London (1795) and as Tory MP for
                        London (1790-1818) was a target of Whig mockery.
               
 
    Michael Drayton  (1563-1631)  
                  English poet, the imitator of Spenser and friend of Ben Jonson; he published 
Poly-Olbion (1612).
               
 
    Maria Edgeworth  (1768-1849)  
                  Irish novelist; author of 
Castle Rackrent (1800) 
Belinda (1801), 
The Absentee (1812) and 
Ormond (1817).
               
 
    
    
    Edward Augustus, duke of Kent  (1767-1820)  
                  The fourth son of George III, who pursued a military career and acquired a reputation as
                        a martinet; he was governor of Gibraltar (1802-03).
               
 
    George Edwards  (1787 c.-1843)  
                  English sculptor at Eton and London; he was the government spy who betrayed Arthur
                        Thistlewood and broke up the Cato Street Conspiracy.
               
 
    
    Edward Fairfax  (1568 c.-1635 c.)  
                  In 1600 he translated Tasso as 
Godfrey of Bulloigne.
               
 
    Frederick Augustus, Duke of York  (1763-1827)  
                  He was commander-in-chief of the Army, 1798-1809, until his removal on account of the
                        scandal involving his mistress Mary Anne Clarke.
               
 
    
    
    Franz Joseph Haydn  (1732-1809)  
                  German composer; his popular oratorio 
The Seasons set texts by the
                        poet James Thomson.
               
 
    George Herbert  (1593-1633)  
                  English clergyman and devotional poet; his poetry was posthumously published as 
The Temple in 1633.
               
 
    Robert Herrick  (1591-1674)  
                  Cavalier lyric poet and epigrammaticist, the author of 
Hesperides
                        (1648).
               
 
    John Hoole  (1727-1803)  
                  English translator, playwright, and friend of Dr. Johnson; he published 
Jerusalem Delivered (1763), an often-reprinted translation reviled by the
                        romantics.
               
 
    Samuel Johnson  (1709-1784)  
                  English man of letters, among many other works he edited 
A Dictionary
                            of the English Language (1755) and Shakespeare (1765), and wrote 
Lives of the Poets (1779-81).
               
 
    Edmund Kean  (1787-1833)  
                  English tragic actor famous for his Shakespearean roles.
               
 
    John Keate  (1773-1852)  
                  Headmaster at Eton College (1809-1834) and canon of Windsor; he had a reputation as a
                        flogger.
               
 
    John Keats  (1795-1821)  
                  English poet, author of 
Endymion, "The Eve of St. Agnes," and
                        other poems, who died of tuberculosis in Rome.
               
 
    Joseph Lancaster  (1778-1838)  
                  Founder of the Lancastrian system of education; he published 
Improvements in Education (1803).
               
 
    
    Edward Hawke Locker  (1777-1849)  
                  Secretary to the Royal Naval Hospital, Greenwich (1819); he was a painter, editor of 
The Plain Englishman (1820-30) and a friend of Robert Southey and
                        Sir Walter Scott.
               
 
    Francis Charles Parry  (1780-1878)  
                  Educated at Winchester, University College, Oxford, and the Middle Temple, he was
                        commissioner of bankrupts (1810-31) and a contributor to the 
Edinburgh
                            Review.
               
 
    Plotinus  (204 c.-270)  
                  The author of 
Enneads and founder of the neoplatonic school of
                        philosophy.
               
 
    Alexander Pope  (1688-1744)  
                  English poet and satirist; author of 
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
                        and 
The Dunciad (1728).
               
 
    Jane Porter  (1776-1850)  
                  English novelist, sister of the poet and novelist Anna Maria Porter (1778-1832); she
                        wrote 
The Scottish Chiefs (1810).
               
 
    Proclus  (412-485)  
                  Neoplatonic philosopher who wrote a commentary on Plato's 
Timaeus.
               
 
    
    Sir Samuel Romilly  (1757-1818)  
                  Reformer of the penal code and the author of 
Thoughts on Executive
                            Justice (1786); he was a Whig MP and Solicitor-General who died a suicide.
               
 
    
    
    Samuel Weller Singer  (1783-1858)  
                  English antiquary and bookseller; he wrote biographies of English poets for the 
Chiswick British Poets, edited 
Spence's
                            Anecdotes (1820) in a rival edition to Murray's, and contributed to the 
Literary Gazette.
               
 
    Sydney Smith  (1771-1845)  
                  Clergyman, wit, and one of the original projectors of the 
Edinburgh
                            Review; afterwards lecturer in London and one of the Holland House
                        denizens.
               
 
    Robert Stephenson  (1803-1859)  
                  English civil engineer who studied at Edinburgh University and designed railroads and
                        bridges.
               
 
    George Steevens  (1736-1800)  
                  English antiquary, malicious wit, and editor of a standard edition of Shakespeare's 
Works (1773, etc).
               
 
    Torquato Tasso  (1554-1595)  
                  Italian poet, author of 
Aminta (1573), a pastoral drama, and 
Jerusalem Delivered (1580).
               
 
    Sir Herbert Taylor  (1775-1839)  
                  He was aide-de-camp and private secretary to the duke of York, afterwards to George III
                        and William IV; he was MP for Windsor (1820-23) and published 
Memoirs of
                            the Last Illness and Decease of HRH the Duke of York (1827).
               
 
    Thomas Taylor [the Platonist]   (1758-1835)  
                  Bank-clerk and dissenter whose lectures on Platonic philosophy at the house of the
                        sculptor John Flaxman gained him the title of “the Platonist.” He spent his later years as
                        a professional translator.
               
 
    Arthur Thistlewood  (1774-1820)  
                  English radical and disciple of Thomas Spence; he was hanged after the exposure of an
                        assassination plot against the British cabinet.
               
 
    William Upcott  (1779-1845)  
                  English bookseller, collector, and librarian at the London Institution (1806-34). He
                        wrote for the 
Literary Gazette.
               
 
    Benjamin West  (1738-1820)  
                  American-born historical painter who traveled to Europe in 1760 and was one of the
                        founders of the Royal Academy in London.
               
 
    
    George Wither  (1588-1667)  
                  Prolific Puritan poet and satirist who became a byword for bad poetry; during the
                        eighteenth century his more attractive youthful verse began to be reprinted and
                        admired.
               
 
    William Wordsworth  (1770-1850)  
                  With Coleridge, author of 
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
                        survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.