Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter V
CHAPTER V.
AT York, I accomplished very little of the work upon which I was
intent. The commercial atmosphere was better adapted for the diffusion of secular knowledge
than the ecclesiastical. I had received a hint from headquarters to be cautious in my
movements—“to be careful not to frighten people by the appearance of great
ramifications of the Society, and so fill their heads with horrors of Corresponding
Societies, Carbonari, Tugendbund, Jesuits, and other frightful images.” So I
had two days of rest and enjoyment. I saw the glorious Minster only a year before the
middle aisle of the choir was destroyed by fire. I heard the grand old organ, which was
destroyed in the same conflagration of 1829. I could climb upon the city walls, but I could
not walk far upon them, for they were then in a ruinous state. I had a most interesting
visit to “the Retreat”—that one Lunatic Asylum in the whole kingdom where the
most grievous of maladies was not rendered hopeless of cure by stripes and the dark cell.
The Society of Friends, in this their noble experiment, gave an impulse to the labours of
such true philanthropists as Dr. Conolly, the kind
and enlightened physician who was working as one of our Committee in 1828. The Retreat at
York was visited by me at the period when Parliament was discussing the details of a Bill
94 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
for the Care and Treatment of Insane Persons, which became law in
that Session.
I proceed on my journey, turning my face southward, and halt a little at
Sheffield. My principal letter of introduction is to Mr. J. H.
Abraham. This gentleman, seven years before my visit to him, had sent to the
Society of Arts a model of a mouth-guard, to be used by dry-grinders and needle-pointers.
The dry-grinders of Sheffield were constantly under the view of Mr.
Abraham. He saw hundreds suffering from the “grinders’
asthma,” which invariably attacked those who had been regularly employed at this work
when they had reached their twenty-fifth or twenty-seventh year, and entailed upon them a
miserable existence for a very few years longer. The most ample testimony was given that
the invention was completely successful. The mouth-piece effectively arrested the particles
that, without it, produced this constant suffering and premature decay. Mr.
Abraham sought no reward for his ingenuity but the pleasure of doing good.
One and all, dry-grinders and needle-pointers, refused to adopt the invention. They
believed that their high wages would be lowered, if the work were rendered less injurious.
I saw the kind-hearted inventor, depressed by the disappointment of his desire to benefit
his fellow-creatures. He probably took a gloomy view of the possibility of lifting his
humbler townsmen out of the depths of their ignorance. He formed even a less sanguine
estimate of the zeal of the more influential in attempts to dispel this darkness, when he
said to me, “I fear this is a hopeless task in which you are engaged. You will
have all sorts of prejudices to overcome. There is a general appre-
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 95 |
hension here of the education of the people. You will form no Committee here, but you
may have my name to do what you please with. There is a general feeling that you have
dark objects in view—that a desire to overthrow Church and State is at the
bottom.” I went my way; though I could scarcely believe that there would be a
want of enlightenment amongst the wealthier classes in the town of James Montgomery, Samuel
Bailey, and Ebenezer Elliott. Nor
could I indulge such a dreary belief of the dogged ignorance of Sheffield workmen as this
rejection of the means of health and life by the dry-grinders suggested, when I recollected
that not a year had passed since I had learnt much in the society of a self-taught
engineer, who was once a humble workman in Sheffield. In the Inaugural Lecture of the
Sheffield Athenæum, which I delivered in 1847, I thus described this valued friend, who
died in 1827: “for a few years I enjoyed the conversation of a very extraordinary
man—rich in all scientific knowledge—inquiring in all subjects of mental
philosophy—honoured, not by high titles but by universal respect—who once worked at the
forge in this very town. That man—always full of the most ingenious mechanical
contrivances, which he more particularly applied, in connection with his higher
science, to the great objects of warming and ventilating our dwellings and our public
buildings—invented, when he was a workman here, little machines to facilitate his
handicraft labour, that he might have a greater share of leisure—not a higher amount of
wages, but time to spare—for the purpose of a more intense devotion to the studies
which eventually made him what he was. That 96 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
man was one of your
Hallamshire worthies—Charles
Sylvester.” And yet, at that period, Mr. Abraham
did not exaggerate the supineness of the payers of wages in the promotion of intelligence
amongst the artisan class, nor the obstinacy of that class in refusing to accept the
benefits which science offered them. Mr. M. D. Hill,
in the September of 1828, visited Scotland for the purpose of seeing what progress was
being made by our Society. From one of several interesting letters written by him during
that journey I extract the following illustration of the difficulties of dealing with old
habits and prejudices:—“In general, workmen are averse to all innovations, and
their indisposition to change their plans thwarts an enterprising employer more than
can be readily imagined. I myself had a relation who was a West Indian planter, and who
tried to ease the labour of his negroes by changing the baskets with which they removed
soil (carrying them on their heads) for wheelbarrows. The poor wretches clamoured for
their baskets, and when they found they must use the wheelbarrows, they absolutely
refused to wheel them along, but carried them on their heads. It is a great thing to
change this negative quantity of intellect for the positive power of originating
improvements. And yet such is the infatuation of some masters, that the wish to educate
the lower orders is by no means universal among the employers of labour—not even among
those who have themselves risen from the ranks.”
I had delivered my credentials at Derby; had enjoyed the hospitality of the
two eminent brothers, William and Joseph Strutt, and had arranged with them for a further
consultation. I wanted a little
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 97 |
relief from my engrossing occupation,
and I started to spend a couple of days at Matlock and Dovedale. I had the company at
Matlock of John Sylvester, the son of the remarkable
self-taught engineer, who began life as a common smith, and so improved his few hours of
leisure as to become a writer of some of the best scientific articles in “Rees’s Cyclopedia.” I
enjoyed for some years the friendship of the younger man, who succeeded his father in his
professional pursuits, and obtained as high a reputation. The scenery of Matlock has been
so often described, and has now become so well known by the agency of Railways, that I need
not here linger. Parting with my companion, I hired a light carriage, and drove through a
somewhat wild country to Dovedale. I well remember how astonished I was to witness a
funeral procession amongst those hills—a long file of mourners on horseback, men and women,
following a corpse to its last resting-place. On a bright evening of June I reached the
prettiest of inns—the “Isaak Walton”—built by Mr.
Watts Russell, the proprietor of the domain of Dovedale and the adjoining
mansion of Ilam. The left bank of the Dove was free to all such wanderers as myself; for
there the privileges of ownership did not extend. The gates on the right bank were locked.
It mattered little to me that I could not pursue my walk in that solitary place, wandering
as the river wandered “at its own sweet will.” But I was indignant at the
painted boards, meeting the eye at every turn, setting forth the legal punishment that
awaited the trespasser. A month afterwards, my feelings welled out in a remonstrance
against the purchased privileges of the rich man who had thus destroyed some of the poetry
98 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
of this exquisite scenery:—“Why have you profaned by your
hateful proclamations this vale of peace, where nature has heaped up the rocks and
crags in the most solemn forms, as if to call the heart to worship ‘in a temple
not made by hands’?—why have you profaned this glorious retreat, shut out as it
were from a world over which man has the petty mastery, to lift up the soul to the
Eternal Spirit of all created things, by exhibiting the impress of his power in the
unchangeable masses of gigantic stones, that have stood upon this river’s brink
since the hills were torn asunder by some terrific convulsion, and the sparkling stream
first rushed through the mighty chasm;—why have you profaned this monument of the grand
workings of the God of Nature, and deformed a scene amidst which man ought only to move
with reverence and peacefulness? Why this unnecessary parade of the rights of property?
Take down your boards; place them in the gardens and shrubberies of Ilam as thick as
you please, but allow us to look up the long vista of rocks and woods, and abandon our
hearts to the tranquillizing influence of this most perfect solitude, without having a
thought of the gamekeeper and the attorney; let us hear the chorus of a thousand
thrushes, pouring out the full note of harmony from the overflowings of their
happiness, without recollecting that the world is full of beings in whom the spirit of
enjoyment is dead, and who burrow their way amongst their riches, while the sun shines,
and the breeze blows, in vain for them;—let us believe, while the wild rose sends forth
its most honied perfume through every nook of this wild and solemn valley, that the
whole earth is not yet under the dominion of a false refinement, Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 99 |
and that we may flee to the mountains, and to the secluded rivers, with the intention
to commune with our own hearts, and to be still, without the voice of the proud one
scaring us from our vision of peace.”* As I strolled the next day through the
village of Mapleton, I thought of the two poetical anglers who had walked here in loving
companionship. In that ancient inn surely Cotton and
Walton had cooked a trout. Did
Cotton write those lines upon the sign of “The Gate”
which proclaim the ancient alehouse as one that had afforded entertainment to others than
Derbyshire hinds?— “This Gate hangs well, And hinders none; Refresh thyself, And travel on.” |
I take the advice, and am again in Derby.
The business of my mission had gone on smoothly during my brief absence. But
the converts had been chiefly Unitarian Dissenters, of which body the
Strutts were the acknowledged heads in Derby. I came back to their
town at an exciting time. There was to be a public dinner to celebrate the Repeal of the
Corporation and Test Acts. Lord John Russell’s
first great labour in the cause of religious liberty had become law on the 9th of May.
Lord John Russell was the Vice-Chairman of our Useful Knowledge
Society, and his name was, therefore, a ready passport for me to a cordial welcome, when I
attended as a guest at the public dinner. It was a curious spectacle. Many of those present
were Dissenting min-
100 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
isters. Some had come from remote villages nestled in the
hills—“mountains,” as Cotton calls them.
In their after-dinner oratory there was a rude strength, which indicated not only their
zeal, but their inexperience. I see now the lank form, the haggard face, of one young man,
who raved as if the days of martyrdom had only passed away during the previous fortnight,
when “the necessity of receiving the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper as a
qualification for certain offices and employments” had ceased. The youthful
enthusiast who lives in my memory moved his audience, as the “Macbriar” of Scott
moved the Solemn League and Covenant men in the days of real persecution. “The
fun”—dare I call it fun?—“grew fast and furious.” I sat by
the side of the Chairman, Mr. Higginson, the very
clever minister of Derby. He whispered to me that we had better make a move to go.
“Some of these worthy men,” he said, “are not used to
public dinners; I must keep them steady.” So he announced that Mr. William Strutt would be glad to see all the company to
tea at his house. It was a real relief to have a quiet talk in his library with this
sagacious and tolerant man—a great reader, a vigorous thinker, an encourager of all
scientific talent, as his brother was a lover, and in some respects a patron of Art. A
stroll in the beautiful gardens restored the orators of the Repeal dinner to their ordinary
habit of discoursing upon matters sacred and secular. There was no “Arboretum”
then to tempt us to wander on that summer evening in less secluded gardens. That noble
addition to the attractions of Derby was the present of Joseph
Strutt to his townsfolk. What a contrast to the spirit which partially shut
up Dove- Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 101 |
dale are the words of this descendant of Jedediah Strutt,—the partner with Arkwright in the “Derby-rib” stocking
manufacture,—spoken in 1840 at the opening of the grounds which he had dedicated to public
use. He might have said,— “I give them you, And to your heirs for ever; common pleasures, To walk abroad, and recreate yourselves.” |
But poetry was unnecessary to enhance the value of the gift; and so he took occasion
to utter words of wisdom which have not been without their use, in producing that better
spirit in which the wealthy and the great have cast off the exclusiveness of a past
generation:—“It has often been made a reproach to our country that, in
England, collections of works of art, and exhibitions for instruction and amusement,
cannot, without danger of injury, be thrown open to the public. If any ground for such
a reproach still remains, I am convinced that it can be removed only by greater
liberality in admitting the people to such establishments; by thus teaching them that
they are themselves the parties most deeply interested in their preservation, and that
it must be the interest of the public to protect that which is intended for the public
advantage. If we wish to obtain the affections of others, we must manifest kindness and
regard towards them; if we seek to wean them from debasing pursuits and brutalizing
pleasures, we can only hope to do so by opening to them new sources of rational
enjoyment.”
Nottingham had for me some matters of more immediate interest than the
gratification of antiquarian
102 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
curiosity. I looked, of course, rapidly
at the spot where Charles first opened “The purple testament of bleeding war;” |
which Colonel Hutchinson had defended, his
heroic wife ever at his side. The modern Castle was
in 1828 a fit residence for a great noble. In 1830 it was a blackened ruin,—a monument of
blind fury and popular ignorance at a season of political excitement. I wanted to learn
something of the existing condition of the working population. Luddism had been quelled.
There was no longer the terror of armed bands breaking into factories and destroying the
lace-machines, which were, perhaps, the most beautiful of inventions for superseding manual
labour. The patent of 1809, which could never be worked profitably by the inventor in the
face of the combinations of workmen and the jealousy of manufacturers, expired in 1823; and
then capitalists and mechanics became wild with the desire to possess some interest in the
wondrous money-making power which appeared to belong to the bobbin-net machines. Artisans
assisted as co-operators in the working of a lace-frame. Shareholders of all trades and
professions became speculators in the lace-manufacture. The competition for the possession
of a machine was so great that any price under a thousand pounds was considered moderate.
The mania was subsiding when I was at Nottingham. I saw this wondrous machine in an
imperfect state compared with its present capabilities; and I could easily understand how
the poor lace-makers of Buckinghamshire, whose moving bobbins I had often noticed with
admiration, Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 103 |
would be driven out by a machine which, worked by one
person, could produce many thousand meshes in a minute. But it would then have been
difficult to believe, as we learn upon the authority of Mr.
William Felkin,—a Nottingham manufacturer, whose intelligence is as
remarkable as his energetic benevolence,—that the annual returns of the machine-made
lace-trade would have reached five millions sterling in 1862. The active philanthropy of
this gentleman has been chiefly displayed in his labours to alleviate the condition of the
stockingers of the hosiery district; and it is consolatory to learn, that “the worn
and anxious countenances, by which these men during the first half of the century were
easily distinguishable, are only seen among the relics of the past generation of
stocking-makers.”* The entire system of remuneration for labour, under which these
stockingers lived, was a complicated system of slavery. They worked in their own miserable
homes at a stocking-frame, for which they paid rent weekly. That rent was a fixed charge,
levied by the manufacturer who gave out the yarn to the weaver. There were speculators in
frames, who let them out also—“independent” frames, as they were called. If the
hosiery trade were slack, those who hired the frames upon which the manufacturer obtained a
profit from the rent could obtain no work. Still less could they obtain employ if, rare
occurrence, they possessed frames of their own, like the hand-loom weavers of Yorkshire. In
addition to all this there was the ever present tyranny and extortion of a
“middleman.” No wonder that there were “worn and
* Jurors’ Reports of International
Exhibition, 1862. |
104 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
anxious countenances” at Nottingham when I visited that
fine town. No wonder that I made little progress in my task of interesting masters and
workmen in the Diffusion of Knowledge.
I was invited to Birmingham by a gentleman, whose friendship I am happy to
have retained. Mr. Joseph Parkes had been apprised
by Mr. Brougham that I was about to visit his town. He
had rendered valuable assistance to the Law Reformer in the preparation of his speech of
the 7th February, and his name was several times quoted in that speech. Mr.
Parkes had written to me, “I shall be most glad to see you at my
house for bed, board, and entertainment. I will also give you a private sitting-room in
which to concert matters, and introduce you to those disciples most likely to aid us
here.” I could not refuse such an invitation. Yet I had a most respected
friend in Thomas Wright Hill, the father of my friend
Matthew Davenport; the founder of that remarkable
innovation upon the old routine of Middle-class Schools, which was called “The
Hazelwood System.” That school near Birmingham was still conducted by the elder
Hill, although his distinguished son, Rowland, with his brothers Edwin and
Arthur, had established a school upon the same
system at Bruce Castle, Tottenham. I had seen the workings of that system once before at
Hazelwood, after I had published, in 1824, the volume on “Public Education,” which was attributed to the
elder brother, who was then practising at the bar with great success. Mr.
Parkes’s hospitable offer placed me more in the heart of the business
which I had to conduct. I need not say that my sojourn with him was agreeable; for to his
own qualities of
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 105 |
improving companionship were added those of his
amiable wife, a grand-daughter of Dr. Priestley.
Mr. Parkes was at that time, as he long continued to be, an ardent
politician. The Liberals of Birmingham were smarting under the issue of the East Retford
Disfranchisement Bill of the 21st April, in which it was proposed that the franchise should
be transferred to Birmingham, or some other large town. Sir
James Macintosh, on that debate, had said, “I have nothing to do
with the question as it respects Birmingham, except (comparing it with the section of a
county to which it is proposed to transfer the franchise) to ask, whether the
inhabitants of Birmingham, an unrepresented community, a population of one hundred and
twenty thousand, abounding with men of property, character, and intelligence; or the
comparatively small number of fifteen hundred freeholders of Nottinghamshire,—all of
whom already possess the right of voting for Members of Parliament, should be selected
as the successor of the delinquent Corporation of Retford.” The sting of the
great political mistake of the Tories remained, and Birmingham had become radical to an
extent which two years later had grown alarming. I had nothing to do with political
animosities; but it was an unpropitious time for preaching the Diffusion of Knowledge
without regard to political objects. An influential Local Association was, however, formed,
which rendered good service to our objects.
As a matter of course, I saw some of the manufacturing processes of
Birmingham—its Pins, its Buttons, and its Muskets. This experience was of use to me when I
had to write “The Results of
Machinery.” Some of the recent marvels of
106 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
Birmingham
had not then been called into existence by the discoveries of Science. There was no
manufacture of Electro-plate. The progress of education had not abolished the Quill-pen,
and produced the extensive organization of the manufacture of the Steel-pen. The Birmingham
School of Arts had taken the initiative of Art cultivation, with reference to works of
Industry, long before the Government Schools of Design were established. It was founded in
1821. There was a Mechanics’ Institute, not very flourishing. The chief public
buildings were erected after my visit—the Town-Hall, and the King Edward’s Grammar
School. I spent nearly a week with my hospitable friends, and had seen many things in
Birmingham that were more worth seeing than what Burke saw when he called the busy town of his time, “The Toy-shop
of Europe.”
I returned to London with some valuable additions to my store of knowledge,
and considerable enlargement of mind from my whole tour. As a partial acquaintance with
London had removed many of the prejudices of my early provincial life, so a contemplation
of other great towns had taught me that the energy, the intelligence, the wealth of England
were not exclusively to be sought in the capital. Of the commercial aspects of London I had
really seen very little. Her docks, her manufactories, were for the most part unknown to
me. Of its vast extent I could only form a vague notion. In that summer the stranger in the
metropolis, as well as its constant inhabitants, might acquire some precise ideas of the
great arteries and minute veins, the streets and alleys, through which the vast flood of
human life was daily circulating. The Colosseum in the Regent’s
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 107 |
Park was opened to private visitors, although its Panorama of London was not quite
complete. The Ball and Cross of St. Paul’s having been under repair in the previous
year, Mr. Horner, a meritorious artist, had
undertaken to make a series of panoramic sketches from that giddy height. He invariably
commenced his labours immediately after sunrise, before the lighting of the innumerable
fires, which pour out their dark and sullen clouds during the day, and spread a mantle over
this wide congregation of the dwellings of men, which only midnight can remove. Did the
winds pipe ever so loud, and rock him to and fro in his wicker-basket, there he sat in
lordly security, intently delineating, what few have seen—the whole of the splendid
city—its palaces and its hovels, its churches and its prisons—from one extremity to the
other, spread like a map at his feet. Gradually the signs of life would be audible and
visible from his solitary elevation. The one faint cry of the busy chapman swelling into a
chorus of ardent competitors for public patronage—the distant roll of the solitary wain,
echoed, minute after minute, by the accumulation of the same sound, till all individual
noise was lost in the general din—the first distant smoke rising like a spiral column into
the skies, till column after column sent up their tribute to the approaching gloom, and the
one dense cloud of London was at last formed, and the labours of the painter were at an
end;—these were the daily objects of him who, before the rook went forth for his morning
flight, was gazing upon the most extensive and certainly the most wonderful city of the
world, from the highest pinnacle of a temple which has only one rival for majesty and
beauty. The situation 108 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
was altogether a solemn and an inspiriting
one;—and might well suggest and prolong that enthusiasm which was necessary to the due
performance of the extraordinary task which the painter had undertaken.
Upon the outer circle of the Colosseum was spread Mr. Horner’s panoramic view. I stand on an elevation
which corresponds in size and situation with the external gallery which is round the top of
the dome of St. Paul’s. I am looking down Ludgate Hill. How the streets are filled
with the toil and turmoil of commerce! Turn to the right, the struggle is there going
forward; turn to the left, it is there also. I look from the west to the east, and let the
eye range along the dark and narrow streets that crowd the large space from Cheapside to
the Thames—all are labouring to fill their warehouses with the choicest products of the
earth, or to send our fabrics to the most distant abode of civilized or uncivilized man. I
look beyond, at the river crowded with vessels—the docks, where the masts show like a
forest: and when I have called to mind the riches which are here congregated—the incessant
toil for the support of individual respectability and luxury—the struggles with false
pride—the desperate energy of commercial adventure—the spirit of gambling which brings down
the proud to sudden poverty, and raises the obscure to more dangerous riches—and above all,
amidst this accumulation of wealth, when I consider how many are naked, and starving, and
utterly forsaken of men, I may, perchance think that better social arrangements might
exist, which would leave mankind more free to cultivate the higher attributes of their
nature than the desire of gain; and, without destroying the ordinary excite-
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 109 |
ments to emulation, relieve society of some of its frightful
inequalities.
At this period I was intimate with Robert
Owen. I could not exactly assent to his opinion that in a year or two grass
would be growing in Fleet Street and Cheapside, and the happier human race would be living
in parallelograms upon co-operative principles. I look back now upon this benevolent
visionary with deep respect, for he was no pretender to the character of Reformer. He was
altogether an unselfish man. He had no mercenary views. He spent a large fortune upon his
schemes. He made a great mistake at his outset in thinking that his principles of mundane
happiness could not be accomplished except by the destruction of religious belief. But how
successfully have many practical plans of Co-operation, for Consumption and for Production,
been accomplished in later days! How many noble aspirations have been promulgated under the
influence of what is called Christian Socialism!
During my absence from home my co-editor, Barry
St. Leger, had exclusively attended to the conduct of the “London Magazine.” Our undertaking promised no
great pecuniary advantage; for several years of bad management had reduced that Miscellany
to a much lower level than that of the brilliant days of Charles
Lamb, and Hazlitt, and Hood, and De
Quincey. But it furnished us very agreeable employment from the spring of 1828
till the summer of 1829. My occupations, in connexion with the Useful Knowledge Society,
had then become too engrossing and too important to allow of a continuance on my part of
those pleasant excursions into the field of light periodical literature. What was a
110 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
more serious impediment, the health of my friend and associate had
begun to fail. When I first became acquainted with St. Leger in May,
1824, I published for him one of the most charming volumes of fiction that had its little
hour of fame, and was then forgotten. If any of my readers should find on a book-stall
“Some accounts of the Life of the
late Gilbert Earle, Esq., written by himself,” let him cheerfully bestow a
shilling upon the purchase, and read it as a relief from the extravagant incidents and
flashy style of many of the later race of novelists. The book was ready for publication,
waiting only for the Preface. A physician came to me to say that Mr. St.
Leger was seriously ill; that mental exertion was impossible; and that he
had intimated a wish that I would write the Preface. I did so—not in my own name, but in
that, of the imaginary editor of this Fragment of Autobiography. My friend was sent out of
town, and recovered after an absence of some months. But the malady was only arrested for a
time.
I scarcely know how to speak in terms that should not be considered
extravagant of my affectionate regard for this interesting young man. I have already
alluded to our intercourse at the time of the “Quarterly Magazine” (Vol. I., p. 329). The
“London Magazine” united us still
more firmly in the closest friendship. Of a good family and of high connexions, he moved,
when it so pleased him, in fashionable society; but his enjoyments were in the
companionship of a few lawyers and men of letters in his Chambers. He was amongst the most
welcome of “the old familiar faces” who would come unceremoniously to
dine or to drink tea with my family. He
Ch. V.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 111 |
was fond of children; and my
little girls clung around him to hear his merry anecdotes of Irish humour, or his touching
stories of English poverty, or his picturesque relation of strange scenes that he had
witnessed in India. For in India he had filled a high civil office at a very early age.
About this part of his life there is some mystery; and there are passages in “Gilbert Earle” which are evidently
not absolute fiction. In the latter part of 1829, the disease of the brain, which had
incapacitated him for hard continuous work in letters or in law, returned. After a little
while his case appeared hopeless. I have before me a letter of De Quincey’s, dated February 19, 1830, in which he says,
“Pray tell me something more circumstantial about poor St. Leger. As a man of talents, and a man of most
amiable disposition, I always recollect him with great interest; and from your last
letter I collected that some deplorable calamity had befallen him, of the nature of
apoplexy or paralysis—but not exactly which, or when, or under what prospect of
restoration.” Before this letter arrived I had followed him to his grave. He
was to have been the godfather of my only son.
St. Leger left unfinished “Selections from the Old Chroniclers,” which
posthumous work was published by Mr. Colburn. There
are historical dissertations prefixed to some of the extracts, which are really valuable,
exhibiting qualities which would have carried him onward to a richer field of literature
than he had previously attempted to cultivate.
In the summer of 1828, so far were the Londoners from the belief that grass
would be growing in their streets, that they were occupied with many schemes for easier and
quicker communication between their
112 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. V. |
great city and its suburbs. The
experiments which had been making for the improvement of the locomotive steam-engine upon
railways—which Telford described before a Committee
of the House of Commons as indicating the possibility of accomplishing fifteen or even
twenty miles an hour—had set invention to work to produce a steam-carriage for common
roads. I went to see such a machine at the manufactory of Messrs.
Bramah. This notion was ridiculed at a somewhat earlier epoch,
when the visions of science were the favourite objects of literary satire. A very clever
novel of this character was read by me in my boyish hours. It was called Flim flams, and was attributed to the elder D’Israeli. From a manuscript letter of
Miss Cartwright, the daughter of the famous
inventor of the Power Loom, I transcribe the following anecdote: “There is in
D’Israeli’s Flim
Flams, a curious and laughable description of an inventor coming down to see
the hero of the book, in a carriage worked by steam, and arriving in such a state of
perspiration, that he is represented as smoking like a boiled potato. I remember that
my father was exceedingly amused with this description, which he told me originated in
a conversation he had with D’Israeli on the subject of
steam-carriages, and which, at the time, the latter good-humouredly quizzed, and I
think threatened to introduce him and his carriage into print.”
J. H. Abraham (1777-1846)
Quaker Schoolmaster at the Milk Street Academy, Sheffield, inventor, and member of the
Sheffield Literary and Philosophical Society.
Sir Richard Arkwright (1732-1792)
Inventor of a spinning machine patented in 1769 and cotton manufacturer.
Samuel Bailey (1791-1870)
Educated at the Moravian school in Fulneck, he was a Sheffield banker, political
economist, and president of the Sheffield Literary and Philosophical Society.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Irish politician and opposition leader in Parliament, author of
On the
Sublime and Beautiful (1757) and
Reflections on the Revolution
in France (1790).
Frances Dorothy Cartwright (1780-1863)
The daughter of the poet and inventor Edmund Cartwright; she wrote poems and published a
biography of her uncle, the radical Major John Cartwright (1826).
King Charles I of England (1600-1649)
The son of James VI and I; as king of England (1625-1649) he contended with Parliament;
he was revered as a martyr after his execution.
Henry Colburn (1785-1855)
English publisher who began business about 1806; he co-founded the
New
Monthly Magazine in 1814 and was publisher of the
Literary
Gazette from 1817.
John Conolly (1794-1866)
English physician who studied in Edinburgh and was physician to the Hanwell Lunatic
Asylum.
Charles Cotton (1630-1687)
English poet, translator, and friend of Isaac Walton; author of
Scarronides, or Virgile travestie (1664).
Isaac D'Israeli (1766-1848)
English essayist and literary biographer; author of
Curiosities of
Literature (1791). Father of the prime minister.
Thomas De Quincey (1785-1859)
English essayist and man of letters; he wrote for the
London
Magazine and
Blackwood's, and was author of
Confessions of an English Opium-Eater (1821).
William Felkin (1795-1874)
Nottingham manufacturer and social reformer who published
History of
the Machine-Wrought Hosiery and Lace Manufactures (1867)
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
English essayist and literary critic; author of
Characters of
Shakespeare's Plays (1817),
Lectures on the English Poets
(1818), and
The Spirit of the Age (1825).
Edward Higginson (1781-1832)
Unitarian minister educated at the New College, Manchester; he served at Stockport
(1800-10) and Derby (1810-32). Charles Knight described him as “the very clever
minister of Derby.”
Arthur Hill (1798-1885)
The son of Thomas Wright Hill and brother of Sir Rowland Hill, he was headmaster at Bruce
Castle School and the father of George Birkbeck Norman Hill.
Edwin Hill (1793-1876)
The son of Thomas Wright Hill and brother of Sir Rowland Hill, he was a manager in the
family schools who pursued a career as an inventor.
Matthew Davenport Hill (1792-1872)
English barrister, the brother of Sir Rowland Hill; he was MP for Hull (1833-35),
recorder of Birmingham (1839) and a reformer of criminal laws.
Sir Rowland Hill (1795-1879)
The son of Thomas Wright Hill; he was a civil servant who instituted the penny postage in
1840.
Thomas Wright Hill (1763-1851)
Educated at Kidderminster grammar school, he was an associate of Joseph Priestly, founder
of a system of utilitarian schooling, and father of notable sons, several of whom taught in
his schools.
Thomas Hood (1799-1845)
English poet and humorist who wrote for the
London Magazine; he
published
Whims and Oddities (1826) and
Hood's
Magazine (1844-5).
Thomas Hornor (1785-1844)
English surveyor and landscape artist who in 1825 began work on a panoramic view of
London taken from St. Paul's Cathedral to be displayed in Regent's Park; the project fell
into financial difficulties and the artist died impoverished in New York City.
John Hutchinson (1615-1664)
Educated at Peterhouse, Cambridge, he was a military officer, governor of Nottingham
Castle, and MP for Nottinghamshire who signed the death warrant for Charles I. His wife
Lucy wrote his biography.
Lucy Hutchinson [née Apsley] (1620-1681)
The of Sir Allen Apsley who wrote the biography of her regicide husband John Hutchinson
(d. 1664),
Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson, first
published in 1806.
Charles Lamb [Elia] (1775-1834)
English essayist and boyhood friend of Coleridge at Christ's Hospital; author of
Essays of Elia published in the
London
Magazine (collected 1823, 1833) and other works.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
James Montgomery (1771-1854)
English poet and editor of the
Sheffield Iris (1795-1825); author
of
The Wanderer of Switzerland (1806) and
The
World before the Flood (1813).
Robert Owen (1771-1858)
English reformer who operated the cotton mill at New Lanark in Scotland and in 1825
founded the utopian community of New Harmony in Indiana.
Joseph Parkes (1796-1865)
Tutored by Samuel Parr and educated at Greenwich under Charles Burney, he was a
correspondent of Jeremy Bentham who pursued a career as an election agent and political
reformer.
Richard Priestley (1771 c.-1852)
London bookseller who specialized in Greek and Roman classics; he died impoverished in
the Charterhouse.
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
Francis Barry Boyle St. Leger (1799-1829)
Irish poet and novelist, educated at Rugby School; he wrote for the
New
Monthly Magazine and
Knight's Quarterly Magazine, was
co-editor of the
London Magazine, and was editor of
The Album and the
Brazen Head.
Jedediah Strutt (1726-1797)
Originally a wheelwright, he was an inventor and partner of Richard Arkwright in the
cotton manufacturing industry.
Joseph Strutt (1765-1844)
The son of Jedediah Strutt; he was a Derbyshire cotton manufacturer who founded a
Lancastrian school and mechanics' institute.
William Strutt (1756-1830)
Son of Jedediah Strutt; he was a Derbyshire cotton manufacturer and philanthropist, and a
friend of Erasmus Drawn, Thomas Moore, and Samuel Rogers.
Charles Sylvester (1774-1828)
A Sheffield autodidact and writer who worked as an inventor and engineer with William
Strutt at the Royal Infirmary, Derby. Maria Edgeworth described him as “a man of
surprising abilities, of a calm and fearless mind.”
John Sylvester (1798-1852)
The son of Charles Sylvester (d. 1828); like his father he was a civil engineer who
worked on heating and ventilating systems; he was a fellow of the Royal Society.
Thomas Telford (1757-1834)
Civil engineer who did innovative work with roads, canals, and bridges; he was a friend
of Archibald Alison, Thomas Campbell, and Robert Southey.
Izaak Walton (1593-1683)
The friend and biographer of John Donne, and author of
The Compleat
Angler (1653).
Jesse Watts Russell (1786-1875)
Of Ilam Hall, Staffordshire; the son of a wealthy London soap manufacturer, he married an
heiress and was Tory MP for Gatton (1820-26).
The London Magazine. (1820-1829). Founded by John Scott as a monthly rival to
Blackwood's, the
London Magazine included among its contributors Charles Lamb, John Clare, Allan Cunningham,
Thomas De Quincey, and Thomas Hood.