Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter VIII
CHAPTER VIII.
THE Grey ministry came into
power surrounded by circumstances of domestic politics that might well be considered
alarming. After the harvest of 1830, there had broken out in the southern agricultural
counties what, without exaggeration, may be called a servile insurrection. The ignorance of
the labouring population of these districts had become too appalling to be any longer
concealed under the most meagre and unsatisfactory attempts of the gentry and the clergy,
during the past twenty years, to impart the least portion of knowledge to the young, or to
evince any care for the condition of the adults beyond the grudging bounty of the
Poor-rate, and an extra dole of bread at Christmas. The thinking portion of the population
could not forbear to exclaim,—is it not monstrous, in a country which possesses endowed
schools in every town, which has National schools, and Lancasterian schools, and Sunday
schools in every village; and, above all, which has ten thousand beneficed clergymen
distributed over the whole land, that any such state of ignorance should exist as would
lead to rick-burning and machine-breaking?
The outrages of the peasantry in many parishes, especially of Hampshire,
Wiltshire, Kent, Berkshire, and Buckinghamshire, had spoken with a voice of
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 159 |
terror to those who had lulled themselves into a shameless neglect of
their duty, by the miserable belief that in the intellectual darkness of the labourers
consisted their own security from such organizations as the Luddism of manufacturing
districts. No vigorous measures had been taken to repress the new-born frenzy of the
agricultural slave—the successor of the ancient serf (but without the protection of his
lord)—until, on the 8th of December, a circular was addressed by the recently appointed
Home Secretary to the magistracy of the various
counties, calling upon them to act with energy and firmness, and to yield nothing to
intimidation, either as respected the demand for a uniform rate of wages or the
non-employment of thrashing machines. On the 18th of December a special commission was
opened at Winchester, when two hundred and seventy persons were arraigned for incendiary
acts, or for the destruction of machinery.
The Useful Knowledge Society had, in November, commenced the issue of a
small series entitled “The Working Man’s
Companion,” to be published occasionally, at the price of a shilling. The
first volume, chiefly prepared by Dr. Conolly,
called “Cottage Evenings,”
was commended by Dr. Arnold, for “its plain
and sensible tone;” but he is hard upon what he calls its “cold
deism.” He is equally severe upon “the folly” of a little
monthly publication conducted I believe by a divine
who was afterwards a bishop—“The
Cottager’s Monthly Visitor.” At the beginning of December I
conceived the possibility of addressing the labourer and the mechanic upon the subject of
machinery, by reasoning with them without attempting the slightest distinction between the
intellectual
160 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
capacity of the poor and of the rich; for in truth upon
the question whether machinery had not a tendency to abridge employment and reduce wages,
there was nearly as large an amount of error existing amongst the middle classes, and even
amongst some of the upper, as amongst those we were in the habit of denominating the
working classes. It was not likely that a little book of a sober and argumentative
character which contained no appeals to the passions, which rested the strength of its
assaults against long cherished prejudices upon a battery of facts, brought to bear on one
most vulnerable point, should save a single thrashing machine from the infuriate hand of an
unreasoning peasant; but no good seed is utterly thrown away, even if it fall at first upon
a barren soil. It would scarcely become me to speak of the almost unparalleled success of
that volume. Some portion of its
original popularity may be ascribed to the circumstance of its having being attributed,
without the slightest foundation, to the pen of Lord
Brougham. Within a month of its publication, at the beginning of January,
1831, I received the formal thanks of the Useful Knowledge Committee, expressed by the
chairman of the day, Mr. Spring Rice, who said, perhaps
somewhat hyperbolically, that it had effected more good for the repression of outrage than
a regiment of horse would have effected in any disturbed county.
The agricultural labourers were not altogether given over to an
undiscriminating rage in their Jacquerie. In the neighbourhood of
Aylesbury they destroyed all the machinery of many farms down even to the common drills,
but they could not make up their minds as to the propriety of destroying a
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 161 |
horse-churn. In the same manner there were artisans in many trades
who were equally inconsistent in their hostility to machinery. For example: The bookbinders
of London took a similar exceptional view of what they considered the evil of substituting
the easier way of getting through work for the harder. They objected to a novelty which had
begun to be generally used by the master bookbinders. In a paper, dated the 16th December,
1830, nearly five hundred journeymen bookbinders of London and Westminster called upon
their employers to give up the use of a machine for beating books. Books, before they were
bound in leather, were formerly beaten with large hammers upon a stone to make them solid.
In my little work I said: “The objection of the bookbinders to the beating-machine
offers a remarkable example of the inconsistency of all such objections. The
bookbinders have a machine called a plough, for cutting the edges of books, which is,
probably, as old as the trade itself. A great deal of labour and a great deal of
material are saved by this plough. Why do they not require that a book should be cut
with a ruler and a penknife?” The journeymen bookbinders, in a pamphlet of
thirty pages, published a very elaborate reply to my assertion, that “the greatest
blessing ever conferred upon bookbinders, as a body, was the introduction of this
beating (more properly rolling) machine; for it had set at liberty a quantity of mere
labour, without skill, to furnish wages to labourers with skill.” They
contended that the number of journeymen bookbinders out of employ was rapidly on the
increase, that the rolling machine was one of the great causes of their distress, and that,
commi-162 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
serating their evil lot, some of their employers had agreed
to abandon the machine altogether. It may be thought that I have drawn attention somewhat
too fully to this instance of short-sightedness on the part of an intelligent body of
workmen. I have done so because the progress of knowledge could not have been advanced as
it has been during the last half century, had the cost of the material production of books
not gone on at a constant rate of diminution, exactly in proportion to the increase of the
amount of mental labour also required for their production. Bookbinding is now one of the
large manufactures of London, carried on with many scientific applications. The journeymen
bookbinders of 1830, in the metropolis, reckoned their entire number as nearly six hundred.
In the census of occupations of 1861 we find that in the metropolitan district there were
employed in bookbinding three thousand six hundred and ninety-one males and four thousand
and sixty-three females. This prodigious increase of employment has followed the
introduction of new machines in every department of bookbinding. “We have
rolling-machines to make the book solid; cutting-machines, to supersede the handlabour
of the little instrument called a plough; embossing machines, to produce elaborate
raised patterns on leather or cloth; embossing presses, to give the gilt ornament and
lettering. These contrivances, and other similar inventions, have not only cheapened
books, but have enabled the publisher to give them a permanent instead of a temporary
cover, ornamental as well as useful.”*
Ch. VIII.] |
THE SECOND EPOCH. |
163 |
The “Quarterly Journal of
Education” was commenced to be published on the 1st of January, 1831.
Although under the superintendence of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, I
bore, as publisher, the risk of the undertaking. The control of the committee over the
various papers was professedly confined to a general superintendence. Within certain limits
it was thought useful to allow contributors a free expression of their views. Such a work,
whose object was to diffuse a fair and unbiassed criticism on establishments for education,
and on the systems and on the books which constitute their real life and existence, was a
novelty in this country. There had, indeed, been published for some years, in London,
“The Sunday School Teacher’s
Magazine and Journal of Education,” but the plan of the work commenced in
1831 was essentially different. “It is the opinion of the committee that the
general education of those classes of the community who, from their station in society,
have the control over that of the poorer classes, is the most important object to which
they can direct their attention. They do not intend to neglect either the statistics of
the education of the poorer classes, or the books which are used for their instruction,
nor any other fact of any kind that concerns so large a part of the population. But the
education of that class, on which depends the education of all the rest, demands their
especial attention.”
The “Journal of
Education” was regularly continued during five years. When I state that
its editor was Professor Long, whose high
qualifications as the conductor of any publication requiring learning and general
information, I have briefly adverted to: and
164 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
when I add that it
numbered amongst its contributors men of such eminence as Dr.
Whately, Dr. Thirlwall, and Dr. Arnold, with many heads of schools and teachers
engaged in the practical business of instruction, it is scarcely necessary to say that the
four thousand pages of which this work consists embrace a mass of information of original
value and general interest. They have an historical importance, for in the details of the
systems then prevalent in our universities, our public schools, and our establishments for
middle-class education, it will be seen that enormous efforts have been made to repair and
to reconstruct decayed institutions and systems out of harmony with the character of the
age. There was a great work to be accomplished to take the education of all classes out of
the hands of incompetent and prejudiced instructors, and to free the young, upon whose
judicious training the welfare of another generation would depend, from that discipline
which united the extremes of laxity and severity, and that routine which, relying upon
forms, so constantly neglected essentials.
As, from the constitution of the Useful Knowledge Society, works on
religious subjects were excepted from the critical notices which occupied a considerable
part of the Journal, so also any infusion of party politics into its essays or reviews was
carefully avoided. There is, however, in the fourth volume a review of Austin’s “Province of Jurisprudence Determined,” which
admirably draws the line between political speculations arising out of party debates, and
the principles of positive law and government, with reference to the introduction of
political instruction into the education of youth. That review was written by the late
Sir George Cornewall Lewis,
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 165 |
and it shows how early he had directed his mind to the consideration of practical
statesmanship under its highest philosophical aspects. How true it is, even now, in too
frequent instances, that “those who have been concerned for many years in the
practical administration of government, in discussing the policy of laws, present or
future, or in learning or arguing upon the contents and provisions of laws, hold it an
affront if any one offers to teach them what government or law is, and, confounding
familiar acquaintance with accurate knowledge, think that they understand everything
which is not new or strange to them.”
The “Journal of
Education” was commenced a month after the accession of the Grey ministry. At the first monthly meeting of the Useful
Knowledge Committee following the Christmas vacation, our table presented a scene which
lives in my mind as one of national importance. The chambers of the society were then in
Gray’s Inn Square; but the accommodation therein was quite insufficient for the
company expected at the dinner. We met, therefore, at the Gray’s Inn Coffee House. I
well remember talking with Mr. Lubbock about the
extraordinary spectacle of so many men of political importance—cabinet ministers, great
officers of state and of the law—assembled in frank fellowship with physicians, professors
of education, elders of science, astronomers and mathematicians just rising into note in
the world of wider limits than Cambridge, and barristers not yet aspiring to silk gowns. It
was really very striking to observe how, as it were, by one simultaneous movement, nearly
all the committee had come together to hail the triumph
166 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
of liberal
opinions. Not a word was spoken of politics. Lord
Brougham did not explain how he meant to keep his pledge about Reform.
Lord John Russell gave no hint of the scope of the
vital measure which the Cabinet was then discussing. It was as practical and common-place a
proceeding for confirming minutes and voting small sums for authorship as I ever witnessed.
I am not sure whether any new members were elected. I believe it was at another meeting
that the proposal of Mr. Hume’s name as a
member was evaded by a joke—The great economist would take the dots off the i’s, when a proof came under his correction.
During the month of February one or two came within my observation, as
intimates of men in power, who seemed unusually abstracted or unusually volatile. On the
3rd of that month Lord Althorp had informed the House
of Commons that the Government plan for amending the representation of the people would be
brought forward by Lord John Russell on the 1st of
March. The few in the secret talked in this interim with prodigious fluency upon matters in
which they felt little interest, like Cinna and
Casca debating about the exact point of sunrise
when their minds were stirred with the thought of “the dreadful thing”
they were to act when the sun had risen. The half confidences, the guesses, the hopes and
the fears, the trust and the contempt, which indicated the speculative politicians of
either side, were to some a very significant token that a great crisis was approaching.
It is not for me here to indicate, except in the most general manner, the
course of parliamentary proceedings on the Reform Bill. The men of influ-
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 167 |
ence with whom I was more immediately connected were far too much
engaged to give any marked attention to the ordinary proceedings of the Useful Knowledge
Society. In the course of the first stage of the Reform measure there were remarkable
separations of ancient friends, and as remarkable unions between men who had been of
opposite opinions. Mr. Macaulay had taken a most
distinguished position, in the very earliest debates of the session. Mr. Praed, whose youthful prepossessions, if not
convictions, were perhaps even stronger than Mr. Macaulay’s, was
diametrically opposed to him; and yet I could not admit that
Praed’s maturer opinions were the results of a want of
principle, or not feel that he was ungenerously dealt with when one who had been his
contemporary in the university, himself taking rank as a man of genius, a poet and a
novelist, cast reproaches upon him in Parliament for his opinions when an under-graduate.
Yet I could scarcely have expected in those early days of the struggle for Reform that I
should have met Mr. Croker and Mr.
Praed walking arm-in-arm in the Strand, and each giving me a friendly nod as
I passed them. Public men had very soon taken their sides in this great contest, and so
indeed had the great body of the middle classes. The majority, however, when they met in
the meetings which were held in almost every parish vociferated: “The Bill, the
whole Bill, and nothing but the Bill.” During eight weeks of intense
excitement, the popular cause was gradually attaining strength without doors, but the
opponents of the Government were as steadily gaining ground in divisions upon which the
question of a violent or a peaceful revolution depended. At length the king 168 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
consented to dissolve Parliament under circumstances of which
Lord Campbell truly writes, that the scenes within
the Houses “might convey an adequate idea of the tumultuary dissolutions in the
times of the Stuarts.” There was an illumination in
London, with a disgraceful but harmless exhibition of mob violence. Windows were broken,
amongst others those of the Duke of Wellington, and the
great captain thought it prudent to give his mansion of Apsley House something like the
aspect of a beleagured fortress.
The results of the elections throughout the country materially strengthened
the popular cause. On the 24th of June, Lord John
Russell again obtained leave to bring in the Reform Bill. It finally passed
in the House of Commons on the 21st of September. After five nights of debate, unsurpassed
in the annals of the English Parliament for the utterances of men who were indeed
“the top of eloquence,” the House of Lords rejected the Bill by a
majority of forty-one. Parliament was again prorogued. Riot and outrage at Derby, and the
burning of Nottingham Castle, clouded the hopes of all honest men of either party that the
great question might be settled without violence. It was not to be so.
During the proceedings in Parliament of that eventful autumn, I had been
occupied in writing a little book that was in some degree a supplement to “The Results of Machinery.” It was
originally called “The Rights of
Industry;” but is better known by its second title, “Capital and Labour.” It was especially addressed to working
men, to exhibit their rights in connexion with their duties by proving that the interests
of every member of society, properly understood, are one and the same. “The
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 169 |
more,” I said, “that you perfect in yourselves
the character of industrious, temperate, intelligent, and orderly members of the
community, the more you will advance the interests of the great nation of which you
form so important a part,—and the more you will succeed in obtaining a full share of
those national blessings which are the invariable results of Security of Property and
Freedom of Industry, established in their just relations to each other by equal laws.
Whatever is wanting to the perfection of that balance, must be won by your own steady
advancement in knowledge and virtue.”* It had become a matter of grave
necessity that from some influential source, such as that of the Useful Knowledge Society,
should go forth a popular exposition of the cardinal points of political economy, as far as
related to the Production of Wealth. The questions regarding its Distribution were reserved
for another possible treatise; but at this time the complicated problem of that
Distribution was proposed to be solved by pretended teachers of political economy, who were
ranting in popular assemblies about the unequal allotment of riches, and proposing schemes
for the “division of property,” whose absurdity rendered them in some degree
more dangerous at a time when many of the uneducated were moved rather by passion than by
reason. But there was a class in the very lowest depths of ignorance, who were incapable of
exercising their reasoning powers, either for good or for evil, upon any abstract question
of the relations which held society together in mutual rights, duties, and interests. It
was this class that
170 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
burnt Bristol on the 29th of October. “Capital and Labour” was ready for publication, when this event called for
a conclusion of the treatise, in which I appealed to the great body of the working men of
our country, each in his own circle, to put down that ignorant spirit which would make this
temple of our once industrious and peaceful island a den of thieves. I thus wrote:
“When the ignorance of great masses of people is manifested by the
light of a burning city, the records of that ignorance remain, in ruins which attest
the hideous force of lawless violence. If the restraints of
order are again set up, the ruins are cleared away; and, slowly, perhaps, but
certainly, capital again ventures forth to repair the destruction which a contempt of
its rights had produced. But let the spirit of violence long continue to exist in
sullen contests with the laws, or in causeless jealousy of the possessors of property,
and the spirit of decay is established. Then begins a silent but
certain career of destruction, more sweeping and wide-spreading than all the havoc that
civil war upon the most fearful scale has ever produced. Houses are no longer burnt,
but they become untenanted; manufactories are no longer pulled down, but the sound of
labour is heard no more within their walls; barns are no longer plundered to distribute
their stores, but the fields are not sown which were wont to produce those stores;
roads are no longer rendered impassable by hostile bands, but the traffic which once
supported them has ceased; canals and rivers are not dry, but their waters are mantled
over with weeds, for the work of communication is ended; harbours and docks are not
washed
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 171 |
away by the sea, but the ships that once spread their
sails for every corner of the earth lie idly within their bosoms, rotting ‘sheer
hulks,’ abandoned to the destruction of the wind and the wave. In the meantime,
while all this silent decay goes forward, and many a mouldering pile proclaims that the
reign of justice is at an end, the people are continuing to perish from the face of the
land. Famine and pestilence sweep away their prey by thousands; and the robber who
walks abroad at noon-day selects his victims from the few who still struggle to hide a
miserable remnant of former abundance. At length tranquillity is established—but it is
the tranquillity of death. The destroyers have done their work; They make a solitude, and call it peace.* |
These, assuredly, would be the consequences of following the blind guides that
would break down the empire of property. These advocates of your ‘rights’
would give you weeds instead of corn, skins instead of cloth, hollow trees instead of
houses; and when you had gone back to the ‘freedom’ of savage life, and
each of the scattered tenants of a country covered with the ruins of former wealth,
could exclaim ‘I am lord of the fowl and the brute,’ these ministers of
desolation would be able to sing their triumphal song of ‘Labour defended against
the claims of Capital,’ amid the shriek of the jackal and the howl of the
wolf.Ӡ
* Byron; who translates the
passage literally from Tacitus.
† “Capital and
Labour,” p. 211. Edition, November, 1831. I should not have introduced
this passage, which has especial reference to a condition of ignorance happily passed
away, had it
|
172 |
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: |
[Ch. VIII. |
The November of 1831 was a time of national dismay far more intense than
any alarm that mob-violence could produce in a country of settled law and government. The
Cholera-morbus had come to England. Cases terminating fatally had been reported at
Sunderland, and on the 6th of November the people were kneeling in the churches to join in
an authorised form of prayer—“Lord turn away from us that grievous calamity
against which our only security is in Thy compassion.” The contagion
continued to spread throughout the country until, in the middle of February, 1832, cases of
cholera were first observed in London. My family were then living at Hampstead, and I had
frequently to go to London by the stage-coach. The conversation of the passengers was
naturally of a melancholy cast, as indeed was that of all persons in public places or in
private circles. The disputes and animosities arising out of the Reform Bill seemed to be
forgotten. Instances daily presented themselves as the theme of sorrowful and serious
reflection: how the Deputy of a certain Ward had been dining with his Company the day
before and was dead in the next afternoon; how another citizen had been taken ill during a
journey to the north, and had died at an inn with no relative or friend to receive his last
wishes. Examples were given of the impartiality with which the great Leveller performed his
work. Some thought that the establishment of a General Board of Health was a wise measure;
others that it would be useless, for this new Plague must run its course. Many took
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 173 |
that selfish view of their own safety which had been recommended by a
periodical writer—to isolate themselves entirely from their neighbours, send away all
superfluous servants, lay in a large store of provisions, and wait the visitation in gloomy
security.
The great body of the British people were of a nobler temper. The rich did
not shrink from their duty to the poor; the minister of religion did not hesitate to go
fearlessly into the most filthy and pest-breeding districts, to utter the sacred words of
hope and comfort; the physician, in this dread assault of a new and mysterious enemy, would
rather have been the foremost of a forlorn hope, to encounter many “’scapes
in the imminent deadly breach,” where the victims were lying in heaps, than
sit in his easy-chair to wait for the fees of frightened great ones. This visitation left
the people sadder and wiser. They learnt the value of some of the great principles upon
which the public health depended, and from that time there grew up a respect for sanitary
regulations which had once been scouted as absurd and effeminate. In the series of the
“Working Man’s Companion” we did not
neglect the occasion for combating popular errors of a social character, of inculcating the
great private duties of cleanliness and temperance as regarded ourselves and our families,
and of active benevolence and sympathy for our fellow-creatures. Dr. Conolly’s little book on Cholera was a model of what a popular
treatise on the preservation of health ought to be—not leading the delicate and the
hypochondriacal to fancy they can prescribe for themselves in real illness; not
undervaluing medicine, but showing how rarely is medicine necessary when the laws of nature
are not habitually
174 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
violated. Of the fatal epidemic that had come
amongst us this wise and kind physician spoke with confidence of its speedy removal, under
God’s providence, in a condition of society where the principles of cordial
brotherhood should more prevail than the miserable suggestions of selfish exclusiveness;
where in fact the safety of the upper classes depended upon the well-being of the lower.
From the permanent blessing of that cholera-time—a blessing which it left behind instead of
a curse—it grew, that the public health became one of the chief cares of the Government. A
machinery was gradually organized, under which the effects of any pest can be removed or
mitigated; and, what is of more importance, that the constantly present causes of disease
should be grappled with—that typhus should be prevented as sedulously as cholera. Thus it
has arisen, out of the calamity of 1831, that the whole body of the people have been
elevated in their condition, and that the duration of life in England has reached an
average which the Tables of Mortality of the last generation could not contemplate.
Parliament had re-assembled in the first week of December, and on the 12th
Lord John Russell introduced a new bill for
Parliamentary Reform. The first and second bills had been founded upon the census of 1821,
in regulating the disfranchising clauses of boroughs with reference to the amount of the
population. The results of the Census of 1831 were now to furnish a much safer guide. In
addition to this essential change, the boundaries of many towns were carefully surveyed,
and populous districts were included in boroughs, of which they had previously formed no
portion. The superintendence of
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 175 |
this most important operation was
confided to Lieutenant Thomas Drummond, of the Royal
Engineers. He had been previously distinguished, when a very young man, by his beautiful
invention of what is now known as the Drummond Light, which was of material use in the
survey of Ireland, wherein he was employed. Lord
Brougham, it is said, had a hard battle to fight in the Cabinet to carry his
point of intrusting the responsibility of arranging the boundaries of boroughs to one
unaccustomed to administrative functions. But Lieutenant
Drummond’s eminent abilities fully vindicated the perseverance of the
Chancellor. I saw little during the passing of the Reform Bill of him who had won this
confidence; but I had frequent communications with him when he became Lord Althorp’s private secretary. No one who had
business with him could fail to see the quickness of his perceptions, and the soundness of
his judgment. Becoming Under-Secretary for Ireland, in 1835, he seemed, in his
comprehensive plans for railways and for social improvements arising out of them, to bid
fair to become the true Liberator of the sister island, who would build her happiness upon
the cultivation of her great material resources. His death, in 1840, cut short this hope.
The Reform Bill, thus improved in its machinery but rendered less effective, some thought,
in its vital changes, was passed in the House of Commons, on the 19th of March. The bill
was then passed in the Lords by a majority of nine; but it soon became manifest that its
efficacy would be materially impaired as it went through the committee. Ministers were in a
minority in that committee.
A crisis had come. The King refused to
create
176 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VIII. |
peers, and Lord Grey
resigned. For one week the country was almost without a government. It was understood that
the Duke of Wellington had failed in forming an
administration which would adopt some comprehensive measure of Reform according to the wish
of the King. In a week Lord Grey was again in power. But that interval
was one of intense apprehension in London, and of more fears of popular outbreaks in the
great provincial towns. When it was heard that a regiment of cavalry quartered at
Birmingham had employed the Sunday in sharpening their swords, it was time for all good men
to strive to avert the omen of a bloody revolution, instead of a peaceful Reform. The
compromise by which this good was effected was such as the long training of Englishmen in
political contests, which do not mean civil war, could alone have accomplished. The Reform
Bill became the law of the land.
The Parliament was dissolved. A new Parliament was to be elected upon a
broader basis. Large bodies of men throughout the country were to participate in the
franchise, and for the first time to put on the rights and duties of electors. Everywhere
there were candidates giving pledges. Everywhere electors new to the office had to learn
the difference between representatives and delegates. Then was called forth all the
mysterious machinery by which, in ancient cities and boroughs, elections had been wont to
be carried. For myself, I had never taken any part in civic proceedings, but having met
Sir John Key, the Lord Mayor, at a public dinner,
he asked me when the company was separating, to go with him where I might witness a curious
scene. At a tavern of no very elevated character, near the King’s printing
Ch. VIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 177 |
office, we were ushered up-stairs. The door of a large room was
thrown open; the waiter shouted out “The Lord Mayor;” there was a
violent rapping of tables, but nothing could be seen, for a dense cloud of tobacco-smoke
filled the whole space. Sir John Key was led to a place of dignity,
and I was seated at a crowded table. As the smoke cleared away I saw a well-known tailor of
Fleet Street elevated on a chair of state, with a silver chain round his neck. On his right
hand sat Mr. Grote, the eminent banker, and now more
eminent historian. Sir John Key was placed on the chairman’s
left hand. They were the Liberal candidates for the City. I was soon made acquainted with
the nature of the honourable society into which I was thrown, for, with all due
formalities, I was made a member of the Lumber Troop, in whose records could be traced, I
was assured, their origin at the time of the Spanish Armada, as an integral portion of the
Train Bands. This distinguished corps had not to go forth, as of old, against the fierce
Rupert in his march upon London; their duty was to
preserve such an organisation as would give them a voice potential in the representation of
the City, which power I might be assured they would be ever ready, as at the present time,
to exercise in the cause of freedom and of progress. It was not for me to express my belief
that a little honest conviviality might have had as much effect in keeping them together,
as any abstract devotion to the high principle by which the Londoners had of old maintained
their liberties.
Thomas Arnold (1795-1842)
Of Corpus Christi College, Oxford; he was headmaster of Rugby School (1827-42) and father
of the poet Matthew Arnold.
John Austin (1790-1859)
Called to the bar from the Inner Temple, he wrote for the
Westminster
Review and was a legal philosopher and professor of law at University of London
(1826).
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
John Campbell, first baron Campbell (1779-1861)
Barrister and biographer; he was a liberal MP for Stafford (1830-32), Dudley (1832-34),
and Edinburgh (1834-41); created Baron Campbell (1841), lord chancellor (1859).
John Conolly (1794-1866)
English physician who studied in Edinburgh and was physician to the Hanwell Lunatic
Asylum.
John Wilson Croker (1780-1857)
Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's
Life of
Johnson (1831).
George Davys, bishop of Peterborough (1780-1864)
Educated at Christ's College, Cambridge, he was tutor to Queen Victoria, dean of Chester
(1831), and bishop of Peterborough (1839).
Thomas Drummond (1797-1840)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was an inventor of scientific instruments, chairman
of the Parliamentary Boundary Commission (1831), and under-secretary of Ireland
(1835).
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
George Grote (1794-1871)
English historian, a member of Bentham's circle and writer for the
Westminster Review; he was a founder of London University, of which he was
president in 1868, and MP for London (1832-41).
David Hume (1757-1838)
The nephew of the philosopher; he was educated at University of Edinburgh and Glasgow
University and was a member of the Speculative Society, professor of Scots law in the
University of Edinburgh, and baron of the exchequer. He contributed to
The Mirror and
The Lounger.
Sir John Key, first baronet (1794-1858)
A wholesale stationer, he was sheriff of London and Middlesex in 1824, lord mayor in
1830, and MP for the City, 1832-33.
William Lamb, second viscount Melbourne (1779-1848)
English statesman, the son of Lady Melbourne (possibly by the third earl of Egremont) and
husband of Lady Caroline Lamb; he was a Whig MP, prime minister (1834-41), and counsellor
to Queen Victoria.
Sir George Cornewall Lewis, second baronet (1806-1863)
The son of the first baronet (d. 1855); educated at Eton, Christ Church, Oxford, and the
Middle Temple, he was a barrister, author, editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1850), chancellor of the exchequer (1855-58), and home secretary and war
secretary (1859-63).
George Long (1800-1879)
After education at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was professor of classical languages at
the University of Virginia (1824-28) and University College, London (1828-31,
1842-46).
Sir John William Lubbock, third baronet (1803-1865)
Banker, mathematician, and treasurer of the Royal Society; educated at Eton and Trinity
College, Cambridge, he was active in the Society for the Promotion of Useful
Knowledge.
Thomas Spring Rice, first Baron Monteagle (1790-1866)
The son of Stephen Edward of Limerick; he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and
was MP for Limerick City (1820-32) and Cambridge borough (1832-39). He was chancellor of
the exchequer (1835-39) and contributed to the
Edinburgh
Review.
Prince Rupert (1619-1682)
The son of Frederick V, Elector Palatine and nephew of Charles I, he was commander of the
Royalist cavalry during the English Civil War.
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
John Charles Spencer, third earl Spencer (1782-1845)
English politician, son of the second earl (d. 1834); educated at Harrow and Trinity
College, Cambridge, he was Whig MP for Northamptonshire (1806-34) and chancellor of the
exchequer and leader of the lower house under Lord Grey (1830).
Edward Stanley, first Baron Monteagle (1460 c.-1523)
The son of Thomas Stanley, first earl of Derby; fighting under Thomas Howard, earl of
Surrey, he was instrumental in the English victory at Flodden Field.
Connop Thirlwall, bishop of St David's (1797-1875)
Educated at Charterhouse and Trinity College, Cambridge, he published
History of Greece, 8 vols (1835–44) and was appointed bishop of St David's in
1840.
Richard Whately, archbishop of Dublin (1787-1863)
The nephew of the Shakespeare critic Thomas Whately (d. 1772); he was educated at Oriel
College, Oxford where he was professor of political economy (1829-31) and was archbishop of
Dublin (1831-63). A prolific writer, he offered a rationalist defense of
Anglicanism.