Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter X
CHAPTER X.
“THE success of the ‘Penny Magazine’ has induced the Committee to undertake
the publication of a ‘Penny
Cyclopædia,’ in Numbers and Monthly Parts. A work of such magnitude
and novelty requires all the assistance which can be afforded it by the Members of the
Society, both in London and in the Country, in order to give it publicity and
circulation.” Such was the announcement of their greatest undertaking in the
annual address of the Useful Knowledge Society, dated June 30, 1832. A specimen of the
projected “Penny Cyclopædia” had been printed by
Mr. Clowes on the previous 2nd of June. This
fact was certified by him after a surreptitious “Penny
Cyclopædia” had been advertised in the daily papers of the 16th of August
“as now ready.” This had been met on the 17th by an advertisement
from the Committee, cautioning the public against an attempt to impose upon them. The
career of this pretender was terminated before the issue of the first number of the real
“Penny Cyclopaedia,” on the 2nd of January, 1833.
In characterizing their undertaking as “a work of such magnitude
and novelty,” the Committee appear to have looked at its magnitude, rather
with reference to the universal range of the proposed information, than to the contemplated
limits in point of size. I
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 201 |
have stated that the “Penny Cyclopædia” was projected by me
“to form a moderate-sized book of eight volumes.”* The novelty was
not to consist in producing a Cyclopædia under one alphabetical arrangement, but in its
issue in weekly sheets, each of which was to be sold at a penny. But there was another
novelty which would very soon be discovered by the educated portion of the public, upon a
comparison of this work with existing Cyclopædias. It was not an affair of scissors and
paste. It was not a hash from German and French sources. Its writers had not “been
at a great feast of languages and stolen the scraps.” Every article was to be
original; to be furnished by various men, each the best that could be found in special
departments of knowledge. The essential difficulty of making the contributions at once
brief and complete was discovered when the experiment came to be tried for a few months. It
was impossible, moreover, to offer an adequate remuneration to a competent scholar or man
of science, when it was said to him—You must give us the very cream of your knowledge; you
must pour out the fullest information in the most condensed form of words; your articles
must nevertheless be readable and perfectly intelligible to the popular mind; and yet,
under these difficult conditions, you must be paid at a certain rate per page. This
“solatium,” not low as compared with reviews and
magazine articles in reference to the mere number of words, was very low if the merit of
the Cyclopædia was to consist in extreme compression, whilst the Review and the Magazine
conductors would allow of
202 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
any amount of expansion not altogether extravagant. The plan would
never work. It would pay the gardener to grow dwarf pear trees and peach trees, but it
would not pay the writer to produce dwarfed articles that, like the rarities of the
hot-house and conservatory, should be perfect in form, if not in size, bear good fruit, and
not die very prematurely. A very clever and accomplished author, Mr. Samuel Phillips, thus described the issue of this
experiment: “When the Cyclopædia was started, the public were invited to pay their
penny a week, and to seize the opportunity of securing, not only a valuable, but also
an incomparably cheap publication. ‘Useful
knowledge’ was to be ‘diffused’ by a society appointed for the
express purpose, but it was not to be ‘diffusive.’ It was to be poured
abroad, but in such a form as should instruct, not weary or perplex the recipient. If
we remember rightly, eight good compact volumes were to contain the substantial food
for which the working mind was pining. Before one volume, however, was completed, the
Committee thought it expedient to hint that it must ‘be observed that the plan of
the Cyclopædia had been rather enlarged.’ After a year the plan had enlarged so
much that the rate of issue was doubled. It was no longer a penny a week, but twopence.
After three years it was quadrupled—fourpence a-week instead of twopence. Had the
original plan of a penny weekly issue been persevered in, it would have taken exactly
thirty-seven years to complete the business.” *
The extension of the quantity of the Cyclopædia
* “Times,” Oct. 12, 1854. |
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 203 |
was no doubt unavoidable under the superintendence of the Society,
but it destroyed its commercial value. Had it been a careful compilation, instead of an
original work furnished by nearly two hundred contributors, it would have been to me a
fortune. In that case, its preparation being confined to a few persons, its proposed limits
could have been steadily adhered to. I have recorded,—without inferring that any blame was
in the least degree to be attached to those who were responsible for its conduct—what was
the commercial result of this enterprise. “The Committee had the honour of the work,
in its extended form, but without incurring any of the risk, or contributing one shilling
to the cost, the literary expenditure alone having reached nearly 40,000l. Upon the completion of the Cyclopædia, the balance upon the outlay above the
receipts was 30,788l.”* The regular decrease in the sale was
very marked. While it continued to be published upon its original plan of one number
weekly, the sale was 75,000. The instant there was an issue of two numbers a week it fell
to 55,000, and at the end of its second year it had fallen to 44,000. When the twopence a
week became fourpence, the rate of diminution became still more rapid. The sale of the
first year was double that of the fourth year. The sale of the fourth year doubled that of
the eighth year. It then found its level, and became steady to the end—the 55,000 of the
latter months of 1833 having been reduced to 20,000 at the close of 1843. The Committee of
the Society, when the original project had been departed from, and they saw that the
under-
204 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
taking had become to me a burden and a loss, passed a resolution that
no rent be paid upon the first 110,000 copies of each number of the “Penny Cyclopædia.” Rent was then to commence; and to continue
till the work had reached a sale of 200,000, when the Society would no longer ask for a
remuneration for its superintendence. No doubt I was grateful for this sanguine
anticipation of a good time coming, but it is scarcely prudent or satisfactory for a
commercial man to postpone his profits ad Calendas
Græcas. The chronic loss for eleven years, which was induced by the
Cyclopædia, and which fell wholly upon me, absorbed every other source of profit in my
extensive business, leaving me little beyond a bare maintenance, without the hope of laying
by for the future.
There was a very serious interruption to the sale of the Cyclopædia after it had existed about six months; which
may be worth recording, as exhibiting the evils of unrepealed laws passed in former states
of society and under different circumstances. I find this record in the Minutes of the
Committee of the 12th of June, 1833: “Mr.
Knight laid on the table a letter from Mr.
Drake, of Birmingham, dated the 10th instant, which stated, that
informations had been filed, and convictions obtained, under the 27th clause of the
39th George III., chap. 79, against booksellers in that town, for selling a publication
whereof the printer’s name did not appear on the first and last pages; and that
in consequence many booksellers were fearful of selling the ‘Penny Magazine’ and ‘Cyclopædia.’” Copies of these and other letters received on
this subject were transmitted to Mr. Spring Rice, with
whom I had an interview. The
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 205 |
result was that, although a law might
eventually be passed to remedy the oppression of these qui
tam informations, the statute of the 39th George
III. could not at once be repealed. I had no remedy but to call in the whole
of the stock in the hands of many wholesale agents scattered through the country, who had
to go through the same process with those they had supplied. The law was subsequently
altered in its effect by the Government deciding that it should be left to the discretion
of the Attorney-General to prosecute publishers in all cases where the statute was not
strictly adhered to.
Mr. Phillips has said in his article on the
“Penny
Cyclopædia”—“Mr.
Knight, the publisher and prime mover of the undertaking, proudly
congratulated himself at its close upon having achieved a great literary triumph; he
had also, as was usual in his pæans, to mingle in his song the melancholy note of one
suffering under the consciousness of great commercial loss.” The melancholy
note which was out of harmony with my pæans was almost invariably connected with the
pressure of the paper duty upon all works of large circulation and low price. With the high
duty of threepence in the pound, it required a steadfast resolution on my part not to be
beaten by excessive taxation, and an equal hope that the duty might be abolished or
reduced, to prevent me throwing up the Cyclopædia in despair. In 1836 the duty was reduced
to three halfpence in the pound. This was a relief; but it was not commensurate with the
constant falling sale to which I have adverted. I gladly suspend “the melancholy
note” and turn to a much more interesting subject—the
206 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
reminiscence of some of the most valued contributors to the Cyclopædia, whose services
conferred upon it a reputation which has survived during all the varied changes of
literature and science that we have seen, and which is capable of a constant renewal of its
pristine vigour, such as has been accomplished in “The English Cyclopædia.”
The author of “The
Rehearsal” has made merry with the notion of “two kings of
Brentford sitting on one throne, smelling to one nosegay.” If Mr. Long and myself had persevered for more than a few
months in the attempt to divide the editorial duties connected with the “Penny Cyclopædia” we might possibly
have been presented to the world in this ludicrous attitude. As it was, I very soon most
gladly resigned the reins into the hands of one who managed his team with consummate skill
during many years. For such a work as the Cyclopædia a thoroughly competent Editor was
indispensable. He must combine the moral qualities of unwearied industry and undeviating
punctuality, with the firmness which is best supported by courtesy and kindness. I have
heard that a man of letters who was rather raw, laid down as a maxim for his editorial
guidance that he must be polite to his contributors, but by no means familiar.
Mr. Long’s contributors gathered round him as friends. On
his intellectual qualities it is unnecessary for me to dilate. Lord
Brougham, in his Address to the
Association for the Promotion of Social Science in 1857, referred to the
operations of the Committees of the Useful Knowledge Society as an example of “the
beneficial effects of united action.” In the “Companion to the Almanac” for 1858, I noticed, as I
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 207 |
felt it my duty to do, the somewhat exaggerated estimate which
the Chairman of the Society had formed of the results of this united action, without making
the slightest reference to individual actions. Speaking more especially of Mr.
Long’s labours as Editor of the Cyclopædia, and incidentally alluding
to my own in connection with the “Penny
Magazine” and other works, I said—“That the Society presented
many advantages as a base of operations is unquestionable. It had the prestige of great
names connected with it. Its members were of high intelligence and various learning;
they were industrious; and, what was of equal importance, they confided in their
editors. Had this confidence not existed, the periodical works could not have gone on a
single month. They would have broken down under a divided responsibility, and have been
suffocated in the red-tapeism of what Lord Brougham described as
‘a vigilant superintendence over the style, so that errors in composition and
offences against correct, and even severe, taste were sure to be
corrected,’—always provided that the editors had any reliance upon the correct,
and even severe, taste of the correctors. That ‘the great number of our
members’ produced even these minor results is a figure of speech. There were a
few working members, as there are in every association, who were valuable referees; but
that the Society, as a body, was the moving power which enabled it to publish for
twenty years ‘with unbroken regularity,’ we humbly beg to say is a
continuance of a delusion which was not entertained by those members who were content
to aid in doing what they thought a work of public utility, without attempting to shut
208 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
their eyes to what had been accomplished, during many years,
by editorial responsibility.”
In the sixth chapter, I have incidentally mentioned several of the earlier
members of the Useful Knowledge Committee as contributors to the Cyclopædia. Upon looking over the general list of the
contributors to this work during the many years of its publication, I cannot but regard it
as most fortunate that a rule, which was attempted to be established in the first stages of
the Society, soon came to be held as perfectly impracticable. This rule, to which Lord Brougham gave the name of the Self-denying Ordinance,
was in effect that no member of the Committee should be paid for his writings. It was
perhaps desirable that such a rule should have existed at the origin of the Society, when
it was considered that public subscriptions would be necessary for its maintenance. But
when it was found that during five years this source of revenue had only yielded to the
Society a clear annual sum of 125l., and that its publications might
be carried on upon the commercial principle alone, and afford a profit partly to the
Society and partly to its publishers, it would have been the extreme of false delicacy to
deny to the Editor of the Cyclopædia, especially, the services of some of the best
contributors he could anywhere find. The time was past when the highest in rank, as well as
the most eminent in literature or science, would think it a degradation to be paid for
their writings. And thus, whether members of our Committee or otherwise, every writer in
the Cyclopædia was paid at a fixed rate, whose aggregate at the end of the work had
amounted to the large sum I have previously
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 209 |
stated. Standing,
therefore, upon the same principle as regulated the pecuniary arrangements with other
contributors—the only principle upon which the relations of author and publisher can be
harmoniously maintained—I shall not attempt to separate the two classes in referring with
necessary brevity to the chief supporters of this undertaking in the character of writers.
First in importance of the great departments of the “Cyclopædia,” may be reckoned that of
mathematical and physical science. Upon Professor De
Morgan rested its heaviest labours. It was essential that one mind should
have the almost undivided charge of Mathematics, considering that, the order of the
articles being alphabetical, the relation of one portion of a subject to the other had
constantly to be regarded so as to render the whole series of articles complete and
harmonious. Thus this collection of mathematical papers, when duly arranged by their author
according to his own views, have been constantly referred to in his classes at University
College. Astronomy necessarily formed a portion of this division, and to
Professor De Morgan are due the accuracy and completeness of the
general articles on this subject. There were special papers on this branch of science by
other contributors. In speaking of the series on astronomical instruments, by the Rev. Richard Sheepshanks (who became a member of the
committee soon after the first publication of the Cyclopædia), I cannot forbear to express
the admiration I always felt for this distinguished man. There was a breadth in his
understanding which carried him beyond the range of the minute and laborious scientific
opera-
210 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
tions to which he devoted the greater part of his time. He
was a liberal thinker in political matters, although never publicly meddling with the great
questions whose triumphs he rejoiced to behold. His conversation on matters of history and
literature always presented the evidence of sound thought and rich learning. He was ready
to assist in any well-considered project of utility with a self-devotion quite untainted by
any desire of profit or distinction. The same generous spirit seems to have been a family
inheritance, for it was his brother John, who, in
1856, presented to the nation his noble collection of pictures by British artists.
Lord Brougham used to point with a just pride to the
one contribution of the Astronomer-Royal to the “Penny Cyclopædia,” as a notable example of the
value of popular literature in the eyes of one of the most eminent scientific men of his
day. Mr. Airy’s paper on Gravitation is indeed
a masterpiece of lucid exposition without the employment of mathematical formulae. Printed
in a separate shape it was long used as a text-book at Cambridge, and has been reprinted
(without alteration, as the author desired) in the “English Cyclopædia.” There are some valuable
papers on Physics, commencing with the letter D, by Robert
Murphy, one of those unfortunate men whose remarkable powers of mind have
been neutralised by the want of those moral qualities which would have preserved them from
a course of vicious indulgence. His early career presents one of the most striking examples
of self-education on record. He was born in 1806, the son of a parish clerk and shoemaker,
at Mallow, in Ireland. At eleven years of age, while learning his father’s trade,
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 211 |
he was run over by a cart, and whilst lying for twelve months on his
bed, with a fractured thighbone, was supplied by his friends with books. A Cork Almanac,
which was amongst these, contained some mathematical problems that excited his curiosity.
He desired to know more of the subject so attractive to him, and Euclid was put into his hands. In course of time the lame boy, who used to
write answers to mathematical problems which appeared in newspapers, obtained patrons who
endeavoured to take him out of his intended life of mechanical employment. They failed in
procuring his admission as a student of Trinity College, Dublin, through his deficiency in
classical acquirements, although he had received much valuable assistance in his favourite
pursuit from a schoolmaster at Mallow. At length, when he had reached the age of nineteen,
some of his papers were placed in the hands of Professor
Woodhouse, of Cambridge, who, having at first reluctantly looked at them,
was suddenly struck by such evidences of original talent, that he entered the name of
Robert Murphy on the boards of Caius College. With the exception
of a small outfit from his friends in Ireland, his expenses at Cambridge were defrayed by
the College in addition to the receipts of his scholarship. In 1829, he was elected a
Fellow of Caius. In 1832, although he had taken Deacon’s orders, he fell into
dissipated habits, and his fellowship was sequestrated for debt. His frailties were treated
with indulgence by the college authorities, and it seemed probable that he would regain his
position in the University. He came, however, to London in 1836, to look for employment as
a teacher and a writer; began the 212 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
articles on Physics in the
Cyclopædia, and subsequently wrote a treatise on Algebraic Equations for the Society.
Before his death, in March, 1843, of a pulmonary disease, “the necessity of
struggling for a livelihood made it impossible for him to give his undivided attention
to researches which, above all others, demand both peace of mind and undisturbed
leisure.”* Amongst the contributors in the general department of Physics, I
must add the name of Mr. Narrien, Professor of
Mathematics in the Royal Military College at Sandhurst. He was also our chief authority in
military science. Although the vast changes in the art of war, during the last twenty
years, have impaired the practical value of many of his articles, they formed a solid
foundation of principles, on which to build a view of the modern improvements which have
set all nations upon devising the most efficient means of attack and defence. Gunnery and
fortification, under the modern principle, may probably have the consequence of diminishing
the amount of bloodshed, in the same way as the invention of gunpowder put an end to such
battlefields of unscientific carnage as that of Agincourt.
The general articles on Physics in the “Penny Cyclopædia”—in which, as in all other
departments, occasion was invariably taken in the latter portion of the alphabet to make
mention of more recent improvements and discoveries—present the evidence of the truth,
expressed in a few words by Dr. Arnott,
“that human knowledge and art have been progressive in the world, and are now
advancing with accelerated speed.Ӡ Thus, although the papers on
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 213 |
Electricity and Magnetism dealt with a full knowledge of the theories
existing some twenty years ago, much that was then new has now become almost obsolete,
except in connection with the history of science. But more strikingly is this principle
exemplified in the large series of articles on Chemistry and Mineralogy, which were almost
wholly confided to Richard Phillips. No one more
thoroughly or more practically acquainted with the science, and more capable of furnishing
lucid expositions, could have been found. He was held in the highest respect by the
chemists of his day, as may be judged from the fact that when the Chemical Society of
London was founded, in 1841, the distinction was offered to him of becoming its first
president. He was then working at his articles in the “Penny
Cyclopædia,” as he had worked from its commencement. I had many
opportunities of familiar intercourse with this eminent man, whose simplicity of character
and manner seem to have retained something of the plainness and sincerity of that school of
pharmaceutical chemistry in which he was educated—the establishment in Plough Court of
William Allen, the Quaker. Mr.
Phillips died in his seventy-third year, in 1851, being then the curator and
chemist of the Museum of Practical Geology. In 1852, Dr.
Daubeny, president of the Chemical Society, in his annual address described
Mr. Phillips (who in 1850 had been his predecessor in that office)
as being during the latter part of his life, “a connecting link between the
chemists of the last generation and of the present, having been the contemporary of
Davy and Wollaston no less than of Faraday and Graham.”
He was further described as “one of the 214 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
last of that
distinguished band of philosophers who, before chemical science had so enlarged its
boundaries, as to include within its domain, and to comprehend within the operation of
its laws, the products of animal and vegetable life, occupied themselves almost
exclusively in the investigation of the combinations of which mineral bodies are
susceptible.” But not only had the domain of chemistry been thus greatly
enlarged, but its very language has been changed. Symbols now convey to the mind of the
student facts which previously required to be expressed in many words. Thus, valuable as
the articles of Mr. Phillips were, they demanded careful remodelling
and large additions for the “English
Cyclopædia.” In two more decades, perhaps even in one, the same process
will again have to be gone through, if that book is to preserve its reputation, and not
stereotype what has become obsolete and inapplicable to new conditions of science or social
life.
I turn to the applications of science to the arts. First in importance in
the past and in the present state of civilisation is Agriculture. I have a note before me,
dated February 25th, 1833, from the Rev. William Lewis
Rham, whom I had slightly known during my Windsor experience as the Vicar of
Winkfield, in Berkshire. He therein proposes, upon the suggestion of his friend, Mr. Jardine, to write for the “Penny Cyclopædia,” “as affording a
considerable variety of subjects, and especially those connected with agriculture, to
which I have paid some attention, and in which I have some practical
experience.” This proposition was gladly closed with; for it was not easy then to
find one of “practical experience” in agriculture who had the power of
expressing his
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 215 |
ideas in a style which should unite brevity with
clearness, and by its popular qualities turn aside the country gentleman and the cultivator
from their ordinary contempt of “book-farming.” Mr. Rham
immediately commenced that series of papers in the “Penny
Cyclopædia,” which were subsequently collected in a volume entitled
“The Dictionary of the
Farm.” He wrote the first of these articles at the beginning of 1833. He wrote
the last of the series, “Yorkshire Husbandry,” in
1843, only a few weeks before his death. During these eleven years of occasional
intercourse, I saw in Mr. Rham one of the most amiable and benevolent
of men. I visited him in his parish, where he discharged his pastoral duties with exemplary
care. But he did more than the ordinary duties of his position. The Winkfield School of
Industry, under his guidance, became a model for all similar institutions in country
parishes. There were then few examples in England of what Fellenberg was doing at Hofwyl. Mr. Rham was not
opposed, even during a period of political excitement, as Fellenberg
was opposed in 1833. But Mr. Rham did not receive in his plans for
education any great sympathy from his own class. He farmed his glebe at Winkfield. It was
here that he tried those experiments in scientific agriculture which were compatible with
the cultivation of a limited number of acres, before the era of those mechanical
improvements which have now rendered the farmer a manufacturer. But whatever could be
attained by diligent observation at home and in foreign countries, and by the study of
foreign writers on scientific husbandry, was employed as far as possible in the routine of
Mr. Rham’s own farm. Previous to writing the treatise 216 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
on Flemish Husbandry for the “Farmer’s
Series” of the Useful Knowledge Society, he walked from farm to farm in
Flanders during many weeks, enjoying the rough hospitality of a simple people, and,
speaking their language with facility, made himself agreeable to them by the variety and
extent of the knowledge which he imparted. As he returned from this tour, I met him on
board a steamer, in which I had taken my passage from Antwerp; and I have a vivid
recollection of the charm of his conversation, and the kindness of his attentions when I
was suffering from an accident which had occurred during a journey of which I shall
hereafter have occasion to speak.
Having mentioned Fellenberg’s
establishment at Hofwyl, I may assume that Mr. Rham,
whose mother was a Swiss, was well acquainted with the successful experiments in the
education of the poor which had been carried on in the Canton of Berne for thirty-two
years, when the “Penny
Cyclopædia” was first published. Mr.
Brougham, in his evidence before the Education Committee in 1818, gave a
most interesting account of Fellenberg’s School for the Poor. In
1833 Lord Brougham wrote me a letter which appears so strikingly
characteristic of his enthusiasm in the cause of education that I may venture to give a few
extracts. Its object was to put me into communication with Mr.
Duppa, of Hollingbourne House, Maidstone, who had recently returned from a
visit to Hofwyl. “The bigots and tyrants,” says Lord
Brougham, “have been prevailing so far as to get up an attack on
Mr. Fellenberg’s system (and on all sound systems of
education), and they have enlisted so much of the Swiss press on
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 217 |
their side that he considers they can only be saved by help from our own press.
Mr. Fellenberg is desirous above all that the facts should be
made known, and he has appealed to me. I feel so much interested in it that nothing but
the inconvenience of putting the Great Seal in commission prevents me from hastening to
his assistance, because if I saw with my own eyes what is doing, I know I could
speedily discomfit this vile conspiracy—which eighteen years ago nearly nipt his plan
in the bud. * * * * My belief is clear that an effort made now, and in time, by the
press, as far as the Society has access to it, would be decisive in heading back
Mr. Fellenberg’s enemies—who are chiefly the
aristocratic faction in Berne, and who never will forgive him, because, being himself a
patrician, he has chosen to lead the life of a schoolmaster for the good of
mankind.” In concluding, Lord Brougham called upon me to
do something upon this subject for the “Penny
Magazine,” during the prorogation of the Society to
which Mr. Fellenberg had appealed. Mr. Duppa sent
me an interesting account of his visit for the “Magazine,” and at the same
period wrote a full account of Hofwyl in the “Journal of Education.”
The contributions of Mr. Rham to the
“Penny Cyclopædia,”
furnished a complete view of the theory and practice of agriculture up to the time of his
death in 1843. But we were then within only a year or two of the greatest social change of
the present generation—the entire relinquishment of the system of Protection for the home
cultivator. Out of the removal of restrictions upon the importation of foreign corn and
foreign cattle, have sprung up new processes, new applications of mechanical power,
218 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
new substitutions of skilled labour for unskilled, which have lifted
the whole course of farming operations out of the routine of centuries into a systematic
study of chemistry, of meteorology, of geology, and—of what was probably most wanting in
the small acquirements of the old farmer—of Political Economy. The tentative legislation,
by which the era of Free Trade in corn was heralded, filled most agriculturists with a
shivering which preceded the great shock. A few of the wiser saw what was coming, and
called in Science for the more efficient working of their Capital. Some twenty years ago I
was travelling in a railway carriage from Hastings to Brighton, when an ancient gentleman
exclaimed, “The young ’uns will all be ruined with these new-fangled
inventions; my family have owned a farm in Sussex ever since the time of William the Conqueror, and whilst I live I will work the
land as my father worked it.” I presumed to ask him how it was that he rode
in a railway carriage, whilst his father and grandfather so often found their lumbering
conveyances stuck in the Sussex ruts as they travelled to market? The patriarch was angry,
but he could not deny that he had surrendered his free-will to a base novelty.
When the “Penny
Cyclopædia” was completed, early in 1844, we were only in the infancy of
that vast change in the intercourse of the world which has been effected by railways. The
“Cyclopædia,” as well as the “Companion to the Almanac,” kept up a systematic view of the progress of
this new method of communication, upon the ultimate benefits of which many still looked
with doubt, and some with a sort of horror at the innovation which seemed likely to alter
many of our social relations. Especially
Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 219 |
strong was the alarm, when,
in 1844, the railway companies were required to run what is now called a Parliamentary
train, at the rate of a penny a mile. It was as if the world were coming to an end, when
farm servants might, at a small cost, go daily to their work out of the bounds of their own
parish. When the advantages of this new legislation were first visible in the sight of a
smock-frock labourer whistling in the train, I wrote: “The Railway has to raise
the condition of all those who for centuries have lived remote from the nourishing
influences of our growing civilisation. Rustic innocence and rustic happiness have been
found out to be dreams of an age that never existed. The seats of ignorance are in the
villages where never mail-horn has been heard. There live the bondmen, as much bound to
the soil as the villains of the fourteenth century—bondmen without the sustenance of
bondage. The railway and the steamboat, by opening markets, by saving cost of transit,
assist the accumulation of agricultural capital That capital cannot be better employed
than in the calling forth of skilled labour. Let labour circulate, and it must become
skilled. Pen it up in hamlets, and it continues the mechanical, hopeless, dangerous
thing it is now in its uncultivated state.”*
At the period of the completion of the “Cyclopædia,” we were
very close upon the general application of the discovery of the most important instrument
of communication that the world had seen—the Electric Telegraph. The “Penny Cyclopædia” could scarcely
contemplate the wonderful ramifica-
220 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. X. |
tions of this marvellous invention. It could record that the first
line of electric telegraphs had been laid down upon the London and Blackwall Railway; and
the formation of the second line from London to West Drayton might also be referred to. How
well I remember the ignorant wonder with which, travelling from Windsor to London by the
Great Western, I looked upon the erection of tall posts at regular intervals along the
line, and, in answer to the inquiry of a foreigner as to their use, told him I thought that
they were intended for gas-lamps to light the railway. These mysterious standards were for
the application of Mr. Cooke’s patent for
insulating the wires which had been previously placed in iron tubes, buried beneath the
ground. How could we then have conceived that within twenty years there would be a map to
the United Kingdom showing the extension of the telegraph, not only to great cities and
seats of industry, but to almost every small town and to many a populous village! If this
mighty power had even been confined to our own country, and used only in connection with
individual affairs, how greatly would it have contributed to the interests of commerce and
to the happiness of domestic life. When the railway had been pressed into the service of
the new postal system, we might breakfast in London and sleep in Glasgow, after a long
day’s journey, with the certainty that we could hear from our homes by the next
afternoon. We have now that more comfortable assurance, that if any unforeseen event has
occurred, or any circumstance been forgotten that we ought to know, we shall find a
telegram on our arrival, and by the same agency our own winged words will reach our homes
in half an hour. Ch. X.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 221 |
But who in 1843 could have thought that the whole
business of journalism in this country would have been utterly changed by the Electric
Telegraph; that the Penny Morning Paper of Manchester would present the summary of a
parliamentary debate which had been closed only a few hours earlier; that the “Times,” and other journals, would offer to
their readers, at six o’clock in the morning, as complete a report of the speeches at
a midnight meeting two hundred miles away as of harangues at the same hour in Exeter Hall;
and, greatest marvel of all, that, through the application of the Submarine Telegraph,
whilst the battle of the dawn is still raging on the shores of the Baltic, the types which
are to tell us of the progress of an undecided event are being set up in the evening in a
dozen printing offices in London.
Sir George Biddell Airy (1801-1892)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he was afterwards professor of mathematics
and professor of astronomy. He was appointed Astronomer Royal in 1835.
William Allen (1770-1843)
Quaker chemist and philanthropist; he founded and edited
The
Philanthropist (1811-17).
Neil Arnott (1788-1874)
Educated at Marischal College, Aberdeen, he was a physician and Benthamite social
reformer who studied sanitation.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
William Clowes (1779-1847)
The son of a Chichester schoolmaster, he was the first printer to develop the steam
press, from 1823.
Sir William Fothergill Cooke (1806-1879)
Educated at Durham School, Edinburgh University, and on the Continent, he was an inventor
and founder of the Electric Telegraph Company in 1846.
Charles Giles Bridle Daubeny (1795-1867)
Educated at Winchester College and Magdalen College, Oxford, he was professor of
chemistry (1822-55) and botany (1834) and rural economy (1840) at Oxford.
Sir Humphry Davy, baronet (1778-1829)
English chemist and physicist, inventor of the safety lamp; in Bristol he knew Cottle,
Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey; he was president of the Royal Society (1820).
James Drake (d. 1843)
Birmingham printer and bookseller; he published the short-lived
Birmingham Magazine (1827-28).
Baldwin Francis Duppa (1801-1840)
Educated at Winchester and Brasenose College, Oxford, he was agent for the Swiss
educationist P. E. von Fellenberg and a writer on education.
Euclid (300 BC fl.)
Greek mathematician who lived in Alexandria; his
Elements forms
the basis of geometry.
Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Natural philosopher who began as an assistant to Sir Humphry Davy; he published
History of the Progress of Electro-Magnetism (1821).
Philipp Emanuel von Fellenberg (1771-1844)
Swiss educationist and reformer, author of
Vues relatives a
l’agriculture de la Suisse et aux movens de la perfectionner (1808).
Thomas Graham (d. 1822)
Scottish chemist educated at Glasgow University; he was a fellow of the Royal Society of
Edinburgh (1828) and professor of chemistry at University College, London (1837).
George Jardine (1742-1827)
He was educated at Glasgow University where he was afterwards professor of logic; his
Synopsis of Lectures on Logic and Belles Lettres was several times
republished.
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
George Long (1800-1879)
After education at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was professor of classical languages at
the University of Virginia (1824-28) and University College, London (1828-31,
1842-46).
Augustus De Morgan (1806-1871)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was a Unitarian and the first professor of
mathematics at the London University (1828).
Robert Murphy (1807-1843)
Irish-born mathematician educated at Gonville and Caius College; he was elected Fellow of
the Royal Society in 1834 before he died young of consumption.
John Narrien (1782-1860)
The son of a stonemason, he was an instructor at Sandhurst where he was made professor of
mathematics (1820).
Sir Richard Phillips (1767-1840)
London bookseller, vegetarian, and political reformer; he published
The
Monthly Magazine, originally edited by John Aikin (1747-1822). John Wolcot was a
friend and neighbor.
Samuel Phillips (1814-1854)
English journalist known for his harsh reviews in
The Times (from
1845) and the
Literary Gazette (1843-46).
William Lewis Rham (1772-1826)
Educated at Edinburgh University and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was vicar of
Winkfield, Berkshire (1808-43) and a writer on agriculture.
Thomas Spring Rice, first Baron Monteagle (1790-1866)
The son of Stephen Edward of Limerick; he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and
was MP for Limerick City (1820-32) and Cambridge borough (1832-39). He was chancellor of
the exchequer (1835-39) and contributed to the
Edinburgh
Review.
John Sheepshanks (1787-1863)
The son of a Leeds manufacturer, he amassed a collection of contemporary British art
which he donated to the South Kensington Museum. The astronomer Richard Sheepshanks was his
younger brother.
Richard Sheepshanks (1794-1855)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he took orders and was called to the bar but
retained his Cambridge fellowship while he pursued a career as an astronomer.
Edward Stanley, first Baron Monteagle (1460 c.-1523)
The son of Thomas Stanley, first earl of Derby; fighting under Thomas Howard, earl of
Surrey, he was instrumental in the English victory at Flodden Field.
William Hyde Wollaston (1766-1828)
English physician and scientist; he was senior fellow of Caius College, Cambridge
(1787-1828) and secretary of the Royal Society (1804-16).
Robert Woodhouse (1773-1827)
Educated at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge; a mathematician, he was fellow of the
Royal Society (1803) and Lucasian professor of mathematics (1820).
The Penny Magazine. 16 vols (1832-1846). Edited by Charles Knight for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.