Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter XIII
CHAPTER XIII.
WHEN I had entered upon the publication of pictorial works,
which had become a marked feature of my business, I was naturally led, as one serial
approached its completion, to look around me for its fit successor. The Bible, the History of England, were books of universal interest, in which I could carry
out my plan of rendering wood-cuts real illustrations of the text, instead of fanciful
devices—true eye-knowledge, sometimes more instructive than words. There was one large
subject capable of such treatment. It was once the fashion to illustrate Pennant’s “London” with prints of every age and character.
There could be no want of authentic materials for such a book as I contemplated.
Many descriptions of the great capital, whose past history is as
interesting as its present state, had appeared at various periods. In the age of Elizabeth, John Stow
published his “Survey of London,
conteyning the originall, antiquity, increase, moderne estate and description of that
citie.” The worthy citizen of London has been fortunate in the eulogy of
his modern editor, William J. Thoms, who to the
learning of the antiquary unites the graces of the accomplished writer. Well has he said in
his introductory notice, “If it were given to the reader to wield for a brief
space the staff of Prospero, with
Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 263 |
power to conjure up a vision of London as it existed in some
former period, there can be little doubt but that he would so employ his art that the
London of Shakspeare should stand revealed
before him. Happily, although Prospero’s
staff is broken, the conjurations of the mighty magic necessary to call up this busy
pageant were lodged in the untiring pen of honest John
Stow.” In the latter years of the Commonwealth, James Howell published his “Londinopolis; Historical Discourse and Perlustration of
London.” This is the city in which Milton had dwelt, as a boy, beneath his father’s roof in Bread
Street, to the time of his death in 1674, a blind old man. Then came laborious antiquaries
to delve amongst registers and tomb-stones, with a taste far inferior to the historians who
had gone before them. There was a field open to the light essayist; and Leigh Hunt made a very pleasant but very imperfect book of
literary gossip about authors and players. As a subject for a pictorial book of some
extent, I decided upon publishing “London” in weekly numbers. It was commenced in 1841; it was finished in
1844. I undertook the general conduct of the work. I had valuable contributors in Mr. Craik, Mr.
Saunders, Mr. Weir, Mr. Platt, Mr. Dodd,
Mr. Planché, and Mr.
Fairholt. I adopted the plan of giving the names of the authors of each
paper in a table of contents of the several volumes. The proportions in which each
contributed to a work extending to two thousand five hundred pages will thus be seen.
Instead of dwelling upon the individual merits of the contributors, I shall here very
briefly attempt to notice some of the aspects of the London of Queen Victoria, chiefly as 264 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
compared with its
characteristics during centuries of change.
I believe I may claim to have given a title to the Thames which is now
familiarly used, “The Silent Highway.” I begin the first number with one
of the most remarkable pictures of ancient manners which has been transmitted to
us—Gower’s description of Richard the Second being rowed in his stately barge, and
calling to the poet, in his little boat, to come on board amongst the great lords and
ladies of his suite. It was four hundred and fifty years ago when the minstrel and the
monarch were together,
“In Thames when it was flowing.” |
With the exception of some of the oldest portions of the Tower of London, there is
scarcely a brick or a stone that can present a memorial of the City which
Gower calls New Troy. We have to pass through the long reign of
the watermen from the time of John Norman, the first
Mayor of London, who was rowed to Westminster instead of riding, to the days when even the
watermen had become a portion of the antiquities of London—the days of the Penny Steamboat.
Equally remarkable are the contrasts between the circumstances of the times when London was
without coaches—when no sound of wheels was heard but that of the cart labouring through
the rutty ways—and those of the period when the hackney-coach, having flourished for two
hundred years, was at last annihilated by the omnibus and the cab. But a revolution was
impending, twenty years ago, whose issue no one can entirely foresee. In 1844 there were
ten railway termini in London. Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 265 |
Their contemplated union by new lines
may again change the whole system of internal communication, if the lords of the iron-way,
who ruthlessly pierce our ant-hill, should leave the ants any ground in which they may
burrow in peace.
We walk through the great thoroughfares. Where are the open shops in which,
up to the time of Queen Anne, the vendible articles were
exposed to the street without any barrier of glass? Very slow were the steps by which the
windows of small squares were superseded by the magnificent sheets of plate-glass, which,
in honour of the man who abolished the glass duties, might be called Peel’s memorial. Commercial architecture, too, has
wholly changed. The palatial buildings of London are now the city warehouses. The famous
city houses of the old nobility and the merchant princes have been long since annihilated,
with the exception of a few relics preserved for show. Not many of them remained at the
beginning of the eighteenth century. If domestic Architecture flourished little amongst us
until the days of club magnificence, neither has Sculpture done much for the adornment of
the streets of London. There is some fatality about this matter. We cannot finish the
Nelson Testimonial, which was nearly completed in
1844. We cannot add to the public statues of London—which consist of thirteen kings and
queens, four warriors, and three or four statesmen—a single monument of those, who,
dwelling within the metropolitan limits, have made our language immortal and universal—not
one of her men of science, not one of her great artists, not a Newton, not a Reynolds.
The new public buildings that have sprang up
266 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
since
the reign of George the Fourth were created rather by
some imperative necessity than by a systematic design to make them worthy of the ancient
seat of royalty and legislation, the great market of the world, and the centre of arts and
learning. Thus, if the old Houses of Parliament had not been burnt down in 1834, we should
have had no structure such as that produced by Mr.
Barry, which, with some faults, may preserve the name of the architect for
posterity, as the man who erected one grand monument in a somewhat tasteless age, even as
Wren built St. Paul’s in an age little
famous for the cultivation of high art. In 1844, the buildings were far short of
completion, but enough was done to show the general character of the edifice, and how
worthily it would some day leave not a wreck behind of the miserable facade by which
Soane deformed Westminster Hall. The present
Post Office, completed by Smirke in 1830, was an
absolute necessity for meeting that vast increase of business which could scarcely be
carried on in the old buildings of Lombard Street. Large and convenient as it is, one of
the departments—that of the Money Order—which has grown out of Penny Postage, is carried on
in a separate building. In 1845, the old Montague House, which from 1753 had been our
British Museum, was finally destroyed. The nation had desired that something larger and
nobler should be erected than the building which, for half a century, had held little more
than Sir Hans Sloane’s collection, and the
Cotton and Harleian MSS.—an edifice worthy to receive the Elgin Marbles, the Townley
Gallery, and the King’s Library. Our National Museum was commenced from the designs
of Smirke, Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 267 |
in 1823. His portico was finished in
1845. Great have been the additions and changes during another twenty years. Priceless
treasures are still crying for houseroom. What has been done is but an earnest of what
remains to do, for there can be no limit as long as England wills that she shall not be
behind other nations in securing the best trophies of civilization.
The restoration of a few of the old ecclesiastical buildings of London had
indicated, in 1844, the growth of a reverence for our beautiful monuments of ancient piety.
It is a feature, not only of an improved taste but of a higher spirit, that in this
particular, and in the general respect for antiquity, we had thrown off the shackles that
bound down the previous generation to erect structures of mere utility and to neglect most
of the beautiful things that time had spared. The restoration of St. Mary Overies was
completed about 1840, but it was with great difficulty that the exquisite Lady Chapel could
be preserved, for the despotism of London traffic insolently demanded its removal. The
genius of barbarism, in this case, was not triumphant. The restoration of the Temple Church
was accomplished without any such differences. The work was altogether in the hands of
educated men. But the revival of a taste for Gothic architecture had, in some respects, a
fatal influence upon the character of the new churches of London, as upon those that were
springing up in every diocese. They were something better than the bald specimens of
Georgian architecture, but they were to a great extent servile imitations of buildings
characteristic of another form of worship. Happily the mistakes were gradually corrected,
and it began
268 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
to be perceived that a modern Gothic church might have
some originality of adaptation, although parts had been derived from ancient examples.
The Old Spring-time in London, with its Maypoles and its Arthur’s
Show, its playing at bucklers and its maids dancing for garlands, had given place to the
chimney-sweepers; and they were fast fading into obscurity when the Legislature substituted
long brooms for climbing boys. A quarter of a century ago we were complaining that the
healthful enjoyments of the great body of the people were not sufficiently cared for in our
Parks and public walks. Happily the age of exclusiveness is passed. We form new Parks on
the East and on the South of London, amidst crowded populations, who, most of all, want
fresh air. The old aristocratic haunts are become places of recreation for the commonalty,
where they linger under the branching elms, or wander through trimly kept paths, bordered
with evergreens and summer flowers. There can be no better proof that the people are cared
for, than in the revival of fountains in the crowded thoroughfares. The conduits of the
Tudor days are gone. The toiling housewife no longer fills her pitcher at the lion’s
mouth of the sculptured column. The water-carriers are extinct. But private benevolence has
furnished the great city with the means of offering a cup of water to the thirsty
pedestrian; and now acceptable is the gift may be seen every minute.
What stranger in the metropolis, taking up his lodging in or near the great
thoroughfares, would now expect to hear any of those famous London Cries of which his
father or his grandfather used so eloquently to discourse. All the poetical cries are
Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 269 |
gone, with the exception of “Strawberries, ripe,”
which has survived since the days of Henry V.
“Cherry ripe” was married two centuries ago to poetry, which became
popular when it had gushed from the lips of Madame
Vestris. The costermonger has monopolised all the old cries of radishes,
onions, and cucumbers, but his loud voice is heard most in the suburbs. There the musical
cries still linger. Cats’-meat is proclaimed in one district by a fine tenor voice,
in remarkable contrast to the bawling of the costermonger. The tinkle of the muffin-man
remains; but we can well spare the clang of the dustman’s bell. The itinerant traders
necessarily become scarcer amidst the growth of shops in every new district. So it is with
the old street sights. Punch survives. The acrobat
occasionally spreads his carpet in a cul-de-sac, but the
raree-showman is no more. Italian boys have their white mice and their monkeys, but the
dancing bear belongs to the dim antiquity of the age of George
III. The mountebanks long survived the public-spirited artist of
Hammersmith, described by the “Spectator” with a keen relish of the impudent fellow’s wit. No Merry
Andrew now vends his nostrums in the streets. We must now take the physic without the jest.
Advertisements have superseded the harangues of the quack doctor, and thus Morrison’s
Pills and Old Parr’s Life Pills are not defrauded of their fair fame by the want of
trumpeters.
A witty friend eulogising porter exclaimed, “Always drink it out
of pewter; never drink it out of the Bills of Mortality.” The commentator
must explain what is meant by the Bills of Mortality. They were the weekly Death Registers
of a time
270 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
when the Londoners were exceedingly sensitive about any
increase in the average number of deaths, for such increase was considered as a sign that
the plague was in the crowded city, and those who could afford it fled terror-stricken.
These bills were commenced in 1592, and went regularly on until 1842. The districts in
which the parish clerks, with a band of matrons called searchers, performed the functions
of registration were “within the Bills of Mortality.” The “true
bills” of the parish clerks were necessarily imperfect, and wholly
unscientific. In January, 1840, the reports under the Registration Act were commenced, and
we are now fully able to appreciate the great impulse to sanitary reforms, which has been
given by such enlightened chronicles as those which issue from the office of the
Registrar-General. The old reports of the Bills of Mortality were connected with the system
of London burials. The horrible abuse of pestilent graveyards in the heart of the densest
population has come to an end. Ever honoured be that Committee of the House of Commons,
which, in their report of 1842, described the state of things which the Londoners had long
endured as “an instance of the most wealthy, moral, and civilised community of the
world, tolerating a practice and an abuse which has been corrected for years by nearly
all other civilised nations in every part of the globe.” The year 1844 saw
the beginning of a reformation in London, which, in twenty years, has been fully
accomplished. The example has gradually spread over the whole country. Churches and
churchyards have ceased to offend our senses and endanger our lives. “The house
appointed for all living” has become a place of decency and sometimes Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 271 |
of beauty, in accordance with the true spirit of religion, which sees
nothing odious in death.
Cobbett called the great city the Wen, and he
denounced with his utmost vigour the all-devouring maw which swallowed up the corn and
cattle raised by the labour of the country. He knew perfectly well—especially when upon his
farm of Botley he raised precocious lambs for the London market—that the wonderful
adjustment of the demand and supply was the best proof of the healthy condition of the
system of exchange under which town and country were equally thriving. Since
Cobbett wrote, what changes have been wrought in the supply of
food for London! The Corn Exchange, rebuilt in 1827, is now but an imperfect type of the
enormous transactions which mark the era of Free Trade as compared with that of Protection.
During this epoch, when the lean beasts of the Continent had come to be fattened in our
rich pastures, and the farmers of England have learnt that their profits did not wholly
depend upon the high price of wheat, the old Smithfield has vanished. Corporate
prescription long clung to its abominations. They are gone. A far more convenient
cattle-market in the northern suburb has freed our streets from the terrors of over-driven
oxen; and the time is fast approaching when beastly slaughter-houses beneath the shadow of
St. Paul’s will give place to cleanly abattoirs outside the town. Billingsgate is a
changed place. Amongst the blessings bestowed on communities by steam navigation and
railways, the rapid supply and the consequent cheapness of fish is not the least important.
It is the same with the wonderful supply of fruit and vegetables to Covent Garden. But the
material changes
272 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
in this famous market are equally remarkable. About
1830, Mr. Walker, a metropolitan magistrate, wrote:
“What must necessarily be the moral state of the numerous class constantly
exposed to the changes of the weather, amidst the mud and putridities of Covent Garden?
What ought it to be, where the occupation is amongst vegetables, fruits, and flowers,
if there were well-regulated accommodations?” The evil was not long without a
remedy. The present market is ample and convenient for all wholesale transactions. The
centre arcade, in the spring and summer season, presents a sight unsurpassed by any capital
in Europe, testifying to the perfection which the gardens and hot-houses of England have
attained since Maitland, one of the dullest of
London topographers, in describing Covent Garden as a magnificent square, says,
“wherein, to its great disgrace, is kept a herb and fruit market.”
But if the London food-markets have changed, greater is the change in the public places
where food is consumed. The old coffee-houses of the days of Addison are no longer frequented by beaux and wits. They are either
extinct, or have become common eating-houses. But something much better for human happiness
than “White’s” and “The Grecian” have sprung up in London
within the last quarter of a century. It was given in evidence before a Committee of the
House of Commons in 1840, that there were eighteen hundred coffee-shops in London where the
artizan might take his breakfast with comfort and even with luxury. John Wilson Croker, about this time, was correcting a
proof at a printing-office on the Surrey side, when he found that he wanted his breakfast.
There was no tavern or hotel near, so he boldly said he would Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 273 |
try one
of the new coffee-shops. He came back marvellously impressed with a fresh aspect of
society. He had breakfasted, for fourpence, as well as ever in his life; everything was
clean; the behaviour of the company was of the best; and he had read the “Times” of that morning, and had seen the last
Quarterly well thumbed. Mr.
Humphries, a coffee-shop keeper, told the Committee of the House of Commons
that since he had been in business a manifest improvement had taken place in the taste for
literature amongst the classes who frequented his house. But at this period there was a
marked deficiency in the London arrangements for public refreshment. There was no place,
for example, where a lady, fatigued perhaps by a railway journey, could obtain a luncheon
better than the bun and the indigestible meat-pie of the pastrycook. She could not obtain a
glass of wine unless she chose to pay for a private room at a tavern, and be charged an
extortionate price for a biscuit and a glass of sherry. The magic wand of the
Chancellor of the Exchequer has changed all this. There is
scarcely a pastrycook’s where a chop cannot be procured, and, most wonderful, the
monopoly of the inn-keeper has been destroyed, and wine for the sustentation of nature may
be sold in the smallest quantity without incurring the old penalties of the excise.
Some of the social changes of London are indicated by the altered
character of its amusements. Ranelagh disappeared in 1805. Vauxhall was still brilliant
with its variegated lamps and its fireworks not ten years ago. But the glories of the place
now abide only in the pages of Addison, and
Goldsmith, and Walpole. The Mahomedan Paradise—where Sir Roger de
274 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
Coverley heard the chorus of birds that sung upon the
trees, and looked upon the loose tribe of people who walked under their shade—had become
more genteel when Lady Caroline Petersham debarked at
Vauxhall, picked up Lord Granby very drunk, and seven
chickens were minced into a china dish, which the lady stewed over a lamp. The arcades of
Vauxhall have perished. The concert is no longer performed under the auspices of the statue
of Handel. The glee-singers now render Canterbury
Hall, and fifty other metropolitan saloons, somewhat refined amidst tobacco-smoke and
brandy-and-water. These, too, will give place to some new form of social fife, as Cremorne
has driven out Vauxhall. But the memories even of these fleeting things will survive, for
there was never an age of London in which the shifting aspects of its many-coloured life
have not been reflected by its poets and its essayists. London has sent forth its
literature through four centuries to the uttermost ends of the earth, and is full,
therefore, not only of material monuments of the past, but of the more abiding memorials
which exist in imperishable books. Thus the Tabard Inn, at Southwark, had in the reign of
Victoria become a waggoners’ yard, with its
accompanying liquor-shop and tap-room. But Chaucer’s immortal picture of “that hostelrie” and
its guests remained to us. East Cheap had lost all its ancient characteristics in the
improvements of London Bridge, but Lydgate showed us
that, long before the days of Shakspere, “There was harp, pipe, and
minstrelsy.” |
Finsbury and Islington were covered with interminable rows of houses, but Ben Jonson called to mind Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 275 |
“the archers of Finsbury, or the citizens that come a-ducking to Islington
ponds.” The Devil Tavern, with its Apollo Club, had perished, but
Jonson’s verses over the door of the Apollo Room still gave
it life. The River Fleet no longer ran across Holborn, but Pope recalled that polluted stream— “Than whom no sluice of mud With deeper sable blots the silver flood.” |
Since Pope wrote of this ditch, the sluices of mud have made the
silver flood a leaden one. The glories of “White’s,” and
“Will’s,” and “The Grecian,” and “The St.
James’s,” had passed away, in the fall of Coffee-houses and the rise of Clubs,
but we yet live in the social life of the days of Anne, and people the solitary
Coffee-houses with imaginary Swifts and
Addisons and Steeles, even
as Thackeray has called them again from the
neglected “Tatlers” and “Spectators.” The literary memorials of
London are amongst her best antiquities.
The materials for judging of the social aspects of the metropolis a
quarter of a century ago, are chiefly to be found in the Periodical Literature of that
time; as the social aspects of the century previous are to be traced in the magazines and
reviews which had started into existence in the time of George
II. Even the “Penny
Magazine,” although rarely dealing with matters of temporary interest that
belonged rather to newspapers, occasionally touched upon passing manners. The number of
December 30th, 1837, is occupied by an article entitled “London
Extremes—Hyde Park and Rag Fair.” To see Hyde Park in its full glory,
according to this writer, he would select a fine dry Sunday of the spring time. The
276 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
eye-witness arrives at Hyde Park about four o’clock; the throng
of carriages and horses seems to increase every minute, and becomes extreme about five
o’clock. “Dukes, merchants, barristers, and bankers are all intermingled;
parliament men on horseback—for Sunday is a dies
non in the senate—bow to ladies whose figures and complexion make
Frenchmen and Prussians talk with rapture of the beauties of England; tall footmen,
shining in scarlet and lace, exchange knowing looks with smart diminutive tigers, in
frock coats and top-boots, who cling behind bachelor-looking cabriolets. By-and-by an
occasional carriage may be seen to break out of the circle, and disappear by one of the
gates—for the hour of dinner draws nigh. At six o’clock there is a visible
declension in the numbers; and after that time the bustle dies rapidly away.”
When another generation shall be turning over the countless heaps of newspapers and other
weekly sheets to see what Hyde Park was in the spring of 1864, they will find that the
fashionable carriages and elegant equestrians, male and female, have vanished from this
resort on a Sunday in the season, as completely as the May-day observances, which Pepys thus preserves from oblivion in his diary of the
30th of April, 1661:—“I am sorry I am not at London to be at Hyde Park to-morrow
morning among the great gallants and ladies, which will be very fine.”
Hyde Park on a Sunday is now wholly given up to vulgar pedestrians—fashion
shuns it. It is not genteel “to take the air on a Sunday.” Fascinating
apprentices ogle smart shop-girls. Change here rules supreme. Spread over the green sward a
year or two ago were knots of people gathered round field-
Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 277 |
preachers.
As the evening closed in, the motley throng gradually cleared away. The sensible artisan
and his wearied spouse wend their way back to their dwelling “in city close
ypent,” and the well-got-up shopman, who has been airing his hack in Rotten Row,
takes the poor jade home to the stable-keeper.
“It is a long walk from Hyde Park to Rag Fair,” says
the “Penny Magazine” essayist. Such a
place as Rag Fair, at the extreme east of London, is one of its antiquities. It certainly
belongs to another condition of society. “Its glory,” continues the
“Penny Magazine,” “like that of many
other things of the olden time, waxes dim. It was otherwise when gentlemen wore huge
wigs, gold and silver-laced suits, blue or scarlet silk stockings with gold or silver
clocks; lace neckcloths; square-toed short-quartered shoes with high red heels and
small buckles; very long and formally-curled perukes, black riding-wigs, and
nightcap-wigs; small three-cornered hats, laced with gold or silver galloon, and
sometimes trimmed with feathers; and, to crown all, the never-failing sword dangling at
the heels.” It was once the rival of Monmouth Street, whose fame survives in
play and poem. To both of these marts many a faded dandy of his day, whose credit with the
tailor was broken up, and many a poor coxcomb of pretension, trying to ape his superiors in
externals, were fain to sneak. They were once a refuge for the broken-down, but not for the
destitute. Even at a more recent period, when cloth became the general material for the
coat, and velvet, silk, satin and embroidery, were reserved for court dresses, or
waistcoats and breeches only, the dearness of cloth made these places a very great
convenience to people of
278 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XIII. |
limited means. But, now, thanks to
machinery, and to that taste which has produced such a simplicity in male attire, nobody
but the very poorest need resort to Rag Fair.
In 1844, the seed that had been broadcast over the land had produced a
supply of Periodical Literature, far too great for such careful thrashing and winnowing as
may be advantageously bestowed upon the early essayists and magazine writers, in any
attempt to trace the characteristics of the age. The vast increase of this species of
publication may be attributed in some degree to the excitement, whether for purposes of
business or pleasure, that had grown out of rapid travelling, cheap postal communication,
and many other circumstances that cause the journey of life to be performed at a quicker
pace. Fragmentary reading was an inevitable result of the new condition of society. I
thought it a vast increase of this species of literature, as compared with the era of
high-priced books, when I published the following statements:—On Saturday, May the 4th,
1844, the number of weekly periodical works issued in London was about sixty. The monthly
issue of periodical literature was unequalled by any similar commercial operation in
Europe, there being two hundred and twenty-seven monthly works sent out on the last day of
May, 1844, from Paternoster Row, in addition to thirty-eight works published quarterly. To
complete this account of the commerce of the periodical press, I added the number of
newspapers published in the United Kingdom, which amounted to four hundred and forty-seven
Of these seventy-nine were London newspapers.* In the days of the newspaper stamp,
Ch. XIII.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 279 |
the number printed could be given with the utmost accuracy from the
official returns. How vast has been the increase since the total change in our fiscal laws
with regard to the press, was recently exhibited in some very curious estimates submitted
to the House of Commons by Mr. Edward Baines. It is
scarcely necessary to say that such estimates can only approximate to the truth, but they
are valuable as far as they go; and I may hope in my subsequent volume to verify them by
such inquiries as I have instituted at former periods of my working life as a publisher.
Joseph Addison (1672-1719)
English politician and man of letters, with his friend Richard Steele he edited
The Spectator (1711-12). He was the author of the tragedy
Cato (1713).
Sir Edward Baines (1800-1890)
The son of Edward Baines, editor of the
Leeds Mercury; educated at
New College, Manchester, he was a journalist, author, and reformer before being elected MP
for Leeds (1859-74).
Sir Charles Barry (1795-1860)
English architect who travelled in Greece, Turkey, and Egypt (1817-20) and won the
competition for rebuilding the Houses of Parliament (1836).
Geoffrey Chaucer (1340 c.-1400)
English Poet, the author of
The Canterbury Tales (1390 c.).
George Lillie Craik (1798-1866)
Scottish literary historian and professor of English literature and history at Queen's
College, Belfast (1849); he published
Spenser and his Poetry, 3 vols
(1845).
John Wilson Croker (1780-1857)
Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's
Life of
Johnson (1831).
George Dodd (1808-1881)
A writer of works of reference and miscellaneous literature who worked for the publisher
Charles Knight.
Frederick William Fairholt (1813-1866)
English artist, illustrator, and antiquary who worked for the publisher Charles Knight
and was from 1839 and editor for the
Art Journal.
Oliver Goldsmith (1728 c.-1774)
Irish miscellaneous writer; his works include
The Vicar of
Wakefield (1766),
The Deserted Village (1770), and
She Stoops to Conquer (1773).
John Gower (1325 c.-1408)
English poet, the author of
Confessio amantis.
George Frideric Handel (1685-1759)
German composer who settled in England in 1712 where he composed oratorios, among them
The Messiah, first produced in Dublin in 1742.
James Howell (1594 c.-1666)
Welsh Royalist historian and miscellaneous writer; his
Familiar
Letters was long reprinted.
James Henry Leigh Hunt (1784-1859)
English poet, journalist, and man of letters; editor of
The
Examiner and
The Liberal; friend of Byron, Keats, and
Shelley.
Ben Jonson (1572-1637)
English dramatist, critic, and epigrammatist, friend of William Shakespeare and John
Donne.
John Lydgate (1370 c.-1450 c.)
English poet and imitator of Chaucer; he wrote
Falls of Princes
(1430-38) and works in a variety of genres.
William Maitland (1693 c.-1757)
Scottish antiquary, author of
History of Edinburgh, from its Foundation
to the Present Time (1753).
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
Horatio Nelson, viscount Nelson (1758-1805)
Britain's naval hero who destroyed the French fleet in the Battle of the Nile (1798) and
defeated the combined French and Spanish fleets at Trafalgar (1805) in which action he was
killed.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
English scientist and president of the Royal Society; author of
Philosophae naturalis principia mathematica (1687).
John Norman (d. 1468)
London draper who was Lord Mayor in 1453, the first to travel to Westminster by boat on
Lord Mayor's Day.
Thomas Pennant (1726-1798)
English naturalist and travel writer, educated at Oriel College, Oxford; he published
British Zoology (1766).
Samuel Pepys (1633-1703)
English diarist and secretary to the admiralty; his famous diary was first discovered and
published in 1825.
James Robinson Planché (1796-1880)
Antiquary, herald, and playwright; he was manager at Vauxhall Gardens (1826-27) and the
Adelphi (1830); he wrote for the
Literary Gazette and published
History of British Costumes (1834).
John Clarke Platt (1851 fl.)
Sheffield bookseller and editor of the
Sheffield Courant; he
published
History of the Corn Laws (1842).
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Sir Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792)
English portrait-painter and writer on art; he was the first president of the Royal
Academy (1768).
John Saunders (1811-1895)
Self-educated journalist, novelist, and man of letters; an associate of Charles Knight
and William Howitt, he edited the
National Magazine (1856).
Sir Hans Sloane, baronet (1660-1753)
Born in Ireland, he was a London physician whose collection of books, manuscripts, coins,
and curiosities was given to the nation to form the nucleus of the British Library.
Sir Robert Smirke (1780-1867)
The son of the painter Robert Smirke (d. 1845), he was an English architect who studied
under Sir John Soane; his commissions included the General Post Office and the British
Museum.
Sir John Soane (1753-1837)
Professor of architecture at the Royal Academy (1806), art collector, and founder of the
Soane Museum.
Sir Richard Steele (1672-1729)
English playwright and essayist, who conducted
The Tatler, and
(with Joseph Addison)
The Spectator and
The
Guardian.
John Stow (1525 c.-1605)
An antiquary and member of the Merchant Taylors' Company, he published
The Workes of Geffrey Chaucer (1561) and
A Survey of
London (1598).
Jonathan Swift (1667-1745)
Dean of St Patrick's, Scriblerian satirist, and author of
Battle of the
Books with
Tale of a Tub (1704),
Drapier
Letters (1724),
Gulliver's Travels (1726), and
A Modest Proposal (1729).
William John Thoms (1803-1885)
English antiquary who was secretary to the Camden Society (1838-73), assistant librarian
of the House of Lords (1862), and founded
Notes and Queries
(1849).
Thomas Walker (1784-1836)
A older contemporary of Byron at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was a student of
pauperism and police magistrate at the Lambeth Street court (1829). In 1835 he published a
weekly paper called
The Original.
William Weir (1802-1858)
Educated at St Andrews and at Edinburgh University, he was a Scottish journalist who
published in the
Edinburgh Literary Journal and
Tait's Edinburgh Magazine before becoming editor of the
Glasgow
Argus in 1833.
Sir Christopher Wren (1632-1723)
He was Professor of Astronomy at Oxford (1660), the architect of St. Paul's Cathedral,
and Surveyor General (1669-1718).
The Penny Magazine. 16 vols (1832-1846). Edited by Charles Knight for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.
The Spectator. (1711-1714). Essays from the
Spectator, conducted by Addison and Steele, were
collected in five volumes and frequently reprinted.
The Tatler. (1709-11). A thrice weekly periodical conducted by Sir Richard Steele that established the format
for periodical essays used throughout the eighteenth century.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.