Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter XV
308 |
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: |
[Ch. XV. |
CHAPTER XV.
THE “Penny
Cyclopædia” was finished in twenty-seven volumes, in the spring of 1844.
The notion of a Supplement had not then been matured. The work was deemed complete, as far
as the efforts of the editor and his contributors could keep pace with the rapid march of
invention, the improvements of legislation, and the onward rush of every department of
knowledge. It is in the very nature of such works that they must be to some extent
imperfect. Not Argus with his hundred eyes could note
down all the metamorphoses of Time, the great magician, as he calls them into life.
Soon after the close of this labour of eleven years, I received an honour
upon which I look back as one of my unalloyed “Pleasures of Memory.” It comes
before me now with the vagueness of an agreeable dream. To give some precision to my
recollections, a friend transcribed for me, from the vast file of newspapers in the British
Museum, some paragraphs from those of June, 1844. I will give one from the “Athenæum” of the 15th of that month:
“Change is our order—the order of the nineteenth century; and, in marking
progress, we may record here that authors and publishers seem about to
‘handy-dandy,’—and that the contributors to the ‘Penny Cyclopædia,’ and some personal friends,
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 309 |
have given Mr. Charles Knight a sumptuous
entertainment at the Albion Tavern, on the completion of that work.” The word
“handy-dandy” may send my readers to their Shakspere:—“Change places, and handy-dandy, which is the justice,
which is the thief?” This were an unsavoury allusion to the change indicated
above; if there were any meaning intended. But perhaps the “Athenæum” had turned to Todd’s “Johnson,” and had there found this definition: “A play amongst
children, in which something is shaken between two hands, and then a guess is made in
which hand it is retained.” There was little of the material reward of
industry to be retained in my palm had it been ever so “itching;” and this my
“authors” knew. But when one individual amongst “publishers”
received such an unusual compliment as was bestowed upon me, I trust that I may regard the
circumstance in the spirit of the “Athenæum”—as
“marking progress” in the relations between two classes that were generally
considered natural enemies, but whose interests are identical and ought never to be
separated.
Upon reflection, I do not think it would be seemly in me to present my own
recollections of the circumstances attending this dinner. Nor could I faithfully do so. I
was at once joyous and frightened in my novel position. As to remembering what I said
myself, in returning thanks, it comes before me “like a tangled chain.”
One thing I recollect. I quoted from Joan of
Arc’s speech in Henry
VI.
“Glory is like a circle in the water, Which never ceaseth to enlarge itself, Till by broad spreading it disperse to nought.” |
And then I ejaculated “not so knowledge.”
310 |
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: |
[Ch. XV. |
But I must give some relation of this dinner; and I therefore blend
portions of the reports of “The Times”
and the “Morning Chronicle,”
without any deviation of phrase.
“On the suggestion of several eminent persons, it was proposed to
give an entertainment to Mr. Knight, in
celebration of the successful completion of the “Penny Cyclopædia,” and to express their sense
of the value and usefulness of the literary undertakings in which he has been engaged
as editor or publisher. Accordingly a large party met on Wednesday evening at the
Albion Tavern.
“The Chair was taken by Lord
Brougham; and amongst the company assembled were Lord Wrottesley, the Rev. Mr.
Jones the tithe commissioner, Mr. Bellenden
Ker, Mr. John Lefevre, Mr. Parkes, Professor
Key, Professor Long, Mr. M D. Hill, Mr.
Christie, M. P., Mr. Chadwick,
Mr. Porter of the Board of Trade, and a
host of literary and scientific gentlemen, as well as influential individuals connected
with the publishing world.
“Lord Brougham, in proposing
the health of Mr. Knight, dwelt on the various
services which, in connection with the Useful Knowledge Society, he had been enabled to
render towards the advancement of society in moral as well as intellectual knowledge;
pointed out especially the great service he did to the state in writing and publishing
his two little works, “The Rights of
Industry” and “The
Results of Machinery”—two publications which, at a time of great
public excitement, were eminently conducive to allaying the reckless spirit which, in
1830, was leading multitudes to destroy property and break up machines. He also pointed
out what Mr. Knight
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 311 |
had done in editing and illustrating Shakspere; in the projection and carrying on of the ‘Penny Magazine;’ and the completion of the
‘Penny
Cyclopaedia.’
“Mr. Knight’s health
was drunk with much enthusiasm, and he returned thanks in a very expressive manner,
modestly urging the greater services of Professor
Long, the editor, in the completion of the ‘Penny Cyclopædia.’ The Chairman, after
tendering apologies for the absence of Lord Denman,
Lord John Russell, and Dr. Lushington, proposed the health of
Professor Long, who duly returned thanks, and called on the
assembly to thank the contributors whose valuable aid he had received. After a few
words from Professor Key, Mr. Weir proposed the Society for the Diffusion of
Useful Knowledge, to which Lord Wrottesley
responded.
“Some excellent speeches were made during the evening, especially
one by Mr. M. D. Hill, who pointed out that the
‘Pictorial History of
England,’ projected by Mr.
Knight, had realised a long-cherished idea, that of seeing a history of
England which would make the people and the progress of national institutions a
prominent feature. To this toast Mr. Craik
responded. The Rev. Mr. Jones, who proposed the
health of Lord Brougham, was warmly applauded in
declaring that neither the Church nor religion had anything to fear from the spread of
useful knowledge, but, on the contrary, its diffusion was tributary to the highest and
best interests of mankind.”
In connection with the paragraph respecting the dinner at the Albion which
I have quoted from the “Athenæum,” was the following notice:—“We may add, as equally
significant of the change that is
312 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
coming over the spirit of the
age, that Her Majesty has been pleased to
signify, through Sir Henry Wheatley, her desire that copies of Mr. Knight’s forthcoming publications, entitled
Knight’s Weekly
Volume, should be supplied to the libraries established at all the
palaces.”
The “change that is coming over the spirit of the age”
had probably some regard to times happily long past, when literature was the toy of a king
and his courtesans, or the scorn of another crowned head who hated “Boets and
Bainters.” There was a period nearer to our own when the great were
considered the exclusive patrons of letters. Queen
Victoria upheld “the spirit of the age” in her gracious support
of a series of books professedly cheaper than any collection that had previously existed.
The undertaking had several features of novelty, and of general interest. I was proud of
the patronage of the Queen. Perhaps I was equally pleased with the encouragement I received
from a distinguished writer, with whom I had not then the happiness of that intimate
acquaintance which I have subsequently enjoyed. On the 4th of June, I received a letter
from Mr. Charles Dickens, who had seen my
Prospectus, and pronounced “the whole scheme full of the highest
interest.” He adds:—“If I can ever be of the feeblest use in advancing a
project so intimately connected with an end on which my heart is set—the liberal
education of the people—I shall be sincerely glad. All good wishes and success attend
you.”
The prospectus to which Mr. Dickens
refers was entitled “Book-Clubs for all Readers.” It
set forth that one of the first attempts, and it was a successful one, to establish a cheap
Book-Club was made by
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 313 |
Robert Burns. He had founded a Society at Tarbolton,
called the Bachelors’ Club, which met monthly for the purposes of discussion and
conversation. But this was a club without books; for the fines levied upon the members were
spent in conviviality. Having changed his residence to Mauchline, a similar club was
established there, but with one important alteration:—the fines were set apart for the
purchase of books, and the first work bought was “The Mirror,” by Henry Mackenzie.
The prospectus went on to notice that, in 1825, Mr.
Brougham, in his “Practical Observations upon the Education of the People,” had maintained
that Book-Clubs or Reading Societies might be established by small numbers of contributors,
and would require only an inconsiderable fund. He says—having mentioned a few works which
were then in existence—“I would here remark the great effect of combination upon
such plans, in making the money of individuals go far. Three-halfpence a week, laid by
in a whole family, will enable it to purchase in a year one of the cheap volumes of
which I have spoken above; and a penny a week would be sufficient, were the
publications made as cheap as possible. Now, let only a few neighbours join, say ten or
twelve, and lend each other the books bought, and it is evident that, for a price so
small as to be within the reach of the poorest labourer, all may have full as many
books in the course of the year as it is possible for them to read, even supposing that
the books bought by every one are not such as all the others desire to have.”
The publications which I proposed to make “as cheap as
possible,” would enable a family to purchase four separate books at the end
of a year by laying by a penny a week. But if twelve neighbours, or twelve
314 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
fellow-workmen, or twelve apprentices, or twelve school boys, were to
form a book-club to which each should contribute a penny a week, the association would find
itself at the end of the year in possession of fifty-two of “Knight’s Weekly Volumes,” to be preserved as a
Joint-Stock Library, or sold to the highest bidder, according to the plan of expensive
Book-Clubs.
The prospectus, in thus proposing a new element of association which
remained to be developed amongst the great body of the people—in addition to the usual
demand by individual purchasers—gave a few simple rules for the proper regulation of the
Book-Club for all Readers. My plan was to issue, at the price of one shilling, every
Saturday, a volume, which should be essentially a book, not a tract, containing as much
matter as an ordinary octavo volume of 300 pages.
The first “Weekly Volume” was published on the 29th of June,
1844. In the introduction to one of the early volumes I said: “To Miss Martineau we are deeply indebted for the ardent
zeal with which she has recommended the project of the series of books to which this
volume belongs, and for the sound judgment with which she has assisted us in arranging
the details of a plan that mainly owes its origin to her unwearied solicitude for the
good of her fellow-creatures.” I have reserved the mention in these
“Passages” of my earlier intercourse with Miss Martineau,
till I could associate her name with a period at which I, more fully than before,
comprehended the energy of her character, the fertility of her genius, and the rich variety
of her knowledge. I had become slightly acquainted with her in 1830,
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 315 |
when she was seeking a publisher for her “Illustrations of Political Economy.” The
Committee of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge were then as opposed to
works of imagination, as if they had been “budge doctors of the Stoic
fur,” whose vocation was to despise everything not of direct utility. In a year
or so, the house in which she dwelt with her mother in Westminster was frequented by crowds
of visitors of rank and talent, eager to pay their homage to the young authoress, whose
little books went forth monthly in apparently inexhaustible profusion, delighting many
readers who did not care to be instructed, and satisfying the discreet few by the soundness
of their conclusions. Previous to her voyage to America in 1835, I frequently met
Miss Martineau at the house of Mr.
Bellenden Ker. I mention this with many a vivid recollection of the charm of
her conversation. Her deafness was so neutralised by the rapidity of her perceptions, that
it almost ceased to be embarrassing to herself or her hearers. Upon her return from the
United States, she wrote several of the numbers of the “Guides to
Service,” which I was then publishing. Her power of accurate observation,
and her plain good sense, enabled her as effectively to instruct “The Maid of all
Work” in her duties, as her insight into the feelings of the young, gave her the
power of writing for me four of the prettiest volumes of children’s books in our
language, “The Play-Fellow.”
At the Easter of 1844, I went to Tynemouth, for the especial purpose of
conferring with Miss Martineau upon that series of
books which was eventually published as the “Weekly Volume.” We had corresponded much upon this interesting subject;
316 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
but as my plans were approaching maturity, I felt how
advantageous it would be for me to accept her invitation to visit her, and to avail myself
of the intervals of ease in which she could converse without injury. For she was confined
to her room, as she had been for several years, by an illness which sometimes almost forbad
the hope of recovery. But when she was free from pain and not prostrated by languor, she
could talk with animation and cheerfulness upon the subject of popular education, which
then seemed nearest her heart. I sat with her on bright mornings by the side of her sofa
under the window from which she looked out upon a green down, and, beyond, the harbour of
the Tyne and all its traffic, “the view extending from the light-houses far to the
right, to a horizon of sea to the left.” In her cheerful observation of
outward things, I had a lesson of the All-wise Goodness which compensates by so many
blessings the sufferings of humanity. There is a beautiful passage in her “Life in the Sick-Room,” which recalls
to me the state of her mind when I was thus permitted to share her confidence. She notices
how indescribably clear to her were many truths of life from her observation of the doings
of the tenants of a single row of houses: “Nothing can be more ordinary than the
modes of life which I overlook, yet am I kept wide awake in my watch by ever new
instances of the fulness of pleasure derivable from the scantiest sources; of the
vividness of emotion excitable by the most trifling incidents; of the wonderful power
pride has of pampering itself upon the most meagre food; and, above all, of the
infinite ingenuity of human love. Nothing, perhaps, has impressed me so deeply as the
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 317 |
clear view I have of almost all, if not quite the whole, of
the suffering I have witnessed being the consequence of vice or ignorance. But when my
heart has sickened at the sight, and at the thought of so much gratuitous pain, it has
grown strong again in the reflection that, if unnecessary, this misery is
temporary—that the true ground of mourning would be if the pain were not from causes
which are remediable. Then I cannot but look forward to the time when the bad training
of children,—the petulancies of neighbours—the errors of the manage—the irksome
superstitions, and the seductions of intemperance, shall all have been annihilated by
the spread of intelligence; while the mirth at the minutest jokes—the proud plucking of
nosegays—the little neighbourly gifts (less amusing hereafter, perhaps, in their
taste)—the festal observances—the disinterested and refined acts of self-sacrifice and
love, will remain as long as the human heart has mirth in it, or a human complacency
and self-respect,—as long as its essence is what it has ever been ‘but a
little lower than the angels.’”
Miss Martineau, with indefatigable zeal unabated by
illness, had written to many persons of influence to interest them in our project. Whilst
with her, I received an invitation from Mr. James
Marshall, to visit him at his house near Leeds, on my return to London. Here
I spent two very pleasant days, chiefly in earnest discussions with Mrs. Marshall (formerly the Hon. Miss Spring
Rice), on the quality of the books that were wanted for factory workers,
especially the young people. Mr. Marshall took me over that wonderful
flax-mill, where he and his brothers had recently built not only the largest room for a
318 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
manufactory, but the largest room in the world. It covered five times
as much space as Westminster Hall, extending over nearly two acres of ground. All the work
here carried on was of a cleanly character; for the coarse processes previous to that of
spinning were done out of this building. The hundreds of workers employed were chiefly
females, watching the movements of thousands of spindles, and supplying by patient
attention what the beautiful machinery could not effect without human aid. It was an
anxious time for mill-owners; for Parliament was debating whether the twelve hours of
labour in factories should be reduced to ten. This change many capitalists, even with the
most benevolent intentions, believed would be fatal to their interests, as well as so
reduce the wages of the factory workers as to cause great misery. The proposed measure was
defeated. The education clauses of the government factory bill had been previously
rejected, in accordance with the narrow views of both churchmen and dissenters. Messrs.
Marshall, and a few of the more enlightened class of mill-owners,
had not waited for the establishment of state plans of factory education. They had
excellent schools within their mill; and I attended Mrs. James
Marshall whilst she interested herself in the instruction of the classes. I
had brought with me from Miss Martineau’s a book, which had been
presented to her from some factory girls in America: “The Lowell Offering, a Repository of Original Articles; written
exclusively by females actually employed in the Mills.” The sight of the
great flax factory and its schools—the earnest solicitude of Mrs.
Marshall for the education of the children in her husband’s
employment—in- Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 319 |
duced me, upon my return home, to look carefully at
this work. Miss Martineau had told me that I should find in these
volumes some things which might be read with pleasure and information. I rather shrank from
the task, for I felt that all literary productions, and indeed all works of art, should be
judged without reference to the condition of the producer. My reluctance was soon overcome,
after I had read two or three of these papers. I then learnt that Mr. Dickens, in his “American Notes,” had mentioned that he had read
of the first volume, “four hundred good solid pages from beginning to
end,” and that the articles, putting out of sight that they had been written by
girls after the arduous labours of the day, might compare advantageously with those of many
English Annuals. I soon resolved to publish a selection from these volumes, and I entitled
the little book, “Mind amongst the
Spindles.” I wrote rather an elaborate introduction to this volume. One
portion of it was suggested by what I had seen and heard at Leeds. As the intellectual
improvement of factory workers must always be of permanent importance—and as the results of
a better education than prevailed amongst them twenty years ago have been abundantly shewn,
in the conduct and feelings of Lancashire operatives during the fearful crisis through
which they have been passing—I hesitate not to quote a passage of some extent. I said of
these Lowell girls, “During their twelve hours of daily labour, when there were
easy but automatic services to perform, waiting upon a machine—with that slight degree
of skill which no machine can ever attain—for the repair of the accidents of its
unvarying progress, they may, without a 320 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
neglect of their duty,
have been elevating their minds in the scale of being by cheerful lookings-out upon
nature, by pleasant recollections of books, by imaginary converse with the just and
wise who have lived before them, by consoling reflections upon the infinite goodness
and wisdom which regulates this world, so unintelligible without such a dependence.
These habits have given them cheerfulness and freedom amidst their uninterrupted toils.
We see no repinings against their twelve hours’ labour, for it has had its
solace. Even during the low wages of 1842, which they mention with sorrow but without
complaint, the same cultivation goes on. The ‘Lowell
Offering’ is still produced. To us of England these things ought to be
encouraging. To the immense body of our factory operatives the example of what the
girls of Lowell have done should be especially valuable. It should teach them that
their strength, as well as their happiness, lies in the cultivation of their minds. To
the employers of operatives, and to all of wealth and influence amongst us, this
example ought to manifest that a strict and diligent performance of daily duties, in
work prolonged as much as in our own factories, is no impediment to the exercise of
those faculties, and the gratification of those tastes, which, whatever the world may
have thought, can no longer be held to be limited by station. There is a contest going
on amongst us, as it is going on all over the world, between the hard imperious laws
which regulate the production of wealth, and the aspirations of benevolence for the
increase of human happiness. We do not deplore the contest; for out of it must come a
gradual subjection of the iron necessity to the holy influences of love and charity.
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 321 |
Such a period cannot, indeed, be rashly anticipated by
legislation against principles which are secondary laws of nature; but one thing,
nevertheless, is certain—that such an improvement of the operative classes, as all good
men, and we sincerely believe amongst them the great body of manufacturing capitalists,
ardently pray for and desire to labour in their several spheres to attain, will be
brought about in a parallel progression with the elevation of the operatives themselves
in mental cultivation, and consequently in moral excellence.”
The series of the “Weekly
Volume” was commenced with a book written by myself, “William Caxton, the first English Printer, a
Biography.” During the course of two years, one hundred and five volumes
were issued regularly, the weekly publication not having been omitted in a single instance.
The subjects had always been selected upon a plan which had (in the course of this time)
attained a certain completeness; and a little library having been formed, equally suited to
Book Clubs and private purchasers, it was unnecessary to continue the publication at the
rapid rate which had been previously thought desirable. The “Weekly Volume” then became the “Shilling
Volume.” In the monthly issue it was continued for two more years. I shall
have occasion briefly to refer to the series in the next epoch of my “Working
Life,” for some books of original value were comprised in it, and their writers merit
especial mention. The editorial conduct of the Series was to me a labour of love. The
success, and the reputation which it acquired, compensated me for the falling off in the
demand for the “Penny Magazine,” for
which there
322 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
were many causes; particularly the extended sale of
newspapers, and the application of wood-engravings to their illustration. To close the
story of my literary connection with the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, I
will here advert to the last days of the popular miscellany upon which I had laboured for
fourteen years.
The “Penny Magazine”
of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge terminated on the 27th of December,
1845. In 1841, after the publication of nine volumes of the original form and character, a
second series was issued, which is comprised in five volumes. I may truly say that the
object of the change was to present to a public which had been advancing in education, a
Miscellany of a higher character than the first series. The engravings were superior; the
writing was less “ramble-scramble.” There were a series of articles on the
great Italian painters, by Mrs. Jameson. During
three years the factories of London and the country were visited by Mr. Dodd and a competent artist, to provide descriptions of
all our great manufactories. Mr. Thorne wrote papers
of a topographical nature, which indicated the talent and knowledge which he would
subsequently display in “Rambles by
Rivers.” Mr. Saunders wrote a
series of clever articles on “The
Canterbury Tales.” And yet the sale fell off. The superintendence of the
Society had merged in my individual responsibility as editor when I announced a new
“Penny Magazine.” It was thenceforth to be
chiefly a magazine of reading; woodcuts no longer continuing to be the prominent feature in
the work. I took a zealous interest in this little Miscellany. In the
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 323 |
first number I republished one of Praed’s
charming Enigmas, with an illustration by Harvey. I
also then commenced a series entitled “The Caricaturist’s
Portrait Gallery.” John Wilkes, by
Hogarth; Charles
Churchill, by Hogarth; Lord
North, as the State-Coachman asleep; Burke throwing down the Dagger—these, with brief biographical notices,
constituted a novel feature, which I would recommend some weekly or monthly provider of
light literature to take up. Of Praed’s Enigmas I published
fourteen. In the desire to prevent the memory of my early friend from falling into oblivion
amongst a new generation, I gave “Some Specimens” of his writings in addition,
with a brief memoir. In 1839 this extraordinary genius died in the prime of life. He had
married in 1835. In the last American edition of his Poems we are presented with “the
following sketch of his appearance, from the pencil of N. P.
Willis, Esq.:”—“It was our good fortune, when first in
England (in 1834 or ’35), to be a guest at the same hospitable country-house for
several weeks. The party there assembled was somewhat a famous one—Miss Jane Porter, Miss
Julia Pardoe, Krazinski (the
Polish historian), Sir Gardiner Wilkinson (the
oriental traveller), venerable Lady Cork
(‘Lady Bellair’ of D’Israeli’s novel), and several persons more distinguished
in society than in literature. Praed, we believe, had not been
long married, but he was there with his wife. He was apparently about thirty-five,
tall, and of dark complexion, with a studious bend in his shoulders, and of irregular
features strongly impressed with melancholy. His manners were particularly reserved,
though as unassuming as they well could be. His 324 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
exquisitely
beautiful poem of ‘Lillian’ was among the pet treasures of the lady of the house, and we had
all been indulged with a sight of it, in a choicely bound manuscript copy,—but it was
hard to make him confess to any literary habits or standing. As a gentleman of ample
means and retired life, the kind of notice drawn upon him by the admiration of this
poem seemed distasteful. His habits were very secluded. We only saw him at table and in
the evening; and for the rest of the day he was away in the remote walks and woods of
the extensive park round the mansion, apparently more fond of solitude than of anything
else. Mr. Praed’s mind was one of wonderful readiness—rhythm
and rhyme coming to him with the flow of an improvvisatore. The ladies of the party
made the events of every day the subjects of charades, epigrams, sonnets, &c., with
the design of suggesting inspiration to his ready pen; and he was most brilliantly
complying, with treasures for each in her turn.”
It would be difficult for the most bungling limner that ever tried his
hand at “Pencilings,” to produce any sketch so unlike as this of Praed. He was not “of dark complexion;” his
features were not “strongly impressed with melancholy;” his manners were not
“particularly reserved.” To the forward American he was unquestionably cold.
The reason has been told me by one who best knew.—There was archery going on. Mrs. Praed had been lucky in hitting the mark, and
Mr. Willis offered her some extravagant
compliment, such as well-bred Englishmen are careful not to venture upon even with their
most intimate friends. From a stranger the adulation was impertinence. Mr.
Praed overheard this,
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 325 |
and accordingly took his measure
of the man with the note-book.
My brief memoir of my early friend concluded with a glance at his
parliamentary career: “The two great speakers of the Cambridge Union, Thomas Babington Macaulay and Winthrop Mackworth Praed, sat on opposite benches, when the oratory of
sport had become a stern reality. The one has fulfilled all the hopes of his youth; the
other, we can only speak of him with unbidden tears.
‘But the fair guerdon when we hope to find, And think to burst out into sudden blaze, Comes the blind Fury with the abhorred shears, And slits the thin-spun life. But not the praise.’” |
“Knight’s Penny
Magazine,” as the miscellany which commenced in January, 1846, was called,
had a short existence. In the sixth monthly part, I thus announced its discontinuance:
“The present Series of the ‘Penny
Magazine’ is closed after an experiment of only six months. The Editor
has no reason to complain of the want of public encouragement, for the sale of this
Series has exceeded that of its predecessor in 1845. But the sale, such as it is, is
scarcely remunerating; and there are indications that it may decline rather than
increase. This is a hint which cannot be mistaken. It shall not be said of his humble
efforts to continue, upon an equality with the best of his contemporaries, a
publication which once had a decided pre-eminence, that
“Superfluous lags the veteran on the stage.” |
He leaves this portion of popular literature to be cultivated by those whose new
energy may be worth 326 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
more than his old experience. The
‘Penny Magazine’ shall begin and end with
him. It shall not pass into other hands.”
Three months before I had thus put an end to my participation in the good
or the evil of the Penny Press, the Committee of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful
Knowledge announced the suspension of their operations. Their “Address,” dated
March 11, 1846, offered an explanation of their motives for this step. The circumstances
attending the publication of the “Biographical
Dictionary” had led to this determination. The Society had undertaken this
great work at its own risk. It now felt what it was to engage in a serial publication that
was not likely to be concluded during ten or more years, and to find the public support
altogether inadequate to defray its literary expenditure. A Society can do what an
individual can not dare to achieve. It could leave the battle-field. It was not so with me,
when the “Penny Cyclopædia”
was dragging me down. The Society had a charter, and might some day renew its active life:
“He that fights and runs away, May live to fight another day.” |
Had I not fought on to the end of my perilous commercial enterprise, I should have
been disgraced. Individual members of the Committee subscribed liberally to keep on their
“Biographical Dictionary,” and no one more
generously than Earl Spencer. Had his death not
occurred during the struggle to meet the loss of this bold commercial undertaking, it is
probable that the Society would not have thus sung its requiem:—
“Though the Committee always counted upon a loss, or at the best
upon a deficiency which could not be made good until long after the completion of the
work, neither they, nor others more conversant with the chances of the
bookselling-trade, were at all prepared to expect so large a deficiency as appeared by
the time the letter A was completed. On these seven half-volumes the excess of
expenditure above receipts amounts to nearly 5000l. Of this
loss, more than half, it appears, has been sustained by the Society, and the remainder
of the subscriptions and donations which have been announced from time to time. Though
the first sale of the work was encouraging, as giving some reason to hope that it would
shortly rise to such a point as might enable the Committee to proceed steadily to the
end, yet it was found that the average rate of sale of the seven half-volumes produced
the defalcation above alluded to. And careful estimates showed that, under existing
circumstances, an additional sum of at least 15,000l. must be
sunk. A work commenced in parts ought to be continued to the full extent which the
capital of the undertaker will allow. The Society has obeyed this reasonable rule, and
has exhausted its resources.”
The Committee with perfect justice turn away from the contemplation of one
failure to rejoice over a long continued success: “The Society’s work is
done, for its greatest object is achieved—fully, fairly, and permanently. The public is
supplied with cheap and good literature to an extent which the most sanguine friend of
human improvement could not in 1826, have hoped to have witnessed in twenty
years.”
328 |
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: |
[Ch. XV. |
But there was a temporary evil to counterbalance this permanent success.
All the cheap literature was not good at the period of this triumphant retrospect. This was
a circumstance that was sufficiently mortifying to those who, like myself, had formed an
over sanguine estimate of the benefit that was likely to result from the general diffusion
of the ability to read. The “Penny
Magazine” and “Chambers’s
Journal” had, in 1832, driven the greater number of noxious publications
out of the field. The great body of the people appeared satisfied with good solid food,
without any inordinate craving for stale pastry, and with an utter disrelish of offal. But
a taste for garbage, cooked up for the satisfaction of the lowest appetite, seemed to have
returned. I made no lamentation over the cheapness which had become excessive. I did not
regret that there was a competition going on in cheap weekly publications which was wholly
unprecedented. In 1846, fourteen penny and penny-halfpenny Magazines, twelve Economical and
Social Journals, and thirty-seven weekly sheets, forming separate books, were to be found
in the shops of many regular booksellers, and on the counters of all the small dealers in
periodicals that had started up throughout the country. The cheapness was accomplished in
some by pilfering from every copyright work that came in their way. There were very few of
these publications whose writers were paid for original articles upon a scale as liberal as
that of the best reviews and magazines. There were some of a character to render the
principle of cheapness dangerous and disgusting. In the concluding address of “Knight’s Penny Magazine,” I said:
“The editor
Ch. XV.] | THE SECOND EPOCH. | 329 |
rejoices that there are many in the field, and some
who have come at the eleventh hour, who deserve the wages of zealous and faithful
labourers. But there are others who are carrying out the principle of cheap weekly sheets,
to the disgrace of the system, and who appear to have got some considerable hold upon the
less-informed of the working people, and especially upon the young. There are manufactories
in London whence hundreds of reams of vile paper and printing issue weekly; where large
bodies of children are employed to arrange types, at the wages of shirt-makers, from copy
furnished by the most ignorant, at the wages of scavengers. In truth, such writers, if they
deserve the name of writers, are scavengers. All the garbage that belongs to the history of
crime and misery is raked together, to diffuse a moral miasma through the land, in the
shape of the most vulgar and brutal fiction. ‘Penny
Magazines,’ and ‘Edinburgh
Journals,’ and ‘Weekly Instructors,’ and
‘People’s Journals,’ have little chance of
circulation amongst the least-informed class, who most require sound
knowledge, while the cheap booksellers’ shops are filled with such things as
‘Newgate, a Romance,’
‘The Black Mantle, or the Murder at
the old Jewry,’ ‘The Spectre of the
Sail,’ ‘The
Love-Child,’ ‘The Feast of
Blood,’ ‘The
Convict,’ and twenty others, all of the same exciting character to the
young and ignorant. But the detrimental exercise of the printing-press is only to be met by
its wholesome employment. He has no fear for the righteous cause of cheap
literature.”
My conviction that the cheap press would purify itself was realised in
another decade. I had given a name to the wholesome literature for the people,
330 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XV. |
“The Fountain”—the noxious I had called “The
Sewer.” But I contended, as I had ever done, that the Paper Duty was an
insurmountable barrier to the diffusion of publications that should combine the qualities
of literary excellence and extreme cheapness. I maintained that to thrust out the noxious
publications, the supply of the higher class must be abundant; the quality of the writing
must be of the best, for to write well for the people is the rarest of literary
qualifications; lastly, the price must as nearly as possible approach to the cost of the
mischievous production. Whatever interferes with the circulation of the higher periodicals
by increasing their price—whatever tends to render a false economy necessary, by lowering
their payment for the best literary labour—interferes with one of the most important
instruments of National Education, using the term in its highest sense. Such were the
injurious consequences of the Paper Duty. That long disputed question has now been settled.
The total repeal of this impost took place after my commercial career was in a great degree
closed. How this tax weighed me down in the production of the “Penny Cyclopaedia,” I have related in a pamphlet of 1850, which was often
quoted in Parliament, and which has some interest as a matter of literary history. I give
the most material passage as a Note to this Chapter.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Irish politician and opposition leader in Parliament, author of
On the
Sublime and Beautiful (1757) and
Reflections on the Revolution
in France (1790).
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
Sir Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890)
Benthamite social reformer who worked on the poor laws in the 1830s and afterwards on
sewers and sanitation.
William Dougall Christie (1816-1874)
The son of the physician Dougal Christie (d. 1837); educated at Trinity College,
Cambridge, he was a Liberal MP for Weymouth (1842-47) before pursuing a career as a
diplomat and producing an edition of Dryden (1870).
Charles Churchill (1732-1764)
English satirist and libertine, a schoolmate of William Cowper; his brief but brilliant
career began with the publication of
The Rosciad (1761).
George Lillie Craik (1798-1866)
Scottish literary historian and professor of English literature and history at Queen's
College, Belfast (1849); he published
Spenser and his Poetry, 3 vols
(1845).
Thomas Denman, first baron Denman (1779-1854)
English barrister and writer for the
Monthly Review; he was MP,
solicitor-general to Queen Caroline (1820), attorney-general (1820), lord chief justice
(1832-1850). Sydney Smith commented, “Denman everybody likes.”
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
English novelist, author of
David Copperfield and
Great Expectations.
George Dodd (1808-1881)
A writer of works of reference and miscellaneous literature who worked for the publisher
Charles Knight.
William Harvey (1796-1866)
English wood-engraver who trained with Thomas Bewick; his illustrations to the
Thousand and one Nights were popular.
Matthew Davenport Hill (1792-1872)
English barrister, the brother of Sir Rowland Hill; he was MP for Hull (1833-35),
recorder of Birmingham (1839) and a reformer of criminal laws.
William Hogarth (1697-1764)
English satirical painter whose works include
The Harlot's
Progress,
The Rake's Progress, and
Marriage à la Mode.
Anna Brownell Jameson [née Murphy] (1794-1860)
Writer and art critic born in Dublin; she published
Shakespeare's
Heroines (1832). in 1825 she married the barrister Robert Sympson Jameson.
Richard Jones (1790-1855)
Educated at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, and was curate of Brasted, near
Sevenoaks, Kent (1822-33) and professor of political economy in King's College, London
(1833).
Henry Bellenden Ker (1785 c.-1871)
Son of the botanist of the same name; he was educated at Lincoln's Inn where he
befriended Henry Brougham with whom he was afterwards associated as a legal reformer. He
published in the
Edinburgh Review.
Sir John Key, first baronet (1794-1858)
A wholesale stationer, he was sheriff of London and Middlesex in 1824, lord mayor in
1830, and MP for the City, 1832-33.
Thomas Hewitt Key (1799-1875)
Educated at St John's and Trinity Colleges, Cambridge, he was mathematics professor at
the University of Virginia (1825-27) and professor of Roman language, literature, and
antiquities at University College, London (1828-42).
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
Zygmunt Krasinski (1812-1859)
Polish romantic poet, the author of
Undivine Comedy (1835), who
spent much of his life in exile.
Sir John George Shaw- Lefevre (1797-1879)
The son of Charles Shaw; educated at Eton, Trinity College, Cambridge, and the Inner
Temple, he was a barrister, civil servant, MP for Petersfield (1832-33), and founding
member of the Athenaeum Club.
George Long (1800-1879)
After education at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was professor of classical languages at
the University of Virginia (1824-28) and University College, London (1828-31,
1842-46).
Stephen Lushington (1782-1873)
Barrister, judge, and Whig MP; educated at Eton and at Christ Church, Oxford, he advised
Lady Byron on a separation from Lord Byron in 1816.
Henry Mackenzie (1745-1831)
Scottish man of letters, author of
The Man of Feeling (1770) and
editor of
The Mirror (1779-80) and
The
Lounger (1785-87).
James Garth Marshall (1802-1873)
The son of John Marshall of Headingley (d. 1845); he was a manufacturer, magistrate,
railway director, and Liberal MP for Leeds (1847-52).
Harriet Martineau (1802-1876)
English writer and reformer; she published
Illustrations of Political
Economy, 9 vols (1832-34) and
Society in America
(1837).
Julia Pardoe (1804-1862)
English novelist, biographer, and travel writer; she contributed to the
Literary Gazette.
Joseph Parkes (1796-1865)
Tutored by Samuel Parr and educated at Greenwich under Charles Burney, he was a
correspondent of Jeremy Bentham who pursued a career as an election agent and political
reformer.
George Richardson Porter (1792-1852)
Educated at Merchant Taylors' School, London, he wrote on education before becoming in
1831 superintendent of the new statistical department at the Board of Trade.
Jane Porter (1776-1850)
English novelist, sister of the poet and novelist Anna Maria Porter (1778-1832); she
wrote
The Scottish Chiefs (1810).
Helen Praed [née Bogle] (1804 c.-1863)
The daughter of George Bogle, a Glasgow merchant; in 1835 she married the poet Winthrop
Mackworth Praed.
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
John Saunders (1811-1895)
Self-educated journalist, novelist, and man of letters; an associate of Charles Knight
and William Howitt, he edited the
National Magazine (1856).
John Charles Spencer, third earl Spencer (1782-1845)
English politician, son of the second earl (d. 1834); educated at Harrow and Trinity
College, Cambridge, he was Whig MP for Northamptonshire (1806-34) and chancellor of the
exchequer and leader of the lower house under Lord Grey (1830).
James Thorne (1815-1881)
Originally an artist, he was an antiquary and topographer who wrote for
The Mirror and
Penny Magazine and contributed to
The Land we Live in, 4 vols (1847-50).
Henry John Todd (1763-1845)
English clergyman and antiquary; he edited the
Works of Milton, 6
vols (1801), and the
Works of Spenser, 8 vols (1805).
William Weir (1802-1858)
Educated at St Andrews and at Edinburgh University, he was a Scottish journalist who
published in the
Edinburgh Literary Journal and
Tait's Edinburgh Magazine before becoming editor of the
Glasgow
Argus in 1833.
Sir John Gardner Wilkinson (1797-1875)
Egyptologist, author of
Topography of Thebes and General View of
Egypt (1835) and other works.
John Wilkes (1725-1797)
English political reformer and foe of George III who was twice elected to Parliament
while imprisoned; he was the author of attacks on the Scots and the libertine
Essay on Woman.
Nathaniel Parker Willis (1806-1867)
American essayist who wrote for the
American Monthly Magazine
(1829-31); he published
Pencillings by the Way (1835).
John Wrottesley, first baron Wrottesley (1771-1841)
After education at Westminster School and military service he was a Whig MP for Lichfield
(1799-1806) and Staffordshire (1823-37); he was raised to the peerage in 1838.
The Athenaeum. London Literary and Critical
Journal. (1828-1921). The
Athenaeum was founded by James Silk Buckingham; editors
included Frederick Denison Maurice (July 1828-May 1829) John Sterling (May 1829-June 1830),
Charles Wentworth Dilke (June 1830-1846), and Thomas Kibble Hervey (1846-1853).
Chambers's Edinburgh Journal. (1832-1956). A weekly paper managed by William and Robert Chambers; Leitch Ritchie was an editor in
the 1840s and 50s.
The Mirror. 2 vols (1779-80). A periodical edited by Henry Mackenzie that was frequently reprinted.
Morning Chronicle. (1769-1862). James Perry was proprietor of this London daily newspaper from 1789-1821; among its many
notable poetical contributors were Coleridge, Southey, Lamb, Rogers, and Campbell.
The Penny Magazine. 16 vols (1832-1846). Edited by Charles Knight for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.