Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter I
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE.
The Third Epoch.
PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE.
CHAPTER I.
THE greater portion of my Second Epoch was written at Ventnor,
in the Isle of Wight. I had spent the winter there with my family, and quitted it when the
spring seemed at once passing into summer, and there was such an outburst of leaf and
blossom as I had rarely witnessed in the early days of May. What a region of beauty is the
Undercliff in all seasons. Winter rarely touches it with an icy finger. When
“yellow leaves, or none, or few” hang upon the boughs that mingle
with fallen crags, their bareness is hidden by the glossy ivy. In March it is a land of
evergreens; in June a land of “flowers of all hues.” It is scarcely a
place in which to pass “a working life;” but it is a place in which it is good
to look back upon the turmoil of such a life—its vain cares, its disappointed hopes,—and to
see what was once deemed the highest good fading into nothingness, and the instant evil
melting into a twilight in which good and evil wear the same passionless and almost
shapeless features. We unwillingly left the Undercliff, which had long been to me a spot
sacred to friendship, when the friend was a
4 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
perennial source of
delight to all who had the happiness to know him. It has become to me even more sacred, now
that he lies in the most beautiful of churchyards, that of his long-loved Bonchurch.
We moved for the summer to a very different scene, but one, to my mind,
equally attractive. I commence the story of my Third Epoch on the banks of the Thames,
above Kingston. We are the tenants of an artist, whose spacious and quaint studio where I
write is fitted by its seclusion for calling up the most abstracted memories of the Past.
The river flows rapidly beneath my window, under the shadow of lofty elms which have
flourished for a century, and by gay villas which proclaim the changes which have marked
the era of rapid communication. And yet the Present is constantly in view, in the
continuous stream of human life, which appears to move on as if it were always “a
sunshine holiday.” In the morning and afternoon happy parties in van or cart
are on their way to Hampton Court. As the sun is westering, boat after boat comes forth,
some laden with fair ones, not perhaps so fine and fashionable as in the days when
“Belinda smiled;” some
bearing the solitary youth in his outrigger, who is training for the contest of a regatta;
and, now and then, the beautiful eight-oar, rushing up the stream at a wondrous rate,
attests the worth of one of the pursuits of Eton and Oxford. Very remarkable are the
changed aspects of the Londoners’ river from Chelsea to Hampton. Rarely do I behold
the team of a dozen horses toiling along the towing-path on the shore opposite my window.
Cargoes of heavy goods travel by other modes of conveyance. Railroads carry the chief
produce of the country to the
Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 5 |
great city, and bring into the country
its sea-borne coal, its native porter, its colonial imports. Sometimes I gaze upon the
evidence of another great change. Smoke from the funnel of a steam-tug clouds the bright
atmosphere, and three or four barges are dragged leisurely along. The pair of swans that I
see leading their cygnets fearlessly out of their sheltering nook of osiers attest the
progress of change. They are here to enjoy an unpolluted river. Shakspere had “seen a swan With bootless labour swim against the tide.” |
It is not the tide which now keeps them far away from what was once the
“silver Thames” of the Blackfriars’ Stairs. I see nothing of
the commercial character of the muddy stream as it glides to the sea by the great market of
the world. But I see how it administers to the happiness of a mighty population, who, in
our time, have been permitted to enjoy, in “meads for ever crown’d with
flowers,” gardens of delight and treasures of art, which were once jealously
guarded for the exclusive use of a Court. “The heroes and the nymphs”
have passed away, for whom the old glades that William
planted after his grand Dutch fashion were exclusively held. The alleys of Kew,
“carpeted with the most verdant and close-shaven turf,” are no
longer appropriated by such as the maids of honour who hovered around Queen Caroline when Jeanie
Deans entered the private gate with the Duke of
Argyle. The pleasure grounds are no longer a sequestered region of verdure,
seldom approached by the commonalty, but in which I remember having seen, with the joyous
wonder of a school-boy, a herd of kangaroos, feeding fearlessly, with 6 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
their young leaping in and out of their pouches. These regal haunts of another age now
belong, in the happiest sense of the word, to the people.
Nearly twenty years ago, I rejoiced in a spring morning walk from Richmond
to Bushy. Yes!—I could then walk on, unfatigued by a stretch of a dozen miles. My pleasures
of the picturesque must now chiefly abide in the remembrance of scenes which float unbidden
before my mental eye. My outward vision is somewhat dim; my footsteps are feebler. Yet life
is full of enjoyment. The thoughts of my youth have not altogether passed away. The Thames
is to me now, as it was long ago, an evervarying source of gladness. I sit at my open
window, now that the second week of July has really brought a summer evening. Gradually the
sun casts long shadows of elm and poplar across the stream. The west is all a-glow. The
pleasure boats still linger beneath the green banks. The shadows deepen. The plash of the
oar becomes less frequent. A crescent moon rises in the south, and I sit watching its
course, as it throws a pencil of silver light over the rippling water, and then sinks
behind the distant woods. Many weeks of the loveliest weather succeed the passing away of
the ungenial cold of June. Never was there a more exquisite English summer. Each day is
“The bridal of the earth and sky.” |
The feelings of my early days are renewed, as I gaze upon the same stream, upon whose
green banks “Once my careless childhood play’d.” |
Much of the Romance of fifty years ago is gone; but with it were mingled some
aspirations which have not Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 7 |
been delusive. I then wrote—as the leading
idea of a Sonnet— “Spoil me not, world! but let my ripening age Cling to the green fields and the breathing grove; Not with the spell-bound votary’s sickly rage, But with a calm, severe, and reverent love, Such as my gathering woes might still assuage, And fit my soul for the bright scenes above.” |
In these my “chair days” I am not wholly unfitted for out-door
pleasures. I can take boat within a few hundred yards of my temporary retreat, and glide
down the river, “though gentle, yet not dull,” past populous places and
sequestered dwellings. The rumble of the train over the railway-bridge at Kingston disturbs
me not. The whole scene has the repose of solitude with tine gaiety of civilization. I sit
in the stern of the light but steady craft, not troubling myself even to steer. I am
molested not by the paddle of the steam-boat destroying the calm mirror of the current. That belongs to the lower regions of the Thames, and comes not now,
with its crowded deck and its brass band, above Kew. I glide on past Teddington. Past
Twickenham, whose associations with Pope are gone.
Past Ham House, which Hood has immortalized in his
exquisite verses, “The Elm
Tree.” A glimpse of Richmond Hill tells me it is time to return. But I need
not be sculled home against stream. The railway will carry me to Kingston in half an hour.
Thus with little fatigue I have an afternoon of tranquil enjoyment. A writer in a
“Review” which,—joining, with youthful vigour and more than youthful knowledge,
the old clever and honest band of Examiners and
Spectators,—has rendered weekly criticism
a thing to be respected,
8 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
and sometimes feared,—delights me, at the
time when I am renewing my familiar intercourse with my beloved Thames, by terming it
“the most beautiful river in Europe.” “Some
persons,” he says, “vainly talk of the Rhine.” He admits that
the Rhine is larger, its banks more mountainous, and has in it more water than the Thames,
but he utterly denies that it is more beautiful. “In fact, the Thames is the
incarnation of refined comforts, and contains the essence of the best of English
scenery.”*
I have recollections of the Rhine which do not in the slightest degree
interfere with my admiration of the Thames, but lead me to enjoy it the more by the force
of contrast. These recollections take me back to the point of time past, from which I have
wandered in a dreamy enjoyment of time present.
On the 27th of June, 1844, I started in company with Mr. Long on an expedition to Germany. My ostensible object,
always kept in view but very imperfectly carried out, was to hunt amongst the stores of the
German booksellers for “Folk-lore,” that might serve as material for the series
of the Weekly Volume. My companion’s
perfect acquaintance with the language promised to be of essential service to me in this
research. I was quite sure from previous experience that my friend would be as much
disposed as myself to look with cheerful aspect upon whatever we encountered, and not
render travelling that misery which sometimes ensues from the fastidiousness of those who
are not ready to accommodate themselves to foreign habits. Our steam-boat voyage to Antwerp
was accomplished in four-and-twenty
Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 9 |
hours. It is now easily performed in eighteen hours. We saw the
Cathedral and the Picture Galleries, and for the first time understood, what we could never
have learnt at home, how great a painter was Rubens.
We reached Liege late at night, having been detained long upon the railway by the imperfect
arrangements of that new mode of travelling. There was then only one line of rail from
Malines, and at one station we had to wait an hour until another train from Prussia had met
us and passed on. My late excellent friend the Chevalier Hebeler had
given us a letter or two of introduction, but we found none more valuable than a
recommendation to the host of the principal inn at Aix-la-Chapelle to provide us with his
best wine and his nicest apartments. We at length reached the Rhine, and saw the great
Cathedral at Cologne, in which the work of restoration was then going on very slowly. We
enjoyed the hospitalities of a friend at Bonn for a day or two, hearing incessant murmurs
against the Prussian government. We then joined the crowd of steamboat tourists. To many of
these the Rhine must have appeared monotonous. The real sense of the picturesque is not
very widely diffused, even now, when people have ceased to talk about “horrid
rocks,” as they did in the last century. The voyage up the Rhine was a somewhat
tedious affair twenty years ago. Some beguiled the tedium with hock and seltzer-water; some
with a book; some with a quiet nap. A friend of mine, a few years before, beheld one
ingenious traveller who had a peculiar mode of enjoying the beauties of the noble river. He
sat in the cabin hour after hour with the map of the Rhine spread out before him. Ever and
anon he called out 10 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
to the steward—“Where are we
now?” “Bacharach” “All right—here it
is”—exultingly putting his finger on the map. “Where are we
now?” “Oberwessel” “All right.” The castle
of Rhemstein did not lure him from his task, nor the vine-covered hills where Charlemagne
planted the Burgundy grape. Happy man!—as well employed perhaps as many a tourist who is
hurried along, to do this noted place and that—sees all, and sees nothing. We left the
steam-boat at St. Goar; and the next day realized what was the most delicious part of our
trip—a walk for twenty miles amidst exquisite scenery, past which the railway now whisks us
in an hour. Eighteen years later, as I glanced from the train at the White Horse at Bingen,
I longed again to stop for a day or two’s enjoyment of its abundant good cheer; but
then had I rested there I could not have climbed the Niederland and there looked upon what
Bulwer calls the noblest landscape in the world. We
were at length housed in Frankfort. The shops of the regular booksellers offered very few
serviceable things for the Weekly Volumes that could not as
readily have been procured in London; but in dirty back lanes there was an occasional shop
in which the humblest sort of popular literature—of the same character as the old chapbooks of our forefathers—was to be found. I filled a box at a
venture with some score of volumes and sheets, which appeared candidates for cheapness in
their whitey-brown paper and coarse printing and rude woodcuts. The greater number turned
out to be rubbish. Our experience at Frankfort led us to conclude that little could be
gained from an extension of our journey to the great publishing mart of Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 11 |
Leipsic, so we turned our faces homeward. This holiday trip was productive of no
commercial good, but its pleasant recollections are “a joy for ever.”
There was no lack of abundant materials for the new series, in copyrights
in which I had an interest. Some might be reprinted without alteration, others could be
adapted by their writers. Lord
Brougham’s Statesmen
of the Time of George the Third; his Dialogues on Instinct, and his edition of Paley’s Natural Theology, were of this character.
Mr. Lane’s Modern Egyptians, and Sir
John Davis’s Manners
and Customs of the Chinese, were in the same way valuable works, expensive in
their original form, now brought down to the lowest cost. Mr.
Craik, out of the extension of his chapters on Literature in the Pictorial History of England, produced
six valuable little volumes, which have since been reprinted, as they well deserve to be,
in a more costly shape for the library. One of the most original and important works in
this series was the Biographical History
of Ancient and Modern Philosophy by Mr. G. H.
Lewes. The increasing reputation of Mr. Lewes as a
writer of eminent ability and extensive acquirements was, in a great degree, founded upon
this work, which, with large improvements, has taken a permanent rank as being at once
learned and readable. In this series I included several summaries of great writers, such as
Spenser and Bacon, by Mr. Craik; Moliere and Racine, by Madame Blaz de Bury; Chaucer, by Mr. John Saunders; Hudibras, by Mr.
Ramsay. The small comparative sale of such volumes was to me a tolerably
satisfactory proof that abridgments and analyses of standard authors are not likely to be
12 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
successful. Unless important works are inaccessible from their
rarity or their bulk, the greater number of readers—and these perhaps are the more
judicious—are ill-content with hashes and essences. In my early publishing days, I
privately circulated a prospectus of “The Analytical Library of
the Great Writers, Ancient and Modern,” which thus commenced:
“One of the most valuable methods of conveying information to general readers
is partially accomplished in the Reviews which are published quarterly in this country:
we allude to the principle of taking up some standard book, to present a pretty
complete view of the subjects upon which it treats, with specimens that may convey a
notion of the matter and style of the Author. What is thus incidentally done in some of
our best critical works, we propose to carry much farther in the present
publication—much farther, indeed, than was done in the ‘Retrospective Review,’ which, like ‘The British Librarian’ of
Oldys, meritoriously adopted the principle
of reviewing our past instead of our current literature. But, instead of a
‘Review,’ we propose to publish a Library: instead of presenting a Great
Writer in an Article, we shall exhibit him in a Volume.” It was well for me that this project was not
matured into a costly series, for, if I judge rightly now, it would not have commanded a
remunerative sale. There are some works of imagination that are almost unknown to the
present race of readers. Who can avoid lamenting that Tom
Jones, and Roderick Random,
and Tristram Shandy are utterly gone
out of the popular view. But abridgments! No, no!
Amongst the original works was one which was an
Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 13 |
exception to the general character of the books in my series, which for the most part
carried the recommendation of popular names as their authors. This was “Memoirs of a Working Man.” It was
written by a tailor of the name of Carter. He was
the author of one of the little books published by Knight and Co.,
called the “Guide to Trade,”
and had been recommended to me in 1840 as a highly deserving man, carrying on a little
business for himself, with a dependent family, and struggling with the severest ill health.
In the introduction which I wrote to the “Memoirs of a Working
Man,” I stated that when the author brought to me his manuscript, which he
wished to be published by subscription, I carefully read his simple record of an uneventful
life, advised him to curtail such particulars as could only be interesting to himself and
his family, but on no account to suppress what would be interesting to all—the history of
the formation of his habits of thought, and thence of his system of conduct—the development
of his intellectual and moral life. In conclusion I said: “Upon receiving the
Manuscript thus altered and completed, I proposed to publish it in the Weekly Volume. This is the extent of my
editorial duty. I have not added, nor have I altered, a single word. The purity of its
style is one of the most remarkable characteristics of this little book.”
I desire to make a few remarks upon the question of encouraging the class
of those who are called, for want of a more definite name, working men, in attempts at
literary composition under a system of rivalry for prizes. The example of Thomas Carter, and of many others who belong to the ranks
of self-
14 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
educated men, is sufficient to prove that if they have talent
and good sense, with a reasonable proportion of knowledge, they will want no artificial
stimulus to attain some sort of success as public writers upon subjects with which they are
really acquainted. After the death of Sir Robert
Peel, there was a penny subscription for a memorial by working men to the great
minister who had carried the repeal of the Corn Laws. The late Mr. Joseph Hume, who was the treasurer of this fund, invited me to meet
some gentlemen at his house to discuss the application of the money raised. It was proposed
and was very nearly carried, that several prizes should be announced for the best memoir of
Sir Robert Peel by working men. I was almost alone in opposing the
project, but I finally got Mr. Hume to be of my opinion. The proceeds
of the subscription were ultimately placed at the disposal of the Council of University
College, and being invested by them in public securities, the interest is annually applied
to the purchase of books to be presented to one or more Mechanics’ Institutes. When I
witnessed a remarkable episode in the regular course of proceedings at the Bradford Meeting
for the Promotion of Social Science in 1859, I became more than ever convinced that the
hardy plant of uncultivated talent does not require to be transferred to a forcing-house to
bud and fructify. Lord Brougham, as President of that
meeting, was the principal performer in a great ceremony, of distributing to working men
certain prizes for original compositions proposed by Mr.
Cassell, a publisher of low-priced serials. To myself, as well as to many
others, this appeared something more than a mistake—as the promotion of a social Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 15 |
evil. The venerable President proclaimed this trading
speculation—this cheap mode of advertising—as a wonderful example of disinterested devotion
to the cause of knowledge for the people, on the part of one who might be regarded as the
great educator of his time. Palmam qui meruit
ferat. The prize system has become one of the notable expedients of
publishing quackery. The word prize is altogether a delusion. It tempts scores of
uneducated young persons to enter upon a competition for a reward for literary labours
which seems to them magnificent. They are wholly ignorant of the nature of the literary
market, in which the real prizes are ready to be earned by those who possess the requisite
qualifications. Instead of being an encouragement to struggling genius, it holds out a
temptation to mediocrity to travel out of its proper road to honour. The competition for a
prize essay, or a prize novel, is entered upon with the assured belief of scores of
self-deceivers that they can become great writers—“upon instinct.” I think it
may be of use if I here print a portion of a letter which I wrote, in 1856, in answer to a
curious application which I received from a young man of the same unqualified class of
literary aspirants as were the winners of the prizes distributed at Bradford. “Why
you apply to me for advice I know not. You want to become, in some way or other,
professionally connected with literature. You are obliged to spend your time in a
warehouse. You want to write for a periodical that you may be enabled to pursue your
studies. My advice to you is to stick to your honest calling, for you evidently labour
under some terrible mistake with regard to what you call ‘literature.’ If
you 16 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
would take the trouble to look in Johnson’s Dictionary, you would find
‘literature’ to be ‘learning, skill in letters;’ and therefore
a professor of ‘literature’ must obtain ‘learning’ and (skill
in letters by study, before he presumes to be a writer.”
The series of the Weekly
Volume, although it did not involve any considerable loss, was certainly not a
commercial success. “Why Mr. Knight did not
profit largely by the speculation, is a problem yet to be solved,” said the
writer of a paper on “Literature for the People.” The
solution was that the people did not sufficiently buy the series. There were not twenty
volumes that reached a sale of ten thousand, and the average sale was scarcely five
thousand. Considerable sums were spent upon new copyrights, and for the permission to
include in the series high-priced books, previously published by me. The volumes were not
cheap enough for the humble, who looked to mere quantity. They were too cheap for the
genteel, who were then taught to think that a cheap book must necessarily be a bad book.
Although very generally welcomed by many who were anxious for the enlightenment of the
humbler classes, the humbler classes themselves did not find in them the mental aliment for
which they hungered. They wanted fiction, and the half dozen historical novelets of the
series were not of the exciting kind which in a few years became the staple product of the
cheap press. It was perhaps as useless as it was unwise to battle against this growing
taste, which was not limited to hard-handed mechanics and their families. In 1854, when I
was inclined to think too harshly of the popular appetite for fiction, which was stimulated
by the coarsely seasoned food of such publications as
Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 17 |
the
‘London Journal.’ Mr. Dickens remonstrated with me in the most earnest and
affectionate spirit. I extract from a letter of his, marked by his accustomed good sense, a
passage which deserves the serious consideration of those who look too severely upon the
exuberance of this species of popular literature. “The English are, so far as I
know, the hardest worked people on whom the sun shines. Be content if in their wretched
intervals of leisure they read for amusement and do no worse. They are born at the oar,
and they live and die at it. Good God, what would we have of them!”
At the time of the issue of the Weekly Volume, the sale of books at railway stations was unknown. Seven years
afterwards it had become universal. Then, in the vicinity of great towns where there was a
railway station, the shelves of the newspaper vender were filled with shilling volumes
known as the ‘Parlour Library,’ ‘The Popular Library,’ ‘The Railway
Library,’ ‘The Shilling Series.’ In
their bulk of thin paper and close printing they would appear to be twice as cheap as my
volumes, but, except in very rare instances, they had involved no expense of copyright. In
1851 I wrote: “It is easy to foresee that the public, having got into the habit of
purchasing this class of books, to the great damage of the circulating libraries, will
not rest content with American piracies; and will begin to inquire whether our native
authors cannot write as well, and become as popular, as the Washington Irvings, and Pauldings, and Coopers of the
New World.” In a few years, a most remarkable development of cheapness in
books, especially in works of fiction, was accomplished without “the great damage
of the circulating libraries.”
18 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
Wonderful organizations
of the circulating library system presented a far greater encouragement to original
authorship than at the period when the few rich purchased books for their sole use. The day
of furniture books was almost past. When the circulating libraries had done their work of
“the season,” then came the cheap reprint. This was the crucial test of an
author’s popularity. My work as a publisher was finished before these times arrived,
which are certainly more favourable for publishing enterprise than those of my own
commercial experience.
Somewhat before the commencement of the Weekly Volume, I was engaged for several years in the
publication of a series of popular books which had a very large sale, but were little known
to the general reading public. They were picture books, especially adapted for sale, in the
neighbourhood of the great manufacturing towns and other populous districts, by the class
of book-hawkers known as canvassers. The books usually vended in this way, by the
persevering activity of the agents of the canvassing booksellers, had become of a somewhat
improved character, compared with those issued by the Number-publishers of twenty years
previous, of whom I have described one of the most eminent of the class.* There were four
books, forming seven volumes in folio, which I included under the generic name of
“The New Orbis Pictus,” in imitation of that work
of Comenius, which, after the lapse of two
centuries, still holds its place amongst the educational books of continental Europe. That
work, which was once amongst the most popular
* “Passages* &c.”’ Vol. I.
p. 277. |
Ch. I.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 19 |
of books, originally contained several hundred rude wood cuts with
appropriate descriptions. My series comprised the following separate books: “Pictorial Museum of Animated
Nature:” “Pictorial
Sunday-Book:” “Old
England:” “Pictorial
Gallery of Arts.” I told the public that what the Orbis Pictus had imperfectly accomplished was fully
carried out in this series, in which was accumulated the largest body of eye-knowledge that
had ever been brought together, consisting in the whole of twelve thousand engravings. To
derive the full commercial advantage of such a series of picture-books, I must have become
exclusively a canvassing publisher, with all the complex organization involved in having a
vast body of subordinate agents distributed throughout England and Scotland, who have every
facility for defrauding their principals unless watched and checked at every turn of their
operations. These books have passed into the hands of canvassing publishers proper, and
what I learn of their great and continued sale is sufficient to show me that there was a
mine of wealth requiring to be dug out by a peculiar species of industry. It is
satisfactory to me to think that these books may have presented to some portions of the
population—who without the canvassers importunity would never have expended a monthly
shilling upon literature—sources of instruction and amusement as various and extensive as
my general title implies—The Pictorial World. Of this series I was necessarily the editor.
The descriptions in each book were for the most part confided to persons of literary habits
and competent knowledge—these were, Mr. William C. L.
Martin for Natural History, Dr. Kitto
for Sacred History, Mr. Dodd for 20 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. I. |
the Useful Arts, Mr. Wornum for the Fine Arts,
and Mr. John Saunders for our National Antiquities.
I must mention, however, that the first Book of “Old
England” and part of the second, were written by myself. At the period of
its publication there was an awakening feeling for the preservation of our historical
monuments. The barbarous neglect which had permitted so many druidical remains, such as
Abury, to be in great part destroyed; so many traces of the Roman occupation to be buried;
and so many of the noble ecclesiastical edifices of the Norman era to be defaced; this
ignorant apathy was rapidly giving place to a just reverence for the past. Some of the
visits which I then made to remarkable places, for the purpose of writing or superintending
this pictorial and descriptive work on our antiquities, had been preceded by glimpses of
the same nature for other literary objects, and were followed by excursions of a similar
character for a work completed in 1849—“The
Land we Live in.” This was an important preparation for writing the
history of England. It was to me a branch of my historical education. As a rapid view of
some of the localities connected with great events, and with eminent persons, may have
interest for other historical students, I may not improperly devote a future chapter to the
recollection of occasional visits, for the gratification of more than a passing curiosity,
to sites which call up the associations that belong to the “chronicles of eld.”
Marie Pauline Rose Blaze de Bury, baroness [née Stewart] (1813-1894)
Thought to be the illegitimate daughter of Lord Brougham, she lived in Paris and
corresponded with Matthew Arnold, George Ticknor, and Lord Lytton. Among her novels was
Mildred Vernon: A Tale of Parisian Life in the Last Days of the
Monarchy, 3 vols (1849).
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
Thomas Carter (1792-1845 fl.)
London tailor (sometimes identified as John Carter) who composed an anonymous memoir
published by Charles Knight in 1845.
John Cassell (1817-1865)
London journalist and publisher who supported radical causes and published the first
English edition of
Uncle Tom's Cabin.
Geoffrey Chaucer (1340 c.-1400)
English Poet, the author of
The Canterbury Tales (1390 c.).
Johann Amós Comenius (1592-1670)
Czech educator and writer who advocated learning through objects rather than words; he
published the textbook
Orbis Pictus (1658).
James Fenimore Cooper (1789-1851)
American novelist educated at Yale College; he was author of
The Last
of the Mohicans (1826) and the other Leatherstocking Tales.
George Lillie Craik (1798-1866)
Scottish literary historian and professor of English literature and history at Queen's
College, Belfast (1849); he published
Spenser and his Poetry, 3 vols
(1845).
Sir John Francis Davis, first baronet (1795-1890)
The son of Samuel Davis, a director of the East India Company, he served with the EIC in
China and was governor and commander-in-chief of Hong Kong (1844).
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
English novelist, author of
David Copperfield and
Great Expectations.
George Dodd (1808-1881)
A writer of works of reference and miscellaneous literature who worked for the publisher
Charles Knight.
Thomas Hood (1799-1845)
English poet and humorist who wrote for the
London Magazine; he
published
Whims and Oddities (1826) and
Hood's
Magazine (1844-5).
Joseph Hume (1777-1855)
After service in India he became a radical MP for Weymouth (1812), Aberdeen (1818-30,
1842-55), Middlesex (1830-37), and Kilkenny (1837-41); he was an associate of John Cam
Hobhouse and a member of the London Greek Committee. Maria Edgeworth: “Don't like him
much; attacks all things and persons, never listens, has no judgment.”
John Kitto (1778-1827)
The son of a Plymouth stonemason; after being rendered deaf in a accident he became a
missionary and printer in the Middle East; upon returning to England in 1829 he was an
associate of Charles Knight who wrote on biblical subjects.
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
Edward William Lane (1801-1876)
Arabic scholar who travelled to Egypt in 1825 and translated the
Thousand and One Nights (1838-40).
George Henry Lewes (1817-1878)
English writer and companion of George Eliot; he wrote the standard English biography of
Goethe (1855).
George Long (1800-1879)
After education at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was professor of classical languages at
the University of Virginia (1824-28) and University College, London (1828-31,
1842-46).
William Charles Linnaeus Martin (1798-1864)
The son of the naturalist William Martin (1767–1810); he was a writer and superintendent
of the museum at the Zoological Society of London (1830-38).
Moliere (1622-1673)
French actor and playwright; author of
Tartuffe (1664) and
Le Misanthrope (1666).
William Oldys (1696-1761)
English antiquary whose anecdotes of early writers preserved much valuable information
about seventeenth-century poets.
James Kirke Paulding (1778-1860)
American writer and associate of Washington Irving; he was a member of the Board of Navy
Commissioners (1815-23) and later secretary of the Navy (1838-41).
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Jean Racine (1639-1699)
French neoclassical playwright, author of
Andromaque (1667),
Bajazet (1672),
Mithridate (1673) and Phèdre
(1677).
Alexander Ramsay (1794-1869)
Born in humble circumstances, he worked in a print shop and as a journalist before being
employed by Charles Knight as an editor. He published
Shakspere in
Germany (1866).
Sir Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640)
Flemish baroque painter and diplomat notable for his allegorical depictions of the life
of Marie de Medici.
John Saunders (1811-1895)
Self-educated journalist, novelist, and man of letters; an associate of Charles Knight
and William Howitt, he edited the
National Magazine (1856).
Edmund Spenser (1552 c.-1599)
English poet, author of
The Shepheards Calender (1579) and
The Faerie Queene (1590, 1596).
Ralph Nicholson Wornum (1812-1877)
Educated at University College, London, he was a painter and art critic who succeeded
General Thwaites as keeper of the National Gallery in 1854.
The Examiner. (1808-1881). Founded by John and Leigh Hunt, this weekly paper divided its attention between literary
matters and radical politics; William Hazlitt was among its regular contributors.
The Retrospective Review. 16 vols (1820-1828). A quarterly edited by Henry Southern (first series) and Harris Nicholas (second
series).
The Spectator. (1828-). A London weekly edited by Robert Stephen Rintoul, 1828-58.
Samuel Butler (1613-1680)
Hudibras. (London: 1663-1680). Butler's rugged satire on the Puritans was the ur-text of English burlesque poetry and
one of the more frequently-imitated poems in the language.