Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter VI
CHAPTER VI.
IT had always been with me an earnest hope that when knowledge
had been widely spread amongst all ranks of the community, it would be a fitting time to
propose the erection of some public monument to the memory of William Caxton. The English were certainly not a people given to such
demonstrations, except they were moved to this species of hero-worship by the deeds of
contemporary warriors and statesmen. The spirit of nationality had erected a monument to
Burns, but there was scarcely any other instance
of a great poet having this tribute offered to his memory, so as to arrest the attention of
the passers-by, either at the place of his birth, or in some city which he had illustrated
by his abode. We had no monument to Shakspere or to
Milton, to Bacon or Newton, in the Metropolis.
It is only within a few years that there was any memorial whatever to our greatest
interpreter of the laws of nature. It is not easy to discover what in this matter is the
essential difference between the English and the Continental character. In Paris, in the
great French cities, in Belgium, in Germany, in Holland, you are reminded at every step of
some great poet, or painter, or musician—of the greatest of those who have built up the
glory of their land in all its peaceful and civilizing processes—a glory perhaps
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 105 |
more enduring than that of the soldier and the politician. I thought
that William Caxton was a name that would provoke no controversial
opinions, and that, as he was essentially connected with the local history of Westminster,
the neighbourhood of the old Almonry, where he set up his press, would be a fitting place
for a statue to remind the population of London of what this skilful artificer had done for
them. In my little volume of “William
Caxton, a Biography,” published in 1844, the following passage refers to
the city in which our first printer was held to have learnt his art:—“Cologne
rendered the name of Caxton a bright and venerable name—a name
that even his countrymen, who are accustomed chiefly to raise columns and statues to
the warlike defenders of their country, will one day honour amongst the heroes who have
most successfully cultivated the arts of peace, and by high talent and patient labour
have rendered it impossible that mankind should not steadily advance in the acquisition
of knowledge and virtue, and in the consequent amelioration of the lot of every member
of the family of mankind at some period, present or remote.”
The anticipation which I thus expressed appeared to have a fair chance of
being realised when the Rev. H. H. Milman, then
Rector of St. Margaret’s, suggested that the improvements of Westminster should be
associated with a memorial to Caxton. This eminent
scholar and accomplished writer, in a letter to Viscount
Morpeth, said, “The character of the monument might be this—a
fountain (of living water) by day, out of which should rise a tall pillar, obelisk, or
cluster of Gothic pinnacles, for light by night; the diffusion of light being the fit
and intel-
106 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
ligible symbol for the invention of
printing.” Although it might appear invidious in me to oppose any plan for the
attainment of an object which I had advocated, I did not hesitate to sign my name to a
letter, which I addressed to the Editor of the “Times,” on the 7th of June, 1847, a few days before a public meeting was
to be held for carrying out Mr. Milman’s plan. I contended that
we required a monument for Caxton more definite than any
“symbol,” however “fit and intelligible.” A
fountain by day, a gas-light by night, were symbols of many other blessings that had been
bestowed upon mankind, to refresh and illuminate, besides the art of printing. Such symbols
might equally honour the memory of the pious and liberal Abbot who encouraged
Caxton to set up his press in the “Chapel” at
Westminster. They might equally honour any great writer whose “living
waters” and whose “light” had been rendered universal through
the press. No mixed motive of uniting a public work of utility with the memory of a great
benefactor should interfere with the performance of the duty to which we had been invited,
by the erection of such a monument as would at once tell its own story. We did not
illustrate the memory of an orator by symbols of oratory, nor of a general by trophies of
war. We wanted to show posterity what manner of man he was. The Germans had erected at
Mayence a monument to Guttenberg. It was a bronze
statue with bas-reliefs on the pedestal—not symbolical, but descriptive of his art.
On the 12th of June a large and most influential meeting was held in the
great room of the Society of Arts, “To promote the erection of a monument to
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 107 |
commemorate the introduction of printing into England, and in
honour of William Caxton.” Lord Morpeth, Chief Commissioner of the Woods and Works,
presided. The Dean of Westminster moved the first
resolution, which Mr. John Murray seconded.
Mr. Bancroft, the Resident Minister of the
United States, proposed the second resolution, which was seconded by the Rev. H. H. Milman. A Committee was formed and
subscriptions were entered into amounting to several hundred pounds. But the project fell
to the ground. Would it have been otherwise if a statue had been proposed instead of a
symbol?
The year in which the idea of a memorial to our first Printer received such
marked discouragement, afforded an opportunity for judging whether England was alive to
such manifestations of a healthy sentiment, or wholly indifferent to them in the belief
that they would not pay. The house in which Shakspere is reputed to have been born was for sale. The
old tenement at Stratford-upon-Avon, in which his father had lived, had been an object of
curiosity and reverence during many years. Our countrymen went out of their way to look at
it even in the days before railroads. Foreigners, and Americans especially, talked about it
and wrote about it. The freehold property had descended to a branch of
Shakspere’s family of the name of Hart.
At the beginning of 1847 it was announced that it was to be sold to the highest bidder.
There was a Club, which I was instrumental in forming, called “The
Museum.” It was originally contemplated to be a very cheap dining club, in the
neighbourhood of the British Museum, for the accommodation of the numerous daily students
in the Library of that Institution. The entrance and the
108 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
annual
subscription were very low. Some men of eminence in Literature and Art became members, and
younger men who had a reputation to make were welcomed. The house expenses were small; the
furniture and table services were not costly. It was a true compliment to our Club when it
got the name of “The Pewter Garrick.” Yet, though the arrangements were
upon this humble scale, I believe there was as much enjoyment in “The Museum”
as in “The Athenæum.” There was certainly more ease; and probably much more of
the “full flow of London talk” about books and men than in the carpeted
saloons of Pall Mall. At little social meetings I have heard as much wit in one evening as
would furnish the stock in trade of a fashionable diner-out for a dozen exhibitions. But of
this Club came the notion of setting on foot a subscription to buy the
Shakspere House. It was determined to call a public meeting at the
Thatched House Tavern. There were no titled names paraded to draw together a company; yet
there was a full attendance. A Committee was nominated, chiefly of Men of Letters. One
nobleman only, Lord Morpeth, was included in this
nomination. He was not a mere ornamental adjunct to a working Committee, but laboured as
strenuously as any of us to accomplish the object for which we were associated. We raised a
large subscription though it was somewhat short of the three thousand pounds for which we
obtained the property. The deficiency was subsequently made up, in some measure, by a
performance at Covent Garden Theatre, in which all the great actors and actresses of the
time took scenes from various plays of Shakspere;
and partly by the proceeds Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 109 |
of gratuitous Readings by Mr. Macready, at the time when he was leaving the stage.
The theatrical display of the 7th of December was exceedingly effective, with one
exception. I had been requested by the Committee to write a Prologue, which was to be
spoken by Mr. Phelps. He had not uttered three
lines, when a row commenced in the back benches of the pit, which had been curtailed of its
proper dimensions to form stalls. Three times the actor essayed to proceed, but the clamour
of the struggling crowd grew louder and louder; till at length he rushed off the stage, and
went to his own theatre of Sadler’s Wells, to find a more tranquil audience. I had
the satisfaction of seeing my unhappy Prologue the next morning in “The Times.” Lest my readers should throw down
my book, as Mr. Phelps threw up my poem, I will only inflict upon them
sixteen lines: Of the deyoted Thebes. Relentless hates Ask to be loos’d in bloodshed and in fire: Spare not—the conqueror cries:—yet stay! the lyre Of glorious Pindarus in Thebes was
strung— Search for his House these fated piles among; Perish the city, down with every tower, But lift no spear against the Muses’ bower. |
“The victor Time has stood on Avon’s side To doom the fall of many a home of pride; Rapine o’er Evesham’s gilded fane has strode, And gorgeous Kenilworth has paved the road: But Time has gently laid his withering hands On one frail House—the House of Shakspere stands; Centuries are gone—fallen ‘the cloud-capp’d tow’rs;’ But Shakspere’s home, his boyhood’s home, is
ours.” |
When the Shakspere House had been purchased by the
London Committee, and when the adjoining
110 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
tenements had also been
purchased by a separate subscription at Stratford, the necessity was apparent of having the
house taken care of, and shown to visitors by some one, who, at the least, would not cast
an air of ridicule over the whole thing, as was the case with the ignorant women who had
made a property of it by the receipt of shillings and sixpences. Mr. Charles Dickens organized a series of Amateur
Performances “in aid of the Fund for the endowment of a Perpetual Curatorship of
Shakspere’s House, to be always held
by some one distinguished in Literature, and more especially in Dramatic Literature;
the profits of which, it is the intention of the Shakspere House
Committee to keep entirely separate from the fund now raising for the purchase of the
House.” The announcement set forth that the Directors of General Arrangements
would be Mr. John Payne Collier, Mr. Charles Knight, and Mr.
Peter Cunningham,—the Stage-Manager, Mr. Charles
Dickens. On the 15th of May, 1848, was to be presented at the Theatre Royal,
Haymarket, the Comedy of “The Merry Wives
of Windsor” and the Farce of “Animal Magnetism.” The cast of the Comedy may
have, after the lapse of sixteen years, a far higher interest than that of a common amateur
performance.
Sir John Falstaff |
|
Mr. Mark Lemon. |
Fenton |
|
Mr. Charles Romer. |
Shallow |
|
Mr. Frederick Dickens. |
Slender |
|
Mr. John Leech. |
Mr. Ford |
|
Mr. John Forster. |
Mr. Page |
|
Mr. Frank Stone. |
Sir Hugh Evans |
|
Mr. G. H. Lewes. |
Dr. Caius |
|
Mr. Dudley Costello. |
Host of the Garter Inn |
|
Mr. Frederick Dickens. |
Bardolph |
|
Mr. Cole. |
Ch. VI.] |
THE THIRD EPOCH. |
111 |
Pistol |
|
Mr. George Cruikshank. |
Nym |
|
Mr. Augustus Dickens. |
Robin |
|
Miss Robins. |
Simple |
|
Mr. Augustus Egg. |
Rugby |
|
Mr. Eaton. |
Mrs. Ford |
|
Miss Fortescue. |
Mrs. Page |
|
Miss Kenworthy. |
Mrs. Anne Page |
|
Miss Anne Romer. |
Mrs. Quickly |
|
Mrs. Cowden Clarke. |
In the July of this year the same performances, with a few variations of
cast, were repeated at Edinburgh, and at Glasgow. Mr. Peter
Cunningham and I accompanied the troop, something in the character of the
Dutch Commissioners who went with Marlborough’s army, but not for the purpose of
fighting, or rendering any effectual assistance to the fighters. But we did not, like those
troublesome burghers in long cloaks, interfere in any degree with the regular course of our
campaign. We were invited to go, and we went solely for our own gratification. It was,
indeed, a joyous time, and I spent four or five days amidst excitements which were quite
novel to me. The receipts of the London and Provincial Performances were considerable.
There were many difficulties in the way of appointing a Curator of the Shakspere House. Lord
Morpeth had pledged himself, in his official character, that if the house
were vested in the Crown it should be preserved with religious care, as the property of the
British people, and should be maintained as the honoured residence of some dramatic author,
who should be salaried by the Government. This project, defeated by the retirement of
Lord Morpeth from office, would have been in many respects
desirable; for I may venture to inquire if there is any efficient Trust for this
112 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
property, and whether the Act of Mortmain does not interfere with
any such Trust being created? It was conveyed in fee by the vendors in 1847 to two
gentlemen. I have often asked in London and in Stratford who are the legal owners, and have
never been able to obtain a satisfactory answer. Mr.
Dickens and his friends wisely determined, therefore, to do something
efficient with the proceeds of their labours, and they bought an annuity for one of the
most able of our dramatic authors, Mr. Sheridan
Knowles.
After the theatrical trip to Scotland my intimacy with Mr. Dickens became of a closer character. Yet we rarely
met in society. At the beginning of 1850 he wrote to me “I never see you, and
begin to think we must have another Play, say in Cornwall, expressly to bring us
together.” We were soon to be brought together in a manner that I shall
always look back upon with no common pleasure. The “Household Words” was announced for publication on the
30th of March. Mr. Dickens, a week or two before the first number
appeared, sent me a brief but most cordial invitation to become a contributor: “If
you will write in my paper you will give me the utmost gratification, and be more
welcome than the flowers in May.” I could command sufficient leisure from my
business, which was then less engrossing than a few years before, willingly to lend my aid
to a publication so full of promise—so sure to become a “Fountain,” of which
all would rejoice to drink, whilst the “Sewer” would be avoided even by the
most uninstructed. Such were the names by which, in my pamphlet on the Paper Duty, just
then published, I had marked the distinction between a wholesome and a noxious cheap Weekly
Sheet. I
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 113 |
occasionally contributed some articles to the two first
volumes of this highly popular Miscellany.* In 1850 Mr. Dickens and I
were much together, especially at Broadstairs. It was in that quiet little watering-place
that he made me acquainted with the Rev. James
White. That acquaintance soon ripened into a warm friendship. Once established
in confidential intercourse with this most amiable man, it was impossible for me not to
love him. His heart was as warm as his intellect was clear. His conversational powers were
of no common order, for to the richness of a cultivated mind he brought a natural vein of
humour which in his talk, as occasionally in his writings, called forth that merriment
which is most enjoyable because it is universal in its glancing satire. And yet his
spirits, sometimes so buoyant, were occasionally overshadowed by a deep melancholy. Sorrow,
of no common amount, in the loss of children, and in his fears for others of his family,
had touched him nearly. He had a solace in the partner of his cares,—a blessing most needed
by him under the depression which perhaps is the heaviest burden men of genius occasionally
bear. Employment was his other great alleviator of trouble. He was the author of several
well-known historical dramas; and in latter years he was a diligent writer of elementary
historical works. “Landmarks of the
History of England,” and “Landmarks of the History of Greece” have
obtained a deserved reputation; their want of details is compensated by their breadth of
view. The same power of generalization is displayed in his “Eighteen Christian Centuries” In
114 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
his hospitable home at Bonchurch I always found a welcome when I was
disposed for a few days’ relaxation. I enjoyed his friendship for twelve years—and
then he, a comparatively young man, was called to his reward. His memory is held in
reverence by all amongst whom he dwelt. He was surrounded by admiring friends, who felt
that he was the great charm of their social circle. As President of the Ventnor Literary
Institute he gave a stimulus, as only such a man can give, to the intellectual pursuits of
a mixed population. His “Landmarks” of our own history were originally
delivered as lectures to his neighbours. They are models of what such discourses ought to
be—simple in their style; abounding in knowledge without pedantry; liberal and patriotic.
At the end of March, 1851, I received a note from Mr. Dickens which summoned me to a new vocation:
“Jerrold tells me that you will do
Hodge, the Country Servant, in Bulwer’s comedy.” This comedy,
“Not so bad as we seem,”
was to attain a wide notoriety in connexion with the performances of “The Amateur
Company of the Guild of Literature and Art.” The notion of forming a Guild of this
character had for its object “To encourage Life Assurance and other Provident
habits among Authors and Artists; to render such assistance to both as shall never
compromise their independence; and to found a new Institution where honourable rest
from arduous labour shall still be associated with the discharge of congenial
duties.” The plan was matured at Sir Edward Bulwer
Lytton’s seat of Knebworth, in Hertfordshire, in November 1850, when
there was an amateur performance of “Every
Man in his Humour,” under the management of Mr.
Dickens. I was favoured
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 115 |
with an invitation for one of
three evenings. At the supper of the Amateurs after the last performance, it was announced
that our host had signified his intention of presenting a piece of land, being a part of
his estate, upon which might be erected commodious dwellings for the Members of the New
Institution who should be elected to this “honourable rest from arduous
labour.” Performances of a more public character than those of Knebworth were
to be undertaken. Mr. Dickens, with his usual energy, set about their
organization. The new comedy was written; the characters were cast. For myself, I should
have been well contented with “Hodge, the
Country Servant.” But my professional tastes, and consequent histrionic
capacity for playing the part of a scheming publisher of the days of Sir Robert Walpole, were considered; and I had to rehearse
the part of “Mr. Jacob Tonson, a
Bookseller.” “Left-legged Jacob,” I fear,
had a halting representative.
The Amateur Company of the Guild, as originally constituted, was as
follows;—taken in the order in which they appear in the announcements of the performances:
Frank Stone; Dudley
Costello; Charles Dickens; Douglas Jerrold; John
Forster; Mark Lemon; F. W. Topham; Peter
Cunningham; Westland Marston;
R. H. Horne; Charles
Knight; Wilkie Collins; John Tenniel; Robert
Bell; Augustus Egg. The ladies were
professional.
All the tedious process of rehearsals at Miss
Kelly’s theatre were over. The dresses were made and fitted. A little
moveable theatre was constructed—a perfect miniature stage, with every requisite of the
property-man. The scenery was of no common character. Two Royal Academicians, Mr. Stanfield and Mr.
116 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
Roberts, had produced little marvels of scenic art.
Mr. Grieve, and four others of the most eminent
professors of this really high branch of pictorial effect, had painted interiors and street
representations which were perfect illustrations of the story. Everything was ready for
presenting “Not so bad as we
seem” upon a site to which the car of Thespis had never before travelled. The Duke of
Devonshire gave up his mansion in Piccadilly to our use. The moveable
theatre was put up in the great drawing-room. We had his library for our green-room. The
Duke took a warm interest in all our proceedings, and it is scarcely necessary to say that
his hospitality was most liberal. A dress-rehearsal took place on the 6th of May, at which
our families, and many literary men and artists were present, as well as immediate friends
of our host. At the first performance at Devonshire House, on the 14th of May, the
Queen was present. The actors and the audience
were so close together that as Mr. Jacob Tonson sat
in Wills’ Coffee-house he could have touched with his clouded cane the Duke of Wellington, who was of her Majesty’s suite.
The representations at Devonshire House were followed by others of a less
courtly character at the Hanover Square Rooms. The town was excessively full, for it was
the time of the Great Exhibition. We were getting rather weary of our monotonous duties on
the hot nights of June and July, when they came to a close. The success of these
performances was as much due to the remarkable powers of organization possessed by
Mr. Dickens, as to the merits of the Comedy, and
the desire of the actors to acquit themselves creditably in their several cha-
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 117 |
racters. Though it must be confessed the dialogue of the play was
occasionally heavy, and the incidents not very striking, the applause of the audience was
quite sufficient to have satisfied even the professional player. There was a wonderful
farce, however, “Mr. Nightingale’s
Diary,” written by Mr. Dickens and Mr. Mark Lemon, in which Mr.
Gabblewig (Dickens) personated five or six different
characters, changing his dress, and altering his features, his voice, and his gait with an
effect that was worthy of the elder or the younger Mathews. I have mentioned Mr.
Dickens’s singular ability as a manager. It is perhaps not so
remarkable a quality as the presence of mind, and power of will, which he displayed at one
of the performances at Hanover Square. A part of the scenic drapery of the stage caught
fire. The audience jumped up, and were rushing to the one door of egress, to encounter even
a greater danger than that of a burning stage. Mr. Dickens, who was
acting at the time, immediately rushed to the footlights, and his voice of command made
itself heard through the whole building—“Sit still, every one of you!”
The five hundred terrified spectators did sit still. The self-possessed actor went on with
his part, as if nothing had happened, leaving to others to put out the blaze. It was
quickly put out; and we all felt, when we looked upon the resumed tranquillity of those who
might have been treading each other under foot, what an invaluable possession was decision
of character.
The success in London of the Amateur Performances of the Guild led to the
determination of the Company to venture upon some experiments with provincial audiences.
Our theatre was so constructed
118 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
as to be packed and placed upon a
railway-carriage. Our first excursion was to Bath and to Bristol, in November. The stage
was put up in the Assembly-rooms at Bath. We were at our post, ready to dress, when our
perruquier, with a look of horror, announced that the wigs had not arrived. The
hairdressers’ shops were ransacked in vain; the time was long passed when Bath could
produce a stock of perukes such as were the glory of the days of Nash, much less of the first years of the Brunswick dynasty. It was a
question whether our Duke of Middlesex, our
Earl of Loftus, and our Lord
Wilmot, could be content with the scratch-wigs of our own degenerate days,
or appear in their gorgeous array of velvet and lace with their own cropped hair. We really
dreaded for our poor perruquier some such catastrophe as happened to the cook of Louis the Fourteenth, when the fish came too late for dinner.
But the fates were propitious. The wigs arrived at the last moment. The Bath audience, too
genteel to manifest emotion, gave us very faint, if any, applause. We looked forward to the
time when we should receive our deserts at the hands of the sturdier critics and the more
youthful and sympathising fair of the North. We were compensated, however, by the audience
in the Assembly-rooms at Clifton, where Bristol commerce and its suburban gentility vied
with each other in making us welcome. In the February of the next year the Amateur Company
had two performances at Manchester, and two at Liverpool. We felt it necessary on several
occasions to decline the private and public hospitalities that were offered to us; but at
Liverpool we considered ourselves bound to accept the invitation of the Mayor to dine at
the Mansion-house. Mr. Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 119 |
Littledale, who was then Chief Magistrate, was an
object of public admiration from the noble effort he had a little before made to save the
crew of a sinking vessel. He was rewarded in being the instrument of preserving many lives
as he was cruising in his yacht. On the occasion of our entertainment his brother members
of the Yacht Club were also invited. I have not been much of a diner at the civic banquets
of London; perhaps I may be somewhat fastidious, or speaking from imperfect knowledge, when
I say that the hospitalities of the City appeared to me greatly inferior to the refinement
of Liverpool, and the Mansion-house of London a tawdry affair compared with the elegant
suite of rooms in which every stranger of note who comes to the great Port of the Mersey is
sure to be welcomed at the weekly dinner, which is not chiefly confined to aldermen and
common-councilmen.
We visited Shrewsbury and Birmingham in the summer of 1852, before setting
out upon our principal circuit at the end of August and beginning of September. We first
went to Nottingham, and then to Derby. At Newcastle, the room in which we performed was
small and inconvenient, and the consequent crush somewhat alarming. But at Sunderland,
where the Guild was to perform on the 28th of August, there was an alarm of a more serious
character. We had arrived there from Newcastle in the middle of the day, and found that
Dickens, who had started early to walk, was
busied at the Musical Hall making the necessary arrangements. It had been recently erected;
had never been used; and was in some parts not completely finished. Our manager was a long
while absent, but at length he
120 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. VI. |
came to the Inn, looking jaded and
anxious, and, what was very unusual, depressed in spirits. He called me aside and told me
that there was a notion amongst some people in the town that the place would fall down. The
recollection of the catastrophe in the Brunswick Theatre was full upon his mind; but he had
done all that man could do, short of stopping the performances. He had gone over the
building with a surveyor, who had assured him that all was safe. Several of us went with
him early to the Hall, examined under his advice all the modes of getting out connected
with the stage, and at the same time were urged not to talk about our fears so that the
ladies might be alarmed. The place was crowded. The performances went on. Our manager
struggled with his nerves, and kept them under; but I saw upon him all the night the effect
of the apprehension. There were at least a thousand people present, and when they huzzaed
and stamped their feet till the roof shook again, we turned to each other, and heartily
wished the night was over. Between the fear and the excitement of the popular
demonstration, everybody had a racking headache.
From Sunderland we went to Sheffield. This was the last performance of
“Not so bad as we seem.”
At Manchester and Liverpool, where the Comedy had been acted in the early part of the year,
other pieces were to be substituted. Writing home, I said, “On the 1st of
September I made my last appearance on any stage. It is melancholy to think
upon.” At Manchester a banquet was given in the Athenæum to the Members of the
Guild. Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton was of the guests, as
President of the Guild. Few men have greater power of treating common-
Ch. VI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 121 |
place topics with an effect which seems as original as it is graceful. Mr. Dickens has acquired a reputation for after-dinner
speeches, which renders his advocacy all-powerful for objects of public benevolence. Coming
after these masters I was somewhat abashed at having to propose the Manchester Free
Library. Two days after the banquet this Library was formally opened, and some of us had
again to give utterance to our own sentiments, instead of repeating the words set down for
us. But in connection with the higher interests of Literature and Art, for which the Guild
was established, there could be no words more effective than those of the Comedy in which
Lord Wilmot, the man of fashion, addresses
David Fallen, the starving author, “Oh,
trust me, the day shall come, when men will feel that it is not charity we owe to the
Ennoblers of Life—it is Tribute! When their order shall rise with the civilisation it called into
being; and, amidst an assembly of all that is lofty and fair in the chivalry of birth,
it shall refer its claim to just rank among freemen, to some Queen whom even a
Milton might have sung, and even a Hampden have died for!”
I have not forgotten that our business arrangements, and financial
affairs, owed much of their regularity to the unceasing care of Mr. W. H. Wills. A large sum was collected, and invested. An Act of
Parliament was obtained, for the constitution of the Guild in a corporate capacity, so as
to hold property. From the wording of the Act, seven years had to elapse before any steps
could be taken to carry out our plans. At the present time, three houses, commodious,
well-finished, are being erected upon Sir E. Bulwer
Lytton’s land, near Stevenage.
Alexander the Great (356 BC-323 BC)
Macedonian conqueror; the son of Philip II, he was king of Macedon, 336-323 BC.
George Bancroft (1800-1891)
American historian, secretary of the navy, and minister to Great Britain (1846); he was
author of
History of the United States, 10 vols (1834-74).
Robert Bell (1800-1867)
Irish journalist and miscellaneous writer educated at Trinity College, Dublin; he was
editor of
The Atlas and edited the English poets in 29 volumes
(1854-57).
William Buckland (1784-1856)
Professor of mineralogy at Oxford (1813), president of the Geological Society (1824), and
dean of Westminster (1845-56).
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
William Caxton (1422 c.-1492)
The first English printer, who set up a press at Westminster in 1476 and translated
several of the books he published.
John Payne Collier (1789-1883)
English poet, journalist, antiquary, and learned editor of Shakespeare and Spenser; his
forgeries of historical documents permanently tarnished his reputation.
William Wilkie Collins (1824-1889)
English novelist, author of
The Woman in White (1860) and
The Moonstone (1868).
Dudley Costello (1803-1865)
English journalist educated at Sandhurst; from 1838 he was foreign correspondent to the
Morning Herald; he was a friend of Charles Dickens.
Peter Cunningham (1816-1869)
Son of the poet and biographer Allan Cunningham; he was a miscellaneous writer and chief
clerk in the Audit Office.
Charles Dickens (1812-1870)
English novelist, author of
David Copperfield and
Great Expectations.
Augustus Leopold Egg (1816-1863)
English genre and history painter who specialized in literary subjects.
John Forster (1812-1876)
English man of letters and friend of Charles Lamb and Leigh Hunt who was editor of
The Examiner (1847-55) and the biographer of Goldsmith (1854),
Landor (1869), and Dickens (1872-74).
Thomas Grieve (1799-1882)
The son of the scene-painter John Henderson Grieve (d. 1845); he followed his father's
profession, working as a set designer at Covent Garden.
John Hampden (1595-1643)
English statesman who led the parliamentarians in the political contest with Charles
I.
Richard Hengist Horne (1802-1884)
English poet and novelist educated at Sandhurst; he imitated Shelley and corresponded
with Elizabeth Barrett.
Douglas William Jerrold (1803-1857)
English playwright and miscellaneous writer; he made his reputation with the play
Black-eyed Susan (1829) and contributed to the
Athenaeum,
Blackwood's, and
Punch.
Frances Maria Kelly (1790-1882)
English actress and singer at Drury Lane and elsewhere; Charles Lamb proposed marriage
and later wrote an essay about her (“Barbara S”) in the
London
Magazine (1825).
Charles Knight (1791-1873)
London publisher, originally of Windsor where he produced
The
Etonian; Dallas's
Recollections of Lord Byron was one of
his first ventures. He wrote
Passages of a Working Life during half a
Century, 3 vols (1864-65).
James Sheridan Knowles (1784-1862)
Irish-born playwright, author of
Virginius (1820),
Caius Gracchus (1823),
William Tell (1825)
and
The Hunchback (1832).
Mark Lemon (1809-1870)
English playwright and journalist who contributed to
Household
Words and other periodicals before becoming the first editor of
Punch (1841-70).
Thomas Littledale (1818-1861)
Of Highfield House; educated at Rugby School, he was, like his father, also Thomas (d.
1847), a Liverpool cotton manufacturer. He was mayor of Liverpool in 1851.
Charles Mathews (1776-1835)
Comic actor at the Haymarket and Covent Garden theaters; from 1818 he gave a series of
performances under the title of
Mr. Mathews at Home.
Charles James Mathews (1803-1878)
The son of the comedian Charles Mathews; he was an actor, playwright, and theater
manager.
Henry Hart Milman (1791-1868)
Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford, he was a poet, historian and dean of St
Paul's (1849) who wrote for the
Quarterly Review.
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
English scientist and president of the Royal Society; author of
Philosophae naturalis principia mathematica (1687).
Samuel Phelps (1804-1878)
Shakespearean actor and theater manager at Sadler's Wells (1844-62).
Pindar (522 BC c.-443 BC)
Greek lyric poet who celebrated athletic victories in elaborate odes that became models
for intricate and often elliptical odes in English.
David Roberts (1796-1864)
Scottish-born artist employed as a scene-painter before travelling in the Middle-East and
exhibiting at the Royal Academy from 1826.
Clarkson Stanfield (1793-1867)
After service in the Navy he became a scene-painter for Drury Lane and was afterwards a
marine and landscape painter and Royal Academician (1835).
Frank Stone (1800-1859)
Born in Manchester, he was a self-taught painter of literary subjects and friend of
William Makepeace Thackeray and Charles Dickens.
Sir John Tenniel (1820-1914)
The son of a fencing and dancing master, he became a book illustrator and cartoonist for
Punch; he was the illustrator for Lewis Carroll's
Alice books.
Jacob Tonson (1655-1736)
London bookseller and member of the Kit-Kat Club; the elder Tonson published Dryden; his
son, also Jacob Tonson (1682-1735), published Pope.
Francis William Topham (1808-1877)
English watercolorist who illustrated Walter Scott's
Waverley
novels, S. C. Hall's
Book of Gems (1836), and Charles Dickens's
A Child's History of England.
Robert Walpole, first earl of Orford (1676-1745)
English politician whose management of the financial crisis resulting from the South Sea
Bubble led to his commanding career the leader of the Whigs in Parliament (1721-42).
James White (1803-1862)
Educated at Glasgow University and Pembroke College, Oxford, he was an Anglican
clergyman, playwright, and friend of Charles Dickens.
William Henry Wills (1810-1880)
English journalist; he wrote for the periodicals, served on the staff of
Punch, and was a friend of Charles Dickens, acting as sub-editor at
Household Words.
The Times. (1785-). Founded by John Walter, The Times was edited by Thomas Barnes from 1817 to 1841. In the
romantic era it published much less literary material than its rival dailies, the
Morning Chronicle and the
Morning
Post.