Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Chapter XI
CHAPTER XI.
THE material and social aspects of London, in its wondrous
growth during the reign of the present Queen, are constantly changing, presenting new
combinations of form and colour, like the fragments of the kaleidoscope shaken together
into new figures. At the London of 1844 I gave a few rapid glances (Vol. II. Chapter 13).
There were remarkable opportunities for observing the London of 1862, and of deriving from
the observations of strangers from our own country districts, and of foreigners of every
nation, those impressions which familiarity is too apt to veil from our notice. That was
the year of the Second Great Industrial Exhibition, when the Metropolis was alive not only
with unwonted gatherings of our own population from the most distant parts of the three
kingdoms; with dwellers in every region of our Colonial Empire; but with men of commerce
from all lands, who came to compare our industrial labours with their own. Foreign workmen
were with us in unusual numbers, and to those, especially, from France, our Prime Minister
desired that it might be said that there ought to be emulation, but no jealousy, between
the productive industries of both countries. But there was a class of foreign visitors,
who, if they were less numerous than the foreign capitalists and operatives, had far more
influence in forming the judgment of the world
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 223 |
upon what they saw in
England. The Men of Letters came here to criticise and to teach. The French Journalists,
whose mission was to describe the Exhibition of 1862, have left some curious and not
uninstructive observations upon our outer life, of which they might correctly note the
salient points, and of our inner life, of which they could really know little or nothing.
Let me endeavour to note something of the general characteristics of the various classes of
visitors who were filling our streets and our public places, from the 1st of May till the
1st of November, in the year when Queen Victoria
completed a quarter of a century of her reign. It was a remarkable year. A year of mourning
and a year of banquets. A year in which Europe was at peace, whilst America was drunk with
the excitement of Civil War. A year in which the wonders of International Industry were
spread forth for universal admiration, whilst the machines of the greatest industrial
district of the world were lying idle, and the workmen of the now silent factories were
starving for lack of the material upon which to work.
In the “Transactions of
the National Association for the Promotion of Social Science” for 1862, it
is stated that at the Metropolitan Meeting held in the Guildhall of the City a larger
number of members was present than on any previous occasion, and that the attendance of
foreigners was numerous. These Transactions record that on Saturday, June 7th, a Soirée of
the Members of the Association and their friends was held in the Palace at Westminster,
when “Westminster Hall, St. Stephen’s Hall, the Central Hall, the Houses of
Lords and Commons, and the corridors were thrown open, and a spectacle was pre-
224 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
sented, more especially in the great Hall, illuminated for the
occasion, which will probably never be forgotten by any who witnessed it.”
Certainly the spectacle was one which I cannot readily forget. The sober record of the
Transactions of the Association may justify the higher colouring with which I described it
a few months afterwards. “To see Westminster Hall lighted up more brilliantly than
at the Coronation of George the Fourth—to be able to
trace, as clearly as if it were in the glory of a noonday sun, every carving of that
matchless roof—to move amidst hundreds of fair women without impediment from train or
crinoline—to hear some blooming student of her country’s history ask, Is this the
place where King Charles was tried? Was Richard the Second here deposed? Then to wander through
the gorgeous corridors of Parliament—to touch the Speaker’s chair in the House of
Commons—to gaze upon the throne in the House of Lords—this spectacle was a surprise to
many a visitor, and not without its lessons to all. The genius of the Constitution was
here enshrined; and Public Opinion, all powerful though irresponsible, held high
festival in the seats where the spirit of Feudality once reigned absolute, to be
succeeded by the more unclean spirit of Party—both finally to be vanquished when the
popular voice could be fairly heard, and the welfare of the many should triumph over
the interests of the few.”
On this occasion, I was conversing in the Hall with Mr. Thoms—known to Peers as their Deputy Librarian, and to
Men of Letters as the learned and ingenious Editor of “Notes and Queries”—when I heard a well-known voice
behind me, and almost
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 225 |
immediately felt a friendly hand upon my
shoulder. It was Lord Brougham. Though his face was
furrowed, there was something like the old lustre in his eyes, and the smile that has so
often told of the kindliness that was as natural as the power of sarcasm still lingered
about his mouth. After a little talk he went on. Either Mr. Thoms or I
exclaimed, “What changes that man has witnessed!” There was no change
more remarkable than that which was connected with his appearance in this Hall as President
of an Association for the Promotion of Social Science. For what were the departments of the
so-called Social Science over which he had been that day watching? Two of the most
important were that of Jurisprudence, and that of Punishment and Reformation. There were
discussions going forward on a Minister of Justice, and on Statute Law Consolidation; on
Magisterial Procedure; on the Law of Master and Servant. There were discussions on the
Convict System; on Prison Discipline; on the Reformatory Movement; on the Non-Imprisonment
of Children. When Henry Brougham first paced Westminster Hall in 1808,
Eldon was Chancellor. The mere mention of that name
is sufficient to show the differences that half a century had produced. To have talked
about a sweeping reform of the Criminal Law would have been utterly vain, when the
all-powerful Chancellor was shedding prophetic tears over the fallen Constitution, because
the Legislature thought that a man ought not to be hanged for stealing in a dwelling-house
to the value of five shillings. Then to have talked about the Convict System as any other
than a very easy mode of dispensing with any nice distinctions about secondary 226 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
punishments, would have been as fruitless as to have argued that
free settlers in a Colony might probably thrive better if they were not surrounded with a
legion of miscreants. To speak of the Reformatory System would have been met by the common
answer, “What’s bred in tha bone will never come out of the
flesh.” Ragged Schools for street vagabonds would have been thought even a more
Utopian dream than that all the people should be taught to read and write. The amazement of
the old race of legislators, amongst whom Henry Brougham uttered his
Maiden Speech in 1810, would have merged in ridicule, had he then dreamed that the time
would come when a self-elected pseudo-Parliament would meet in London, after five previous
years of peregrination to Birmingham, Liverpool, Bradford, Glasgow, and Dublin, to project
and to discuss how to make the world better than they found it. More startling would have
been the prediction that, to learn and to instruct, there would come from a country where
the State was perpetually interfering with Charitable and Philanthropic Institutions,
eminent men to form part of the “Congrès International de Bienfaisance,” in
which the condition of the City-Arab of London and the gamin of Paris would have been set
forth by competent observers, and discussed with the object how to best clean away the
slough of these social wounds.
Macaulay, nearly forty years before the time we are
describing, wrote in the Quarterly Magazine, “This is the
age of Societies. There is scarcely one Englishman in ten who has not belonged to some
Association for distributing books, or for prosecuting them; for sending invalids to
the hospital, or beggars to the treadmill; for giving plate to the rich, or
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 227 |
blankets to the poor.” In 1823 the age had made a very
small advance in manifesting the power of the principle of Association, compared with 1862.
In the May of every year the Metropolis is crowded with religions and moral
philanthropists, who may be seen struggling day by day at the entrances of Exeter Hall,
eager to obtain seats near the platform. The additional attraction of the Great Exhibition
doubled these usual crowds. When the foreigner had sufficient knowledge of our language to
understand the placards on the walls, and the advertisements in the newspapers, he might
conceive that England was intent upon exhibiting herself in her most amiable aspect, for
the wonder or edification of those who came from other lands to look upon her. Surely he
might think, all this agitation for benevolent purposes—for the relief of distress, for
education, for religious instruction—cannot always be going on. Once a year the people were
to be stimulated into philanthropy; at other times the wretched would have no advocates for
their relief, the ignorant no pleaders for their better teaching. A closer acquaintance
with the every-day working of English Society, in town or in country, would show him that
this aspect of London was not exceptional. He would, perhaps, believe in time—even if he
had gone to sleep under the drowsy voice of Exeter Hall, or had felt no stirring of his
spirit at its boisterous harangues—even if he had been taken to one of those festive but
not hilarious Meetings for charitable purposes, which are perhaps more vapid than the
noonday speechifications—that all these exhibitions grew out of that social condition in
which public opinion was all-paramount. In looking upon these institutions, he might learn
228 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
that nothing would be successful which ran counter to the
feelings of any class sufficiently prominent to be appealed to; and that for any large
object connected with the real work of social improvement, all classes generally agreed to
compromise the prejudices of station or habit.
M. Esquiros, a writer in the “Révue des Deux Mondes,” described with great
animation, a very peculiar aspect of the principle of Association amongst the unfashionable
orders of pleasure-seekers. In giving a picture of the route to the Exhibition, he says
“The most curious amongst the vehicles are immense chars-à-banc—pleasure-vans. One or two amateurs, mounted on the
coach-box, sound a horn, or blow, till they become blue, on other instruments of brass,
to charm the hours of the journey; whilst all the party, men and women huddled
together, express by a thousand shades of countenance the various emotions of joy and
surprise at the sight of this theatre of streets, where the passers-by are at once
spectators and actors.” Had he beheld on the 15th of August, a cavalcade of
pleasure-vans and of every variety of humble vehicles, down to the donkey-cart, his
curiosity might have been excited to learn something of the meaning of this extraordinary
procession in another direction—to the Crystal Palace of Sydenham. It was the Fête day of
“The Most Ancient Order of Foresters.” Eighty thousand persons, men,
women, and children,—the members of this illustrious Order belonging to London and its
neighbourhood, with their wives and children—displayed on that day an example of the spirit
of Association in the English people altogether extraordinary. If he had been told that the
Foresters
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 229 |
are one of many Secret Societies, he might have been
carried back to thoughts of the Fehm Gericht, and other terrible fraternities of the Middle
Ages: of the Illuminati, who spread such terror in Europe before the French Revolution.
These Foresters are amongst the most harmless and honest fraternities, who have no object
whatever but to relieve each other’s necessities, upon the principle of independence,
asking no aid from the rich, no patronage from the great. One of the most curious and
valuable contributions to the statistics of England and Wales is the Annual Report of
Mr. Tidd Pratt, the Registrar of Friendly
Societies. This intelligent officer has the duty of examining and certifying the Rules of
Friendly Societies, and also any alteration of their Rules, and further to digest into an
abstract the names and addresses of the several Societies, the funds of each, and its
number of members, according to the Returns which their officers submit to the proper
authority. The aggregate amount of their funds may, without exaggeration, be called
enormous. Mr. Tidd Pratt says, “The great antiquity of these
funds for self-help is a proof that they meet the spirit of this people in every age.
The changes that have of late years followed a more enlightened legislation evidence
their desire to keep pace with the growing intelligence of the country.”
Mr. Pratt explains that the first societies established under the
Friendly Societies’ Acts were merely Benefit Clubs; that of late years some have been
formed into Orders, or Societies to which only the initiated have admission, in imitation
of the Freemasons. In my own boyhood, I remember people laughing at the follies of the free
and easy drinking clubs, known as Lodges 230 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
of Druids and Odd Fellows;
and I fancied that I should like to see the interior of those wonderful rooms, in which
thriving shop-keepers wore grotesque robes, and the listeners outside could hear the mimic
thunder with which the candidate for initiation was to be alarmed. Probably these
absurdities are given up amongst the Secret Friendly Societies of sixty years later; for,
whether called the Manchester Unity of Odd Fellows, The Ancient Order of Foresters, The
Ancient Order of Shepherds, The Ancient Order of Romans, The Ancient Order of Druids, or by
half-a-dozen other queer titles, they have in their Lodges business to perform which
requires prudent and vigilant administrators, and sober members, having an earnest purpose
to accomplish. These, and all other Benefit Societies, are Associations whose first object
is to shield each other from destitution during sickness. They also provide for the burial
of their members. Amongst the “Orders” that are classed as Secret, each single
Society comprises the Order, manages its own affairs, pays its own sick members, as well as
funeral expenses, but is repaid by a levy made over the whole districts in which various
Lodges of the same Order are included. By patient calculation many of the interesting
details connected with these Orders might be obtained from the Registrar’s Report.
They are digested into a valuable
article in the “Quarterly
Review” for October, 1864, from which we learn that the Manchester Unity,
established in nearly every part of the British dominions, contains 358,556 members, whose
annual contributions are above 350,000l., and their reserved capital
estimated at nearly two millions sterling. The Ancient Order of Foresters, which is next in
im- Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 231 |
portance, comprises above 250,000 members. The Manchester
Unity is strongest in Lancashire, the Foresters in Middlesex.
Three millions of working men have spontaneously organized themselves into
these Benefit Societies. They represent an aggregate of one-third of the entire population
of these kingdoms. But they have never arrogated to themselves the exclusive title of The People. Did the French workmen, who came to England in 1862,
believe that they were the sole representatives of The People of France? They have never
wanted instructors in that belief. M. Texier, a French Journalist,
could not see the English People as he looked around him:—“One would say, that the
people do not exist in this immense city of London, and that it is exclusively
inhabited by nobles and the middle class; the same uniformity of costume, habits,
manners, visages . . . This, in my opinion, seems to be the true reason why London
looks so sad in French eyes. When you walk through these streets, in the midst of
omnibuses and carriages, among this population which encumbers the squares, the
bridges, the public walks, you cannot at first explain why all that meets your
eye—splendid equipages, glittering shops, buildings, and public—all look dull. It is
only when you seek to solve the singular problem, you find out what makes London so
monotonous, apart from its industrial and commercial sphere, is the absence of the people—of the people who are everywhere
in Paris, who animate and make gay the streets and squares, the public gardens and the
Boulevards, who are seated at our theatres, who mingle in all our ceremonies, and who
hold a prominent place in all our public fêtes.”
Wonder-
232 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
ful power of the blouse! Might not
a better sort of equality be indicated by the fact, that the English workman, when he holds
“a prominent place in all our public fêtes,” has no distinctive
dress!
One of the correspondents of the French journals discovered that the
English were much improved, not in reality, but in the art of concealing their sullenness,
taciturnity, and selfishness. They answer civilly to questions put to them by strangers,
and they complacently go out of their way to show the enquirer which way he should go.
Another writer describes London as much changed since 1851, principally as regards manners
and sentiments. When Frenchmen came to London in 1851, their long beards excited universal
astonishment. London has adopted the French beards, so that the last Exhibition produced a
revolution in English visages. Another says, the ladies have shaken off the old pride and
the old toilet, for the wardrobe of England is renewed from top to toe. But there is
something in our streets more remarkable to the reflective Frenchman than beards and
crinolines, than the over crowded thoroughfares, or the general absence of architectural
grandeur or regularity. He has come from a city where everything is regulated and
regimented, and he is wonder-struck by the absence of authority in everything that occurs
in London. Traversing the immense metropolis, there were not ten soldiers to be seen by an
observer who saw and admired the one functionary who watched over his safety, saving him
from annoyance and even danger—the benevolent policeman. At the raising of his hand the
disasters were at once prevented which would have resulted from an agglomeration of car-
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 233 |
riages. “In this great city the citizen is king, but he is,
above all, the servant of the law.” One of the French journalists,
M. Sherer, is earnest upon this theme, in common with most of the
higher intellects of France:—“Elsewhere, regulations are the rule; elsewhere
liberty exists only where it is expressly stipulated; but in England it is liberty
which is everywhere, and always supposed. Elsewhere civil life is encircled by a
network, invisible but inextricable, of restrictions; but in England every man speaks,
teaches, prints, meets, associates, builds, travels, exercises his calling in industry
and commerce, fills the professions, carries out all his designs, without hindrance
from anything whatever but the equal right of his neighbour. For the truth of what we
say we fearlessly appeal to all who have crossed the channel. They may find England
monotonous; its climate sombre, its towns ugly, its inhabitants stiff, its institutions
Gothic; they may grumble and find fault as much as they please; but there is one thing
they cannot deny, and that is, that it is in England the man who loves liberty can
breathe most freely.” But it was not every French Journalist who looked so
complacently upon the surface of society, beneath, which there is something that indicates
the real character of the people. Some of these Newspaper Correspondents were equally
dissatisfied whether they saw the Londoners serious or frolicsome. One gentleman, finding
the shops, the theatres, and the casinos shut on Sundays, exclaims, “It is a
country of savages!” Another goes to Epsom on the Derby-day. He cannot
understand its wondrous excitement. He calls the return to London a perilous journey; its
practical jokes savage 234 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
and brutal. The philosophical M.
Bosquet writes, “I like England too much to join her flatterers.
These see in such manners of other times the maintenance of the national character. I
see in them the persistence of barbarism; the remnant of the ancient grossness of
feudal, or simply of aristocratic, manners, when it was necessary to give the people,
not examples, but amusements.”
There were large classes of strangers in London besides those who came to
visit the International Exhibition. There was an Agricultural Show in Battersea Park—a show
of unexampled magnitude and interest. Never before were got together such a vast collection
of horses, cattle, sheep, pigs, and machinery, sent from every district of the United
Kingdom, and from neighbouring countries of Europe. The competition showed how England had
gone ahead since Sir Robert Peel, on the memorable
night of 1846 when he destroyed the principle of Protection for Agriculture, exclaimed to
the House of Commons, “Choose your motto, Advance, or Recede.” At this
Exhibition it would have been very difficult for the critic who attaches so much importance
to the costume of the people, to distinguish the Peer from the Yeoman. He would observe two
men of florid faces and stalwart limbs, pointing out to each other the beauty of that
Shorthorn, or the novelty of that Drill. The one might be the lord of thousands of
acres—the other the tenant who farms two hundred, but has learnt that he cannot keep pace
with the richer capitalist unless he regards Agriculture as a science, and as a manufacture
in which skill and profit must go hand-in-hand. There were often to be seen in the various
public
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 235 |
places of London, young soldiers clothed in every shade of
green or grey, but very few lighting up the sombre aspect of our out-of-door dress with the
national scarlet. These were the Volunteers. They had come from all parts of the kingdom to
the Wimbledon Prize Meeting. Our critics were inclined upon the whole to look complacently
upon an institution which had sprung up at a very recent date, but which, in all
likelihood, will continue to be a permanent means of self-defence. “We should be
surprised,” writes one, “if the institution of Volunteers, after
having, perhaps, suggested to the foreign spectator some of those jokes which our
neighbours themselves do not spare their citizen soldiers—if, we repeat, this army,
springing up, as if by enchantment, from the ranks of an industrious people, did not
fill the hearts of our countrymen with, a feeling of respect and admiration.”
During this Exhibition year there were attractions for artists of all
countries. The Gallery of the Fine Arts in the Exhibition, crowded as it was by persons of
all ranks, had produced a change in the opinions of some of our foreign observers. One
writer says “The French had thought too lightly that the people of London were
indifferent to the beautiful.” For the musical artists there were
opportunities of seeing that the English are not altogether deficient in musical taste. The
French journalist, whose inquiries rarely extended beyond the purlieus of Leicester Square,
going to the taverns where music, and that not of the lowest caste, is provided for the
entertainment of the guests, says he is reminded of the cafes chantants. The musical
artists might learn from our various concerts that we were establishing some claim
236 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
to be called a musical nation. Out of this progress had grown the
Amateur Performances, which would show the foreigner how England could put her whole heart
into a work which was worthy of enthusiastic devotion. On the 24th of June, four thousand
vocal and instrumental performers were arranged in an Orchestra in the Crystal Palace for
the performance of the “Messiah.” The vocalists, with
a few exceptions of solo singers, were the choral bodies of our cathedrals, the members of
the London Sacred Harmonic Society, and a host of other amateurs from our great
manufacturing towns and marts of commerce. And these, who had daily labours to perform in
their several vocations, executed on this day the well-known choruses in a way never before
realized; and, on two subsequent days, exhibited such a mastery over the great
composer’s less familiar works, as told for the first time to our generation what a
mighty genius had come to England, a poor foreigner, at one time patronized and at another
persecuted, till his matchless science had triumphed over both patronage and persecution,
and he had become to us a glorious household name, like the names of Shakspere and of Milton.
Let us inquire a little how this host of foreigners made their way to
London, and how our own people, from the East, the West, and the North, were brought day by
day to the metropolis of the South. The steam communication with France, Belgium, Holland,
and the Baltic was far more certain and rapid than at any former period. In the United
Kingdom there were about eleven thousand miles of railway open for traffic. The various
Companies had about fifteen thousand carriages for the conveyance of passengers.
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 237 |
Excursion trains from town and village were organized throughout the
country. It was a pleasant sight to see five hundred men and women, often with their
children,—artisans and the higher orders of agricultural labourers,—turn out from the great
metropolitan railway-stations, all dressed in their holiday suits. At the London-bridge
station groups of foreigners might be observed gazing about them, little at their ease,
before they plunged into the labyrinth that was before them. Most of the foreigners had
also travelled in third-class carriages, for, whether French, German, or Dutch, they had
been accustomed, upon payment of the lowest fare, to be decently accommodated. With the
exception of one or two Companies, the third-class carriages of the English railways were
then, as they continue to be, the disgrace of the country. And, yet, the third-class
passengers have always formed no inconsiderable part of the millions who contribute to the
dividends of railway shareholders. The total number of passengers of all classes in 1862
was a hundred and eighty millions. We may judge of the proportions of the various classes
at that period by the later returns of the Board of Trade. Of two hundred and four millions
of passengers, twenty-six millions were first class, fifty-seven millions second class, and
one hundred and twenty-one millions third class. During 1863 the total receipts from
first-class passengers was over three millions; from second-class over four millions; and
from third-class very nearly five millions. One who has travelled a good deal in this
country says, “Railway-directors and managers seem to hold it incumbent on them—a
part of their traditional policy, on which not even a shadow of doubt is to be
permitted for a moment to rest—to 238 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
discourage the third-class
passenger traffic, as a regular part of the service. . . . . What they seem chiefly to
dread is that persons who, according to their notions, ought to
travel in the first or second class, would travel in the third, if the third were made
convenient as to time, and endurable as to the vehicle.” And yet this policy
does not always succeed. If open carriages are provided for the summer-travel, gentlemen will go in them, without a fear of coming in too close a
contact with humble companions. They probably find as much entertainment and instruction in
the frank manners of the majority of English working-people, as in the fastidious silence
of the mournful first class, where no one presumes to speak to another, if there be no
previous link of personal acquaintance. Men of sense are too glad to escape from this
atmosphere of exclusiveness. The accurate observer whom I have quoted says, “The
casual traveller in a third-class carriage seldom fails to notice the greater urbanity
and gentleness of manner observable among what railway officials would regard as
third-class travellers proper, as compared with the same class ten or twenty years ago.
In a great measure this is, as we believe, the result of the more frequent association
in their journeys with people of a somewhat higher grade; for, despite the directors,
second and even first class people will travel third class, even
now. And, as the result of our own experience, we must say, that we have witnessed
quite as much courtesy and good feeling exercised towards the well-dressed of both
sexes, and listened to as shrewd and intelligent conversation in a third class
carriage, as in an average first or second class. Rude, coarse, and ill-bred fellows
there are sometimes, Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 239 |
of necessity, but even the rudest or
coarsest ‘rough’ is subdued, if he finds himself in a light, clean, and
cheerful carriage, among well-behaved and intelligent people. In a close, dark and
filthy pen he takes courage, and behaves as though he were at home.”*
When the stranger had arrived in London, comfortably or uncomfortably, he
would, during his sojourn naturally desire to go about the great city in its public
conveyances. The steam-boat on the river would be to him a constant delight. The cabs and
omnibuses in the street a perpetual nuisance. There were five thousand cabs in London in
1862. In addition to the usual number of cabs, there were brought into use many of the
shabbiest and dirtiest vehicles, drawn by the most wretched horses, and with drivers who
seldom knew their way. The ordinary supply was not of the best order, and it would have
been a very remarkable circumstance if any non-resident passenger had not been asked for
double his proper fare. The policeman—the never-tiring benefactor of the stranger in
London—is generally at hand to enforce something like moderation. Happy was the party of
three or four who could obtain a decent cab, compared with the misery of riding in the
narrow and altogether uncomfortable omnibus. In that social vehicle the foreigner would
probably encounter some of the most unsocial people that London can produce, and from their
demeanour on too many occasions—sitting as close as possible together, to prevent a
stranger obtaining a seat;
240 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
having the windows open or shut at the sole pleasure of an
individual; with many other agreeable varieties of low-bred pretension,—he would perhaps be
justified in coming to the conclusion that there was still a good deal of selfishness in
England.
In 1862 London was just beginning to put on the aspect of a city
beleaguered by powerful armies, preparing for defence. Throughout long lines of
thoroughfare the foreigner would meet with obstructive sheds, and behold tons of earth
accumulating under their roofs as the clay and the gravel gradually rose to the surface. He
would learn that mighty works of engineering were going forward, which, in a few years,
would remove from the city that pollution of its noble river which had made it a common
sewer of three millions of people. He would be told that other apertures were being made,
to give light and air to an underground railway beneath the crowded streets—a work almost
as remarkable, and certainly more useful, than the Thames Tunnel, which had so long excited
the wonder of Frenchmen. But he would only witness the very small beginnings of that system
which, in 1864, has reduced London to the condition of a city in a state of siege. It has
been invaded on every side by railway directors, whose motto has not been
“Parcere subjectis et debellare
superbos” but to pull down the lowly, and if possible to spare the
proud. To avoid heavy compensation, the lines of railway that are penetrating into the very
heart of the town, are taken through the poorest districts. In one connecting line of the
North London Railway nine hundred houses have been pulled down. There is no help, either
for the workman or his employer,
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 241 |
when the great despot of our days
asserts his prerogative. Ahab will not mourn that
Naboth refuses his vineyard, for Ahab has a
very powerful machinery for compelling obedience. Naboth is too weak
to go to law, so Ahab gets the vineyard; and
Naboth may die, not by assassination, but by the very act of being
turned out of his old home. No doubt much of this is for the public good eventually, but
the immediate suffering may be too intense to be mitigated by private or public
benevolence; by the erection of “Dwellings for the Working-classes;” or by a
Clause in Acts for the Extension of Railways within the Metropolis, that the Companies
should run daily trains for labourers to stations just outside London at an extremely low
rate. These incidents in the wholesale destruction of houses of commerce, and houses of
humble poverty, constitute a large amount of what are really private wrongs. There are some
who, like myself, may remember that there was a cottage abutting on the Pavilion at
Brighton, the owner of which sturdily refused to part with it to the Prince Regent at any price. No doubt he was a churlish
proprietor, but he was an example of the mode in which, amidst a good deal of public
oppression, private rights could be asserted on the old principle which Chatham glorified as the highest boast of an Englishman—the
inviolability of Home:—“The poorest man in his cottage may bid defiance to all the
forces of the Crown. It may be frail; its roof may shake; the wind may blow through it;
the storm may enter it; but the King of England cannot enter
it!” The Railway King can. But in addition to private wrongs, let the
Legislature take care that the new tyranny should inflict no 242 | PASSAGES OF A WORKING LIFE: | [Ch. XI. |
public
wrongs. It must be allowed, I suppose, to make our thoroughfares hideous with its viaducts;
to destroy all picturesqueness in our few models of noble architecture, by intercepting
their view; but let it not be allowed to touch the unequalled open spaces of our
metropolis—the parks, which, however foreigners might complain of the ugliness of our
streets, they were compelled to acknowledge were in their beauty, as well as their utility,
such possessions of the crown and the people as no other capital could show.
I have not attempted a description of the International Exhibition of
1862, and I have for similar reasons refrained from presenting any details of the former
grand display of the Industry of all Nations. There was another English Exhibition in 1857,
in one respect even more remarkable than either of these—the “Exhibition of the Art
Treasures of the United Kingdom,” at Manchester. That a committee of mill-owners and
merchants, in our greatest manufacturing city, should have conceived the bold design of
asking for the loan of the master-pieces of the private collections of the country; that
they should have raised a large guarantee fund in a few weeks, and have erected a handsome
building,—were not in themselves very extraordinary circumstances. The wonder and the
honour were, that the appeal was instantly answered, by the highest and noblest in the
land—that such a collection of the Old Masters was got together as no gallery of Europe
could show, nor indeed several galleries united. There was also a gallery of British
Portraits, unequalled in its extent and importance, collected by Mr. Peter Cunningham. Foreigners wondered; and
Ch. XI.] | THE THIRD EPOCH. | 243 |
began to see that the Fine Arts were appreciated amongst us.
Englishmen gloried, in this manifest symptom that the long reign of exclusiveness was over—that the proprietors of these “treasures” held
them as trustees for mankind. One of the pleasantest sights of this exhibition was the
crowd of factory-workers, who were invited to come in after two o’clock on Saturdays
at a very small price. To me this Art Exhibition afforded a pleasant holiday, for I had the
advantage of the taste and knowledge of my friend Mr.
Thorne in viewing this unrivalled collection.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
King Charles I of England (1600-1649)
The son of James VI and I; as king of England (1625-1649) he contended with Parliament;
he was revered as a martyr after his execution.
Peter Cunningham (1816-1869)
Son of the poet and biographer Allan Cunningham; he was a miscellaneous writer and chief
clerk in the Audit Office.
Alphonse Esquiros (1812-1876)
French writer and politician who published
L'Angleterre et la vie
anglaise, 5 vols (1859-1869).
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
John Tidd Pratt (1797-1870)
English barrister educated at the Inner Temple; he was a civil service commissioner
responsible for certifying the rules of savings banks and friendly societies.
John Scott, first earl of Eldon (1751-1838)
Lord chancellor (1801-27); he was legal counsel to the Prince of Wales and an active
opponent of the Reform Bill.
William John Thoms (1803-1885)
English antiquary who was secretary to the Camden Society (1838-73), assistant librarian
of the House of Lords (1862), and founded
Notes and Queries
(1849).
James Thorne (1815-1881)
Originally an artist, he was an antiquary and topographer who wrote for
The Mirror and
Penny Magazine and contributed to
The Land we Live in, 4 vols (1847-50).
Notes and Queries. (1849-). A weekly journal devoted to antiquarian inquires, founded and edited by William John
Thoms (1849-72).
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.