Passages of a Working Life during Half a Century
Preface
PASSAGES OF A WORKING
LIFE
DURING HALF A CENTURY:
WITH
A Prelude of Early Reminiscences.
BY
CHARLES KNIGHT.
“Let us be content in work
To do the thing we can, and not presume,
To fret because it’s little.”
Elizabeth Browning,
Aurora Leigh.
|
VOLUME I.
LONDON:
BRADBURY & EVANS, 11, BOUVERIE STREET.
1864.
LONDON:
BRADBURY AND EVANS, PRINTERS, WHITEFRIARS.
PREFACE.
IN 1862 I received an intimation from the proprietor of the
“Windsor and Eton Express,”
that, on the following first of August, the newspaper so called would have completed the
fiftieth year of its publication. The fact was an interesting one to me. That newspaper was
established by my father and myself; my proprietary
interest in it lasted for fourteen years; and I continued to be its editor till the end of
1826, as I had been from its commencement.
Looking back upon the August of 1812, at which time my working life really
commenced, it occurred to me that there were passages of that working life of fifty years
which might have an interest for a wider circle than that of my family and my immediate
friends, if presented without the tedious egotism of a formal Auto-Biography. During that
period my social position has not materially altered, and I have not had the advantage of
seeing “life in many lands.” I have therefore no startling incidents to relate,
and no great variety of scenes to describe. My occupation has
been that
of a publisher and a writer. But, in the course of my long connection with the Press (I use
this word in its most extended meaning), I have been brought into communication with many
eminent persons, and have been somewhat extensively mixed up with vast changes in the
social condition of the people, in the progress of which elementary education and popular
literature have been amongst the most efficient instruments of amelioration.
But before I start upon a long journey—broken, however, into several
stages,—it may give a completeness to my narrative if I put together some earlier
Reminiscences of circumstances by which I was surrounded, from the beginning of the
century, in my childhood and my advance to manhood. The first steps of self-formation are,
I think, always interesting to follow, however uneventful may be the subsequent career of
an individual. But my early days at Windsor have a wider interest, as they made me familiar
with the outward manifestations of the simple life of George the
Third and his Court—an old-fashioned life of publicity, which wholly passed
away in the seclusion of the next reign, when the King was seldom seen by his people, much
less living among them in a sort of family intimacy, such as I had looked upon from my
humble point of observation. In 1810, the regal aspect of Windsor was wholly changed by the
illness of the King. In 1812, when I put on the
responsibilities of full
age, the Regent was invested with unrestricted power.
There never was a more eventful period in the history of our country than the first twelve
years of the Nineteenth Century. They were calculated to produce a strong and abiding
impression upon the mind of a thoughtful youth, whose local associations were suggestive of
past dangers and triumphs—of the Blenheim of Anne and the
Crecy of Edward. Moreover, as I advanced towards
manhood, there was an outburst of literature, which stirred my spirit with a new power. If,
in recording my impressions of this memorable era, I should be able to recal some of the
enthusiasm of the passing time, I may not be without the hope of imparting an interest to
the Reminiscences of a solitary boy and an obscure young man.
The half-century of active employment which I look back upon is divided, in
my retrospection, into three epochs. I shall regard them as stages in my journey of life;
not always caring thus to measure my progress by any extreme nicety of dates; and not
suddenly halting when the interest of a subject carries me forward to its natural close.
I. From 1812 to the end of 1822, my chief occupation was that of a
journalist at Windsor. But my duties were not wholly limited to that narrow range, although
in tracing my course as the editor of a local paper I may regard some circumstances as of
peculiar interest. The political aspects of that
period are not
pleasant to review; when the thoughtful man saw as much to be apprehended from an
unsympathising Government as from a discontented people. In 1820 I made my first attempt in
publishing a Cheap Miscellany; and I have to estimate what Popular Literature was, at a
period when the majority looked upon Books for the Many as a very dangerous experiment in
giving a direction to the newly-diffused art of reading. At this period, also, of strong
political excitement, I was induced to accept the editorship of a London Weekly Newspaper.
My area of observation was thus somewhat enlarged. My aim was to make “The Guardian” as much a literary as a
political paper; and I thus incidentally acquired a familiarity with the Periodical
Literature of a time when Magazines were becoming more original and more influential. I
also gained some insight into the general commerce of books in that closing era of high
prices. During this period one of the pleasantest occupations of my Windsor life opened to
me, as the printer and publisher of “The
Etonian.” This circumstance led to my intercourse with that most
remarkable knot of Cambridge students who became the chief contributors to “Knight’s Quarterly Magazine.” It
may be sufficient to mention the names of Macaulay,
Praed, Sidney
Walker, Henry Nelson Coleridge (of
these I may, unhappily, speak without reserve), and add those of Derwent Coleridge, Henry
Malden, and John Moultrie, to give an
abiding interest to such remembrances. “The
Quarterly Magazine” chiefly led to my establishment as a London publisher
in the season of 1823. Through this year, and in 1824, I was occupied in the literary and
commercial management of that work, which was concluded after the publication of six
numbers. A second series was subsequently undertaken; but this attempt at a revival was of
too solid a character fitly to succeed its brilliant predecessor.
II. I had been gradually extending my field of business as a publisher of
Miscellaneous Books, and was not without the support of persons of reputation and
influence. Yet my experience of the risk of miscellaneous publishing became in a year or
two somewhat discouraging. In 1826, I had to struggle, in common with many others of my
craft, against the depression in value of all literary property. But in this period of
difficulty I was endeavouring to mature several plans for wholly and systematically
devoting myself to cheap Popular Literature. Some of the seed thus prepared was ultimately
sown.
In 1827 I became connected with the Society for the Diffusion of Useful
Knowledge; and soon after edited and published “The British Almanac” and “Companion,” and “The Library of Entertaining
Knowledge.” Through twenty years—until, indeed, the Society thought that
the time was come when individual enterprise would accomplish all that they had attempted—I
was more or less connected with this memorable Association. My remembrances will
embrace whatever, without violation of confidence, may be related of
this connection. I need not here particularise the eminent persons with whom I was brought
into contact, in carrying forward the works which were entrusted to my care as Publisher,
and in several cases as Editor. Other important works were undertaken by me without the
support of the Society’s reputation. I availed myself—perhaps more than most of the
publishers of that period—of the revived process of wood-engraving, to diffuse popular Art
as well as popular Literature. In this species of enterprise “The Penny Magazine” led the way. “The Pictorial Bible” was the most successful of the
more permanent class of such publications; the “Thousand and one Nights” was the most beautiful.
The “Pictorial History of
England” was followed by the “Pictorial Shakspere,” which was the most
congenial undertaking of my literary life; and then by the “London.” This series of years, which brought with
them unabated literary labour and most anxious commercial responsibility, were not without
their enjoyments of pleasant and remunerating work. They afforded me the consolation that I
was performing a public good, when I bore up, unaided, under the heavy load of “The Penny Cyclopædia,” overweighted by
taxation. This was the most busy and the most interesting period of my working life; and
its interest is heightened beyond measure to myself by the consideration that this epoch
was the great turning-point in our poli-tical and social history; that
it was a period of wonderful progress; and that many of the distinguished men with whom I
was associated can never be separated, by the future historian, from the course of that
peaceful revolution which has made the institutions of the country in harmony with the
advance of intelligence, and has identified the interests and the wishes of the rulers and
of the nation. In this period, also, I became officially connected, as a Publisher, with
those who originated and carried forward the Amendment of the Poor-Law and other cognate
reforms; and I was thus necessarily called upon to give a close attention to the principles
and practical working of measures which have so materially improved the Condition of the
People.
III. My third epoch is one of comparative repose. I edited and published the
extensive series of the “Weekly Volume.” I had
opportunities of seeing much of the actual condition of the country in editing “The Land we Live in,” during the
transition period of Free Trade. I assisted as Publisher in the great sanitary measures
which had assumed fresh importance. Gradually I withdrew from any novel undertakings
involving considerable risk; for I found that the new competition of excessive cheapness,
without regard to the quality of the reading made cheap, was not suited to the habits in
which I had been so long trained. But I had still to look for happiness in work. I had to
become more
a writer and editor than a publisher. A few separate volumes
were published for me by Mr. Murray. Larger
undertakings, connected with copyrights which I had retained, or was to create, were
published by Messrs. Bradbury & Evans. I was thus relieved from the minor cares of
business, and, having a just confidence in those to whom my interests were committed, I
could work more efficiently at my responsible duties as author and conductor. The nature of
my writings was such that I had to look upon the various phases of Society in the Past, and
so, by comparison, to estimate the Present more accurately and impartially than a view
mainly directed to current things might attain. Whilst engaged in writing the History of my
Country, I had also to keep a steady eye upon the general characteristics of its
progress—political, social, scientific, and literary; for I was occupied in reproducing,
with large additions, that Cyclopædia of
which I had been the proprietor and publisher under the Society for the Diffusion of Useful
Knowledge. In this evening of my life I had the happiness to become intimate with many who
were eminent in the imaginative walks of Literature; and I learnt, more completely than I
knew before, that it is not only the scientific and the philosophical who are advancing, by
their writings, the moral and intellectual developments of a nation.
In thus producing my memorials of Men and Books, of Social Progress and
Changing Manners, I
may be considered as risking the indulgence of the
garrulous egotism of advanced years. I hope that the form of “Passages” will
keep me from many of the usual faults of Auto-Biography. I shall prefer to speak of others
rather than of myself. I shall endeavour to deal with public realities rather than with
transient moods of my own mind. I have undertaken a survey of a “long tract of
time,” and, having often to rely upon my memory, may have to ask the indulgence of
the reader if he discover any mistakes in dates, or any confusion in the relation of one
circumstance to another. I never kept a diary. I am not sure that I should have had a
clearer view of the leading Passages of my life if I had done so. I was not always careful
in preserving letters. Yet somehow I feel as if I could find my way through labyrinths
which might be impenetrable in their obscurity, were it not for associations which conduct
me onward, even as the Indian can see his road by old footmarks which he alone can
recognise.
CHARLES KNIGHT.
November 11, 1863.
William Bradbury (1800-1869)
English printer, from 1830 in partnership with Frederick Evans.
Derwent Coleridge (1800-1883)
The son of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; educated at St John's College, Cambridge, he was
rector of Helston in Cornwall, principal of St Mark's College (1841), and a writer on
education. He contributed to
Knight's Quarterly Review.
Henry Nelson Coleridge (1798-1843)
The nephew and literary executor of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; he was a barrister and
reviewer for the
British Critic and
Quarterly
Review.
Frederick Mullett Evans (1803-1870)
London printer who in partnership with William Bradbury printed the works of Dickens and
Thackeray.
Charles Knight the elder (1750-1824)
Windsor bookseller and printer; he was the father of the publisher and writer of the same
name.
Henry Malden (1800-1876)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was a poet and classical scholar who was
professor of Greek at University College in London (1831-76). He contributed to
Knight's Quarterly Review.
John Moultrie (1799-1874)
Educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, he contributed witty Byronic verse to
the Etonian and Knight's Quarterly before becoming rector of Rugby where he was a friend of
Thomas Arnold.
John Murray III (1808-1892)
The son of the Anak of publishers; he successfully carried on the family publishing
business.
William Sidney Walker (1795-1846)
English poet, translator, and scholar educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge; he
suffered from mental disease and his poems and work on Shakespeare's prosody were published
posthumously. He contributed to the
Etonian and
Knight's Quarterly Review.
The Etonian. 2 vols (1820-1821). A monthly literary journal produced by a remarkable group of Eton scholars, edited by
Winthrop Mackworth Praed; Walter Blunt.
The Guardian. (1819-1825). A weekly Tory paper edited by Charles Knight from 1820-22.
The Penny Magazine. 16 vols (1832-1846). Edited by Charles Knight for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.