Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to Thomas Manning, [15 December 1800]
WE are damn’d!
Not the facetious epilogue could save us. For, as the
editor of the “Morning
Post,” quick-sighted gentleman! hath this morning truly observed,
(I beg pardon if I falsify his words, their profound sense I am sure I retain,)
both prologue and epilogue were worthy of accompanying such a piece; and indeed
(mark the profundity, Mister Manning)
were received with proper indignation by such of the audience only as thought
either worth attending to. Professor, thy glories wax dim! Again, the
incomparable author of the “True
Briton” declareth in his paper (bearing same date) that the
epilogue was an indifferent attempt at humour and character, and failed in
both. I forbear to mention the other papers, because I have not read them. O
Professor, how different thy feelings now
(quantum mutatus ab illo professore, qui in
agris philosophiæ tantas victorias aquisivisti),—how
different thy proud feelings but one little week ago,—thy anticipation of thy
nine nights,—those visionary claps, which have soothed thy soul by day and thy
dreams by night! Calling in accidentally on the Professor while he was out, I
was ushered into the study; and my nose quickly (most sagacious always) pointed
me to four tokens lying loose upon thy table, Professor, which indicated thy
violent and satanical pride of heart. Imprimis, there caught mine eye a list of
six persons, thy friends, whom thou didst meditate inviting to a sumptuous
dinner on the Thursday, anticipating the profits of thy Saturday’s play
to answer charges; I was in the honoured file! Next, a stronger evidence of thy
violent and almost satanical pride, lay a list of all the morning papers (from
the “Morning
Chronicle” downwards to the “Porcupine,”) with the places of their
respective offices, where thou wast meditating to insert, and didst insert, an
elaborate sketch of the story of thy play—stones in thy enemy’s hand to
bruise thee with; and severely wast thou bruised, O Professor! nor do I know
what oil to pour into thy wounds. Next, which convinced me to a dead conviction
of thy pride, violent and almost satanical pride—lay a list of books, which
204 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Dec. |
thy un-tragedy-favoured pocket could never
answer; Dodsley’s Old Plays, Malone’s Shakspeare (still harping upon thy play, thy
philosophy abandoned meanwhile to Christians and superstitious minds); nay, I
believe (if I can believe my memory), that the ambitious Encyclopædia itself
was part of thy meditated acquisitions; but many a playbook was there. All
these visions are damned; and thou, Professor, must read Shakspere in future out of a common edition;
and, hark ye, pray read him to a little better purpose! Last and strongest
against thee (in colours manifest as the hand upon
Belshazzar’s wall), lay a volume of poems by C. Lloyd and C. Lamb.
Thy heart misgave thee, that thy assistant might possibly not have talent
enough to furnish thee an epilogue! Manning, all these
things came over my mind; all the gratulations that would have thickened upon
him, and even some have glanced aside upon his humble friend; the vanity, and
the fame, and the profits (the Professor is £500 ideal money out of pocket by
this failure, besides £2OO he would have got for the copyright, and the
Professor is never much beforehand with the world; what he gets is all by the
sweat of his brow and dint of brain, for the Professor, though a sure man, is
also a slow); and now to muse upon thy altered physiognomy, thy pale and
squalid appearance (a kind of blue sickness about the eyelids), and thy crest
fallen, and thy proud demand of £200 from thy bookseller changed to an
uncertainty of his taking it at all, or giving thee full £50. The Professor has
won my heart by this his mournful catastrophe. You remember Marshall, who dined with him at my house; I
met him in the lobby immediately after the damnation of the Professor’s
play, and he looked to me like an angel: his face was lengthened, and all over sweat; I never saw such a care-fraught
visage; I could have hugged him, I loved him so intensely. “From every
pore of him a perfume fell.” I have seen that man in many
situations, and from my soul I think that a more god-like honest soul exists
not in this world. The Professor’s poor nerves trembling with the recent
shock, he hurried him away to my house to supper; and there we comforted him as
well as we could. He came to consult me about a change of catastrophe; but
alas! the piece was condemned long before that crisis. I at first humoured him
with a specious proposition, but have since joined his true friends in advising
him to give it up. He did it with a pang, and is to print it as his.
Robert Dodsley (1704-1764)
English bookseller, poet, and miscellaneous writer; originally a footman, he was started
in his literary career by Alexander Pope.
William Godwin (1756-1836)
English novelist and political philosopher; author of
An Inquiry
concerning the Principles of Political Justice (1793) and
Caleb
Williams (1794); in 1797 he married Mary Wollstonecraft.
Edmond Malone (1741-1812)
Irish literary scholar; member of Johnson's Literary Club (1782); edited the Works of
Shakespeare (1790) and left substantial materials for the notable variorum Shakespeare, 21
vols (1821).
Thomas Manning (1772-1840)
Educated at Caius College, Cambridge, he traveled in China and Tibet, and was a life-long
friend of Charles Lamb.
James Marshall (d. 1832)
Translator and literary jobber; he was a schoolmate and bosom friend of William Godwin, a
drinking companion of Charles Lamb, and associate of Mary Shelley.
Morning Chronicle. (1769-1862). James Perry was proprietor of this London daily newspaper from 1789-1821; among its many
notable poetical contributors were Coleridge, Southey, Lamb, Rogers, and Campbell.
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.
The True Briton. (1793-1803). A London daily newspaper edited by John Heriot, 1793-1803.