Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to Thomas Manning, 15 February 1802
[No date. ? Feb. 15, 1802.]
NOT a sentence, not a syllable of
Trismegistus, shall be lost through my neglect. I am
his word-banker, his storekeeper of puns and syllogisms. You cannot conceive
(and if Trismegistus
234 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Feb. |
cannot, no man can) the strange joy which I felt
at the receipt of a letter from Paris. It seemed to give me a learned
importance, which placed me above all who had not Parisian correspondents.
Believe that I shall carefully husband every scrap, which will save you the
trouble of memory, when you come back. You cannot write things so trifling, let
them only be about Paris, which I shall not treasure. In particular, I must
have parallels of actors and actresses. I must be told if any building in Paris
is at all comparable to St. Paul’s, which, contrary to the usual mode of
that part of our nature called admiration, I have looked up to with unfading
wonder every morning at ten o’clock, ever since it has lain in my way to
business. At noon I casually glance upon it, being hungry; and hunger has not
much taste for the fine arts. Is any night-walk comparable to a walk from St.
Paul’s to Charing Cross, for lighting and paving, crowds going and coming
without respite, the rattle of coaches and the cheerfulness of shops? Have you
seen a man guillotined yet? is it as good as hanging? are the women all painted, and the men all
monkeys? or are there not a few that look like rational of both sexes? Are you
and the First Consul thick? All this expense of ink I may fairly put you to, as your
letters will not be solely for my proper pleasure, but are to serve as
memoranda and notices, help for short memory, a kind of Rumfordising recollection, for yourself on
your return. Your letter was just what a letter should be, crammed and very
funny. Every part of it pleased me till you came to Paris; and your
damn’d philosophical indolence or indifference stung me. You cannot stir
from your rooms till you know the language! What the devil!—are men nothing but
word-trumpets? are men all tongue and ear? have these creatures, that you and I
profess to know something about, no faces, gestures,
gabble: no folly, no absurdity, no induction of French education upon the
abstract idea of men and women, no similitude nor dissimilitude to English!
Why! thou damn’d Smellfungus! your
account of your landing and reception, and Bullen (I forget how you spell it—it
was spelt my way in Harry the Eighth’s
time,) was exactly in that minute style which strong impressions Inspire
(writing to a Frenchman, I write as a Frenchman would). It appears to me as if
I should die with joy at the first landing in a foreign country. It is the
nearest pleasure, which a grown man can substitute for that unknown one, which
he can never know—the pleasure of the first entrance into life from the womb. I
dare say, in a short time, my habits would come back like a “stronger
man” armed, and drive out that new pleasure; and I should soon sicken for
known objects. Nothing has transpired here that seems to me of sufficient
importance to send dry-shod over the water: but I suppose you will want to be
told some news. The best and the worst to me is, that I have given up two guineas
a week at the “Post,”
and regained my health and spirits, which were upon the wane. I grew sick, and
Stuart unsatisfied. Ludisti satis, tempus abire est; I must
cut closer, that’s all. Mister
Fell—or as you, with your usual facetiousness and drollery, call
him, Mr. F + ll—has stopped short in the middle of his play. Some friend has told him that it has not the least merit in
it. Oh! that I had the rectifying of the Litany! I would put in a libera nos (Scriptores videlicet) ab
amicis! That’s all the news. A propos (is it pedantry, writing to a
Frenchman, to express myself sometimes by a French word, when an English one
would not do as well? methinks, my thoughts fall naturally into it).——
In all this time I have done but one thing, which I reckon
tolerable, and that I will transcribe, because it may give you pleasure, being
a picture of my humours. You will find it in my last page. It absurdly is a
first Number of a series, thus strangled in its birth.
More news! The Professor’s
Rib has come out to be a damn’d disagreeable woman, so
much so as to drive me and some more old cronies from his house. If a man will
keep snakes in his house, he must not wonder if people are shy of coming to see
him because of the snakes.
Apropos, I think you wrong about my play. All the
omissions are right. And the supplementary scene, in which Sandford narrates the manner in which his
master is affected, is the best in the book. It stands where a hodge-podge
of German puerilities used to stand. I insist upon it that you like that
scene. Love me, love that scene. I will now transcribe the “Londoner” (No. 1),
and wind up all with affection and humble servant at the end.
The Londoner. No. 1
In compliance with my own particular humour, no less
than with thy laudable curiosity, Reader, I proceed to give thee some
account of my history and habits. I was born under the nose of St.
Dunstan’s steeple, just where the conflux of the eastern and western
inhabitants of this twofold city meet and justle in friendly opposition at
Temple-bar. The same day which gave me to the world saw London happy in the
celebration of her great annual feast. This I cannot help looking upon as a
lively type or omen of the future great goodwill which I was destined to
bear toward the City, resembling in kind that solicitude which every Chief
Magistrate is supposed to feel for whatever concerns her interests and
well-being. Indeed, I consider myself in some sort a speculative Lord Mayor
of London: for, though circumstances unhappily preclude me from the hope of
ever arriving at the dignity of a gold
236 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Feb. |
chain
and spital sermon, yet thus much will I say of myself, in truth, that
Whittington himself with his Cat (just emblem of vigilance and a furred gown), never went beyond me in affection,
which I bear to the citizens. Shut out from serving them in the most
honourable mode, I aspire to do them benefit in another, scarcely less
honourable; and if I cannot, by virtue of office, commit vice and
irregularity to the material Counter, I will, at
least, erect a spiritual one, where they shall be
laid fast by the heels. In plain words, I will
do my best endeavour to write them down.
To return to myself (from whence
my zeal for the Public good is perpetually causing me to digress), I will
let thee, Reader, into certain more of my peculiarities. I was born (as you
have heard), bred, and have passed most of my time, in a crowd. This has begot in me an entire affection for that way of
life, amounting to an almost insurmountable aversion from solitude and
rural scenes. This aversion was never interrupted or suspended, except for
a few years in the younger part of my life, during a period in which I had
fixed my affections upon a charming young woman. Every man, while the
passion is upon him, is for a time at least addicted to groves and meadows,
and purling streams. During this short period of my existence, I contracted
just enough familiarity with rural objects to understand tolerably well
ever after the Poets, when they declaim in such
passionate terms in favour of a country life.
For my own part, now the fit is
long past, I have no hesitation in declaring, that a mob of happy faces
crowding up at the pit door of Drury-Lane Theatre just at the hour of five,
give me ten thousand finer pleasures, than I ever received from all the
flocks of silly sheep, that have whitened the plains
of Arcadia or Epsom Downs.
This passion for crowds is no where feasted so full as
in London. The man must have a rare recipe for melancholy, who can be dull
in Fleet-street. I am naturally inclined to hypochondria, but in London it vanishes, like all other ills.
Often when I have felt a weariness or distaste at home, have I rushed out
into her crowded Strand, and fed my humour, till tears have wetted my cheek
for inutterable sympathies with the multitudinous moving picture, which she
never fails to present at all hours, like the shifting scenes of a skilful
Pantomime.
The very deformities of London, which give distaste to
others, from habit do not displease me. The endless succession of shops,
where Fancy (miscalled Folly) is supplied with perpetual new gauds and
toys, excite in me no puritanical aversion. I gladly behold every appetite
supplied with its proper food. The obliging customer, and the obliged
tradesmen—things which live by bowing,
and things which exist but for homage, do not
affect me with disgust; from habit I perceive nothing but urbanity, where
other men, more refined, discover meanness. I love the very smoke of
London, because it has been the medium most familiar to my vision. I see
grand principles of honour at work in the dirty ring which encompasses two
combatants with fists, and principles of no less eternal justice in the
tumultuous detectors of a pickpocket. The salutary astonishment with which
an execution is surveyed, convinces me more forcibly than an hundred
volumes of abstract polity, that the universal instinct of man, in all
ages, has leaned to order and good government. Thus an art of extracting
morality, from the commonest incidents of a town life, is attained by the
same well-natured alchemy, with which the Foresters of
Arden in a beautiful country Found tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, Sermons in stones, and good in every thing— |
Where has spleen her food but in London—humour, interest, curiosity,
suck at her measureless breasts without a possibility of being satiated.
Nursed amid her noise, her crowds, her beloved smoke—what have I been doing
all my life, if I have not lent out my heart with usury to such scenes?
Reader, in the course of my peregrinations about the
great city, it is hard, if I have not picked up matter, which may serve to
amuse thee, as it has done me, a winter evening long. When next we meet, I
purpose opening my budget—Till when, farewell.
“What is all this about?” said
Mrs. Shandy. “A story of a
cock and a bull,” said Yorick: and so it is; but Manning will take good-naturedly what God
will send him across the water: only I hope he won’t shut his eyes, and open his mouth, as the
children say, for that is the way to gape, and not
to read. Manning, continue your
laudable purpose of making me your register. I will render back all your
remarks; and I, not you, shall have received usury
by having read them. In the mean time, may the great Spirit have you in his
keeping, and preserve our Englishmen from the inoculation of frivolity and
sin upon French earth.
Allons—or what is it you say,
instead of good-bye?
Mary sends her kind remembrance, and
covets the remarks equally with me.
Ralph Fell (d. 1814)
Improvident writer and friend of William Godwin and Charles Lamb; a native of Yorkshire,
he published
Memoirs of the Public Life of the late Right Honourable
Charles James Fox (1808).
Mary Jane Godwin [née Vial] (1768-1841)
The second wife of William Godwin, whom she married in 1801 after a previous relationship
in which was born her daughter Claire Clairmont (1798-1879). With her husband she was a
London bookseller.
Mary Anne Lamb (1764-1847)
Sister of Charles Lamb with whom she wrote Tales from Shakespeare (1807). She lived with
her brother, having killed their mother in a temporary fit of insanity.
Thomas Manning (1772-1840)
Educated at Caius College, Cambridge, he traveled in China and Tibet, and was a life-long
friend of Charles Lamb.
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Daniel Stuart (1766-1846)
Originally its printer, he was proprietor of the
Morning Post from
1795-1803; in about 1800 he became part-proprietor and editor of
The
Courier.
Benjamin Thompson, Count Rumford (1753-1814)
American-born natural philosopher; a loyalist in the War of Independence he worked as a
civil servant in Britain and later in Bavaria.
Morning Post. (1772-1937). A large-circulation London daily that published verse by many of the prominent poets of
the romantic era. John Taylor (1750–1826), Daniel Stuart (1766-1846), and Nicholas Byrne
(d. 1833) were among its editors.