Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to William Wordsworth, 9 August 1815
[p.m. August 9, 1815.] 9th Aug. 1815.
DEAR Wordsworth, We acknowlege with pride the receit of both your
hand writings, and desire to be ever had in kindly remembrance by you both and
by Dorothy. Miss Hutchinson has just transmitted us a letter containing,
among other chearful matter, the annunciation of a
child born. Nothing of consequence has turned up in our parts
since your departure. Mary and I felt
quite queer after your taking leave (you W. W.) of us in
St. Giles’s. We wishd we had seen more of you, but felt we had scarce
been sufficiently acknowleging for the share we had enjoyed of your company. We
felt as if we had been not enough expressive of our
pleasure. But our manners both are a little too much on
this side of too-much-cordiality. We want presence of mind and presence of
heart. What we feel comes too late, like an after thought impromptu. But
perhaps you observed nothing of that which we have been painfully conscious of,
and are, every day, in our intercourse with those we stand affected to through
all the degrees of love. Robinson is on
the Circuit. Our Panegyrist I thought had forgotten one of the objects of his
youthful admiration, but I was agreeably removed from that scruple by the
laundress knocking at my door this morning almost before I was up, with a
present of fruit from my young friend, &c.—There is something inexpressibly
pleasant to me in these presents. Be it fruit, or fowl,
or brawn, or what not. Books are
a legitimate cause of acceptance. If presents be not the soul of friendship,
undoubtedly they are the most spiritual part of the body of that intercourse.
There is too
470 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | August |
much narrowness of thinking in
this point. The punctilio of acceptance methinks is too confined and
straitlaced. I could be content to receive money, or clothes, or a joint of
meat from a friend; why should he not send me a dinner as well as a dessert? I
would taste him in the beasts of the field, and thro’ all creation.
Therefore did the basket of fruit of the juvenile Talfourd not displease me. Not that I have any thoughts of
bartering or reciprocating these things. To send him any thing in return would
be to reflect suspicion of mercenariness upon what I know he meant a freewill
offering. Let him overcome me in bounty. In this strife a generous nature loves
to be overcome. Alsager (whom you call
Alsinger—and indeed he is rather singer than sager, no reflection upon his
naturals neither) is well and in harmony with himself and the world. I
don’t know how he and those of his constitution keep their nerves so
nicely balanced as they do. Or have they any? or are they made of packthread?
He is proof against weather, ingratitude, meat under done, every weapon of
fate. I have just now a jagged end of a tooth pricking against my tongue, which
meets it half way in a wantonness of provocation, and there they go at it, the
tongue pricking itself like the viper against the file, and the tooth galling
all the gum inside and out to torture, tongue and tooth, tooth and tongue, hard
at it, and I to pay the reckoning, till all my mouth is as hot as brimstone,
and I’d venture the roof of my mouth that at this moment, at which I
conjecture my full-happinessed friend is picking his crackers, not one of the
double rows of ivory in his privileged mouth has as much as a flaw in it, but
all perform their functions, and having performed it expect to be picked
(luxurious steeds!) and rubbed down. I don’t think he could be robbed, or
could have his house set on fire, or ever want money. I have heard him express
a similar opinion of his own impassibility. I keep acting here
Heautontimorumenos. M. Burney has been
to Calais and has come home a travelld Monsieur. He speaks nothing but the
Gallic Idiom. Field is on circuit. So
now I believe I have given account of most that you saw at our Cabin. Have you
seen a curious letter in Morn.
Chron., by C. Ll., the genius
of absurdity, respecting Bonaparte’s
suing out his Habeas Corpus. That man is his own moon. He has no need of
ascending into that gentle planet for mild influences. You wish me some of your
leisure. I have a glimmering aspect, a chink-light of liberty before me, which
I pray God may prove not fallacious. My remonstrances have stirred up others to
remonstrate, and altogether, there is a plan for separating certain parts of
business from our department, which if it take place will produce me more time,
i.e. my evenings free. It may be a means of placing me in a more conspicuous
situation which will knock at my nerves another way, but I wait the issue in submission. If I can
but begin my own day at 4 o Clock in the afternoon, I shall think myself to
have Eden days of peace and liberty to what I have had. As you say, how a man
can fill 3 volumes up with an Essay on the Drama is wonderful. I am sure a very
few sheets would hold all I had to say on the subject, and yet I dare say * * *
* * * * * * * [*] as Von Slagel * * *
Did you ever read Charron on Wisdom? or Patrick’s Pilgrim? if neither, you have two great
pleasures to come. I mean some day to attack Caryl on
Job, six Folios. What any man can write, surely I may read. If I do
but get rid of auditing Warehousekeepers Accts. and get
no worse-harassing task in the place of it, what a Lord of Liberty I shall be.
I shall dance and skip and make mouths at the invisible event, and pick the
thorns out of my pillow and throw ’em at rich men’s night caps, and
talk blank verse, hoity toity, and sing “A Clerk I was in London
Gay,” ban, ban, Ca-Caliban, like the emancipated monster, and go
where I like, up this street or down that ally. Adieu, and pray that it may be
my luck. Good be to you all.
Thomas Massa Alsager (1779-1846)
Journalist and music critic for the
Times; he was the friend of
Leigh Hunt and Thomas Barnes; John Keats was reading Alsager's copy of Chapman's poems when
he wrote the famous sonnet.
Martin Charles Burney (1788-1852)
The son of Admiral James Burney and nephew of Fanny Burney; he was a lawyer on the
western circuit, and a friend of Leigh Hunt, the Lambs, and Hazlitts.
Joseph Caryl (1602-1673)
Educated at Exeter College, Oxford, he was a preacher at Westminster Abbey ejected upon
the Restoration.
Pierre Charron (1541-1603)
French theologian, philosopher, and disciple of Michel Montaigne; he wrote
De la Sagesse (1604).
Barron Field (1786-1846)
English barrister and friend of Leigh Hunt, Thomas Hood, and Charles Lamb.
Sara Hutchinson (1775-1835)
The daughter of John Hutchinson of Penrith (d. 1785) and sister of Mary Hutchinson
Wordsworth.
Thomas Hutchinson (1815-1903)
The son of Thomas Hutchinson and nephew of William Wordsworth; educated at St. John's
College, Cambridge, he was curate of Hentland, Herefordshire (1839-41) and vicar of
Kimbolton, Herefordshire (1841-1903).
Mary Anne Lamb (1764-1847)
Sister of Charles Lamb with whom she wrote Tales from Shakespeare (1807). She lived with
her brother, having killed their mother in a temporary fit of insanity.
Capel Lofft (1751-1824)
English poet, lawyer, and political reformer; he was the patron of the poet Robert
Bloomfield. Charles Lamb described him as “the genius of absurdity.”
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
Henry Crabb Robinson (1775-1867)
Attorney, diarist, and journalist for
The Times; he was a founder
of the Athenaeum Club.
Sir Thomas Noon Talfourd (1795-1854)
English judge, dramatist, and friend of Charles Lamb who contributed articles to the
London Magazine and
New Monthly
Magazine.
Dorothy Wordsworth (1771-1855)
The sister of William Wordsworth who transcribed his poems and kept his house; her
journals and letters were belatedly published after her death.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
Morning Chronicle. (1769-1862). James Perry was proprietor of this London daily newspaper from 1789-1821; among its many
notable poetical contributors were Coleridge, Southey, Lamb, Rogers, and Campbell.