Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to William Wordsworth, [23 September 1816]
[p.m. September 23, 1816.]
MY dear Wordsworth, It seems an age since we have corresponded, but
indeed the interim has been stuffd out with more variety than usually checquers
my same-seeming existence.—Mercy on me, what a traveller have I been since I
wrote you last! what foreign wonders have been explored! I have seen Bath,
King Bladud’s ancient well, fair
Bristol, seed-plot of suicidal Chatterton, Marlbro’, Chippenham, Calne, famous for
nothing in particular that I know of—but such a vertigo of locomotion has not
seized us for years. We spent a month with the Morgans at the last named Borough—August—and such a change has
the change wrought in us that we could not stomach wholesome Temple air, but
are absolutely rusticating (O the gentility of it) at Dalston, about one
mischievous boy’s stone’s throw off Kingsland Turnpike, one mile
from Shoreditch church,—thence we emanate in various directions to Hackney,
Clapton, Totnam, and such like romantic country. That my lungs should ever
prove so dainty as to fancy they perceive differences of air! but so it is,
tho’ I am almost ashamed of it, like Milton’s devil (turn’d truant to his old Brimstone)
I am purging off the foul air of my once darling
tobacco in this Eden, absolutely snuffing up pure
gales, like old worn out Sin playing at being innocent, which never comes
again, for in spite of good books and good thoughts there is something in a
Pipe that virtue cannot give tho’ she give her unendowed person for a
dowry. Have you read the review of Coleridge’s
character, person, physiognomy &c. in the Examiner—his features even to his nose—O
horrible license beyond the old Comedy. He is himself gone to the sea side with
his favorite Apothecary, having left for
publication as I hear a prodigious mass of composition for a Sermon to the middling ranks of people
to persuade them they are not so distressed as is commonly supposed. Methinks
he should recite it to a congregation of Bilston Colliers,—the fate of
Cinna the Poet would instantaneously be
his. God bless him, but certain that rogue-Examiner has beset him in most unmannerly strains. Yet
there is a kind of respect shines thro’ the disrespect that to those who
know the rare compound (that is the subject of it) almost balances the reproof,
but then those who know him but partially or at a distance are so extremely apt
to drop the qualifying part thro’ their fingers. The “after all,
Mr. Wordsworth is a man of great talents, if he
did not abuse them” comes so dim upon the eyes of an Edinbro’ review reader, that
have been gloating-open chuckle-wide upon the preceding detail of abuses, it
scarce strikes the pupil with any consciousness of the letters being there,
like letters writ in lemon. There was a cut at me a few months back by the same hand, but my agnomen or
agni-nomen not being calculated to strike the popular ear, it dropt anonymous,
but it was a pretty compendium of observation, which the author has collected
in my disparagement, from some hundreds of social evenings which we had spent
together,—however in spite of all, there is something tough in my attachment to
H—— which these violent strainings cannot quite
dislocate or sever asunder. I get no conversation in London that is absolutely
worth attending to but his. There is monstrous little sense in the world, or I
am monstrous clever, or squeamish or something, but there is nobody to talk
to—to talk with I should say—and to go talking to
one’s self all day long is too much of a good thing, besides subjecting
one to the imputation of being out of one’s senses, which does no good to
one’s temporal interest at all. By the way, I have seen
Colerge. but once this 3
or 4 months. He is an odd person, when he first comes to town he is quite hot
upon visiting, and then he turns off and absolutely never comes at all, but
seems to forget there are any such people in the world. I made one attempt to
visit him (a morning call) at Highgate, but there was something in him or his
apothecary which I found so unattractively-repulsing from any temptation to
call again, that I stay away as naturally 492 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Sept. |
as a
Lover visits. The rogue gives you Love Powders, and then a strong horse drench
to bring ’em off your stomach that they mayn’t hurt you. I was very
sorry the printing of your Letter was not quite to your mind, but I surely did not think but
you had arranged the manner of breaking the paragraphs from some principle
known to your own mind, and for some of the Errors, I am confident that Note of
Admiration in the middle of two words did not stand so when I had it, it must
have dropt out and been replaced wrong, so odious a blotch could not have
escaped me. Gifford (whom God curse) has
persuaded squinting Murray (whom may God
not bless) not to accede to an offer Field made for me to print 2 vols, of Essays, to include the
one on Hogrth. and 1 or
2 more, but most of the matter to be new, but I dare say I should never have
found time to make them; M. would have had ’em, but
shewed specimens from the Reflector to G——, as he acknowleged to
Field, and Crispin did for me. “Not on his
soal but on his soul, damn’d Jew” may the malediction of my
eternal antipathy light—We desire much to hear from you, and of you all,
including Miss Hutchinson, for not
writing to whom Mary feels a weekly (and
did for a long time feel a daily) Pang. How is Southey?—I hope his pen will continue to move many years
smoothly and continuously for all the rubs of the rogue Examiner. A pertinacious foulmouthed villain it is!
This is written for a rarity at the seat of business: it is
but little time I can generally command from secular calligraphy,—the pen seems
to know as much and makes letters like figures—an obstinate clerkish thing. It
shall make a couplet in spite of its nib before I have done with it,
“and so I end Commending me to your love, my dearest friend.” |
from Leaden Hall, Septemr something, 1816
Thomas Chatterton (1752-1770)
The “marvelous boy” of Bristol, whose forgeries of medieval poetry deceived many and
whose early death by suicide came to epitomize the fate neglected genius.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
Barron Field (1786-1846)
English barrister and friend of Leigh Hunt, Thomas Hood, and Charles Lamb.
William Gifford (1756-1826)
Poet, scholar, and editor who began as a shoemaker's apprentice; after Oxford he
published
The Baviad (1794),
The Maeviad
(1795), and
The Satires of Juvenal translated (1802) before becoming
the founding editor of the
Quarterly Review (1809-24).
James Gillman (1782-1839)
The Highgate surgeon with whom Coleridge lived from 1816 until his death in 1834; in 1838
he published an incomplete
Life of Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
English essayist and literary critic; author of
Characters of
Shakespeare's Plays (1817),
Lectures on the English Poets
(1818), and
The Spirit of the Age (1825).
Sara Hutchinson (1775-1835)
The daughter of John Hutchinson of Penrith (d. 1785) and sister of Mary Hutchinson
Wordsworth.
Mary Anne Lamb (1764-1847)
Sister of Charles Lamb with whom she wrote Tales from Shakespeare (1807). She lived with
her brother, having killed their mother in a temporary fit of insanity.
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
John James Morgan (d. 1820)
Bristol businessman and classmate of Robert Southey; Coleridge lived with the Morgans in
Hammersmith 1810-16; after losing his fortune late in life Morgan retired to Calne.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
The Examiner. (1808-1881). Founded by John and Leigh Hunt, this weekly paper divided its attention between literary
matters and radical politics; William Hazlitt was among its regular contributors.