Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to Mary Wordsworth, 18 February 1818
18 feb. 1818. East India House.
(Mary shall send you all the news, which I find I have left
out.)
MY dear Mrs.
Wordsworth, I have repeatedly taken pen in hand to answer your
kind letter. My sister should more properly have done it, but she having
failed, I consider myself answerable for her debts. I am now trying to do it in
the midst of Commercial noises, and with a quill which seems more ready to
glide into arithmetical figures and names of Goods, Cassia, Cardemoms, Aloes,
Ginger, Tea, than into kindly responses and friendly recollections.
The reason why I cannot write letters at home is, that I am
never alone. Plato’s (I write to
W. W. now)
Plato’s double animal parted never longed [?
more] to be reciprocally reunited in the system of its first creation, than I
sometimes do to be but for a moment single and separate. Except my
morning’s walk to the office, which is like treading on sands of gold for
that reason, I am never so. I cannot walk home from office but some officious
friend offers his damn’d unwelcome courtesies to accompany me. All the
morning I am pestered. I could sit and gravely cast up sums in great Books, or
compare sum with sum, and write Paid against this
and Unp’d against t’other, and yet
reserve in some “corner of my mind” some darling thoughts all my
own—faint memory of some passage in a Book—or the tone of an absent
friend’s Voice—a snatch or Miss
Burrell’s singing—a gleam of Fanny Kelly’s divine plain face—The two operations might
be going on at the same time without thwarting, as the sun’s two motions
(earth’s I mean), or as I sometimes turn round till I am giddy, in my
back parlour, while my sister is walking longitudinally in the front—or as the
shoulder of veal twists round with the spit, while the smoke wreathes up the
chimney—but there are a set of amateurs of the Belle Lettres—the gay
science—who come to me as a sort of rendezvous, putting questions of criticism,
of British Institutions, Lalla Rooks
&c., what Coleridge said at the
Lecture last night—who have the form of reading men, but, for any possible use
Reading can be to them but to talk of, might as well have been Ante-Cadmeans
born, or have lain sucking out the sense of an Egyptn.
hieroglyph as long as the Pyramids will last before they
1818 | EVENING HARASSMENTS | 511 |
should find it. These pests worrit me at business
and in all its intervals, perplexing my accounts, poisoning my little salutary
warming-time at the fire, puzzling my paragraphs if I take a newspaper,
cramming in between my own free thoughts and a column of figures which had come
to an amicable compromise but for them. Their noise ended, one of them, as I
said, accompanys me home lest I should be solitary for a moment; he at length
takes his welcome leave at the door, up I go, mutton on table, hungry as
hunter, hope to forget my cares and bury them in the agreeable abstraction of
mastication, knock at the door, in comes Mrs.
Hazlitt, or M. Burney, or
Morgan, or Demogorgon, or my
brother, or somebody, to prevent my
eating alone, a Process absolutely necessary to my poor wretched digestion. O
the pleasure of eating alone!—eating my dinner alone! let me think of it. But
in they come, and make it absolutely necessary that I should open a bottle of
orange—for my meat turns into stone when any one dines with me, if I have not
wine—wine can mollify stones. Then that wine turns into acidity, acerbity,
misanthropy, a hatred of my interrupters (God bless ’em! I love some of
’em dearly), and with the hatred a still greater aversion to their going
away. Bad is the dead sea they bring upon me, choaking and death-doing, but
worse is the deader dry sand they leave me on if they go before bed time. Come
never, I would say to these spoilers of my dinner, but if you come, never go.
The fact is, this interruption does not happen very often, but every time it
comes by surprise that present bane of my life, orange wine, with all its
dreary stifling consequences, follows. Evening Company I should always like had
I any mornings, but I am saturated with human faces (divine forsooth) and voices all the golden morning, and five evenings
in a week would be as much as I should covet to be in company, but I assure you
that is a wonderful week in which I can get two, or one, to myself. I am never
C. L. but always C. L. and Co.
He, who thought it not good for man to be alone, preserve me
from the more prodigious monstrosity of being never by myself. I forget bed
time, but even there these sociable frogs clamber up to annoy me. Once a week,
generally some singular evening that, being alone, I go to bed at the hour I
ought always to be abed, just close to my bedroom window, is the club room of a
public house, where a set of singers, I take them to be chorus-singers of the
two theatres (it must be both of them), begin their orgies. They are a set of
fellows (as I conceive) who being limited by their talents to the burthen of
the song at the play houses, in revenge have got the common popular airs by
Bishop or some cheap composer
arranged for choruses, that is, to be sung all in chorus. At least I never can
catch any of the text of the plain song,
512 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Feb. |
nothing
but the Babylonish choral howl at the tail on’t. “That fury
being quenchd”—the howl I mean—a curseder burden succeeds, of
shouts and clapping and knocking of the table. At length over tasked nature
drops under it and escapes for a few hours into the society of the sweet silent
creatures of Dreams, which go away with mocks and mows at cockcrow. And then I
think of the words Christobel’s
father used (bless me, I have dipt in the wrong ink) to say every morning by
way of variety when he awoke—“Every knell, the Baron saith, Wakes us
up to a world of death,” or something like it. All I mean by this
senseless interrupted tale is, that by my central situation I am a little over
companied. Not that I have any animosity against the good creatures that are so
anxious to drive away the Harpy solitude from me. I like ’em, and cards,
and a chearful glass, but I mean merely to give you an idea between office
confinement and after office society, how little time I can call my own. I mean
only to draw a picture, not to make an inference. I would not that I know of
have it otherwise. I only wish sometimes I could exchange some of my faces and
voices for the faces and voices which a late visitation brought most welcome
and carried away leaving regret, but more pleasure, even a kind of gratitude,
at being so often favored with that kind northern visitation. My London faces
and noises don’t hear me—I mean no disrespect—or I should explain myself
that instead of their return 220 times a year and the return of W. W. &c. 7 times in 104 weeks, some more
equal distribution might be found. I have scarce room to put in Mary’s kind love and my poor name
This to be read last.
W. H. goes on lecturing against
W. W. and making copious use of
quotations from said W. W. to give a zest to said
lectures. S. T. C. is lecturing with
success. I have not heard either him or H. but I dined
with S. T. C. at Gilman’s a Sunday or 2 since and he was well and in
good spirits. I mean to hear some of the course, but lectures are not much
to my taste, whatever the Lecturer may be. If read,
they are dismal flat, and you can’t think why you are brought
together to hear a man read his works which you could read so much better
at leisure yourself; if delivered extempore, I am always in pain lest the
gift of utterance should suddenly fail the orator in the middle, as it did
me at the dinner given in honor of me at the London Tavern.
“Gentlemen” said I, and there I stoppt,—the rest my feelings
were under the necessity of supplying. Mrs.
Wordsworth will go on, kindly
haunting us with visions of seeing the lakes once more
which never can be realized. Between us there is
a great gulf—not of inexplicable moral antipathies and distances, I hope
(as there seemd to be between me and that Gentleman concern’d in the Stamp office that I so
strangely coiled up from at Haydons). I think I had an instinct that he was the head of an
office. I hate all such people—Accountants, Deputy Accountants. The dear
abstract notion of the East India Company, as long as she is unseen, is
pretty, rather Poetical; but as she makes
herself manifest by the persons of such Beasts, I loathe and detest her as
the Scarlet what-do-you-call-her of Babylon. I thought, after abridging us
of all our red letter days, they had done their worst, but I was deceived
in the length to which Heads of offices, those true Liberty haters, can go.
They are the tyrants, not Ferdinand,
nor Nero—by a decree past this week, they
have abridged us of the immemorially-observed custom of going at one
o’clock of a Saturday, the little shadow of a holiday left us. Blast
them. I speak it soberly. Dear W. W., be thankful for
your Liberty.
We have spent two very pleasant Evenings lately with
Mr. Monkhouse.
Sir Henry Rowley Bishop (1786-1855)
Musical director at Vauxhall Gardens (1830-33) and professor at the Royal Academy of
Music; he produced operatic settings of texts by Shakespeare and Walter Scott.
Martin Charles Burney (1788-1852)
The son of Admiral James Burney and nephew of Fanny Burney; he was a lawyer on the
western circuit, and a friend of Leigh Hunt, the Lambs, and Hazlitts.
Fanny Burrell (1795-1819 fl.)
An English singer admired by Charles Lamb; she married a Mr. T. Gould before 1817.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
King Ferdinand VII of Spain (1784-1833)
The son of Charles IV, king of Spain; after his father's abdication and the defeat of the
French in the Peninsular War he ruled Spain from 1813 to 1833.
James Gillman (1782-1839)
The Highgate surgeon with whom Coleridge lived from 1816 until his death in 1834; in 1838
he published an incomplete
Life of Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
Benjamin Robert Haydon (1786-1846)
English historical painter and diarist who recorded anecdotes of romantic writers and the
physiognomy of several in his paintings.
Sarah Hazlitt [née Stoddart] (1774-1840)
The daughter of John Stoddart (1742-1803), lieutenant in the Royal Navy; she married
William Hazlitt in 1808 and was divorced in 1822.
William Hazlitt (1778-1830)
English essayist and literary critic; author of
Characters of
Shakespeare's Plays (1817),
Lectures on the English Poets
(1818), and
The Spirit of the Age (1825).
Frances Maria Kelly (1790-1882)
English actress and singer at Drury Lane and elsewhere; Charles Lamb proposed marriage
and later wrote an essay about her (“Barbara S”) in the
London
Magazine (1825).
John Kingston (1780 c.-1839)
The son of John Kingston, MP; educated at Eton and St. John's College, Cambridge, he was
Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1819) and a friend of Horace Smith.
John Lamb Jr. (1763-1821)
The elder brother of Charles Lamb; educated at Christ's Hospital, he was an accountant
with the East India Company.
Mary Anne Lamb (1764-1847)
Sister of Charles Lamb with whom she wrote Tales from Shakespeare (1807). She lived with
her brother, having killed their mother in a temporary fit of insanity.
Thomas Monkhouse (1783-1825)
A London merchant and cousin of Mary and Sarah Hutchinson; he was a friend of William
Wordsworth and Charles Lamb.
John James Morgan (d. 1820)
Bristol businessman and classmate of Robert Southey; Coleridge lived with the Morgans in
Hammersmith 1810-16; after losing his fortune late in life Morgan retired to Calne.
Nero, emperor of Rome (37-68)
Roman emperor (54-68) who made Christians scapegoats for the disastrous fire of 64
AD.
Plato (427 BC-327 BC)
Athenian philosopher who recorded the teachings of his master Socrates in a series of
philosophical dialogues.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.