DEAR B. B.—I am ashamed at not acknowledging your kind little poem, which I must needs like much, but I protest I thought I had done it at the moment. Is it possible a letter has miscarried? Did you get one in which I sent you an extract from the poems of Lord Sterling? I should wonder if you did, for I sent you none such.—There was an incipient lye strangled in the birth. Some people’s conscience is so tender! But in plain truth I thank you very much for the verses. I have a very kind letter from the Laureat, with a self-invitation to come and shake hands with me. This is truly handsome and noble. ’Tis worthy of my old idea of Southey. Shall not I, think you, be covered with a red suffusion?
You are too much apprehensive of your complaint. I know
many that are always ailing of it, and live on to a good old age. I know a
merry fellow (you partly know him) who when his Medical Adviser told him he had
drunk away all that part, congratulated himself (now his liver was gone) that
he should be the longest Liver of the two. The best way in these cases is to
keep yourself as ignorant as you can—as ignorant as the world was before
Galen—of the entire inner construction
of the Animal Man—not to be conscious of a midriff—to hold kidneys (save of
sheep and swine) to be an agreeable fiction—not to know whereabout the gall
grows—to account the circulation of the blood an idle whimsey of Harvey’s—
630 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | Dec. |
I protest I cannot answer thy Sister’s kind enquiry, but I judge I shall put forth no second volume. More praise than buy, and T. and H. are not particularly disposed for Martyrs.
Thou wilt see a funny passage, and yet a true History, of George Dyer’s Aquatic Incursion, in the next “London.” Beware his fate, when thou comest to see me at my Colebrook Cottage. I have filled my little space with my little thoughts. I wish thee ease on thy sofa, but not too much indulgence on it. From my poor desk, thy fellow-sufferer this bright November,