Works of Charles and Mary Lamb. VI-VII. Letters
Charles Lamb to Bernard Barton, [1 December 1824]
DEAR B. B.—If
Mr. Mitford will send me a full and
circumstantial description of his desired vases, I will transmit the same to a
Gentleman resident at Canton, whom I think I have
interest enough in to take the proper care for
their execution. But Mr. M. must have patience. China is a
great way off, further perhaps than he thinks; and his next year’s roses
must be content to wither in a Wedgewood pot. He will please to say whether he
should like his Arms upon them, &c. I send herewith some patterns which
suggest themselves to me at the first blush of the subject, but he will
probably consult his own taste after all. [Figure] The last pattern is
obviously fitted for ranunculuses only. The two former may indifferently hold
daisies, marjoram, sweet williams, and that sort. My friend in Canton is
Inspector of Teas, his name Ball; and I
can think of no better tunnel. I shall expect Mr.
M.’s decision.
Taylor and Hessey finding their magazine goes off very heavily at 2s. 6d.
are prudently going to raise their price another shilling; and having already
more authors than they want, intend to increase the number of them. If they set
up against the New Monthly, they
must change their present hands. It is not tying the dead carcase of a Review
to a half-dead Magazine will do their business. It is like G. D. multiplying his volumes to make ’em
sell better. When he finds one will not go off, he publishes two; two stick, he
tries three; three hang fire, he is confident that four will have a better
chance.
And now, my dear Sir, trifling apart, the gloomy
catastrophe of yesterday morning prompts a sadder vein. The fate of the
unfortunate Fauntleroy makes me, whether
I will or no, to cast reflecting eyes around on such of my friends as by a
parity of situation are exposed to a similarity of temptation. My very style,
seems to myself to become more impressive than usual, with the change of theme.
Who that standeth, knoweth but he may yet fall? Your hands as yet, I am most
willing to believe, have never deviated into others’ property. You think
it impossible that you could ever commit so heinous an offence. But so thought
Fauntleroy once; so have thought many besides him, who
at last have expiated, as he hath done. You are as yet upright. But you are a
Banker, at least the next thing to it. I feel the delicacy of the subject; but
cash must pass thro’ your hands, sometimes to a great amount.
664 | LETTERS OF C. AND M. LAMB | 1824 |
If in an unguarded hour—— but I will hope
better. Consider the scandal it will bring upon those of your persuasion.
Thousands would go to see a Quaker hanged, that would be indifferent to the
fate of a Presbyterian, or an Anabaptist. Think of the effect it would have on
the sale of your poems alone; not to mention higher considerations. I tremble,
I am sure, at myself, when I think that so many poor victims of the Law at one
time of their life made as sure of never being hanged as I in my presumption am
too ready to do myself. What are we better than they? Do we come into the world
with different necks? Is there any distinctive mark under our left ears? Are we
unstrangulable? I ask you. Think of these things. I am shocked sometimes at the
shape of my own fingers, not for their resemblance to the ape tribe (which is
something) but for the exquisite adaptation of them to the purposes of picking,
fingering, &c. No one that is so framed, I maintain it, but should tremble.
Postscript for your Daughter’s eyes only.
Dear Miss—Your pretty little letterets make me
ashamed of my great straggling coarse handwriting. I wonder where you get pens
to write so small. Sure they must be the pinions of a small wren, or a robin.
If you write so in your Album, you must give us glasses to read by. I have seen
a Lady’s similar book all writ in following fashion. I think it pretty
and fanciful.
“O how I love in early dawn To bend my steps o’er flowery dawn
[lawn],” |
which I think has an agreeable variety to the eye. Which I recommend to
your notice, with friend Elia’s best wishes.
Samuel Ball (1781 c.-1874)
Educated with Charles Lamb at Christ's Hospital, he was an authority on Chinese Tea
employed by the East India Company. He was a member of the Athenaeum Club.
Bernard Barton (1784-1849)
Prolific Quaker poet whose verse appeared in many of the literary annuals; he was an
acquaintance of Charles Lamb.
Lucy Barton (1808 c.-1898)
The daughter of the Quaker poet Bernard Barton; she married the poet Edward Fitzgerald in
1856, but they soon separated. She published religious works.
George Dyer (1755-1841)
English poet, antiquary, and friend of Charles Lamb; author of
Poems
and Critical Essays (1802),
Poetics: or a Series of Poems and
Disquisitions on Poetry, 2 vols (1812),
History of the
University and Colleges of Cambridge, 2 vols (1814) and other works.
Henry Fauntleroy (1784-1824)
English banker who embezzled spectacular sums and after a very public trial was hung at
Newgate Prison before a crowd estimated at 100,000.
James Augustus Hessey (1785-1870)
London publisher in partnership with John Taylor; they published the London Magazine from
1821 to 1825.
John Mitford (1781-1859)
Educated at Oriel College, Oxford, he was rector of Benhall in Suffolk, a friend of
Charles Lamb and Samuel Rogers. He was a book collector and editor of the
Gentleman's Magazine (1834-50).
John Taylor (1781-1864)
Publisher of the
London Magazine and poems of John Keats, and a
prolific writer in his own right.
New Monthly Magazine. (1814-1884). Founded in reaction to the radically-inclined
Monthly Magazine,
the
New Monthly was managed under the proprietorship of Henry
Colburn from 1814 to 1845. It was edited by Thomas Campbell and Cyrus Redding from
1821-1830.