LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Reminiscences of a Literary Life
CHAP. XI
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

INTRODUCTION
PREFACE
CONTENTS
CHAP. I
SHELLEY
CHAP. II
JOHN KEATS
THOMAS CAMPBELL
CHAP. III
GEORGE DOUGLAS
CHAP. IV
WILLIAM STEWART ROSE
CHAP. V
SAMUEL ROGERS
SAMUEL COLERIDGE
CHAP. VI
HARTLEY COLERIDGE
CHAP. VII
THOMAS MOORE
WILLIAM LISLE BOWLES
CHAP. VIII
THOMAS DE QUINCEY
JAMES MATHIAS
CHAP. IX
MISS MARTINEAU
WILLIAM GODWIN
CHAP. X
LEIGH HUNT
THOMAS HOOD
HORACE SMITH
‣ CHAP. XI
SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH
MRS. JAMESON
JANE AND ANNA PORTER
CHAP. XII
TOM GENT
CHAP. XIII
VISCOUNT DILLON
SIR LUMLEY SKEFFINGTON
JOHN HOOKHAM FRERE
CHAP. XIV
LORD DUDLEY
LORD DOVER
CHAP. XV
SIR THOMAS LAWRENCE
WILLIAM BROCKEDON
CHAP. XVI
SIR ROBERT PEEL
SPENCER PERCEVAL
CHAP. XVII
MOUNTSTUART ELPHINSTONE
MR. DAVIS
CHAP. XVIII
ELIJAH BARWELL IMPEY
CHAP. XIX
ALEXANDER I.
GEORGE CANNING
NAPOLEON
QUEEN HORTENSE
ROSSINI
CHAP. XX
COUNT PECCHIO
MAZZINI
COUNT NIEMCEWITZ
CHAP. XXI
CARDINAL RUFFO
CHAP. XXII
PRINCESS CAROLINE
BARONNE DE FEUCHÈRES
CHAP. XXIII
SIR SIDNEY SMITH
CHAP. XXIV
SIR GEORGE MURRAY
CHAP. XXV
VISCOUNT HARDINGE
CHAP. XXVI
REV. C. TOWNSEND
CHAP. XXVII
BEAU BRUMMELL
CHAP. XXVIII
AN ENGLISH MERCHANT
THE BRUNELS
APPENDIX
INDEX
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
CHAPTER XI
SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH

A writer in the Quarterly Review has called Sir James the “most accomplished and the most ill-used man of the Whig party.” He was all that. Not one of them could come near him in accomplishment, or in political knowledge, or in political wisdom. The Recordership of Bombay was but poor promotion; and afterwards, though with all the patronage of the State in their hands for years, he never obtained from the Whigs any higher, or indeed any other, employment. It is difficult to conceive how he could have been worse used. They might easily have made some proper provision for him on their advent to power in 1830, and they could have done so almost any day between this period and that of his decease. Was it that Mackintosh was but half a Whig, or, if a whole Whig, then the most measured, most moderate of them all? Many years before the Reform Bill agitation, Mackintosh had come to the conviction, and had openly proclaimed it, that the parliamentary franchise might be too much extended—that a mob could never govern a mob.

I first met Sir James at Mr. Henry Brougham’s, in the spring, or rather the early summer, of 1829. I saw him rather frequently between that time and the beginning of 1833, when I went down to Scotland, and I would now gratefully bear testimony to his engaging simplicity of manners, his goodness of heart, his exceeding great kindness to young men of
110SIR JAMES MACKINTOSH [CHAP. XI
letters, for whom he had always a word of encouragement, and very often a word of excellent advice. He gave me some valuable hints on “La maniere d’écrire l’histoire,” as the
Abbé Mably called it. I heartily wish that my time and abilities could have enabled me to profit more by his suggestions, but my historical labours have been a sort of travail forcé; I have nearly always had to write against time, to feed the Press month by month, or even week by week.

In all his latter years Sir James was in straitened circumstances, and frequently in pecuniary difficulties; beset by creditors in a way that to any man of feeling, or to any man who had a respect for virtue and genius, it was quite painful to witness or to hear of. He might have obtained a great deal more money from the booksellers; but though he was so fluent and quick in talk, I believe he was rather slow with the pen; and then his attention was distracted and so much of his time occupied by politics, by society, of which he was always fond, by the London University, and by other concerns and concernments, that he could have had but a limited leisure for literature.

He was always exceedingly gentle, patient, and polite with his duns; and had, though in a rather different manner, some successes in this way that Sheridan himself might have envied; but he did not like to see them come to his private house in Portland Place, and he used to make appointments with them at a Life Insurance Office, of which he was an actuary, and from which he received an inconsiderable annual stipend. It was not always when they called that he had the money to satisfy them; and I was told that in these cases he would slip out at a back door, as they were about to charge in at the front. I will not answer for this, but I well remember a mot of Lord Alvanley’s: “Every gentleman in money difficulties ought to live in St. James’s
CHAP. XI]MRS. JAMESON AND CRAIK111
Place, on the left-hand side as you go up; not because two rich bankers, and one of them a banker-poet, live there, but because the houses have a back door, and a free issue into the Park.” The two bankers were old
Sam Rogers, and Lubbock, who lived within a door or two of each other.

MRS. JAMESON

I liked Mrs. Jameson, and have always considered her one of the best of our living authoresses. She generally writes upon subjects she well understands, and her various books about art and artists are likely to last. But Mrs. Jameson, though very fond of admiration, had never much personal beauty. At a soirée, she went and sat near my friend George Lillie Craik, who was turning over a portfolio of drawings and engravings. Except in one particular, I should not rank Craik among my absent-minded friends. He was distrait only in omnibuses, and in finding his way. He could seldom get from his cottage at Old Brompton to ours at Friern Barnet without committing some blunder or other. Generally, at our dinner hour, he would find himself at Tottenham, or Edmonton, or Enfield, or Ponder’s End, or some other place five or six miles off, and with no cross-country conveyance. He had to change buses at the Angel at Islington; he usually got into the wrong one, fell a-thinking or talking, and took no notice of the road he was travelling. But in all other matters, Craik, for a Lowland Scotsman, was a smart, brisk, ready-witted fellow. He must have seen Mrs. Jameson scores of times, and must have known her freckled complexion, and the ardent colour of her hair. They came upon a portrait of Mary, Queen of Scots. Mrs. Jameson waxed eloquent on the beauty of the poor Queen. “I believe,” said Craik, in his. quiet way, “it is now
112MRS. JAMESON [CHAP. XI
said we have no authentic portrait of Mary. I suppose she must have been beautiful, as it is asserted by so many of her contemporaries; and yet, I hardly know; I can’t conceive a beautiful woman with red hair; and we are told that Mary was red-haired.” He looked up from the picture, and saw the red locks of Mrs. Jameson, who presently beat a retreat. “I could have bitten off my tongue,” said he, “but I had said my say, and could not unsay it.”

When this authoress wrote her dismal book about Italy, entitled, “Diary of an Ennuyée,” she was a spinster, living as governess with an English family at Rome, and she was quite desperately in love with Beau Cradock, Lord Howden; who, at that time, was as handsome as the Antinous, and as graceful as the Belvedere Apollo. Poor Cradock, who was never much of a coxcomb, admired her for her vivacity, talent, and eloquence; but he could hardly go farther, and so the demoiselle was sadder than Corinne.

Jameson, who became her husband years after this hopeless amour, had been a schoolfellow with poor dear Hartley Coleridge, who always spoke of him as a good fellow, and as a man of real original genius, who might have done a good deal in literature if he had tried. The common rule, that a very clever husband and a very clever wife seldom agree or live happily together, found no exception in this case. He obtained some Government appointment out in Canada; she remained at home, to write books, and to take care of her old father, a miniature painter by profession, whose sight had failed him. And nobly did she discharge her filial duty, and hard did she work that her father might know no want and miss no comfort. For this, even if her books should be forgotten, let her name be honoured, and let her be enshrined with Southey and other heroes in domestic life.

I think it was about the year 1840 that I was told she had gone out to Canada, to be reconciled to her
CHAP. XI]THE MISSES PORTER113
long-absent husband. To Canada she certainly went, for she came home and wrote a book about it, which might have been a better book if she had stayed a little longer.

MISS JANE AND MISS ANNA MARIA PORTER

I liked these two sisters exceedingly, although they were authoresses. I made the acquaintance of their brother, Sir Robert Ker Porter, the traveller, artist, diplomatist, and author, in 1829, at a house in Bolton Row, and was much pleased with him and some lively accounts he gave of society in Russia. The sisters I did not meet until 1830 or 1831, when they were staying with my friend William Mackinnon, M.P., at Hyde Park Place, just opposite Cumberland Gate. They were quiet, perfectly unaffected, rather retiring, very ladylike elderly ladies, neat and plain in their attire, and taking no pains to conceal the snow which Time was throwing on their hair. Jane, the elder sister, had still a good figure, was tall, and must have been rather handsome; Anna Maria was shorter and fairer. I should think she could never have had any pretension to personal beauty, but the expression of her countenance was gentleness and sweetness itself.

There was nothing blue, nothing of the précieuse, or professional authoress, about either of them, and I have seen them sensitively shrink at any allusion to their works, and almost run out of the room from an explosion of compliment and praise. One night, at rather a numerous party at my brother Highlander’s, I saw their sensitiveness put to a severe test by old Sotheby the poet and translator, commonly called “Old Botherby.”

Mackinnon had introduced him to the sisters. Addressing Anna Maria, who looked the elder of the two, he said in his peculiarly unctuous manner:
114JANE AND ANNA PORTER [CHAP. XI
“Miss Porter, I think I have the honour of making my bow to the authoress of ‘
The Scottish Chiefs.’” “No, sir,” said Anna Maria, with a slight blush, “that work was written by my sister Jane.” “Then,” said old Botherby, turning to Jane, and grasping her fingers, “I have the honour of shaking hands with the writer of the best and grandest historical romance that ever was or that ever will be written!”

Miss Jane reddened, and could say nothing; but when Sotheby went off at a tangent to explode to some other literary lion or lioness, she whispered, “How absurd! How can that old gentleman expect one to be flattered by such outrageous compliments, or expect that one can bear such things said to one’s face?”

Old Botherby was soon back to our corner of the drawing-room. I fancy he had been collecting information, for he told Anna Maria that she had written “The Hungarian Brothers,” and that that romance was, in its way, as admirable, as unrivalled, as perfect, as “The Scottish Chiefs.” The poor little authoress winced, and when old Sotheby was again gone, she said she had rather never go into society at all than be frequently exposed to such assaults.

The last years of Miss Porter were saddened by domestic losses. Shortly before I met her she had lost her aged mother, and within a twelvemonth of that time poor Anna Maria died. In 1842 Miss Porter accompanied her brother to St. Petersburg, and he was suddenly carried off by apoplexy as they were on the point of returning to England.

Jane survived until 1850, when she ended her days at Bristol, at the good old age of seventy-four. I did not see her after 1833, but I was told, and can well believe it, that she was patient, amiable, and even cheerful to the last, and that her intellect was in no way affected by age. It was a remarkable and
CHAP. XI]THE MISSES PORTER115
exemplary family. The father, surgeon in the 6th or Enniskillen Dragoons, left them early orphans; yet by their industry, perseverance, and ability, they struggled on to comfortable positions in life, and to something more, for they gained the friendship of many of the best and most distinguished of their contemporaries.

Though not so old as was Botherby, when he paid his compliments, I should not like again to peruse the whole of either “The Scottish Chiefs” or “The Hungarian Brothers”; but I still remember the exquisite delight with which I read these works and other romances by the same writers, in the days of my boyhood, and I still think them pleasant and even improving reading for young people.

In this generation, young men, and young women too, appear to be getting rather too fond of realities, and much too indifferent to romance and sentiment. Too much romance is bad. Granted; but so is too much stern reality or worldly calculation. The hearts and intellects of young people will not be much elevated or improved by constant delineations of the weaknesses, absurdities, follies, and crimes of everyday life. We ought, at least now and then, to give them more generous, more glowing, more ideal pictures; and set up the heroes and heroines of our tales on the pedestal of romance, in a purer atmosphere. The danger now is, not that our sons and daughters will become too romantic, but that they will become too worldly, material, and selfish, and too apt to take mere Cockney or provincial slang for wit and humour. With only a few modifications, and one or two additional acquirements, another Jane and another Anna Maria Porter would not be misplaced in England, in the year 1856.

Jane, as we have seen, ended her days at Bristol; Anna Maria died in the neighbourhood of that city, at Montpelier, the residence of Mrs. Colonel Booth. Mother and daughters had resided at Thames Ditton;
116JANE AND ANNA PORTER [CHAP. XI
but afterwards, and for a much longer period, they occupied a pretty cottage at Esher, close to Claremont. On their account, all the three places ought to have an additional interest in the eye of the visitor. “It was a family of love,” said a very old friend, “and for many years that cottage at Esher was an Elysium.”

≪ PREV NEXT ≫