Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron
Chapter XXVI.
|
LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. |
285 |
CHAPTER XXVI.
Victory! Victory. Austria, Russia, England,
And that tame serpent, that poor shadow, France,
Cry peace, and that means death, when monarchs speak.
|
When the Muses deserted Parnassus, the Klephtes, i. e. outlaws, took possession of their haunts, and kept alive the
love of freedom and the use of arms. They were the only Greeks I found with any sense of
honour; they kept their words and fulfilled their engagements; I protected and fed their
families, and they escorted me in all my expeditions; I was continually in their power, yet
they never attempted to betray me. The Klephtes were the only efficient soldiers at the
commencement of the insurrection; and their leaders maintained the war for three years, so
successfully that the Greek government were enabled to borrow money. The government then
resolved to divide the forces of the Klephtes, to appoint their own partisans as leaders,
and to conduct the war themselves; they raised forces and
imprisoned the former military leaders, wasted time in disputing about their plans of
campaigns, and the nomination of the commissioners to see that they were carried out. In
two scientific campaigns carried on by civilians, the Greeks lost all the territory the
former arbitrary chiefs had won; and of the foreign loan, 2,800,000l., there remained only five shillings in bad money at the close of those campaigns.
If there had been any place of refuge, the insurrection would have ended by the flight of
the leaders and submission of the people. The members of the government sent away the money
they had embezzled, and the primates and other rich rascals attempted to escape with their
families, but they were stopped by the populace.
Greece was reconquered; the vanquished Christians sat in sullen groups
round the walls of their only remaining fortress in the Morea; death, or to resume the
Moslem’s chains, their only alternative. At this critical period a messenger arrived
from Navarino, proclaiming, in the words of our great poet,
“News, friends; our wars are done, the Turks are drowned.” |
The people now sprang up frantic with joy.
|
LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. |
287 |
For six years all the Christian states had been standing looking on at the
bloodiest insurrection on record, sympathising with the unbelieving Ottomans. At the
twelfth hour, the three great maritime Leviathans turned round, and, falling unexpectedly
upon their ancient allies, annihilated them.
The policy of the crafty Muscovite is intelligible. He wanted to possess
Greece and cripple his natural enemy, the Turk. He did both at little cost; the Ottoman
fleet was destroyed, and Greece converted from a Turkish into a Russian Hospodariat. The
policy of France and England is inexplicable; it is one of those inscrutable diplomatic
mysteries devised by heaven-born ministers, which men of women born cannot comprehend.
From the beginning to the end of the insurrection in Greece, Commodore Rowan Hamilton and Colonel C. J. Napier were the only English officers in command who acted
justly and generously to the Greeks. Sir Thomas
Maitland, and his successor, Sir Frederick
Adams, High Commissioners of the Ionian Islands, from their natural sympathy
with tyranny, favoured the Turks on all occasions. Napier was
high-minded and independent in his
opinions, which is always a
disqualification in the eyes of officials. His general popularity and superior influence
with the Ionians mortified Sir Frederick Adams excessively; he did all
he could in his official capacity to thwart Napier; he gave vent to
his rancour in the most trivial matters; he even sent an official letter to
Napier on the impropriety of his wearing moustachios. The Colonel
was very much amused at this despatch; he instantly obeyed the mandate by cutting them off,
and enclosing them in his reply to the Lord High Commissioner, who, no doubt, forwarded
this important correspondence, with the enclosure, to the Commander-in-Chief. If these
emblems of war are preserved amongst the trophies at the Horse Guards, the hair may be used
as the lion’s beard is by the Indians—they burn it, and swallow the ashes,
believing it will give them the strength and courage of the lion.
It was particularly revolting to the mind as well as feelings of Napier, to witness the war as waged in
Greece,—without a plan, combination, system or leader; every man frantic with
excitement to kill and plunder on his own account. Napier, as I have
| LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. | 289 |
before said, would have undertaken the war when he was solicited
by the Greeks to do so, if they had complied with the terms he considered indispensable to
their success, which were that he should have uncontrolled power over the army. Whilst the
Greek government were treating with Napier, a distinguished French
officer, Colonel Fabvier, volunteered his services
without any stipulations, and was accepted. Napier having no other
object than the success of a just cause, pointed out to me on the map, the strategy and
tactics he should have used at that juncture, had he commanded, the Greek forces in the
Morea. I asked him to write his plan, as the art of war is so little studied by our
military men. I transcribe a campaign on scientific principles, as improvised on the
exigency of the moment, by the great master of the art; the general principles laid down by
so skilful a commander, are applicable to any other locality in all times, especially in
defensive warfare, and it requires no prophet to foretel there will be many such wars ere
the lamb lies down with the lion.
Napier’s letters not only exemplify the skill
of the soldier, but show the frank, generous, manly character of the man. Byron, in a letter
to the Greek
committee from Cephalonia, in 1823, speaking of Colonel Napier, says,
“Of his military character, it is superfluous to speak, of his personal, I can
say, from my own knowledge as well as from all rumour or private report, that it is as
excellent as his military; in short, a better or a braver man, is not easily to be
found; he is our man, to lead a regular force, or to organise a national one for the
Greeks,—ask the army—ask any one.”
The following letters are addressed to me by this great General:—.
26th
May, 1826.
Circumstances must decide in war, speaking generally, but
frequently they may be commanded by able arrangements; instead of waiting to
see what an enemy will do, he may be often forced to do that which we want him
to do. I think this may be now accomplished by the Greek troops, should
Ibrahim Pacha besiege Napoli di
Romania. In this event, I conclude he will have about 15,000 men, and that he
will draw his supplies from Navarin or Modon, a distance of about eighty miles;
| LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. | 291 |
and have an intermediate depôt at Tripolitza,
which is about twenty-five from Napoli. These roads pass through the mountains,
and great difficulties will arise in marching his convoys, both from the nature
of the country itself, and the exposure to constant attacks.
I also conclude that the Greek forces will amount to about
6,000 regulars and 10,000 irregulars, exclusive of the garrison of Napoli, in
which I would leave only irregulars, the best to be had; taking the worst, with
the whole regular force, to Monemvasia, into which place I would throw in as
much provision as possible; and leaving this fortress with the smallest
possible garrison picked from the irregulars, but (as well as Napoli di
Romania) with the most resolute governor and engineers,
I would issue forth and throw the whole regular and remaining irregular force
on the communications of the besieging army.
The point at which I would cut them must be determined by local circumstances, viz., the force of the enemy; the
distribution of that force; the nature of the country; and the exact knowledge
of distances, or rather times of march. By this,
the
Greek army would oblige the Egyptian army to
raise the
siege, or to
send a force able to clear the road of
the Greek army, or he must go without provisions; if he raises the
siege, such a failure, besides its actual cost, would have an immense moral
effect to his prejudice, and enable the Greeks to take more bold measures; in
short, it would be, what they have yet not seen, a victory produced by sound
principles of war.
If he prefers the second way, viz., to send a force which he
thinks capable of clearing the road, and re-opening his communications, what is
the consequence? His army must be so weakened that the siege cannot be
continued with vigour; and the detached force will either be fought and
defeated by the Greeks, or they would retire before this force into Maina, and
even to Monemvasia. The moment this was done, this detached force would again
march to join Ibrahim before Napoli; and
would be followed up by the Greek army, which would again occupy its old
position on the communication. This might be repeated twice or three times; but
it is impossible that Ibrahim could continue this game
long, and the moment he ceased to play it,
| LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. | 293 |
he would be
obliged to raise the siege. It seems difficult to say how this plan could fail,
unless the Greek commander allowed the force detached against him to cut him
off from Monemvasia, or from wherever he drew his subsistence.
As to the third choice, it is evident that he could not adopt
it, as, although his Egyptians may live upon little, yet that little they must
have; he would therefore try to receive his supplies from Patras; and although
there would, perhaps, be more difficulty still, the Greek general might play
the same game on that line of operation, as he would on the line with Navarin.
He might occupy the last with his regulars, and detach his irregulars on the
first. A Turkish force could hardly venture against the Greek irregulars,
having their left flank exposed to the regular army of Greeks. I do not know
whether I have clearly explained my meaning; but I am sure that if the Greek
government will do what they ought, viz., give Colonel Fabvier the full and uncontrolled direction of the war,
or do this with Colonel Gordon, both those gentlemen will see what I mean, and
that this plan is formed on sound strategetical principles.
It is impossible to believe that any force which Ibrahim could detach would be able to force
six thousand regular Greek soldiers through the passes of the Mainiote country
back upon Monemvasia. I have only supposed the worst in supposing that they
would do this, but in point of fact I imagine the Greek regular force could
occupy some strong position in which it would force the troops detached against
it to give battle under every disadvantage; and should the Greeks be defeated,
that they might rally at and defend a multitude of defiles in the strong
country between Tripolitza and Monemvasia—all these things are details of
the execution, which depend on the talents of the commanders. If this commander
is Colonel Fabvier with Colonel Gordon supporting him, there is no
doubt in my mind of its success; if the Greek force, on the contrary, is
commanded by the Greek General-in-Chief, Colocotroni, it must inevitably fail, as he is incapable of
even comprehending, much less of executing such a campaign.
In regard to the number of forces that I have supposed on
each side, it is not very material that I should be exact, because the
principle will hold
| LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. | 295 |
good as long as the disproportion
between the opposed armies is not
so great as to put an
end to all opposition, and this is a disproportion so vast that in such a
country as Greece I can hardly conceive possible. Supposing that the Turkish
forces receive their provision by sea, then they would not perhaps detach a
force against the Greek army coming from Monemvasia, which might attack
Tripolitza at its leisure: this, I suspect, would quickly produce the desired
results! And last, though not least important, one has everything to expect
from
Lord Cochrane, who will not allow
this provision to arrive by sea so easily. Are we to suppose that one of the
greatest men of the age, for such he decidedly is, will be unable to effect
anything against the enemy? Lord Cochrane’s whole
life has been a series of proofs, that he possesses all the qualities of a
great commander.
When I returned from my ride, I wrote down what I
said;—if you think it would be of any use, send it to Gordon. Not but that both he and Fabvier could form this plan as well or
better than
I, but my own opinion may have some
weight with the Greeks, in support of those held by these two officers. For
my own part, I would try this plan had I but
one
thousand men and
one cannon! so convinced am I that
it is a sound one; and that if executed with skill, activity, and courage
it would make
Ibrahim lose his game.
Yours,
I dare say this is full of errors, for I wrote as fast as
I could scribble; keep it, for I have no copy. I wish you to give me one.
Cephalonia, 20th June, 1826.
Many thanks for your note dated 12th, which I have only this
morning received. I hear Hastings has
reached Napoli, which I hope will help Gordon to make arrangements. I hear that Ibrahim Pacha has taken and fortified
Sparta.—If he can occupy Leondari and Sparta with strong detachments, he
may render the execution of my plan difficult; but if he divides his forces
with such numerous garrisons, the question arises, whether or not he can
| LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. | 297 |
keep the field? However, he would greatly embarrass all
operations by fortifying Leondari and Mistra (Sparta). These posts are, at this
moment, the real points of “strategy” for the defence of Napoli;
and his seizure of them denotes a good military head. Were I in
Gordon’s place, supposing him master of his
movements, I would make them keep their
vigils in
Sparta. That garrison should have no sinecure; but my fear is, that at Napoli
they are all in such a state of confusion and ignorance, that he will not be
able to make any movements at all. However, all I can say is, that the loss of
any strong post demands that the Greeks should act upon the same principle
against those posts, that would have been acted upon against the original
positions of the Turks. The general principle remains the same, but is applied
to a different locality. For example (take your map).—When Mistra is held
by the Turks, the Greeks can no longer throw themselves on the line of
communication between Tripolitza and Navarin. They must then change their
object, and throw themselves on the line between Mistra; and from wherever the
garrison draws its provisions, Mistra becomes the
object
instead of Tripolitza. How this is to be accomplished, God knows. The war is,
in this instance, on too small a scale to judge by a map, as I could in a large
movement acting against Tripolitza; but military talent, in a country like the
Morea, finds ways to do what it wants. The grand secret in
mountain countries is to
isolate the enemy,
which obliges him to abandon
his strong position, and
attack you in
yours. It is not to one so well acquainted
with the country as you are, that I need say what it would be to attack a good
position in Greece, even without fortifications, much more with them.
It is in the art of forcing an enemy to fight you on your own
chosen ground, that military genius consists, and few things are more difficult
in practice. It unites so much theory and so much practice with great
fearlessness of character, no timid man will throw himself into those decisive
positions which produce great results.
Yours truly,
|
LAST DAYS OF SHELLEY AND BYRON. |
299 |
Cephalonia, 1st August, 1826.
Pray do not let Mr. Ruppenthal say that
I made proposals to him, without contradicting him, because I did no such
thing. I think I know what he is; but be he what he may, he can make nothing of
my letters that can do me any harm, supposing he should be a bad one. When one
has no secrets it is hard to discover them!
I hope Gordon has made
port. I do not understand Fabvier’s movements. I dare say they are not voluntary. I
give no man credit for doing what he likes—what is wise—in Greece;
until I hear that he has 2000 good European drilled soldiers at his back, and
100,000 in his pockets, and a gallows with his advanced guard. I think were I
there with the only power that would tempt me to go, I should raise the price
of hemp 50 per cent, in ten days. What has become of Lord Cochrane? all hands say he
comes—but he comes not! With kind regards to
Gordon if he is with you, believe me.
Yours hastily,
I wish to God something may be done for the Greeks, for
our orders are positive not to admit fugitives, and really though I think
the rules laid down by the government are just, it is very distressing to
execute them,—at least to me it is so.
Sir Frederick William Adam (1784-1853)
The son of William Adam (1751-1839); he served in Spain, fought at Waterloo, and was
afterwards lord high commissioner of the Ionian Islands (1824-1832).
Thomas Cochrane, tenth earl of Dundonald (1775-1860)
After an adventurous naval career in the Napoleonic wars he was caught up in financial
scandal and dismissed; he secured the independence of Chile and Peru (1819-22) but was less
successful as admiral of the Greek navy (1827-28); he was MP (1806, expelled 1814) and
succeeded to the earldom in 1831.
Charles Nicolas Fabvier (1782-1855)
French philhellene who after serving under Napoleon was commander of the Government
regular forces in the Greek War of Independence.
Thomas Gordon of Cairness (1788-1841)
Educated at Eton and Brasenose College, Oxford; he was a member of the London Greek
Committee and major-general in the Greek Army; he published
History of
the Greek Revolution (1832).
Gawen William Rowan Hamilton (1783 c.-1834)
The son of Archibald Hamilton Rowan; he joined the Royal Navy in 1801 and after serving
in the Napoleonic Wars commanded a squadron that saw action in the Greek Revolution and the
Battle of Navarino.
Frank Abney Hastings (1794-1828)
After service in the British Navy where he fought at Trafalgar he was a notably
successful commander of the Greek Navy during the Revolution.
Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt (1789-1848)
The son of Muhammad Ali of Egypt; he was the Egyptian general who led Turkish forces
against the Wahabis in Arabia (1816-19) and the revolutionaries in Greece (1825-28).
Sir Thomas Maitland (1760-1824)
Lieutenant-general and colonial administrator; he was commander-in-chief of Ceylon
(1806-11) and lord high commissioner of the Ionian islands, and of the Mediterranean
(1815).
Sir Charles James Napier (1782-1853)
British officer who after a career in the Napoleonic wars knew Byron while he was the
military resident in Cephalonia.
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792-1822)
English poet, with Byron in Switzerland in 1816; author of
Queen
Mab (1813),
The Revolt of Islam (1817),
The Cenci and
Prometheus Unbound (1820), and
Adonais (1821).
Edward John Trelawny (1792-1881)
Writer, adventurer, and friend of Shelley and Byron; author of the fictionalized memoirs,
Adventures of a Younger Son (1831) and
Recollections of the Last Days of Shelley and Byron (1858).