Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Francis Hodgson to Susanna Tayler Hodgson, [October? 1814]
It is most natural that Byron should be absorbed by the thought even, much more by the
society, of one of the most divine beings upon earth. He was on his way to
Seaham, Sir Ralph Milbanke’s seat.
His sister, in her last sweet letter,
says, ‘I have not heard from him for some time, and am uneasy about
it; but it is very selfish to be so, for I know he is happy, and what more
can I wish.’ Well, on Friday evening, after I had put my letter
to you in the post, and one to Harry
Drury, and one to my cousin, I was tired with writing, and
thought I would go to the coffee-room and read the papers. With nothing then,
for the moment, but Colonel Quintin and Hanoverianism in my head, I was
passing by the Sun Inn, literally passing by if, and at a quick pace, when a
carriage and four drove up to the door. A sudden thought struck me; I cried out
‘Byron!’ and was answered by
a hearty
290 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
‘Hodgson!’ He
was about to send to me at King’s. He would not have found me there, as I
should have been detained for an hour at least with Colonel Quintin. Consequently, he would have
gone on to his sister’s, and I should not have seen him. As it was, we
supped together and sate till a late hour over our claret, talking of many and
delightful things. He told me all that could be told of
his visit to Seaham, and, in a word, for I can say no more if I talk for ever
on the subject, he is likely to be as happy as I am. Oh!
how I glowed with indignation at the base reporters of his Fortune-hunting. I will tell you the particulars when we meet.
Meanwhile, entre nous, he is
sacrificing a great deal too much. Not to Miss
M.—that is impossible—because nothing is too much for
her, and (as is usual in these cases) she would require nothing. But her
parents (although B. speaks of them with the most beautiful respect) certainly
to me appear to be most royally selfish persons. Her fortune is not large at
present, but he settles £60,000 upon her. This he cannot do without
selling Newstead again; and with a look and manner that I cannot easily forget
he said: ‘You know we must think of these things as little as
possible.’ ‘But,’ I replied, ‘I am certain, if she saw
Newstead | CONVERSATION WITH BYRON. | 291 |
she would not let
you part with it.’ ‘Bless her! she has nothing to do with it. Nor
would I excite a feeling in her mind that may be prejudicial to her
interests.’ Now where, where are the hearts of those who can under-value,
who can depreciate this man? Besides this, Miss M.’s principal
expectations are from Lord Wentworth, her
uncle, an old and very infirm man, whom I have often met at Rugby. Perfectly
disposed to pay him every respect, B. would not go out of his road to visit
him. To meet him he would have been very glad, but he went straight to Miss M.
He is returning to town for the purpose of settling all legal affairs, and
returns to the North in a fortnight, straight to be married. He fully explained
to Miss M. his feeling about Lord W. She was satisfied, and that is enough. As
to herself, I have much indeed to tell you. The whole story is an interesting
one. B. knows that the lawyers will not be ready for him for this day or two,
and therefore, although he was going immediately to London, he means to stay in
the neighbourhood till’ Wednesday to vote for his friend Clark,1 of Trinity, at
the election for the Anatomical Professor. He promised . . . .
292 |
MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
|
|
P.S.—I open my letter to say that when Lord Byron went to give his vote just now in the
Senate House, the young men burst out into the most rapturous applause.
Mine of yesterday mentioned in the postscript the
nattering manner in which Lord Byron was
received in the Senate House. I should add that as I was going to vote I met
him coming away, and presently saw that something had happened, by his extreme
paleness and agitation. Dr. Clark, who
was with him, told me the cause, and I returned with B. to my room. There I
begged him to sit down and write a letter and communicate this event, which he
did not feel up to, but wished I would. So down I sate
and commenced my acquaintance with Miss
Milbanke by writing her an account of this most pleasing event,
which, although nothing at Oxford, is here very unusual indeed; and, as I told
you, had occasioned the dismissal of the young men from the Senate House only a
few days ago. I also wrote to his sister, and thus I have two more female friends, or one at least,
to introduce.
We dined with Dr.
Clark and saw a very sweet woman in his wife; himself the most
natural, pleasing, and kind of men. But more upon this subject when we meet.
This morning Lord B. and Mr. | FRIENDSHIP. AN EPITAPH. | 293 |
Hobhouse departed. B. is to send me word
about —— as a pupil.
Edward Daniel Clarke (1769-1822)
English traveler and collector, the younger brother of James Stanier Clarke; he was
professor of mineralogy at Cambridge (1808) and university librarian (1817). He published
Travels in various Countries of Europe, Asia and Africa
(1810-23) and corresponded with Byron.
Henry Joseph Thomas Drury (1778-1841)
The eldest son of Joseph Drury, Byron's headmaster; he was fellow of King's College,
Cambridge and assistant-master at Harrow from 1801. In 1808 he married Ann Caroline Tayler,
whose sisters married Drury's friends Robert Bland and Francis Hodgson.
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).
Hon. Augusta Mary Leigh [née Byron] (1783-1851)
Byron's half-sister; the daughter of Amelia Darcy, Baroness Conyers, she married
Lieutenant-Colonel George Leigh on 17 August 1807.
Thomas Noel, second viscount Wentworth (1745-1815)
The son of Edward Noel, first viscount Wentworth of Wellesborough and only brother of
Judith Milbanke; upon his death his heirs took the name Noel.
The Trial of Colonel Quentin, of the Tenth, or, Prince of Wales's Own,
Hussars, by a general Court-martial. (London: Gale, Curtis, and Fenner, 1814). Quentin, tried for dereliction of duty, was aid-de-camp to the Prince Regent.