Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Chapter XV. 1816-18.
34 |
MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON
|
|
CHAPTER XV.
LETTERS FROM MRS. LEIGH—COMMENTS ON THE SEPARATION.
1816-1818.
Soon after the separation had actually taken place, and
Byron had left his native land for ever, his
faithful friend and devoted sister resumed their correspondence on the same sad subject.
Six Mile Bottom: June 10.
Dear Mr.
Hodgson,—Your kind letter found me here, and was most
acceptable, for I began to marvel at your silence. But don’t suppose this
to be a reproach, for I know how numerous must be the claims and calls upon
your time, and I feel how kind you are to devote any part of it to me. I
don’t know why I should intrude on you so soon again, except that you
desire I will write, or that I can tell you of B.’s safe arrival at Geneva. I have not had any letter
since that from Coblentz, dated 11th May, which I believe I mentioned in my
last to you. But Mr. Hobhouse has heard twice since that, and
always communicates to me when he does so of his health and safety. Of myself I
can tell you little that will give you satisfaction, except that I am pretty
well, only weak and nervous, and no wonder, for none can know how much I have suffered from this unhappy business.
I have written to Mr.
Hobhouse to know what this new publication1 means, and to hope it is nothing that can revive the dying embers.
Would that I could talk to you! I think it might calm my mind; it is impossible
by letter to give you any idea of the proceedings and confusion after you left
Town. I suppose you have heard of Lady C.
L.’s extraordinary production—‘Glenarvon,’ a novel.
The hero and heroine you may guess; the former painted in the most atrocious
colours. If you have not, pray read it. You foretold
mischief in that quarter, and much has occurred, if only that I hear this horrid book is supposed and believed a true delineation
of his character; and the letters true copies of
originals, etc., etc., etc.! I can’t think of her with Christian charity, so I won’t dwell upon the subject, but pray read it. I had a letter from
36 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
Lady B. the other day. She is at Kirkby, and
I fear her health is very indifferent. The bulletins of the poor
child’s health, by B.’s desire,
pass through me, and I’m very sorry for it, and that I ever had any
concern in this most wretched business. I can’t, however, explain all my
reasons at this distance, and must console myself by the consciousness of
having done my duty, and, to the best of my judgment, all I could for the
happiness of
both. Have you by chance, dear
Mr. H., some letters I wrote you in answer to some of
yours, and
in favour of Lady B. and
her family? If you have, may I request you not yet to destroy them, and to tell
me fairly when you next write if you ever heard me say one word that could
detract from
her merits, or make you think me partial to
his side of the question? Whatever ideas these
questions may suggest pray at present keep to yourself. I will, when I have an
opportunity, say what you wish to her in your own words. Many thanks for your
kind enquiries. My children,
five, are all well.
Col. L. is in Sussex, and, perhaps,
may stay a short time. He is in dreadfully low spirits in consequence of
difficulties of our own, and altogether you would wonder at my being
alive. But strength is given to us in proportion to our
trials. Whenever you have
| LETTER FROM MRS. LEIGH. | 37 |
a
moment to spare, pray let me hear. You shall of dearest B. when I do; and with
best regards to
Mrs. H.,
Believe me, ever truly yours,
A. L.
Chair Court, St. James’s Palace: August 12, 1816.
Dear Mr. H.,—I have a frank, and no
time to write. What a trial of temper, particularly to a Byronic one!
I must say, however, how very glad I was to receive the
intelligence of your piece of good fortune, which followed me here, and I
wished to say so immediately, but my time is very little at my own disposal in
this land of confusion. I cannot tell you half my joy at
this (your living),1 and I have lost no time in sending
it to dear B., who is still near Geneva. Direct à Milord B., Poste Restante, à Genève en Suisse. I
heard from him (date 29 July) well—at least he says nothing to the
contrary—complains of the weather—has been visiting Madame de Staël, and so on. I’ve
not a moment now to write comfortably, so will only beg you and Mrs. H. to accept my best congratulations, and
good wishes and thanks for wishing to see me and mine in your new abode. I
should be delighted
1 Hodgson had lately been presented to the living of
Bakewell. |
38 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
to visit you
anywhere. Your visit
to the dear Abbey interested me. I hear poor
Murray is in a very declining state.
Adieu, dear Mr. H. I came here a month
ago for my Court duties, and shall perhaps remain in Town a week or two longer.
Can I do anything for you or Mrs. H.?
Pray command me if I can.
Ever very truly your obliged,
Six Mile Bottom: Tuesday evening, October 29.
Dear Mr. H.,—I have many a time
resolved and intended to write to you, since my last promise to do so again,
but I have doubted how I ought to direct till the other day I heard from the
Dowager Duchess of Rutland that you
were settled at Bakewell. I took the opportunity of saying how much you had
been pleased and benefited by the D. of
R.’s kindness, which I thought was what you would wish me
to do; and I had the great pleasure of hearing all the
good (no not all) that I think of
you repeated, and how much her grandson liked being with you, etc., etc., etc.
My husband has just asked me to whom I
am writing, and desires me to say that the Duke of R. has spoken very kindly and
highly of you to him, and hopes to make your acquaintance very soon. And now, dear Mr. H., for our old subject, dear B. I wonder whether you have heard from him. My last
intelligence was of him through Mr.
Murray, who had a letter dated Martigny, 9th October, on his
road to Milan. The last to me was on the 2nd October from Geneva, and sending
me a short but most interesting journal of an excursion to the Bernese Alps. He
speaks of his health as very good, but, alas! his
spirits appear wofully the contrary. I believe, however, that he does not write
in that strain to others. Sometimes I venture to indulge a hope that what I
wish most earnestly for him may be working its way in his mind. Heaven grant
it!
Mr. Davies,1
perhaps you have heard, has come home. He was with B. at Geneva, and gives very good accounts of his health and
spirits, though he confesses he found him gloomy.
Mr. Hobhouse is still with him. He
has not mixed much in society; report says from
necessity, his friends from choice. You may have heard
also that another Canto of ‘Childe Harold’ is about to appear. From the little I know of
it I wish it may not contain allusions to his own domestic concerns, which had
better have been omitted; and I fear he indulges
40 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
in that bitter strain which must be so galling to the
feelings of the friends of poor
Lady B. I
believe I have not written to you since I had the pleasure of seeing her and
the dear little girl in London. She was looking a little better, but I am sorry
to say her health is
very indifferent still, and I
cannot but feel great uneasiness about her. The little girl is a
very fine child, but with more resemblance to mother
than father; still there is a look. I never saw a more healthy little thing. It
was a melancholy pleasure to see it, and a very great comfort to see dear
Lady B., for I had suffered great uneasiness, of which
I think I gave you hints, and this has been entirely removed.
Wednesday.
I will finish my letter in hopes of a frank, and have to add
that this day’s post has brought me one from B. of the 15th Oct., telling me of his having passed the
Simplon safely, and arrived at Milan. He appears delighted with the beauty of
the scenery on his road, and was seeing all worth seeing at Milan. He writes
cheerfully. Now adieu, dear Mr. H.
With best regards to Mrs.
H.,
Believe me ever yours sincerely,
A. L.
Dear Mr.
Hodgson,—I am so glad of an excuse to write to you, that I
avail myself of that of our last letters having crossed,
and there being many points in yours upon which mine would not satisfy you. To
begin with dear B. The last tidings of him
were from Milan, the 13th October, having just arrived there without disasters,
or encounter of robbers on the Simplon. The style struck me as being more
cheerful than former letters. I told you something, and indeed I daresay all I
know, of the Canto, etc. I see
they make their appearance on the 23rd. The story of their being sent to
Lady B. I think I may safely say is
untrue. She was, as well as me, on the eve of leaving Town when Murray received them, and he paid her the compliment of showing them. I think he had scarcely
time to look them over. This may by some means have been twisted into the tale
you have heard; but perhaps you had better keep my information to yourself. I am afraid to open my lips, though all I say
to you I know is secure from misinterpretation. On the opinions expressed by
Mr. M. I am not surprised. I
have seen letters written to him which could not but
give rise to such, or confirm them. If I may give you mine, it is that in his own mind there were and are recollections, fatal
to
42 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
his peace, and which would have prevented his being
happy with any woman whose excellence equalled or approached that of
Lady B., from the consciousness of being unworthy of
it. Nothing could or can remedy this fatal cause but the consolations to be
derived from religion, of which, alas! dear Mr. H., our
beloved B. is, I fear, destitute. My anxious prayer for him, is for that first
and
only certain good, and I should be wretched indeed
bereaved of
hope on that subject. His friends (who for
the most part are more or less deceived about him) argue thus: ‘Oh! had
he married a woman of the world, she would have let him have his way, and have
had hers—and they would have done very well;’ and this is worldly
reasoning.
I happen to know that dear Lady
B. would have sacrificed all her own tastes and pursuits,
everything but her
duty, to make him happy; but all was
in vain: it is indeed a heart-breaking thought! And worse than all, not all my
affection or anxiety can be either of use or comfort to him. I shall pain you
as much as I feel it myself, but it is a relief to talk of him to one who loves
him and feels so rationally at the same time all there is to
hope and
fear for him. I’m sure it is
very useless to try to express my feelings towards him—I
never could. Pray read
over the 17th, 18th, and 19th stanzas of
‘
Lara;’ they are
quite wonderfully
resemblant. Sometimes it strikes me he must have
two minds! Such a mixture of blindness and
perception! I don’t know whether you can understand me. Pray always say
anything that you wish and think about him.
Nov. 14.
I am obliged to finish this letter, which was begun some days
ago, rather in haste, for a frank and the post. I hope you will give me the
pleasure of hearing from you when you can. B. desires me to direct to him ‘à Genève, Poste
Restante.’ His banker there forwards his letters. I quite dread the Poems. So afraid of their renewing unpleasant
recollections in the public mind, and containing bitterness towards her who has
already suffered too much. Mind, whatever you hear pray tell me. B. has once or
twice said he thought of returning to England in the spring; but I don’t
indulge much hope on the subject, nor do I know that it would be desirable. You
have probably heard by this time all that is known about the dreadful fire at
B. Castle:1 I felt so sorry for it, as knowing the
duke and duchess, and the
44 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
latter being so attached to it. I should indeed delight in
paying you and
Mrs. H. a visit, but with
five children to nurse and educate you will feel
that I cannot make any long or distant absence from home. Our plans are,
however, in great uncertainty, as our place is for sale, and if we could get a
purchaser we must go
somewhere. If ever I go
north, it shall not be without at least a call at
Bakewell. I hope Mrs. H.’s health will not suffer
from the cold climate. I passed seven years of my life, from six years old to
thirteen, about seven miles from Chesterfield, at a village called Eckington,
and well remember the coal pits! My children are all well, thank God!
Col. L. desires his best compliments.
Ever very truly yours,
A. L.
Pray write to B. I
have much more to say, but cannot say it now.
Six Mile Bottom: Tuesday evening, March 4, 1817.
Dear Mr. H.,—Thank you many thousand times for your
very kind and most welcome letter, which followed me to Town, where I went on
the 6th and remained till the 24th of February, on Court duty. I am sure if I had followed my
inclination it would not have remained even thus long unanswered, for indeed I
feel all the friendship and kindness which prompts you to bestow any portion of
your precious time upon me. As the only return, except my thanks, which I am
able to make you is giving you all the information I receive about our dear
B., I will begin by that subject of our
mutual interest. From him I have not heard for nearly
five weeks, and his letter was dated the 13th January. Of him I have heard a little later accounts. Mr. Murray showed me a letter to him dated the
24th of January, and I believe Mr. Moore
has heard since that. I am daily hoping to do so, for any unusual silence puts
me into a fidget. His last letters have been uncomfortable. In one of them, after giving me the history of a new attachment, he says, ‘and tell Hodgson his prediction is fulfilled; you
know he foretold I should fall in love with an Italian, and so I
have.’ I should prefer giving you a more agreeable message, dear
Mr. H., but I don’t like to withhold any of his
words to you. As for the circumstance it alludes to, it
is only one among a million of melancholy anticipations
of mine, for the evils always arise fast and soon enough, it is not always easy
to wait for
46 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
their arrival; at least I don’t find it
so. He has not lately to me recurred to the intention of returning to England,
but I hear it is circulated by his friends—or
soi-disant tels—for which, however, I suspect motives, and still doubt on the
subject. Upon the whole, my opinion is that greater evils are to be apprehended
from his immediate return than his continued absence, but God knows! I may be
wrong. You, who know how ardently I wish him
every good,
will enter into all my anxieties. He has lately given himself and others much
needless worry on the subject of the poor dear
little girl. Somebody wrote—I believe merely as a piece
of gossiping news—that
Lady B.
intended to pass this winter abroad, which occasioned a letter addressed to me
by B. to be despatched with all speed, insisting upon a promise that the child
should never leave England. Of course I transmitted the message. The answer
was, Lady B. had never had any intention of quitting
England. This did not satisfy, and several others have followed. At last, thank
Heaven, the business is transacted through
Mr.
Hanson, and Lady B. has declined answering
through me; much to my satisfaction, as I cannot do any good in it.
It appears that the child is a ward in
Chancery, which I
must own I consider fortunate as things are at present. I did not know it till
I went to Town, where I most unexpectedly met poor Lady
B., who had come there on this business. You will be glad to
hear that she looked much better and, I hope, is really stronger, and gradually improving in health, though still quite
unequal to hurry and agitation of any kind. I told her of your request that I
would inform you of her health, and she desired me to say she felt much
gratified by the kind interest you express for her. The little girl was left at Kirkby, as she came
but for a few days, but is quite well, and, I hear, a very fine child. It makes
me wretched to think of her, and I’m sure of your sympathy in such a
feeling. We can, indeed, only pray and trust Heaven for our dear B. If I hear soon from him you shall know what he
says.
I am glad you were rather agreeably surprised in the Poems. I
own I was so; but the different opinions, and
impressions, and reflections of different people are enough to drive one mad.
Your approbation of the lines on poor Major
Howard (our very particular friend)
delighted me very much. They were what I was most anxious should be approved.
Of course you know to whom the
48 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
‘
Dream’
1 alludes,
Mrs. C———. I am
very much of your opinion on all the points of your observation. Have you seen
the Reviews? The ‘
Quarterly’ has given great offence to all those who
call themselves
Lady
B.’s friends and party. It only appears to me that such
discussions would be better omitted, and
that the
‘
Edinburgh’ has
most wisely done.
B. never mentions Newstead; I dare not ask for fear of hearing it is
gone. I, too, have an atom of your ‘indefinite hope,’ but I never
venture to express it except to you. It makes me unhappy to think of what you
feel about dear B.’s silence; but I am sure, in spite of this, your
friendship is valued as much as ever.
We are not likely to remove till May or June, so pray direct
as usual whenever you have a moment to spare, and, believe
me that I am always most delighted to receive a
letter from you. My children are well; Georgey is really a very dear little girl. You will easily
believe that my hands are quite full, with five to teach
and nurse. But it is fortunate I have such an imperious demand upon my time and
attention. I do not know what
otherwise would have
become of me with the source of wretchedness about poor dear B.
Col. Leigh desires me most particularly to
present his best regards to you, and Georgey desires her
love.
Ever yours most sincerely,
A. L.
26 Great Quebec Street, Montague Square:
April 21, 1818.
Dear Mr.
Hodgson,—Your kind letter, which travelled a little in pursuit
of me, began with the very sentence I have been thinking of writing you for an
age at least! It appeared to me very long since I had heard of or from you, so
I was for ever intending and wishing to write, but I had
so little to say on what is most interesting to you,
poor B.’s subject. He was nine long
months silent to me, and you know that in spite of all one’s reason one
must feel such a silence very much. However, he has written at last, making
many lame excuses for not doing so during that period. I could wish not to be
selfish on this subject, and I have long been too sure that I can neither do or
say anything for his comfort. Indeed, dear Mr. H., I
don’t know who can in his very unhappy state of
feeling and perverted way of
50 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
thinking. His letters to me
being unreserved on such points, give me more pain than pleasure. He is still
at Venice. I believe he meets
Mr. Hanson
at Geneva to
sign and
seal away
poor dear Newstead. Alas! A
Major
Wildman has bought it for £90,000 or guineas, I forget
which. Sixty thousand pound was secured by his marriage settlements, the
interest of which he receives for life, and which ought to make him very
comfortable. There was a mortgage, as I’ve heard, of £20,000 on the
estate, and the remainder will pay off debts; so that, looking to his immediate
comfort, we may consider the sale as a fortunate circumstance. But I am sure,
dear Mr. H., you will enter into the feelings of
all who regret that beloved Abbey
for
its own sake.
‘Beppo’ is his, at least; though he has
never said so, one may infer it from a thousand things. The 4th Canto is forthcoming, and I rather dread
it for fear of more bitterness on the old subject. Lady
B. is at Kirkby Mallory, in Leicestershire, but writes me word
she intends being at Seaham during the summer months. She was some time ago in
very bad health, but I am happy to hear now better than for some time past. The
little girl is always well, and
represented as the finest and most intelli-gent child it is possible to meet with. I hear
different reports as to her beauty; some people say there is a strong
resemblance to her father. I am glad to find you are about to appear in the
shape of the ‘Friends.’ Pray let me hear from you whenever you can spare a
moment. I am always anxious to receive good accounts of your and Mrs. H.’s health and welldoing, and am
sincerely grateful to you both for your kind thoughts of me. I have this house
merely as a temporary habitation, and am hoping for a more fixed residence. You
shall hear if I have any good to relate. My husband has been in the country
some weeks on hunting excursions, but I am sure will join with me in all that
is kind to you and yours, and Georgiana desires to do so. Adieu! my dear Mr.
H. Pray excuse the hurry in which I end this, having been
interrupted. I forgot or omitted to say, for our
comforts, that Major Wildman
has, I hear, soul enough to value the dear Abbey and its ruinous perfections:
so much so that he would not remove a stone, and wishes to restore it as far as
he can. I hope this report is true. He was aide-de-camp to the Marquis of Anglesea at the Battle of Waterloo,
and this is the extent of my savoir on this subject.
52 |
MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
|
|
Pray give my best remembrances to Mrs. H., and believe me
Most truly yours,
A. L.
St. James’s Palace: December 30, 1818.
Dear Mr.
Hodgson,—I have very long been reproaching myself for my
silence towards you, and your kind letter really fills me with remorse. I well
recollect my promise of writing should I have good to relate, and, having been
eight months established in apartments of my own here, contrary to my most
sanguine expectations and hopes, it appears to me downright ingratitude to have
omitted telling one who would have rejoiced so sincerely in my good fortune. I
can only confess my fault and beg forgiveness. A hundred times at least have I
resolved upon despatching an epistle to Bakewell, and always something or other
has interfered with my resolve. But I won’t trouble you with excuses, but
proceed to thank you a thousand times for your kind indulgence and interest. It
would give me the greatest pleasure, dear Mr. H., to make
you a visit according to your kind invitation, and Col. L. will, I am sure, feel as grateful as I do. He is now at
Belvoir Castle. If I could find myself there during some of your holidays I surely should be tempted to
extend my trip to your vicarage. But, alas! at present I am so beset with
bairns of one age or other, it is difficult to leave or take them about.
However, let us hope, and I do, that you and Mrs. H. will never come south without
remembering I am to be found here, and should be so
happy to see you. Of our poor dear B. I have
received two letters within this last year—the last dated September. This
is all I can tell you from him: that he wrote (as usual
to me) on the old subject very uncomfortably, and on his present pursuits,
which are what one could but dread and expect of him. I hear he looks very
well, but fat, immensely large, and his hair long. Mr. Hanson
has lately returned from Venice, having been there to sign and seal away our
dear lamented Abbey. He left him well on the 19th November, but with no
intention of a return to England. I have not seen Mr. H.,
he wrote this to me; but no letter from B. So you see I must have patience as
well as you. I have heard from a friend of B. that it is the intention of
Mr. Kinnaird and Mr. Hobhouse to take the affairs out of
Hanson’s hands. If all that is said is true so
much the better. I hear, too, that Fletcher is coming home, that B. writes in good
54 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
spirits, but that he is sure to do to those
correspondents. There are some poems forthcoming—God knows what—but
I will write to you again soon. I am vexed at your hint from the Midland
County; and, do you know, I never allow myself to believe such things except
from you, or one as candid and well acquainted with both sides of the question.
Is the initial of the name D. or M. or C.? I have three guesses. God bless you,
dear Mr. H. With kindest remembrances and wishes for your
welfare and happiness,
I remain,
Yours most truly,
A. L.
The preceding letters have been given consecutively, without more comment
than was absolutely required for immediate illustration, in order that the narrative which
they so graphically relate might not be interrupted, and that the fresh light which they
throw upon the much vexed question of Lord and Lady Byron’s separation might not for a moment be
obscured by the clouds of unnecessary observation. But a collective consideration of their
general import, no less than of the significance of certain particular sentences, will
probably suggest to the minds of most
| CAUSES OF THE SEPARATION. | 55 |
readers reflections of a similar nature; while, on the one main subject of discussion,
which for upwards of half a century has provoked so many differences of opinion, and given
rise to such a multitude of surmises, all more or less preposterous—some positively
grotesque in their monstrosity—on the doubt which has hitherto existed whether the
cause of the separation was one great crime or a concurrence of conflicting circumstances,
these letters afford plain and unanswerable evidence. The truth of Lord
Byron’s own oft-quoted statement that ‘the causes were too
simple to be easily found out’ is amply attested by these letters; and the
idea of some secret enormity, too horrible for Lady Byron to mention,
must henceforth and for ever be abandoned by all unprejudiced persons.
What, then, were the incompatibilities, magnified by Lady Byron’s persistent silence into one unutterable
criminality, which destroyed the domestic happiness of these two highly-gifted beings?
Among the chief causes of disagreement it appears that it will not be wrong (however
material such a consideration may seem) to place the condition of the noble poet’s
health, both at the commencement, and, with short intervals, during the continuance, of his
married life. The melancholy and dejection which were more
56 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
plainly
visible at this than at any other period of his existence, were, doubtless, to a very great
degree, the result of his eccentric mode of living, his long fasts followed by excessive
feasts, his ‘sleeping by day and waking at nights,’ to which his sister alludes
with such tender solicitude. The state of nervous depression, which was the necessary
result of these irregular habits, increased the natural irritability of his temperament to
such an extent as to render him more than ever liable to those violent outbursts of passion
which may fairly be termed hereditary, inasmuch as they appear to have been extraordinarily
akin to those which were so painfully characteristic of the only parent whom he ever knew.
This was remarkably true of the effect produced upon him by Kean’s acting, his mother having been affected in a similar manner by
Mrs. Siddons; of the passionate destruction of
an old and favourite watch, by dashing it into the fire-place; of his throwing a jar of ink
out of his window at Hastings—a circumstance well remembered by Hodgson, who was staying in a neighbouring house.1
Such frantic paroxysms of passion, occasioned by
1 This jar alighted upon a figure of a muse in the garden
beneath the poet’s window, and for some time afterwards traces of this
poetical outburst were visible. |
the most trivial circumstances, could be
ascribed to physical derangement alone, even if we were not aware that his health was,
about the time of their occurrence, in a most disordered state. Those who really knew him
well, and understood the peculiarities of his marvellous organisation, were wont to treat
these ebullitions with the ridicule which they deserved, and which was their surest
preventive. Scrope Davies’ sensible remark on
such behaviour, that it was more like silliness than madness, was received by Byron with the candour and kindliness with which it was made.
But Lady Byron had not so read her
husband’s character. Accustomed to draw her conclusions with mathematical accuracy
from the premisses placed before her, she was incapable of making allowance for the
slightest deviation from the precise code of morals which she had adopted as her infallible
standard of propriety. Thus she mistook her husband’s genuine candour for hypocrisy,
and regarded the character which he so foolishly assumed as really belonging to him. She
was quite young, only twenty-four, at the time of the separation, but she was, like her
husband, an only child, and while he, partly through his love of mystery and the strange
fondness for representing himself as far worse than
58 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
he really was, had
gained as unenviable a notoriety for his private character as his public reputation as a
poet was brilliant, she had been accustomed from childhood to the homage of a circle of
admiring friends, who looked up to her as a personification of unerring virtue and
exemplary rectitude. Her interest in metaphysical speculations had also apparently been
fostered by a natural propensity for investigating individual motives, and sifting the
sources of human conduct. In these researches, moreover, she appears to have been guided by
certain fixed rules, and to have adhered to the convictions thus engendered with invincible
obstinacy. This was undeniably true on other occasions, and not only in one instance was
her apparent caprice most unjustifiable. William
Howitt has placed on record the story of a schoolmaster, whom she appointed
at Kirkby Mallory and subsequently dismissed without notice, and without assigning the
slightest reason for her sudden determination. Another story bears striking testimony to
the fact of her inability to appreciate beauty beyond the ordinary channels of her own
conceptions. A lady was talking to a gardener who was engaged in reducing a wild and
straggling garden to order, and who had formerly been employed in Lady
Byron’s service. On seeing a beautiful flower in full bloom on a neglected pathway he observed, with
a shrewd perception of character which was most remarkable, ‘Lady
Byron would have called that a weed.’ On the other hand, it
must not be forgotten that her ideas of moral excellence were so pure and lofty as to
occasion her inexpressible horror at anything approaching to a violation of the most rigid
decorum, and she must have shrunk with instinctive delicacy from many expressions which to
her husband’s enlarged experience were comparatively innocent.
Another source of disputation was the subject of religion, on which she
appears to have been as intolerant as he was culpably compliant. He doubted everything; she
would countenance nothing which was beyond the pale of her individual prejudices. He was
still, perhaps unconsciously, influenced by that gloomy Calvinism which veiled the
brightness of his boyhood; she was inclined to Socinianism. He considered his salvation
hopeless; she knew that she was saved.
Nor must we lose sight of those pecuniary difficulties which, entirely in
consequence of mismanagement, caused him at this trying time such unceasing annoyance, and
involved the sale of that ancestral home to which he was so ardently attached. Nor,
60 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
again, is it possible for an impartial observer to doubt that the
spirit which prompted so mighty a genius to condescend to the scathing satire of the
‘Sketch,’ was not a spirit
of unreasoning malevolence. By those who take an unbiassed view of all the circumstances of
the case the conclusion cannot be reasonably avoided that Mrs.
Clermont, the confidential attendant of both Lady Milbanke and her daughter, whether by means of insinuations and
innuendoes or by a more direct retaliation for the undisguised dislike which Lord Byron manifested towards her, was largely instrumental in
effecting that fatal breach, destined for ever to divide two noble natures which, after a
few short years of mutual forbearance, might have been united in perfect harmony to the
happiness and improvement of each other.
With regard to her parents, it is easy enough to understand, and impossible
not to admire, Lady Byron’s anxiety, doubtless
perfectly sincere, to shield them from the imputation of having in any way interfered in
the matter; but it is not so easy to believe that Byron,
who was not at all naturally inclined to take strong dislikes to men or women, should have
been deceived into the belief that they were interested in the separation, unless they were
indeed in some way concerned in it. Certain it is
that it was only by a sustained effort that he could
accommodate himself to the prosaic mode of existence which they had adopted by preference,
to their dislike for all that was poetical, to the unbending regularity of their habits, to
the monotony of egotism in which his father-in-law daily indulged, to the solitary walks
which his wife recommended, and the dull games of cards which, with the best intentions,
were prescribed for the occupation of his evenings.
But when every due allowance has been made for the tedium of his visits to
Seaham, and for the want of genial sympathy and cordial appreciation of his character in
all its strength and weakness displayed constantly by his wife, it is still, of course,
impossible to palliate the culpable folly which induced him to threaten her with acts of
violence, and to give the reins to his wanton love of mischief, when he must have seen that
his ill-chosen jests were entirely misunderstood. But, on the whole, it is difficult to
understand by what chain of reasoning Lady Byron
contrived to reconcile her sense of duty with the Apostolic injunction, ‘Let not
the wife depart from her husband.’ No one was more ready than Byron himself to admit his excessive irritability, and the
criminal extravagances into which his fondness for mystifying and startling others too
often betrayed him.
62 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
Hodgson, in his letter to Lady
Byron, was evidently authorised to express his friend’s deep sorrow
for ‘the occurrences which had so deeply wounded her,’ the most generous
acknowledgment of his admiration of her goodness, and the warmest affection. It was only
when her cold and immovable self-will had resolutely resisted all attempts at
reconciliation, and she had sanctioned by her silence the most infamous calumnies, that the
bitterness of his soul found a vent in satire against her whose memory, in his heart of
hearts, he cherished with tender regret until the day of his death.
With every attribute of moral excellence, enhanced by education and
restrained by the most absolute self-control, Lady
Byron’s otherwise perfect womanhood was marred and defaced by the want
of that one ‘sweet weakness,’ the divine power of forgiveness. Her
Christianity, otherwise complete, was rendered imperfect by the conspicuous absence of two
most essential qualities: the one humility, the other charity. It is impossible to imagine
that she ever entertained for her husband any feeling worthy of the sacred name of love,
any sentiment deeper than regard and interest. She herself states that she married him with
the settled determination to endure everything, and this is further corroborated by Mrs.
| POSSIBILITY OF RECONCILIATION. | 63 |
Leigh’s remark that ‘she (Lady
Byron) seemed to set about making him happy in the right way.’ But
what grounds had she for trusting so confidently to her own powers, what right had she to
stand before God’s altar and solemnly declare that she would love, honour, and obey
the man whom she had resolved merely to reform?
That Lady Byron did at first
contemplate a reunion as within the bounds of eventual possibility is proved by the
concluding sentence of those letters to Hodgson,
which, though enigmatical enough in parts, have yet sufficient clearness to prove the
vindictive spirit of wounded pride which prompted her to complete the massacre of her
lord’s moral nature by deliberately dissecting it, and which rendered all attempts at
reconciliation wholly ineffectual. But of such a reunion, if early effected, what might not
have been the results? Lady Byron might have been a happy wife and
mother, the honoured companion of the greatest genius of his age and country; while he
might have achieved a nobler fame as an orator, a statesman, and a philanthropist, even
than that imperishable glory which his own and all succeeding generations have accorded to
him as a poet. And what was the miserable alternative? To her a weary widowhood, during
which she continually
64 | MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON. | |
brooded over the subject of the separation until
the wild conjectures of others mingled with the strange hallucinations of her own troubled
fancy combined to produce a condition of mental delusion which her most intimate
acquaintances regarded as a species of monomania; to him the despair of that better life
for which his marriage had reawakened the desire, the severance of all home affections,
perpetual exile, utter desolation of spirit, a premature and lonely death in a strange
land.
From the part played in this terrible tragedy by his loving sister and by
the truest and most loyal of friends it is manifest that if anything could have averted the
impending disaster it would have been the judicious zeal of their united efforts in the
cause of affection and of friendship.
Mary Anne Clermont (d. 1850)
Lady Byron's governess and companion, who Byron accused of poisoning his marriage.
Scrope Berdmore Davies (1782-1852)
Byron met his bosom friend while at Cambridge. Davies, a professional gambler, lent Byron
funds to pay for his travels in Greece and Byron acted as second in Davies' duels.
William Fletcher (1831 fl.)
Byron's valet, the son of a Newstead tenant; he continued in service to the end of the
poet's life, after which he was pensioned by the family. He married Anne Rood, formerly
maid to Augusta Leigh, and was living in London in 1831.
John Hanson (1755-1841)
Byron's solicitor and business agent.
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).
Francis Hodgson (1781-1852)
Provost of Eton College, translator of Juvenal (1807) and close friend of Byron. He wrote
for the
Monthly and
Critical Reviews, and was
author of (among other volumes of poetry)
Childe Harold's Monitor; or
Lines occasioned by the last Canto of Childe Harold (1818).
Susanna Matilda Hodgson [née Tayler] (1791-1833)
Daughter of Archdale Wilson Tayler (1759-1814) who married Francis Hodgson in 1815. Her
sister Ann Caroline married Henry Drury and her sister Elizabeth married Robert
Bland.
Hon. Frederick Howard (1785-1815)
The son of Lord Carlisle; he was a major in the 10th Hussars killed the Battle of
Waterloo on 18 June 1815.
William Howitt (1792-1879)
Quaker poet and prolific miscellaneous writer.
Edmund Kean (1787-1833)
English tragic actor famous for his Shakespearean roles.
Lady Caroline Lamb [née Ponsonby] (1785-1828)
Daughter of the third earl of Bessborough; she married the Hon. William Lamb (1779-1848)
and fictionalized her infatuation with Lord Byron in her first novel,
Glenarvon (1816).
Hon. Augusta Mary Leigh [née Byron] (1783-1851)
Byron's half-sister; the daughter of Amelia Darcy, Baroness Conyers, she married
Lieutenant-Colonel George Leigh on 17 August 1807.
George Leigh (1771-1850)
Officer in the 10th Light Dragoons, gambler, and boon companion of the Prince of Wales;
he married Augusta Byron in 1807.
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
Joe Murray (d. 1820)
Byron's elderly steward at Newstead Abbey who had served under the previous lord
Byron.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Mary Ann Musters [née Chaworth] (1785-1832)
The grand-niece of the Chaworth who was killed by “Wicked Jack” Byron; she was the object
of Byron's affections before and after she married John Musters in 1805.
Henry William Paget, first marquess of Anglesey (1768-1854)
Originally Bayly, educated at Westminster and Christ Church, Oxford; he was MP
(1790-1810), commander of cavalry under Sir John Moore, lost a leg at Waterloo, and raised
to the peerage 1815; he was lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1828-29, 1830-33).
Sarah Siddons [née Kemble] (1755-1831)
English tragic actress, sister of John Philip Kemble, famous roles as Desdemona, Lady
Macbeth, and Ophelia. She retired from the stage in 1812.
Germaine de Staël (1766-1817)
French woman of letters; author of the novel
Corinne, ou L'Italie
(1807) and
De l'Allemagne (1811); banned from Paris by Napoleon, she
spent her later years living in Germany, Britain, and Switzerland.
Thomas Wildman (1787-1859)
Schoolfellow of Byron's at Harrow, purchaser and preserver of Newstead Abbey; he served
in the Peninsular War under Sir John Moore and was equerry to the Duke of Sussex.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.