LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Francis Hodgson to Samuel Rogers, December 1842
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Vol. 1 Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II. 1794-1807.
Chapter III. 1807-1808.
Chapter IV. 1808.
Chapter V. 1808-1809.
Chapter VI. 1810.
Chapter VII. 1811.
Chapter VIII. 1811.
Chapter IX. 1811.
Chapter X. 1811-12.
Chapter XI. 1812.
Chapter XII. 1812-13.
Chapter XIII. 1813-14.
Vol. 2 Contents
Chapter XIV. 1815-16.
Chapter XV. 1816-18.
Chapter XVI. 1815-22.
Chapter XVII. 1820.
Chapter XVIII. 1824-27.
Chapter XIX. 1827-1830
Chapter XX. 1830-36.
Chapter XXI. 1837-40.
Chapter XXII. 1840-47.
Chapter XXIII. 1840-52.
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 

It is with something like fear and trembling that one even approaches such an argument as that which you suggested last night. But I could not prevent my thoughts from recurring to the defect in Milton’s answer to the supposed difficulty of creation without the choice of the created; and I would venture to ask whether a less unsatisfactory answer may not be found in some such reflections as the following. First, that the blessing was conferred upon such easy conditions as we cannot imagine any being endowed with reason to have refused, could they have been previously proposed to him; and, secondly, when the blessing was

1 This picture is now in the Lodge at Eton.

274 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
forfeited, there was the further unutterable mercy of the Son of God Himself coming into the world to remedy the evil, and to say to us again, ‘Take My yoke upon you, for My yoke is easy and My burden is light,’—thus proposing a choice which the necessity of the case precluded before; and, at the same time, promising us sufficient assistance to do whatever He enjoins. In a word, the whole must be viewed together to enable us to solve any part of the very first difficulty; nor is this surprising when we consider whose purposes they are which we are endeavouring to penetrate.

I am aware of the imperfect development of all this, but thought it less unbecoming than entire silence; and if I am mistaken in that opinion, still I am convinced you will not regard it as presumptuous. . . . . By the words ‘imperfect development,’ I mean that the difficulty of the permission of evil is not touched upon, nor the usual solution of that difficulty, namely, that you cannot even conceive the probation of a moral and intellectual being without such a permission, and upon the notion of a trial or probation the whole history of man, as given in the Bible, is founded; a notion corroborated by every day’s experience, and by the consciousness of every reasonable being.