LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Charles Webb Le Bas to Francis Hodgson, 25 June 1845
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Vol. 1 Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II. 1794-1807.
Chapter III. 1807-1808.
Chapter IV. 1808.
Chapter V. 1808-1809.
Chapter VI. 1810.
Chapter VII. 1811.
Chapter VIII. 1811.
Chapter IX. 1811.
Chapter X. 1811-12.
Chapter XI. 1812.
Chapter XII. 1812-13.
Chapter XIII. 1813-14.
Vol. 2 Contents
Chapter XIV. 1815-16.
Chapter XV. 1816-18.
Chapter XVI. 1815-22.
Chapter XVII. 1820.
Chapter XVIII. 1824-27.
Chapter XIX. 1827-1830
Chapter XX. 1830-36.
Chapter XXI. 1837-40.
Chapter XXII. 1840-47.
Chapter XXIII. 1840-52.
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
June 25, 1845.

My dear Mr. Provost,—My remarks on Hildebrand were written purely from my somewhat imperfect recollections of his history, and without any reference to books. I have since, however, perused a very striking and instructive paper in the ‘Edinburgh Review,’ touching that same gigantic mind, which you, most probably, have likewise seen. If not, I would recommend you to lose no time in procuring it. It is, I believe, in the very last number, and, I have very little doubt, is the production of Stephen,
294 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
of the Colonial Office. In some respects it confirms my own view of the character of Gregory VII., for it gives him full credit for an unclouded persuasion of the truth of his Theocratic System, and of the perfect legitimacy of his own pretensions. How any man, or any set of men, could form such a theory, with the Scriptures open before them, it is next to impossible for us at this day to imagine; and yet the 350 extant letters of Gregory seem to indicate that he had no more doubt about the matter than of the Divine origin of Christianity itself. The reviewer is further of opinion that, whatever mischiefs may have been inflicted on society by this stupendous system, the evil was not altogether unmixed; and that, in the absence of some such antagonist force, the reign of brute violence might have been perpetual, and the greater part of the European population might have remained in a state of serfdom, to this very hour. But, be all this as it may, the name of Hildebrand ought never to be mentioned by a teacher of history, without pointed condemnation of the system, whatever allowance may be made for the man. His atrocious and vindictive ill-usage of the emperor ought, more especially, to be visited with unsparing reprobation.