LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Memoir of Francis Hodgson
Charles Webb Le Bas to Francis Hodgson, March 1850
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Vol. 1 Contents
Chapter I.
Chapter II. 1794-1807.
Chapter III. 1807-1808.
Chapter IV. 1808.
Chapter V. 1808-1809.
Chapter VI. 1810.
Chapter VII. 1811.
Chapter VIII. 1811.
Chapter IX. 1811.
Chapter X. 1811-12.
Chapter XI. 1812.
Chapter XII. 1812-13.
Chapter XIII. 1813-14.
Vol. 2 Contents
Chapter XIV. 1815-16.
Chapter XV. 1816-18.
Chapter XVI. 1815-22.
Chapter XVII. 1820.
Chapter XVIII. 1824-27.
Chapter XIX. 1827-1830
Chapter XX. 1830-36.
Chapter XXI. 1837-40.
Chapter XXII. 1840-47.
Chapter XXIII. 1840-52.
Index
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 

Will Lord Denman permit me to take this opportunity of most respectfully expressing the unaffected gratification with which I have listened to the chorus of applause and admiration, which rung throughout the length and breadth of the land, in honour of his retirement from public life? It is scarcely possible to imagine a more enviable termination to a long career of useful and arduous service. . . . .

314 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.

Your copious and welcome dispatch makes me quite ashamed of my poor, meagre, starveling missive! I have received χρύσεα χαλκείων, έκατόμβοιʹ έννεαβοίων. I hasten to acknowledge how much I remain your debtor. I can scarcely describe to you how much we were all annoyed and troubled by the complication of circumstances which have disabled your admirable Magister Informator from accepting the position, so frankly and honourably tendered to him. The large heart, the open hand, the princely taste for literary treasure—these have been his faults—if faults they can be deemed. I can regard them only as the excuses of a noble spirit. Only if there be such a bump in craniology as the bump of calculation, one can hardly help wishing that such bump had been somewhat more amply developed in his phrenology! The disappointment, I dare say, will not break his manly spirit. But, the continued anxiety and toil! How many years longer will the physical man be able to bear up against that incessant demand? Be all this as it may, I beseech you to offer him the expression of my most respectful and most cordial wishes and regards.

The great pending question has, of course,
ROMAN CATHOLIC DISSENT.315
occupied much of my thoughts, as it has occupied and absorbed the thoughts of every one capable of thinking at all. And I am often out of the body with impatience at the brutish perverseness of some, who are eternally chattering about the sacred principles of toleration; as if Romish Dissent were in all respects similar to any other form of Dissent! It is a Dissent entirely sui generis. Ultramontane Romanism dissents from us, just as
Czar Nicholas dissents from all factious and insurgent Poles! Whoever dreams of persecuting or molesting the Romanists merely because they adore the Virgin Mary, or believe in the Sacrifice of Mass, etc. etc. etc.? No; all we now specifically want is to muzzle the Papacy—even as our Roman Catholic forefathers did! The Papacy is a politico-religious monster. Whether it be the Apocalyptic Beast or not, a beast it is, which ought to have a bridle in its jaws and a hook in its nostrils. And, with the exception of ourselves, every State in Europe, Romish or Protestant, holds the bridle and the hook in its hands. I hope it is true that our glorious little Queen is full of indignation at this intolerable insult. I cordially sympathise with your just and generous feelings towards the Church of Ireland. But alas! our statesmanship (whether Whig or
316 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
Tory) is so terribly manacled by the tenor of our antecedent legislation and policy! It has all but ignored the Papacy. It might almost as wisely have ignored
Napoleon.

Finally, you love golden words dearly, I know. Here are a very few, which I have lately met with, from the once world-famous Pico di Mirandola:—
Veritatem Philosophia quaerit.
Theologia invenit.
Religio possidet.

The year 1851 bids fair to be an Annus Mirabilis indeed! To say nothing of Crystal Palaces, and monster toy-shops, and Œcumenical Councils of the human race, it seems likely to be eternally infamous for the triumph of triple crowns and red hats! The infatuation or the perfidy of our statesmen and Parliamentary counsellors almost surpasses belief. When, in short, was there ever such a labyrinth of follies and blunders? And what—humanly speaking—but a dissolution offers the smallest chance of extrication from it? A much longer continuance of such an interregnum of confusion must be almost enough to render Parliament contemptible in the eyes of the people.

I do not know whether you are aware of a very remarkable and original speech, delivered in the
A SPANISH ’MONTALEMBERT.’317
Spanish Chamber of Deputies, on the 30th January, 1850, and since translated into English, and published at Liverpool; price (I believe) sixpence? If you have not seen it, let me recommend you to procure it. Its title is, ‘
General Condition of Europe; by Donoso Cortes, Marquess de Valdegamas.’ It is full of the direst vaticinations. But the prophet appears to stand upon a most commanding Pisgah; from which position he takes a survey of the destinies of the civilised world. Some things there are in this terrible ‘burden of the Lord,’ which, I confess, are beyond me! Nevertheless, the words of the seer cause the ears to tingle, and the heart to melt like wax within us! One most striking utterance of the oracle is, that the only hope of Europe is in the Church and the Army. ‘What would become of the world of civilisation,’ he exclaims, ‘were there neither priests nor soldiers?’ But do look at the speech, and judge for yourself. One thing must be recollected, the man is evidently an Ultramontane Romanist, though a profoundly intelligent and sincere one. He seems to be the Montalembert of Spain; but I suspect of a still mightier calibre than the Frenchman. . . . .

Well,—and now for the year 1852! A happy
318 MEMOIR OF REV. F. HODGSON.
new year! Dare we venture to hope it? Alas! all the good wishes immemorially appropriate to the season are well nigh forced to assume the negative form of deprecation: e.g. may Heaven graciously preserve us from such Christmas pudding, pie, and snap-dragon, as that which now enters so copiously into the bill of fare of Parisian entertainment!

But the Coup d’État!—had you any conception that Napoleon III. was such an Olympian wielder of the thunder-hammer? Waiving all question as to the moral and political merits or demerits of this tour de force, it is impossible to deny the consummate mastery of its execution. Never did the bolts of Heaven fall more suddenly. On the 18th Brumaire, An. viii, Napoleon I. exclaimed, ‘I am the God of thunder.’ But, all things considered, what was his thunder compared with that of his nephew? And, then, comes the question,—What does the thunder portend to us, and to all Christendom? We scarcely dare to ask ourselves. It really seems as if the vast Political Pendulum were destined to swing tempestuously, backwards and forwards, between Despotism and Anarchy, to the very ‘crack of doom,’ without ever resting for a moment at the safe intermediate point of Consti-
NAPOLEON III.319
tutional Government. In the meantime, however, let us rejoice gratefully—albeit not wholly without trembling—in the peaceful blessings which, hitherto, are vouchsafed to ourselves, and strive to show that we are not wholly unworthy of their continuance.

Most devoutly is it to be wished that your version of the Dictator’s ambition may be the right one. He may, doubtless, himself aspire to a higher glory than that of ‘my uncle’—the glory of being immortalised as the Napoleon of Peace. But will the Army let him? Will they be content with the honours of a vast Police, with bayonets in their hands instead of constable’s staves? Alas! my dreams are of Armageddon! A huge thundercloud seems to be hovering over Europe, and who can think of its bursting without terror?