LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

Conversations on Religion, with Lord Byron
James Kennedy to W. de la C., Esq., November 1823
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Prelude
First Conversation
Kennedy on Scripture
Second Conversation
Third Conversation
Fourth Conversation
Fifth Conversation
Memoir of Byron
Byron’s Character
Appendix
Notes
Memorandum
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
Cephalonia, Nov. 1823.

“I continued with the officers who met with me, for five or six weeks, generally twice a week. At length I was placed in charge of the hospital—one or two got tired, I suppose, and did not attend—though they say they are still ready.

“After the first meeting, at which his lordship was present, he went into the country. For a long time I did not go out to visit him, as I could not perceive that I was called on to intrude my instructions on him; because, if he were in earnest, he could easily have informed me. Besides, my heavy duty at the hospital also prevented me for some time. I have now been out to Metaxata several times, and I regret that I did not go sooner. . . . . .

“I have now mentioned generally what I am doing with Lord B.; a particular account would not be compatible with the limits of a letter. There have been so many ridiculous stories spread about in the various islands, that I have no doubt but that some of them will reach the London papers. As his lordship is frank and confidential, I do not mention to any here the particulars of our interviews, for reasons arising both from the object I have in view, as well as from the circumstances in which his lordship is placed. It becomes us, therefore, to allow nothing to go forth to the world, which would appear to have had its origin with me, though distorted by the
424APPENDIX
various channels through which it had passed—as it would indicate a degree of vanity which would frustrate the desirable object, and destroy that high opinion which he has formed of the purity of my principles, and the real and sincere disinterestedness of my views. . . . . . I have, therefore, in all my correspondence, mentioned in one sentence, that I have had some interesting conversations with him. As, however, I trust entirely and unreservedly in you, as one friend ought to do with another—though indeed I would not trust all my friends as I do you—I shall, in my next, give a full and particular view of his lordship’s mind, and the nature and the results of our conversations. . . . .

“After all, in reality, it may strike you that this is being too cautious. I grant that the result may show that it is so, but at present I think not. In fact, there is nothing different in him from other unconverted men whom we daily see, except that he is a lord, and a great and wicked poet. I shall, I trust, do my duty towards him, leaving it, as we ought, in faith and humility. You know that I am not a timid man, nor afraid to speak my sentiments. I have done it freely to Lord B.; and while I have not forgotten the respect due to him, neither have I forgotten that he is a sinner,—and a great one,—and that he stands in immediate need of a Saviour. The books he reads are your old friend’s. . . . . I am not deterred from doing what good I can, though some here think his lordship is not sincere, and that he only wants to hear the cant phrases of the saints, and learn their
APPENDIX425
opinions, in order that he may hereafter introduce them. It may possibly be so, but I do not believe it; and even though it were, I will visit and write to his lordship, and only regret that I did not do so before. No ridicule will ever frighten me; and were this his intention, he is not the first man who commenced in ridicule, and terminated in earnest. Mention, therefore, what I have written, only to ——

W. de la C., Esq.