The Life of Lord Byron
Front Matter
THE
LIFE
OF
LORD BYRON:
BY JOHN GALT, ESQ.
LONDON:
HENRY COLBURN AND RICHARD BENTLEY,
NEW BURLINGTON STREET.
1830.
PREFACE.
The letters and journals of Lord Byron,
with the interwoven notes of
Mr. Moore, should have
superseded the utility of writing any other account of that extraordinary man. The
compilation has, however, not proved satisfactory, and the consequence, almost of
necessity, is, that many other biographical portraits of the noble poet may yet be
expected; but will they materially alter the general effect of Mr.
Moore’s work? I think not; and have accordingly confined myself, as
much as practicable, consistent with the end in view, to an outline of his Lordship’s
intellectual features—a substratum only of the general mass of his character.
If
Mr. Moore has evinced too
eager an anxiety to set out the best qualities of his friend to the brightest advantage, it
ought to be recollected that no less was expected of him. The spirit of the times ran
strong against Lord Byron, as a man; and it was natural, that
Mr. Moore should attempt to stem the tide. I respect the
generosity with which he has executed his task. I think that he has made no striking
misre-
presentation; I even discern but little exaggeration,
although he has amiably chosen to paint only the sunny side: the limning is correct; but
the likeness is too radiant and conciliatory.
There is one point with respect to the subsequent pages, on which I
think it unnecessary to offer any explanation—the separation of Lord and
Lady Byron. I have avoided, as much as I well could, every
thing like the expression of an opinion on the subject.
Mr.
Moore has done all in his power to excuse his Lordship; and Lady
Byron has protested against the correctness of his statement, without
however assigning any reason for her own conduct, calculated to satisfy the public, who
have been too indecorously, I conceive, made parties to the question.
But I should explain that in omitting to notice the rancour with which
Lord Byron was pursued by
Dr.
Southey, I have always considered his Lordship as the first aggressor. The
affair is therefore properly comprehended in the general observations respecting the
enemies whom the satire of
English Bards and Scotch
Reviewers provoked. I may add further, in explanation, that I did not conceive
any particular examination was required of his Lordship’s minor poems, nor of his
part in the controversy concerning the poetical genius of
Pope.
Considering how much the conduct of Lord Byron has
been in question, perhaps I ought to state, that I never stood on such a footing with his
Lordship as to
inspire me with any sentiment likely to bias my
judgment. I am indebted to him for no other favours than those which a well-bred person of
rank bestows in the interchange of civility on a man who is of none, and that I do not
undervalue the courtesy with which he ever treated me, will probably be apparent. I am
gratified with the recollection of having known a person so celebrated, and I believe
myself incapable of intentional injustice. I can only regret the impression he made upon
me, if it shall be thought I have spoken of him with prejudice.
It will be seen by a note, relative to a circumstance which took place
in Lord Byron’s conduct towards the
Countess Guiccioli, that
Mr.
Hobhouse has enabled me to give two versions of an affair not regarded by
some of that lady’s relations as having been marked by generosity; but I could not
expunge from the text what I had stated, having no reason to doubt the authenticity of my
information. The reader is enabled to form his own opinion on the subject.
I cannot conclude without offering my best acknowledgements to the
learned and ingenious
Mr. Nicolas, for the curious
genealogical fact of a baton sinister being in the escutcheon of the Byrons of Newstead.
Lord Byron, in his pride of birth, does not appear to have been
aware of this stain.
N. B. Since this work was completed, a
small pamphlet, judiciously suppressed, has been
placed in
my hands, dated from the Chateau de Blonai, 20th August,
1825, in which
Mr. Medwin vindicates the correctness
of those statements in his conversations with Lord Byron, which
Mr. Hobhouse had impugned in
The Westminster Review. Had I seen it before expressing
my opinion of Mr. Medwin’s publication, I am not sure it would
have in any degree affected that opinion, which was formed without reference to the errors
imputed by Mr. Hobhouse.
London, 12th August, 1830.
CONTENTS.
Page
Introduction 1
CHAPTER I.
Ancient descent—Pedigree—Birth—Troubles of his
mother—Early Education—Accession to the title. 5
CHAPTER II.
Moral effects of local scenery; a peculiarity in taste—Early
love—Impressions and traditions. 14
CHAPTER III.
Arrival at Newstead—Find it in ruins—The old Lord and his
beetles—The Earl of Carlisle becomes the guardian of
Byron—The poet’s acute sense of his own deformed
foot—His mother consults a fortuneteller. 23
CHAPTER IV.
Placed at Harrow—Progress there—Love for Miss
Chatworth—His reading—Oratorical powers. 31
CHAPTER V.
Character at Harrow—Poetical predilections at Cambridge—His Hours of Idleness. 39
CHAPTER VI.
Criticism of the Edinburgh Review. 41
Page
CHAPTER VII.
Effect of the criticism in the Edinburgh
Review—English Bards and Scotch
Reviewers—His satiety—Intention to travel—Publishes his
Satire—Takes his seat in the House of Lords—Departs for Lisbon; thence to
Gibraltar. 53
CHAPTER VIII.
First acquaintance with Byron—Embark
together—The voyage. 59
CHAPTER IX.
Dinner at the ambassador’s at Cagliari—Opera—Disaster of
Byron at Malta—Mrs. Spencer Smith. 65
CHAPTER X.
Sails from Malta to Prevesa—Lands at Patras—Sails
Again—Passes Ithaca—Arrival at Prevesa—Salona—Joannina—Zitza.
70
CHAPTER XI.
Halt at Zitza—The river Acheron—Greek wine—A Greek
chariot—Arrival at Tepellené—The vizier’s palace. 77
CHAPTER XII.
Audience appointed with Ali Pashaw—Description of
the vizier’s person—My audience of the Vizier of the Morea. 82
CHAPTER XIII.
The effect of Ali Pashaw’s character on
Lord Byron—Sketch of the career of Ali,
and the perseverance with which he pursued the objects of his ambition. 88
CHAPTER XIV.
Leave Joannina for Prevesa—Land at
Fanari-Albania—Byron’s character of the inhabitants.
93
CHAPTER XV.
Leave Utraikee—Dangerous pass in the woods—Catoona—Quarrel
between the guard and primate of the
village—Makala-Gouri—Missolonghi—Parnassus. 99
CHAPTER XVI.
Vostizza—Battle of Lepanto—Parnassus—Livadia—Cave of
Trophonius—The fountains of Oblivion and
memory—Chæronéa—Thebes—Athens. 104
Page
CHAPTER XVII.
Byron’s character of the modern Athenians—Visit to
Eleusis—Visit to the Caverns at Vary and Keraéta—Lost in the labyrinths of
the latter. 109
CHAPTER XVIII.
Proceed from Keraéta to Cape Colonna—Associations connected with
the spot—Second hearing of the Albanians—Journey to Marathon—Effect of
his adventures on the mind of the Poet—Return to Athens—I join the travellers
there—Maid of Athens. 115
CHAPTER XIX.
Occupation at Athens—Mount Pentilicus—We descend into the
caverns—Return to Athens—A Greek contract of marriage—Various Athenian
and Albanian superstitions—Effect of their impression on the genius of the poet. 120
CHAPTER XX.
Local pleasures—Byron’s Grecian
poems—His departure from Athens—Description of evening in the Corsair—The opening of the Giaour—State of patriotic feeling then in Greece—Smyrna—Change in
Lord Byron’s manners. 126
CHAPTER XXI.
Smyrna—The sport of the Djerid—Journey to Ephesus—The dead
city—The desolate country—The ruins and obliteration of the temple—The
slight impression of all on Byron. 133
CHAPTER XXII.
Embarks for Constantinople—Touches at Tenedos—Visits Alexandria
Troas—The Trojan plain—Swims the Hellespont—Arrival at Constantinople.
138
CHAPTER XXIII.
Constantinople—Description—The dogs and the dead—Landed at
Tophana—The masterless dogs—The slave-market—The seraglio—The
defects in the description. 146
CHAPTER XXIV.
Dispute with the ambassador—Reflections on
Byron’s pride of rank—Abandons his Oriental
travels—Re-embarks in the Salsette—The
dagger-scene—Zea—Returns to Athens—Tour in the Morea—Dangerous
illness—Return to Athens—The adventure on which the Giaour is founded. 153
Page
CHAPTER XXV.
Arrival in London—Mr. Dallas’s
patronage—Arranges for the publication of Childe
Harold—The death of Mrs. Byron: his sorrow—His
affair with Mr. Moore—Their meeting at Mr.
Roger’s house, and friendship. 159
CHAPTER XXVI.
The libel in the Scourge—The general
impression of his character—Improvements in his manners as his merit was acknowledged
by the public—His address in management—His first speech in
parliament—The Publication of Childe Harold—Its
reception and effect. 168
CHAPTER XXVII.
Sketches of character—His friendly dispositions—Introduce Prince
K——to him—Our last interview—His continued kindness towards
me—Instance of it to one of my friends. 174
CHAPTER XXVIII.
A miff with Lord Byron—Remarkable
coincidences—Plagiarisms of his Lordship. 180
CHAPTER XXIX.
Lord Byron in 1813—The Lady’s Tragedy—Miss
Milbanke—Growing uneasiness of Lord Byron’s
mind —The friar’s ghosts—The marriage—A member of the Drury-lane
committee—Embarrassed affairs—The separation. 186
CHAPTER XXX.
Reflections on his domestic verses—Consideration of his
works—The Corsair—Probabilities of the character
and incidents of the story—On the difference between poetical invention and moral
experience, illustrated by the difference between the genius of
Shakspeare and that of Byron. 196
CHAPTER XXXI.
Byron determines to reside abroad—Visits the plain of
Waterloo—State of his feelings. 204
CHAPTER XXXII.
Byron’s residence in Switzerland—Excursion to the
Glaciers—Manfred founded on a magical sacrifice, not on
guilt—Similarity between sentiments given to Manfred, and those
expressed by Lord Byron in his own person. 211
Page
CHAPTER XXIII.
State of Byron in Switzerland—He goes to
Venice—The fourth canto of Childe Harold—Rumination
on his own condition—Beppo—Lament
of Tasso—Curious example of Byron’s
metaphysical love. 219
CHAPTER XXXIV.
Removes to Ravenna—The Countess Guiccioli. 225
CHAPTER XXXV.
Residence in Ravenna—The
Carbonari—Byron’s part in their plot—The murder
of the military commandant—The poetical use of the incident—Marino Faliero—Reflections—The Prophecy of
Dante. 229
CHAPTER XXXVI.
The tragedy of Sardanapalus considered with
reference to Lord Byron’s own circumstances—Cain. 235
CHAPTER XXXVII.
Removal to Pisa—The Lanfranchi Palace—Affair with the guard at
Pisa—Removal to Monte Nero—Junction with Mr.
Hunt—Mr. Shelley’s letter. 243
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
Mr. Hunt arrives in Italy—Meeting with Lord
Byron—Tumults in the house—Arrangements for Mr.
Hunt’s family—Extent of his obligations to Lord
Byron—Their copartnery—Meanness of the whole business. 249
CHAPTER XXXIX.
Mr. Shelley—Sketch of his life—His death—The burning
of his body, and the return of the mourners. 255
CHAPTER XI.
The Two Foscari—Werner—The Deformed Transformed—Don Juan—The Liberal—Removes
from Pisa to Genoa. 260
CHAPTER XLI.
Genoa—Change in the manners of Lord
Byron—Residence at the Casa Saluzzi—The
Liberal—Remarks on the poet’s works in general, and on
Hunt’s strictures on his character. 268
Page
CHAPTER XLII.
Lord Byron resolves to join the Greeks—Arrives at
Cephalonia—Greek factions—Sends emissaries to the Grecian Chiefs—Writes
to London about the loan—To Mavrocordato on the
dissensions—Embarks at last for Missolonghi. 273
CHAPTER XLIII.
Lord Byron’s conversations on religion with Dr.
Kennedy. 280
CHAPTER XLIV.
Voyage to Cephalonia—Letter—Count
Gamba’s address—Grateful feelings of the Turks—Endeavours
of Lord Byron to mitigate the horrors of the war. 294
CHAPTER XLV.
Proceedings at Missolonghi—Byron’s Suliote
brigade—Their insubordination—Difference with Colonel
Stanhope—Imbecility of the plans for the independence of Greece. 300
CHAPTER XLVI.
Lord Byron appointed to the command of three thousand men to besiege
Lepanto—The siege abandoned for a blockade—Advanced guard ordered to
proceed—Lord Byron’s first illness—A
riot—He is urged to leave Greece—The expedition against Lepanto
abandoned—Byron dejected—A wild diplomatic scheme.
306
CHAPTER XLVII.
The last illness and death of Lord Byron—His last
poem. 312
CHAPTER XLVIII.
The funeral preparations and final obsequies. 320
CHAPTER XLIX.
Character of Lord Byron. 324
Appendix. 331
Leigh Hunt,
Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries (London: Henry Colburn, 1828)
An article was
written in “The Westminster
Review” (Medwin says
by Mr. Hobhouse) to show that the Conversations were altogether unworthy of
credit. There are doubtless many inaccuracies in the latter; but the spirit remains
undoubted; and the author of the criticism was only vexed, that such was the fact. He
assumes, that Lord Byron could not have made this or that statement to
Captain Medwin, because the statement was erroneous or untrue; but
an anonymous author has no right to be believed in preference to one who speaks in his own
name: there is nothing to show that Mr. Hobhouse might not have been
as mistaken about a date or an epigram as Mr. Medwin; and when we find
him giving us his own version of a fact, and Mr. Medwin asserting that
Lord Byron gave him another, the only impression left upon the
mind of any body who knew his Lordship is, that the fault most probably lay in the loose
corners of the noble Poet’s vivacity. Such is the impression made upon the author of
an unpublished Letter to Mr.
Hobhouse, which has been shown me in print; and he had a right to it. The
reviewer, to my knowledge, is mistaken upon some points, as well as the person he reviews.
The assumption, that nobody can know any thing about Lord Byron but
two or three persons who were conversant with him for a certain space of time, and whom he
spoke of with as little ceremony, and would hardly treat with more confidence than he did a
hundred others, is ludicrous; and can only end, as the criticism has done, in doing no good
either to him or them. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
“Dear Sir;—Amongst the
agreeable things which you say of me in your life of Lord Byron, you conjecture that I
‘condemned’
Childe Harold
previously to its publication. There is not the slightest foundation for this
supposition—nor is it true as you state, ‘that I was the only person
who had seen the poem in manuscript, as I was with Lord
Byron whilst he was writing it.’ I had left
Lord Byron before he had finished the two cantos, and,
excepting a few fragments, I had never seen them until they were printed. My own
persuasion is, that the story told in Dallas’s Recollections of some
person, name unknown, having dissuaded Lord Byron from
publishing Childe Harold, is a
mere fabrication, for it is at complete variance with all Lord
Byron himself told me on the subject. At any rate, I was not that
person; if I had been, it is not very likely that the poem which I had endeavoured
to stifle in its birth, should, in its complete, or, as Lord
Byron says, in its ‘concluded state,’ be dedicated to
me. I must, therefore, request you will take the earliest opportunity of relieving
me from this imputation, which, so far as a man can be written down by any other
author than himself, cannot fail to produce a very prejudicial effect, and to give
me more uneasiness than I think it can be your wish to inflict on any man who has
never given you provocation or excuse for injustice. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
I am glad to find my college
stories administered relief to your nerves, when we were together in the Malta
packet some one and twenty years ago; and I am not sorry that my wearing a red
coat at Cagliari, and cutting my finger in the quarries of Pentelicus, should
have furnished materials for your present volume; but to repay me for having
supplied these timely episodes, as well as for your copious extracts from my
travels in Albania, and also for inserting my note about Madame Guiccioli without my leave, you must
positively cancel the passage respecting Childe Harold
in page 161 of your little volume. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
I wonder that even common policy did not induce you to be
more cautious in making statements which might be so easily disproved, and
which have, indeed, been already incontrovertibly refuted. The very
conversation, which you have judiciously selected from Medwin, as one of those parts of his trumpery book to the truth of which you
can speak, I know to be a lie; for I never went the tour of the lake of Geneva
with Lord Byron. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
You tell me that your wish has
been to give only an outline of his intellectual character. I am at a loss to
understand how your gossip about him and me, and the silly anecdotes you have
copied from very discreditable authorities, can be said to be fairly comprised
in such an outline. But your plan ought certainly to have compelled you to make
yourself thoroughly acquainted with his poetry, and to quote him just as he
wrote. Nevertheless, you have misrepresented him at least nine times in the ten
stanzas of that poem which you call the last, and which was not the last, he
ever wrote. Oh, for shame! stick to your acknowledged fictions—there you
are safe—you may deal with Leddy
Grippy and Laurie Todd as
you please, but not with those who have really lived, or who are still
alive. . . .
[John Wilson et. al.],
“Noctes Ambrosianae XVII” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 16
No. 94 (November 1824)
And there was another funny thing o’ his, till a queer looking lad, one
Mr. Skeffington, that wrote a tragedy, that was called
“The Mysterious Bride,” the whilk
thing made the Times newspaper for once witty—for it
said no more o’t, than just “Last night a play called The Mysterious
Bride, by the Honorable Mr. Skeffington, was performed at Drury Lane.
The piece was damned.” Weel, ye see it happened that there was a masquerade some nights after,
and Mr. Cam Hobhouse gaed till’t in the disguise
o’ a Spanish nun, that had been ravished by the French army— . . .
Teresa Guiccioli (1800-1873)
Byron's lover, who in 1818 married Alessandro Guiccioli. She composed a memoir of Byron,
Lord Byron,
Jugé par les Témoines de sa Vie (1868).
John Cam Hobhouse, baron Broughton (1786-1869)
Founder of the Cambridge Whig Club; traveled with Byron in the orient, radical MP for
Westminster (1820); Byron's executor; after a long career in politics published
Some Account of a Long Life (1865) later augmented as
Recollections of a Long Life, 6 vols (1909-1911).
Thomas Medwin (1788-1869)
Lieutenant of dragoons who was with Byron and Shelley at Pisa; the author of
Conversations of Lord Byron (1824) and
The Life of
Percy Bysshe Shelley, 2 vols (1847).
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
Sir Nicholas Harris Nicolas (1799-1848)
English antiquary and editor; he contributed extensively to the
Gentleman's Magazine and co-edited the
Retrospective
Review with Henry Southern.
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
Thomas Medwin (1788-1869)
Hobhouse Pamphlet. (London: Colburn, 1825). Medwin's response to Hobhouse's review of his
Conversations was
printed by Henry Colburn and then suppressed. Although it was seen by Leigh Hunt and John
Galt, no copy appears to have survived.