The Life of Lord Byron
Newstead Abbey
NEWSTEAD ABBEY.
The figure which this ancient edifice cuts in the memoirs, as
well as in the works of the poet, and having given a view of it in the vignette, make it
almost essential that this work should contain some account of it. I am indebted to
Lake’s Life of Lord Byron for the following particulars:
“This Abbey was founded in the year 1170, by Henry II., as a Priory of Black Canons, and dedicated to the Virgin Mary.
It continued in the family of the Byrons until the time of our poet,
who sold it first to Mr. Claughton, for the sum of
140,000l., and on that gentleman’s not being able to
fulfil the agreement, and paying 20,000l. of a forfeit, it was
afterwards sold to another person, and most of the money vested in trustees, for the
jointure of Lady Byron. The greater part of the edifice
still remains. The present possessor, Major Wildman,
is, with genuine taste, repairing this beautiful specimen of gothic architecture. The late
Lord Byron repaired a considerable part of it, but
forgetting the roof, he turned his attention to the inside, and the consequence was, that
in a few years, the rain penetrating to the apartments, soon destroyed all those elegant
devices which his Lordship contrived. Lord Byron’s own study was
a neat little apartment, decorated with some good classic busts, a select collection of
books, an antique cross, a sword in a gilt case, and at the end of the room two
finely-polished skulls, on a pair of light fancy stands. In the garden likewise, there was
a great number of these skulls, taken from the burial-ground of the Abbey, and piled up
together, but they were afterwards recommitted to the earth. A writer, who visited it soon
after Lord Byron had sold it, says, ‘In one corner of the
servants’ hall lay a stone coffin,
in which were
fencing-gloves and foils, and on the walls of the ample, but cheerless kitchen, was
painted, in large letters, ‘waste not—want not.’ During the minority
of Lord Byron, the Abbey was in the possession of Lord G——, his hounds, and divers colonies of
jackdaws, swallows, and starlings. The internal traces of this Goth were swept away,
but without, all appeared as rude and unreclaimed as he could have left it. With the
exception of the dog’s tomb, a conspicuous and elegant object, I do not recollect
the slightest trace of culture or improvement. The late
lord, a stern and desperate character, who is never mentioned by the
neighbouring peasants without a significant shake of the head, might have returned and
recognised every thing about him, except perhaps an additional crop of weeds. There
still slept that old pond, into which he is said to have hurled his lady in one of his
fits of fury, whence she was rescued by the gardener, a courageous blade, who was his
lord’s master, and chastised him for his barbarity. There still, at the end of
the garden, in a grove of oak, are two towering satyrs, he with his goat and club, and
Mrs. Satyr with her chubby cloven-footed brat, placed on pedestals, at the
intersections of the narrow and gloomy pathways, strike for a moment, with their grim
visages and silent shaggy forms, the fear into your bosom, which is felt by the
neighbouring peasantry, at ‘th’ oud laird’s devils.’ I have
frequently asked the country people what sort of a man his Lordship (our Lord
Byron) was. The impression of his eccentric but energetic character was
evident in the reply. ‘He’s the devil of a fellow for comical
fancies—he flag’s th’ oud laird to nothing, but he’s a hearty
good fellow for all that.’”
Horace Walpole (Earl of
Orford), who had visited Newstead, gives, in his usual bitter sarcastic manner,
the following account of it:
“As I returned, I saw Newstead an Althorp. I
like both. The former is the very abbey. The great east window of the church remains, and
connects with the house; the hall entire; the refectory entire; the cloister untouched,
with the ancient cistern of the convent, and their arms on it; it has a private chapel,
quite perfect. The park, which is still charming, has not been so much unprofaned. The
present Lord has lost large sums, and paid part in
old oaks, five thousand pounds’ worth of which have been cut near to the house. En revench, he has built two baby-forts to pay his country in
castles, for damage done to the navy, and planted a handful of Scotch firs, that look like
ploughboys dressed in old family liveries for a public day. In the hall is a very good
collection of pictures, all animals. The refectory, now the great drawing-room, is full of
Byrons: the vaulted roof remaining, but the windows have new
dresses making for them by a Venetian tailor.”
The following detailed description of Byron’s paternal abode, is extracted from “A visit to Newstead Abbey in 1828,” in The London Literary Gazette:
“It was on the noon of a cold bleak day in February, that I set out
to visit the memorable abbey of Newstead, once the property and abode of the immortal
Byron. The gloomy state of the weather, and the
dreary aspect of the surrounding country, produced impressions more appropriate to the
views of such a spot, than the cheerful season and scenery of summer. The estate lies on
the left hand side of the high north road, eight miles beyond Nottingham; but, as I
approached the place, I looked in vain for some indication of the abbey. Nothing is seen
but a thick plantation of young larch and firs, bordering the road, until you arrive at the
hut, a small public-house by the wayside. Nearly opposite to this is a plain white gate,
without lodges, opening into the park; before stands a fine spreading oak, one of the few
remaining trees of Sherwood forest, the famous haunt
of Robin Hood and his associates, which once covered all this
part of the country, and whose county was about the domain of Newstead. To this oak, the
only one of any size on the estate, Byron was very partial. It is
pretty well known that his great uncle (to whom he succeeded) cut down almost all the
valuable timber; so that, when Byron came into possession of the estate, and indeed, the
whole time he had it, it presented a very bare and desolate appearance. The soil is very
poor, and fit only for the growth of larch and firs; and, of these, upwards of 700 acres
have been planted. Byron could not afford the first outlay which was
necessary, in order ultimately to increase its worth; so that as long as he held it, the
rental did not exceed 1300l. a-year. From the gate to the abbey is a
mile. The carriage road runs straight for about three hundred yards through the
plantations, when it takes a sudden turn to the right; and, on returning to the left, a
beautiful and extensive view over the valley and distant hills is opened with the turrets
of the abbey, rising among the dark trees beneath. To the right of the abbey is perceived a
tower on a hill, in the midst of a grove of firs. From this part the road winds gently to
the left till it reaches the abbey, which is approached on the north side. It lies in a
valley very low; sheltered to the north and west, by rising ground; and to the south,
enjoying a fine prospect over an undulating vale. A more secluded spot could hardly have
been chosen for the pious purposes to which it was devoted. To the north and east is a
garden, walled in; and to the west the upper lake. On the west side, the mansion is without
any enclosure or garden-drive, and can therefore be approached by any person passing
through the park. In this open space is the ancient cistern, or fountain, of the convent,
covered with grotesque carvings, and having water still running into a basin. The old
church-window, which, in an architectural point of view, is most
deserving of observation, is nearly entire, and adjoins the north-west corner of the abbey.
Through the iron gate which opens into the garden, under the arch, is seen the dog’s
tomb; it is on the north side, upon a raised ground, and surrounded by steps. The verses
inscribed on one side of the pedestal are well known, but the lines preceding them are not
so. They run thus:
Near this spot
Are deposited the remains of one
Who possessed Beauty without vanity,
Strength without insolence,
Courage without ferocity,
And all the virtues of Man without his vices.
This praise, which would be unmeaning flattery
If inscribed over human ashes,
Is but a just tribute to the memory of
Boatswain, a dog,
Who was born at Newfoundland, May, 1803,
And died at Newstead, November 18th, 1808.
The whole edifice is a quadrangle, enclosing a court, with a reservoir,
and jet d’eau in the middle; and the
cloisters still entire, running round the four sides. The south, now the principal front,
looks over a pleasure-garden to a small lake, which has been opened from the upper one,
since Byron’s time. The entrance-door is on the
west, in a small vestibule, and has nothing remarkable in it. On entering, I came into a
large stone hall, and turning to the left, went through it to a smaller one, beyond which
is the staircase. The whole of this part has been almost entirely rebuilt by Colonel Wildman; indeed, during
Byron’s occupation, the only habitable rooms were some small
ones in the south-east angle. Over the cloister, on the four sides of the building, runs
the gallery, from which doors open into various apartments, now fitted up with taste and
elegance, for the accommodation of a family, but then empty, and fast going to decay. In
one of the galleries hang two oil-paintings of dogs, as large as
life; one, a red wolf-dog, and the other, a black Newfoundland, with white legs, the
celebrated Boatswain. They both died at Newstead. Of the latter,
Byron felt the loss as of a dear friend. These are almost the only
paintings of Byron’s which remain at the abbey. From the
gallery, I entered the refectory, now the grand drawing-room; an apartment of great
dimensions, facing south, with a fine vaulted roof, and polished oak floor, and splendidly
furnished in the modern style. The walls are covered with full-length portraits of the old
school. As this room has been made fit for use, entirely since the days of
Byron, there are not those associations connected with it which
are to be found in many of the others, though of inferior appearance. Two objects there
are, however, which demand observation. The first that caught my attention was the portrait
of Byron, by Phillips, over the
fireplace, upon which I gazed with strong feelings; it is certainly the handsomest and most
pleasing likeness of him I have seen. The other is a thing about which every body has
heard, and of which few have any just idea. In a cabinet at the end of the room, carefully
preserved, and concealed in a sliding case, is kept the celebrated skull cup, upon which
are inscribed those splendid verses: Start not, nor deem my spirit fled, &c. |
People often suppose, from the name, that the cup retains all the terrific
appearances of a death’s head, and imagine that they could
Behold through each lack-lustre eyeless hole The gay recess of wisdom and of wit. |
Not at all; there is nothing whatever startling in it. It is well polished, its edge
is bound by a broad rim of silver, and it is set in a neat stand of the same metal, which
serves as a handle, and upon the four sides of which, and not upon the skull itself, the
verses are engraved. It is, in short, in appearance, a very
handsome utensil, and one from which the most fastidious person might (in my opinion) drink
without scruple. It was always produced after dinner, when Byron had company at the Abbey, and a bottle of claret poured into it. An
elegant round library-table is the only article of furniture in this room that belonged to
Byron, and this he constantly used. Beyond the refectory, on the
same floor, is Byron’s study, now used as a temporary dining-room, the entire
furniture of which is the same that was used by him. It is all very plain, indeed ordinary.
A good painting of a battle, over the sideboard, was also his. This apartment, perhaps,
beyond all others, deserves the attention of the pilgrim to Newstead, as more intimately
connected with the poetical existence of Byron. It was here that he
prepared for the press those first effusions of his genius which were published at Newark,
under the title of Hours of Idleness. It was
here that he meditated, planned, and for the most part wrote, that splendid retort to the
severe critiques they had called down, which stamped him as the keenest satirist of the
day. And it was here that his tender and beautiful verses to Mary, and many of those sweet pieces found
among his miscellaneous poems, were composed. His bed-room is small, and still remains in
the same state as when he occupied it; it contains little worthy of notice, besides the
bed, which is of common size, with gilt posts, surmounted by coronets. Over the fireplace
is a picture of Murray, the old family servant who
accompanied Byron to Gibraltar, when he first went abroad. A picture
of Henry VIII., and another portrait in this room,
complete the enumeration of all the furniture or paintings of
Byron’s remaining at the Abbey. In some of the rooms are
very curiously-carved mantel-pieces, with grotesque figures, evidently of old date. In a
corner of one of the galleries there still remained the fencing
foils, gloves, masks, and single-sticks he used in his youth, and in a corner of the
cloister lies a stone coffin, taken from the burial ground of the abbey. The ground floor
contains some spacious halls and divers apartments for domestic offices, and there is a
neat little private chapel in the cloister, where service is performed on Sundays.
Byron’s sole recreation here was his boat and dogs, and
boxing and fencing for exercise, and to prevent a tendency to obesity, which he dreaded.
His constant employment was writing, for which he used to sit up as late as two or three
o’clock in the morning. His life here was an entire seclusion, devoted to poetry.
THE END.
C. WHITING, BEAUFORT HOUSE, STRAND
Leigh Hunt,
Lord Byron and Some of his Contemporaries (London: Henry Colburn, 1828)
An article was
written in “The Westminster
Review” (Medwin says
by Mr. Hobhouse) to show that the Conversations were altogether unworthy of
credit. There are doubtless many inaccuracies in the latter; but the spirit remains
undoubted; and the author of the criticism was only vexed, that such was the fact. He
assumes, that Lord Byron could not have made this or that statement to
Captain Medwin, because the statement was erroneous or untrue; but
an anonymous author has no right to be believed in preference to one who speaks in his own
name: there is nothing to show that Mr. Hobhouse might not have been
as mistaken about a date or an epigram as Mr. Medwin; and when we find
him giving us his own version of a fact, and Mr. Medwin asserting that
Lord Byron gave him another, the only impression left upon the
mind of any body who knew his Lordship is, that the fault most probably lay in the loose
corners of the noble Poet’s vivacity. Such is the impression made upon the author of
an unpublished Letter to Mr.
Hobhouse, which has been shown me in print; and he had a right to it. The
reviewer, to my knowledge, is mistaken upon some points, as well as the person he reviews.
The assumption, that nobody can know any thing about Lord Byron but
two or three persons who were conversant with him for a certain space of time, and whom he
spoke of with as little ceremony, and would hardly treat with more confidence than he did a
hundred others, is ludicrous; and can only end, as the criticism has done, in doing no good
either to him or them. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
“Dear Sir;—Amongst the
agreeable things which you say of me in your life of Lord Byron, you conjecture that I
‘condemned’
Childe Harold
previously to its publication. There is not the slightest foundation for this
supposition—nor is it true as you state, ‘that I was the only person
who had seen the poem in manuscript, as I was with Lord
Byron whilst he was writing it.’ I had left
Lord Byron before he had finished the two cantos, and,
excepting a few fragments, I had never seen them until they were printed. My own
persuasion is, that the story told in Dallas’s Recollections of some
person, name unknown, having dissuaded Lord Byron from
publishing Childe Harold, is a
mere fabrication, for it is at complete variance with all Lord
Byron himself told me on the subject. At any rate, I was not that
person; if I had been, it is not very likely that the poem which I had endeavoured
to stifle in its birth, should, in its complete, or, as Lord
Byron says, in its ‘concluded state,’ be dedicated to
me. I must, therefore, request you will take the earliest opportunity of relieving
me from this imputation, which, so far as a man can be written down by any other
author than himself, cannot fail to produce a very prejudicial effect, and to give
me more uneasiness than I think it can be your wish to inflict on any man who has
never given you provocation or excuse for injustice. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
I am glad to find my college
stories administered relief to your nerves, when we were together in the Malta
packet some one and twenty years ago; and I am not sorry that my wearing a red
coat at Cagliari, and cutting my finger in the quarries of Pentelicus, should
have furnished materials for your present volume; but to repay me for having
supplied these timely episodes, as well as for your copious extracts from my
travels in Albania, and also for inserting my note about Madame Guiccioli without my leave, you must
positively cancel the passage respecting Childe Harold
in page 161 of your little volume. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
I wonder that even common policy did not induce you to be
more cautious in making statements which might be so easily disproved, and
which have, indeed, been already incontrovertibly refuted. The very
conversation, which you have judiciously selected from Medwin, as one of those parts of his trumpery book to the truth of which you
can speak, I know to be a lie; for I never went the tour of the lake of Geneva
with Lord Byron. . . .
John Galt,
“Pot versus Kettle” in Fraser’s Magazine
Vol. 2
No. 11 (December 1830)
You tell me that your wish has
been to give only an outline of his intellectual character. I am at a loss to
understand how your gossip about him and me, and the silly anecdotes you have
copied from very discreditable authorities, can be said to be fairly comprised
in such an outline. But your plan ought certainly to have compelled you to make
yourself thoroughly acquainted with his poetry, and to quote him just as he
wrote. Nevertheless, you have misrepresented him at least nine times in the ten
stanzas of that poem which you call the last, and which was not the last, he
ever wrote. Oh, for shame! stick to your acknowledged fictions—there you
are safe—you may deal with Leddy
Grippy and Laurie Todd as
you please, but not with those who have really lived, or who are still
alive. . . .
[John Wilson et. al.],
“Noctes Ambrosianae XVII” in Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine
Vol. 16
No. 94 (November 1824)
And there was another funny thing o’ his, till a queer looking lad, one
Mr. Skeffington, that wrote a tragedy, that was called
“The Mysterious Bride,” the whilk
thing made the Times newspaper for once witty—for it
said no more o’t, than just “Last night a play called The Mysterious
Bride, by the Honorable Mr. Skeffington, was performed at Drury Lane.
The piece was damned.” Weel, ye see it happened that there was a masquerade some nights after,
and Mr. Cam Hobhouse gaed till’t in the disguise
o’ a Spanish nun, that had been ravished by the French army— . . .
Thomas Claughton (1774 c.-1842)
Educated at Rugby, he was a Warrington solicitor and MP for Newton, Lancashire (1818-25)
who agreed to purchase Newstead Abbey in 1812 and then paid the forfeit. He was the father
of Thomas Legh Claughton (1808-1892), bishop of St Albans.
Charles Grey, first earl Grey (1729-1807)
Military officer who distinguished himself in the Seven Years' War and American War of
Independence; he was made a peer in 1801.
J. W. Lake (1829 fl.)
Poet, translator, and author of prefaces to English writers for Parisian publishers; he
wrote
A Poetical Tribute to the Memory of Lord Byron (1824). His
Life of Byron (1826) was translated into German and Italian.
Thomas Phillips (1770-1845)
English painter who assisted Benjamin West, exhibited at the Royal Academy, and painted
portraits of English poets including Byron, Crabbe, Scott, Southey, and Coleridge.
Thomas Wildman (1787-1859)
Schoolfellow of Byron's at Harrow, purchaser and preserver of Newstead Abbey; he served
in the Peninsular War under Sir John Moore and was equerry to the Duke of Sussex.