Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Walter Scott: Autobiographical Fragment, 1808
Ashestiel, April 26th, 1808.
The present age has discovered a desire, or rather a
rage, for literary anecdote and private history, that may be well permitted to
alarm one who has engaged in a certain degree the attention of the public. That
I have had more than my own share of popularity, my contemporaries will be as
ready to admit, as I am to confess that its measure has exceeded not only my
hopes, but my merits, and even wishes. I may be therefore permitted, without an
extraordinary degree of vanity, to take the precaution of recording a few
leading circumstances (they do not merit the name of events) of a very quiet
and uniform life—that, should my literary reputation survive my temporal
existence, the public may know from good authority all that they are entitled
to know of an individual who has contributed to their amusement.
2 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
From the lives of some poets a most important moral lesson may
doubtless be derived, and few sermons can be read with so much profit as the
Memoirs of Burns, of Chatterton, or of Savage. Were I conscious of any thing peculiar in my own moral
character which could render such developement necessary or useful, I would as
readily consent to it as I would bequeath my body to dissection, if the
operation could tend to point out the nature and the means of curing any
peculiar malady. But as my habits of thinking and acting, as well as my rank in
society, were fixed long before I had attained, or even pretended to, any
poetical reputation,* and as it produced, when acquired, no remarkable change
upon either, it is hardly to be expected that much information can be derived
from minutely investigating frailties, follies, or vices, not very different in
number or degree from those of other men in my situation. As I have not been
blessed with the talents of Burns or
Chatterton, I have been happily exempted from the
influence of their violent passions, exasperated by the
* I do not mean to say that my success in literature
has not led me to mix familiarly in society much above my birth and
original pretensions, since I have been readily received in the first
circles in Britain. But there is a certain intuitive knowledge of the
world to which most well-educated Scotchmen are early trained, that
prevents them from being much dazzled by this species of elevation. A
man who to good-nature adds the general rudiments of good breeding,
provided he rest contented with a simple and unaffected manner of
behaving and expressing himself, will never be ridiculous in the best
society, and so far as his talents and information permit, may be an
agreeable part of the company. I have therefore never felt much
elevated, nor did I experience any violent change in situation, by the
passport which my poetical character afforded me into higher company
than my birth warranted.—[1826]. |
struggle of feelings which rose up
against the unjust decrees of fortune. Yet, although I cannot tell of
difficulties vanquished, and distance of rank annihilated by the strength of
genius, those who shall hereafter read this little Memoir may find in it some
hints to be improved, for the regulation of their own minds, or the training
those of others.
Every Scottishman has a pedigree. It is a national prerogative
as unalienable as his pride and his poverty. My birth was neither distinguished
nor sordid. According to the prejudices of my country, it was esteemed gentle,
as I was connected, though remotely, with ancient families both by my
father’s and mother’s side. My father’s grandfather was
Walter Scott, well known in
Teviotdale by the surname of Beardie. He was the second
son of Walter Scott, first Laird of Raeburn, who was third
son of Sir William Scott, and the
grandson of Walter Scott, commonly
called in tradition Auld Watt, of Harden. I am therefore
lineally descended from that ancient chieftain, whose name I have made to ring
in many a ditty, and from his fair dame, the Flower
of Yarrow—no bad genealogy for a Border minstrel. Beardie, my great-grandfather aforesaid,
derived his cognomen from a venerable beard, which he wore unblemished by razor
or scissors, in token of his regret for the banished dynasty of
Stewart. It would have been well that his zeal had
stopped there. But he took arms, and intrigued in their cause, until he lost
all he had in the world, and, as I have heard, run a narrow risk of being
hanged, had it not been for the interference of Anne,
Duchess of Buccleuch and Mon-
4 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
mouth.
Beardie’s elder brother, William Scott of
Raeburn, my great-granduncle, was killed about the age of
twenty-one, in a duel with Pringle of
Crichton, grandfather of the present Mark Pringle of Clifton. They fought with swords, as was the
fashion of the time, in a field near Selkirk, called from the catastrophe the
Raeburn Meadow-spot. Pringle
fled from Scotland to Spain, and was long a captive and slave in Barbary. Beardie became, of course, Tutor of
Raeburn, as the old Scottish phrase called him, that is, guardian to
his infant nephew, father of the present Walter
Scott of Raeburn. He also managed the estates of Makerstoun,
being nearly related to that family by his mother, Barbara
MacDougal. I suppose he had some allowance for his care in
either case, and subsisted upon that and the fortune which he had by his wife,
a Miss Campbell of Silvercraigs, in the west, through
which connexion my father used to call cousin, as they
say, with the Campbells of Blythswood. Beardie was a man
of some learning, and a friend of Dr
Pitcairn, to whom his politics probably made him acceptable.
They had a Tory or Jacobite club in Edinburgh, in which the conversation is
said to have been maintained in Latin. Old Beardie died in
a house, still standing, at the north-east entrance to the Churchyard of Kelso,
about . . . .
He left three sons. The eldest, Walter,
had a family, of which any that now remain have been long settled in America:
the male-heirs are long since extinct. The third was
William, father of James Scott,
well known in India as one of the original settlers of Prince
of Wales’s island: he had, besides, a numerous
family both of sons and daughters, and died at Lasswade, in Mid-Lothian, about
....
The second, Robert
Scott, was my grandfather. He was originally bred to the sea;
but, being shipwrecked near Dundee in his trial voyage, he took such a sincere
dislike to that element, that he could not be persuaded to a second attempt.
This occasioned a quarrel between him and his father, who left him to shift for
himself. Robert was one of those active spirits to whom
this was no misfortune. He turned Whig upon the spot, and fairly abjured his
father’s politics, and his learned poverty. His chief and relative,
Mr Scott of Harden, gave him a lease of the farm of
Sandy-Knowe, comprehending the rocks in the centre of which Smailholm or
Sandy-Knowe Tower is situated. He took for his shepherd an old man, called
Hogg, who willingly lent him, out of respect to his
family, his whole savings, about L.30, to stock the new farm. With this sum,
which it seems was at the time sufficient for the purpose, the master and
servant set off to purchase a stock of sheep at Whitsun-Tryste, a fair held on
a hill near Wooler in Northumberland. The old shepherd went carefully from
drove to drove, till he found a hirsel likely to answer
their purpose, and then returned to tell his master to come up and conclude the
bargain. But what was his surprise to see him galloping a mettled hunter about
the race-course, and to find he had expended the whole stock in this
extraordinary purchase! Moses’s
bargain of green spectacles did not strike more dismay into the Vicar of Wakefield’s family than my
grandfather’s rashness into the poor old shep-
6 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
herd. The
thing, however, was irretrievable, and they returned without the sheep. In the
course of a few days, however, my grandfather, who was one of the best horsemen
of his time, attended John Scott of Harden’s hounds
on this game horse, and displayed him to such advantage that he sold him for
double the original price. The farm was now stocked in earnest; and the rest of
my grandfather’s career was that of successful industry. He was one of
the first who were active in the cattle trade, afterwards carried to such
extent between the Highlands of Scotland and the leading counties in England,
and by his droving transactions acquired a considerable sum of money. He was a
man of middle stature, extremely active, quick, keen, and fiery in his temper,
stubbornly honest, and so distinguished for his skill in country matters, that
he was the general referee in all points of dispute which occurred in the
neighbourhood. His birth being admitted as gentle, gave
him access to the best society in the county, and his dexterity in country
sports, particularly hunting, made him an acceptable companion in the field as
well as at the table.*
Robert Scott of Sandy-Knowe, married, in
1728, Barbara Haliburton, daughter of Thomas Haliburton of Newmains, an ancient and
respectable family in Berwickshire. Among other patrimonial possessions, they
enjoyed the part of Dryburgh, now the property of the Earl of Buchan, comprehending the ruins of the Abbey. My
granduncle, Robert Haliburton, having no
male heirs,
* The present Lord
Haddington, and other gentlemen conversant with the
south country, remember my grandfather well. He was a line alert
figure, and wore a jockey cap over his grey hair. [1826]. |
this estate, as well as the
representation of the family, would have devolved upon my father, and indeed
Old Newmains had settled it upon him; but this was prevented by the misfortunes
of my granduncle, a weak silly man, who engaged in trade, for which he had
neither stock nor talents, and became bankrupt. The ancient patrimony was sold
for a trifle (about L.3000), and my father, who might have purchased it with
ease, was dissuaded by my grandfather, who at that time believed a more
advantageous purchase might have been made of some lands which
Raeburn thought of selling. And thus we have nothing
left of Dryburgh, although my father’s maternal inheritance, but the
right of stretching our bones where mine may perhaps be laid ere any eye but my
own glances over these pages.
Walter Scott, my father, was born in
1729, and educated to the profession of a Writer to the Signet. He was the
eldest of a large family, several of whom I shall have occasion to mention with
a tribute of sincere gratitude. My father was a singular instance of a man
rising to eminence in a profession for which nature had in some degree unfitted
him. He had indeed a turn for labour, and a pleasure in analyzing the abstruse
feudal doctrines connected with conveyancing, which would probably have
rendered him unrivalled in the line of a special pleader, had there been such a
profession in Scotland; but in the actual business of the profession which he
embraced, in that sharp and intuitive perception which is necessary in driving
bargains for himself and others, in availing himself of the wants, necessities,
caprices, and follies of some, and guarding against the knavery and malice of
others, uncle Toby himself could not have
8 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
conducted himself with more simplicity than my father.
Most attorneys have been suspected, more or less justly, of making their own
fortune at the expense of their clients—my father’s fate was to vindicate
his calling from the stain in one instance, for in many cases his clients
contrived to ease him of considerable sums. Many worshipful and be-knighted
names occur to my memory, who did him the honour to run in his debt to the
amount of thousands, and to pay him with a lawsuit, or a commission of
bankruptcy, as the case happened. But they are gone to a different accounting,
and it would be ungenerous to visit their disgrace upon their descendants. My
father was wont also to give openings, to those who were pleased to take them,
to pick a quarrel with him. He had a zeal for his clients which was almost
ludicrous: far from coldly discharging the duties of his employment towards
them, he thought for them, felt for their honour as for his own, and rather
risked disobliging them than neglecting any thing to which he conceived their
duty bound them. If there was an old mother or aunt to be maintained, he was, I
am afraid, too apt to administer to their necessities from what the young heir
had destined exclusively to his pleasures. This ready discharge of obligations
which the Civilians tell us are only natural and not legal, did not, I fear,
recommend him to his employers. Yet his practice was, at one period of his
life, very extensive. He understood his business theoretically, and was early
introduced to it by a partnership with George Chalmers,
Writer to the Signet, under whom he had served his apprenticeship.
His person and face were uncommonly handsome, with an
expression of sweetness of temper, which was not fal-
lacious; his manners were rather formal, but full of
genuine kindness, especially when exercising the duties of hospitality. His
general habits were not only temperate, but severely abstemious; but upon a
festival occasion, there were few whom a moderate glass of wine exhilarated to
such a lively degree. His religion, in which he was devoutly sincere, was
Calvinism of the strictest kind, and his favourite study related to church
history. I suspect the good old man was often engaged with Knox and Spottiswoode’s folios, when, immured in his solitary
room, he was supposed to be immersed in professional researches. In his
political principles he was a steady friend to freedom, with a bias, however,
to the monarchical part of our constitution, which he considered as peculiarly
exposed to danger during the later years of his life. He had much of ancient
Scottish prejudice respecting the forms of marriages, funerals, christenings,
and so forth, and was always vexed at any neglect of etiquette upon such
occasions. As his education had not been upon an enlarged plan, it could not be
expected that he should be an enlightened scholar, but he had not passed
through a busy life without observation; and his remarks upon times and manners
often exhibited strong traits of practical though untaught philosophy. Let me
conclude this sketch, which I am unconscious of having overcharged, with a few
lines written by the late Mrs Cockburn*
upon the subject. They * Mrs Cockburn
(born Miss Rutherford of Fairnalie) was the
authoress of the beautiful song “I have seen the smiling Of fortune beguiling.” [1826]. |
|
10 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
made one among a set of poetical characters which were
given as toasts among a few friends, and we must hold them to contain a
striking likeness, since the original was recognised so soon as they were read
aloud.
“To a thing that’s uncommon
A youth of discretion,
Who, though vastly handsome,
Despises flirtation:
To the friend in affliction,
The heart of affection,
Who may hear the last trump
Without dread of detection.”
|
In [April, 1758] my father married Anne Rutherford, eldest daughter of Dr John Rutherford, professor of medicine in the University of
Edinburgh. He was one of those pupils of Boerhaave to whom the school of medicine in our northern
metropolis owes its rise, and a man distinguished for professional talent, for
lively wit, and for literary acquirements. Dr Rutherford
was twice married. His first wife, of whom my mother is the sole surviving
child, was a daughter of Sir John
Swinton of Swinton, a family which produced many distinguished
warriors during the middle ages, and which, for antiquity and honourable
alliances, may rank with any in Britain. My grandfather’s second wife was
Miss Mackay, by whom he had a second family, of whom
are now (1808) alive, Dr Daniel
Rutherford, professor of botany in the University of Edinburgh,
and Misses Janet and Christian Rutherford, amiable and accomplished
women.
My father and mother had a very numerous family, no fewer, I
believe, than twelve children, of whom many
were highly promising, though only five survived very
early youth. My eldest brother (that is, the eldest whom I remember to have
seen) was Robert Scott, so called after
my uncle, of whom I shall have much to say hereafter. He was bred in the
King’s service, under Admiral, then Captain
William Dickson, and was in most of Rodney’s battles. His temper was bold and haughty, and to
me was often checkered with what I felt to be capricious tyranny. In other
respects I loved him much, for he had a strong turn for literature, read poetry
with taste and judgment, and composed verses himself which had gained him great
applause among his messmates. Witness the following elegy upon the supposed
loss of the vessel, composed the night before
Rodney’s celebrated battle of April the 12th,
1782. It alludes to the various amusements of his mess.— “No more the geese shall cackle on the poop, No more the bagpipe through the orlop sound, No more the midshipmen, a jovial group, Shall toast the girls, and push the bottle round. In death’s dark road at anchor fast they stay, Till Heaven’s loud signal shall in thunder
roar, Then starting up, all hands shall quick obey, Sheet home the topsail, and with speed
unmoor.” |
Robert sung agreeably (a virtue which was never seen in
me) understood the mechanical arts, and when in good humour, could regale us
with many a tale of bold adventure and narrow escapes. When in bad humour,
however, he gave us a practical taste of what was then man-of-war’s
discipline, and kicked and cuffed without mercy. I have often thought how he
might have distinguished himself had he continued in 12 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
the
navy until the present times, so glorious for nautical exploit. But the peace
of Paris cut off all hopes of promotion for those who had not great interest;
and some disgust which his proud spirit had taken at harsh usage from a
superior officer combined to throw poor Robert into the
East India Company’s service, for which his habits were ill adapted. He
made two voyages to the East, and died a victim to the climate in . . .
John Scott, my second brother, is about
three years older than me. He addicted himself to the military service, and is
now brevet-major in the 73d regiment.*
I had an only sister, Anne
Scott, who seemed to be from her cradle the butt for mischance
to shoot arrows at. Her childhood was marked by perilous escapes from the most
extraordinary accidents. Among others, I remember an iron-railed door leading
into the area in the centre of George’s Square being closed by the wind,
while her fingers were betwixt the hasp and staple. Her hand was thus locked
in, and must have been smashed to pieces, had not the bones of her fingers been
remarkably slight and thin. As it was, the hand was cruelly mangled. On another
occasion she was nearly drowned in a pond, or old quarry-hole, in what was then
called Brown’s Park, on the south side of the square. But the most
unfortunate accident, and which, though it happened while she was only six
* He was this year made major of the second battalion,
by the kind intercession of Mr
Canning at the War-Office 1809 He retired from the army,
and kept house with my mother. His health was totally broken, and he
died, yet a young man, on 8th May, 1816.—[1826]. |
years old, proved the remote cause of
her death, was her cap accidentally taking fire. The child was alone in the
room, and before assistance could be obtained, her head was dreadfully
scorched. After a lingering and dangerous illness, she recovered—but never to
enjoy perfect health. The slightest cold occasioned swellings in her face, and
other indications of a delicate constitution. At length, in [1801], poor Anne
was taken ill, and died after a very short interval. Her temper, like that of
her brothers, was peculiar, and in her, perhaps, it showed more odd, from the
habits of indulgence which her nervous illnesses had formed. But she was at
heart an affectionate and kind girl, neither void of talent nor of feeling,
though living in an ideal world which she had framed to herself by the force of
imagination. Anne was my junior by about a year.
A year lower in the list was my brother Thomas Scott, who is still alive.*
Last, and most unfortunate of our family, was my youngest
brother Daniel. With the same aversion
to labour, or rather, I should say, the same determined indolence that marked
us all, he had neither the vivacity of intellect which supplies the want of
diligence,
* Poor Tom, a
man of infinite humour and excellent parts, pursued for some time my
father’s profession; but he was unfortunate, from engaging in
speculations respecting farms and matters out of the line of his proper
business. He afterwards became paymaster of the 70th regiment, and died
in Canada. Tom married Elizabeth, a daughter of the family of
M’Culloch of Ardwell, an ancient
Galwegian stock, by whom he left a son, Walter
Scott, now second lieutenant of engineers in the East
India Company’s service, Bombay, and three daughters—Jessie, married to Lieutenant-Colonel Huxley; 2,
Anne; 3, Eliza—the two last still
unmarried.—[1826]. |
14 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
nor the pride which renders the most detested labour better
than dependence or contempt. His career was as unfortunate as might be augured
from such an unhappy combination, and after various unsuccessful attempts to
establish himself in life, he died on his return from the West Indies, in [July
1806],
Having premised so much of my family, I return to my own
story. I was born, as I believe, on the 15th August, 1771, in a house belonging
to my father, at the head of the College Wynd. It was pulled down, with others,
to make room for the northern front of the new College. I was an uncommonly
healthy child, but had nearly died in consequence of my first nurse being ill
of a consumption, a circumstance which she chose to conceal, though to do so
was murder to both herself and me. She went privately to consult Dr Black, the celebrated professor of
chemistry, who put my father on his guard. The woman was dismissed, and I was
consigned to a healthy peasant, who is still alive to boast of her laddie being what she calls a grand
gentleman.* I showed every sign of health and strength until I was
about eighteen months old. One night, I have been often told, I showed great
reluctance to be caught and put to bed, and after being chased about the room,
was apprehended and consigned to my dormitory with some difficulty. It was the
last time I was to show such personal agility. In the morning I was discovered
to be affected with the fever which often accompanies the cutting of large
teeth. It held me three days. On the
* She died in 1810.—[1826]. |
fourth, when they went to bathe me as
usual, they discovered that I had lost the power of my right leg. My
grandfather, an excellent anatomist as well as physician, the late worthy
Alexander Wood, and many others of
the most respectable of the faculty, were consulted. There appeared to be no
dislocation or sprain; blisters and other topical remedies were applied in
vain. When the efforts of regular physicians had been exhausted, without the
slightest success, my anxious parents, during the course of many years, eagerly
grasped at every prospect of cure which was held out by the promise of
empirics, or of ancient ladies or gentlemen who conceived themselves entitled
to recommend various remedies, some of which were of a nature sufficiently
singular. But the advice of my grandfather, Dr
Rutherford, that I should be sent to reside in the country, to
give the chance of natural exertion, excited by free air and liberty, was first
resorted to, and before I have the recollection of the slightest event, I was,
agreeably to this friendly counsel, an inmate in the farm-house of Sandy-Knowe.
An odd incident is worth recording. It seems my mother had
sent a maid to take charge of me, that I might be no inconvenience in the
family. But the damsel sent on that important mission had left her heart behind
her, in the keeping of some wild fellow, it is likely, who had done and said
more to her than he was like to make good. She became extremely desirous to
return to Edinburgh, and as my mother made a point of her remaining where she
was, she contracted a sort of hatred at poor me, as the cause of her being
16 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
detained at Sandy-Knowe. This rose, I suppose, to a sort of
delirious affection, for she confessed to old Alison
Wilson, the housekeeper, that she had carried me up to the
Craigs, meaning, under a strong temptation of the Devil, to cut my throat with
her scissors, and bury me in the moss. Alison instantly
took possession of my person, and took care that her confidant should not be
subject to any farther temptation, so far as I was concerned. She was
dismissed, of course, and I have heard became afterwards a lunatic.
It is here at Sandy-Knowe, in the residence of my paternal
grandfather, already mentioned, that
I have the first consciousness of existence; and I recollect distinctly that my
situation and appearance were a little whimsical. Among the odd remedies
recurred to to aid my lameness, some one had recommended that so often as a
sheep was killed for the use of the family, I should be stripped, and swathed
up in the skin warm as it was flayed from the carcass of the animal. In this
Tartar-like habiliment I well remember lying upon the floor of the little
parlour in the farm-house, while my grandfather, a venerable old man with white
hair, used every excitement to make me try to crawl. I also distinctly remember
the late Sir George MacDougal of
Makerstoun, father of the present Sir Henry Hay
MacDougal, joining in this kindly attempt. He was, God knows
how,* a relation of ours, and I still recollect him in his
* He was a second cousin of my grandfather’s.
Isobel MacDougal, wife of Walter, the first Laird of Raeburn,
and mother of Walter Scott,
called Beardie, was grand aunt, I take it, to the
late Sir George MacDougal. There
was always great friendship between |
old fashioned military habit (he had
been colonel of the Greys), with a small cocked hat, deeply laced, an
embroidered scarlet waistcoat, and a light-coloured coat, with milk-white locks
tied in a military fashion, kneeling on the ground before me, and dragging his
watch along the carpet to induce me to follow it. The benevolent old soldier
and the infant wrapped in his sheepskin would have afforded an odd group to
uninterested spectators. This must have happened about my third year, for
Sir George MacDougal and my grandfather both died
shortly after that period.
My grandmother continued for some years to take charge of the
farm, assisted by my father’s second brother, Mr Thomas Scott, who resided at Crailing, as
factor or land-steward for Mr Scott of
Danesfield, then proprietor of that estate.* This was during the
heat of the American war, and I remember being as anxious on my uncle’s
weekly visits (for we heard news at no other time) to hear of the defeat of
Washington, as if I had had some
deep and personal cause of antipathy to him. I know not how this was combined
with a very strong prejudice in favour of the Stuart
family, which
us and the Makerston family. It
singularly happened that at the burial of the late Sir Henry MacDougal, my cousin
William Scott younger of Raeburn, and I myself were the nearest
blood-relations present, although our connexion was of so old a date,
and ranked as pall-bearers accordingly. [1826]. * My uncle afterwards resided at Elliston, and then
took from Mr Cornelius Elliot
the estate of Woollee. Finally, he retired to Monklaw, in the
neighbourhood of Jedburgh, where he died, 1823, at the advanced age of
ninety years, and in full possession of his faculties. It was a fine
thing to hear him talk over the change of the country which he had
witnessed.—[1826]. |
18 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
I had originally imbibed from the songs and tales of the
Jacobites. This latter political propensity was deeply confirmed by the stories
told in my hearing of the cruelties exercised in the executions at Carlisle,
and in the Highlands, after the battle of Culloden. One or two of our own
distant relations had fallen on that occasion, and I remember detesting the
name of Cumberland with more than infant
hatred. Mr Curle, farmer at Yetbyre, husband of one of my
aunts, had been present at their execution; and it was probably from him that I
first heard these tragic tales which made so great an impression on me. The
local information, which I conceive had some share in forming my future taste
and pursuits, I derived from the old songs and tales which then formed the
amusement of a retired country family. My grandmother, in whose youth the old
Border depredations were matter of recent tradition, used to tell me many a
tale of Watt of Harden, Wight Willie of Aikwood, Jamie Tellfer of the fair Dodhead, and other heroes—merrymen
all of the persuasion and calling of Robin
Hood and Little John. A more
recent hero, but not of less note, was the celebrated Diel of Littledean, whom she well
remembered, as he had married her mother’s sister. Of this extraordinary
person I learned many a story, grave and gay, comic and warlike. Two or three
old books which lay in the window-seat were explored for my amusement in the
tedious winter days. Automathes and Ramsay’s Tea-table Miscellany were my favourites,
although at a later period an odd volume of Josephus’s Wars of the Jews divided my partiality.
My kind and affectionate aunt, Miss Janet Scott, whose
memory will ever be dear to me, used to read these works to me with admirable
patience, until I could repeat long passages by heart. The ballad of Hardyknute I was early
master of, to the great annoyance of almost our only visitor, the worthy
clergyman of the parish, Dr Duncan, who
had not patience to have a sober chat interrupted by my shouting forth this
ditty. Methinks I now see his tall thin emaciated figure, his legs cased in
clasped gambadoes, and his face of a length that would have rivalled the
Knight of La Mancha’s, and hear
him exclaiming, “One may as well speak in the mouth of a cannon as
where that child is.” With this little acidity, which was natural
to him, he was a most excellent and benevolent man, a gentleman in every
feeling, and altogether different from those of his order who cringe at the
tables of the gentry, or domineer and riot at those of the yeomanry. In his
youth he had been chaplain in the family of Lord
Marchmont—had seen Pope—and could talk familiarly of many characters who had survived
the Augustan age of Queen Anne. Though
valetudinary, he lived to be nearly ninety, and to welcome to Scotland his son,
Colonel William Duncan, who, with the highest
character for military and civil merit, had made a considerable fortune in
India. In [1795], a few days before his death, I paid him a visit, to enquire
after his health. I found him emaciated to the last degree, wrapped in a tartan
night-gown, and employed with all the activity of health and youth in
correcting a history of the Revolution, which he intended should be given to
the public when he was no more. He read me several passages with a voice
naturally strong, and 20 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
which the feelings of an author then
raised above the depression of age and declining health. I begged him to spare
this fatigue, which could not but injure his health. His answer was remarkable,
“I know,” he said, “that I cannot survive a
fortnight—and what signifies an exertion that can at worst only accelerate
my death a few days?” I marvelled at the composure of this reply,
for his appearance sufficiently vouched the truth of his prophecy, and rode
home to my uncle’s (then my abode), musing what there could be in the
spirit of authorship that could inspire its votaries with the courage of
martyrs. He died within less than the period he assigned—with which event I
close my digression.
I was in my fourth year when my father was advised that the
Bath waters might be of some advantage to my lameness. My affectionate
aunt, although such a journey
promised to a person of her retired habits any thing but pleasure or amusement,
undertook as readily to accompany me to the wells of Bladud, as if she had expected all the delight that ever the
prospect of a watering-place held out to its most impatient visitants. My
health was by this time a good deal confirmed by the country air, and the
influence of that imperceptible and unfatiguing exercise to which the good
sense of my grandfather had subjected me; for when the day was fine, I was
usually carried out and laid down beside the old shepherd, among the crags or
rocks round which he fed his sheep. The impatience of a child soon inclined me
to struggle with my infirmity, and I began by degrees to stand, to walk, and to
run. Although the limb
affected was much
shrunk and contracted, my general health, which was of more importance, was
much strengthened by being frequently in the open air, and, in a word, I who in
a city had probably been condemned to hopeless and helpless decrepitude, was
now a healthy, high-spirited, and, my lameness apart, a sturdy
child—non sine diis animosus
infans.
We went to London by sea, and it may gratify the curiosity of
minute biographers to learn, that our voyage was performed in the Duchess of Buccleuch, Captain
Beatson, master. At London we made a short stay, and saw some of
the common shows exhibited to strangers. When, twenty-five years afterwards, I
visited the Tower of London and Westminster Abbey, I was astonished to find how
accurate my recollections of these celebrated places of visitation proved to
be, and I have ever since trusted more implicitly to my juvenile reminiscences.
At Bath, where I lived about a year, I went through all the usual discipline of
the pump-room and baths, but I believe without the least advantage to my
lameness. During my residence at Bath, I acquired the rudiments of reading at a
day-school, kept by an old dame near our lodgings, and I had never a more
regular teacher, although I think I did not attend her a quarter of a year. An
occasional lesson from my aunt supplied the rest. Afterwards, when grown a big
boy, I had a few lessons from Mr Stalker of Edinburgh, and
finally from the Rev. Mr Clure. But I never acquired a
just pronunciation, nor could I read with much propriety.
In other respects my residence at Bath is marked by
22 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
very pleasing recollections. The venerable John Home, author of Douglas, was then at the watering-place,
and paid much attention to my aunt and to me. His wife, who has survived him,
was then an invalid, and used to take the air in her carriage on the Downs,
when I was often invited to accompany her. But the most delightful
recollections of Bath are dated after the arrival of my uncle, Captain Robert Scott, who introduced me to all
the little amusements which suited my age, and, above all, to the theatre. The
play was As You Like
It; and the witchery of the whole scene is alive in my mind at this
moment. I made, I believe, noise more than enough, and remember being so much
scandalized at the quarrel between Orlando
and his brother in the first scene, that I screamed out, “A’
n’t they brothers?” A few weeks’ residence at home
convinced me, who had till then been an only child in the house of my
grandfather, that a quarrel between brothers was a very natural event.
The other circumstances I recollect of my residence in Bath
are but trifling, yet I never recall them without a feeling of pleasure. The
beauties of the parade (which of them I know not), with the river Avon winding
around it, and the lowing of the cattle from the opposite hills, are warm in my
recollection, and are only rivalled by the splendours of a toy-shop somewhere
near the Orange Grove. I had acquired, I know not by what means, a kind of
superstitious terror for statuary of all kinds. No ancient Iconoclast or modern
Calvinist could have looked on the outside of the abbey church (if I mistake
not, the principal church at Bath is so
called) with more horror than the image of Jacob’s Ladder, with all its
angels, presented to my infant eye. My uncle effectually combated my terrors, and formally introduced
me to a statue of Neptune, which perhaps
still keeps guard at the side of the Avon, where a pleasure boat crosses to
Spring Gardens.
After being a year at Bath, I returned first to Edinburgh,
and afterwards for a season to Sandy-Knowe; and thus the time whiled away till
about my eighth year, when it was thought sea-bathing might be of service to my
lameness.
For this purpose, still under my aunt’s protection, I
remained some weeks at Prestonpans, a circumstance not worth mentioning,
excepting to record my juvenile intimacy with an old military veteran,
Dalgetty by name, who had pitched his tent in that
little village, after all his campaigns subsisting upon an ensign’s
half-pay, though called by courtesy a Captain. As this old gentleman, who had
been in all the German wars, found very few to listen to his tales of military
feats, he formed a sort of alliance with me, and I used invariably to attend
him for the pleasure of hearing those communications. Sometimes our
conversation turned on the American war, which was then raging. It was about
the time of Burgoyne’s unfortunate
expedition, to which my Captain and I augured different conclusions. Somebody
had showed me a map of North America, and, struck with the rugged appearance of
the country, and the quantity of lakes, I expressed some doubts on the subject
of the General’s arriving safely at the end of his journey, which were
very indignantly refuted by the Captain. The
24 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
news of the
Saratoga disaster, while it gave me a little triumph, rather shook my intimacy
with the veteran.*
* Besides this veteran, I found another ally at
Prestonpans, in the person of George
Constable, an old friend of my father’s, educated to
the law, but retired upon his independent property, and generally residing
near Dundee. He had many of those peculiarities of temper which long
afterwards I tried to develope in the character of Jonathan Oldbuck. It is very odd, that though I am
unconscious of any thing in which I strictly copied the manners of my old friend, the resemblance was nevertheless
detected by George Chalmers, Esq.,
solicitor, London, an old friend, both of my father and Mr
Constable, and who affirmed to my late friend, Lord Kinedder, that I must needs be the
author of the Antiquary, since he recognised the portrait of
George Constable. But my friend
George was not so decided an enemy to womankind as
his representative Monkbarns. On the
contrary, I rather suspect that he had a tendresse for my Aunt
Jenny, who even then was a most beautiful woman, though
somewhat advanced in life. To the close of her life, she had the finest
eyes and teeth I ever saw, and though she could be sufficiently sharp when
she had a mind, her general behaviour was genteel and ladylike. However
this might be, I derived a great deal of curious information from
George Constable, both at this early period, and
afterwards. He was constantly philandering about my aunt, and of course
very kind to me. He was the first person who told me about Falstaff and Hotspur, and other characters in Shakspeare. What idea I annexed to them I
know not, but I must have annexed some, for I remember quite well being
interested on the subject. Indeed, I rather suspect that children derive
impulses of a powerful and important kind in hearing things which they
cannot entirely comprehend; and therefore, that to write down to children’s understanding is a mistake; set them on
the scent, and let them puzzle it out. To return to George
Constable, I knew him well at a much later period. He used
always to dine at my father’s house of a Sunday, and was authorized
to turn the conversation out of the austere and Calvinistic tone, which it
usually maintained on that day, upon subjects of history or auld langsyne.
He remembered the forty-five, and told many excellent stories, all with a
strong dash of a peculiar caustic humour.
George’s sworn ally as a
brother antiquary was John Davidson,
then Keeper of the Signet; and I remember his flattering and com-
|
From Prestonpans I was transported back to my father’s
house in George’s Square, which continued to be my most established place
of residence, until my marriage in 1797. I felt the change from being a single
indulged brat, to becoming a member of a large family, very severely; for under
the gentle government of my kind grandmother, who was meekness itself, and of
my aunt, who, though of an higher temper, was exceedingly attached to me, I had
acquired a degree of license which could not be permitted in a large family. I
had sense enough, however, to bend my temper to my new circumstances; but such
was the agony which I internally experienced, that I have guarded against
nothing more in the education of my own family, than against their acquiring
habits of self-willed caprice and domination. I found much consolation during
this period of mortification in the partiality of my mother. She join-
pelling me to go to dine there. A
writer’s apprentice with the Keeper cf the Signet, whose least
officer kept us in order! It was an awful event. Thither, however, I
went with some secret expectation of a scantling of good claret.
Mr D. had a son whose taste
inclined him to the army, to which his father, who had designed him for
the bar, gave a most unwilling consent. He was at this time a young
officer, and he and I, leaving the two seniors to proceed in their chat
as they pleased, never once opened our mouths either to them or each
other. The Pragmatic Sanction happened unfortunately to become the
theme of their conversation, when Constable said in jest, “Now, John, I’ll
wad you a plack that neither of these two lads ever heard of the
Pragmatic Sanction.”—“Not heard of the Pragmatic
Sanction! “said John Davidson; “I
would like to see that;” and with a voice of thunder, he
asked his son the fatal question. As young D.
modestly allowed he knew nothing about it, his father drove him from
the table in a rage, and I absconded during the confusion; nor could
Constable ever bring me back again to his
friend Davidson’s. [1826]. |
26 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
ed to a light and happy temper of mind a strong turn to
study poetry and works of imagination. She was sincerely devout, but her
religion was, as became her sex, of a cast less austere than my father’s.
Still, the discipline of the Presbyterian Sabbath was severely strict, and I
think injudiciously so. Although Bunyan’s Pilgrim, Gesner’s Death of Abel, Rowe’s Letters, and one or two other books, which, for that reason, I
still have a favour for, were admitted to relieve the gloom of one dull sermon
succeeding to another—there was far too much tedium annexed to the duties of
the day; and in the end it did none of us any good.
My week-day tasks were more agreeable. My lameness and my
solitary habits had made me a tolerable reader, and my hours of leisure were
usually spent in reading aloud to my mother Pope’s translation of Homer, which, excepting a few traditionary ballads,
and the songs in Allan
Ramsay’s Evergreen, was the first poetry which I
perused. My mother had good natural
taste and great feeling: she used to make me pause upon those passages which
expressed generous and worthy sentiments, and if she could not divert me from
those which were descriptive of battle and tumult, she contrived at least to
divide my attention between them. My own enthusiasm, however, was chiefly
awakened by the wonderful and the terrible—the common taste of children, but in
which I have remained a child even unto this day. I got by heart, not as a
task, but almost without intending it, the passages with which I was most
pleased, and used to recite them aloud, both when alone and to others—more
willingly, however, in my
hours of
solitude, for I had observed some auditors smile, and I dreaded ridicule at
that time of life more than I have ever done since.
In [1779] I was sent to the second class of the Grammar
School, or High School of Edinburgh, then taught by Mr Luke Fraser, a good Latin scholar and a very worthy man.
Though I had received, with my brothers, in private, lessons of Latin from
Mr James French, now a minister of
the Kirk of Scotland, I was nevertheless rather behind the class in which I was
placed both in years and in progress. This was a real disadvantage, and one to
which a boy of lively temper and talents ought to be as little exposed as one
who might be less expected to make up his lee-way, as it is called. The
situation has the unfortunate effect of reconciling a boy of the former
character (which in a posthumous work I may claim for my own) to holding a
subordinate station among his class-fellows—to which he would otherwise affix
disgrace. There is also, from the constitution of the High School, a certain
danger not sufficiently attended to. The boys take precedence in their places,
as they are called, according to their merit, and it requires a long while, in
general, before even a clever boy, if he falls behind the class, or is put into
one for which he is not quite ready, can force his way to the situation which
his abilities really entitle him to hold. But, in the mean while, he is
necessarily led to be the associate and companion of those inferior spirits
with whom he is placed; for the system of precedence, though it does not limit
the general intercourse among the boys, has nevertheless the effect of
28 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
throwing them into clubs and coteries, according to the
vicinity of the seats they hold. A boy of good talents, therefore, placed, even
for a time, among his inferiors, especially if they be also his elders, learns
to participate in their pursuits and objects of ambition, which are usually
very distinct from the acquisition of learning; and it will be well if he does
not also imitate them in that indifference which is contented with bustling
over a lesson, so as to avoid punishment, without affecting superiority, or
aiming at reward. It was probably owing to this circumstance that, although at
a more advanced period of life I have enjoyed considerable facility in
acquiring languages, I did not make any great figure at the High School or, at
least, any exertions which I made were desultory and little to be depended on.
Our class contained some very excellent scholars. The first
Dux was James Buchan, who retained his honoured place,
almost without a day’s interval, all the while we were at the High
School. He was afterwards at the head of the medical staff in Egypt, and in
exposing himself to the plague infection, by attending the hospitals there,
displayed the same well-regulated and gentle, yet determined perseverance,
which placed him most worthily at the head of his school-fellows, while many
lads of livelier parts and dispositions held an inferior station. The next best
scholars (sed longo intervallo) were
my friend David Douglas, the heir and
élève of the celebrated Adam
Smith, and James Hope, now
a Writer to the Signet, both since well known and distinguished in their
departments of the law. As for myself, I
glanced like a meteor from one end of the class to the other, and commonly
disgusted my kind master as much by negligence and frivolity, as I occasionally
pleased him by flashes of intellect and talent. Among my companions, my
good-nature and a flow of ready imagination rendered me very popular. Boys are
uncommonly just in their feelings, and at least equally generous. My lameness,
and the efforts which I made to supply that disadvantage, by making up in
address what I wanted in activity, engaged the latter principle in my favour;
and in the winter play hours, when hard exercise was impossible, my tales used
to assemble an admiring audience round Luckie
Brown’s fireside, and happy was he that could sit next to
the inexhaustible narrator. I was also, though often negligent of my own task,
always ready to assist my friends, and hence I had a little party of staunch
partisans and adherents, stout of Land and heart, though somewhat dull of head,
the very tools for raising a hero to eminence. So, on the whole, I made a
brighter figure in the yards than in the class.*
My father did not trust our education solely to our High
School lessons. We had a tutor at home, a young
* I read not long since, in that authentic record
called the Percy
Anecdotes, that I had been educated at Musselburgh school,
where I had been distinguished as an absolute dunce, only Dr Blair, seeing farther into the
millstone, had pronounced there was fire in it. I never was at
Musselburgh school in my life, and though I have met Dr
Blair at my father’s and elsewhere, I never had
the good fortune to attract his notice, to my knowledge. Lastly, I was
never a dunce, nor thought to be so, but an incorrigibly idle imp, who
was always longing to do something else than what was enjoined
him.—[1826]. |
30 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
man of an excellent disposition, and a laborious student.
He was bred to the Kirk, but unfortunately took such a very strong turn to
fanaticism, that he afterwards resigned an excellent living in a seaport town,
merely because he could not persuade the mariners of the guilt of setting sail
of a Sabbath,—in which, by the by, he was less likely to be successful, as,
cæteris paribus,
sailors, from an opinion that it is a fortunate omen, always choose to weigh
anchor on that day. The calibre of this young man’s understanding may be
judged of by this anecdote; but in other respects, he was a faithful and active
instructor; and from him chiefly I learned writing and arithmetic. I repeated
to him my French lessons, and studied with him my themes in the classics, but
not classically. I also acquired, by disputing with him, for this he readily
permitted, some knowledge of school-divinity and church-history, and a great
acquaintance in particular with the old books describing the early history of
the Church of Scotland, the wars and sufferings of the Covenanters, and so
forth. I, with a head on fire for chivalry, was a Cavalier; my friend was a
Roundhead; I was a Tory, and he was a Whig. I hated Presbyterians, and admired
Montrose with his victorious
Highlanders; he liked the Presbyterian Ulysses, the dark and politic Argyle; so that we never wanted subjects of dispute, but our
disputes were always amicable. In all these tenets there was no real conviction
on my part, arising out of acquaintance with the views or principles of either
party; nor had my antagonist address enough to turn the debate on such topics.
I took up my politics at that period as King
Charles II. did his religion, from an idea
that the Cavalier creed was the more gentlemanlike persuasion of the two.
After having been three years under Mr Fraser, our class was, in the usual routine
of the school, turned over to Dr Adam,
the Rector. It was from this respectable man that I first learned the value of
the knowledge I had hitherto considered only as a burdensome task. It was the
fashion to remain two years at his class, where we read Cæsar, and Livy, and
Sallust, in prose; Virgil, Horace,
and Terence, in verse. I had by this time
mastered, in some degree, the difficulties of the language, and began to be
sensible of its beauties. This was really gathering grapes from thistles; nor
shall I soon forget the swelling of my little pride when the Rector pronounced,
that though many of my school-fellows understood the Latin better,
Gualterus Scott was behind
few in following and enjoying the author’s meaning. Thus encouraged, I
distinguished myself by some attempts at poetical versions from
Horace and Virgil. Dr
Adam used to invite his scholars to such essays, but never made
them tasks. I gained some distinction upon these occasions, and the Rector in
future took much notice of me, and his judicious mixture of censure and praise
went far to counterbalance my habits of indolence and inattention. I saw I was
expected to do well, and I was piqued in honour to vindicate my master’s
favourable opinion. I climbed, therefore, to the first form; and, though I
never made a first-rate Latinist, my schoolfellows, and what was of more
consequence, I myself, considered that I had a character for
32 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
learning to maintain. Dr Adam, to whom I owed so much,
never failed to remind me of my obligations when I had made some figure in the
literary world. He was, indeed, deeply imbued with that fortunate vanity which
alone could induce a man who has arms to pare and burn a muir to submit to the
yet more toilsome task of cultivating youth. As Catholics confide in the
imputed righteousness of their saints, so did the good old doctor plume himself
upon the success of his scholars in life, all of which he never failed (and
often justly) to claim as the creation, or at least the fruits, of his early
instructions. He remembered the fate of every boy at his school during the
fifty years he had superintended it, and always traced their success or
misfortunes entirely to their attention or negligence when under his care. His
“noisy mansion” which to others would have been a
melancholy bedlam, was the pride of his heart; and the only fatigues he felt,
amidst din and tumult, and the necessity of reading themes, hearing lessons,
and maintaining some degree of order at the same time, were relieved by
comparing himself to Cæsar, who could dictate to
three secretaries at once;—so ready is vanity to lighten the labours of duty.
It is a pity that a man so learned, so admirably adapted for
his station, so useful, so simple, so easily contented, should have had other
subjects of mortification. But the magistrates of Edinburgh, not knowing the
treasure they possessed in Dr Adam,
encouraged a savage fellow, called Nicol, one of the undermasters, in insulting his person and
authority. This
man was an excellent
classical scholar, and an admirable convivial humourist (which latter quality
recommended him to the friendship of Burns); but worthless, drunken, and inhumanly cruel to the boys
under his charge. He carried his feud against the Rector within an inch of
assassination, for he waylaid and knocked him down in the dark. The favour
which this worthless rival obtained in the town-council led to other
consequences, which for some time clouded poor
Adam’s happiness and fair fame. When the French
Revolution broke out, and parties ran high in approving or condemning it, the
doctor incautiously joined the former. This was very natural, for as all his
ideas of existing governments were derived from his experience of the
town-council of Edinburgh, it must be admitted they scarce brooked comparison
with the free states of Rome and Greece, from which he borrowed his opinions
concerning republics. His want of caution in speaking on the political topics
of the day lost him the respect of the boys, most of whom were accustomed to
hear very different opinions on those matters in the bosom of their families.
This, however (which was long after my time), passed away with other heats of
the period, and the doctor continued his labours till about a year since, when
he was struck with palsy while teaching his class. He survived a few days, but
becoming delirious before his dissolution, conceived he was still in school,
and after some expressions of applause or censure, he said, “But it
grows dark—the boys may dismiss”—and instantly expired.
From Dr Adam’s
class I should, according to the
34 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
usual routine, have
proceeded immediately to college. But, fortunately, I was not yet to lose, by a
total dismission from constraint, the acquaintance with the Latin which I had
acquired. My health had become rather delicate from rapid growth, and my father
was easily persuaded to allow me to spend half-a-year at Kelso with my kind
aunt, Miss Janet Scott, whose inmate I
again became. It was hardly worth mentioning that I had frequently visited her
during our short vacations.
At this time she resided in a small house, situated very
pleasantly in a large garden, to the eastward of the churchyard of Kelso, which
extended down to the Tweed. It was then my father’s property, from whom
it was afterwards purchased by my uncle. My grandmother was now dead, and my
aunt’s only companion, besides an old maid-servant, was my cousin,
Miss Barbara Scott, now Mrs
Meik. My time was here left entirely to my own disposal,
excepting for about four hours in the day, when I was expected to attend the
grammar-school of the village. The teacher at that time was Mr Lancelot Whale, an excellent classical
scholar, a humourist, and a worthy man. He had a supreme antipathy to the puns
which his very uncommon name frequently gave rise to; insomuch, that he made
his son spell the word Wale, which only occasioned the
young man being nicknamed the Prince of Wales by the
military mess to which he belonged. As for Whale, senior,
the least allusion to Jonah, or the terming him an odd
fish, or any similar quibble, was sure to put him beside himself. In point of
knowledge and
taste, he was far too good
for the situation he held, which only required that he should give his scholars
a rough foundation in the Latin language. My time with him, though short, was
spent greatly to my advantage and his gratification. He was glad to escape to
Persius and Tacitus from the eternal Rudiments and Cornelius Nepos; and as perusing these authors with one who
began to understand them was to him a labour of love, I made considerable
progress under his instructions. I suspect, indeed, that some of the time
dedicated to me was withdrawn from the instruction of his more regular
scholars; but I was as grateful as I could. I acted as usher, and heard the
inferior classes, and I spouted the speech of Galgacus at
the public examination, which did not make the less impression on the audience
that few of them probably understood one word of it.
In the mean while my acquaintance with English literature was
gradually extending itself. In the intervals of my school hours I had always
perused with avidity such books of history or poetry or voyages and travels as
chance presented to me—not forgetting the usual, or rather ten times the usual,
quantity of fairy tales, eastern stories, romances, &c. These studies were
totally unregulated and undirected. My tutor thought it almost a sin to open a
profane play or poem; and my mother,
besides that she might be in some degree trammelled by the religious scruples
which he suggested, had no longer the opportunity to hear me read poetry as
formerly. I found, however, in her dressing-room (where I slept at one time)
some odd volumes of Shak-
36 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
speare, nor can I easily forget the rapture with which I
sate up in my shirt reading them by the light of a fire in her apartment, until
the bustle of the family rising from supper warned me it was time to creep back
to my bed, where I was supposed to have been safely deposited since nine
o’clock. Chance, however, threw in my way a poetical preceptor. This was
no other than the excellent and benevolent Dr
Blacklock, well-known at that time as a literary character. I
know not how I attracted his attention, and that of some of the young men who
boarded in his family; but so it was that I became a frequent and favoured
guest. The kind old man opened to me the stores of his library, and through his
recommendation I became intimate with Ossian and Spenser. I
was delighted with both, yet I think chiefly with the latter poet. The tawdry
repetitions of the Ossianic phraseology disgusted me rather sooner than might
have been expected from my age. But Spenser I could have
read for ever. Too young to trouble myself about the allegory, I considered all
the knights and ladies and dragons and giants in their outward and exoteric
sense, and God only knows how delighted I was to find myself in such society.
As I had always a wonderful facility in retaining in my memory whatever verses
pleased me, the quantity of Spenser’s stanzas which
I could repeat was really marvellous. But this memory of mine was a very fickle
ally, and has through my whole life acted merely upon its own capricious
motion, and might have enabled me to adopt old Beattie of Meikledale’s answer, when complimented by a
certain reverend divine on the strength of the same faculty:— “No, sir,” answered the old
Borderer, “I have no command of my memory. It only retains what hits
my fancy, and probably, sir, if you were to preach to me for two hours, I
would not be able when you finished to remember a word you had been
saying.” My memory was precisely of the same kind; it seldom
failed to preserve most tenaciously a favourite passage of poetry, a playhouse
ditty, or, above all, a Border-raid ballad; but names, dates, and the other
technicalities of history, escaped me in a most melancholy degree. The
philosophy of history, a much more important subject, was also a sealed book at
this period of my life; but I gradually assembled much of what was striking and
picturesque in historical narrative; and when, in riper years, I attended more
to the deduction of general principles, I was furnished with a powerful host of
examples in illustration of them. I was, in short, like an ignorant gamester,
who kept up a good hand until he knew how to play it.
I left the High School, therefore, with a great quantity of
general information, ill arranged, indeed, and collected without system, yet
deeply impressed upon my mind; readily assorted by my power of connexion and
memory, and gilded, if I may be permitted to say so, by a vivid and active
imagination. If my studies were not under any direction at Edinburgh, in the
country, it may be well imagined, they were less so. A respectable subscription
library, a circulating library of ancient standing, and some private
book-shelves, were open to my random perusal, and I waded into the stream like
a blind man into a ford, without the power
38 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
of searching my
way, unless by groping for it. My appetite for books was as ample and
indiscriminating as it was indefatigable, and I since have had too frequently
reason to repent that few ever read so much, and to so little purpose.
Among the valuable acquisitions I made about this time was an
acquaintance with Tasso’s Jerusalem Delivered, through the flat
medium of Mr Hoole’s translation. But above all, I
then first became acquainted with Bishop
Percy’s Reliques of Ancient Poetry. As I had been from infancy devoted to
legendary lore of this nature, and only reluctantly withdrew my attention, from
the scarcity of materials and the rudeness of those which I possessed, it may
be imagined, but cannot be described, with what delight I saw pieces of the
same kind which had amused my childhood, and still continued in secret the
Delilahs of my imagination, considered
as the subject of sober research, grave commentary, and apt illustration, by an
editor who showed his poetical genius was capable of emulating the best
qualities of what his pious labour preserved. I remember well the spot where I
read these volumes for the first time. It was beneath a huge platanus-tree, in
the ruins of what had been intended for an old-fashioned arbour in the garden I have mentioned. The summer day sped onward so
fast, that notwithstanding the sharp appetite of thirteen, I forgot the hour of
dinner, was sought for with anxiety, and was still found entranced in my
intellectual banquet. To read and to remember was in this instance the same
thing, and henceforth I overwhelmed my schoolfellows, and all who would hearken
to me,
with tragical recitations from
the ballads of Bishop Percy. The first time, too, I could
scrape a few shillings together, which were not common occurrences with me, I
bought unto myself a copy of these beloved volumes, nor do I believe I ever
read a book half so frequently, or with half the enthusiasm. About this period
also I became acquainted with the works of Richardson, and those of Mackenzie (whom in later years I became entitled to call my
friend) with Fielding, Smollet, and some others of our best
novelists.
To this period also I can trace distinctly the awaking of
that delightful feeling for the beauties of natural objects which has never
since deserted me. The neighbourhood of Kelso, the most beautiful, if not the
most romantic village in Scotland, is eminently calculated to awaken these
ideas. It presents objects, not only grand in themselves, but venerable from
their association. The meeting of two superb rivers, the Tweed and the Teviot,
both renowned in song—the ruins of an ancient Abbey—the more distant vestiges
of Roxburgh Castle—the modern mansion of Fleurs, which is so situated as to
combine the ideas of ancient baronial grandeur with those of modern taste—are
in themselves objects of the first class; yet are so mixed, united, and melted
among a thousand other beauties of a less prominent description, that they
harmonize into one general picture, and please rather by unison than by
concord. I believe I have written unintelligibly upon this subject, but it is
fitter for the pencil than the pen. The romantic feelings which I have
described as predominating in my mind, naturally rested upon and associated
themselves
40 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
with these grand features of the landscape
around me; and the historical incidents, or traditional legends connected with
many of them, gave to my admiration a sort of intense impression of reverence,
which at times made my heart feel too big for its bosom. From this time the
love of natural beauty, more especially when combined with ancient ruins, or
remains of our fathers’ piety or splendour, became with me an insatiable
passion, which, if circumstances had permitted, I would willingly have
gratified by travelling over half the globe.
I was recalled to Edinburgh about the time when the College
meets, and put at once to the Humanity class, under Mr Hill, and the first Greek class, taught by Mr Dalzell. The former held the reins of
discipline very loosely, and though beloved by his students, for he was a
good-natured man as well as a good scholar, he had not the art of exciting our
attention as well as liking. This was a dangerous character with whom to trust
one who relished labour as little as I did, and amid the riot of his class I
speedily lost much of what I had learned under Adam and Whale. At the
Greek class, I might have made a better figure, for Professor
Dalzell maintained a great deal of authority, and was not only
himself an admirable scholar, but was always deeply interested in the progress
of his students. But here lay the villany. Almost all my companions who had
left the High School at the same time with myself, had acquired a smattering of
Greek before they came to College. I, alas! had none; and finding myself far
inferior to all my fellow-students, I could hit upon no better mode of
vindicating my equality than by
professing my contempt for the language, and my resolution not to learn it. A
youth who died early, himself an excellent Greek scholar, saw my negligence and
folly with pain, instead of contempt. He came to call on me in George’s
Square, and pointed out in the strongest terms the silliness of the conduct I
had adopted, told me I was distinguished by the name of the Greek Blockhead, and exhorted me to redeem my reputation while it was
called to-day. My stubborn pride received this advice with sulky civility; the
birth of my Mentor (whose name was Archibald, the son of
an inn-keeper) did not, as I thought in my folly, authorize him to intrude upon
me his advice. The other was not sharp-sighted, or his consciousness of a
generous intention overcame his resentment. He offered me his daily and nightly
assistance, and pledged himself to bring me forward with the foremost of my
class. I felt some twinges of conscience, but they were unable to prevail over
my pride and self-conceit. The poor lad left me more in sorrow than in anger,
nor did we ever meet again. All hopes of my progress in the Greek were now
over; insomuch that when we were required to write essays on the authors we had
studied, I had the audacity to produce a composition in which I weighed
Homer against Ariosto, and pronounced him wanting in the
balance. I supported this heresy by a profusion of bad reading and flimsy
argument. The wrath of the Professor was extreme, while at the same time he
could not suppress his surprise at the quantity of out-of-the-way knowledge
which I displayed. He pronounced upon me the severe sen-42 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
tence—that dunce I was, and dunce was to remain—which, however, my excellent
and learned friend lived to revoke over a bottle of Burgundy, at our literary
club at Fortune’s, of which he was a distinguished member.
Mean while, as if to eradicate my slightest tincture of
Greek, I fell ill during the middle of Mr
Dalzell’s second class, and migrated a second time to
Kelso where I again continued a long time reading what and how I pleased, and
of course reading nothing but what afforded me immediate entertainment. The
only thing which saved my mind from utter dissipation was that turn for
historical pursuit, which never abandoned me even at the idlest period. I had
forsworn the Latin classics for no reason I know of, unless because they were
akin to the Greek, but the occasional perusal of Buchanan’s history, that of Mathew Paris, and other monkish chronicles, kept up a kind of
familiarity with the language even in its rudest state. But I forgot the very
letters of the Greek alphabet; a loss never to be repaired, considering what
that language is, and who they were who employed it in their compositions.
About this period—or soon afterwards—my father judged it
proper I should study mathematics, a study upon which I entered with all the
ardour of novelty. My tutor was an aged person, Dr
MacFait, who had in his time been distinguished as a teacher of
this science. Age, however, and some domestic inconveniences, had diminished
his pupils, and lessened his authority amongst the few who remained. I think
that had I been more fortunately placed for instruction, or had I had the spur
of emulation, I might have made some progress in this
science, of which under the circumstances I have
mentioned I only acquired a very superficial smattering.
In other studies I was rather more fortunate; I made some
progress in Ethics under Professor John
Bruce, and was selected as one of his students whose progress he
approved, to read an essay before Principal
Robertson. I was farther instructed in Moral Philosophy at the
class of Mr Dugald Stewart, whose
striking and impressive eloquence riveted the attention even of the most
volatile student. To sum up my academical studies, I attended the class of
History, then taught by the present Lord
Woodhouselee, and, as far as I remember, no others, excepting
those of the civil and municipal law. So that if my learning be flimsy and
inaccurate, the reader must have some compassion even for an idle workman, who
had so narrow a foundation to build upon. If, however, it should ever fall to
the lot of youth to peruse these pages—let such a reader remember that it is
with the deepest regret that I recollect in my manhood the opportunities of
learning which I neglected in my youth; that through every part of my literary
career I have felt pinched and hampered by my own ignorance; and that I would
at this moment give half the reputation I have had the good fortune to acquire,
if by doing so I could rest the remaining part upon a sound foundation of
learning and science.
I imagine my father’s reason for sending me to so few classes in the
College, was a desire that I should apply myself particularly to my legal
studies. He had not determined whether I should fill the situation of an
Advocate or a Writer; but judiciously considering the
44 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
technical knowledge of the latter to be useful at least, if not essential, to a
barrister, he resolved I should serve the ordinary apprenticeship of five years
to his own profession. I accordingly entered into indentures with my father
about 1785-6, and entered upon the dry and barren wilderness of forms and
conveyances.
I cannot reproach myself with being entirely an idle
apprentice—far less, as the reader might reasonably have expected,
“A clerk foredoom’d my father’s soul to
cross.” |
The drudgery, indeed, of the office I disliked, and the confinement I
altogether detested; but I loved my father, and I felt the rational pride and
pleasure of rendering myself useful to him. I was ambitious also; and among my
companions in labour the only way to gratify ambition was to labour hard and
well. Other circumstances reconciled me in some measure to the confinement. The
allowance for copy-money furnished a little fund for the menus plaisirs of the circulating library
and the Theatre; and this was no trifling incentive to labour. When actually at
the oar, no man could pull it harder than I, and I remember writing upwards of
120 folio pages with no interval either for food or rest. Again, the hours of
attendance on the office were lightened by the power of choosing my own books
and reading them in my own way, which often consisted in beginning at the
middle or the end of a volume. A deceased friend, who was a fellow apprentice
with me, used often to express his surprise that, after such a
hop-step-and-jump perusal, I knew as much of the book as he had been able to acquire from reading it in the
usual manner. My desk usually contained a store of most miscellaneous volumes,
especially works of fiction of every kind, which were my supreme delight. I
might except novels, unless those of the better and higher class, for though I
read many of them, yet it was with more selection than might have been
expected. The whole Jemmy and Jenny
Jessamy tribe I abhorred, and it required the art of Burney, or the feeling of Mackenzie, to fix my attention upon a domestic
tale. But ail that was adventurous and romantic I devoured without much
discrimination, and I really believe I have read as much nonsense of this class
as any man now living. Every thing which touched on knight-errantry was
particularly acceptable to me, and I soon attempted to imitate what I so
greatly admired. My efforts, however, were in the manner of the tale-teller,
not of the bard.
My greatest intimate, from the days of my school-tide, was
Mr John Irving, now a Writer to the
Signet. We lived near each other, and by joint agreement were wont, each of us,
to compose a romance for the other’s amusement. These legends, in which
the martial and the miraculous always predominated, we rehearsed to each other
during our walks, which were usually directed to the most solitary spots about
Arthur’s Seat and Salisbury Crags. We naturally sought seclusion, for we
were conscious no small degree of ridicule would have attended our amusement,
if the nature of it had become known. Whole holidays were spent in this
singular pastime, which continued for two or three years, and had, I believe,
no small effect in
46 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
directing the turn of my imagination to
the chivalrous and romantic in poetry and prose.
Mean while, the translations of Mr Hoole having made me acquainted with Tasso and Ariosto, I learned from his notes on the latter, that the
Italian language contained a fund of romantic lore. A part of my earnings was
dedicated to an Italian class which I attended twice a-week, and rapidly
acquired some proficiency. I had previously renewed and extended my knowledge
of the French language, from the same principle of romantic research. Tressan’s romances, the
Bibliothèque Bleue, and Bibliothèque de Romans, were already familiar
to me, and I now acquired similar intimacy with the works of Dante, Boiardo, Pulci, and
other eminent Italian authors. I fastened also, like a tiger, upon every
collection of old songs or romances which chance threw in my way, or which my
scrutiny was able to discover on the dusty shelves of John Sibbald’s circulating library in
the Parliament Square. This collection, now dismantled and dispersed, contained
at that time many rare and curious works, seldom found in such a collection.
Mr Sibbald himself, a man of rough manners but of some
taste and judgment, cultivated music and poetry, and in his shop I had a
distant view of some literary characters, besides the privilege of ransacking
the stores of old French and Italian books, which were in little demand among
the bulk of his subscribers. Here I saw the unfortunate Andrew Macdonald, author of Vimonda; and here, too, I saw at a
distance the boast of Scotland, Robert
Burns. Of the latter I shall presently have occasion to speak
more folly.
I am inadvertently led to confound dates while I talk of this
remote period, for, as I have no notes, it is impossible for me to remember
with accuracy the progress of studies, if they deserve the name, so irregular
and miscellaneous. But about the second year of my apprenticeship, my health,
which, from rapid growth and other causes, had been hitherto rather uncertain
and delicate, was affected by the breaking of a blood-vessel. The regimen I had
to undergo on this occasion was far from agreeable. It was Spring, and the
weather raw and cold, yet I was confined to bed with a single blanket, and bled
and blistered till I scarcely had a pulse left. I had all the appetite of a
growing boy, but was prohibited any sustenance beyond what was absolutely
necesary for the support of nature, and that in vegetables alone. Above all,
with a considerable disposition to talk, I was not permitted to open my lips
without one or two old ladies who watched my couch being ready at once to souse
upon me, “imposing silence with a stilly sound.” My only
refuge was reading and playing at chess. To the romances and poetry, which I
chiefly delighted in, I had always added the study of history, especially as
connected with military events. I was encouraged in this latter study by a
tolerable acquaintance with geography, and by the opportunities I had enjoyed
while with Mr MacFait to learn the
meaning of the more ordinary terms of fortification. While, therefore, I lay in
this dreary and silent solitude, I fell upon the resource of illustrating the
battles I read of by the childish expedient of arranging shells, and seeds, and
pebbles, so as to represent encountering armies.
48 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
Diminutive
cross-bows were contrived to mimic artillery, and with the assistance of a
friendly carpenter, I contrived to model a fortress, which, like that of Uncle
Toby, represented whatever place happened to be uppermost in my imagination. I
fought my way thus through Vertot’s Knights of Malta—a book which, as it hovered between history and
romance, was exceedingly dear to me; and Orme’s interesting and beautiful History of Indostan, whose copious plans,
aided by the clear and luminous explanations of the author, rendered my
imitative amusement peculiarly easy. Other moments of these weary weeks were
spent in looking at the Meadow Walks, by assistance of a combination of mirrors
so arranged that, while lying in bed, I could see the troops march out to
exercise, or any other incident which occurred on that promenade.
After one or two relapses, my constitution recovered the
injury it had sustained, though for several months afterwards I was restricted
to a severe vegetable diet. And I must say, in passing, that though I gained
health under this necessary restriction, yet it was far from being agreeable to
me, and I was affected whilst under its influence with a nervousness which I
never felt before or since. A disposition to start upon slight alarms—a want of
decision in feeling and acting, which has not usually been my failing—an acute
sensibility to trifling inconveniences—and an unnecessary apprehension of
contingent misfortunes, rise to my memory as connected with my vegetable diet,
although they may very possibly have been entirely the result of the disorder
and not of the cure. Be this as it may, with this illness I bade
farewell both to disease and medicine,
for since that time, till the hour I am now writing, I have enjoyed a state of
the most robust health, having only had to complain of occasional headaches or
stomachic affections, when I have been long without taking exercise or have
lived too convivially—the latter having been occasionally though not habitually
the error of my youth, as the former has been of my advanced life.
My frame gradually became hardened with my constitution, and
being both tall and muscular, I was rather disfigured than disabled by my
lameness. This personal disadvantage did not prevent me from taking much
exercise on horseback, and making long journies on foot, in the course of which
I often walked from twenty to thirty miles a-day. A distinct instance occurs to
me. I remember walking with poor James
Ramsay, my fellow apprentice, now no more, and two other friends
to breakfast at Prestonpans. We spent the forenoon in visiting the ruins at
Seton, and the field of battle at Preston—dined at Prestonpans on tiled haddocks, very sumptuously—drank half a bottle of
port each, and returned in the evening. This could not be less than thirty
miles, nor do I remember being at all fatigued upon the occasion.
These excursions on foot or horseback formed by far my most
favourite amusement. I have all my life delighted in travelling, though I have
never enjoyed that pleasure upon a large scale. It was a propensity which I
sometimes indulged so unduly as to alarm and vex my parents. Wood, water,
wilderness itself had an inexpressible charm for me, and I had a dreamy way of
going much farther than I intended, so that uncon-
50 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
sciously
my return was protracted, and my parents had sometimes serious cause of
uneasiness. For example, I once set out with Mr George
Abercromby* (the son of the immortal General), Mr William Clerk, and some others, to fish in
the lake above Howgate, and the stream which descends from it into the Esk. We
breakfasted at Howgate, and fished the whole day; and while we were on our
return next morning I was easily seduced by William Clerk,
then a great intimate, to visit Pennycuik House, the seat of his family. Here
he and John Irving, and I for their
sake, were overwhelmed with kindness by the late Sir John Clerk and his lady, the present Dowager Lady Clerk. The pleasure of looking at
fine pictures, the beauty of the place, and the nattering hospitality of the
owners, drowned all recollection of home for a day or two. Mean while our
companions, who had walked on without being aware of our digression, returned
to Edinburgh without us, and excited no small alarm in my father’s
household. At length, however, they became accustomed to my escapades. My
father used to protest to me on such occasions that he thought I was born to be
a strolling pedlar, and though the prediction was intended to mortify my
conceit, I am not sure that I altogether disliked it. I was now familiar with
Shakspeare, and thought of Autolycus’s song—
“Jog on, jog on, the foot path way,
And merrily hent the stile-a:
A merry heart goes all the day,
Your sad tires in a mile-a.”
|
My principal object in these excursions was the pleasure of
seeing romantic scenery, or what afforded me at least equal pleasure, the
places which had been distinguished by remarkable historical events. The
delight with which I regarded the former of course had general approbation, but
I often found it difficult to procure sympathy with the interest I felt in the
latter. Yet to me the wandering over the field of Bannockburn was the source of
more exquisite pleasure than gazing upon the celebrated landscape from the
battlements of Stirling castle. I do not by any means infer that I was dead to
the feeling of picturesque scenery; on the contrary, few delighted more in its
general effect. But I was unable with the eye of a painter to dissect the
various parts of the scene, to comprehend how the one bore upon the other, to
estimate the effect which various features of the view had in producing its
leading and general effect. I have never, indeed, been capable of doing this
with precision or nicety, though my latter studies have led me to amend and
arrange my original ideas upon the subject. Even the humble ambition, which I
long cherished, of making sketches of those places which interested me, from a
defect of eye or of hand was totally ineffectual. After long study and many
efforts, I was unable to apply the elements of perspective or of shade to the
scene before me, and was obliged to relinquish in despair an art which I was
most anxious to practise. But show me an old castle or a field of battle, and I
was at home at once, filled it with its combatants in their proper costume, and
overwhelmed my bearers by the enthusiasm of my description. In
52 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
crossing Magus Moor, near St Andrews, the spirit moved me
to give a picture of the assassination of the Archbishop of St Andrews to some fellow-travellers with whom I
was accidentally associated, and one of them, though well acquainted with the
story, protested my narrative had frightened away his night’s sleep. I
mention this to show the distinction between a sense of the picturesque in
action and in scenery. If I have since been able in poetry to trace with some
success the principles of the latter, it has always been with reference to its
general and leading features, or under some alliance with moral feeling; and
even this proficiency has cost me study.—Mean while I endeavoured to make
amends for my ignorance of drawing by adopting a sort of technical memory
respecting the scenes I visited. Wherever I went, I cut a piece of a branch
from a tree—these constituted what I called my log-book; and I intended to have
a set of chess-men out of them, each having reference to the place where it was
cut—as the kings from Falkland and Holy-Rood; the queens from Queen
Mary’s yew-tree at Crookston; the bishops from abbeys or episcopal
palaces; the knights from baronial residences; the rooks from royal fortresses;
and the pawns generally from places worthy of historical note. But this
whimsical design I never carried into execution.
With music it was even worse than with painting. My mother
was anxious we should at least learn Psalmody; but the incurable defects of my
voice and ear soon drove my teacher to despair.* It is only by long
practice that I have acquired the power
of selecting or distinguishing melodies; and although now few things delight or
affect me more than a simple tune sung with feeling, yet I am sensible that
even this pitch of musical taste has only been gained by attention and habit,
and, as it were, by my feeling of the words being associated with the tune. I
have, therefore, been usually unsuccessful in composing words to a tune,
although my friend, Dr Clarke, and other musical
composers, have sometimes been able to make a happy union between their music
and my poetry.
In other points, however, I began to make some amends for the
irregularity of my education. It is well known that in Edinburgh one great spur
to emulation among youthful students is in those associations called literary societies, formed not only for the purpose of
debate, but of composition. These undoubtedly have some disadvantages, where a
bold, petulant, and dispu-
enthusiast in Scottish music, which
he sang most beautifully, had this ungrateful task imposed on him. He
was a man of many accomplishments, but dashed with a bizarrerie of
temper which made them useless to their proprietor. He wrote several
books—as a Tour in
Scotland, &c.—and he made an advantageous marriage, but
fell nevertheless into distressed circumstances, which I had the
pleasure of relieving, if I could not remove. His sense of gratitude
was very strong, and showed itself oddly in one respect. He would never
allow that I had a bad ear; but contended, that if I did not understand
music, it was because I did not choose to learn it. But when he
attended us in George’s Square, our neighbour, Lady Cumming, sent to beg the boys
might not be all flogged precisely at the same hour, as, though she had
no doubt the punishment was deserved, the noise of the concord was
really dreadful. Robert was the
only one of our family who could sing, though my father was musical and a performer on
the violoncello at the gentlemen’s
concerts. [1826]. |
54 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
tatious temper happens to be combined with considerable
information and talent. Still, however, in order to such a person being
actually spoiled by his mixing in such debates, his talents must be of a very
rare nature, or his effrontery must be proof to every species of assault; for
there is generally, in a well-selected society of this nature, talent
sufficient to meet the forwardest, and satire enough to penetrate the most
undaunted. I am particularly obliged to this sort of club for introducing me
about my seventeenth year into the society which at one time I had entirely
dropped; for, from the time of my illness at college, I had had little or no
intercourse with any of my class-companions, one or two only excepted. Now,
however, about 1788, I began to feel and take my ground in society. A ready
wit, a good deal of enthusiasm, and a perception that soon ripened into tact
and observation of character, rendered me an acceptable companion to many young
men whose acquisitions in philosophy and science were infinitely superior to
any thing I could boast.
In the business of these societies—for I was a member of more
than one successively—I cannot boast of having made any great figure. I never
was a good speaker unless upon some subject which strongly animated my
feelings; and, as I was totally unaccustomed to composition, as well as to the
art of generalizing my ideas upon any subject, my literary essays were but very
poor work. I never attempted them unless when compelled to do so by the
regulations of the society, and then I was like the Lord of Castle Rackrent, who was obliged to cut
down a tree to get a few faggots to boil the kettle; for
the quantity of ponderous and miscellaneous knowledge,
which I really possessed on many subjects, was not easily condensed, or brought
to bear upon the object I wished particularly to become master of. Yet there
occurred opportunities when this odd lumber of my brain, especially that which
was connected with the recondite parts of history, did me, as Hamlet says, “yeoman’s
service.” My memory of events was like one of the large,
old-fashioned stone-cannons of the Turks—very difficult to load well and
discharge, but making a powerful effect when by good chance any object did come
within range of its shot. Such fortunate opportunities of exploding with effect
maintained my literary character among my companions, with whom I soon met with
great indulgence and regard. The persons with whom I chiefly lived at this
period of my youth were William Clerk,
already mentioned; James Edmonstoune, of
Newton; George Abercromby; Adam Ferguson, son of the celebrated Professor
Ferguson, and who combined the lightest and most airy temper with the best and
kindest disposition; John Irving,
already mentioned; the Honourable Thomas
Douglas, now Earl of Selkirk; David
Boyle,*—and two or three others, who sometimes plunged deeply
into politics and metaphysics, and not unfrequently “doffed the world
aside, and bid it pass.“*
Looking back on these times, I cannot applaud in all respects
the way in which our days were spent. There was too much idleness, and
sometimes too much
* Now Lord Justice-Clerk. [1826]. |
56 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
conviviality: but our hearts were warm, our minds
honourably bent on knowledge and literary distinction; and if I, certainly the
least informed of the party, may be permitted to bear witness, we were not
without the fair and creditable means of attaining the distinction to which we
aspired. In this society I was naturally led to correct my former useless
course of reading; for—feeling myself greatly inferior to my companions in
metaphysical philosophy and other branches of regular study—I laboured, not
without some success, to acquire at least such a portion of knowledge as might
enable me to maintain my rank in conversation. In this I succeeded pretty well;
but unfortunately then, as often since through my life, I incurred the deserved
ridicule of my friends from the superficial nature of my acquisitions, which
being, in the mercantile phrase, got up for society, very often proved flimsy
in the texture; and thus the gifts of an uncommonly retentive memory and acute
powers of perception were sometimes detrimental to their possessor, by
encouraging him to a presumptuous reliance upon them.
Amidst these studies, and in this society, the time of my
apprenticeship elapsed; and in 1790, or thereabouts, it became necessary that I
should seriously consider to which department of the law I was to attach
myself. My father behaved with the most
parental kindness. He offered, if I preferred his own profession, immediately
to take me into partnership with him, which, though his business was much
diminished, still afforded me an immediate prospect of a handsome independence.
But he did not disguise his wish that I
should relinquish this situation to my younger brother, and embrace the more
ambitious profession of the bar. I had little hesitation in making my
choice—for I was never very fond of money; and in no other particular do the
professions admit of a comparison. Besides, I knew and felt the inconveniences
attached to that of a writer; and I thought (like a young man) many of them
were “ingenio haud subeunda meo.” The appearance
of personal dependence which that profession requires was disagreeable to me;
the sort of connexion between the client and the attorney seemed to render the
latter more subservient than was quite agreeable to my nature; and, besides, I
had seen many sad examples while overlooking my father’s business, that
the utmost exertions, and the best meant services, do not secure the man of business, as he is called, from great loss, and
most ungracious treatment on the part of his employers. The bar, though I was
conscious of my deficiencies as a public speaker, was the line of ambition and
liberty; it was that also for which most of my contemporary friends were
destined. And, lastly, although I would willingly have relieved my father of
the labours of his business, yet I saw plainly we could not have agreed on some
particulars if we had attempted to conduct it together, and that I should
disappoint his expectations if I did not turn to the bar. So to that object my
studies were directed with great ardour and perseverance during the years 1789,
1790, 1791, 1792.
In the usual course of study, the Roman or civil law was the
first object of my attention—the second, the Municipal Law of Scotland. In the
course of reading
58 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
on both subjects, I had the advantage of
studying in conjunction with my friend William
Clerk, a man of the most acute intellects and powerful
apprehension, and who, should he ever shake loose the fetters of indolence by
which he has been hitherto trammelled, cannot fail to be distinguished in the
highest degree. We attended the regular classes of both laws in the University
of Edinburgh. The civil law chair, now worthily filled by Mr Alexander Irving, might at that time be
considered as in abeyance, since the person by whom it was occupied had never been fit for the
situation, and was then almost in a state of dotage. But the Scotch law
lectures were those of Mr David Hume, who
still continues to occupy that situation with as much honour to himself as
advantage to his country. I copied over his lectures twice with my own hand,
from notes taken in the class, and when I have had occasion to consult them, I
can never sufficiently admire the penetration and clearness of conception which
were necessary to the arrangement of the fabric of law, formed originally under
the strictest influence of feudal principles, and innovated, altered, and
broken in upon by the change of times, of habits, and of manners, until it
resembles some ancient castle, partly entire, partly ruinous, partly
dilapidated, patched and altered during the succession of ages by a thousand
additions and combinations, yet still exhibiting, with the marks of its
antiquity, symptoms of the skill and wisdom of its founders, and capable of
being analyzed and made the subject of a methodical plan by an architect who
can understand the various styles of the different ages in which it was
subjected to alteration. Such an
architect has Mr Hume been to the law of Scotland, neither
wandering into fanciful and abstruse disquisitions, which are the more proper
subject of the antiquary, nor satisfied with presenting to his pupils a dry and
undigested detail of the laws in their present state, but combining the past
state of our legal enactments with the present, and tracing clearly and
judiciously the changes which took place, and the causes which led to them.
Under these auspices, I commenced my legal studies. A little
parlour was assigned me in my father’s house, which was spacious and
convenient, and I took the exclusive possession of my new realms with all the
feelings of novelty and liberty. Let me do justice to the only years of my life
in which I applied to learning with stern, steady, and undeviating industry.
The rule of my friend Clerk and myself
was, that we should mutually qualify ourselves for undergoing an examination
upon certain points of law every morning in the week, Sundays excepted. This
was at first to have taken place alternately at each other’s houses, but
we soon discovered that my friend’s resolution was inadequate to severing
him from his couch at the early hour fixed for this exercitation. Accordingly,
I agreed to go every morning to his house, which, being at the extremity of
Prince’s Street, New Town, was a walk of two miles. With great
punctuality, however, I beat him up to his task every morning before seven
o’clock, and in the course of two summers, we went, by way of question
and answer, through the whole of Heineccius’s Analysis of the
Institutes and Pandects, as well as through the smaller
60 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
copy of Erskine’s Institutes of the Law of Scotland. This
course of study enabled us to pass with credit the usual trials, which, by the
regulations of the Faculty of Advocates, must be undergone by every candidate
for admission into their body. My friend William Clerk and
I passed these ordeals on the same days—namely, the civil law trial on the
[30th June, 1791], and the Scots law trial on the [6th July, 1792]. On the
[11th July, 1792], we both assumed the gown with all its duties and honours.
My progress in life during these two or three years had been
gradually enlarging my acquaintance, and facilitating my entrance into good
company. My father and mother, already advanced in life, saw little society at
home, excepting that of near relations, or upon particular occasions, so that I
was left to form connexions in a great measure for myself. It is not difficult
for a youth with a real desire to please and be pleased, to make his way into
good society in Edinburgh—or indeed any where—and my family connexions, if they
did not greatly further, had nothing to embarrass my progress. I was a
gentleman, and so welcome any where, if so be I could behave myself, as
Tony Lumpkin says, “in a
concatenation accordingly.”
* * * * *
George Abercromby, second baron Abercromby (1770-1843)
Son of Sir Ralph Abercromby and early friend of Sir Walter Scott; he was Whig MP for
Edinburgh City (1805-06) and Clackmannanshire (1806-07, 1812-15). He succeeded his mother
in the peerage in 1821.
Alexander Adam (1741-1809)
Scottish classical scholar; educated at Edinburgh University, he was headmaster of
Watson's Hospital (1759) and rector of Edinburgh High School (1768).
Ludovico Ariosto (1474-1533)
Italian poet, author of the epic romance
Orlando Furioso
(1532).
Cardinal David Beaton (1494 c.-1546)
Catholic archbishop of St. Andrews, murdered by the Protestant John Leslie.
Joseph Black (1728-1799)
Scottish chemist; he was professor of medicine at Glasgow (1756-66) and professor of
medicine and chemistry at Edinburgh (1766-97).
Thomas Blacklock (1721-1791)
Blind Scottish poet and clergyman; early in life his cause was taken up by David Hume and
Joseph Spence; later in life he befriended Robert Burns and Walter Scott. His life was
written by Henry Mackenzie.
Hugh Blair (1718-1800)
Scottish man of letters and professor of rhetoric at Edinburgh University; author of the
oft-reprinted
Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, 2 vols (1784)
and much-admired
Sermons, 5 vols (1777, 1780, 1790, 1794,
1801).
Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738)
Professor of botany and medicine at the University of Leiden from 1709.
Matteo Maria Boiardo (1441 c.-1494)
Italian poet and humanist, author of the chivalric romance
Orlando
innamorato (1487).
David Boyle, Lord Shewalton (1772-1853)
Educated at St Andrews and the University of Glasgow, he was MP for Ayrshire (1807-11)
and Lord Justice Clerk (1811-41).
John Bruce (1744-1826)
Professor of Logic at Edinburgh (1778), author of
First Principles of
Philosophy (1780) and
Historical View of Plans for the
Government of British India (1793).
James Buchan (1770-1834)
A classmate of Walter Scott; he was an army physician in Egypt where he maintained a
plague hospital, and late in life was physician of the Royal Public Dispensary.
George Buchanan (1506-1582)
Scottish historian, scholar, and respected Latin poet; he was tutor to James VI. and
author of
Rerum Scoticarum historia (1582).
John Bunyan (1628-1688)
Dissenting preacher and autobiographer; he published
Grace Abounding to
the Chief of Sinners (1666) and
Pilgrim's Progress
(1678).
John Burgoyne (1723-1792)
British general defeated at the Battle of Saratoga; he was more successful as a wit and
poet.
Frances D'Arblay [née Burney] (1752-1840)
English novelist, the daughter of the musicologist Dr. Charles Burney; author of
Evelina; or, The History of a Young Lady's Entrance into the World
(1778),
Cecilia, or Memoirs of an Heiress (1782), and
Camilla (1796).
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
Alexander Campbell (1764-1824)
Scottish composer and associate of Walter Scott whom he once instructed in music; he
published
An Introduction to the History of Poetry in Scotland
(1798).
Archibald Campbell, marquess of Argyll (1605 c.-1661)
Wily Scottish politician who supported the Scottish Church against Charles I, fought with
Montrose, and was executed following the Restoration.
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
George Chalmers (1742-1825)
Scottish antiquary ridiculed by Edmond Malone for defending Ireland's forgeries in
An Apology for the Believers in the Shakspear Papers (1797).
Thomas Chatterton (1752-1770)
The “marvelous boy” of Bristol, whose forgeries of medieval poetry deceived many and
whose early death by suicide came to epitomize the fate neglected genius.
Sir John Clerk, fifth baronet (d. 1798)
The son of Sir George Clerk of Penicuik, fourth baronet (d. 1784); he married Rosemary
Appleby, daughter of Joseph Dacre Appleby.
John Clerk, Lord Eldin (1757-1832)
Edinburgh lawyer and judge; he was a member of the Speculative Society and an original
member of the Bannatyne Club, raised to the bench as Lord Eldin in 1823.
Lady Rosemary Clerk [née Dacre] (1745-1822 fl.)
The daughter of Joseph Dacre Appleby; she married John Clerk of Penicuik, fifth baronet
(d. 1798); a friend of Sir Walter Scott, she lived in Princes Street in Edinburgh.
William Clerk (1771-1847)
Edinburgh lawyer, the son of John Clerk of Eldin and brother of Lord Eldin (1757-1832);
he was Clerk of the Jury Court (1815) and a friend of Sir Walter Scott. He is said to be
the model for Darsie Latimer in
Redgauntlet.
Alison Cockburn [née Rutherford] (1713-1794)
Scottish poet and literary hostess; she married the advocate Patrick Cockburn in 1731 and
late in life was a friend of David Hume, Henry Mackenzie, and Walter Scott.
George Constable (1719-1803)
A friend of Sir Walter Scott's father; he is said to be the original of Jonathan Oldbuck
in
The Antiquary.
Lady Helen Cumming Gordon [née Grant] (d. 1830)
The daughter of Sir Ludovick Grant of Freuchie, seventh baronet; in 1773 married Colonel
Sir Alexander Cumming-Gordon of Altyre, first baronet.
Andrew Dalzel (1742-1806)
Classical scholar and one of the founders of the Royal Society of Edinburgh; he was
professor of Greek at Edinburgh University (1779).
Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)
Florentine poet, the author of the
Divine Comedy and other
works.
John Davidson (1763-1823)
Scottish antiquary; he was Writer to the Signet (1786) and the friend of George Constable
and acquaintance of young Walter Scott.
William Dickson (d. 1803)
Of Sydenham House, Roxburgh, son of Archibald Dickson of Pontefract; he was made
lieutenant in 1755 and vice-admiral of the Blue in 1799.
David Douglas, Lord Reston (d. 1819)
Scottish advocate, heir of Adam Smith, and friend of Walter Scott; he was Sheriff Depute
of Berwickshire and Lord of Justiciary (1816).
Thomas Douglas, fifth earl of Selkirk (1771-1820)
The son of the fourth earl (d. 1799); he settled Highland colonists in Prince Edward
Island, quarreled with the Northwest Fur Company, and published
Observations on the Present State of the Highlands of Scotland (1805). He was an
acquaintance of Walter Scott.
Alexander Duncan (1708-1795)
He was minister of Smailholm in Roxburgshire from 1743 and is supposed to be the original
of Joseph Cargil in
St Ronan's Well.
Cornelius Elliot of Woollee (1733-1821)
Writer to the Signet in Edinburgh; in 1765 he married Margaret Rannie (d. 1796). The
journalist William Jerdan studied law with him.
John Erskine of Carnock (1695-1768)
Scottish jurist; in 1737 he was appointed professor of Scots law at Edinburgh University
in succession to Alexander Bayne.
William Erskine, Lord Kinneder (1768-1822)
The son of an episcopal clergyman of the same name, he was a Scottish advocate and a
close friend and literary advisor to Sir Walter Scott.
Sir Adam Ferguson (1771-1855)
Son of the philosopher and classmate and friend of Sir Walter Scott; he served in the
Peninsular Campaign under Wellington, afterwards living on his estate in
Dumfriesshire.
Henry Fielding (1707-1754)
English dramatist, essayist, and novelist; author of
Joseph
Andrews (1742) and
The History of Tom Jones (1749).
Luke Fraser (1736-1821)
He was a classics master at Edinburgh High School for forty years; among his pupils were
Walter Scott and Henry Brougham.
James French (1761 c.-1835)
The son of James French, master at Edinburgh High School. He was ordained in 1786 and was
minister of Carmunnock (1786) and East Kilbride (1791); while in college he had been
private tutor to Walter Scott.
Salomon Gessner (1730-1788)
Swiss poet whose
Idyllen (1756) influenced Southey and other
English writers; he was also the author of a prose epic,
Der Tod
Abels (1758) frequently reprinted in the translation by Mary Collyer
(1761).
Robert Haliburton (1718-1788 c.)
The son of Thomas Haliburton of Newmains; he was an Edinburgh merchant who sold the
family lands in 1767 and died childless.
Thomas Haliburton of Newmains (1670-1753)
On of several of this name; he married Janet, daughter of Robert Campbell of
Northwoodside. In 1728 their daughter Barbara married Robert Scott, grandfather of Sir
Walter Scott.
John Hill (1747 c.-1805)
Educated at St. Andrews University where he was professor of Humanity (Latin) (1773)
before moving to Edinburgh University in 1775; his
Life of Dr. Hugh
Blair was posthumously published in 1807.
John Home (1722-1808)
Scottish playwright and clergyman, the author of
Douglas and
History of the Rebellion, 1745 (1802).
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
John Hoole (1727-1803)
English translator, playwright, and friend of Dr. Johnson; he published
Jerusalem Delivered (1763), an often-reprinted translation reviled by the
romantics.
James Hope (1769-1842)
Son of Dr. John Hope, Edinburgh physician; he was a classmate of Walter Scott and a
Writer to the Signet.
Horace (65 BC-8 BC)
Roman lyric poet; author of
Odes,
Epistles, Satires, and the
Ars Poetica.
David Hume (1757-1838)
The nephew of the philosopher; he was educated at University of Edinburgh and Glasgow
University and was a member of the Speculative Society, professor of Scots law in the
University of Edinburgh, and baron of the exchequer. He contributed to
The Mirror and
The Lounger.
Jesse Huxley [née Scott] (1800-1870)
The daughter of Walter Scott's younger brother Thomas; she married Captain Thomas Huxley
of the 70th Foot in 1819.
Thomas Huxley (d. 1826)
Military officer in Canada, the husband of Sir Walter Scott's niece Jesse Scott; he died
a suicide.
John Irving (1770-1850)
The younger brother of Alexander Irving, Lord Newton; he was Writer to the Signet in
Edinburgh and a friend of Sir Walter Scott.
Flavius Josephus (37-100 c.)
Jewish historian, author of
Bellum Iudaicum and
Antiquitates Iudaicae.
John Knox (1514 c.-1572)
The founder of Presbyterianism in Scotland.
Livy (59 BC c.-17)
Roman historian; of his
History of Rome 35 books survive.
Andrew Macdonald [Matthew Bramble] (1757-1790)
Scottish poet, playwright, and musician who sought his fortune in London and died in
poverty; his memorable life was recorded by Isaac D'Israeli in
Calamities
of Authors.
Henry Mackenzie (1745-1831)
Scottish man of letters, author of
The Man of Feeling (1770) and
editor of
The Mirror (1779-80) and
The
Lounger (1785-87).
Ebenezer Macfait (d. 1786)
Scottish physician and miscellaneous writer, author of
Remarks on the
Life and Writings of Plato (1760); he tutored Walter Scott in mathematics.
Barbara Meik [née Scott] (1771-1845)
Walter Scott's cousin, the daughter of Thomas Scott; in 1805 she married Patrick Meik (d.
1819).
Cornelius Nepos (100 BC c.-25 BC c.)
Roman biographer and friend of Cicero, author of
De viris
illustribus.
William Nichol (1744-1797)
Scottish schoolmaster and friend of Robert Burns; he was educated at Edinburgh
University, where he was a master in the High School (1774-95).
Robert Orme (1728-1801)
Associate of Robert Clive and historian of India; author of
History of
the Military Transactions of the British Nation in Indostan (1763, 1778) and
Historical Fragments of the Mogul Empire (1782).
Ossian (250 fl.)
Legendary blind bard of Gaelic story to whom James Macpherson attributed his poems
Fingal and
Temora.
Matthew Paris (1200 c.-1259)
Benedictine monk, historian, and manuscript illuminator.
Thomas Percy, bishop of Dromore (1729-1811)
Poet, man of letters, and editor of
Reliques of Ancient English
Poetry (1765); he was a member of Samuel Johnson's circle.
Persius (34-62)
Roman poet, the author of six surviving satires.
Archibald Pitcairn (1652-1713)
Scottish physician, poet, and Jacobite; he was professor of medicine at Leyden
(1692).
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
English poet and satirist; author of
The Rape of the Lock (1714)
and
The Dunciad (1728).
Mark Pringle of Crichton (d. 1751)
The third son of Andrew Pringle of Clifton; in 1707 he killed Walter Scott, third laird
of Raeburn.
Luigi Pulci (1432-1484)
Italian poet patronized by the Medici family; author of the
Il
Morgante (1483).
Allan Ramsay (1684-1758)
Scottish poet, author of the pastoral comedy,
The Gentle Shepherd
(1725).
James Ramsay (d. 1798)
The son of the architect James Ramsay; after serving an apprenticeship with Walter
Scott's father he was Writer to the Signet.
Samuel Richardson (1689-1761)
English printer and novelist; author of
Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded
(1739) and
Clarissa, or the History of a Young Lady
(1747-48).
William Robertson (1721-1793)
Educated at Edinburgh University of which he became principal (1762), he was a
highly-regarded historian, the author of
History of Scotland in the Reign
of Queen Mary and of King James VI (1759) and
The History of the
Reign of Charles V (1769).
George Bridges Rodney, first baron Rodney (1718-1792)
Read admiral (1759) and MP; he fought in Seven Years' War, defeated the Spanish off Cape
Vincent (1780) and the French under De Grasse off Dominica in 1782.
Elizabeth Rowe [née Singer] (1674-1737)
English devotional writer and friend of the Countess of Hertford; author of
Friendship in Death (1728).
Christian Rutherford (1759-1819)
The daughter of Professor John Rutherford by his second wife; she was the half-sister of
Anne, mother of Sir Walter Scott (who referred to her as “Miss Critty”).
Daniel Rutherford (1749-1819)
Scottish physician and botanist, the son of Professor John Rutherford; after study at
Edinburgh University he was physician-in-ordinary to the Royal Infirmary (1791). He was Sir
Walter Scott's uncle.
Janet Rutherford (1753-1812)
The daughter of Professor John Rutherford by his second wife; she was the half-sister of
Anne, mother of Sir Walter Scott.
John Rutherford (1695-1779)
Scottish physician educated at the University of Edinburgh where he was professor of
physic from 1726. He was Sir Walter Scott's maternal grandfather.
Sallust (86 BC-35 BC)
Roman historian; author of
The War against Jugurtha and
The Conspiracy of Cataline.
Richard Savage (1698-1743)
Maladroit English poet, the reputed son of Earl Rivers, who was immortalized by Samuel
Johnson in his
Life of Savage (1744).
Anna Scott, duchess of Monmouth and Buccleuch (1651-1732)
The third daughter of Francis Scott, second earl of Buccleuch; in 1663 she married James,
duke of Monmouth, and after his execution, in 1688 she was remarried to Charles, third
Baron Cornwallis.
Anne Scott [née Rutherford] (1739 c.-1819)
Walter Scott's mother, the daughter of Professor John Rutherford who married Walter Scott
senior in 1755.
Anne Scott (1772-1801)
Walter Scott's younger and only sister; an earlier sister of the same name had died in
childhood.
Daniel Scott (1776 c.-1806)
The dissolute younger brother of Sir Walter Scott who emigrated to Jamaica in
1804.
Janet Scott (d. 1805)
Walter Scott's aunt, the daughter of Robert Scott of Sandyknowe; she died
unmarried.
John Scott (1769-1816)
Walter Scott's elder brother who served in the 73rd Regiment before retiring to Edinburgh
in 1810.
Robert Scott (1699-1775)
The grandfather of Sir Walter Scott; he was a younger son of Walter “Beardie” Scott who
farmed Sandyknowe near Roxburgh. He married Barbara, daughter of Thomas Haliburton.
Robert Scott of Rosebank (1739-1804)
The uncle of Sir Walter Scott; he was a naval officer who retired to Rosebank near Kelso
in 1771.
Robert Scott (1767-1787)
The elder brother of Sir Walter Scott; he was a naval officer who enlisted in 1778 and
died on board the
Rodney.
Thomas Scott (1731-1823)
Walter Scott's uncle, the second son of Robert Scott of Sandyknowe. He was twice married,
first to Anne Scott, daughter of the fourth laird of Raeburn, and secondly to Jean
Rutherford of Knowsouth.
Thomas Scott (1774-1823)
The younger brother of Walter Scott rumored to have written
Waverley; after working in the family legal business he was an officer in the
Manx Fencibles (1806-10) and Paymaster of the 70th Foot (1812-14). He died in
Canada.
Walter Scott of Raeburn (d. 1707)
Walter Scott's great-granduncle, son of Sir William Scott, first laird of Raeburn. He was
killed in a duel with Mark Pringle of Crichton.
Walter Scott [Beardie] (1653-1729)
Walter Scott's great-grandfather, son of Walter Scott, first laird of Raeburn. He was a
Jacobite said to have let his beard grow in mourning for the demise of the Stuarts.
Walter Scott (1729-1799)
Walter Scott's father, son of Robert Scott of Sandyknowe; he was Writer to the Signet in
Edinburgh.
James Sibbald (1747-1803)
Proprietor of the Edinburgh Circulating Library founded by Allan Ramsay; he also
published the
Edinburgh Magazine, or, Literary Miscellany
(1785).
Adam Smith (1723-1790)
Friend of David Hume and professor of logic at Glasgow University (1751); he wrote
Theory of the Moral Sentiments (1759) and
The
Wealth of Nations (1776).
Tobias Smollett (1721-1771)
Scottish physician and man of letters; author of the novels
Roderick
Random (1747) and
Humphry Clinker (1771).
Edmund Spenser (1552 c.-1599)
English poet, author of
The Shepheards Calender (1579) and
The Faerie Queene (1590, 1596).
John Spottiswoode, archbishop of St Andrews (1565-1639)
Son of the reformer John Spottiswoode; he accompanied James to London in 1603 and was
made archbishop of St Andrews in 1615. He wrote
History of the Church and
State of Scotland (1655).
Dugald Stewart (1753-1828)
Professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh University (1785-1809); he was author of
Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind (1792-93).
Sir John Swinton (d. 1723)
The son of John Swinton (d. 1679); he was Sir Walter Scott's
maternal-great-grandfather.
Torquato Tasso (1554-1595)
Italian poet, author of
Aminta (1573), a pastoral drama, and
Jerusalem Delivered (1580).
Terence (193 BC c.-159 BC)
Roman comic dramatist, author of
Eunuchus,
Phormio, and other plays.
Réné-Aubert Vertot (1655-1735)
French historian; author of
Histoire de la conjuration de Portugal
(1690) translated as
The History of the Revolution in Portugal, in the
Year 1640 (1700).
Virgil (70 BC-19 BC)
Roman epic poet; author of
Eclogues,
Georgics, and the
Aenead.
George Washington (1732-1799)
Revolutionary general and first president of the United States.
Lancelot Whale (1788 fl.)
He was Rector of the Kelso grammar school (1780-88) where his pupils included Walter
Scott and James Ballantyne. His son, Robert Wales was a surgeon in the 68th Foot (d.
1793).
John Wilde (1764 c.-1840)
He was president of the Speculative Society and professor of civil law at Edinburgh
University (1792-1800), he became deranged, drawing a salary while another performed his
duties.
Alexander Wood (1726-1807)
Edinburgh surgeon who became a fellow of the College of Surgeons on 14 January 1756; he
was consulted about young Walter Scott's lameness.