Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Chapter XII 1811-12
378 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
CHAPTER XII.
THE POEM OF ROKEBY BEGUN—CORRESPONDENCE WITH
MR MORRITT—DEATH OF HENRY DUKE OF
BUCCLEUCH—GEORGE ELLIS—JOHN
WILSON—APPRENTICES OF EDINBURGH—SCOTT’S
“NICK-NACKATORIES”—LETTER TO MISS BAILLIE ON THE
PUBLICATION OF CHILDE HAROLD—CORRESPONDENCE WITH LORD
BYRON.
1811—1812.
Of the L.4000 which Scott
paid for the original farm of Abbotsford, he borrowed one half from his eldest brother.
Major John Scott; the other moiety was raised by
the Ballantynes, and advanced on the security of the as yet unwritten,
though long meditated poem of Rokeby. He
immediately, I believe by Terry’s counsel,
requested Mr Stark of Edinburgh, an architect of
whose talents he always spoke warmly, to give him a design for an ornamental cottage in the
style of the old English vicarage-house. But before this could be done, Mr
Stark died; and Scott’s letters will show how, in the sequel, his
building plans, checked for a season by this occurrence, gradually expanded,—until twelve
years afterwards the site was occupied not by a cottage but a castle.
His first notions are sketched as follows, in a letter addressed to
Mr Morritt very shortly after the purchase.
“We stay at Ashestiel this season, but migrate the next to our new
settlements. I have fixed only two points
respecting my intended cottage—one is, that ‘it shall be in my garden, or rather
kailyard—the other, that the little drawingroom shall open into a little conservatory,
in which conservatory there shall be a fountain. These are articles of taste which I
have long since determined upon; but I hope before a stone of my paradise is begun we
shall meet and collogue upon it.”
Three months later (December 20th, 1811), he opens the design of his new
poem in another letter to the squire of Rokeby, whose household, it appears, had just been
disturbed by the unexpected accouchement of a
fair visitant. The allusion to the Quarterly Review, towards the
close, refers to an humorous
article on Sir John Sinclair’s
pamphlets about the Bullion Question—a joint production of Mr
Ellis and Mr Canning.
To J. B. S. Morritt, Esq.
“I received your kind letter a week or two ago. The
little interlude of the bantling at Rokeby reminds me of a lady whose mother
happened to produce her upon very short notice, between the hands of a game at
whist, and who, from a joke of the celebrated David
Hume, who was one of the players, lived long distinguished by
the name of The Parenthesis. My wife had once nearly
made a similar blunder in very awkward circumstances. We were invited to dine
at Melville Castle (to which we were then near neighbours), with the Chief Baron* and his lady, its temporary
inhabitants,—when behold, the Obadiah whom
I despatched two hours before dinner from our cottage to summon the Dr Slop of Edinburgh, halting at Melville Lodge
to rest his wearied horse,
380 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
make apologies, and so forth, encountered the Melville
Castle Obadiah sallying on the identical
errand, for the identical man of skill, who, like an active knight-errant,
relieved the two distressed dames within three hours of each other. A blessed
duet they would have made if they had put off their crying bout, as it is
called, till they could do it in concert.
“And now, I have a grand project to tell you of.
Nothing less than a fourth romance, in verse; the theme, during the English
civil wars of Charles I., and the scene,
your own domain of Rokeby. I want to build my cottage a little better than my
limited finances will permit out of my ordinary income; and although it is very
true that an author should not hazard his reputation, yet, as Bob Acres says, I really think Reputation should
take some care of the gentleman in return. Now, I have all your scenery deeply
imprinted in my memory, and moreover, be it known to you, I intend to refresh
its traces this ensuing summer, and to go as far as the borders of Lancashire,
and the caves of Yorkshire, and so perhaps on to Derbyshire. I have sketched a
story which pleases me, and I am only anxious to keep my theme quiet, for its
being piddled upon by some of your Ready-to-catch
literati, as John Bunyan calls them,
would be a serious misfortune to me. I am not without hope of seducing you to
be my guide a little way on my tour. Is there not some book (sense or nonsense,
I care not) on the beauties of Teesdale I mean a descriptive work? If you can
point it out or lend it me, you will do me a great favour, and no less if you
can tell me any traditions of the period. By which party was Barnard Castle
occupied? It strikes me that it should be held for the Parliament. Pray, help
me in this, by truth, or fiction, or tradition,—I care not which, if it be
picturesque. What the deuce is the name of that wild glen, where we had
such a clamber on horseback up a stone
staircase?—Cat’s Cradle, or Cat’s Castle, I think it was. I wish
also to have the true edition of the traditionary tragedy of your old house at
Mortham, and the ghost thereunto appertaining, and you will do me
yeoman’s service in compiling the relics of so valuable a legend. Item—Do
you know any thing of a striking ancient castle belonging, I think, to the
Duke of Leeds, called Coningsburgh?*
Grose notices it, but in a very
flimsy manner. I once flew past it on the mail-coach, when its round tower and
flying buttresses had a most romantic effect in the morning dawn.
“The Quarterly is beyond my praise, and as much beyond me as I was
beyond that of my poor old nurse who died the other day. Sir John Sinclair has gotten the golden fleece
at last. Dogberry would not desire a richer
reward for having been written down an ass. L.6000 a-year!† Good faith,
the whole reviews in Britain should rail at me, with my free consent, better
cheap by at least a cypher. There is no chance, with all my engagements, to be
at London this spring. My little boy Walter is ill with the measles, and I expect the rest to catch
the disorder, which appears,* thank God, very mild. Mrs
Scott joins in kindest compliments to Mrs Morritt, many merry Christmases to you and
believe me, truly yours,
I insert Mr Morritt’s
answer, both for the light which
382 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
it throws on various particular passages in the poem as we have it,
and because it shows that some of those features in the general plan, which were
unfavourably judged on its publication, had been early and very strongly recommended to the
poet’s own consideration by the person whom, on this occasion, he was most anxious to
please.
To Walter Scott, Esq.
“Rokeby, 28th December, 1811.
“I begin at the top of my paper, because your
request must be complied with, and I foresee that a letter on the antiquities
of Teesdale will not be a short one. Your project delights me much, and I
willingly contribute my mite to its completion. Yet, highly as I approve of the
scene where you lay the events of your romance, I have, I think, some
observations to make as to the period you have chosen for it. Of this, however,
you will be a better judge after I have detailed my antiquarian researches.
Now, as to Barnard Castle, it was built in Henry
I.’s time, by Barnard, son of
Guy Baliol, who landed with the Conqueror. It remained
with the Baliols till their attainder by Edward I. The tomb of Alan of Galloway was here in Leland’s time; and he gives the inscription.
Alan, if you remember, married Margaret of
Huntingdon, David’s
daughter, and was father, by her, of Devorgild, who married John
Baliol, and from whom her son, John
Baliol, claimed the crown of Scotland. Edward
I. granted the castle and liberties to Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick; it descended (with that title) to
the Nevills, and by Ann Nevill to
Richard Duke of Gloucester, afterwards King Richard III. It does not appear to whom
Henry VII. or his son re-granted it, but
it fell soon into the hands of the Nevills, Earls of Westmoreland, by whom it
was
| LETTER FROM MR MORRITT. | 383 |
forfeited in the rising
of the North. It was granted by
James I. to
the citizens of London, from whom
Sir Henry
Vane received it by purchase. It does not seem to have ever been
used as a place of strength after the rising of the North; and when the Vanes
bought it of the citizens, it was probably in a dismantled state. It was,
however, a possession of the Vanes before the Civil Wars, and, therefore, with
a safe conscience you may swear it stood for the Parliament. The lady for whose
ghost you enquire at Rokeby, has been so buried in uncertainty, you may make
what you like of her. The most interesting fiction makes her the heiress of the
Rokebys, murdered in the woods of the Greta by a greedy collateral who
inherited the estate. She reached the house before she expired, and her blood
was extant in my younger days at Mortham tower. Others say it was a
Lady Rokeby, the wife of the owner, who was shot in
the walks by robbers; but she certainly became a ghost, and, under the very
poetic
nom de guerre of
Mortham Dobby, she appeared dressed as a fine lady,
with a piece of white silk trailing behind her—without a head, indeed (though
no tradition states how she lost so material a member), but with many of its
advantages for she had long hair on her shoulders and eyes, nose, and mouth, in
her breast. The parson once, by talking Latin to her, confined her under the
bridge that crosses the Greta at my dairy, but the arch being destroyed by
floods in 1771, became incapable of containing a ghost any longer, and she was
seen after that time by some of the older parishioners. I often heard of her in
my early youth, from a sibyl who lived in the park to the age of 105, but since
her death I believe the history has become obsolete.
“The Rokebys were at all times
loyal, at least from Henry IV. downward. They
lived early at Mortham
384 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
tower, which was, I believe, a
better building than the tower of Rokeby, for here also was one where my house
now stands. I fancy they got Mortham by marriage.* Colonel
Rokeby, the last possessor of the old blood, was ruined in the
Civil Wars by his loyalty and unthriftiness, and the estates were bought by the
Robinsons, one of whom the
long
Sir Thomas Robinson, so well-known and
well-quizzed in the time of our grandfathers, after laying out most of the
estate on this place, sold the place and the estate together to my father in
1769.
Oliver Cromwell paid a visit to
Barnard Castle in his way from Scotland, October, 1648. He does not seem to
have been in the castle, but lodged in the town, whence I conclude the castle
was then uninhabitable. Now I would submit to you, whether, considering the
course of events, it would not be expedient to lay the time of your romance as
early as the War of the Roses. For, 1st. As you seem to hint that there will be
a ghost or two in it, like the King of Bohemia’s
giants, they will be ‘more out of the way.’ 2d. Barnard Castle, at
the time I propose, belonged to Nevills and
Plantagenets, of whom something advantageous
(according to your cavalier views) may be brought forward; whereas, a short
time before the Civil Wars of the Parliament, the Vanes
became possessors, and still remain so; of whom, if any Tory bard should be
able to say any thing obliging, it will certainly be ‘
insigne, recens, adhuc indicium ore
alio,’ and do honour to his powers of imagination. 3d. The
knights of Rokeby itself were of high rank and fair domain at the earlier
* The heiress of Mortham married
Rokeby in the reign of Edward II.; and his own castle at Rokeby having been
destroyed by the Scotch after the battle of Bannockburn, he built one
on his wife’s estate—the same of which considerable remains still
exist—on the northern bank of the Greta. |
| LETTER FROM MR MORR1TT—DEC. 1811. | 385 |
period, and were
ruining themselves ignobly at the other. 4th. Civil war for civil war; the
first had two poetical sides, and the last only one; for the roundheads, though
I always thought them politically right, were sad materials for poetry; even
Milton cannot make much of them. I
think no time suits so well with a romance, of which the scene lies in this
country, as the Wars of the two Roses—unless you sing the rising of the North;
and then you will abuse
Queen Elizabeth,
and be censured as an abettor of Popery. How you would be involved in political
controversy—with all our Whigs, who are anti-Stuarts; and all our Tories, who
are anti-Papistical! I therefore see no alternative but boldly to venture back
to the days of the holy
King Harry; for, God
knows, it is difficult to say any thing civil of us since that period. Consider
only, did not Cromwell himself pray that the Lord would
deliver him from
Sir Harry Vane? and what
will you do with him? still more, if you take into the account the improvements
in and about the castle to which yourself was witness when we visited it
together?*
“There is a book of a few pages, describing the
rides through and about Teesdale; I have it not, but if I can get it I will
send it. It is very bare of information, but gives names. If you can get the
third volume of Hutchinson’s History of Durham, it would give you some
useful bits of information, though very ill written. The glen where we
clambered up to Cat-castle is itself called Deepdale. I fear we have few
traditions that have survived the change of farms, and property of all sorts,
* Mr Morritt
alludes to the mutilation of a curious vaulted roof of extreme
antiquity, in the great tower of Barnard Castle, occasioned by its
conversion into a manufactory of patent shot;—an improvement at which
the Poet had expressed some indignation. |
386 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
which has long taken place in this neighbourhood. But we
have some poetical names remaining, of which we none of us know the antiquity,
or at least the origin. Thus, in the scamper we took from Deepdale and
Cat-castle, we rode next, if you remember, to Cotherstone, an ancient village
of the Fitzhughs on the Tees, whence I showed you a rock
rising over the crown of the wood, still called Pendragon Castle. The river
that joins the Tees at Cotherstone is yclept the Balder, I fancy in honour of
the son of Odin; for the farm contiguous to it retains the name of
Woden’s Croft. The parish in which it stands is Romaldkirk, the church of
St Romald the hermit, and was once a hermitage itself in Teesdale forest. The
parish next to Rokeby, on the Tees below my house, is Wycliff, where the old
reformer was born, and the day-star
of the Reformation first rose on England. The family of Rokeby, who were the
proprietors of this place, were valiant and knightly. They seem to have had
good possessions at the Conquest (see Doomsday Book); in
Henry III.’s reign they were Sheriffs of Yorkshire. In
Edward II.’s reign,
Froissart informs us, that, when the Scotch
army decamped in the night so ingeniously from Weardale that nobody knew the
direction of their march, a hue and cry was raised after, them, and a reward of
a hundred merks annual value in land was offered by the crown for whoever could
discover them, and that de Rokeby—I think Sir
Ralph—was the fortunate knight who ascertained their quarters on
the moors near Hexham. In the time of
Henry
IV., the High-Sheriff of Yorkshire, who overthrew
Northumberland and drove him to Scotland after
the battle at Shrewsbury, was also a Rokeby. Tradition says that this sheriff
was before this an adherent of the Percys, and was the
identical knight who dissuaded
Hotspur
from the enterprise, on whose letter the angry warrior comments so
| LETTER FROM MR MORRITT—DEC. 1811. | 387 |
freely in
Shakspeare. They are indeed, I think,
mentioned as adherents of the Percys in Chevy Chace, and
fought under their banner; I hope, therefore, that they broke that connexion
from pure patriotism, and not for filthy lucre. Such are all the annals that
occur to me at present. If you will come here we can summon a synod of the
oldest women in the country, and you shall cross-examine them as much as you
please. There are many romantic spots, and old names rather than remains of
peels, and towers, once called castles, which belonged to
Scroops, Fitzhughs, and
Nevills, with which you should be intimate before you
finish your poem, and also the abbots and monks of Egglestone, who were old and
venerable people, if you carry your story back into Romish times; and you will
allow that the beauty of the situation deserves it, if you recollect the view
from and near the bridge between me and Barnard Castle. Coningsburgh Castle, a
noble building as you say, stands between Doncaster and Rotherham. I think it
belongs to
Lord Fitzwilliam, but am not
sure. You may easily find the account of it in
Grose, or any of the other antiquarians. The building is a
noble circular tower, buttressed all round, and with walls of immoderate
thickness. It is of a very early era, but I do not know its date,
“I have almost filled my letter with antiquarianism;
but will not conclude without repeating how much your intention has charmed us.
The scenery of our rivers deserves to become classic ground, and I hope the
scheme will induce you to visit and revisit it often. I will contrive to ride
with you to Wenslydale and the Caves at least, and the border of Lancashire,
&c. if I can; and to facilitate that trip, I hope you will bring Mrs Scott here, that our dames may not be
impatient of our absence. ‘I know each dale, and every alley
green,’ between
388 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
Rokeby and the Lakes and
Caves, and have no scruple in recommending my own guidance, under which you
will be far more likely to make discoveries than by yourself; for the people
have many of them no knowledge of their own country. Should I, in consequence
of your celebrity, be obliged to leave Rokeby from the influx of cockney
romancers, artists, illustrators, and sentimental tourists, I shall retreat to
Ashestiel, or to your new cottage, and thus visit on you the sins of your
writings. At all events, however, I shall raise the rent of my inn at Greta
bridge on the first notice of your book, as I hear the people at Callander have
made a fortune by you. Pray give our kindest and best regards to Mrs
Scott, and believe me ever, dear
Scott, yours very truly,
In January, 1812, Scott entered upon
the enjoyment of his proper salary as a clerk of Session, which, with his sheriffdom, gave
him from this time till very near the close of his life, a professional income of L.1600
a-year. On the 11th of the same month he lost his kind friend and first patron, Henry, third Duke of Buccleuch, and fifth of Queensberry.
Both these events are mentioned in the following letter to Joanna Baillie, who, among other things, had told
Scott that the materials for his purse were now on her table, and
expressed her anxiety to know who was the author of some beautiful lines on the recent
death of their friend, James Grahame, the poet of
the Sabbath. These verses had, it
appears, found their way anonymously into the newspapers.
To Miss Joanna Baillie, Hampstead.
“January 17th, 1812.
“My dear friend,
“The promise of the purse has flattered my imagi-
nation so very agreeably that I
cannot help sending you an ancient silver mouth-piece, to which, if it pleases
your taste, you may adapt your intended labours: this, besides, is a genteel
way of tying you down to your promise; and to bribe you still farther, I assure
you it shall not be put to the purpose of holding bank notes or vulgar bullion,
but reserved as a place of deposit for some of my pretty little medals and
nicknackatories. When I do make another poetical effort, I shall certainly
expect the sum you mention from the booksellers, for they have had too good
bargains of me hitherto, and I fear I shall want a great deal of money to make
my cottage exactly what I should like it. Mean while, between ourselves, my
income has been very much increased since I wrote to you, in a different way.
My predecessor in the office of Clerk of Session retired to make room for me,
on the amiable condition of retaining all the emoluments during his life,
which, from my wish to retire from the bar and secure a certain though distant
income, I was induced to consent to; and considering his advanced age and
uncertain health, the bargain was really not a bad one. But alas! like
Sindbad’s old man of the sea, my
coadjutor’s strength increased prodigiously after he had fairly settled
himself on my shoulders, so that after five years’ gratuitous labour I
began to tire of my burden. Fortunately,
Mr
Bankes’ late superannuation act provides a rateable
pension for office-holders obliged to retire after long and faithful services;
and my old friend very handsomely consented to be transferred from my galled
shoulders to the broad back of the public, although he is likely to sustain a
considerable diminution of income by the exchange, to which he has declared
himself willing to submit as a penalty for having lived longer than he or I
expected. To me it will make a difference of
390 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
L.1300
a-year, no trifle to us who have no wish to increase our expense in a single
particular, and who could support it on our former income without
inconvenience. This I tell you in confidence, because I know you will be very
well pleased with any good fortune which comes in my way. Every body who cares
a farthing for poetry is delighted with your volume, and well they may. You
will neither be shocked nor surprised at hearing that
Mr Jeffrey has
announced himself of a contrary
opinion. So, at least, I understand, for our very ideas of what is poetry
differ so widely, that we rarely talk upon these subjects. There is something
in his mode of reasoning that leads me greatly to doubt whether,
notwithstanding the vivacity of his imagination, he really has any
feeling of poetical genius, or whether he has worn it
all off by perpetually sharpening his wit on the grindstone of criticism.
“I am very glad that you met my dear friend,
George Ellis,—a wonderful man, who,
through the life of a statesman and politician, conversing with princes, wits,
fine ladies, and fine gentlemen, and acquainted with all the intrigues and
tracasseries of the cabinets and ruelles of foreign
courts, has yet retained all warm and kindly feelings which render a man
amiable in society, and the darling of his friends.
“The author of the elegy upon poor Grahame, is John
Wilson, a young man of very considerable poetical powers. He is
now engaged in a poem called the Isle of Palms, something in the style of
Southey. He is an eccentric genius,
and has fixed himself upon the banks of Windermere, but occasionally resides in
Edinburgh, where he now is. Perhaps you have seen him;—his father was a wealthy Paisley manufacturer—his
mother a sister of Robert Sym. He seems an excellent, warm-hearted,
| LETTER TO MISS BAILLIE—JAN. 1812. | 391 |
and
enthusiastic young man; something too much, perhaps, of the latter quality,
places him among the list of originals.
“Our streets in Edinburgh are become as insecure as
your houses in Wapping. Only think of a formal association among nearly fifty
apprentices, aged from twelve to twenty, to scour the streets and knock down
and rob all whom they found in their way. This they executed on the last night
of the year with such spirit, that two men have died, and several others are
dangerously ill, from the wanton treatment they received. The watchword of
these young heroes when they met with resistance was—Mar
him, a word of dire import; and which, as they were all armed with
bludgeons loaded with lead, and were very savage, they certainly used in the
sense of Ratcliffe Highway. The worst of all this is not so much the immediate
evil, which a severe example* will probably check for the present, as that the
formation and existence of such an association, holding regular meetings and
keeping regular minutes, argues a woful negligence in the masters of these
boys, the tradesmen and citizens of Edinburgh, of that wholesome domestic
discipline which they ought, in justice to God and to man, to exercise over the
youth intrusted to their charge; a negligence which cannot fail to be
productive of every sort of vice, crime, and folly, among boys of that age.
“Yesterday I had the melancholy task of attending
the funeral of the good old Duke of
Buccleuch. It was, by his own direction, very private; but
scarce a
* Three of these lads, all under eighteen years of
age, were executed on the scene of one of the murders here alluded to,
April the 22d, 1812. Their youth and penitence excited the deepest
compassion; but never certainly was a severe example more necessary.
|
392 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
dry eye among the assistants—a rare tribute to a person
whose high rank and large possessions removed him so far out of the social
sphere of private friendship. But the Duke’s mind was moulded upon the
kindliest and most single-hearted model, and arrested the affections of all who
had any connexion with him. He is truly a great loss to Scotland, and will be
long missed and lamented, though the successor to his rank is heir also to his
generous spirit and affections. He was my kind friend. Ever yours,
The next of his letters to Joanna
Baillie is curious, as giving his first impressions on reading Childe Harold. It contains also a striking
sketch of the feelings he throughout life expressed, as to what he had observed of society
in London with a not less characteristic display of some of his own minor amusements.
To Miss Joanna Baillie.
“Ashestiel, April 4th, 1812.
“I ought not, even in modern gratitude, which may be
moved by the gift of a purse, much less in minstrel sympathy, which values it
more as your work than if it were stuffed with guineas, to have delayed
thanking you, my kind friend, for such an elegant and acceptable token of your
regard. My kindest and best thanks also attend the young lady who would not
permit the purse to travel untenanted.* I shall be truly glad when I can offer
them in person, but of that there is no speedy prospect. I don’t believe
I shall see London this great while again, which I do not very much regret,
were it
| LETTERS TO MISS BAILLIE—1812. | 393 |
not that it postpones
the pleasure of seeing you and about half-a-dozen other friends. Without having
any of the cant of loving retirement, and solitude, and rural pleasures, and so
forth, I really have no great pleasure in the general society of London; I have
never been there long enough to attempt any thing like living in my own way,
and the immense length of the streets separates the objects you are interested
in so widely from each other, that three parts of your time are past in
endeavouring to dispose of the fourth to some advantage. At Edinburgh, although
in general society we are absolute mimics of London, and imitate them equally
in late hours, and in the strange precipitation with which we hurry from one
place to another, in search of the society which we never sit still to enjoy,
yet still people may manage their own parties and motions their own way. But
all this is limited to my own particular circumstances,—for in a city like
London, the constant resident has beyond all other places the power of
conducting himself exactly as he likes. Whether this is entirely to be wished
or not may indeed be doubted. I have seldom felt myself so fastidious about
books, as in the midst of a large library, where one is naturally tempted to
imitate the egregious epicure who condescended to take only one bite out of the
sunny side of a peach. I suspect something of scarcity is necessary to make you
devour the intellectual banquet with a good relish and digestion, as we know to
be the case with respect to corporeal sustenance. But to quit all this egotism,
which is as little as possible to the purpose, you must be informed that
Erskine has enshrined your letter
among his household papers of the most precious kind. Among your thousand
admirers you have not a warmer or more kindly heart; he tells me
Jeffrey talks very favourably of this volume.
I should be glad, for
394 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
his own sake, that he took some
opportunity to retrace the paths of his criticism; but after pledging himself
so deeply as he has done, I doubt much his giving way even unto conviction. As
to my own share, I am labouring sure enough, but I have not yet got on the
right path where I can satisfy myself I shall go on with courage, for
diffidence does not easily beset me, and the public, still more than the
ladies, ‘stoop to the forward and the bold;’ but then in
either case, I fancy, the suitor for favour must be buoyed up by some sense of
deserving it, whether real or supposed. The celebrated apology of
Dryden for a passage which he could not
defend, ‘that he knew when he wrote it, it was bad enough to
succeed,’ was, with all deference to his memory, certainly
invented to justify the fact after it was committed.
“Have you seen the Pilgrimage of Childe Harold, by Lord Byron? It
is, I think, a very clever poem, bat gives no good symptom of the
writer’s heart or morals; his hero, notwithstanding the affected
antiquity of the style in some parts, is a modern man of fashion and fortune,
worn out and satiated with the pursuits of dissipation, and although there is a
caution against it in the preface, you cannot for your soul avoid concluding
that the author, as he gives an account of his own travels, is also doing so in
his own character. Now really this is too bad; vice ought to be a little more
modest, and it must require impudence at least equal to the noble Lord’s
other powers, to claim sympathy gravely for the ennui arising from his being
tired of his wassailers and his paramours. There is a monstrous deal of conceit
in it too, for it is informing the inferior part of the world that their little
old-fashioned scruples of limitation are not worthy of his regard, while his
fortune and possessions are such as have put all sorts of gratifications too
much
| LETTER TO MISS BAILLIE—CHILDE HAROLD. | 395 |
in his
power to afford him any pleasure. Yet with all this conceit and assurance there
is much poetical merit in the book, and I wish you would read it.
“I have got Rob
Roy’s gun, a long Spanish-barrelled piece, with his
initials, R. M. C., for Robert Macgregor Campbell, which
latter name he assumed in compliment to the Argyle family, who afforded him a
good deal of private support, because he was a thorn in the side of their old
rival house of Montrose. I have, moreover, a relic of a
more heroic character; it is a sword which was given to the great Marquis of Montrose by Charles I., and appears to have belonged to his father, our
gentle King Jamie. It had been preserved for
a long time at Gartmore, but the present proprietor was selling his library, or
great part of it, and John Ballantyne,
the purchaser, wishing to oblige me, would not conclude a bargain, which the
gentleman’s necessity made him anxious about, till he flung the sword
into the scale; it is, independent of its other merits, a most beautiful blade.
I think a dialogue between this same sword and Rob
Roy’s gun, might be composed with good effect.
“We are here in a most extraordinary
pickle—considering that we have just entered upon April, when according to the
poet, ‘primroses paint the gay plain,’ instead of which both
hill and valley are doing penance in a sheet of snow of very respectable depth.
Mail-coaches have been stopt—shepherds, I grieve to say, lost in the snow; in
short, we experience all the hardships of a January storm at this late period
of the spring; the snow has been near a fortnight, and if it departs with dry
weather, we may do well enough, but if wet weather should ensue, the wheat crop
through Scotland will be totally lost. My thoughts are anxiously turned to the
Peninsula, though I think the Spaniards have
396 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
but one
choice, and that is to choose
Lord
Wellington dictator; I have no doubt he could put things right
yet. As for domestic politics, I really give them very little consideration.
Your friends, the Whigs, are angry enough, I suppose, with the
Prince Regent, but those who were most apt to
flatter his follies, have little reason to complain of the usage they have met
with—and he may probably think that those who were true to the father in his
hour of calamity, may have the best title to the confidence of the son. The
excellent private character of the
old King
gave him great advantages as the head of a free government. I fear the Prince
will long experience the inconveniences of not having attended to his own.
Mrs Siddons, as fame reports, has
taken another engagement at Covent Garden: surely she is wrong; she should have
no twilight, but set in the full possession of her powers.*
“I hope Campbell’s plan of lectures will answer.† I think
the brogue may be got over, if he will not trouble himself by attempting to
correct it, but read with fire and feeling; he is an animated reciter, but I
never heard him read.
“I have a great mind, before sealing this long
scrawl, to send you a list of the contents of the purse as they at present
stand,
“1st. Miss Elizabeth
Baillie’s purse-penny, called by the learned a denarius of
the Empress Faustina.
“2d. A gold brooch, found in a bog in Ireland,
* Mrs Siddons
made a farewell appearance at Covent Garden, as Lady Macbeth, on the 29th of June, 1812;
but she afterwards resumed her profession for short intervals more than
once, and did not finally bid adieu to the stage until the 9th of June,
1819. † Mr Thomas
Campbell had announced his first course of lectures on
English Poetry about this time. |
| LETTER TO MISS BAILLIE—APRIL, 1812. | 397 |
which, for aught
I know, fastened the mantle of an Irish Princess in the days of
Cuthullin, or Neal of the nine
hostages.
“3d. A toadstone—a celebrated amulet, which was
never lent to any one unless upon a bond for a thousand merks for its being
safely restored. It was sovereign for protecting new born children and their
mothers from the power of the fairies, and has been repeatedly borrowed from my
mother, on account of this virtue.
“4th. A coin of Edward
I., found in Dryburgh Abbey.
“5th. A funeral ring, with Dean Swift’s hair.
“So you see my nicknackatory is well supplied,
though the purse is more valuable than all its contents.
“Adieu, my dear friend, Mrs
Scott joins in kind respects to your sister, the Doctor, and
Mrs Baillie,
A month later, the Edinburgh Review on Lord
Byron’s Romaunt
having just appeared, Scott says to Mr Morritt (May 12), “I agree very much in what
you say of Childe Harold. Though there is something provoking
and insulting to morality and to feeling in his misanthropical ennui, it gives,
nevertheless, an odd piquancy to his descriptions and reflections. This is upon the
whole a piece of most extraordinary power, and may rank its author with our first
poets. I see the Edinburgh Review has
hauled its wind.”
Lord Byron was, I need not say, the prime object of
interest this season in the fashionable world of London; nor did the Prince Regent owe the subsequent hostilities of the noble Poet
to any neglect on his part of the brilliant genius which had just been fully revealed in
the Childe Harold. Mr Murray, the publisher of the Romaunt, on hearing, on
the 29th of June, Lord Byron’s
398 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
account of his introduction to his Royal Highness, conceived that, by
communicating it to Scott, he might afford the
opportunity of such a personal explanation between his two poetical friends, as should
obliterate on both sides whatever painful feelings had survived the offensive allusions to
Marmion in the English Bards and Scotch Reviewers; and this good-natured
step had the desired consequences. Mr Moore says
that the correspondence “begun in some enquiries which Mr Scott
addressed to Lord Byron on the subject of his interview with
Royalty;”* but he would not have used that expression, had he seen the following
letter:—
To the Right Honourable Lord Byron, &c. &c.
Care of John Murray, Esq., Fleet Street, London.
“Edinburgh, July 3d, 1812.
“My Lord,
“I am uncertain if I ought to profit by the apology
which is afforded me, by a very obliging communication from our acquaintance,
John Murray of Fleet Street, to give
your Lordship the present trouble. But my intrusion concerns a large debt of
gratitude due to your Lordship, and a much less important, one of explanation,
which I think I owe to myself, as I dislike standing low in the opinion of any
person whose talents rank so highly in my own, as your Lordship’s most
deservedly do.
“The first count, as our
technical language expresses it, relates to the high pleasure I have received
from the Pilgrimage of Childe
Harold, and from its precursors; the former, with all its classical
associations, some of which are lost on so poor a scholar as I am, possesses
the additional charm of vivid and animated description, mingled with original
sentiment;—
| LETTER TO LORD BYRON—JULY, 1812. | 399 |
but besides this
debt, which I owe your Lordship in common with the rest of the reading public,
I have to acknowledge my particular thanks for your having distinguished by
praise, in the work which your Lordship rather dedicated in general to satire,
some of my own literary attempts. And this leads me to put your Lordship right
in the circumstances respecting the sale of
Marmion, which had reached you in a distorted
and misrepresented form, and which, perhaps, I have some reason to complain,
were given to the public without more particular enquiry. The poem, my Lord,
was not written upon contract for a sum of money—though it is too true that it
was sold and published in a very unfinished state, which I have since
regretted, to enable me to extricate myself from some engagements which fell
suddenly upon me, by the unexpected misfortunes of a very near relation. So
that, to quote statute and precedent, I really come under the case cited by
Juvenal, though not quite in the
extremity of the classic author—
Esurit, intactam Paridi nisi vendit Agaven. |
And so much for a mistake, into which your Lordship might easily fall,
especially as I generally find it the easiest way of stopping sentimental
compliments on the beauty, &c., of certain poetry, and the delights which
the author must have taken in the composition, by assigning the readiest reason
that will cut the discourse short, upon a subject where one must appear either
conceited, or affectedly rude and cynical.
“As for my attachment to literature, I sacrificed
for the pleasure of pursuing it very fair chances of opulence and professional
honours, at a time of life when I fully knew their value, and I am not ashamed
to say, that in deriving advantages in compensation from the partial
400 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
favour of the public, I have added some comforts and
elegancies to a bare independence. I am sure your Lordship’s good sense
will easily put this unimportant egotism to the right account,—for though I do
not know the motive would make me enter into controversy with a fair or an
unfair literary critic—I may be well excused for a wish
to clear my personal character from any tinge of mercenary or sordid feeling in
the eyes of a contemporary of genius. Your Lordship will likewise permit me to
add, that you would have escaped the trouble of this explanation, had I not
understood that the satire alluded to had been suppressed, not to be reprinted.
For in removing a prejudice on your Lordship’s own mind, I had no
intention of making any appeal by or through you to the public, since my own
habits of life have rendered my defence as to avarice or rapacity rather too
easy.
“Leaving this foolish matter where it lies, I have
to request your Lordship’s acceptance of my best thanks for the
flattering communication which you took the trouble to make Mr Murray on my behalf, and which could not
fail to give me the gratification, which I am sure you intended. I dare say our
worthy bibliopolist overcoloured his report of your Lordship’s
conversation with the Prince Regent, but I
owe my thanks to him nevertheless, for the excuse he has given me for intruding
these pages on your Lordship. Wishing you health, spirit, and perseverance, to
continue your pilgrimage through the interesting countries which you have still
to pass with Childe Harold, I
have the honour to be, my Lord, your Lordship’s obedient servant,
“P.S. Will your Lordship permit me a verbal
criticism on Childe Harold,
were it only to show I have read his Pilgrimage with attention?
‘Nuestra Dama de la Pena’
means, I suspect, not our Lady of Crime or
| CORRESPONDENCE WITH LORD BYRON. | 401 |
Punishment, but our Lady of the
Cliff; the difference is, I believe, merely in the accentuation of
‘peña.’”
Lord Byron’s answer was in these terms:—
To Walter Scott, Esq. Edinburgh.
“St James’s Street, July 6, 1812.
“Sir,
“I have just been honoured with your letter.—I feel
sorry that you should have thought it worth while to notice the evil works of
my nonage, as the thing is suppressed voluntarily, and
your explanation is too kind not to give me pain. The Satire was written when I was very young and
very angry, and fully bent on displaying my wrath and my wit, and now I am
haunted by the ghosts of my wholesale assertions. I cannot sufficiently thank
you for your praise; and now, waiving myself, let me talk to you of the
Prince Regent. He ordered me to be
presented to him at a ball: and after some sayings, peculiarly pleasing from
royal lips, as to my own attempts, he talked to me of you and your
immortalities; he preferred you to every bard past and present, and asked which
of your works pleased me most. It was a difficult question. I answered, I
thought the Lay. He said his own
opinion was nearly similar. In speaking of the others, I told him that I
thought you more particularly the poet of Princes, as
they never appeared more fascinating than in Marmion and the Lady of the Lake. He was pleased to
coincide, and to dwell on the description of your Jameses as no less royal than
poetical. He spoke alternately of Homer and
yourself, and seemed well acquainted with both; so that (with the exception of
the Turks and your humble servant) you were in very good company. I defy
Murray to have exaggerated his
402 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
Royal Highness’s opinion of your powers, nor can I
pretend to enumerate all he said on the subject; but it may give you pleasure
to hear that it was conveyed in language which would only suffer by my
attempting to transcribe it; and with a tone and taste which gave me a very
high idea of his abilities and accomplishments, which I had hitherto considered
as confined to
manners, certainly superior to those of
any living
gentleman.
“This interview was accidental. I never went to the
levee; for having seen the courts of Mussulman and Catholic sovereigns, my
curiosity was sufficiently allayed: and my politics being as perverse as my
rhymes, I had, in fact, no business there. To be thus praised by your Sovereign
must be gratifying to you; and if that gratification is not alloyed by the
communication being made through me, the bearer of it will consider himself
very fortunately, and sincerely, your obliged and obedient servant,
“P.S.—Excuse this scrawl, scratched in a great
hurry, and just after a journey.”
Scott immediately replied as follows:—
To the Right Hon. Lord Byron, &c. &c. &c.
“Abbotsford near Melrose, 16th July, 1812.
“My Lord,
“I am much indebted to your Lordship for your kind
and friendly letter: and much gratified by the Prince
Regent’s good opinion of my literary attempts. I know so
little of courts or princes, that any success I may have had in hitting off the
Stuarts is, I am afraid, owing to a little old Jacobite leaven which I sucked
in with the numerous traditionary tales that amused my infancy. It is a
fortunate thing for the Prince himself that he has
| CORRESPONDENCE WITH LORD BYRON. | 403 |
a literary turn, since nothing can so
effectually relieve the ennui of state, and the anxieties of power.
“I hope your Lordship intends to give us more of
Childe Harold. I was
delighted that my friend Jeffrey—for
such, in despite of many a feud, literary and political, I always esteem
him—has made so handsomely the amende
honorable for not having discovered in the bud the merits of
the flower; and I am happy to understand that the retractation so handsomely
made was received with equal liberality. These circumstances may perhaps some
day lead you to revisit Scotland, which has a maternal claim upon you, and I
need not say what pleasure I should have in returning my personal thanks for
the honour you have done me. I am labouring here to contradict an old proverb,
and make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear, namely, to convert a bare haugh and brae, of about 100
acres, into a comfortable farm. Now, although I am living in a gardener’s
hut, and although the adjacent ruins of Melrose have little to tempt one who
has seen those of Athens, yet, should you take a tour which is so fashionable
at this season, I should be very happy to have an opportunity of introducing
you to any thing remarkable in my fatherland. My neighbour, Lord Somerville, would, I am sure, readily
supply the accommodations which I want, unless you prefer a couch in a closet,
which is the utmost hospitality I have at present to offer. The fair, or shall
I say the sage, Apreece that was, Lady Davy that is, is soon to show us how much
science she leads captive in Sir
Humphrey; so your Lordship sees, as the citizen’s wife says in
the farce—‘Threadneedle Street has some charms,’ since they
procure us such celebrated visitants. As for me, I would rather cross-question
your Lordship about the outside of Parnassus, than learn the nature of the
contents of all the other mountains in the world. Pray,
404 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
when under ‘its cloudy canopy’ did you hear any thing of the
celebrated Pegasus? Some say he has been brought off with other curiosities to
Britain, and now covers at Tattersal’s. I would fain have a cross from
him out of my little moss-trooper’s Galloway, and I think your Lordship
can tell me how to set about it, as I recognise his true paces in the
high-mettled description of
Ali
Pacha’s military court.
“A wise man said—or, if not, I, who am no wise man,
now say, that there is no surer mark of regard than when your correspondent
ventures to write nonsense to you. Having, therefore, like Dogberry, bestowed all my tediousness upon your
Lordship, you are to conclude that I have given you a convincing proof that I
am very much your Lordship’s obliged and very faithful servant,
From this time the epistolary intercourse between Scott and Byron continued
to be kept up; and it erelong assumed a tone of friendly confidence equally honourable to
both these great competitors, without rivalry, for the favour of the literary world.
The date of the letter last quoted immediately preceded that of
Scott’s second meeting with another of the
most illustrious of his contemporaries. He had met Davy at Mr Wordsworth’s when
in the first flush of his celebrity in 1804, and been, as one of his letters states, much
delighted with “the simple and unaffected style of his bearing—the most agreeable
characteristic of high genius.” Sir Humphrey, now at the
summit of his fame, had come by his marriage with Scott’s
accomplished relation, into possession of an ample fortune; and he and his bride were among
the first of the poet’s visitants in the original cabin at Abbotsford.
The following letter is an answer to one in which Mr
| BYRON—DAVY—SOUTHEY—1812. | 405 |
Southey had besought Scott’s good offices in behalf of an application which he thought of
making to be appointed Historiographer Royal, in the room of Mr
Dutens, just dead. It will be seen that both poets regarded with much alarm
the symptoms of popular discontent which appeared in various districts, particularly among
the Luddites, as they were called, of Yorkshire, during the
uncertain condition of public affairs consequent on the assassination of the Prime
Minister, Mr Percival, by Bellingham, in the lobby of the House of Commons, on the
11th of May, 1812; and that Scott had, in his capacity of Sheriff, had
his own share in suppressing the tumults of the only manufacturing town of Selkirkshire.
The last sentence of the letter alludes to a hint dropped in the Edinburgh Review, that the author of the historical
department of the Edinburgh Annual Register,
ought to be called to the bar of the House of Commons, in consequence of the bold language
in which he had criticized the parliamentary hostility of the Whigs to the cause of Spain.
To Robert Southey, Esq., Keswick.
“Edinburgh, 4th June, 1812.
“It is scarcely necessary to say that the instant I
had your letter I wrote to the only friend I have in power, Lord Melville (if indeed he be now in power),
begging him for the sake of his own character, for the remembrance of his
father who wished you sincerely well, and by every other objuration I could
think of, to back your application. All I fear, if administration remain, is
the influence of the clergy, who have a strange disposition to job away among
themselves the rewards of literature. But I fear they are all to
406 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
pieces above stairs, and much owing to rashness and
mismanagement; for if they could not go on without
Canning and
Wellesley, they
certainly should from the beginning have invited them in as companions, and not
mere retainers. On the whole, that cursed compound of madness and villany has
contrived to do his country more mischief at one blow than all her sages and
statesmen will be able to repair perhaps in our day. You are quite right in
apprehending a
Jacquerie; the country is mined below our
feet. Last week, learning that a meeting was to be held among the weavers of
the large manufacturing village of Galashiels, for the purpose of cutting a
man’s web from his loom, I apprehended the ringleaders and disconcerted
the whole project; but in the course of my enquiries, imagine my surprise at
discovering a bundle of letters and printed manifestoes, from which it appeared
that the Manchester Weavers’ Committee corresponds with every
manufacturing town in the South and West of Scotland, and levies a subsidy of
2s. 6d. per man—(an immense sum)—for the ostensible purpose of petitioning
Parliament for redress of grievances, but doubtless to sustain them in their
revolutionary movements. An energetic administration, which had the confidence
of the country, would soon check all this; but it is our misfortune to lose the
pilot when the ship is on the breakers. But it is sickening to think of our
situation.
“I can hardly think there could have been any
serious intention of taking the hint of the Review, and yet liberty has so often been made
the pretext of crushing its own best supporters, that I am always prepared to
expect the most tyrannical proceedings from professed demagogues.
“I am uncertain whether the Chamberlain will be
| LETTER TO MR SOUTHEY—JUNE, 1812. | 407 |
liable to removal—if not I should
hope you may be pretty sure of your object. Believe me ever yours faithfully,
“4th June.—What a different birthday from those
I have seen! It is likely I shall go to Rokeby for a few days this summer;
and if so, I will certainly diverge to spend a day at Keswick.”
Mr Southey’s application was unsuccessful—the
office he wished for having been bestowed, as soon as it fell vacant, on a person certainly
of vastly inferior literary pretensions—the late Rev. J. S.
Clarke, D.D., private librarian to the Regent.
END OF VOLUME SECOND.
EDINBURGH: PRINTED BY BALLANTYNE AND CO., PAUL’S WORK.
Alan, lord of Galloway (d. 1234)
Scottish magnate who controlled lands in England and was buried in Dundrennan
Abbey.
Ali Pasha of Yannina (1740-1822)
Albanian warlord who expanded his territories during the Napoleonic wars but was
eventually suppressed by the Ottoman Turks; he entertained Byron in 1809.
Agnes Baillie (1760-1861)
The daughter of the Scottish cleric James Baillie and elder sister of the poet Joanna
Baillie with whom she lived in Hampstead for many decades.
Joanna Baillie (1762-1851)
Scottish poet and dramatist whose
Plays on the Passions
(1798-1812) were much admired, especially the gothic
De Montfort,
produced at Drury Lane in 1800.
Matthew Baillie (1761-1823)
Physician and brother of Joanna Baillie; as successor to the anatomist William Hunter he
treated the pedal deformities of both Walter Scott and Lord Byron.
Sophia Baillie [née Denman] (1771-1845)
The daughter of the obstetrician Thomas Denman and sister of Lord Denman; in 1791 she
married the physician Matthew Baillie, brother of Joanna Baillie.
John Ballantyne (1774-1821)
Edinburgh publisher and literary agent for Walter Scott; he was the younger brother of
the printer James Ballantyne.
Dervorguilla de Balliol (d. 1290)
The daughter of Alan, lord of Galloway (d. 1234); in 1233 she married John de Balliol (d.
1268), lord of Barnard Castle.
John de Balliol (d. 1268)
English magnate; the founder of Balliol College, he sided with Henry III in the Barons'
War, 1258-65.
John de Balliol, King of Scotland (1248 c.-1314)
The youngest son of John de Balliol (d. 1268); he was king of Scotland (1292-1296) until
compelled to abdicate by Edward I.
Henry Bankes (1757-1834)
Of Kingston Lacy; educated at Westminster and Trinity College, Cambridge, he was Whig MP
for Corfe Castle (1780-1826).
John Bellingham (1770-1812)
The bankrupt tradesman who assassinated the prime minister Spencer Perceval in the House
of Commons 11 May 1812; unrepentant, he was tried and executed within a week. Byron
witnessed his execution.
John Bunyan (1628-1688)
Dissenting preacher and autobiographer; he published
Grace Abounding to
the Chief of Sinners (1666) and
Pilgrim's Progress
(1678).
Thomas Campbell (1777-1844)
Scottish poet and man of letters; author of
The Pleasures of Hope
(1799),
Gertrude of Wyoming (1808) and lyric odes. He edited the
New Monthly Magazine (1821-30).
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
King Charles I of England (1600-1649)
The son of James VI and I; as king of England (1625-1649) he contended with Parliament;
he was revered as a martyr after his execution.
James Stanier Clarke (1765 c.-1834)
Naval chaplain and librarian to the Prince of Wales; author of
Naufragia, or, Historical Memoirs of Shipwrecks, 2 vols (1805) and
The Life of Admiral Lord Nelson, 2 vols (1809); he corresponded with
Jane Austen.
Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658)
English general and statesman; fought with the parliamentary forces at the battles of
Edgehill (1642) and Marston Moor (1644); led expedition to Ireland (1649) and was named
Lord Protector (1653).
Sir Humphry Davy, baronet (1778-1829)
English chemist and physicist, inventor of the safety lamp; in Bristol he knew Cottle,
Wordsworth, Coleridge, and Southey; he was president of the Royal Society (1820).
Lady Jane Davy [née Kerr] (1780-1855)
Society hostess who in 1798 married Shuckburgh Ashby Apreece (d. 1807) and Humphry Davy
in 1812.
John Dryden (1631-1700)
English poet laureate, dramatist, and critic; author of
Of Dramatick
Poesie (1667),
Absalom and Achitophel (1681),
Alexander's Feast; or the Power of Musique (1697),
The Works of Virgil translated into English Verse (1697), and
Fables (1700).
Louis Dutens (1730-1812)
Huguenot diplomat and writer who edited Leibnitz (6 vols, Geneva, 1768). The author of
Mémoires d'un voyageur qui se repose (1806), he was a book
collector and historiographer to the king.
George Ellis (1753-1815)
English antiquary and critic, editor of
Specimens of Early English
Poets (1790), friend of Walter Scott.
William Erskine, Lord Kinneder (1768-1822)
The son of an episcopal clergyman of the same name, he was a Scottish advocate and a
close friend and literary advisor to Sir Walter Scott.
Jean Froissart (1337 c.-1404 c.)
French courtier and poet; author of
Chronicles (1373-1400).
James Grahame (1765-1811)
Scottish poet; author of the oft-reprinted blank-verse poem,
The
Sabbath (1804). He corresponded with Annabella Milbanke.
Sir James Grant, eighth baronet (1738-1811)
Scottish agricultural improver; he was MP for Elgin and Forres (1861-68) and Banff
(1790-95), and lord-lieutenant of Inverness-shire (1794-1809).
Francis Grose (1731-1791)
English antiquary, Fellow of the Royal Society, author of
Antiquities
of England and Wales (1772-1787),
Classical Dictionary of the
Vulgar Tongue (1785), and
Antiquities of Scotland
(1789-91).
Henry IV, king of England (1366-1413)
Son of John of Gaunt; after usurping the throne from Richard II he was king of England
(1399-1413).
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
David Hume (1711-1776)
Scottish philosopher and historian; author of
Essays Moral and
Political (1741-42),
Enquiry concerning Human Understanding
(1748) and
History of Great Britain (1754-62).
William Hutchinson (1732-1814)
Of Durham, antiquary, playwright, and topographer; he published county histories of
Durham and Cumberland.
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
Juvenal (110 AD fl.)
Roman satirist noted, in contrast to Horace, for his angry manner.
John Leland (1503 c.-1552)
English poet and antiquary; his
Collectanea were published by
Thomas Hearne in 1716.
John Milton (1608-1674)
English poet and controversialist; author of
Comus (1634),
Lycidas (1638),
Areopagitica (1644),
Paradise Lost (1667), and other works.
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
Katherine Morritt [née Stanley] (d. 1815)
The daughter of the Reverend Thomas Stanley, rector of Winwick in Lancashire; in 1803 she
married John Morritt of Rokeby.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
Richard III, king of England (1452-1485)
He assumed the throne after the murder of Edward V. in 1483 and ruled until he was killed
at the battle of Bosworth in 1485.
Sir Thomas Robinson, first baronet (1702 c.-1777)
English architect, architect, connoisseur, MP, governor of Barbados, and friend of Lord
Chesterfield. He sold the family estate at Rokeby in 1769.
Henry Scott, third duke of Buccleuch (1746-1812)
The son of Francis Scott, styled earl of Dalkeith (1721-1750), he succeeded his
grandfather in the dukedom. He was an improver and close friend of Henry Dundas.
John Scott (1769-1816)
Walter Scott's elder brother who served in the 73rd Regiment before retiring to Edinburgh
in 1810.
Sir Walter Scott, second baronet (1801-1847)
The elder son and heir of Sir Walter Scott; he was cornet in the 18th Hussars (1816),
captain (1825), lieut.-col. (1839). In the words of Maria Edgeworth, he was
“excessively shy, very handsome, not at all literary.”
Sarah Siddons [née Kemble] (1755-1831)
English tragic actress, sister of John Philip Kemble, famous roles as Desdemona, Lady
Macbeth, and Ophelia. She retired from the stage in 1812.
Sir John Sinclair, first baronet (1754-1835)
Scottish MP, projected the
Statistical Account of Scotland
(1791-1799) and superintended an edition of Ossian (1807).
John Somers, baron Somers (1651-1716)
Whig politician, member of the Kit-Kat Club, friend of Addison, Steele, and Swift; he was
lord chancellor (1697).
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
William Stark (1770-1813)
Glasgow architect employed by Walter Scott for some of the original work at
Abbotsford.
Jonathan Swift (1667-1745)
Dean of St Patrick's, Scriblerian satirist, and author of
Battle of the
Books with
Tale of a Tub (1704),
Drapier
Letters (1724),
Gulliver's Travels (1726), and
A Modest Proposal (1729).
Robert Sym (1752-1845)
Scottish lawyer and uncle of John Wilson; he was the original of the Timothy Tickler
character in
Blackwood's Magazine.
Daniel Terry (1789-1829)
English actor; after a career in provincial theater made his London debut in 1812. A
close friend of Walter Scott, he performed in theatrical adaptations of Scott's
novels.
Sir Henry Vane (1589-1655)
English courtier, MP, and diplomat who joined with the Parliamentary leaders in
1641.
Richard Wellesley, first marquess Wellesley (1760-1842)
The son of Garret Wesley (1735-1781) and elder brother of the Duke of Wellington; he was
Whig MP, Governor-general of Bengal (1797-1805), Foreign Secretary (1809-12), and
Lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1821-28); he was created Marquess Wellesley in 1799.
John Wilson (d. 1796)
Paisley textile manufacturer, the father of the poet and essayist John Wilson.
John Wilson [Christopher North] (1785-1854)
Scottish poet and Tory essayist, the chief writer for the “Noctes Ambrosianae” in
Blackwood's Magazine and professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh
University (1820).
Margaret Wilson [née Sym] (1753-1824)
The daughter of Andrew Sym, merchant, and Grizel Dunlop; she married the Paisley
manufacturer John Wilson and was the mother of the poet and essayist John Wilson; her
brother was Robert Sym, the “Timothey Tickler” of
Blackwood's.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
John Wycliffe (d. 1384)
English religious reformer; condemned as a heretic, he was responsible for the first
translation of the Bible into English.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.