Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Walter Scott to George Ellis, 3 November 1809
“Ashestiel, Nov. 3, 1809.
“I had your letter some time ago, which gave me less
comfort in the present public emergency than your letters usually do. Frankly,
I see great doubts, not to say an impossibility, of Canning’s attaining that rank among the Opposition which
will enable him to command the use of their shoulders to place him where you
cannot be more convinced that I am—he is entitled to stand. The condottieri of the Grenvilles,—for they have no political principles, and
therefore no political party, detached from their immense influence over
individuals—will hardly be seduced from their standard to that of
Canning, by an eloquence which has been exerted upon
them in vain, even when they might have hoped to be gainers by listening to it.
The soi-disant Whigs stick together
like burs. The ragged regiment of Burdett and Folkstone is
under yet stricter discipline, for you may have observed that no lover was ever
so jealous of his mistress as Sir Francis is of his mob
popularity—witness the fate of Paull,
Tierney, even Wardle; in short, of whomsoever presumed to
rival the brazen image whom the mob of Westminster has set up. That either, or
both of these parties, will be delighted with the accession of our
friend’s wisdom and eloquence, cannot for a moment be disputed. That the
Grenvilles, in particular, did he only propose to
himself a slice of the great pudding, would allow him to help himself where the
plums lie thickest, cannot be doubted. But I think it is very doubtful whether
they, closely banded and confident of
262 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
triumph as they at
present are, will accept of a colleague upon terms which would make him a
master; and unless Canning has these, it appears to me
that we (the Republic) should be no better than if he had retained his office
in the present, or rather late, Administration. But how far, in throwing
himself altogether into the arms of Opposition at this crisis,
Canning will injure himself with the large and sound
party who profess Pittism, is, I really think, worthy of
consideration. The influence of his name is at present as great as you or I
could wish it; but those who wish to undermine it want but, according to our
Scottish proverb, ‘a hair to make a tether of.’ I admit his hand is
very difficult to play, and much as I love and admire him, I am most interested
because it is the decided interest of his country, that he should pique,
repique, and capot his antagonists. But you know much of the delicacy of the
game lies in discarding—so I hope he will be in no hurry
on throwing out his cards.
“I am the more anxious on this score, because I feel
an internal conviction that neither Marquis
Wellesley nor Lord Melville
will lend their names to bolster out this rump of an Administration. Symptoms
of this are said to have transpired in Scotland, but in this retirement I
cannot learn upon what authority. Should this prove so, I confess my best
wishes would be realized, because I cannot see how Percival could avoid surrendering at discretion, and taking,
perhaps, a peerage. We should then have an Administration à la Pitt, which is a much better thing than an Opposition,
howsoever conducted or headed, which, like a wave of the sea, forms indeed but
a single body when it is rolling towards the shore, but dashes into foam and
dispersion the instant it reaches its object. Should Canning and the above named noble peers come
to understand each other, joined to all among the present Ministry whom their
na-
| POLITICKS CANNING, ETC.—1809. | 263 |
tive good sense,
and an attachment to good warm places, will lead to hear reason, it does seem
to me that we might form a deeper front to the enemy than we have presented
since the death of Pitt, or rather since the dissolution
of his first Administration. But if this be a dream, as it may very probably
be, I still hope Canning will take his own ground in
Parliament, and hoist his own standard. Sooner or later it must be successful.
So much for politics—about which, after all, my neighbours the black-cocks know about as much as I do.
“I have a great deal to write you about a new poem which I have on the
anvil—also, upon the melancholy death of a favourite greyhound bitch—rest her
body, since I dare not say soul! She was of high blood and excellent promise.
Should any of your sporting friends have a whelp to spare, of a good kind, and
of the female sex, I would be grateful beyond measure, especially if she has
had the distemper. As I have quite laid aside the gun, coursing is my only and
constant amusement, and my valued pair of four-legged champions, Douglas and Percy, wax old
and unfeary. Ever yours truly,
W. S.”
William Pleydell- Bouverie, third earl of Radnor (1779-1869)
Son of the second earl (d. 1828); educated at Brasenose College, Oxford, he was Whig MP
for Downton (1801) and Salisbury (1802-28), and an associate of Sir Francis Burdett and
Samuel Whitbread.
Sir Francis Burdett, fifth baronet (1770-1844)
Whig MP for Westminster (1807-1837) who was imprisoned on political charges in 1810 and
again in 1820; in the 1830s he voted with the Conservatives.
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
Henry Dundas, first viscount Melville (1742-1811)
Scottish politician, president of the board of control (1793-1801), secretary of war
(1794-1801); first lord of the Admiralty (1804-05).
George Ellis (1753-1815)
English antiquary and critic, editor of
Specimens of Early English
Poets (1790), friend of Walter Scott.
William Wyndham Grenville, baron Grenville (1759-1834)
Educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, he was a moderate Whig MP, foreign secretary
(1791-1801), and leader and first lord of the treasury in the “All the Talents” ministry
(1806-1807). He was chancellor of Oxford University (1810).
James Paull (1778-1808)
East India trader who was MP for Newtown (1805) and twice stood unsuccessfully for
Westminster; he died a suicide.
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
George Tierney (1761-1830)
Whig MP and opposition leader whose political pragmatism made him suspect in the eyes of
his party; he fought a bloodless duel with Pitt in 1798. He is the “Friend of Humanity” in
Canning and Frere's “The Needy Knife-Grinder.”
Gwyllym Lloyd Wardle (1762-1833)
Military officer and MP for Okehampton (1807-1811); with the assistance of the courtesan
Mary Anne Clarke he forced the resignation of the Duke of York as commander-in-chief. She
later turned on Wardle, who retired to Italy where he died.
Richard Wellesley, first marquess Wellesley (1760-1842)
The son of Garret Wesley (1735-1781) and elder brother of the Duke of Wellington; he was
Whig MP, Governor-general of Bengal (1797-1805), Foreign Secretary (1809-12), and
Lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1821-28); he was created Marquess Wellesley in 1799.