Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Chapter II 1817
40 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
CHAPTER II.
HAROLD THE DAUNTLESS PUBLISHED—SCOTT ASPIRES
TO BE A BARON OF THE EXCHEQUER—LETTER TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH
CONCERNING POACHERS, ETC.—FIRST ATTACK OF CRAMP IN THE STOMACH—LETTERS TO
MORRITT—TERRY—AND MRS MACLEAN
CLEPHANE—STORY OF THE DOOM OF DEVORGOIL—JOHN
KEMBLE’S RETIREMENT FROM THE STAGE—WILLIAM
LAIDLAW ESTABLISHED AT KAESIDE—NOVEL OF ROB ROY
PROJECTED—LETTER TO SOUTHEY ON THE RELIEF OF THE POOR, ETC.—LETTER TO
LORD MONTAGU ON HOGG’S QUEEN’S WAKE, AND ON THE DEATH OF FRANCES LADY
DOUGLAS.
1817.
Within less than a month, the Black Dwarf and Old Mortality were followed by “Harold the Dauntless, by the author of the Bridal of Triermain.” This poem had been, it appears,
begun several years back; nay, part of it had been actually printed before the appearance
of Childe Harold, though that circumstance
had escaped the author’s remembrance when he penned, in 1830, his Introduction to the
Lord of the Isles; for he there says,
“I am still astonished at my having committed the gross error of selecting the
very name which Lord Byron had made so
famous.” The volume was published by Messrs Constable, and had, in those booksellers’ phrase, “considerable
success.” It has never, however, been placed on a level with Triermain; and though it contains many vigorous pictures, and splendid verses,
and here and there some happy humour,
| HAROLD THE DAUNTLESS PUBLISHED. | 41 |
the confusion and harsh transitions of the fable,
and the dim rudeness of character and manners, seem sufficient to account for this
inferiority in public favour. It is not surprising that the author should have redoubled
his aversion to the notion of any more serious performance in verse. He had seized on an
instrument of wider compass, and which, handled with whatever rapidity, seemed to reveal at
every touch, treasures that had hitherto slept unconsciously within him. He had thrown off
his fetters, and might well go forth rejoicing in the native elasticity of his strength.
It is at least a curious coincidence in literary history, that, as
Cervantes, driven from the stage of Madrid by the
success of Lope de Vega, threw himself into prose
romance, and produced, at the moment when the world considered him as silenced for ever,
the Don Quixote which has outlived
Lope’s two thousand triumphant dramas—so Scott, abandoning verse to Byron, should have rebounded from his fall by the only prose romances which
seem to be classed with the masterpiece of Spanish genius, by the general judgment of
Europe.
I shall insert two letters, in which he announces the publication of
Harold the Dauntless. In the first of
them he also mentions the light and humorous little piece entitled The Sultan of Serendib, or the Search after Happiness,
originally published in a weekly paper, after the fashion of the old Essayists, which about
this time issued from John Ballantyne’s
premises, under the appropriate name of “the Sale-Room.” The paper had slender success; and
though Scott wrote several things for it, none of them,
except this metrical essay, attracted any notice. The
Sale-Room was, in fact, a dull and hopeless concern; and I should
scarcely have thought it worth mentioning, but for the confirmation
42 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
it
lends to my suspicion that Mr John Ballantyne was very unwilling,
after all his warnings, to retire completely from the field of publishing.
To J. S. S. Morritt, Esq. M. P. Rokeby Park.
“Edinburgh, Jan. 30, 1817.
“I hope to send you in a couple of days Harold the Dauntless, which has
not turned out so good as I thought it would have done. I begin to get too old
and stupid, I think, for poetry, and will certainly never again adventure on a
grand scale. For amusement, and to help a little publication that is going on
here, I have spun a doggrel tale called the Search after Happiness, of which I shall send a
copy by post, if it is of a frankable size; if not, I can put it up with the
Dauntless. Among other misfortunes of Harold is his name, but the thing was partly printed
before Childe Harold was in
question.
“My great and good news at present is, that the bog
(that perpetual hobbyhorse) has produced a commodity of most excellent marle,
and promises to be of the very last consequence to my wild ground in the
neighbourhood; for nothing can equal the effect of marle as a top-dressing.
Methinks (in my mind’s eye, Horatio)
I see all the blue-bank, the hinny-lee, and the other provinces of my poor
kingdom, waving with deep ryegrass and clover, like the meadows at Rokeby. In
honest truth, it will do me yeoman’s service.
“My next good tidings are, that Jedediah carries the world before him. Six
thousand have been disposed of, and three thousand more are pressing onward,
which will be worth L.2500 to the worthy pedagogue of Gandercleuch. Some of the
Scotch Whigs, of the right old fanatical leaven, have waxed wroth with
Jedediah—
| LETTER TO MORRITT—JAN. 1817. | 43 |
‘But shall we go mourn for that, my dear? The cold moon shines by night, And when we wander here and there, We then do go most right.’ |
After all, these honest gentlemen are like
Queen Elizabeth in their ideas of portrait-painting. They
require the pictures of their predecessors to be likenesses, and at the same
time demand that they shall be painted without shade, being probably of
opinion, with the virgin majesty of England, that there is no such thing in
nature.
“I presume you will be going almost immediately to
London—at least all our Scotch members are requested to be at their posts, the
meaning of which I cannot pretend to guess. The finances are the only ticklish
matter, but there is, after all, plenty of money in the country, now that our
fever-fit is a little over. In Britain, when there is the least damp upon the
spirits of the public, they are exactly like people in a crowd, who take the
alarm, and shoulder each other to and fro till some dozen or two of the weakest
are borne down and trodden to death; whereas, if they would but have patience
and remain quiet, there would be a safe and speedy end to their embarrassment.
How we want Billie Pitt now to get up and
give the tone to our feelings and opinions!
“As I take up this letter to finish the same, I hear
the Prince Regent has been attacked and
fired at. Since he was not hurt (for I should be sincerely sorry for my fat
friend), I see nothing but good luck to result from this assault. It will make
him a good manageable boy, and, I think, secure you a quiet Session of
Parliament. Adieu, my dear Morritt, God
bless you. Let me know if the gimcracks come safe—I mean the book, &c. Ever
yours,
44 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
To the Lady Louisa Stuart, Gloucester Place,
London.
“Edinburgh, Jan. 31, 1817.
“This accompanies Harold the Dauntless. I
thought once I should have made it something clever, but it turned vapid upon
my imagination; and I finished it at last with hurry and impatience. Nobody
knows, that has not tried the feverish trade of poetry, how much it depends
upon mood and whim: I don’t wonder, that, in dismissing all the other
deities of Paganism, the Muse should have been retained by common consent; for,
in sober reality, writing good verses seems to depend upon something separate
from the volition of the author. I sometimes think my fingers set up for
themselves, independent of my head; for twenty times I have begun a thing on a
certain plan, and never in my life adhered to it (in a work of imagination,
that is) for half an hour together. I would hardly write this sort of
egotistical trash to any one but yourself, yet it is very true for all that.
What my kind correspondent had anticipated on account of Jedediah’s effusions, has actually taken
place; and the author of a very good
life of Knox has, I
understand, made a most energetic attack, upon the score that the old
Covenanters are not treated with decorum. I have not read it, and certainly
never shall. I really think there is nothing in the book that is not very fair
and legitimate subject of raillery; and I own I have my suspicions of that very
susceptible devotion which so readily takes offence: such men should not read
books of amusement; but do they suppose, because they are virtuous, and choose
to be thought outrageously so, ‘there shall be no cakes and
ale?’—‘Ay, by our lady, and ginger shall be hot in the
mouth too.’ As for the consequences to the author, they can only
affect his fortune or his temper—the former, such as it is, has been
| LETTER TO LADY L. STUART. | 45 |
long fixed beyond shot of
these sort of fowlers; and for my temper, I considered always that, by
subjecting myself to the irritability which much greater authors have felt on
occasions of literary dispute, I should be laying in a plentiful stock of
unhappiness for the rest of my life. I therefore make it a rule never to read
the attacks made upon me. I remember being capable of something like this sort
of self-denial at a very early period of life, for I could not be six years
old. I had been put into my bed in the nursery, and two servant girls sat down
by the embers of the fire, to have their own quiet chat, and the one began to
tell a most dismal ghost story, of which I remember the commencement distinctly
at this moment; but perceiving which way the tale was tending, and though
necessarily curious, being at the same time conscious that, if I listened on, I
should be frightened out of my wits for the rest of the night, I had the force
to cover up my head in the bed-clothes, so that I could not hear another word
that was said. The only inconvenience attending a similar prudential line of
conduct in the present case, is, that it may seem like a deficiency of spirit;
but I am not much afraid of that being laid to my charge—my fault in early life
(I hope long since corrected) having lain rather the other way. And so I say,
with mine honest
Prior—
‘Sleep, Philo,
untouch’d, on my peaceable shelf, Nor take it amiss that so little I heed thee; I’ve no malice at thee, and some love for myself— Then why should I answer, since first I must read thee?’ |
“So you are getting finely on in London. I own I am
very glad of it. I am glad the banditti act like banditti, because it will make
men of property look round them in time. This country is very like the toys
which folks buy for children, and which, tumble them about in any way the
urchins will, are always brought
46 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
to their feet again, by
the lead deposited in their extremities. The mass of property has the same
effect on our Constitution, and is a sort of ballast which will always
right the vessel, to use a sailor’s phrase, and
bring it to its due equipoise.
“Ministers have acted most sillily in breaking up the
burgher volunteers in large towns. On the contrary, the service should have
been made coercive. Such men have a moral effect upon the minds of the
populace, besides their actual force, and are so much interested in keeping
good order, that you may always rely on them, especially as a corps, in which
there is necessarily a common spirit of union and confidence. But all this is
nonsense again, quoth my Uncle Toby to
himself.—Adieu, my dear Lady Louisa; my
sincere good wishes always attend you.
W. S.”
Not to disturb the narrative of his literary proceedings, I have deferred
until now the mention of an attempt which Scott made
during the winter of 1816-1817, to exchange his seat at the Clerk’s table for one on
the bench of the Scotch Court of Exchequer. It had often occurred to me, in the most
prosperous years of his life, that such a situation would have suited him better in every
respect than that which he held, and that his never attaining a promotion, which the
Scottish public would have considered so naturally due to his character and services,
reflected little honour on his political allies. But at the period when I was entitled to
hint this to him, he appeared to have made up his mind that the rank of Clerk of Session
was more compatible than that of a Supreme Judge with the habits of a literary man, who was
perpetually publishing, and whose writings were generally of the imaginative order. I had
also witnessed the zeal with which he seconded the
views of more than one of his own friends, when their ambition was directed to the
Exchequer bench. I remained, in short, ignorant that he ever had seriously thought of it
for himself, until the ruin of his worldly fortunes in 1826; nor had I any information that
his wish to obtain it had ever been distinctly stated, until certain letters, one of which
I shall introduce, were placed in my hands after his death, by the present Duke of Buecleuch. The late
Duke’s answers to these letters are also before me; but of them it is
sufficient to say, that, while they show the warmest anxiety to serve
Scott, they refer to private matters, which ultimately rendered it
inconsistent with his Grace’s feelings to interfere at the time in question with the
distribution of Crown patronage. I incline to think, on the whole, that the death of this
nobleman, which soon after left the influence of his house in abeyance, must have, far more
than any other circumstance, determined Scott to renounce all notions
of altering his professional position.
To the Duke of Buccleuch, &c. &c.
“Edinburgh, 11th Dec. 1816.
“My dear Lord Duke,
“Your Grace has been so much my constant and kind
friend and patron through the course of my life, that I trust I need no apology
for thrusting upon your consideration some ulterior views, which have been
suggested to me by my friends, and which I will either endeavour to prosecute,
time and place serving, or lay aside all thoughts of, as they appear to your
Grace feasible, and likely to be forwarded by your patronage. It has been
suggested to me, in a word, that there would be no impropriety in my being put
in nomination as a candidate for the situation of a Baron of Exchequer, when a
vacancy shall take place. The difference of the
48 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
emolument
between that situation and those which I now hold, is just L.400 a-year, so
that, in that point of view, it is not a very great object. But there is a
difference in the rank, and also in the leisure afforded by a Baron’s
situation; and a man may, without condemnation, endeavour, at my period of
life, to obtain as much honour and ease as he can handsomely come by. My
pretensions to such an honour (next to your Grace’s countenancing my
wishes) would rest very much on the circumstance that my nomination would
vacate two good offices (Clerk of Session and Sheriff of Selkirkshire) to the
amount of L.1000 and L.300 a-year; and, besides, would extinguish a pension of
L.300 which I have for life, over and above my salary as Clerk of Session, as
having been in office at the time when the Judicature Act deprived us of a part
of our vested fees and emoluments. The extinction of this pension would be just
so much saved to the public. I am pretty confident also that I should be
personally acceptable to our friend the
Chief
Baron.* But whether all or any of these circumstances will weigh
much in my favour, must solely and entirely rest with your Grace, without whose
countenance it would be folly in me to give the matter a second thought. With
your patronage, both my situation and habits of society may place my hopes as
far as any who are likely to apply; and your interest would be strengthened by
the opportunity of placing some good friend in Selkirkshire, besides converting
the Minstrel of the Clan into a Baron, a transmutation worthy of so powerful
and kind a chief. But if your Grace thinks I ought to drop thoughts of this
preferment, I am bound to say, that I think myself as well provided for
* The late Right Honourable Robert Dundas of Arniston, Chief Baron of
the Scotch Exchequer; one of Scott’s earliest and kindest friends
in that distinguished family. |
| LETTER TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH. | 49 |
by my friends and the
public as I have the least title to expect, and that I am perfectly contented
and grateful for what I have received. Ever your Grace’s faithful and
truly obliged servant,
The following letter, to the same noble friend, contains a slight
allusion to this affair of the Barony; but I insert it for a better reason. The Duke had,
it seems, been much annoyed by some depredations on his game in the district of Ettrick
Water; and more so by the ill use which some boys from Selkirk made of his liberality, in
allowing the people of that town free access to his beautiful walks on the banks of the
Yarrow, adjoining Newark and Bowhill. The Duke’s forester, by name Thomas
Hudson, had recommended rigorous measures with reference to both these
classes of offenders, and the Sheriff was of course called into council:
To His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch, &c. &c. &c.
“Abbotsford, January 11, 1817.
“My dear Lord Duke,
“I have been thinking anxiously about the
disagreeable affair of Tom Hudson, and the impudent
ingratitude of the Selkirk rising generation, and I will take the usual liberty
your friendship permits me, of saying what occurs to me on each subject.
Respecting the shooting, the crime is highly punishable, and we will omit no
enquiries to discover the individuals guilty. Charles Erskine, who is a good police officer, will be
sufficiently active. I know my friend and kinsman, Mr
Scott of Harden, feels very anxious to oblige your Grace, and I
have little doubt that if you will have the goodness to mention to him this
unpleasant circumstance, he would be anxious to put his game under such
regula-
50 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
tions as should be agreeable to you. But I
believe the pride and pleasure he would feel in obliging your Grace, as heading
one of the most ancient and most respectable branches of your name (if I may be
pardoned for saying so much in our favour), would be certainly much more
gratified by a compliance with your personal request, than if it came through
any other channel. Your Grace knows there are many instances in life in which
the most effectual way of conferring a favour is condescending to accept one. I
have known Harden long and most intimately—a more
respectable man either for feeling, or talent, or knowledge of human life, is
rarely to be met with. But he is rather indecisive—requiring some instant
stimulus in order to make him resolve to do, not only what he knows to be
right, but what he really wishes to do, and means to do one time or other. He
is exactly
Prior’s Earl of Oxford:—
‘Let that be done which Mat doth say’ ‘Yea,’ quoth the Earl, ‘but not
to-day.’ |
And so exit Harden and enter Selkirk.
“I know hardly any thing more exasperating than the
conduct of the little blackguards, and it will be easy to discover and make an
example of the biggest and most insolent. In the mean while, my dear Lord,
pardon my requesting you will take no general or sweeping resolution as to the
Selkirk folks. Your Grace lives near them—your residence, both from your direct
beneficence, and the indirect advantages which they derive from that residence,
is of the utmost consequence; and they must be made sensible that all these
advantages are endangered by the very violent and brutal conduct of their
children. But I think your Grace will be inclined to follow this up only for
the purpose of correction, not for that of requital. They are so much beneath
you, and so much in your power, that this would be unworthy of you—especially
| LETTER TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH. | 51 |
as all the
inhabitants of the little country town must necessarily be included in the
punishment. Were your Grace really angry with them, and acting accordingly, you
might ultimately feel the regret of my old schoolmaster, who, when he had
knocked me down, apologized by saying he did not know his own strength. After
all, those who look for any thing better than ingratitude from the uneducated
and unreflecting mass of a corrupted population, must always be deceived; and
the better the heart is that has been expanded towards them, their wants, and
their wishes, the deeper is the natural feeling of disappointment. But it is
our duty to fight on, doing what good we can (and surely the disposition and
the means were never more happily united than in your Grace), and trusting to
God Almighty, whose grace ripens the seeds we commit to the earth, that our
benefactions shall bear fruit. And now, my Lord, asking your pardon for this
discharge of my conscience, and assuring your Grace I have no wish to exchange
my worsted gown, or the remote
Pisgah exchange of a silk
one, for the cloak of a presbyterian parson, even with the certainty of
succeeding to the first of your numerous Kirk-presentations, I take the liberty
to add my own opinion. The elder boys must be looked out and punished, and the
parents severely reprimanded, and the whole respectable part of the town made
sensible of the loss they must necessarily sustain by the discontinuance of
your patronage. And at, or about the same time, I should think it proper if
your Grace were to distinguish by any little notice such Selkirk people working
with you as have their families under good order.
“I am taking leave of Abbotsford multum gemens, and have been just giving
directions for planting upon Turnagain, When shall we
eat a cold luncheon there, and look at the view, and root up the monster in his
abyss?
52 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
I assure you, none of your numerous vassals can
show a finer succession of distant prospects. For the homeview—ahem!—We must
wait till the trees grow. Ever your Grace’s truly faithful
While the abortive negotiation as to the Exchequer was still pending,
Scott was visited, for the first time since his
childish years, with a painful illness, which proved the harbinger of a series of attacks,
all nearly of the same kind, continued at short intervals during more than two years.
Various letters, already introduced, have indicated how widely his habits of life when in
Edinburgh differed from those of Abbotsford. They at all times did so to a great extent;
but he had pushed his liberties with a most robust constitution to a perilous extreme while
the affairs of the Ballantynes were labouring, and he was now to pay
the penalty.
The first serious alarm occurred towards the close of a merry dinner
party in Castle Street (on the 5th of March), when Scott
suddenly sustained such exquisite torture from cramp in the stomach, that his masculine
powers of endurance gave way, and he retired from the room with a scream of agony which
electrified his guests. This scene was often repeated, as we shall see presently. His
friends in Edinburgh continued all that spring in great anxiety on his account. Scarcely,
however, had the first symptoms yielded to severe medical treatment, than he is found to
have beguiled the intervals of his suffering by planning a dramatic piece on a story
supplied to him by one of Train’s
communications, which he desired to present to Terry
on behalf of the actor’s first-born son, who had been christened by the name of
Walter Scott Terry.*
* This young gentleman is now an officer in the East India
Company’s army. |
| STORY OF THE BARON OF PLENTON. | 53 |
Such was the origin of “the Fortunes of Devorgoil”—a piece which, though completed
soon afterwards, and submitted by Terry to many
manipulations with a view to the stage, was never received by any manager, and was first
published, towards the close of the author’s life, under the title, slightly altered
for an obvious reason, of “the Doom of
Devorgoil.” The sketch of the story which he gives in the following letter
will probably be considered by many besides myself as well worth the drama. It appears that
the actor had mentioned to Scott his intention of Terryfying “the Black
Dwarf.”
To Daniel Terry, Esq., London.
“Edinburgh, 12th March, 1817.
“I am now able to write to you on your own affairs,
though still as weak as water from the operations of the medical faculty, who,
I think, treated me as a recusant to their authority, and having me once at
advantage, were determined I should not have strength to rebel again in a
hurry. After all, I believe it was touch and go; and considering how much I
have to do for my own family and others, my elegy might have been that of the
Auld Man’s Mare—
‘The peats and turf are all to lead, What ail’d the beast to die?’ |
You don’t mention the nature of your undertaking in your last, and
in your former you spoke both of the
Black Dwarf and of
Triermain. I have some doubts whether the town will endure a second
time the following up a well-known tale with a dramatic representation—and
there is no
vis comica to redeem the
Black Dwarf, as in the case of
Dominie Sampson. I have thought of two
subjects for you, if, like the Archbishop’s homilies, they do not smell
of the apoplexy. The first is a noble and very dra-
54 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
matic
tradition preserved in Galloway, which runs briefly thus:—The Barons of Plenton
(the family name, I think, was——by Jupiter, forgot!) boasted of great
antiquity, and formerly of extensive power and wealth, to which the ruins of
their huge castle, situated on an inland loch, still bear witness. In the
middle of the seventeenth century, it is said, these ruins were still inhabited
by the lineal descendant of this powerful family. But the ruinous halls and
towers of his ancestors were all that had descended to him, and he cultivated
the garden of the castle, and sold its fruits for a subsistence. He married in
a line suitable rather to his present situation than the dignity of his
descent, and was quite sunk into the rank of peasantry, excepting that he was
still called—more in mockery, or at least in familiarity, than in respect—the
Baron of Plenton. A causeway connected the castle with the mainland; it was cut
in the middle, and the moat only passable by a drawbridge which yet subsisted,
and which the poor old couple contrived to raise every night by their joint
efforts, the country being very unsettled at the time. It must be observed,
that the old man and his wife occupied only one apartment in the extensive
ruins, a small one adjoining to the drawbridge; the rest was waste and
dilapidated. As they were about to retire one night to rest, they were deterred
by a sudden storm, which, rising in the wildest manner possible, threatened to
bury them under the ruins of the castle. While they listened in terror to the
complicated sounds of thunder, wind, and rain, they were astonished to hear the
clang of hoofs on the causeway, and the voices of people clamouring for
admittance. This was a request not rashly to be granted. The couple looked out,
and dimly discerned through the storm that the causeway was crowded with
riders. ‘How many of you are there?’ demanded John.—‘Not more than the hall will
hold,’ was the
answer; ‘but open the gate, lower the bridge, and do not keep the
ladies in the rain.’
John’s heart was melted for the ladies, and,
against his wife’s advice, he undid the bolts, sunk the drawbridge, and
bade them enter in the name of God. Having done so, he instantly retired into
his
sanctum sanctorum to await the
event, for there was something in the voices and language of his guests that
sounded mysterious and awful. They rushed into the castle, and appeared to know
their way through all its recesses. Grooms were heard hurrying their horses to
the stables—sentinels were heard mounting guard—a thousand lights gleamed from
place to place through the ruins, till at length they seemed all concentrated
in the baronial hall, whose range of broad windows threw a resplendent
illumination on the moss-grown court below. After a short time, a domestic,
clad in a rich but very antique dress, appeared before the old couple, and
commanded them to attend his lord and lady in the great hall. They went with
tottering steps, and to their great terror found themselves in the midst of a
most brilliant and joyous company; but the fearful part of it was, that most of
the guests resembled the ancestors of John’s family,
and were known to him by their resemblance to pictures which mouldered in the
castle, or by traditionary description. At the head, the founder of the race,
dressed like some mighty baron, or rather some Galwegian prince, sat with his
lady. There was a difference of opinion between these ghostly personages
concerning our honest John. The chief was inclined to
receive him graciously; the lady considered him, from his mean marriage, as
utterly unworthy of their name and board. The upshot is, that the chief
discovers to his descendant the means of finding a huge treasure concealed in
the castle; the lady assures him that the discovery shall never avail
56 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
him. In the morning no trace can be discovered of the
singular personages who had occupied the hall. But John sought for and
discovered the vault where the spoils of the Southrons were concealed, rolled
away the covering stone, and feasted his eyes on a range of massy chests of
iron, filled doubtless with treasure. As he deliberated on the best means of
bringing them up, and descending into the vault, he observed it began slowly to
fill with water. Baling and pumping were resorted to, and when he had exhausted
his own and his wife’s strength, they summoned the assistance of the
neighbourhood. But the vengeance of the visionary lady was perfect; the waters
of the lake had forced their way into the vault, and John,
after a year or two spent in draining and so forth, died broken-hearted, the
last baron of Plenton.
“Such is the tale, of which the incidents seem new,
and the interest capable of being rendered striking; the story admits of the
highest degree of decoration, both by poetry, music, and scenery, and I propose
(in behalf of my godson) to take some pains in dramatizing it. As thus you
shall play John, as you can speak a little Scotch; I will
make him what the Baron of Bradwardine
would have been in his circumstances, and he shall be alternately ludicrous
from his family pride and prejudices, contrasted with his poverty, and
respectable from his just and independent tone of feeling and character. I
think Scotland is entitled to have something on the stage to balance Macklin’s two worthies.* You understand
the dialect will be only tinged with the national dialect—not that the baron is
to speak broad Scotch, while all the others talk English. His wife and he shall
have one child, a daughter, suitored unto by the conceited young parson or
schoolmaster of
* Sir Archy
Mac-Sarcasm and Sir Pertinax
MacSycophant. |
the village, whose addresses are
countenanced by her mother—and by Halbert the
hunter, a youth of unknown descent. Now this youth shall be the
rightful heir and representative of the English owners of the treasure, of
which they had been robbed by the baron’s ancestors, for which unjust act
their spirits still walked the earth. These, with a substantial character or
two, and the ghostly personages, shall mingle as they may—and the discovery of
the youth’s birth shall break the spell of the treasure-chamber. I will
make the ghosts talk as never ghosts talked in the body or out of it; and the
music may be as unearthly as you can get it. The rush of the shadows into the
castle shall be seen through the window of the baron’s apartment in the
flat scene. The ghosts’ banquet, and many other circumstances, may give
great exercise to the scene-painter and dresser. If you like this plan, you had
better suspend any other for the present. In my opinion it has the infinite
merit of being perfectly new in plot and structure, and I will set about the
sketch as soon as my strength is restored in some measure by air and exercise.
I am sure I can finish it in a fortnight then. Ever yours truly,
About the time when this letter was written, a newspaper paragraph having
excited the apprehension of two—or I should say three—of his dearest friends that his life
was in actual danger, Scott wrote to them as follows—
To John B. S. Morritt, Esq., M.P., Portland Place, London.
“Edinburgh, 20th March, 1817.
“I hasten to acquaint you that I am in the land of
life, and thriving, though I have had a slight shake, and still feel the
consequences of medical treatment. I had
58 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
been plagued all
through this winter with cramps in my stomach, which I endured as a man of
mould might, and endeavoured to combat them by drinking scalding water, and so
forth. As they grew rather unpleasantly frequent, I had reluctant recourse to
Baillie. But before his answer
arrived, on the 5th, I had a most violent attack, which broke up a small party
at my house, and sent me to bed roaring like a bull-calf. All sorts of remedies
were applied, as in the case of Gil
Blas’ pretended colic, but such was the pain of the real
disorder, that it outdeviled the Doctor hollow. Even heated salt, which was
applied in such a state that it burned my shirt to rags, I hardly felt when
clapped to my stomach. At length the symptoms became inflammatory, and
dangerously so, the seat being the diaphragm. They only gave way to very
profuse bleeding and blistering, which, under higher assistance, saved my life.
My recovery was slow and tedious from the state of exhaustion. I could neither
stir for weakness and giddiness, nor read for dazzling in my eyes, nor listen
for a whizzing sound in my ears, nor even think for lack of the power of
arranging my ideas. So I had a comfortless time of it for about a week. Even
yet I by no means feel, as the copy-book hath it,
‘The lion bold, which the lamb doth hold—’ |
on the contrary, I am as weak as water. They tell me (of course) I must
renounce every creature comfort, as my friend Jedediah calls it. As for dinner and so forth, I care little
about it but toast and water, and three glasses of wine, sound like hard laws
to me. However, to parody the lamentation of Hassan,
the camel-driver,
‘The lily health outvies the grape’s bright ray, And life is dearer than the usquebæ—’ |
so I shall be amenable to discipline. But in my own
secret mind I suspect the state of my bowels
more than any thing else. I take enough of exercise and enough of rest; but
unluckily they are like a Lapland year, divided as one night and one day. In
the vacation I never sit down; in the session-time I seldom rise up. But all
this must be better arranged in future; and I trust I shall live to weary out
all your kindness.
“I am obliged to break off hastily. I trust I shall
be able to get over the Fell in the end of summer, which will rejoice me much,
for the sound of the woods of Rokeby is lovely in mine ear. Ever yours,
To Mrs Maclean Clephane, of Torloisk, Mull.
Edinburgh, 23d March, 1817.
“Here comes to let you know you had nearly seen the
last sight of me, unless I had come to visit you on my red beam, like one of
Fingal’s heroes, which, Ossianic
as you are, I trow you would readily dispense with. The cause was a cramp in my
stomach, which, after various painful visits, as if it had been sent by
Prospero, and had mistaken me for
Caliban, at length chose to conclude by
setting fire to its lodging, like the Frenchmen as they retreated through
Russia, and placed me in as proper a state of inflammation as if I had had the
whole Spafields’ committee in my unfortunate stomach. Then bleeding and
blistering was the word; and they bled and blistered till they left me neither
skin nor blood. However, they beat off the foul fiend, and I am bound to praise
the bridge which carried me over. I am still very totterish, and very giddy,
kept to panada, or rather to porridge, for I spurned at all foreign slops, and
adhered to our ancient oatmeal manufacture. But I have no apprehension of any
return of the serious
60 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
part of the malady, and I am now
recovering my strength, though looking somewhat cadaverous upon the occasion.
“I much approve of your going to Italy by sea; indeed
it is the only way you ought to think of it. I am only sorry you are going to
leave us for a while; but indeed the isle of Mull might be Florence to me in
respect of separation, and cannot be quite Florence to you, since Lady Compton is not there. I lately heard her
mentioned in a company where my interest in her was not known, as one of the
very few English ladies now in Italy whom their acquirements, conduct, and mode
of managing time, induce that part of foreign society, whose approbation is
valuable, to consider with high respect and esteem. This I think is very
likely; for, whatever folks say of foreigners, those of good education and high
rank among them, must have a supreme contempt for the frivolous, dissatisfied,
empty, gad-about manners of many of our modern belles. And we may say among
ourselves, that there are few upon whom high accomplishments and information
sit more gracefully.
“John Kemble
is here to take leave, acting over all his great characters, and with all the
spirit of his best years. He played Coriolanus last night (the first time I have ventured out),
fully as well as I ever saw him; and you know what a complete model he is of
the Roman. He has made a great reformation in his habits; given up wine, which
he used to swallow by pailfulls,—and renewed his youth like the eagles. He
seems to me always to play best those characters in which there is a
predominating tinge of some over-mastering passion, or acquired habit of acting
and speaking, colouring the whole man. The patrician pride of Coriolanus, the stoicism of Brutus and Cato, the rapid and hurried ve-
hemence of Hotspur, mark the class of characters I mean. But he fails
where a ready and pliable yielding to the events and passions of life makes
what may be termed a more natural personage. Accordingly I think his Macbeth, Lear, and especially his Richard, inferior in spirit and truth. In
Hamlet the natural fixed melancholy of the
prince places him within Kemble’s range;—yet many
delicate and sudden turns of passion slip through his fingers. He is a lordly
vessel, goodly and magnificent when going large before the wind, but wanting
the facility to go ‘
ready about,’ so that he
is sometimes among the breakers before he can wear ship. Yet we lose in him a
most excellent critic, an accomplished scholar, and one who graced our forlorn
drama with what little it has left of good sense and gentlemanlike feeling. And
so exit he. He made me write some lines to speak when he withdraws, and he has
been here criticising and correcting till he got them quite to his mind, which
has rather tired me. Most truly yours while
On the 29th of March, 1817, John Philip
Kemble, after going through the round of his chief parts, to the delight of
the Edinburgh audience, took his final leave of them as Macbeth, and in the costume of that character delivered a farewell address,
penned for him by Scott.*
* See Poetical
Works, vol. xi. p. 348. Scott’s
Farewell for Kemble first appeared
in “The Sale-Room,” for April
5th, 1817; and in the introductory note, James
Ballantyne says,—“The character fixed upon, with happy
propriety, for Kemble’s closing
scene, was Macbeth. He had laboured under a
severe cold for a few days before, but on the memorable night the physical
annoyance yielded to the energy of his mind. ‘He was,’ he said, in
the Green-room, immediately before the curtain rose, ‘determined to leave
behind him the most perfect specimen of his art which he had ever shown;’
and his success was complete. ‘At the moment of the tyrant’s
death
|
62 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
No one who witnessed that scene, and heard the lines as then recited,
can ever expect to be again interested to the same extent by any thing occurring within the
walls of a theatre; nor was I ever present at any public dinner in all its circumstances
more impressive, than was that which occurred a few days afterwards, when
Kemble’s Scotch friends and admirers assembled round
him—Francis Jeffrey being chairman, Walter Scott and John
Wilson the croupiers.
Shortly before this time Mr William
Laidlaw had met with misfortunes, which rendered it necessary for him to
give up the lease of a farm, on which he had been for some years settled, in Mid-Lothian.
He was now anxiously looking about him for some new establishment, and it occurred to
Scott that it might be mutually advantageous, as
well as agreeable, if his excellent friend would consent to come and occupy a house on his
property, and endeavour, under his guidance, to make such literary exertions as might raise
his income to an amount adequate for his comfort. The prospect of obtaining such a
neighbour was, no doubt, the more welcome to “Abbotsford and Kaeside,” from its
opening at this period of fluctuating health; and Laidlaw, who had for
twenty years loved and revered him, considered the proposal
the curtain fell by the universal acclamation of the audience. The applauses
were vehement and prolonged; they ceased were resumed—rose again—were
reiterated—and again were hushed. In a few minutes the curtain ascended, and
Mr Kemble came forward in the dress
of Macbeth (the audience by a consentaneous
movement rising to receive him), to deliver his farewell.” ...
“Mr Kemble delivered the lines with exquisite
beauty, and with an effect that was evidenced by the tears and sobs of many of
the audience. His own emotions were very conspicuous. When his farewell was
closed he lingered long on the stage, as if unable to retire. The house again
stood up, and cheered him with the waving of hats and long shouts of
applause.” |
with far greater delight than the most
lucrative appointment on any noble domain in the island could have afforded him. Though
possessed of a lively and searching sagacity as to things in general, he had always been as
to his own worldly interests simple as a child. His tastes and habits were all modest; and
when he looked forward to spending the remainder of what had not hitherto been a successful
life, under the shadow of the genius that he had worshipped almost from boyhood, his gentle
heart was all happiness. He surveyed with glistening eyes the humble cottage in which his
friend proposed to lodge him, his wife, and his little ones, and said to himself that he
should write no more sad songs on Forest Flittings.*
Scott’s notes to him at this time afford a truly
charming picture of thoughtful and respectful delicacy on both sides. Mr Laidlaw, for example, appears to have hinted that he
feared his friend, in making the proposal as to the house at Kaeside, might have perhaps in
some degree overlooked the feelings of “Laird Moss,” who, having sold his land
several months before, had as yet continued to occupy his old homestead.
Scott answers:—
To Mr W. Laidlaw.
“Edinburgh, April 5, 1817.
“My dear Sir,
“Nothing can give me more pleasure than the prospect
of your making yourself comfortable at Kaeside till some good thing casts up. I
have not put Mr Moss to
* Mr Laidlaw has not published many verses; but his
song of “Lucy’s
Flitting”—a simple and pathetic picture of a poor
Ettrick maiden’s feelings in leaving a service where she had been
happy—has long been and must ever be a favourite with all who
understand the delicacies of the Scottish dialect, and the manners of
the district in which the scene is laid. |
64 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
any inconvenience, for I only requested an answer, giving
him leave to sit if he had a mind—and of free will he leaves my premises void
and redd at Whitsunday. I suspect the house is not in good order, but we shall
get it brushed up a little. Without affectation I consider myself the obliged
party in this matter—or at any rate it is a mutual benefit, and you shall have
grass for a cow, and so forth—whatever you want. I am sure when you are so near
I shall find some literary labour for you that will make ends meet. Yours, in
haste,
He had before this time made considerable progress in another historical
sketch (that of the year 1815) for the Edinburgh
Annual Register; and the first literary labour which he provided for Laidlaw, appears to have been arranging for the same
volume a set of newspaper articles, usually printed under the head of Chronicle, to which
were appended some little extracts of new books of travels, and the like miscellanies. The
Edinburgh Monthly Magazine, subsequently
known by the name of its projector, Blackwood,
commenced in April of this year; and one of its editors, Mr
Thomas Pringle, being a Teviotdale man and an old acquaintance of
Laidlaw’s, offered to the latter the care of its Chronicle department also,—not perhaps without calculating that, in
case Laidlaw’s connexion with the new journal should become at
all a strict one, Scott would be induced to give it
occasionally the benefit of his own literary assistance. He accordingly did not write—being
unwell at the time—but dictated to Pringle a
collection of anecdotes concerning Scottish
gypsies, which attracted a good deal of notice;* and, I
* These anecdotes were subsequently inserted in the Introduction
to Guy Mannering. |
believe, he also assisted
Laidlaw in drawing up one or more articles on the subject of
Scottish superstitions. But the bookseller and Pringle soon
quarrelled, and, the Magazine assuming, on the retirement of the latter, a high Tory
character, Laidlaw’s Whig feelings induced him to renounce its
alliance; while Scott, having no kindness for
Blackwood personally, and disapproving (though he chuckled over
it) the reckless extravagance of juvenile satire, which, by and by, distinguished his
journal, appears to have easily acquiesced in the propriety of
Laidlaw’s determination. I insert mean time a few notes,
which will show with what care and kindness he watched over
Laidlaw’s operations for the Annual Register.
To Mr Laidlaw, at Kaeside.
Edinburgh, June, 16, 1817.
“Dear Sir,
“I enclose you ‘rare guerdon,’ better
than remuneration,—namely, a cheque for L.25, for the Chronicle part of the
Register. The incidents
selected should have some reference to amusement as well as information, and
may be occasionally abridged in the narration; but, after all, paste and
scissors form your principal materials. You must look out for two or three good
original articles; and, if you would read and take pains to abridge one or two
curious books of travels, I would send out the volumes. Could I once get the
head of the concern fairly round before the wind again, I am sure I could make
it L.100 a-year to you. In the present instance it will be at least L.50. Yours
truly,
W. S.”
66 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
To the Same.
“Edinburgh, July 3, 1817.
“My dear Sir,
“I send you Adam’s and
Riley’s Travels. You will
observe I don’t want a review of the books, or a detail of these
persons’ adventures, but merely a short article expressing the light,
direct or doubtful, which they have thrown on the interior of Africa.
‘Recent Discoveries in Africa,’ will be a proper title. I hope to
find you materially amended, or rather quite stout, when I come out on
Saturday. I am quite well this morning. Yours, in haste,
W. S.
“P.S.—I add Mariner’s Tonga Islands and Campbell’s Voyage. Pray, take great
care of them, as I am a coxcomb about my books, and hate specks or spots.
Take care of yourself, and want for nothing that Abbotsford can
furnish.”
These notes have carried us down to the middle of the year. But I must
now turn to some others which show that before Whitsuntide, when Laidlaw settled at Kaeside, negotiations were on foot
respecting another novel.
To Mr John Ballantyne, Hanover Street,
Edinburgh.
“Abbotsford, Monday. [April, 1817.]
“I have a good subject for a work of fiction
in petto. What do you think Constable would give for a smell of it? You
ran away without taking leave the other morning, or I wished to have spoken to
you about it. I don’t mean a continuation of Jedediah, because there might be some delicacy
in putting that by the
| ROB ROY PROJECTED—MAY, 1817. | 67 |
original publishers. You may write if any thing occurs to you on this subject.
It will not interrupt my History. By the way, I have a great lot of the
Register ready for delivery, and no
man asks for it. I shall want to pay up some cash at Whitsunday, which will
make me draw on my brains. Yours truly,
To the Same.
“Abbotsford, Saturday, May 3, 1817.
“I shall be much obliged to you to come here with
Constable on Monday, as he proposes
a visit, and it will save time. By the way, you must attend that the usual
quantity of stock is included in the arrangement—that is L.600 for 6000 copies.
My sum is L.1700, payable in May a round advance, by’r Lady, but I think
I am entitled to it, considering what I have twined off hitherto on such
occasions.
“I make a point on your coming with Constable, health allowing. Yours truly,
W. S.”
The result of this meeting is indicated in a note scribbled by John Ballantyne at the bottom of the foregoing letter,
before it was seen by his brother the printer.
“Half-past 3 o’clock, Tuesday.
“I am this moment returned from Abbotsford, with
entire and full success. Wish me joy. I shall gain above L.600—Constable taking my share of stock also. The
title is Rob
Roy by the author of
Waverley!!! Keep this letter for me.
68 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
On the same page there is written, in fresher ink, which marks, no
doubt, the time when John pasted it into his
collection of private papers now before me—
”N.B—I did gain above L.1200—J.
B.”
The title of this novel was suggested by Constable, and he told me years afterwards the difficulty he had to get it
adopted by the author. “What!” said he, “Mr Accoucheur, must
you be setting up for Mr Sponsor too?—but let’s hear it.”
Constable said the name of the real hero would be the best
possible name for the book. “Nay,” answered Scott, “never let me have to write up to a name. You well know I
have generally adopted a title that told nothing.”—The bookseller, however,
persevered; and after the trio had dined, these scruples gave way.
On rising from table, according to Constable, they sallied out to the green before the door of the cottage,
and all in the highest spirits enjoyed the fine May evening. John Ballantyne, hopping up and down in his glee, exclaimed, “is
Rob’s gun here, Mr Scott; would you object to my trying the auld barrel
with a few dejoy?” “Nay,
Mr Puff,” said Scott, “it would burst and blow
you to the devil before your time.” “Johnny, my man,” said
Constable, “what the mischief puts drawing at sight into
your head?” Scott laughed heartily at this innuendo; and
then observing that the little man felt somewhat sore, called attention to the notes of a
bird in the adjoining shrubbery. “And by the by,” said he, as they
continued listening, “’tis a long time, Johnny, since
we have had the Cobbler of Kelso.” Mr Puff forthwith jumped up on a mass of
stone, and seating himself in the proper attitude of one working with his awl, began a
favourite interlude, mimicking a certain son of Crispin, at whose stall Scott and he had often
lingered when they were schoolboys, and a
blackbird, the only companion of his cell, that used to sing to him, while he talked and
whistled to it all day long. With this performance Scott was always
delighted: nothing could be richer than the contrast of the bird’s wild sweet notes,
some of which he imitated with wonderful skill, and the accompaniment of the
Cobbler’s hoarse cracked voice, uttering all manner of endearing epithets, which
Johnny multiplied and varied in a style worthy of the Old Women in
Rabelais at the birth of Pantagruel. I often wondered that Matthews, who borrowed so many good things from John
Ballantyne, allowed this Cobbler, which was certainly the masterpiece, to
escape him.
Scott himself had probably exceeded that evening the
three glasses of wine sanctioned by his Sangrados. “I never,” said
Constable, “had found him so disposed to
be communicative about what he meant to do. Though he had had a return of his illness but
the day before, he continued for an hour or more to walk backwards and forwards on the
green, talking and laughing—he told us he was sure he should make a hit in a Glasgow
weaver, whom he would ravel up with Rob; and fairly outshone the Cobbler, in an extempore dialogue
between the bailie and the cateran—something not unlike what the book gives us as passing
in the Glasgow tolbooth.”
Mr Puff might well exult in the “full and entire
success” of this trip to Abbotsford. His friend had made it a sine qua non in the bargain with Constable, that he should have a third share in the
bookseller’s moiety of the copyright and though Johnny had no more trouble about the publishing or selling of Rob Roy than his own Cobbler of Kelso, this
stipulation had secured him a bonus of L.1200, before two years
70 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
passed. Moreover, one must admire his adroitness in persuading
Constable, during their journey back to Edinburgh, to relieve him
of that fraction of his own old stock, with which his unhazardous share in the new bargain
was burdened. Scott’s kindness continued as long
as John Ballantyne lived to provide for him a constant succession of
similar advantages at the same easy rate; and Constable, from
deference to Scott’s wishes, and from his own liking for the
humorous auctioneer, appears to have submitted with hardly a momentary grudge to this heavy
tax on his most important ventures.
The same week Scott received Southey’s celebrated letter to Mr William Smith, M.P. for Norwich. The poet of Keswick had also
forwarded to him somewhat earlier his Pilgrimage to Waterloo, which piece contains a touching allusion to the
affliction the author had recently sustained in the death of a fine boy. Scott’s letter on this occasion was as follows:—
To Robert Southey, Esq., Keswick.
Selkirk, May 9th, 1817.
“I have been a strangely negligent correspondent for
some months past, more especially as I have had you rarely out of my thoughts,
for I think you will hardly doubt of my sincere sympathy in events which have
happened since I have written. I shed sincere tears over the Pilgrimage to Waterloo. But in the
crucible of human life, the purest gold is tried by the strongest heat, and I
can only hope for the continuance of your present family blessings to one so
well formed to enjoy the pure happiness they afford. My health has, of late,
been very indifferent. I was very nearly succumbing under a violent
inflammatory attack, and still feel the effects of the necessary treatment. I
believe
| LETTER TO SOUTHEY—MAY, 1817. | 71 |
they took
one-third of the blood of my system, and blistered in proportion; so that both
my flesh and my blood have been in a wofully reduced state. I got out here some
weeks since, where, by dint of the insensible exercise which one takes in the
country, I feel myself gathering strength daily, but am still obliged to
observe a severe regimen. It was not to croak about myself, however, that I
took up the pen, but to wish you joy of your triumphant
answer to that coarse-minded
William Smith. He deserved all he has got,
and, to say the truth, you do not spare him, and have no cause. His attack
seems to have proceeded from the vulgar insolence of a low mind desirous of
attacking genius at disadvantage. It is the ancient and eternal strife of which
the witch speaks in
Thalaba. Such a man as he feels he has no alliance with such as you,
and his evil instincts lead him to treat as hostile whatever he cannot
comprehend. I met Smith once during his stay in
Edinburgh,* and had, what I seldom have with any one in society, a high quarrel
with him. His mode of travelling had been from one gentleman’s seat to
another, abusing the well-known hospitality of the Highland lairds by taking
possession of their houses, even during their absence, domineering in them when
they were present, and not only eating the dinner of to-day, but requiring that
the dinner of to-morrow should also be made ready and carried forward with him,
to save the expense of inns. All this was no business of mine, but when, in the
middle of a company consisting of those to whom he had owed this hospitality,
he abused the country, of which he knew little—the language, of which he
* Scott’s
meeting with this Mr Smith
occurred at the table of his friend and colleague, Hector Macdonald Buchanan. The
company, except Scott and
Smith, were all, like their hospitable
landlord, Highlanders. |
72 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
knew nothing and the people, who have their faults, but
are a much more harmless, moral, and at the same time high-spirited population
than, I venture to say, he ever lived amongst—I thought it was really too bad,
and so e’en took up the debate, and gave it him over the knuckles as
smartly as I could. Your pamphlet, therefore, fed fat my ancient grudge against
him as well as the modern one, for you cannot doubt that my blood boiled at
reading the report of his speech. Enough of this gentleman, who, I think, will
not walk out of the round in a hurry again, to slander the conduct of
individuals.
“I am at present writing at our head-court of
freeholders—a set of quiet, unpretending, but sound-judging country gentlemen,
and whose opinions may be very well taken as a fair specimen of those men of
sense and honour, who are not likely to be dazzled by literary talent, which
lies out of their beat, and who, therefore, cannot be of partial counsel in the
cause; and I never heard an opinion more generally, and evenwarmly expressed,
than that your triumphant vindication brands Smith as a slanderer in all time coming. I think you may not be
displeased to know this, because what men of keen feelings and literary
pursuits must have felt cannot be unknown to you, and you may not have the same
access to know the impression made upon the general class of society.
“I have to thank you for the continuation of the
History of Brazil one of
your gigantic labours; the fruit of a mind so active, yet so patient of labour.
I am not yet far advanced in the second volume, reserving it usually for my
hour’s amusement in the evening, as children keep their dainties for
bonne bouche: but as far as I
have come, it possesses all the interest of the commencement, though a more
faithless and worthless set
| LETTER TO SOUTHEY—MAY, 1817. | 73 |
than both Dutch and Portuguese I have never read of; and it requires your
knowledge of the springs of human action, and your lively description of
‘hair-breadth ’scapes,’ to make one care whether the hog
bites the dog, or the dog bites the hog. Both nations were in rapid declension
from their short-lived age of heroism, and in the act of experiencing all those
retrograde movements which are the natural consequence of selfishness on the
one hand, and bigotry on the other.
“I am glad to see you are turning your mind to the
state of the poor. Should you enter into details on the subject of the best
mode of assisting them, I would be happy to tell you the few observations I
have made—not on a very small scale neither, considering my fortune, for I have
kept about thirty of the labourers in my neighbourhood in constant employment
this winter. This I do not call charity, because they executed some extensive
plantations and other works, which I could never have got done so cheaply, and
which I always intended one day to do. But neither was it altogether selfish on
my part, because I was putting myself to inconvenience in incurring the expense
of several years at once, and certainly would not have done so, but to serve
mine honest neighbours, who were likely to want work but for such exertion.
From my observation, I am inclined greatly to doubt the salutary effect of the
scheme generally adopted in Edinburgh and elsewhere for relieving the poor. At
Edinburgh, they are employed on public works at so much a-day—tenpence, I
believe, or one shilling, with an advance to those who have families. This rate
is fixed below that of ordinary wages, in order that no person may be employed
but those who really cannot find work elsewhere. But it is attended with this
bad effect, that the people regard it partly as charity, which is
humiliating,—and partly as an imposition, in taking their labour below its
usual saleable value; to
74 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
which many add a third view of
the subject—namely, that this sort of half-pay is not given them for the
purpose of working, but to prevent their rising in rebellion. None of these
misconceptions are favourable to hard labour, and the consequence is, that I
never have seen such a set of idle
fainéants as those employed on this system in the
public works, and I am sure that, notwithstanding the very laudable intention
of those who subscribed to form the fund, and the yet more praiseworthy,
because more difficult, exertions of those who superintend it, the issue of the
scheme will occasion full as much mischief as good to the people engaged in it.
Private gentlemen, acting on something like a similar system, may make it
answer better, because they have not the lazy dross of a metropolis to contend
with—because they have fewer hands to manage—and above all, because an
individual always manages his own concerns better than those of the country can
be managed. Yet all who have employed those who were distressed for want of
work at under wages, have had, less or more, similar complaints to make. I
think I have avoided this in my own case, by inviting the country-people to do
piecework by the contract. Two things only are necessary—one is, that the
nature of the work should be such as will admit of its being ascertained, when
finished, to have been substantially executed. All sort of spade-work and
hoe-work, with many other kinds of country labour, fall under this description,
and the employer can hardly be cheated in the execution, if he keeps a
reasonable look out. The other point is to take care that the undertakers, in
their anxiety for employment, do not take the job too cheap. A little
acquaintance with country labour will enable one to regulate this; but it is an
essential point, for if you do not keep them to their bargain, it is making a
jest of the thing, and forfeiting the very advantage you have in view—that,
namely, of inducing
| LETTER TO SOUTHEY—MAY, 1817. | 75 |
the
labourer to bring his heart and spirit to his work. But this he will do where
he has a fair bargain, which is to prove a good or bad one according to his own
exertions. In this case you make the poor man his own friend, for the profits
of his good conduct are all his own. It is astonishing how partial the people
are to this species of contract, and how diligently they labour, acquiring or
maintaining all the while those habits which renders them honourable and useful
members of society. I mention this to you, because the rich, much to their
honour, do not, in general, require to be so much stimulated to benevolence, as
to be directed in the most useful way to exert it.
“I have still a word to say about the poor of our
own parish of Parnassus. I have been applied to by a very worthy friend,
Mr Scott of Sinton, in behalf of an
unfortunate Mr Gilmour, who, it seems,
has expended a little fortune in printing, upon his own account, poems which,
from the sample I saw, seem exactly to answer the description of Dean Swift’s country house—
‘Too bad for a blessing, too good for a curse, I wish from my soul they were better or worse.” |
But you are the dean of our corporation, and, I am informed, take some
interest in this poor gentleman. If you can point out any way in which I can
serve him, I am sure my inclination is not wanting, but it looks like a very
hopeless case. I beg my kindest respects to
Mrs
Southey, and am always sincerely and affectionately yours,
About this time Hogg took
possession of Altrive Lake, and some of his friends in Edinburgh set on foot a subscription
edition of his Queen’s Wake (at a
guinea each copy), in the hope of thus raising a sum adequate to the stocking of the little
farm. The following letter
76 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
alludes to this affair; and also to the
death of Frances Lady Douglas, sister to Duke Henry of Buccleuch, whose early kindness to Scott has been more than once mentioned.
To the Right Honourable Lord Montagu, &c. &c. &c.
“Abbotsford, June 8, 1817.
“My dear Lord,
“I am honoured with your letter, and will not fail
to take care that the Shepherd profits by your kind intentions, and those of
Lady Montagu. This is a scheme which I
did not devise, for I fear it will end in disappointment, but for which I have
done, and will do all I possibly can. There is an old saying of the
seamen’s, ‘every man is not born to be a boatswain,’ and I
think I have heard of men born under a sixpenny planet, and doomed never to be
worth a groat. I fear something of this vile sixpenny influence had gleamed in
at the cottage window when poor Hogg
first came squeaking into the world. All that he made by his original book he
ventured on a flock of sheep to drive into the Highlands to a farm he had taken
there, but of which he could not get possession, so that all the stock was
ruined and sold to disadvantage. Then he tried another farm, which proved too
dear, so that he fairly broke upon it. Then put forth divers publications,
which had little sale and brought him accordingly few pence, though some
praise. Then came this Queen’s
Wake, by which he might and ought to have made from L.100 to
L.200—for there were, I think, three editions—when lo! his bookseller turned
bankrupt, and paid him never a penny. The Duke has now, with his wonted
generosity, given him a cosie bield, and the object of the present attack upon
the public, is to get if possible as much cash together as will stock it. But
no one has loose guineas now to give to poor poets, and I greatly doubt the
scheme succeeding,
| LETTER TO LORD MONTAGU. | 77 |
unless it
is more strongly patronised than can almost be expected. In bookselling
matters, an author must either be the conjuror, who commands the devil, or the
witch who serves him—and few are they whose situation is sufficiently
independent to enable them to assume the higher character—and this is injurious
to the indigent author in every respect, for not only is he obliged to turn his
pen to every various kind of composition, and so to injure himself with the
public by writing hastily, and on subjects unfitted for his genius; but
moreover, those honest gentlemen, the booksellers, from a natural association,
consider the books as of least value, which they find they can get at least
expense of copy-money, and therefore are proportionally careless in pushing the
sale of the work. Whereas a good round sum out of their purse, like a moderate
rise of rent on a farm, raises the work thus acquired in their own eyes, and
serves as a spur to make them clear away every channel, by which they can
discharge their quires upon the public. So much for bookselling, the most
ticklish and unsafe, and hazardous of all professions, scarcely with the
exception of horse-jockeyship.
“You cannot doubt the sincere interest I take in
Lady Montagu’s health. I was very
glad to learn from the Duke, that the late
melancholy event had produced no permanent effect on her constitution, as I
know how much her heart must have suffered.* I saw our regretted friend for the last time at the Theatre, and
made many schemes to be at Bothwell this next July. But thus the world glides
from us, and those we most love and honour are withdrawn from the stage before
us. I know not why it was that among the few for whom I had so much respectful
regard, I never had associated
78 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
the idea of early deprivation with Lady
Douglas. Her excellent sense, deep information, and the wit
which she wielded with so much good humour, were allied apparently to a healthy
constitution which might have permitted us to enjoy, and be instructed by her
society for many years.
Dis aliter
visum, and the recollection dwelling on all the delight
which she afforded to society, and the good which she did in private life, is
what now remains to us of her wit, wisdom, and benevolence. The Duke keeps his
usual health, with always just so much of the gout, however, as would make me
wish that he had more a kind wish for which I do not observe that he is
sufficiently grateful. I hope to spend a few days at Drumlanrig Castle, when
that ancient mansion shall have so far limited its courtesy as to stand covered
in the presence of the wind and rain, which I believe is not yet the case. I am
no friend to ceremony, and like a house as well when it does not carry its roof
en chapeau bras. I heartily
wish your Lordship joy of the new mansion at Ditton, and hope my good stars
will permit me to pay my respects there one day. The discovery of the niches
certainly bodes good luck to the house of Montagu, and as
there are three of them, I presume it is to come threefold. From the care with
which they were concealed, I presume they had been closed in the days of
Cromwell, or a little before, and
that the artist employed (like the General, who told his soldiers to fight
bravely against the Pope, since they were Venetians before they were
Christians) had more professional than religious zeal, and did not even,
according to the practice of the time, think it necessary to sweep away Popery
with the besom of destruction.* I am here on
* Lord
Montagu’s house at Ditton Park, near Windsor, had
recently been destroyed by fire and the ruins revealed some niches with
antique candlesticks, &c., belonging to a domestic chapel that had
been converted to other purposes from the time, I believe, of Henry VIII.
|
a stolen visit of two days, and find
my mansion gradually enlarging. Thanks to
Mr
Atkinson (who found out a practical use for our romantic
theory), it promises to make a comfortable station for offering your Lordship
and Lady Montagu a pilgrim’s meal, when you next
visit Melrose Abbey, and that without any risk of your valet (who I recollect
is a substantial person) sticking between the wall of the parlour and the backs
of the chairs placed round the table. This literally befel
Sir Harry Macdougal’s fat butler, who
looked like a ship of the line in the loch at Bowhill, altogether unlike his
master, who could glide wherever a weasel might make his way. Mr
Atkinson has indeed been more attentive than I can express, when
I consider how valuable his time must be.* We are attempting no castellated
conundrums to rival those
Lord Napier used
to have executed in sugar, when he was Commissioner, and no cottage neither,
but an irregular somewhat—like an old English hall, in which your squire of
L.500 a-year used to drink his ale in days of yore.
“I am making considerable plantations (that is
considering), being greatly encouraged by the progress of those I formerly laid
out. Read the veracious Gulliver’s
account of the Windsor Forest of Lilliput, and you will have some idea of the
solemn gloom of my Druid shades.
Your Lordship’s truly faithful
“This is the 8th of June, and not an ash tree in
leaf yet. The country cruelly backward, and whole fields destroyed by the
grub. I dread this next season.”
* Mr Atkinson, of St
John’s Wood, was the architect of Lord
Montagu’s new mansion at Ditton, as well as the artist ultimately
employed, in arranging Scott’s interior at
Abbotsford.
|
William Atkinson (1774-1839)
English architect who worked at Sir Walter Scott's Abbotsford; he published
Views of Picturesque Cottages (1805).
Matthew Baillie (1761-1823)
Physician and brother of Joanna Baillie; as successor to the anatomist William Hunter he
treated the pedal deformities of both Walter Scott and Lord Byron.
James Ballantyne (1772-1833)
Edinburgh printer in partnership with his younger brother John; the company failed in the
financial collapse of 1826.
John Ballantyne (1774-1821)
Edinburgh publisher and literary agent for Walter Scott; he was the younger brother of
the printer James Ballantyne.
William Blackwood (1776-1834)
Edinburgh bookseller; he began business 1804 and for a time was John Murray's Scottish
agent. He launched
Blackwood's Magazine in 1817.
Hector Macdonald Buchanan of Drumnakiln (d. 1828)
Of Ross Priory, son of Coll Macdonald of Boisdale; he was Writer to the Signet (1791) and
Principal Clerk of Session (1805-1828). He assumed the name of his wife, Jean Buchanan,
whom he married in 1793.
Archibald Campbell (1787-1816 fl.)
Scottish sailor born at Wynford near Glasgow; he published
A Voyage
round the World, from 1806 to 1812 (1816).
Marianne Clephane [née MacLean] (d. 1843)
The daughter of Lachlan Maclean of Torloisk in Mull (d. 1799); in 1790 she married
Major-General William Douglas Clephane (d. 1803). She was a friend of Sir Walter
Scott.
Archibald Constable (1774-1827)
Edinburgh bookseller who published the
Edinburgh Review and works
of Sir Walter Scott; he went bankrupt in 1826.
Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658)
English general and statesman; fought with the parliamentary forces at the battles of
Edgehill (1642) and Marston Moor (1644); led expedition to Ireland (1649) and was named
Lord Protector (1653).
Lady Frances Douglas [née Scott] (1750-1817)
The daughter of Francis Scott, earl of Dalkeith (1721-1750); in 1783 she became the
second wife of Archibald, Lord Douglas. She resided at Bothwell Castle and was the friend
of Sir Walter Scott and other literati.
Lady Lucy Douglas [née Graham] (1751-1780)
The daughter of William Graham, second Duke of Montrose; in 1771 she married Archibald
James Edward Douglas, first Baron Douglas of Douglas
Robert Dundas of Arniston (1758-1819)
The son of Robert Dundas (1713–1787), lord president of the court of session, and nephew
of Henry Dundas, viscount Melville; he was MP for Edinburghshire (1790-1801) and chief
baron of the exchequer in Scotland (1801).
Charles Erskine of Shielfield (1771-1825)
Scottish Writer to the Signet; he was baron balie of Melrose and sheriff-substitute of
Selkirkshire under Walter Scott.
Robert Gilmour (1817 fl.)
Scottish poet; he was Captain in the 1st West India Regiment and published
Lothaire: a Romance, in Six Cantos (1815).
Robert Harley, first earl of Oxford (1661-1724)
English statesman, Queen Anne's Tory leader in Parliament (1711-1714), negotiated the
conclusion to the War of the Spanish Succession (1713).
James Hogg [The Ettrick Shepherd] (1770-1835)
Scottish autodidact, poet, and novelist; author of
The Queen's
Wake (1813) and
Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified
Sinner (1824).
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
John Philip Kemble (1757-1823)
English actor renowned for his Shakespearean roles; he was manager of Drury Lane
(1783-1802) and Covent Garden (1803-1808).
William Laidlaw (1779-1845)
The early friend of James Hogg and Sir Walter Scott's steward and amanuensis.
Charles Macklin (1699 c.-1797)
Irish-born actor and playwright, author of
The Man of the World
(1781).
William Charles Mariner (1791-1853)
English seaman who spent four years living as a Polynesian in Tonga; he was afterwards a
stockbroker.
Charles Mathews (1776-1835)
Comic actor at the Haymarket and Covent Garden theaters; from 1818 he gave a series of
performances under the title of
Mr. Mathews at Home.
Thomas McCrie (1772-1835)
Scottish seceding divine and historian; he was professor of divinity at Edinburgh
(1816-1818) and wrote
Life of John Knox (1812).
Jane Margaret Montagu [née Douglas] (1779-1859)
The daughter of Archibald James Edward Douglas, first Baron Douglas of Douglas; in 1804
she married Henry James Montagu-Scott, second Baron Montagu, son of the third Duke of
Buccleuch.
John Moss (1817 fl.)
Scottish proprietor from whom Walter Scott purchased the farm of Kaeside in 1815.
Francis Napier, eighth Lord Napier (1758-1823)
The son of William, seventh Lord Napier (1730-1775); he fought under Burgoyne in the
American War of Independence and was a Scottish representative peer and lord lieutenant of
Selkirkshire (1797).
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
Thomas Pringle (1789-1834)
Scottish poet, journalist, and abolitionist, who after a brief stint as one of the
founding editors of
Blackwood's Magazine emigrated to southern
Africa.
Matthew Prior (1664-1721)
English poet and statesman successful in both comic and serious verse collected in
Poems on Several Occasions (1718).
Francçois Rabelais (1494 c.-1533)
French physician and satirist; author of
Gargantua and Pantagruel
(1532-34, 1546-52, 1562); the English translation by Urquhart and Motteux (1653, 1693-94)
has been much admired.
James Riley (1777-1840)
American sea captain shipwrecked off the coast of Western Sahara in 1815; he published a
book about his adventures in the Sahara Desert.
Henry Scott, third duke of Buccleuch (1746-1812)
The son of Francis Scott, styled earl of Dalkeith (1721-1750), he succeeded his
grandfather in the dukedom. He was an improver and close friend of Henry Dundas.
John Corse Scott of Sinton (1817 fl.)
Originally Corse; he took the name of Scott from his wife, Catherine Scott of Sinton,
whom he married in 1800. He was an acquaintance of Walter Scott
William Smith (1756-1835)
Educated at the dissenting academy at Daventry, he was a Whig MP for Sudbury (1784-90,
1796-1802), Camelford (1790-96), and Norwich (1802-30), a defender of Joseph Priestley and
follower of Charles Fox. His 1817 speech in Parliament denouncing Robert Southey attracted
much attention.
Edith Southey [née Fricker] (1774-1837)
The daughter of Stephen Fricker, she was the first wife of Robert Southey and the mother
of his children; they married in secret in 1795.
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
Lady Louisa Stuart (1757-1851)
The youngest child of John Stuart, third earl of Bute; she corresponded with Sir Walter
Scott. Several volumes of her writings and memoirs were published after her death.
Jonathan Swift (1667-1745)
Dean of St Patrick's, Scriblerian satirist, and author of
Battle of the
Books with
Tale of a Tub (1704),
Drapier
Letters (1724),
Gulliver's Travels (1726), and
A Modest Proposal (1729).
Daniel Terry (1789-1829)
English actor; after a career in provincial theater made his London debut in 1812. A
close friend of Walter Scott, he performed in theatrical adaptations of Scott's
novels.
Walter Scott Terry (1816-1842)
The son of the actor Daniel Terry; he was a lieutenant in the Bombay Artillery, mortally
wounded fighting at the Khyber Pass. Walter Scott was his godfather.
Joseph Train (1779-1852)
Scottish poet, antiquary, and exciseman patronized by Sir Walter Scott; he contributed
anecdotes to John Gibson Lockhart's biography of Robert Burns.
Lope Félix de Vega Carpio (1562-1635)
Spanish poet and playwright who claimed to have written 1500 plays, of which several
hundred exist.
John Wilson [Christopher North] (1785-1854)
Scottish poet and Tory essayist, the chief writer for the “Noctes Ambrosianae” in
Blackwood's Magazine and professor of moral philosophy at Edinburgh
University (1820).
Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine. (1817-1980). Begun as the
Edinburgh Monthly Magazine,
Blackwood's assumed the name of its proprietor, William Blackwood after the sixth
number. Blackwood was the nominal editor until 1834.
The Sale-Room. (1817). A weekly paper; twenty-eight numbers were published, with contributions by Walter Scott.
Lockhart described it as “a dull and hopeless concern.”