Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Chapter V 1818
144 |
LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
|
CHAPTER V.
MAY, 1818—DINNER AT MR HOME
DRUMMOND’S—SCOTT’S EDINBURGH DEN—DETAILS OF
HIS DOMESTIC LIFE IN CASTLE STREET—HIS SUNDAY DINNERS—HIS EVENING DRIVES, ETC.—HIS CONDUCT
IN THE GENERAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH—DINNERS AT JOHN BALLANTYNE’S
VILLA—AND AT JAMES BALLANTYNE’S IN ST JOHN STREET ON THE
APPEARANCE OF A NEW NOVEL—ANECDOTES OF THE BALLANTYNES, AND OF
CONSTABLE.
On the 12th of May, as we have seen, Scott left Abbotsford, for the summer session in Edinburgh.
At this moment, his position, take it for all in all, was, I am inclined
to believe, what no other man had ever won for himself by the pen alone. His works were the
daily food, not only of his countrymen, but of all educated Europe. His society was courted
by whatever England could show of eminence. Station, power, wealth, beauty, and genius
strove with each other in every demonstration of respect and worship—and, a few political
fanatics and envious poetasters apart, wherever he appeared in town or in country, whoever
had Scotch blood in him, “gentle or simple,” felt it move more rapidly through
his veins when he was in the presence of Scott. To
descend to
what many looked on as higher
things, he considered himself, and was considered by all about him, as rapidly
consolidating a large fortune: the annual profits of his novels alone had, for several
years, been not less than L.10,000: his domains were daily increased his castle was rising
and perhaps few doubted that ere long he might receive from the just favour of his Prince
some distinction in the way of external rank, such as had seldom before been dreamt of as
the possible consequence of a mere literary celebrity. It was about this time that the
compiler of these pages first had the opportunity of observing the plain easy modesty which
had survived the many temptations of such a career; and the kindness of heart pervading, in
all circumstances, his gentle deportment, which made him the rare, perhaps the solitary,
example of a man signally elevated from humble beginnings, and loved more and more by his
earliest friends and connexions, in proportion as he had fixed on himself the homage of the
great, and the wonder of the world.
It was during the sitting of the General Assembly of the Kirk in May
1818, that I first had the honour of meeting him in private society: the party was not a
large one, at the house of a much-valued common friend—Mr Home
Drummond of Blair Drummond, the grandson of Lord
Kames. Mr Scott, ever apt to consider too
favourably the literary efforts of others, and more especially of very young persons,
received me, when I was presented to him, with a cordiality which I had not been prepared
to expect from one filling a station so exalted. This, however, is the same story that
every individual, who ever met him under similar circumstances, has had to tell. When the
ladies retired from the dinner-table I happened to sit next him; and he, having heard that
I had lately returned from a tour in Germany, made that country and its recent literature
146 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
the subject of some conversation. In the course of it, I told him
that when, on reaching the inn at Weimar, I asked the waiter, whether Goethe was then in the town, the man stared as if he had
not heard the name before; and that on my repeating the question, adding Goethe der grosse dichter (the
great poet), he shook his head as doubtfully as before until the landlady solved our
difficulties, by suggesting that perhaps the traveller might mean “the
Herr Geheimer-Rath (Privy-Counsellor)
Von Goethe”
Scott seemed amused with this, and said, “I hope you will
come one of these days and see me at Abbotsford; and when you reach Selkirk or Melrose,
be sure you ask even the landlady for nobody but the
Skeriff.” He appeared particularly interested when I described
Goethe as I first saw him, alighting from a carriage, crammed with
wild plants and herbs which he had picked up in the course of his morning’s
botanizing among the hills above Jena. “I am glad,” said he,
“that my old master has pursuits somewhat akin to my own. I am no botanist,
properly speaking; and though a dweller on the banks of the Tweed, shall never be
knowing about Flora’s beauties;* but how I
should like to have a talk with him about trees!” I mentioned how much any
one must be struck with the majestic beauty of Goethe’s
countenance (the noblest certainly by far that I have ever yet seen)
“Well,” said he, “the grandest demigod I ever saw was Dr Carlyle, minister of Musselburgh, commonly called
Jupiter Carlyle, from having sat
more than once for the king of gods and men to Gavin
Hamilton and a shrewd, clever old carle was he, no doubt, but no more a
poet than his precentor. As * “What beauties does Flora disclose, How sweet are her smiles upon Tweed.” &c. |
|
for poets, I have seen, I believe, all
the best of our own time and country—and, though Burns had the most glorious eyes imaginable, I never thought any of
them would come up to an artist’s notion of the character, except Byron.” A reverend gentleman present, (I think,
Principal Nicoll of St Andrews), expressed his
regret that he had never seen Lord Byron. “And the
prints,” resumed Scott, “give one no impression
of him—the lustre is there, Doctor, but it is not lighted up.
Byron’s countenance is a thing to
dream of. A certain fair lady, whose
name has been too often mentioned in connexion with his, told a friend of mine that,
when she first saw Byron it was in a crowded room, and she did not
know who it was, but her eyes were instantly nailed, and she said to herself that pale face is my fate. And poor soul, if a godlike face and
godlike powers could have made any excuse for devilry, to be sure she had
one.” In the course of this talk, an old friend and schoolfellow of
Scott’s asked him across the table if he had any faith in
the antique busts of Homer? “No,
truly,” he answered, smiling, “for if there had been either limners or
stuccoyers worth their salt in those days, the owner of such a headpiece would never
have had to trail the poke. They would have alimented the honest man decently among
them for a lay-figure.”
A few days after this, I received a communication from the Messrs
Ballantyne, to the effect that Mr
Scott’s various avocations had prevented him from fulfilling his
agreement with them as to the historical department of the Edinburgh Annual Register for 1816, and that it would be
acceptable to him as well as them, if I could undertake to supply it in the course of the
autumn. This proposal was agreed to on my part, and I had consequently occasion to meet him
pretty often during that summer session. He told me that if the war had gone
148 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
on, he should have liked to do the historical summary as before; but
that the prospect of having no events to record but radical riots, and the passing or
rejecting of corn bills and poor bills, sickened him; that his health was no longer what it
had been; and that though he did not mean to give over writing altogether—(here he smiled
significantly, and glanced his eye towards a pile of MS. on the desk by him)—he thought
himself now entitled to write nothing but what would rather be an amusement than a fatigue
to him—“Juniores ad labores”
He at this time occupied as his den a square small
room, behind the dining parlour in Castle Street. It had but a single Venetian window,
opening on a patch of turf not much larger than itself, and the aspect of the place was on
the whole sombrous. The walls were entirely clothed with books; most of them folios and
quartos, and all in that complete state of repair which at a glance reveals a tinge of
bibliomania. A dozen volumes or so, needful for immediate purposes of reference, were
placed close by him on a small movable frame—something like a dumb-waiter. All the rest
were in their proper niches, and wherever a volume had been lent, its room was occupied by
a wooden block of the same size, having a card with the name of the borrower and date of
the loan, tacked on its front. The old bindings had obviously been retouched and regilt in
the most approved manner; the new, when the books were of any mark, were rich but never
gaudy—a large proportion of blue morocco—all stamped with his device
of the portcullis, and its motto clausus tutus
ero—being an anagram of his name in Latin. Every case and shelf was
accurately lettered, and the works arranged systematically; history and biography on one
side—poetry and the drama on another—law books and dictionaries behind his own chair. The
only table was
| LIBRARY IN CASTLE STREET. | 149 |
a massive piece of
furniture which he had had constructed on the model of one at Rokeby; with a desk and all
its appurtenances on either side, that an amanuensis might work opposite to him when he
chose; and with small tiers of drawers, reaching all round to the floor. The top displayed
a goodly array of session papers, and on the desk below were, besides the MS. at which he
was working, sundry parcels of letters, proof-sheets, and so forth, all neatly done up with
red tape. His own writing apparatus was a very handsome old box, richly carved, lined with
crimson velvet, and containing ink-bottles, taper-stand, &c. in silver—the whole in
such order that it might have come from the silversmith’s window half an hour before.
Besides his own huge elbow chair, there were but two others in the room, and one of these
seemed, from its position, to be reserved exclusively for the amanuensis. I observed,
during the first evening I spent with him in this sanctum, that
while he talked, his hands were hardly ever idle. Sometimes he folded
letter-covers—sometimes he twisted paper into matches, performing both tasks with great
mechanical expertness and nicety; and when there was no loose paper fit to be so dealt
with, he snapped his fingers, and the noble Maida aroused
himself from his lair on the hearth-rug, and laid his head across his master’s knees,
to be caressed and fondled. The room had no space for pictures except one, an original
portrait of Claverhouse, which hung over the
chimneypiece, with a Highland target on either side, and broadswords and dirks (each having
its own story), disposed star-fashion round them. A few green tin-boxes, such as solicitors
keep title-deeds in, were piled over each other on one side of the window; and on the top
of these lay a fox’s tail, mounted on an antique silver handle, wherewith, as often
as he had occasion to take down a book, he gently brushed the 150 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
dust
off the upper leaves before opening it. I think I have mentioned all the furniture of the
room except a sort of ladder, low, broad, well-carpeted, and strongly guarded with oaken
rails, by which he helped himself to books from his higher shelves. On the top step of this
convenience, Hinse of Hinsfeldt,—(so called from one of the
German Kinder-märchen)—a venerable tom-cat,
fat and sleek, and no longer very locomotive, usually lay watching the proceedings of his
master and Maida with an air of dignified equanimity; but when
Maida chose to leave the party, he signified his
inclinations by thumping the door with his huge paw, as violently, as ever a fashionable
footman handled a knocker in Grosvenor Square; the Sheriff rose and opened it for him with
courteous alacrity,—and then Hinse came down purring from his
perch, and mounted guard by the foot-stool, vice Maida absent upon furlough.
Whatever discourse might be passing was broken, every now and then, by some affectionate
apostrophe to these four-footed friends. He said they understood every thing he said to
them, and I believe they did understand a great deal of it. But at all events, dogs and
cats, like children, have some infallible tact for discovering at once who is, and who is
not, really fond of their company; and I venture to say, Scott was
never five minutes in any room before the little pets of the family, whether dumb or
lisping, had found out his kindness for all their generation.
I never thought it lawful to keep a journal of what passes in private
society, so that no one need expect from the sequel of this narrative any detailed record
of Scott’s familiar talk. What fragments of it
have happened to adhere to a tolerably retentive memory, and may be put into black and
white without wounding any feelings which my friend, were he alive, would have
| EDINBURGH SOCIETY—1818. | 151 |
wished to spare, I shall introduce as the
occasion suggests or serves; but I disclaim on the threshold any thing more than this; and
I also wish to enter a protest once for all against the general fidelity of several
literary gentlemen who have kindly forwarded to me private lucubrations of theirs, designed
to Boswellize Scott, and which they may
probably publish hereafter. To report conversations fairly, it is a necessary prerequisite
that we should be completely familiar with all the interlocutors, and understand thoroughly
all their minutest relations, and points of common knowledge, and common feeling, with each
other. He who does not, must be perpetually in danger of misinterpreting sportive allusion
into serious statement; and the man who was only recalling, by some jocular phrase or
half-phrase, to an old companion, some trivial reminiscence of their boyhood or youth, may
be represented as expressing, upon some person or incident casually tabled, an opinion
which he had never framed, or if he had, would never have given words to in any mixed
assemblage—not even among what the world calls friends at his own
board. In proportion as a man is witty and humorous, there will always be about him and his
a widening maze and wilderness of cues and catchwords, which the uninitiated will, if they
are bold enough to try interpretation, construe, ever and anon, egregiously amiss—not
seldom into arrant falsity. For this one reason, to say nothing of many others, I consider
no man justified in journalizing what he sees and hears in a domestic circle where he is
not thoroughly at home; and I think there are still higher and better reasons why he should
not do so where he is.
Before I ever met Scott in private, I
had, of course, heard many people describe and discuss his style of
152 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
conversation. Every body seemed to agree that it overflowed with hearty good humour, as
well as plain unaffected good sense and sagacity; but I had heard not a few persons of
undoubted ability and accomplishment maintain, that the genius of the great poet and
novelist rarely, if ever, revealed itself in his talk. It is needless to say, that the
persons I allude to were all his own countrymen, and themselves imbued, more or less, with
the conversational habits derived from a system of education in which the study of
metaphysics occupies a very large share of attention. The best table-talk of Edinburgh was,
and probably still is, in a very great measure made up of brilliant disquisition—such as
might be transferred without alteration to a professor’s note-book, or the pages of a
critical Review—and of sharp word-catchings, ingenious thrusting and parrying of
dialectics, and all the quips and quibblets of bar pleading. It was the talk of a society
to which lawyers and lecturers had, for at least a hundred years, given the tone. From the
date of the Union Edinburgh ceased to be the headquarters of the Scotch nobility—and long
before the time of which I speak they had all but entirely abandoned it as a place of
residence. I think I never knew above two or three of the Peerage to have houses there at
the same time and these were usually among the poorest and most insignificant of their
order. The wealthier gentry had followed their example. Very few of that class ever spent
any considerable part of the year in Edinburgh, except for the purposes of educating their
children, or superintending the progress of a lawsuit; and these were not more likely than
a score or two of comatose and lethargic old Indians, to make head against the established
influences of academical and forensic celebrity. Now Scott’s
| EDINBURGH SOCIETY—1818. | 153 |
tastes and resources had not much in
common with those who had inherited and preserved the chief authority in this provincial
hierarchy of rhetoric. He was highly amused with watching their dexterous logomachies—but
his delight in such displays arose mainly, I cannot doubt, from the fact of their being,
both as to subject-matter and style and method, remote a Scævolæ studiis. He sat by, as he would have done at a
stage-play or a fencing-match, enjoying and applauding the skill exhibited, but without
feeling much ambition to parade himself as a rival either of the foil or the buskin. I can
easily believe, therefore, that in the earlier part of his life—before the blaze of
universal fame had overawed local prejudice, and a new generation, accustomed to hear of
that fame from their infancy, had grown up—it may have been the commonly adopted creed in
Edinburgh, that Scott, however distinguished otherwise, was not to be
named as a table-companion in the same day with this or that master of luminous
dissertation or quick rejoinder, who now sleeps as forgotten as his grandmother. It was
natural enough that persons brought up in the same circle with him, who remembered all his
beginnings, and had but slowly learned to acquiesce in the justice of his claim to
unrivalled honour in literature, should have clung all the closer for that late
acquiescence to their original estimate of him as inferior to themselves in other titles to
admiration. It was also natural that their prejudice on that score should be readily taken
up by the young aspirants who breathed, as it were, the atmosphere of their professional
renown. Perhaps, too, Scott’s steady Toryism, and the effect of
his genius and example in modifying the intellectual sway of the long dominant Whigs in the
north, may have had some share in this matter. However all that may have been, the sub-154 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
stance of what I had been accustomed to hear certainly was, that
Scott had a marvellous stock of queer stories, which he often told
with happy effect, but that, bating these drafts on a portentous memory, set off with a
simple old-fashioned naiveté of humour and pleasantry, his
strain of talk was remarkable neither for depth of remark nor felicity of illustration;
that his views and opinions on the most important topics of practical interest were
hopelessly perverted by his blind enthusiasm for the dreams of by-gone ages; and that, but
for the grotesque phenomenon presented by a great writer of the 19th century gravely
uttering sentiments worthy of his own Dundees and
Invernahyles, the main texture of his discourse
would be pronounced by any enlightened member of modern society rather bald and poor than
otherwise. I think the epithet most in vogue was commonplace.
It will easily be believed, that, in companies such as I have been
alluding to, made up of, or habitually domineered over by voluble Whigs and political
economists, Scott was often tempted to put forth his
Tory doctrines and antiquarian prejudices in an exaggerated shape—in colours, to say the
truth, altogether different from what they assumed under other circumstances, or which had
any real influence upon his mind and conduct on occasions of practical moment. But I fancy
it will seem equally credible, that the most sharp-sighted of these social critics may not
always have been capable of tracing, and doing justice to, the powers which
Scott brought to bear upon the topics which they, not he, had
chosen for discussion. In passing from a gas-lit hall into a room with wax candles, the
guests sometimes complain that they have left splendour for gloom; but let them try by what
sort of light it is most satisfactory to read, write, or embroider, or consider at leisure
under
| EDINBURGH SOCIETY—1818. | 155 |
which of the two either men or
women look their best.
The strongest, purest, and least observed of all lights is, however,
daylight; and his talk was commonplace, just as sunshine is, which gilds the most
indifferent objects, and adds brilliancy to the brightest. As for the old-world anecdotes
which these clever persons were condescending enough to laugh at as pleasant extravagances,
serving merely to relieve and set off the main stream of debate, they were often enough, it
may be guessed, connected with the theme in hand by links not the less apt that they might
be too subtle to catch their bedazzled and self-satisfied optics. There might be keener
knowledge of human nature than was “dreamt of in their philosophy” which
passed with them for commonplace, only because it was clothed in plain familiar household
words, not dressed up in some pedantic masquerade of antithesis. “There are
people,” says Landor, “who
think they write and speak finely, merely because they have forgotten the language in
which their fathers and mothers used to talk to them;” and surely there are a
thousand homely old proverbs, which many a dainty modern would think it beneath his dignity
to quote either in speech or writing, any one of which condenses more wit (take that word
in any of its senses) than could be extracted from all that was ever said or written by the
doctrinaires of the Edinburgh school. Many of those gentlemen
held Scott’s conversation to be commonplace
exactly for the same reason that a child thinks a perfectly limpid stream, though perhaps
deep enough to drown it three times over, must needs be shallow. But it will be easily
believed that the best and highest of their own idols had better means and skill of
measurement: I can never forget the pregnant expression of one of the ablest of that school
and
156 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
party—Lord Cockburn—who,
when some glib youth chanced to echo in his hearing the consolatory tenet of local
mediocrity, answered quietly—“I have the misfortune to think differently from you—in
my humble opinion Walter Scott’s sense is a still more wonderful thing than his genius.”
Indeed I have no sort of doubt that, long before 1818, full justice was
done to Scott, even in these minor things, by all those
of his Edinburgh acquaintance, whether Whig or Tory, on whose personal opinion he could
have been supposed to set much value. With few exceptions, the really able lawyers of his
own or nearly similar standing had ere that time attained stations of judicial dignity, or
were in the springtime of practice; and in either case they were likely to consider general
society much in his own fashion, as the joyous relaxation of life, rather than the theatre
of exertion and display. Their tables were elegantly, some of them sumptuously spread; and
they lived in a pretty constant interchange of entertainments upon a large scale, in every
circumstance of which, conversation included, it was their ambition to imitate those
voluptuous metropolitan circles, wherein most of them had from time to time mingled, and
several of them with distinguished success. Among such prosperous gentlemen, like himself
past the mezzo cammin,
Scott’s picturesque anecdotes, rich easy humour, and gay
involuntary glances of mother-wit, were, it is not difficult to suppose, appreciated above
contributions of a more ambitious stamp; and no doubt his London reputation de salon (which had by degrees risen to a high pitch,
although he cared nothing for it) was not without its effect in Edinburgh. But still the
old prejudice lingered on in the general opinion of the place, especially among the smart
praters of the Outer-House, whose glimpses of the
social habits of their superiors were likely to
be rare, and their gall-bladders to be more distended than their purses.
In truth it was impossible to listen to Scott’s oral narrations, whether gay or serious, or to the felicitous
fun with which he parried absurdities of all sorts, without discovering better qualities in
his talk than wit—and of a higher order; I mean especially a power
of vivid painting—the true and primary sense of what is called Imagination. He was like Jacques
though not a “Melancholy Jacques;”
and “moralized” a common topic “into a thousand
similitudes.” Shakspeare and the
banished Duke would have found him “full of matter.” He disliked mere
disquisitions in Edinburgh, and prepared impromptus in London; and
puzzled the promoters of such, things sometimes by placid silence, sometimes by broad
merriment. To such men he seemed common-place—not so to the most
dexterous masters in what was to some of them almost a science; not so to Rose, Hallam,
Moore, or Rogers,—to Ellis, Macintosh, Croker,
of Canning.
Scott managed to give and receive such great dinners as
I have been alluding to at least as often as any other private gentleman in Edinburgh; but
he very rarely accompanied his wife and daughters to the evening assemblies, which commonly
ensued under other roofs—for early to rise, unless in the case of
spare-fed anchorites, takes for granted early to bed. When he had no
dinner engagement, he frequently gave a few hours to the theatre; but still more
frequently, when the weather was fine, and still more, I believe, to his own satisfaction,
he drove out with some of his family, or a single friend, in an open carriage; the
favourite rides being either to the Blackford Hills, or to Ravelston, and so home by
Corstorphine; or to the beach of Portobello, where Peter was always instructed to keep his horses as
near as pos-
158 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
sible to the sea. More than once, even in the first summer
of my acquaintance with him, I had the pleasure of accompanying him on these evening
excursions; and never did he seem to enjoy himself more fully than when placidly surveying
at such sunset or moonlight hours, either the massive outlines of his “own
romantic town,” or the tranquil expanse of its noble estuary. He delighted,
too, in passing when he could, through some of the quaint windings of the ancient city
itself, now deserted, except at mid-day, by the upper world. How often have I seen him go a
long way round about, rather than miss the opportunity of halting for a few minutes on the
vacant esplanade of Holyrood, or under the darkest shadows of the Castle rock, where it
overhangs the Grassmarket, and the huge slab that still marks where the gibbet of Porteous and the Covenanters had its station. His coachman
knew him too well to move at a Jehu’s pace amidst such scenes as
these. No funeral hearse crept more leisurely than did his landau up the Canongate or the
Cowgate; and not a queer tottering gable but recalled to him some long-buried memory of
splendour or bloodshed, which, by a few words, he set before the hearer in the reality of
life. His image is so associated in my mind with the antiquities of his native place, that
I cannot now revisit them without feeling as if I were treading on his gravestone.
Whatever might happen on the other evenings of the week, he always dined
at home on Sunday, and usually some few friends were then with him, but never any person
with whom he stood on ceremony. These were, it may readily be supposed, the most agreeable
of his entertainments. He came into the room rubbing his hands, his face bright and
gleesome, like a boy arriving at home for the holydays, his Peppers and Mustards gambolling about his heels, and
even the stately
Maida grinning and wagging his tail in sympathy. Among the most
regular guests on these happy evenings were, in my time, as had long before been the case,
Mrs Maclean Clephane of Torloisk, (with whom he
agreed cordially on all subjects except the authenticity of Ossian), and her daughters, whose guardian he had become, at their own
choice. The eldest of them had been for some years married to the Earl Compton (now
Marquis of Northampton), and was of course seldom
in the north; but the others had much of the same tastes and accomplishments which so
highly distinguished the late Lady Northampton; and
Scott delighted especially in their proficiency in
the poetry and music of their native isles. Mr and
Mrs Skene of Rubislaw were frequent attendants
and so were the Macdonald-Buchanans of Drumakiln,
whose eldest daughter, Isabella, was his chief favourite among all his
nieces of the Clerk’s table—as was, among the nephews, my own dear friend and companion, Joseph Hume, a singularly graceful young man, rich in the
promise of hereditary genius, but, alas! cut off in the early bloom of his days. The
well-beloved Erskine was seldom absent; and very
often Terry or James
Ballantyne came with him—sometimes, though less frequently, Constable. Among other persons who now and then appeared
at these “dinners without the silver dishes,” as
Scott called them, I may mention to say nothing of such old
cronies as Mr Clerk, Mr
Thomson, and Mr Kirkpatrick
Sharpe—Sir Alexander Boswell of
Auchinleck, who had all his father Bozzy’s cleverness, good humour, and joviality, without one touch of
his meaner qualities,—wrote Jenny dang the
Weaver, and some other popular songs, which he sang capitally—and was
moreover a thorough bibliomaniac; the late Sir Alexander Don of
Newton, in all courteous and elegant accomplishments the model of a
cavalier; and last, not 160 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
least, William
Allan, R. A., who had shortly before this time returned to Scotland from
several years of travel in Russia and Turkey. At one of these plain hearty dinners,
however, the company rarely exceeded three or four, besides the as yet undivided family.
Scott had a story of a topping goldsmith on the Bridge
who prided himself on being the mirror of Amphitryons,
and accounted for his success by stating that it was his invariable custom to set his own
stomach at ease, by a beef-steak and a pint of port in his backshop, half an hour before
the arrival of his guests. But the host of Castle Street had no occasion to imitate this
prudent arrangement, for his appetite at dinner was neither keen nor nice. Breakfast was
his chief meal. Before that came he had gone through the severest part of his day’s
work, and he then set to with the zeal of Crabbe’s Squire Tovell—
“And laid at once a pound upon his plate.” |
No foxhunter ever prepared himself for the field by more substantial appliances. His
table was always provided, in addition to the usually plentiful delicacies of a Scotch
breakfast, with some solid article, on which he did most lusty execution—a round of beef—a
pasty, such as made Gil Blas’s eyes water—or,
most welcome of all, a cold sheep’s head, the charms of which primitive dainty he has
so gallantly defended against the disparaging sneers of Dr
Johnson and his bear-leader.* A huge
brown loaf flanked his elbow, and it was placed upon a broad wooden trencher, that he might
cut and come again with the bolder knife. Often did the Clerks’
coach, commonly called among themselves the Lively—which
trundled round every morning to pick up the
brotherhood, and then deposited them at the
proper minute in the Parliament Close—often did this lumbering hackney arrive at his door
before he had fully appeased what Homer calls
“the sacred rage of hunger”: and vociferous was the merriment of the
learned uncles, when the surprised poet swung forth to join them,
with an extemporized sandwich, that looked like a ploughman’s luncheon, in his hand.
But this robust supply would have served him in fact for the day. He never tasted any thing
more before dinner, and at dinner he ate almost as sparingly as Squire Tovell’s niece from the boarding-school— ——“Who cut the sanguine flesh in frustums fine, And marvelled much to see the creatures dine.” |
The only dishes he was at all fond of were the old-fashioned ones, to
which he had been accustomed in the days of Saunders
Fairford; and which really are excellent dishes, such, in truth, as Scotland
borrowed from France before Catherine de Medicis
brought in her Italian virtuosi to revolutionize the kitchen like
the court. Of most of these, I believe, he has in the course of his novels found some
opportunity to record his esteem. But, above all, who can forget that his King Jamie, amidst the splendours of Whitehall, thinks himself
an ill-used monarch unless his first course includes cockyleekie?
It is a fact, which some philosophers may think worth setting down, that
Scott’s organization, as to more than one of
the senses, was the reverse of exquisite. He had very little of what musicians call an ear;
his smell was hardly more delicate. I have seen him stare about, quite unconscious of the
cause, when his whole company betrayed their uneasiness at the approach of an overkept
haunch of venison; and neither by the nose nor the palate could he distinguish corked wine
from sound.
162 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
He could never tell Madeira from Sherry—nay, an Oriental
friend having sent him a butt of sheeraz, when he remembered the
circumstance some time afterwards, and called for a bottle to have Sir John Malcolm’s opinion of its quality, it turned
out that his butler, mistaking the label, had already served up half the binn as sherry. Port he considered as physic: he never willingly swallowed
more than one glass of it, and was sure to anathematize a second, if offered, by repeating
John Home’s epigram— “Bold and erect the Caledonian stood, Old was his mutton, and his claret good; Let him drink port, the English statesman cried— He drank the poison, and his spirit died.” |
In truth, he liked no wines except sparkling Champagne and claret; but even as to this
last he was no connoisseur; and sincerely preferred a tumbler of whisky-toddy to the most
precious “liquid ruby” that ever flowed in the cup of a prince. He rarely took
any other potation when quite alone with his family; but at the Sunday board he circulated
the Champagne briskly during dinner, and considered a pint of claret each man’s fair
share afterwards. I should not omit, however, that his Bourdeaux was uniformly preceded by
a small libation of the genuine mountain dew, which he poured with
his own hand, more majorum, for each guest—making
use for the purpose of such a multifarious collection of ancient Highland quaighs (little cups of curiously dovetailed wood, inlaid with silver) as no
Lowland sideboard but his was ever equipped with—but commonly reserving for himself one
that was peculiarly precious in his eyes, as having travelled from Edinburgh to Derby in
the canteen of Prince Charlie. This relic had been
presented to “the wandering Ascanius” by some very careful follower, for its bottom is of glass,
that he who | SUNDAYS IN CASTLE STREET. | 163 |
quaffed might keep his eye
the while upon the dirk hand of his companion.
The sound of music—(even, I suspect, of any sacred music but
psalm-singing)—would be considered indecorous in the streets of Edinburgh on a Sunday
night; so, upon the occasions I am speaking of, the harp was silent, and Otterburne and The Bonny House of Airlie must needs be dispensed with. To make
amends, after tea in the drawing-room, Scott usually
read some favourite author, for the amusement of his little circle; or Erskine, Ballantyne, or Terry did so, at his
request. He himself read aloud high poetry with far greater simplicity, depth, and effect,
than any other man I ever heard; and, in Macbeth or Julius
Cæsar, or the like, I doubt if Kemble
could have been more impressive. Yet the changes of intonation were so gently managed, that
he contrived to set the different interlocutors clearly before us, without the least
approach to theatrical artifice. Not so the others I have mentioned: they all read cleverly
and agreeably, but with the decided trickery of stage recitation. To them he usually gave
the book when it was a comedy, or, indeed, any other drama than Shakspeare’s or Joanna
Baillie’s. Dryden’s Fables, Johnson’s two Satires, and certain detached scenes
of Beaumont and Fletcher, especially that in the Lover’s Progress, where
the ghost of the musical innkeeper makes his appearance, were frequently selected. Of the
poets, his contemporaries, however, there was not one that did not come in for his part. In
Wordsworth, his pet pieces were, I think, the
Song for Brougham
Castle, the Laodamia, and some of the early sonnets:—in Southey, Queen Orraca, Fernando Ramirez, the Lines on the Holly Tree—and, of his larger poems, the Thalaba. Crabbe was perhaps, next to
Shakspeare, the standing resource; but in those days Byron was
164 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
pouring out his spirit fresh
and full; and, if a new piece from his hand had appeared, it was sure to be read by
Scott the Sunday evening afterwards, and that with such delighted
emphasis, as showed how completely the elder bard had kept all his enthusiasm for poetry at
the pitch of youth, all his admiration of genius free, pure, and unstained by the least
drop of literary jealousy. Rare and beautiful example of a happily constituted and
virtuously disciplined mind and character!
Very often something read aloud by himself or his friends suggested an
old story of greater compass than would have suited a dinner-table—and he told it, whether
serious or comical, or, as more frequently happened, part of both, exactly in every respect
in the tone and style of the notes and illustrations to his novels. A great number of his
best oral narratives have, indeed, been preserved in those parting lucubrations; and not a
few in his letters. Yet very many there were of which his pen has left no record—so many,
that, were I to task my memory, I could, I believe, recall the outlines at least of more
than would be sufficient to occupy a couple of these volumes. Possibly, though well aware
how little justice I could do to such things, rather than think of their perishing for
ever, and leaving not even a shadow behind, I may at some future day hazard the attempt.
Let me turn, meanwhile, to some dinner-tables very different from his
own, at which, from this time forward, I often met Scott. It is very true of the societies I am about to describe, that he was
“among them, not of them;” and it is also most true that this fact
was apparent in all the demeanour of his bibliopolical and typographical allies towards him
whenever he visited them under their roofs—not a bit less so than when they were received
at his own board; but still, considering how
| DINNER IN ST JOHN STREET. | 165 |
closely his most important worldly affairs were
connected with the personal character of the Ballantynes, I think it a
part, though neither a proud nor a very pleasing part, of my duty as his biographer, to
record my reminiscences of them and their doings in some detail.
James Ballantyne then lived in St John Street, a row
of good, old-fashioned, and spacious houses, adjoining the Canongate and Holyrood, and at
no great distance from his printing establishment. He had married a few years before the
daughter of a wealthy farmer in Berwickshire—a
quiet, amiable woman, of simple manners, and perfectly domestic habits: a group of fine
young children were growing up about him; and he usually, if not constantly, had under his
roof his aged mother, his and his wife’s tender care of whom it was most pleasing to
witness. As far as a stranger might judge, there could not be a more exemplary household,
or a happier one; and I have occasionally met the poet in St John Street when there were no
other guests but Erskine, Terry, George
Hogarth,* and another intimate friend or two, and when James
Ballantyne was content to appear in his own true and best colours, the kind
head of his family, the respectful but honest school-fellow of Scott, the easy landlord of a plain, comfortable table. But when any great
event was about to take place in the business, especially on the eve of a new novel, there
were doings of a higher strain in St John Street; and to be present at one of those scenes
was truly a rich treat, even—if not especially—for persons who, like myself, had no more
knowledge than the rest of the world as to the
166 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
authorship of Waverley. Then were congregated about the printer all his own literary allies,
of whom a considerable number were by no means personally familiar with “the great unknown:”—who, by the way, owed to him that
widely adopted title;—and He appeared among the rest with his usual open aspect of buoyant
good-humour—although it was not difficult to trace, in the occasional play of his features,
the diversion it afforded him to watch all the procedure of his swelling confidant, and the
curious neophytes that surrounded the well-spread board.
The feast was, to use one of James’s own favourite epithets, gorgeous; an
aldermanic display of turtle and venison, with the suitable accompaniments of iced punch,
potent ale, and generous Madeira. When the cloth was drawn the burley preses arose, with
all he could muster of the port of John Kemble, and
spouted with a sonorous voice the formula of Macbeth—
“Fill full! I drink to the general joy of the whole table!” |
This was followed by “the King, God bless him!” and second
came—“Gentlemen, there is another toast which never has been nor shall be
omitted in this house of mine—I give you the health of Mr
Walter Scott, with three times three!” All honour having been
done to this health, and Scott having briefly thanked the company with
some expressions of warm affection to their host, Mrs
Ballantyne retired; the bottles passed round twice or thrice in the usual
way; and then James rose once more, every vein on his brow distended,
his eyes solemnly fixed upon vacancy, to propose, not as before in his stentorian key, but
with “’bated breath,” in the sort of whisper by which a stage conspirator
thrills the gallery “Gentlemen, a bumper to the immortal Au- | DINNER IN ST JOHN STREET. | 167 |
thor of Waverley!” The uproar of cheering,
in which Scott made a fashion of joining, was succeeded by deep
silence, and then Ballantyne proceeded A something of imposing and mysterious”— |
to lament the obscurity in which his illustrious but too modest correspondent still
chose to conceal himself from the plaudits of the world—to thank the company for the manner
in which the nominis umbra had been received—and
to assure them that the Author of Waverley would, when informed of the
circumstance, feel highly delighted “the proudest hour of his life,”
&c. &c. The cool, demure fun of Scott’s features during
all this mummery was perfect; and Erskine’s
attempt at a gay non-chalance was still more ludicrously
meritorious. Aldiborontiphoscophornio, however,
bursting as he was, knew too well to allow the new novel to be made the subject of
discussion. Its name was announced, and success to it crowned another cup; but after that
no more of Jedediah. To cut the thread, he rolled out
unbidden some one of his many theatrical songs, in a style that would have done no
dishonour to almost any orchestra—The Maid of
Lodi, or, perhaps, the Bay of
Biscay, oh!—or The sweet little
cherub that sits up aloft. Other toasts followed, interspersed with
ditties from other performers; old George Thomson,
the friend of Burns, was ready for one with The Moorland Wedding, or Wittie brew’d a peck o’ maut; and so it
went on, until Scott and Erskine, with any
clerical or very staid personage that had chanced to be admitted, saw fit to withdraw. Then
the scene was changed. The claret and olives made way for broiled bones and a mighty bowl
of punch; and when a few glasses of the hot beverage had restored his powers,
James opened ore rotunda
on the merits of the forthcoming romance. “One chapter—one chapter 168 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
only” was the cry. After “nay,
byr Lady, nay!” and a few more coy shifts, the proof-sheets were at length
produced, and James, with many a prefatory hem, read aloud what he
considered as the most striking dialogue they contained.
The first I heard so read was the interview between Jeanie Deans, the Duke of
Argyle, and Queen Caroline, in Richmond
Park; and notwithstanding some spice of the pompous tricks to which he was addicted, I must
say he did the inimitable scene great justice. At all events, the effect it produced was
deep and memorable, and no wonder that the exulting typographer’s one bumper more to Jedediah
Cleishbotham preceded his parting-stave, which was uniformly The Last Words of Marmion, executed
certainly with no contemptible rivalry of Braham.
What a different affair was a dinner, although probably including many
of the same guests, at the junior partner’s. He in those days retained, I think, no
private apartments attached to his auction-rooms in Hanover Street, over the door of which
he still kept emblazoned “John Ballantyne and
Company, Booksellers.” At any rate, such of his entertainments as I ever saw
Scott partake of, were given at his villa near to
the Frith of Forth, by Trinity; a retreat which the little man had named “Harmony
Hall,” and invested with an air of dainty voluptuous finery, contrasting strikingly
enough with the substantial citizen-like snugness of his elder brother’s domestic
appointments. His house was surrounded by gardens so contrived as to seem of considerable
extent, having many a shady tuft, trellised alley, and mysterious alcove, interspersed
among their bright parterres. It was a fairy-like labyrinth, and there was no want of
pretty Armidas, such as they might be, to glide
half-seen among its mazes. The
sitting-rooms opened upon gay and perfumed conservatories, and
John’s professional excursions to Paris and Brussels in
quest of objects of virtu, had supplied both the
temptation and the means to set forth the interior in a fashion that might have satisfied
the most fastidious petite maitresse of Norwood
or St Denis. John too was a married man: he had, however, erected for
himself a private wing, the accesses to which, whether from the main building or the
bosquet, were so narrow that it was physically impossible for the handsome and portly
lady who bore his name to force her person
through any one of them. His dinners were in all respects Parisian, for his wasted palate
disdained such John Bull luxuries as were all in all
with James. The piquant pasty of Strasburg or Perigord was never to
seek; and even the pièce de résistance was probably a
boar’s head from Coblentz, or a turkey ready stuffed with truffles from the Palais
Royal. The pictures scattered among John’s innumerable mirrors,
were chiefly of theatrical subjects—many of them portraits of beautiful actresses—the same
Peg Woffingtons, Bellamys, Kitty Clives, and so
forth, that found their way in the sequel to Charles
Matthews’s gallery at Highgate. Here that exquisite comedian’s
own mimicries and parodies were the life and soul of many a festival, and here, too, he
gathered from his facetious host not a few of the richest materials for his at homes and monopolylogues. But, indeed,
whatever actor or singer of eminence visited Edinburgh, of the evenings when he did not
perform several were sure to be reserved for Trinity. Here Braham quavered, and here Liston
drolled his best—here Johnstone, and Murray, and Yates,
mixed jest and stave—here Kean revelled and rioted
and here the Roman Kemble often played the Greek
from sunset to dawn. Nor did the popular cantatrice or danseuse of the
time disdain to freshen her 170 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
roses, after a laborious week, amidst
these Paphian arbours of Harmony Hall.
Johnny had other tastes that were equally expensive.
He had a well-furnished stable, and followed the foxhounds whenever the cover was within an
easy distance. His horses were all called after heroes in Scott’s poems or novels; and at this time he usually rode up to his
auction on a tall milk-white hunter, yclept Old
Mortality; attended by a leash or two of greyhounds,—Die Vernon, Jenny Dennison, and so
forth, by name. The featherweight himself appeared uniformly, hammer-in-hand, in the
half-dress of some sporting club—a light grey frock, with emblems of the chase on its
silver buttons, white cord breeches, and jockey-boots in Meltonian order. Yet he affected
in the pulpit rather a grave address; and was really one of the most plausible and imposing
of the Puff tribe. Probably Scott’s presence overawed his
ludicrous propensities; for the poet was, when sales were going on, almost a daily
attendant in Hanover Street, and himself not the least energetic of the numerous
competitors for Johnny’s uncut fifteeners, Venetian lamps, Milanese cuirasses, and old Dutch cabinets. Maida, by the way, was so well aware of his master’s habits,
that about the time when the Court of Session was likely to break up for the day, he might
usually be seen couched in expectation among Johnny’s own tail
of greyhounds at the threshold of the mart.
It was at one of those Trinity dinners this summer, that I first saw
Constable. Being struck with his appearance, I
asked Scott who he was, and he told me—expressing some
surprise—that any body should have lived a winter or two in Edinburgh without knowing, by
sight at least, a citizen whose name was so familiar to the world. I happened to say that I
had not been prepared to find the great bookseller a man of
such gentlemanlike and even distinguished bearing.
Scott smiled and answered—“Ay,
Constable is indeed a grandlooking chield. He puts me in mind
of Fielding’s apology for Lady Booby—to wit, that Joseph
Andrews had an air which, to those who had not seen many noblemen, would
give an idea of nobility.” I had not in those days been much initiated in the
private jokes of what is called, by way of excellence, the trade,
and was puzzled when Scott, in the course of the dinner, said to
Constable, “Will your Czarish Majesty do me the honour to
take a glass of Champagne?” I asked the master of the feast for an
explanation. “Oh!” said he, “are you so green as not to know
that Constable long since dubbed himself The
Czar of Muscovy, John Murray The Emperor of the West, and Longman and his string of partners The
Divan?”—“And what title,” I asked, “has
Mr John Ballantyne himself found in this new
almanac imperial?” “Let that flee stick to
the wa’,” quoth Johnny; “When I set up for a
bookseller, The Crafty christened me The Dey of
Alljeers—but he now considers me as next thing to dethroned.” He
added—“His majesty the autocrat is too fond of these nicknames. One day a
partner of the house of Longman was dining with him in the
country, to settle an important piece of business, about which there occurred a good
deal of difficulty. ‘What fine swans you have in your pond there,’
said the Londoner, by way of parenthesis.—‘Swans!’ cried
Constable—‘they are only geese, man. There are just
five of them, if you please to observe, and their names are
Longman, Hurst,
Rees, Orme, and Brown.’
This skit cost The Crafty a good bargain.”
It always appeared to me that James
Ballantyne felt his genius rebuked in the presence of Constable; his manner was constrained, his smile servile,
his hilarity
172 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
elaborate. Not so with Johnny: the little fellow never seemed more airily frolicsome than when he
capered for the amusement of the Czar.* I never, however, saw those two together, where I
am told the humours of them both were exhibited to the richest advantage—I mean at the
Sunday dinners with which Constable regaled, among others, his own
circle of literary serfs, and when “Jocund Johnny” was
very commonly his croupier. There are stories enough of practical jokes upon such
occasions, some of them near akin to those which the author of Humphrey
Clinker has thought fit to record of his own suburban villa, in the most
diverting of young Melford’s letters to Sir Watkin Philips. I have heard, for example, a luculent
description of poor Elshender
Campbell, and another drudge of the same class, running a race after
dinner for a new pair of breeches, which Mr David
Bridges, tailor in ordinary to this northern potentate—himself a wit, a
virtuoso, and the croupier on that day in lieu of Rigdum—had been
instructed to bring with him, and display before the threadbare rivals. But I had these
pictures from John Ballantyne, and I daresay they might be
overcharged. That Constable was a most bountiful and generous patron
to the ragged tenants of Grub Street there can, however, be no doubt; and as little that
John himself acted on all occasions by them in the same spirit,
and this to an extent greatly beyond what prudence (if he had ever consulted that guide in
any thing) would have dictated.
* “Now, John,” cried Constable one
evening after he had told one of his best stories—“Now,
John, is that true?” His object evidently was,
in Iago’s phrase, to let
down the pegs; but Rigdum answered gaily, “True,
indeed? Not one word of it!—any blockhead may stick to truth, my hearty—but
’tis a sad hamperer of genius.”
|
When I visited Constable, as I
often did at a period somewhat later than that of which I now speak, and for the most part
in company with Scott, I found the bookseller
established in a respectable country gentleman’s seat, some six or seven miles out of
Edinburgh, and doing the honours of it with all the ease that might have been looked for
had he been the long-descended owner of the place. There was no foppery, no show, no idle
luxury, but to all appearance the plain abundance and simple enjoyment of hereditary
wealth. His conversation was manly and vigorous, abounding in Scotch anecdotes of the old
time, which he told with a degree of spirit and humour only second to his great
author’s. No man could more effectually control, when he had a mind, either the
extravagant vanity which, on too many occasions, made him ridiculous, or the despotic
temper, which habitually held in fear and trembling all such as were in any sort dependent
on his Czarish Majesty’s pleasure. In him I never saw (at this period) any thing but
the unobtrusive sense and the calm courtesy of a well-bred gentleman. His very equipage
kept up the series of contrasts between him and the two Ballantynes.
Constable went back and forward between the town and Polton in a
deep-hung and capacious green barouche, without any pretence at heraldic blazonry, drawn by
a pair of sleek, black, long-tailed horses, and conducted by a grave old coachman in plain
blue livery. The Printer of the Canongate drove himself and his wife about the streets and
suburbs in a snug machine, which did not overburthen one powerful and steady cob; while the
gay auctioneer, whenever he left the saddle for the box, mounted a bright blue dog-cart,
and rattled down the Newhaven road with two high-mettled steeds, prancing tandem before
him, and most probably—especially if he was on his way to the
174 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
races
at Musselburgh—with some “sweet singer of Israel” flaming, with all her
feathers, beside him. On such occasions, by the by, Johnny sometimes
had a French horn with him, and he played on it with good skill, and with an energy by no
means prudent in the state of his lungs.
The Sheriff told with peculiar
unction the following anecdote of this spark. The first time he went over to pick up
curiosities at Paris, it happened that he met, in the course of his traffickings, a certain
brother bookseller of Edinburgh, as unlike him as one man could well be to another—a grave,
dry Presbyterian, rigid in all his notions as the buckle of his wig. This precise worthy
having ascertained John’s address, went to
call on him, a day or two afterwards, with the news of some richly illuminated missal,
which he might possibly be glad to make prize of. On asking for his friend, a smiling
laquais de place informed him that Monsieur had gone out, but that Madame was at
home. Not doubting that Mrs Ballantyne had
accompanied her husband on his trip, he desired to pay his respects to Madame, and was ushered in accordingly. “But oh, Mr
Scott!” said, or rather groaned the austere elder, on his
return from this modern Babylon “oh, Mr Scott, there was nae
Mrs John yonder, but a painted Jezabel sittin’ up in her
bed, wi’ a wheen impudent French limmers like hersel’, and twa or three
whiskered blackguards, takin’ their collation o’ nicknacks and champagne
wine! I ran out o’ the house as if I had been shot. What judgment will this
wicked warld come to! The Lord pity us!” Scott was a
severe enough censor in the general of such levities, but somehow, in the case of
Rigdumfunnidos, he seemed to regard them with much the same
toleration as the naughty tricks of a monkey in the “Jardin des Plantes.”
Why did Scott persist in mixing up
all his most important concerns with such people as I have been describing? I asked himself
that question too unceremoniously at a long subsequent period, and in due time the reader
shall see the answer I received. But it left the main question, to my apprehension, as much
in the dark as ever. I shall return to the sad subject hereafter more seriously; but in the
meantime let it suffice to say, that he was the most patient, long-suffering, affectionate,
and charitable of mankind; that in the case of both the Ballantynes he
could count, after all, on a sincerely, nay, a passionately devoted attachment to his
person; that, with the greatest of human beings, use is in all but unconquerable power; and
that he who so loftily tossed aside the seemingly most dangerous assaults of flattery, the
blandishment of dames, the condescension of princes, the enthusiasm of crowds—had still his
weak point upon which two or three humble besiegers, and one unwearied, though most
frivolous underminer, well knew how to direct their approaches. It was a favourite saw of
his own, that the wisest of our race often reserve the average stock of folly to be all
expended upon some one flagrant absurdity.
Sir William Allan (1782-1850)
Scottish painter who traveled in Russia and exhibited at the Royal Academy to which he
was elected in 1835; he was president of the Royal Scottish Academy (1838).
Joanna Baillie (1762-1851)
Scottish poet and dramatist whose
Plays on the Passions
(1798-1812) were much admired, especially the gothic
De Montfort,
produced at Drury Lane in 1800.
Hermione Ballantyne [née Parker] (d. 1857)
The step-daughter of the schoolmaster William Rutherford of Uxbridge; in 1797 she married
the publisher John Ballantyne.
James Ballantyne (1772-1833)
Edinburgh printer in partnership with his younger brother John; the company failed in the
financial collapse of 1826.
John Ballantyne (1774-1821)
Edinburgh publisher and literary agent for Walter Scott; he was the younger brother of
the printer James Ballantyne.
Francis Beaumont (1585-1616)
English playwright, often in collaboration with John Fletcher; author of
The Knight of the Burning Pestle (1607).
George Anne Bellamy (1731 c.-1788)
The illegitimate daughter of an actress and an Irish peer, she pursued a career on the
stage and left a memoir,
An Apology for the Life of George Anne
Bellamy (1785).
James Boswell (1740-1795)
Scottish man of letters, author of
The Life of Samuel Johnson
(1791).
John Braham (1777 c.-1856)
English tenor who began his career at the Covent Garden and Drury Lane theaters; he
assisted Isaac Nathan in setting Byron's
Hebrew Melodies.
David Bridges (1776-1840)
Edinburgh clothier, connoisseur, and secretary of the Society of Dilettanti.
Thomas Brown (1777 c.-1869)
A partner in Thomas Longman's bookselling firm, where he began as an apprentice in
1794.
Hector Macdonald Buchanan of Drumnakiln (d. 1828)
Of Ross Priory, son of Coll Macdonald of Boisdale; he was Writer to the Signet (1791) and
Principal Clerk of Session (1805-1828). He assumed the name of his wife, Jean Buchanan,
whom he married in 1793.
Robert Burns (1759-1796)
Scottish poet and song collector; author of
Poems, chiefly in the
Scottish Dialect (1786).
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
Alexander Carlyle [Jupiter Carlyle] (1722-1805)
Educated at Edinburgh University, Glasgow, and Leiden, he was Minister of Inveresk
(1748-1805); his
Autobiography (1860) contains pen portraits of many
famous contemporaries.
Catherine de Médicis (1519-1589)
The daughter of Lorenzo II de Medici, duke of Urbino; after her marriage she was queen
consort of King Henry II of France from 1547 to 1559 and then regent in behalf of her
son.
Marianne Clephane [née MacLean] (d. 1843)
The daughter of Lachlan Maclean of Torloisk in Mull (d. 1799); in 1790 she married
Major-General William Douglas Clephane (d. 1803). She was a friend of Sir Walter
Scott.
William Clerk (1771-1847)
Edinburgh lawyer, the son of John Clerk of Eldin and brother of Lord Eldin (1757-1832);
he was Clerk of the Jury Court (1815) and a friend of Sir Walter Scott. He is said to be
the model for Darsie Latimer in
Redgauntlet.
Henry Cockburn, Lord Cockburn (1779-1854)
Scottish judge, reformer, and friend of Francis Jeffrey; he wrote a
Life of Lord Jeffrey (1852) and
Memorials of his Time
(1856).
Spencer Joshua Alwyne Compton, second marquess of Northampton (1790-1851)
Son of the first marquis; he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and was Whig MP
for Northampton (1812-20) before residing in Italy, 1820-30; he succeeded to the title in
1828 and was president of the Royal Society (1838-49).
Archibald Constable (1774-1827)
Edinburgh bookseller who published the
Edinburgh Review and works
of Sir Walter Scott; he went bankrupt in 1826.
George Crabbe (1754-1832)
English poet renowned for his couplet verse and gloomy depictions of country persons and
places; author of the
The Village (1783),
The
Parish Register (1807),
The Borough (1810), and
Tales of the Hall (1819).
Robert Crawford (1695-1733 c.)
Scottish poet and song-writer who contributed to Allan Ramsay's
Tea-Table Miscellany (1724-37).
John Wilson Croker (1780-1857)
Secretary of the Admiralty (1810) and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he edited an elaborate edition of Boswell's
Life of
Johnson (1831).
Sir Alexander Don, sixth baronet (1780-1826)
The son of the fifth baronet (d. 1815); educated at Eton College, he was MP for
Roxburghshire (1814-26). He was an acquaintance of Sir Walter Scott (who described him as a
bon vivant) and William Jerdan.
Henry Home Drummond of Blair Drummond (1783-1867)
Scottish Advocate, educated at Oxford; he was MP for Stirlingshire (1821-31) and
Perthshire (1840-52). He was the grandson of Lord Kames.
John Dryden (1631-1700)
English poet laureate, dramatist, and critic; author of
Of Dramatick
Poesie (1667),
Absalom and Achitophel (1681),
Alexander's Feast; or the Power of Musique (1697),
The Works of Virgil translated into English Verse (1697), and
Fables (1700).
George Ellis (1753-1815)
English antiquary and critic, editor of
Specimens of Early English
Poets (1790), friend of Walter Scott.
William Erskine, Lord Kinneder (1768-1822)
The son of an episcopal clergyman of the same name, he was a Scottish advocate and a
close friend and literary advisor to Sir Walter Scott.
Henry Fielding (1707-1754)
English dramatist, essayist, and novelist; author of
Joseph
Andrews (1742) and
The History of Tom Jones (1749).
John Fletcher (1579-1625)
English playwright, author of
The Faithful Shepherdess (1610) and
of some fifteen plays in collaboration with Francis Beaumont.
Johann Wolfgang Goethe (1749-1832)
German poet, playwright, and novelist; author of
The Sorrows of Young
Werther (1774) and
Faust (1808, 1832).
Henry Hallam (1777-1859)
English historian and contributor to the
Edinburgh Review, author
of
Introduction to the Literature of Europe, 4 vols (1837-39) and
other works. He was the father of Tennyson's Arthur Hallam.
Gavin Hamilton (1723-1798)
Neoclassical Scottish painter educated at Glasgow University; he conducted excavations at
Rome.
George Hogarth (1783-1870)
Scottish journalist, music critic, and father-in-law of Charles Dickens; with his
brother-in-law James Ballantyne, he bought the
Edinburgh Weekly
Journal (1817); he afterwards wrote for the
Morning
Chronicle and other London papers.
Henry Home, Lord Kames (1696-1782)
Scottish jurist and Enlightenment philosopher; author of
Elements of
Criticism (1762) and
Sketches of History of Man
(1774).
John Home (1722-1808)
Scottish playwright and clergyman, the author of
Douglas and
History of the Rebellion, 1745 (1802).
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
Joseph Hume (d. 1819)
Scottish advocate, the son of David Hume of Ninewells; he was a friend of Walter Scott
and John Gibson Lockhart.
Thomas Hurst (1770 c.-1842)
Originally a bookseller in Leeds, he began working in London late in the eighteenth
century; in 1804 he partnered with the firm of T. N. Longman. He died in the
Charterhouse.
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
English man of letters, among many other works he edited
A Dictionary
of the English Language (1755) and Shakespeare (1765), and wrote
Lives of the Poets (1779-81).
John Henry Johnstone (1749-1828)
Irish tenor and actor who performed at Smock Alley and Covent Garden.
Edmund Kean (1787-1833)
English tragic actor famous for his Shakespearean roles.
John Philip Kemble (1757-1823)
English actor renowned for his Shakespearean roles; he was manager of Drury Lane
(1783-1802) and Covent Garden (1803-1808).
Lady Caroline Lamb [née Ponsonby] (1785-1828)
Daughter of the third earl of Bessborough; she married the Hon. William Lamb (1779-1848)
and fictionalized her infatuation with Lord Byron in her first novel,
Glenarvon (1816).
Walter Savage Landor (1775-1864)
English poet and man of letters, author of the epic
Gebir (1798)
and
Imaginary Conversations (1824-29). He resided in Italy from 1815
to 1835.
John Liston (1776 c.-1846)
English comic actor who performed at the Haymarket and Covent Garden.
Thomas Norton Longman (1771-1842)
A leading London publisher whose authors included Southey, Wordsworth, Scott, and
Moore.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
Sir John Malcolm (1769-1833)
Indian administrator and diplomat; author of
Political History of
India (1811); his life of Clive was posthumously published in 1836.
Charles Mathews (1776-1835)
Comic actor at the Haymarket and Covent Garden theaters; from 1818 he gave a series of
performances under the title of
Mr. Mathews at Home.
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
William Henry Murray (1790-1852)
Actor and theater manager, the illegitimate son of the playwright Charles Murray; he
performed in Ediburgh adaptations of Walter Scott's novels.
Francis Nicoll (1771-1835)
Educated at King's College, Aberdeen, he was principal of the United College of St
Leonard and St Salvator (1820) and rector of St Andrews University (1822).
Cosmo Orme (1780 c.-1859)
London bookseller of Scottish origin; he was a partner of Thomas Longman before his
retirement in 1841.
Ossian (250 fl.)
Legendary blind bard of Gaelic story to whom James Macpherson attributed his poems
Fingal and
Temora.
John Porteous (1695-1736)
Leader of the City Guard in Edinburgh who was lynched after firing upon a mob; the story
is related by Walter Scott in
The Heart of Midlothian (1818).
Owen Rees (1770-1837)
London bookseller; he was the partner of Thomas Norton Longman and friend of the poet
Thomas Moore.
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).
William Stewart Rose (1775-1843)
Second son of George Rose, treasurer of the navy (1744-1818); he introduced Byron to
Frere's
Whistlecraft poems and translated Casti's
Animale parlante (1819).
Charles Kirkpatrick Sharpe (1781-1851)
Scottish poet, painter, editor, antiquary, and eccentric; he edited James Kirkton's
Secret and True History of the Church of Scotland (1817) with
elaborate notes mocking his author.
James Skene of Rubislaw (1775-1864)
A life-long friend of Sir Walter Scott, who dedicated a canto of
Marmion to him.
Jane Skene (1787-1862)
The daughter of Sir William Forbes of Pitsligo (1739-1806); in 1806 she married James
Skene. Both Skenes were friends of Sir Walter Scott.
Tobias Smollett (1721-1771)
Scottish physician and man of letters; author of the novels
Roderick
Random (1747) and
Humphry Clinker (1771).
Robert Southey (1774-1843)
Poet laureate and man of letters whose contemporary reputation depended upon his prose
works, among them the
Life of Nelson, 2 vols (1813),
History of the Peninsular War, 3 vols (1823-32) and
The Doctor, 7 vols (1834-47).
Daniel Terry (1789-1829)
English actor; after a career in provincial theater made his London debut in 1812. A
close friend of Walter Scott, he performed in theatrical adaptations of Scott's
novels.
George Thomson (1757-1851)
Scottish music publisher and friend of Robert Burns who solicited poems from Byron;
issued
A Select Collection of Original Scotish Airs (1793).
Thomas Thomson (1768-1852)
Scottish lawyer and man of letters; he was one of the projectors of the
Edinburgh Review and succeeded Sir Walter Scott as president of the Bannatyne
Club (1832-52).
Thomas Thomson (1773-1852)
Friend of James Mill and professor of chemistry at the University of Glasgow; he
contributed to the
Quarterly Review.
Margaret Woffington [Peg] (1720-1760)
Irish-born actress, daughter of a brick-layer, she was celebrated for the Shakespearian
roles she performed in London.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
Frederick Henry Yates (1797-1842)
English actor and theater manager educated at Charterhouse; he performed with Charles
Kemble and was a partner of Charles Mathews in the Adelphi Theatre (1825-35).