“I wrote yesterday, but I am induced immediately to
answer your letter, because I think you expect from it an effect upon my mind
rather different from what it produces. A man may be violent and outrageous in
his liquor, but wine seldom makes a gentleman a blackguard, or instigates a
loyal man to utter sedition. Wine unveils the passions and throws away
restraint, but it does not create habits or opinions which did not previously
exist in the mind. Besides, what sort of defence is this of intemperance? I
suppose if a private commits riot, or is disobedient in his cups, his officers
do not admit whisky to be an excuse. I have seen enough of that sort of society
where habitual indulgence drowned at last every distinction between what is
worthy and unworthy, and I have seen young men with the fairest prospects turn
out degraded miserable outcasts before their life was half spent, merely from
soaking and sotting, and the bad habits these naturally lead to. You tell me
* * * and * * * frequent good
society and are well received in it, and I am very glad to hear this is the
case. But such stories as these will soon occasion their seclusion from the
best
66 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
“I mentioned in my last that you were to continue in the 18th until the regiment went to India, and that I trusted you would get the step within the twelve months that the corps yet remains in Europe, which will make your exchange easier. But it is of far more importance that you learn to command yourself than that you should be raised higher in commanding others. It gives me pain to write to you in terms of censure, but my duty must be done, else I cannot expect you to do yours. All here are well and send love. I am your affectionate father,