Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Sir Walter Scott to Joanna Baillie, 10 February 1822
“Edinburgh, Feb. 10, 1822.
“My Dear Friend,
“No one has so good a title as you to command me in
all my strength, and in all my weakness. I do not believe I have a single scrap
of unpublished poetry, for I was never a willing composer of occasional pieces,
and when I have been guilty of such effusions, it was to answer the purpose of
some publisher of songs, or the like immediate demand. The consequence is, that
all these trifles have been long before the public, and whatever I add to your
collection must have the grace of novelty, in case it should have no other. I
do not know what should make it rather a melancholy task for me nowadays to sit
down to versify—I did not use to think it so—but I have ceased, I know not why,
to find pleasure in it, and yet I do not think I have lost any of the faculties
I ever possessed for the task; but I was never fond of my own poetry, and am
now much out of conceit with it. All this another person less candid in
construction than yourself would interpret into a hint to send a good dose of
praise—but you know we have agreed long ago to be above ordinances, like
Cromwell’s saints. When I go
to the country upon the 12th of March, I will try what the water-side can do
for me, for there is no inspiration in causeways and kennels, or even the Court
of Session. You have the victory over me now, for I remember laughing at you
for saying you could only write your beautiful lyrics upon a fine warm day. But
what is this something to be? I wish you would give me a subject, for that
would cut off half my difficulties.
“I am delighted with the prospect of seeing Miss Edgeworth, and making her personal
acquaintance. I expect her to be just what you describe, a being totally void
of affectation, and who, like one other lady
158 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
of my
acquaintance, carries her literary reputation as freely and easily as the
milk-maid in my country does the leglen, which she
carries on her head, and walks as gracefully with it as a duchess. Some of the
fair sex, and some of the foul sex, too, carry their renown in London fashion
on a yoke and a pair of pitchers. The consequence is, that besides poking
frightfully, they are hitting every one on the shins with their buckets. Now
this is all nonsense, too fantastic to be written to any body but a person of
good sense. By the way, did you know Miss
Austen, authoress of some novels which have a great deal of
nature in them? nature in ordinary and middle life, to be sure, but valuable
from its strong resemblance and correct drawing. I wonder which way she carried
her pail?*
“I did indeed rejoice at Erskine’s promotion. There is a degree of melancholy
attending the later stage of a barrister’s profession, which, though no
one cares for sentimentalities attendant on a man of fifty or thereabout, in a
rusty black bombazine gown, are not the less cruelly felt; their business
sooner or later fails, for younger men will work cheaper, and longer, and
harder—besides
* When the late collection of Sir Walter Scott’s
Prose
Miscellanies was preparing, the publisher of the Quarterly Review led me into a mistake, which I may as well
take this opportunity of apologizing for. Glancing hastily over his
private records, he included in his list of Sir
Walter’s contributions to his journal an article on
Miss Austen’s novels;
and as the opinions which the article expresses on their merits and
defects harmonized with the usual tone of
Scott’s conversation, I saw no reason to
doubt that he had drawn it up, although the style might have been
considerably doctored by Mr
Gifford. I have since learned that the reviewal was in
fact written by Dr Whateley,—now
Archbishop of Dublin. Miss Austen’s novels,
especially Emma and
Northanger
Abbey, were great favourites with
Scott, and he often read chapters of them to his
evening circle. |
that the cases are few, comparatively,
in which senior counsel are engaged, and it is not etiquette to ask any one in
that advanced age to take the whole burden of a cause. Insensibly, without
decay of talent, and without losing the public esteem, there is a gradual decay
of employment, which almost no man ever practised thirty years without
experiencing; and thus the honours and dignities of the Bench, so hardly
earned, and themselves leading but to toils of another kind, are peculiarly
desirable. Erskine would have sat there ten years ago, but
for wretched intrigues. He has a very poetical and elegant mind, but I do not
know of any poetry of his writing, except some additional stanzas to Collins’ ode on Scottish superstitions,
long since published in the Border
Minstrelsy. I doubt it would not be consistent with his high office
to write poetry now, but you may add his name with Mrs
Scott’s (Heaven forgive me! I should have said
Lady Scott’s) and mine to the subscription-list.
I will not promise to get you more, for people always look as if you were
asking the guinea for yourself—there John
Bull has the better of Sawney; to be sure he has more guineas to bestow, but we retain
our reluctance to part with hard cash, though profuse enough in our
hospitality. I have seen a laird, after giving us more champagne and claret
than we cared to drink, look pale at the idea of paying a crown in charity.
“I am seriously tempted, though it would be sending
coals to Newcastle with a vengeance, not to mention salt to Dysart, and all
other superfluous importations—I am, I say, strangely tempted to write for your
Protegés a dramatic scene on an incident which happened at the battle of
Halidon Hill (I think). It was to me a nursery-tale, often told by Mrs Margaret Swinton, sister of my maternal grandmother; a fine old lady of high
blood, and of as high a mind, who was lineally descended from
160 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
one of the actors. The anecdote was briefly thus. The
family of Swinton is very ancient, and was once very
powerful, and at the period of this battle the knight of Swinton was gigantic
in stature, unequalled in strength, and a sage and experienced leader to boot.
In one of those quarrels which divided the kingdom of Scotland in every corner,
he had slain his neighbour, the head of the Gordon family,
and an inveterate feud had ensued; for it seems that powerful as the
Gordons always were, the Swintons
could then bide a bang with them. Well, the battle of Halidon began, and the
Scottish army, unskilfully disposed on the side of a hill where no arrow fell
in vain, was dreadfully galled by the archery of the English, as usual; upon
which Swinton approached the Scottish General, requesting
command of a body of cavalry, and pledging his honour that he would, if so
supported, charge and disperse the English archers—one of the manœuvres by
which Bruce gained the battle of
Bannockburn. This was refused, out of stupidity or sullenness, by the General,
on which Swinton expressed his determination to charge at
the head of his own followers, though totally inadequate for the purpose. The
young Gordon heard the proposal, son of him whom
Swinton had slain, and with one of those irregular
bursts of generosity and feeling which redeem the dark ages from the character
of utter barbarism, he threw himself from his horse, and kneeled down before
Swinton.—‘I have not yet been
knighted,’ he said, ‘and never can I take the honour from
the hand of a truer, more loyal, more valiant leader, than he who slew my
father: grant me,’ he said, ‘the boon I ask, and I unite
my forces to yours, that we may live and die together.’ His
feudal enemy became instantly his godfather in chivalry, and his ally in
battle. Swinton knighted the young
Gordon, and they rushed down at the head of their united retainers, dispersed the
archery, and would have turned the battle, had they been supported. At length
they both fell, and all who followed them were cut off, and it was remarked,
that while the fight lasted, the old giant guarded the young man’s life
more than his own, and the same was indicated by the manner in which his body
lay stretched over that of Gordon. Now, do not laugh at my
Berwickshire burr, which I assure you is literally and lineally handed down to
me by my grandmother, from this fine old Goliah. Tell me,
if I can clamper up the story into a sort of single scene, will it answer your
purpose? I would rather try my hand in blank verse than rhyme.
“The story, with many others of the same kind, is
consecrated to me by the remembrance of the narrator, with her brown silk gown,
and triple ruffles, and her benevolent face, which was always beside our beds
when there were childish complaints among us. Poor Aunt Margaret had a most shocking fate, being murdered by a
favourite maid-servant in a fit of insanity, when I was about ten years old;
the catastrophe was much owing to the scrupulous delicacy and high courage of
my poor relation, who would not have the assistance of men called in for
exposing the unhappy wretch her servant. I think you will not ask for a letter
from me in a hurry again, but, as I have no chance of seeing you for a long
time, I must be contented with writing. My kindest respects attend Mrs Agnes, your kind brother and family, and the Richardsons, little and big, short and tall;
and believe me most truly yours,
“P.S.—Sophia is come up to her Sunday dinner, and begs to send a
thousand remembrances, with the important intelligence that her baby
actually says ma-ma, and
162 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
bow wow, when he sees the
dog. Moreover, he is christened
John
Hugh; and I intend to plant two little knolls at their
cottage, to be called Mount Saint John, and Hugomont. The Papa also sends
his respects.”
Jane Austen (1775-1817)
English novelist, author of
Sense and Sensibility (1811) and
Pride and Prejudice (1813).
Agnes Baillie (1760-1861)
The daughter of the Scottish cleric James Baillie and elder sister of the poet Joanna
Baillie with whom she lived in Hampstead for many decades.
Matthew Baillie (1761-1823)
Physician and brother of Joanna Baillie; as successor to the anatomist William Hunter he
treated the pedal deformities of both Walter Scott and Lord Byron.
William Collins (1721-1759)
English poet, author of
Persian Eclogues (1742),
Odes on Several Descriptive and Allegorical Subjects (1746), and
Ode on the Popular Superstitions of the Highlands (1788).
Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658)
English general and statesman; fought with the parliamentary forces at the battles of
Edgehill (1642) and Marston Moor (1644); led expedition to Ireland (1649) and was named
Lord Protector (1653).
Maria Edgeworth (1768-1849)
Irish novelist; author of
Castle Rackrent (1800)
Belinda (1801),
The Absentee (1812) and
Ormond (1817).
William Erskine, Lord Kinneder (1768-1822)
The son of an episcopal clergyman of the same name, he was a Scottish advocate and a
close friend and literary advisor to Sir Walter Scott.
William Gifford (1756-1826)
Poet, scholar, and editor who began as a shoemaker's apprentice; after Oxford he
published
The Baviad (1794),
The Maeviad
(1795), and
The Satires of Juvenal translated (1802) before becoming
the founding editor of the
Quarterly Review (1809-24).
John Hugh Lockhart (1821-1831)
The first child of John Gibson Lockhart and his wife Sophia, for whom Sir Walter Scott
wrote
Tales of a Grandfather (1828-1831).
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
John Richardson of Kirklands (1780-1864)
Scottish lawyer and parliamentary solicitor in London from 1806; he was Thomas Campbell's
legal advisor and a friend of Sir Walter Scott.
Jean Rutherford [née Swinton] (1739 fl.)
The daughter of Sir John Swinton of Swinton; in 1731 she married Professor John
Rutherford, who remarried in 1743. She was the maternal grandmother of Sir Walter
Scott.
Margaret Swinton (d. 1780)
The daughter of Sir John Swinton (d. 1823) and sister of Jean Rutherford and Joan Keith
of Ravelston. She was Sir Walter Scott's great-aunt and the subject of his
My Aunt Margaret's Mirror.
Richard Whately, archbishop of Dublin (1787-1863)
The nephew of the Shakespeare critic Thomas Whately (d. 1772); he was educated at Oriel
College, Oxford where he was professor of political economy (1829-31) and was archbishop of
Dublin (1831-63). A prolific writer, he offered a rationalist defense of
Anglicanism.
The Quarterly Review. (1809-1967). Published by John Murray, the
Quarterly was instigated by Walter
Scott as a Tory rival to the
Edinburgh Review. It was edited by
William Gifford to 1824, and by John Gibson Lockhart from 1826 to 1853.