“The state of the east window is peculiarly precarious, and it may soon give way if not assisted. There would not only be dishonour in that, as Trinculo says when he lost his bottle in the pool, but an infinite loss. Messrs Smallwood and Smith concur, there will be no difficulty in erecting a scaffolding strong enough to support the weight of an interior arch or beam, as we call it, of wood, so as to admit the exterior two rows of the stone-arch to be lifted and replaced, stone by stone, and made as sure as ever they were. The other ribs
182 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. |
“There is one way in which the expense would be greatly lessened, and the appearance of the building in the highest degree improved, but it depends on a proviso. Provided then that the whole eastern window, with the vault above it, were repaired and made, as Law says, sartum atque tectum, there could be no objection to taking down the modern roof with the clumsy buttresses on the northern side.* Indeed I do not see how the roofs continuing could in any respect protect the window, though it may be very doubtful whether the west gable should be pulled down, which would expose the east window to a thorough draft of air, a circumstance which the original builder did not contemplate, and against which, therefore, he made no provision. The taking down this roof and the beastly buttresses would expose a noble range of columns on each side.—Ever, my dear Lord, yours ever truly,