Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Bart.
Sir Walter Scott, Journal, 8 April-25 May 1828
“April 8.—Learning from
Washington Irving’s
description of Stratford,
that the hall of Sir Thomas Lucy, the
justice who rendered Warwickshire too hot for Shakspeare, was still extant, we went in quest of it.
“Charlecote is in high preservation, and inhabited
by Mr Lucy, descendant of the worshipful
Sir Thomas. The Hall is about three
hundred years old, a brick mansion with a gate-house in advance. It is
surrounded by venerable oaks, realizing the imagery which Shakspeare loved to dwell upon; rich verdant
pastures extend on every side, and numerous herds of deer were reposing in the
shade. All showed that the Lucy family had retained their
‘land and beeves.’ While we were surveying the antlered old hall,
with its painted glass and family pictures, Mr Lucy came
to welcome us in person, and to show the house, with the collection of
paintings, which seems valuable.
“He told me the park from which Shakspeare stole the buck was not that which
surrounds Charlecote, but belonged to a mansion at some distance, where
Sir Thomas Lucy resided at the time
of the trespass. The tradition went that they hid the buck in a barn, part of
which was standing a few years ago, but now totally decayed. This park no
longer belongs to the Lucys. The house bears no marks of
decay, but seems the abode of ease and opulence. There were some fine old
books, and I was told of many more which were not in order. How odd if a folio
Shakspeare should be found amongst them. Our early
breakfast did not permit taking advantage of an excellent repast offered by the
kindness of Mr and Mrs Lucy, the last a
lively Welshwoman. This visit gave me great pleasure; it really brought
Justice Shallow freshly before my
eyes;—the luces ‘which do become an old coat
well,’* were
124 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
not more plainly portrayed in his own armorials in the
hall window, than was his person in my mind’s eye. There is a picture
shown as that of the old Sir Thomas, but Mr Lucy conjectures it represents his son.
There were three descents of the same name of Thomas. The
portrait hath ‘the eye severe, and beard of formal cut,’
which fill up with judicial austerity the otherwise social physiognomy of the
worshipful presence, with his ‘fair round belly, with good capon
lined.’*
“Regent’s Park, April
17.—Made up my journal, which had fallen something behind. In this
phantasmagorial place the objects of the day come and depart like shadows. Went
to Murray’s, where I met Mr Jacob, the great economist. He is proposing
a mode of supporting the poor, by compelling them to labour under a species of
military discipline. I see no objection to it, only it will make a rebellion to
a certainty; and the tribes of Jacob will cut
Jacob’s throat.†
“Canning’s conversion from popular opinions was strangely
brought round. While he was studying in the Temple, and rather entertaining
revolutionary opinions, Godwin sent to
say that he was coming to breakfast with him, to speak on a subject of the
highest importance. Canning knew little of him, but
received his visit, and learned to his astonishment, that in expectation of a
new order of things, the English Jacobins designed to place him,
Canning, at the head of their revolution. He was much
struck, and asked time to think what course he should take—and having thought
the matter over, he went to Mr Pitt, and
made the Anti-Jacobin confession of faith, in which he persevered
* As You Like It, Act I., Scene 7. † I believe Mr
Jacob published at this time some tracts concerning the
Poor Colonies instituted by the King of the Netherlands. |
until ——. Canning
himself mentioned this to Sir W.
Knighton upon occasion of giving a place in the Charter-house of
some ten pounds a-year to Godwin’s
brother. He could scarce do less for one who had offered him the
dictator’s curule chair.
“Dined with Rogers with all my own family, and met Sharp, Lord John
Russell, Jekyll, and
others. The conversation flagged as usual, and jokes were fired like
minute-guns, producing an effect not much less melancholy. A wit should always
have an atmosphere congenial to him, otherwise he will not shine.
“April 18.—Breakfasted at
Hampstead with Joanna Baillie, and found
that gifted person extremely well, and in the display of all her native
knowledge of character and benevolence. I would give as much to have a capital
picture of her as for any portrait in the world. Dined with the Dean of
Chester, Dr Philpotts—
‘Where all above us was a solemn row Of priests and deacons—so were all below.’* |
There were the amiable Bishop of London (Howley), Copplestone,
whom I remember the first man at Oxford, now Bishop of Llandaff, and Dean of St
Paul’s (strongly intelligent), and other dignitaries, of whom I knew
less. It was a very pleasant day—the wigs against the wits for a guinea, in
point of conversation. Anne looked
queer, and much disposed to laugh, at finding herself placed betwixt two
prelates in black petticoats.
“April 19.—Breakfasted with
Sir George Phillips. Had his receipt
against the blossoms being injured by frost. It consists in watering them
plentifully before sunrise. This is like the mode of thawing beef. We
126 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
had a pleasant morning, much the better that Morritt was with us. Dined with Sir Robert Inglis, and met Sir Thomas Acland, my old and kind friend. I
was happy to see him. He may be considered now as the head of the religious
party in the House of Commons, a powerful body which Wilberforce long commanded. It is a difficult
situation; for the adaptation of religious motives to earthly policy is apt
among the infinite delusions of the human heart to be a snare. But I could
confide much in Sir T. Acland’s honour and
integrity. Bishop Bloomfield of Chester,
one of the most learned prelates of the church, also dined.
“April 22.—Sophia left this to take down poor Johnnie to Brighton. I fear—I fear—but we must
hope the best. Anne went with her
sister.
“Lockhart
and I dined with Sotheby, where we met a
large party, the orator of which was that extraordinary man Coleridge. After eating a hearty dinner,
during which he spoke not a word, he began a most learned harangue on the
Samothracian Mysteries, which he regards as affording the germ of all tales
about fairies past, present, and to come. He then diverged to Homer, whose Iliad he considered as a collection of poems by
different authors, at different times, during a century. Morritt, a zealous worshipper of the old bard,
was incensed at a system which would turn him into a polytheist, gave battle
with keenness, and was joined by Sotheby. Mr
Coleridge behaved with the utmost complaisance and temper, but
relaxed not from his exertions. ‘Zounds, I was never so bethumped with
words.’ Morritt’s impatience must have
cost him an extra sixpence worth of snuff.
“April 23.—Dined at
Lady Davy’s with Lord
and Lady Lansdowne and several other fine folks—my keys were sent
to Bramah’s with my desk, so I have not had the
means of putting down matters regularly for several days. But who cares for the
whipp’d cream of London society?
“April 24.—Spent the day in
rectifying a road bill which drew a turnpike road through all the
Darnickers’ cottages, and a good field of my own. I got it put to rights.
I was in some apprehension of being obliged to address the Committee. I did not
fear them, for I suppose they are no wiser or better in their capacity of
legislators than I find them every day at dinner. But I feared for my
reputation. They would have expected something better than the occasion
demanded, or the individual could produce, and there would have been a failure.
We had one or two persons at home in great wretchedness to dinner. I was not
able to make any fight, and the evening went off as heavily as any I ever spent
in the course of my life.
“April 26.—We dined at
Richardson’s with the two
Chief Barons of England* and Scotland,† odd enough, the one being a
Scotsman and the other an Englishman—far the pleasantest day we have had. I
suppose I am partial, but I think the lawyers beat the bishops, and the bishops
beat the wits.
“April 26.—This morning I
went to meet a remarkable man, Mr Boyd of
the house of Boyd, Benfield, &
Co., which broke for a very large sum at the beginning of the war. Benfield went to the devil I believe.
Boyd, a man of very different stamp, went over to
Paris to look after some large claims which his house had
128 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
on the French Government. They were such as, it seems,
they could not disavow, however they might be disposed to do so. But they used
every effort, by foul means and fair, to induce Mr Boyd to
depart. He was reduced to poverty; he was thrown into prison: and the most
flattering prospects were, on the other hand, held out to him if he would
compromise his claims. His answer was uniform. It was the property, he said, of
his creditors, and he would die ere he resigned it. His distresses were so
great, that a subscription was made amongst his Scottish friends, to which I
was a contributor, through the request of poor Will
Erskine. After the peace of Paris the money was restored, and,
faithful to the last, Boyd laid the whole at his
creditors’ disposal; stating, at the same time, that he was penniless
unless they consented to allow him a moderate sum in name of per centage, in
consideration of twenty years of exile, poverty, and danger, all of which evils
he might have escaped by surrendering their rights. Will it be believed, that a
muck-worm was base enough to refuse his consent to this deduction, alleging he
had promised to his father, on his death-bed, never to compromise this debt?
The wretch, however, was overpowered by the execrations of all around him, and
concurred, with others, in setting apart for Mr Boyd a sum
of L.40,000 or L.50,000 out of half a million. This is a man to whom statues
should be erected, and pilgrims should go to see him. He is good looking, but
old and infirm. Bright dark eyes and eyebrows contrast with his snowy hair, and
all his features mark vigour of principle and resolution.
“April 30.—We have Mr Adolphus, and his father, the celebrated lawyer, to breakfast,
and I was greatly delighted with the information of the latter. A barrister
of extended practice, if he has
any talents at all, is the best companion in the world. Dined with Lord Alvanley and met Lord Fitzroy Somerset, Marquis and Marchioness of
Worcester, &c. Lord Alvanley’s
wit made this party very pleasant, as well as the kind reception of my friends
the Misses Arden.
“May 1.—Breakfasted with
Lord and Lady
Francis Gower, and enjoyed the splendid treat of hearing
Mrs Arkwright sing her own music,
which is of the highest order—no forced vagaries of the voice, no caprices of
tone, but all telling upon and increasing the feeling the words require. This
is ‘marrying music to immortal verse.’ Most people place
them on separate maintenance.*
“May 2.—I breakfasted with a
Mr ——, and narrowly escaped Mr Irving the celebrated preacher. The two
ladies of his house seemed devoted to his opinions, and quoted him at every
word. Mr —— himself made some apologies for the Millenium. He is a neat
antiquary, who thinks he ought to have been a man of letters, and that his
genius has been misdirected in
* Among other songs Mrs
Arkwright (see ante, p. 77), delighted Sir Walter with her own set of— “Farewell! Farewell!—the voice you
hear Has left its last soft tone with you, Its next must join the seaward cheer, And shout among the shouting crew,”
&c. | He was sitting by me, at some distance from the lady, and
whispered as she closed, “capital words whose are they?
Byron’s I suppose, but
I don’t remember them.” He was astonished when I
told him that they were his own in the Pirate—he seemed pleased at the
moment—but said next minute—“You have distressed me—if memory
goes, all is up with me, for that was always my strong
point.” |
130 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
turning towards the law. I endeavoured to combat this
idea, which his handsome house and fine family should have checked. Compare his
dwelling, his comforts, with poor Tom
Campbell’s.
“May 5.—Breakfasted with
Haydon, and sat for my head. I hope
this artist is on his legs again. The King
has given him a lift, by buying his clever picture of the Mock Election in the
King’s Bench prison, to which he is adding a second part, representing
the chairing of the member at the moment it was interrupted by the entry of the
guards. Haydon was once a great admirer and companion of
the champions of the Cockney school, and is now disposed to renounce them and
their opinions. To this kind of conversation I did not give much way. A painter
should have nothing to do with politics. He is certainly a clever fellow, but
too enthusiastic, which, however, distress seems to have cured in some degree.
His wife, a pretty woman, looked happy
to see me, and that is something. Yet it was very little I could do to help
them.*
“May 8.—Dined with Mrs Alexander of Ballochmyle: Lord and Lady
Meath, who were kind to us in Ireland, and a Scottish party,
pleasant from having the broad accents and honest thoughts of my native land. A
large circle in the evening. A gentleman came up to me and asked ‘If I
had seen the Casket, a
curious work, the most beautiful, the most highly ornamented,—and then the
editor or editress—a female so interesting,—might he ask a very great
favour?’ and
* Sir Walter had
shortly before been one of the contributors to a subscription for
Mr Haydon. The imprisonment
from which this subscription relieved the artist produced, I need
scarcely say, the picture mentioned in the Diary. |
out he pulled a piece of this
pic-nic. I was really angry, and said for a subscription he might command
me—for a contributor—No. This may be misrepresented, but I care not. Suppose
this patron of the Muses gives five guineas to his distressed lady, he will
think he does a great deal, yet he takes fifty from me with the calmest air in
the world; for the communication is worth that if it be worth any thing. There
is no equalizing in the proposal.
“May 9.—Grounds of farce of the . Lady —— A certain Mrs
Phipps audaciously set up in a fashionable quarter of the town
as a person through whose influence, properly propitiated, favours and
situations of importance might certainly be obtained always for a
consideration. She cheated many people, and maintained the trick for months.
One trick was to get the equipages of Lord
North, and other persons of importance, to halt before her door,
as if their owners were within. With respect to most of them, this was effected
by bribing the drivers. But a gentleman who watched her closely, observed that
Charles J. Fox actually left his
carriage and went into the house, and this more than once. He was then, it must
be noticed, in the Ministry. When Mrs Phipps was blown up,
this circumstance was recollected as deserving explanation, which
Fox readily gave at Brookes’ and elsewhere. It
seems Mrs Phipps had the art to persuade him that she had
the disposal of what was then called a hyæna, that
is, an heiress—an immense Jamaica heiress, in whom she was willing to give or
sell her interest to Charles Fox. Without having perfect
confidence in the obliging proposal, the great statesman thought the thing
worth looking after, and became so earnest in it, that Mrs
Phipps was desirous to back out for fear of discovery.
132 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
With this view she made confession one fine morning,
with many professions of the deepest feelings, that the hyæna had proved a
frail monster, and given birth to a girl or boy—no matter which. Even this did
not make Charles quit chase of the hyæna. He
intimated that if the cash was plenty and certain, the circumstance might be
overlooked. Mrs Phipps had nothing for it but to double
the disgusting dose. ‘The poor child,’ she said,
‘was unfortunately of a mixed colour, somewhat tinged with the
blood of Africa; no doubt Mr Fox was himself very
dark, and the circumstance might not draw attention,’ &c.
&c. This singular anecdote was touched upon by Foote,
and is the cause of introducing the negress into the Cozeners, though no express allusion to Charles
Fox was admitted. Lady —— tells me that, in
her youth, the laugh was universal so soon as the black woman appeared. It is
one of the numerous hits that will be lost to posterity.
“This day, at the request of Sir William Knighton, I sat to Northcote, who is to introduce himself in the
same piece in the act of painting me, like some pictures of the Venetian
school. The artist is an old man, low in stature, and bent with years—fourscore
at least. But the eye is quick and the countenance noble. A pleasant companion,
familiar with recollections of Sir
Joshua, Samuel Johnson,
Burke, Goldsmith, &c. His account of the last confirms all that we
have heard of his oddities.
“May 11.—Another long
sitting to the old Wizard Northcote. He
really resembles an animated mummy. Dined with his
Majesty in a very private party, five or six only being present.
I was received most kindly, as usual. It is impossible to conceive a more
friendly manner than that his Majesty used towards me. I spoke to Sir William Knighton about the dedication of
the
collected novels, and he says
it will be highly well taken.*
“May 17.—A day of busy
idleness. Richardson came and
breakfasted with me, like a good fellow. Then I went to Mr Chantrey. Thereafter, about 12
o’clock, I went to breakfast the second at Lady Shelley’s, where there was a great morning party. A
young lady begged a lock of my hair, which was not worth refusing. I stipulated
for a kiss, which I was permitted to take. From this I went to the Duke of Wellington, who gave me some hints or
rather details. Afterwards I drove out to Chiswick, where I had never been
before. A numerous and gay party were assembled to walk and enjoy the beauties
of that Palladian dome. The place and highly ornamented gardens belonging to it
resemble a picture of Watteau. There is
some affectation in the picture, but in the ensemble the original looked very
well. The Duke of Devonshire received every
one with the best possible manners. The scene was dignified by the presence of
an immense elephant, who, under charge of a groom, wandered up and down, giving
an air of Asiatic pageantry to the entertainment. I was never before sensible
of the dignity which largeness of size and freedom of movement give to this
otherwise very ugly animal. As I was to dine at Holland House, I did not
partake in the magnificent repast which was offered to us, and took myself off
about five o’clock. I contrived to make a demi-toilette at Holland House,
rather than drive all the way to London. Rogers came to the dinner, which was very entertaining.
Lady Holland pressed us to stay all
night, which we did accordingly.
“May 18.—The freshness of
the air, the singing of
134 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
the birds, the beautiful aspect of nature, the size of
the venerable trees, gave me altogether a delightful feeling this morning. It
seemed there was pleasure even in living and breathing without any thing else.
We (i. e. Rogers and I) wandered into a green lane, bordered with fine
trees, which might have been twenty miles from a town. It will be a great pity
when this ancient house must come down and give way to rows and crescents. It
is not that Holland House is fine as a building,—on the contrary it has a
tumble-down look; and although decorated with the bastard Gothic of James I.’s time, the front is heavy. But it
resembles many respectable matrons, who having been absolutely ugly during
youth, acquire by age an air of dignity. But one is chiefly affected by the air
of deep seclusion which is spread around the domain.
“May 19.—Dined by command
with the Duchess of Kent. I was very kindly
recognised by Prince Leopold—and presented
to the little Princess Victoria—I hope
they will change her name—the heir-apparent to the crown as things now stand.
How strange that so large and fine a family as that of his late Majesty should have died off, or decayed into
old age, with so few descendants. Prince George of
Cumberland is, they say, a fine boy about nine years old—a bit
of a Pickle. This little lady is educating with much care, and watched so
closely that no busy maid has a moment to whisper, ‘You are heir of
England.’ I suspect if we could dissect the little heart, we should find
that some pigeon or other bird of the air had carried the matter. She is fair,
like the Royal family—the Duchess herself very pleasing and affable in her
manners. I sat by Mr Spring Rice, a very
agreeable man. There were also Charles
Wynn and his lady—and the
evening, for a court evening, went agreeably
| KENSINGTON PALACE, &c. | 135 |
off. I am commanded for two days by
Prince Leopold, but will send excuses.
“May 24.—This day dined at
Richmond Park with Lord Sidmouth. Before
dinner his Lordship showed me letters which passed between his father,
Dr. Addington, and the great
Lord Chatham. There was much of that
familiar friendship which arises, and must arise, between an invalid, the head
of an invalid family, and their medical adviser, supposing the last to be a
wise and wellbred man. The character of Lord
Chatham’s handwriting is strong and bold, and his
expressions short and manly. There are intimations of his partiality for
William, whose health seems to have been precarious
during boyhood. He talks of William imitating him in all
he did, and calling for ale because his father was recommended to drink it.
‘If I should smoke,’ he said,
‘William would instantly call for a
pipe;’ and, he wisely infers, ‘I must take care what I
do.’ The letters of the late William
Pitt are of great curiosity; but as, like all real letters of
business, they only allude to matters with which his correspondent is well
acquainted, and do not enter into details, they would require an ample
commentary. I hope Lord Sidmouth will supply this, and
have urged it as much as I can. I think, though I hate letters, and abominate
interference, I will write to him on this subject. Here I met my old and much
esteemed friend, Lord Stowell, looking very
frail and even comatose. Quantum
mutatus. He was one of the pleasantest men I ever knew.
“Respecting the letters, I picked up from those of
Pitt that he was always extremely
desirous of peace with France, and even reckoned upon it at a moment when he
ought to have despaired. I suspect this false view of the state of France (for
such it was) which in-
136 | LIFE OF SIR WALTER SCOTT. | |
duced the British Minister to look
for peace when there was no chance of it, damped his ardour in maintaining the
war. He wanted the lofty ideas of his father—you read it in his handwriting,
great statesman as he was. I saw a letter or two of Burke’s, in which there is an epanchement de cœur not visible in those of
Pitt, who writes like a Premier to his colleague.
Burke was under the strange hallucination that his
son, who predeceased him, was a man of greater talents than himself. On the
contrary, he had little talent, and no nerve. On moving some resolutions in
favour of the Catholics, which were ill-received by the House of Commons,
young Burke actually ran away, which
an Orangeman compared to a cross-reading in the newspapers. ‘Yesterday
the Catholic resolutions were moved, &c. but the pistol missing fire,
the villains ran off!!’”
“May 25.—After a morning of
letter-writing, leave-taking, papers destroying, and God knows what trumpery,
Sophia and I set out for Hampton
Court, carrying with us the following lions and lionesses—Samuel Rogers, Tom
Moore, Wordsworth, with
wife and daughter. “We were very kindly and properly received by
Walter and his wife, and had a very pleasant day. At parting
Rogers gave me a gold-mounted pair of glasses, which I
will not part with in a hurry. I really like S. R., and
have always found him most friendly.”
Sir Thomas Dyke Acland, tenth baronet (1787-1871)
Tory politician and philanthropist, educated at Harrow and Christ Church, Oxford; he was
MP for Devon (1812-18, 1820-31) and North Devon (1837-57). He was a founder of Grillion's
Club and active in religious causes.
Anthony Addington (1713-1790)
English physician educated at Winchester and Trinity College, Oxford; William Pitt was
his patient and friend. He was the father of Henry Addington, the prime minister
John Adolphus (1768-1845)
English barrister; he was author of
History of England from the
Accession of George III to the Conclusion of Peace in 1783 (1802). He was a
political associate of Henry Addington and a writer for the
British
Critic.
John Leycester Adolphus (1794-1862)
The son of the historian; educated at Merchant Taylors' School and St John's College,
Oxford, he was a barrister of the Inner Temple. In
Letters to Richard
Heber (1821) he demonstrated that the Waverley Novels were written by Walter
Scott.
Sir William Alexander (1755-1842)
Educated at the Middle Temple, he was King's Counsel (1800) and Lord Chief Baron of the
Exchequer (1824-31).
William Arden, second baron Alvanley (1789-1849)
The son of Sir Richard Pepper Arden, first Baron Alvanley; he was a friend of Beau
Brummell with a reputation as a wit and a spendthrift.
Joanna Baillie (1762-1851)
Scottish poet and dramatist whose
Plays on the Passions
(1798-1812) were much admired, especially the gothic
De Montfort,
produced at Drury Lane in 1800.
Paul Benfield (1741-1810)
Indian nabob who entered into an unfortunate banking partnership with Walter Boyd; he
died a pauper interned in France during the war.
Walter Boyd (1753-1837)
Scottish-born financier who operated out of Paris in partnership with Sir Robert Herries;
he was MP for Shaftesbury (1796-1802) and Lymington (1823-30).
Edmund Burke (1729-1797)
Irish politician and opposition leader in Parliament, author of
On the
Sublime and Beautiful (1757) and
Reflections on the Revolution
in France (1790).
Richard Burke (1758-1794)
The son of Edmund Burke; he was educated at Westminster and was briefly MP for Malton
(1794) before his early death.
Thomas Campbell (1777-1844)
Scottish poet and man of letters; author of
The Pleasures of Hope
(1799),
Gertrude of Wyoming (1808) and lyric odes. He edited the
New Monthly Magazine (1821-30).
George Canning (1770-1827)
Tory statesman; he was foreign minister (1807-1809) and prime minister (1827); a
supporter of Greek independence and Catholic emancipation.
Sir Francis Leggatt Chantrey (1781-1841)
English sculptor who worked as a statuary from 1804; he employed the poet Allan
Cunningham in his studio from 1814. He was knighted in 1835.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834)
English poet and philosopher who projected
Lyrical Ballads (1798)
with William Wordsworth; author of
Biographia Literaria (1817),
On the Constitution of the Church and State (1829) and other
works.
Edward Copleston, bishop of Llandaff (1776-1849)
Educated at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, he was a fellow of Oriel, Oxford Professor of
Poetry (1802-12), dean of St. Paul's (1827-1849), and bishop of Llandaff (1827-49); he
published
Three Replies to the Calumnies of the Edinburgh Review
(1810-11).
George Crabbe (1754-1832)
English poet renowned for his couplet verse and gloomy depictions of country persons and
places; author of the
The Village (1783),
The
Parish Register (1807),
The Borough (1810), and
Tales of the Hall (1819).
Lady Jane Davy [née Kerr] (1780-1855)
Society hostess who in 1798 married Shuckburgh Ashby Apreece (d. 1807) and Humphry Davy
in 1812.
Francis Egerton, first earl of Ellesmere (1800-1857)
Poet, statesman, and Tory MP; a younger son the second marquess of Stafford, he was
educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, was chief secretary for Ireland (1828-30), and
translated Goethe and Schiller and contributed articles to the
Quarterly
Review.
William Erskine, Lord Kinneder (1768-1822)
The son of an episcopal clergyman of the same name, he was a Scottish advocate and a
close friend and literary advisor to Sir Walter Scott.
Charles James Fox (1749-1806)
Whig statesman and the leader of the Whig opposition in Parliament after his falling-out
with Edmund Burke.
Elizabeth Fox, Lady Holland [née Vassall] (1771 c.-1845)
In 1797 married Henry Richard Fox, Lord Holland, following her divorce from Sir Godfrey
Webster; as mistress of Holland House she became a pillar of Whig society.
King George V of Hanover (1819-1878)
The son of Ernest Augustus, duke of Cumberland; blinded in 1833, he succeeded his father
in November 1851.
Nathaniel Godwin (1768-1846)
The younger brother of William Godwin who in 1827 obtained a place for him as a poor
brother of the Charterhouse. He had been employed as a sailor and as a servant.
William Godwin (1756-1836)
English novelist and political philosopher; author of
An Inquiry
concerning the Principles of Political Justice (1793) and
Caleb
Williams (1794); in 1797 he married Mary Wollstonecraft.
Oliver Goldsmith (1728 c.-1774)
Irish miscellaneous writer; his works include
The Vicar of
Wakefield (1766),
The Deserted Village (1770), and
She Stoops to Conquer (1773).
Benjamin Robert Haydon (1786-1846)
English historical painter and diarist who recorded anecdotes of romantic writers and the
physiognomy of several in his paintings.
Homer (850 BC fl.)
Poet of the
Iliad and
Odyssey.
William Howley, archbishop of Canterbury (1766-1848)
Educated at Winchester and New College, Oxford, he was regius professor of Divinity
(1809-13), bishop of London (1813-28), and archbishop of Canterbury (1828-48).
Sir Robert Harry Inglis, second baronet (1786-1855)
The son of Sir Hugh Inglis, educated at Winchester, Christ Church, Oxford, and Lincoln's
Inn; he was a Tory MP for Dundalk (1824-26), Ripon (1828-29), and Oxford University
(1829-54), and president of the Literary Club.
Edward Irving (1792-1834)
Popular Presbyterian preacher in London; he was a friend of Coleridge and author of
The Oracles of God and the Judgement to Come (1823).
William Jacob (1762 c.-1851)
English traveler, politician, and economist; he was MP for Westbury (1806-07) and Rye
(1808-12), contributed to the
Quarterly Review, and was treasurer
for the Royal Society of Literature (1832-38).
Joseph Jekyll (1754-1837)
Wit, politician, and barrister; he was Whig MP for Calne (1787-1816) and wrote for the
Morning Chronicle and
Evening
Statesman.
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
English man of letters, among many other works he edited
A Dictionary
of the English Language (1755) and Shakespeare (1765), and wrote
Lives of the Poets (1779-81).
Leopold I King of Belgium (1790-1865)
The son of Prince Francis Ferdinand of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld; after serving in the Russian
army he married Princess Charlotte in May 1816; in 1831 he was inaugurated as the first
king of the Belgians.
John Gibson Lockhart (1794-1854)
Editor of the
Quarterly Review (1825-1853); son-in-law of Walter
Scott and author of the
Life of Scott 5 vols (1838).
John Hugh Lockhart (1821-1831)
The first child of John Gibson Lockhart and his wife Sophia, for whom Sir Walter Scott
wrote
Tales of a Grandfather (1828-1831).
George Lucy (1798-1845)
Of Charlecote Park, educated at Harrow and Oxford, he was a Tory MP for Fowey (1818-19,
1820-30) and high sheriff of Warwickshire (1831).
Mary Elizabeth Lucy (1803-1889)
The daughter of Sir John Williams, baronet; in 1823 she married George Lucy; she
published
Biography of the Lucy family, of Charlecote Park (1862).
Sir Walter Scott described her as “a lively Welshwoman.”
Thomas Lucy (1532 c.-1600)
The Warwickshire gentleman who supposedly accused Shakespeare of deer-stealing and was
pilloried as Justice Shallow.
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
James Northcote (1746-1831)
English portrait-painter and writer who exhibited at the Royal Academy; he wrote a
Life of Titian (1830).
Sir George Philips, first baronet (1766-1847)
Textile magnate and Whig MP; in addition to his mills in Staffordshire and Lancashire he
was a trading partner with Richard “Conversation” Sharp. He was created baronet in
1828.
Henry Phillpotts, bishop of Exeter (1778-1869)
High-church Tory clergyman and controversialist opposed to Catholic emancipation; he was
dean of Chester (1828) and bishop of Exeter (1830).
William Pitt the younger (1759-1806)
The second son of William Pitt, earl of Chatham (1708-1778); he was Tory prime minister
1783-1801.
Dora Quillinan [née Wordsworth] (1804-1847)
The daughter of William Wordsworth who in 1841 married the poet Edward Quillinan despite
her father's concerns about his debts.
Thomas Spring Rice, first Baron Monteagle (1790-1866)
The son of Stephen Edward of Limerick; he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and
was MP for Limerick City (1820-32) and Cambridge borough (1832-39). He was chancellor of
the exchequer (1835-39) and contributed to the
Edinburgh
Review.
John Richardson of Kirklands (1780-1864)
Scottish lawyer and parliamentary solicitor in London from 1806; he was Thomas Campbell's
legal advisor and a friend of Sir Walter Scott.
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
Anne Scott (1803-1833)
Walter Scott's younger daughter who cared for him in his old age and died
unmarried.
Lady Jane Scott [née Jobson] (1801 c.-1877)
The daughter of William Jobson of Lochore; in 1825 she married Sir Walter Scott's eldest
son, Walter.
Sir Walter Scott, second baronet (1801-1847)
The elder son and heir of Sir Walter Scott; he was cornet in the 18th Hussars (1816),
captain (1825), lieut.-col. (1839). In the words of Maria Edgeworth, he was
“excessively shy, very handsome, not at all literary.”
William Scott, first baron Stowell (1745-1836)
English lawyer and friend of Dr. Johnson; he was MP for Oxford University (1801-21) and
judge of the high court of Admiralty (1798-1828). He was the elder brother of Lord
Eldon.
Richard Sharp [Conversation Sharp] (1759-1835)
English merchant, Whig MP, and member of the Holland House set; he published
Letters and Essays in Poetry and Prose (1834).
Lady Frances Shelley [née Winckley] (1787-1873)
The daughter of Thomas Winckley; in 1807 she married Sir John Shelley, sixth baronet. Sir
Walter Scott admired her skills as a harpist and a huntress; her
Diary was published in 1912.
Sir Samuel Shepherd (1760-1840)
English barrister educated at Merchant Taylors' School and the Inner Temple; he was
king's serjeant (1796), solicitor-general (1813), attorney-general (1817) and a friend of
Sir Walter Scott.
Henry Somerset, seventh duke of Beaufort (1792-1853)
The son of the sixth duke of Beaufort (d. 1835); he was educated at Westminster and
Christ Church, Oxford; an affair with Harriette Wilson was interrupted by service in the
Peninsular War; he was Tory MP for Monmouth Boroughs (1813-32) and an avid
sportsman.
William Sotheby (1757-1833)
English man of letters; after Harrow he joined the dragoons, married well, and published
Poems (1790) and became a prolific poet and translator,
prominent in literary society.
Edward Stanley, first Baron Monteagle (1460 c.-1523)
The son of Thomas Stanley, first earl of Derby; fighting under Thomas Howard, earl of
Surrey, he was instrumental in the English victory at Flodden Field.
Lady Louisa Stuart (1757-1851)
The youngest child of John Stuart, third earl of Bute; she corresponded with Sir Walter
Scott. Several volumes of her writings and memoirs were published after her death.
Victoria Mary Louise, duchess of Kent (1786-1861)
The daughter of Francis, duke of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld, in 1803 she married Emich Charles,
prince of Leiningen, and in 1818 the Duke of Kent. She was the mother of Queen
Victoria
Antoine Watteau (1684-1721)
French Rococo painter renowned for his bucolic scenes.
William Wilberforce (1759-1833)
British statesman, evangelical Christian, and humanitarian who worked for the abolition
of slavery. He was an MP for Yorkshire aligned with Fox and Sheridan.
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
Charles Watkin Williams Wynn (1775-1850)
The son of Sir Watkin Williams Wynn, fourth baronet; educated at Westminster and Christ
Church, Oxford, Robert Southey's friend and benefactor was a Whig MP for Old Sarum (1797)
and Montgomeryshire (1799-1850). He was president of the Board of Control (1822-28).
Mary Wynn [née Cunliffe] (1785 c.-1838)
The daughter of Sir Foster Cunliffe, third baronet; in 1806 she married Charles Watkin
Williams-Wynn.