The “Pope” of Holland House
John Whishaw to Elizabeth Smith, 2 February 1831
Feb. 2, 1831.
I am much obliged to you for your kind letter, giving me a
tolerably good account of yourself, for I had been apprehensive that your health
might have suffered from the disturbed state of the country. All such alarms are
now happily abated, and gradually subsiding. The Special Commissions appear to have
done their duty, and I hope you will think that the Government has acted wisely and
properly in complying, to a certain extent, with the humane wishes of the public,
and tempering justice with mercy. Their task in this, as in every other respect,
has been very difficult, but they have still greater diffi-
1 Lord Grey
was now the head of a Ministry composed of Whigs and Canningites. |
254 |
|
Reform |
culties to encounter. To-morrow they are again to
meet Parliament, and in a very short time to produce their plans of Reform in the
representation; as also in the administration of justice, especially in the Court
of Chancery. The former will be brought forward by Lord
Althorp, the latter by Lord
Brougham, who, calling the best assistance to his power, has devoted
the whole of his time since he became Chancellor, consistent with his other duties,
in framing and digesting an excellent plan of regulations for his Court. He will, I
trust, carry into effect in a few months those improvements which had been vainly
expected from his predecessors, Lords Eldon and
Lyndhurst, the former of whom held the seals
a quarter of a century, and the latter near four years!
I hope that these things will have weight with a House of Commons
naturally averse to the present Ministers and their measures, but who cannot fail
to be influenced by their own fears, the feelings of the public, and the spirit of
the times. By the aid of these motives, operating on the independent part of the
House, I trust that our friends will prevail over a teasing and insidious
opposition on the part of Mr. Peel and his
adherents, which they will encounter at every step of their proceedings. It is most
satisfactory to know that their plans of reform have had no dissentient voice in
the Cabinet, and that upon being laid before the King a few days since at Brighton,
they received his entire approbation.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
John Singleton Copley, baron Lyndhurst (1772-1863)
The son of the American painter; he did legal work for John Murray before succeeding Lord
Eldon as lord chancellor (1827-30, 1834-35, 1841-46); a skilled lawyer, he was also a
political chameleon.
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
John Scott, first earl of Eldon (1751-1838)
Lord chancellor (1801-27); he was legal counsel to the Prince of Wales and an active
opponent of the Reform Bill.
Frederick Spencer, fourth earl Spencer (1798-1857)
The younger son of George Spencer, the second earl; he was educated at Eton and served as
a naval captain and as Whig MP for Worcestershire (1831-1832) and Midhurst (1832-1834,
1837-1841).