The “Pope” of Holland House
Chapter XII: 1833-35
CHAPTER XII
1833 to 1835
Grote and the Bank Charter—Society at Lansdowne and Holland
Houses—Miss Aikin’s Book—The Irish Church
Temporalities Bill—Lord Grey—The Factory
Bill—Politics—Corporations—The Government—Archbishop
Whately—Swedenborg—Scarlett—Lines
of Walter Scott.
From Mr. Whishaw to Charles and
Henry Romilly.
April 23, 1833.
GROTE acted a very
manly part in opposing the Bank of England last night,1
which, as a banker, must have been contrary to his wishes and interests. Abercromby considers him as the only rising man of
that party, and one of the most rising in the whole House. I conjecture that
Edward voted with him and John in the
majority. The
1 Mr.
Attwood, M.P. for Whitehaven, brought forward a motion for a
committee to inquire into the state of general distress—how far the
same had been occasioned by the operation of our present monetary system.
Lord Althorp moved an amendment,
and Mr. Grote rose immediately to
second it. In the division that the words proposed by Mr.
Attwood should stand, Grote, John Romilly, and Edward Romilly all voted with the noes in the majority.
|
260 |
|
Lansdowne House |
Bentham school, with
Ricardo and
Mill, are lovers of cheap currency, and in my opinion too
favourable to paper.
June, 1833.
On Friday I dined at Lansdowne House, where I met Malthus, Mr.
Fazackerly, and the youngest
Villiers1 (an evident aspirant for
Ministerial favours) and Dr. Holland. The
conversation turned chiefly upon the scientific gala to be held at Cambridge next
week, which it is generally thought will be overdone, and made too elaborate and
expensive. In addition to philosophical papers and lectures, there are to be great
dinners in the College halls, besides breakfasts, and evening parties, concerts,
&c. I have been urged to go, but considering the doubtful nature of the
entertainment, the certain heat and bustle, and the probable ennui, I have steadily declined to be of the party. In the evening I
talked with Lord Lansdowne about politics, and
could see that he was very anxious respecting the conduct of the Tory Lords. On
Saturday I went to Holland House and met a small but agreeable party. Lord Carlisle and his youngest son, Lord Duncannon,2 and
Dr. Woolryche, formerly an army
physician, afterwards medical attendant to the Duke of
Bedford, and lately colleague of Leonard
Horner, as one of the Factory
1 Right Hon.
Charles Villiers. 2 John William
Ponsonby, Lord Duncannon, afterwards
4th Earl of Bessborough, b. 1781, d. 1847, M.P.
for Kilkenny, 1826-1831; acted as Chief Whip of the Whig party. In 1830
helped to prepare the Reform Bill. Was called to the House of Lords as
Lord Duncannon, 1834; retired from office when
Peel became Prime Minister. Was
Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland 1844-46. |
261 |
|
Holland House |
Commissioners. He is a pleasing, sensible
man, and gave a most satisfactory account of the state of the manufactures at
Birmingham, and in the clothing district of Wiltshire, Somersetshire, and
Gloucestershire, and of the judicious and humane treatment of the children. He is
quite clear that any attempt at legislating on the subject would be very
mischievous.
Sunday morning was very wet, but the weather cleared up, and I
had enjoyment of the garden, which was fresh, fragrant, and delicious. At dinner we
had a splendid party, Lord and Lady Grey, the Chancellor,1 Duke of Richmond, Lord John
Russell, Lord and Lady Stafford, Lady
Coventry and Miss Fox,
John Murray of Edinburgh, and Admiral Adam.2 All went off
very well, and the talk was of indifferent and insignificant subjects. Politics
were a good deal avoided, but it was clear that they were uneasy about the prospect
of the debate in the Lords this evening, in which they expect to be beaten.
Altogether I found my visit very agreeable—more so, indeed,
than I quite expected; but these occasional glimpses of high political and
fashionable life are pleasant and interesting to one in my humble situation.
There was one drawback to my pleasure, the finding poor Lady Holland much altered in her looks, and I fear
certainly ill, but thinking herself much worse than she is. Lord Holland, except the infirmity of his limbs, I
never saw better, or more active or entertaining.
I have received from my friend, Miss
Aikin, her
262 |
|
Church Temporalities Bill |
new book, “
The Memoirs of Charles I.,”
in two pretty thick volumes. From what I have seen, I expect it to be very
successful, but I will give you my opinion hereafter.
Tuesday, July 16, 1833.
At this critical period it will be interesting to you to know
that the aspect of public affairs has changed in some degree ever since you left
London. The Tories, it is understood, have taken fright. They have ascertained that
the Irish Church Bill is deemed of greater importance by the public (at least as a
beginning of ecclesiastical reform) than they supposed, that the House of Commons
would stand by the present Ministers, and that a dissolution of Parliament, if it
would diminish the Whig Members, would increase the Radicals in a much greater
proportion. Such is the opinion of a certain number of the Conservative Lords, who
are afraid of going to extremities, and it seems to be settled that they will
suffer the Bill to be read a second time. Strong words will be used in the
Committee, and attempts will be made, with some success, to mangle and mutilate the
principal provisions, but the probability is at present that, in some shape or
other, the Bill will finally pass. So far all is well, but now comes the
unfortunate part of the story. The Ministers, who had encouraged Sir John Wrottesley to move for a call of the House,
desert him when he makes his motion, giving way to the suggestion of Peel that the Peers ought not to be menaced; and by
this act of political cowardice, amounting almost to treachery, they disgust many
263 |
|
Church Temporalities Bill |
of their friends and the
great body of Liberals, who had determined, somewhat reluctantly, to give them
their support. It was a true sequel to their giving up the 147th clause. The
consequence was that several of their most respectable adherents,
Abercromby,
Lord
Ebrington,
Lord Duncannon (a
Minister), and others, thought themselves bound as men of honour to support
Wrottesley in his motion, and voted with the minority. In
this was
Kennedy1
whom I saw at Abercromby’s after the vote.
I have had no opportunity of seeing people this morning, but have
no doubt that the general impression is very unfavourable to Ministers.
Of those members whom I saw last night, Abercromby was the most indignant, and with good reason, for he had
taken great pains to conciliate the Liberals, and to induce them to join in a
resolution favourable to the present Government in the event of the Irish Church
Bill being thrown out.2 In that case he
(Abercromby) had undertaken to make the motion, which was
to have been seconded
1 Right Hon. T.
Kennedy, of Dalquhharran. 2 The Bill was the “Church Temporalities
(Ireland) Bill,” which Earl Grey
moved the second reading of on July 17, 1833. It was read a second time on
July 19th and carried by 157 votes to 98 votes. Sir John
Wrottesley on July 15th brought forward a motion for a call
of the House of Commons on July 18th. It was defeated by 125 votes to 160,
Abercromby, Lords Duncannon and Ebrington, Kennedy,
Lieut.-Col. Grey and Sir G. Grey, and C. Tennyson voting in the minority. The 147th clause in the “Church Temporalities
(Ireland) Bill,” which placed the surplus fund at the disposal of
Parliament, was struck out by 280 votes to 149 (June 21, 1833). |
264 |
|
Church Temporalities Bill |
by
Grote. But under the present circumstance he seems to have
determined against giving them any support, and has signified as much to
Lord Althorp. Knowing what we do of the opinion
entertained of the former backslidings of the Ministers by
Abercromby, and the Radicals, one cannot be surprised at
the sacrifice of opinion, which they were prepared to make (and, as I think, very
properly) to defeat a Tory Administration. But in proportion to the intended
sacrifice must be their present resentment.
On the whole, however, it seems as if the Ministers may not
improbably maintain a frail and tottering existence; but if they survive till the
next session, they will meet a formidable and probably fatal Opposition.
Friday, July 19, 1833.
You will be glad to hear that the little storm of which I told
you in my last note is almost entirely blown over; and the Ministers appear to be
reinstated in their former position. Such are the changes and chances of political
life! The members of the Government are so much at cross purposes with each other
that Lord Grey openly disapproves of what was
done by Lords Althorp and Stanley on Monday evening, and praises Lord Duncannon, Kennedy, &c., for voting against them. Of course, therefore,
any tender of resignation1 is entirely out of the question.
It is to be observed that his lordship’s son, Charles Grey, voted in the minority.
There seems to be no doubt that the Irish Church
265 |
|
Lord Grey |
Bill will obtain a second reading in the Lords,
and will probably pass without any material alteration in the Committee. The Tories
are happily frightened and divided among themselves; and the present Ministers will
owe their continuance in office not to their own skill or popularity, but to the
dissensions of their opponents. There seems, indeed, good reason to believe that
the latter, upon mustering their forces, find it impracticable, as they did last
year, to form a Government that has any chance of standing.
Peel, their best hand, keeps quite aloof from them,
and is the object of their violent abuse. There are, indeed, vague rumours of
negotiation between him and the present Cabinet for a junction; but so many
difficulties stand in the way of such an arrangement that I cannot yet give it any
credit. It is more probable (what is asserted by some) that the Administration will
be remodelled after the present Session, and that
Lord
Grey will be succeeded by
Lord
Brougham as Premier. Of this I can say nothing. There are obvious
reasons for the retirement of Lord Grey, though he has just
distinguished himself by a very good speech on the Church Bill, and there is no one
in the Cabinet who has sufficient vigour to supply his place, except the
Chancellor. Lord Althorp might have been thought of last year;
but he has been greatly damaged during the Session, and seems to be quite worn out
and exhausted. Yet he has done a great deal by his good sense and spirit of
conciliation; and Stanley as ministerial leader of the Commons
would encounter a violent opposition. The Ministers have gained a great additional
triumph last night by
266 |
|
Politics |
their majority on the
Factory Bill,
1 which has exceeded their expectation, so
that after having been in despair at the beginning of the week, they are now much
elated, and treat the Radicals with their accustomed disdain.
Tuesday, July 23, 1833.
Nothing decisive has occurred in the political world since my
last note to you. The storm raised by the Lords has not yet subsided; but I am
inclined to think that the Ministers, with their usual good fortune, will weather
it in the end. They have been far from confident, however; and when I was at
Holland House two days ago, all was doubt and anxiety as to the result of the
contest. The Opposition, too, have been very undecided, and have had their hot and
cold fits. A certain number of them are bent upon throwing out the Bill,2 and endeavouring to form a new Government at all hazards;
but their zeal is happily tempered by the prudence or pusillanimity of their
associates, especially Peel, who keeps aloof,
and will not embark in the adventure of a Tory Administration.
There is reason to believe that the King, though not violently attached to the present Ministers,
thinks it his safest policy to adhere to them, and is very averse to dissolving the
Parliament, which might be the necessary consequence of the change.
I told you, I think, of the Commission for Inquiry into
Corporations, in which so many of our friends
1 The division on the Factories Regulations Bill
was carried by Ministers by 238 votes to 93. 2 The Irish Church Bill. |
267 |
|
Corporations |
are engaged.
1
Whatever may have been said of the indecision and feebleness of the Government in
many other of their measures, this surely is a very
radical
proceeding.
Corporations are naturally the strongholds of intolerance,
corruption, and Toryism; and the inquiries into them now intended (considering the
persons by whom they are to be conducted) cannot fail of producing very important
efforts. Next to the Reform Bill itself, I consider it as the most important
measure of Lord Grey’s Government.
July 27, 1833.
The newspapers will tell almost all that can be said upon
politics since I last wrote to you. The Ministers have been more frightened than
hurt, for they fully expected during the last fortnight to be out of office before
this time. Such was the impression I received at Holland House last week, when all
seemed on their part to be doubt and anxiety; and their opinion is confirmed by
Mr. Rogers, who says that they were in
great alarm, and that their apprehensions were marked by increasing affability and
attention to old friends!
Their danger, certainly, was much less than they imagined; and
the bystanders, as you may judge from my former notes, were more correct in their
opinions. Still it must be admitted that the Ministers hold their
1 The names of the Commissioners of Inquiry for
England and Wales were John
Blackburne, Sir Francis
Palgrave, George Long,
Sir Fortunatus Dwarris,
S. A. Rumball, G. H. Wilkinson, T. J. Hogg, Peregrine Bingham, David
Jardine, R.
Whitcombe, John Elliot
Drinkwater, Edward John
Gambier, T. F. Ellis,
James Booth, Henry Roscoe, Charles Austin, Edward
Rushton, Alexander
Cockburn, John
Buckle, Daniel Maude;
Secretary, Joseph Parkes. |
268 |
|
The Duke of Wellington |
offices by a most frail and
precarious tenure; and several of the late votes of the House of Commons show that
there are adverse elements in that quarter, and that it is chiefly by the fear of
what may be effected by the Lords that the majority of the House is kept right.
There is reason also to believe that the King, though not personally attached to
the present Ministers, and repenting probably of Reform, is still convinced that
any material change would be dangerous, and is judiciously averse to anything which
might lead to the dissolution of Parliament.
July 31, 1833.
The Church Bill, you see, has passed by a great majority, owing
to the Duke of Wellington and his immediate
followers partly withdrawing and partly voting for the Bill. The Duke seems, in
fact, to hold the balance, and to possess the power of negativing any Government
measure. He is expected on other occasions to rejoin the ultra Tories, and throw
out some important Bills before the end of the Session. Meanwhile the Ministers
continue to totter on, and seem likely to maintain a frail and feverish existence
for some six or eight months longer, when, if they do not change their course, they
will encounter a much more serious opposition than they have hitherto experienced.
From Mr. Whishaw to Henry Romilly.
Aug. 2, 1833.
Charles will give you our general view of
politics, in which there is a great agreement between your
269 |
|
Lord Grey’s Administration |
brothers and me. From personal feelings
and ancient habits, I am perhaps more attached to the present Administration than
they are; though I am not blind to the errors into which they have fallen. But
their principles in the main are good, and their continuance in office for the
present is essential to the tranquillity and well-being of the country. I hope you
agree with me as to the importance of their late Commission of Inquiry into
Municipal Corporations, and other great measures in train. It is melancholy to
think that, with such measures in view, their feebleness and vacillation are such
as render their existence very doubtful and precarious. I trust, however, that they
may still last for some time longer.
From Mr. Whishaw to Charles Romilly.
July 14, 1835.
The party at Mr. Spring
Rice’s yesterday was large and miscellaneous. The Archbishop of Dublin, Lord Kerry, Sir Geo.
Philips, Senior, Peacock, the
tutor of Trinity, Babbage, Lieut. Drummond, Macculloch,
and two or three others.
The Archbishop of Dublin (Whately) is, as you know, a singular person, with much
out-of-the-way knowledge which he produces “in season and out of
season,” one of those whom it is always pleasant to meet. Yesterday
he chose to talk about metaphysics, on which he was neither satisfactory nor
amusing. Upon mention being made of Emanuel
Swedenborg, the founder of the New Jerusalem sect, he observed that
he was a man of some merit as a Professor of
270 |
|
Archbishop Whately |
some Swedish University, and composed some good
philosophical treatises, and that if he had died under sixty he would never have
been heard of; but that after attaining that age he became a “dreamer of
dreams,” and published works in his dotage so eminently nonsensical
as to procure him a never-dying reputation in the Christian world.
In telling you of my interview with my old friend Scarlett1 yesterday morning,
and of his pleasant and affecting allusions to our intercourse of former times, I
ought to have repeated a favourite passage from Scott’s “Lady of the
Lake,” in the vision at the end (if I recollect) of the first
canto:—
“Again return’d the scenes of youth,
Of confident, undoubting truth,
Again his soul he interchanged
With friends whose hearts were long estranged.
|
They come in dim procession led
The cold, the faithless, and the dead,
As warm each hand, each brow as gay,
As if they parted yesterday.”
|
I daresay you will agree as to the merit of these lines, but
their beauty cannot be fully felt except in advanced life.
1 Sir James
Scarlett—afterwards first Lord Abinger—had been originally a Whig,
but eventually became a Tory.
|
James Abercromby, first baron Dunfermline (1776-1858)
The son of Lt.-Gen Sir Ralph Abercromby; he was MP for Midhurst (1807), Calne (1812-30)
and Edinburgh (1832), judge-advocate general (1827) and speaker of the House of Commons
(1835-39); he was raised to the peerage in 1839.
Sir Charles Adam (1780-1853)
The second son of William Adam (1751–1839), of Blair-Adam; he was an MP and a naval
captain in the Napoleonic wars and first naval lord (1834-41).
Lucy Aikin (1781-1864)
English biographer and historian, the daughter of Dr. John Aikin and niece of Anna
Letitia Barbauld, whose works she edited (1825). She published in the
Literary Gazette.
Matthias Attwood (1779-1851)
Birmingham banker and economist; he was a Tory MP for Fowey (1819), Callington (1820-30),
Boroughbridge (1830-32), and Whitehaven (1832-47).
Charles Austin (1799-1874)
Educated at Bury St Edmunds and Jesus College, Cambridge, he was a wit and influential
Benthamite lawyer and conversationalist. He was the brother-in-law of the translator Sarah
Austin.
Charles Babbage (1791-1871)
Cambridge-educated mathematician and computer pioneer, in which capacity in 1843 he
published a paper in collaboration with Byron's daughter, Ada Augusta, countess of
Lovelace.
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
The founder of Utilitarianism; author of
Principles of Morals and
Legislation (1789).
John Elliot Drinkwater Bethune (1801-1851)
The son of John Drinkwater (d. 1844); educated at Westminster School, Trinity College,
Cambridge, and the Middle Temple, he was appointed a member of the supreme council of India
(1848).
Peregrine Bingham (1788-1864)
Educated at Winchester College, Magdalen College, Oxford, and the Middle Temple, he was a
lawyer, police magistrate, and associate of Nassau Senior and Jeremy Bentham.
John Ireland Blackburne (1783-1874)
Of Hale Hall, Lancashire; he was educated at Oxford and was a Conservative MP for Newton
(1807-18) and Warrington (1835-47). He was a strong defender of the established
church.
James Booth (1796 c.-1880)
Educated at St John's College, Cambridge, he was a utilitarian and counsel to the speaker
of Parliament.
Henry Peter Brougham, first baron Brougham and Vaux (1778-1868)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was a founder of the
Edinburgh
Review in which he chastised Byron's
Hours of Idleness; he
defended Queen Caroline in her trial for adultery (1820), established the London University
(1828), and was appointed lord chancellor (1830).
John Buckle (1801 c.-1891)
The son of John Buckle of London; educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was recorder
of Worcester (1836-65).
Thomas Drummond (1797-1840)
Educated at Edinburgh University, he was an inventor of scientific instruments, chairman
of the Parliamentary Boundary Commission (1831), and under-secretary of Ireland
(1835).
Sir Fortunatus William Lilley Dwarris (1786-1860)
Born in Jamaica and educated at Rugby and University College, Oxford, he was called to
the bar from the Middle Temple and published on law.
Thomas Flower Ellis (1796-1861)
Educated at Hackney and Trinity College, Cambridge, he pursued a legal career, wrote for
the
Edinburgh Review, and was a friend and biographer of T. B.
Macaulay.
John Nicholas Fazakerly (1787-1852)
Educated at Eton, Christ Church, Oxford, and Edinburgh, he was a member of the
Speculative Society, Edinburgh (1807) and a Whig MP for Lincoln (1812-18, 1820-26), Great
Grimsby (1818-20), Tavistock (1820), and Peterborough (1830-41).
Hon. Caroline Fox (1767-1845)
The daughter of Stephen Fox, second Baron Holland of Foxley and niece of Charles James
Fox. Jeremy Bentham was among her admirers.
Elizabeth Fox, Lady Holland [née Vassall] (1771 c.-1845)
In 1797 married Henry Richard Fox, Lord Holland, following her divorce from Sir Godfrey
Webster; as mistress of Holland House she became a pillar of Whig society.
Henry Richard Fox, third baron Holland (1773-1840)
Whig politician and literary patron; Holland House was for many years the meeting place
for reform-minded politicians and writers. He also published translations from the Spanish
and Italian;
Memoirs of the Whig Party was published in 1852.
Sir Edward John Gambier (1794-1879)
The nephew of Admiral James Gambier, he was educated at Eton, Trinity College, Cambridge,
and Lincoln's Inn before becoming a judge in India (1836).
Charles Grey, second earl Grey (1764-1845)
Whig statesman and lover of the Duchess of Devonshire; the second son of the first earl
(d. 1807), he was prime minister (1831-34).
Charles Grey (1804-1870)
The second son of Earl Grey; he was MP for High Wycombe (1831-37) and private secretary
to his father (1830-34), Prince Albert (1849-61) and Queen Victoria (1861-70).
Sir George Grey, second baronet (1799-1882)
The nephew of Earl Grey; educated at Oriel College, Oxford, he was a Whig MP for
Devonshire (1832-47), North Northumberland (1847-52), and Morpeth (1853-74). He was home
secretary (1846-52, 1855-58).
George Grote (1794-1871)
English historian, a member of Bentham's circle and writer for the
Westminster Review; he was a founder of London University, of which he was
president in 1868, and MP for London (1832-41).
Thomas Jefferson Hogg (1792-1862)
English barrister and man of letters; after befriending Shelley at Oxford and being
expelled with him he pursued a legal career in London, publishing his
Life of Shelley in 1858.
Sir Henry Holland, first baronet (1788-1873)
English physician and frequenter of Holland House, the author of
Travels in the Ionian Isles, Albania, Thessaly, Macedonia etc. during 1812 and
1813 (1814) and
Recollections of Past Life (1872). His
second wife, Saba, was the daughter of Sydney Smith.
Leonard Horner (1785-1864)
Scottish geologist, brother of Francis Horner; he was educated at Edinburgh University
and was secretary of the Geological Society (1810) and fellow of the Royal Society
(1813).
George Howard, sixth earl of Carlisle (1773-1848)
Son of the fifth earl (d. 1825); he was educated at Eton and Christ Church, Oxford, wrote
for the
Anti-Jacobin, and was MP for Morpeth (1795-1806) and
Cumberland (1806-28).
David Jardine (1794-1860)
The son of a Unitarian minister, he was educated at Glasgow University and practised law
before becoming a police magistrate at Bow Street (1839).
Thomas Francis Kennedy (1788-1879)
Educated at Harrow (where he was a contemporary of Byron) and Edinburgh University, he
was a Whig MP for Ayr (1818-34) who married the daughter of Sir Samuel Romilly and was a
friend of Francis Jeffrey.
George Long (1800-1879)
After education at Trinity College, Cambridge, he was professor of classical languages at
the University of Virginia (1824-28) and University College, London (1828-31,
1842-46).
Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834)
English political economist educated at Jesus College, Cambridge; he was author of
An Essay on the Principles of Population (1798; 1803).
Daniel Maude (1801-1874)
The son of Francis Maude of Yorkshire, he was educated at Caius College, Cambridge and
Gray's Inn; he was magistrate for Manchester (1838-60) and Greenwich (1860-74).
James Mill (1773-1836)
English political philosopher allied with the radical Joseph Hume; he was the father of
John Stuart Mill.
Sir Francis Palgrave (1788-1861)
Barrister, medieval historian, and writer for the
Quarterly
Review; he was keeper of her majesty's records, 1838-61.
Joseph Parkes (1796-1865)
Tutored by Samuel Parr and educated at Greenwich under Charles Burney, he was a
correspondent of Jeremy Bentham who pursued a career as an election agent and political
reformer.
George Peacock (1791-1858)
Educated at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he was tutor and professor of astronomy
(1836-58); he was appointed dean of Ely in 1839.
Sir George Philips, first baronet (1766-1847)
Textile magnate and Whig MP; in addition to his mills in Staffordshire and Lancashire he
was a trading partner with Richard “Conversation” Sharp. He was created baronet in
1828.
John William Ponsonby, fourth earl of Bessborough (1781-1847)
The son of Frederick Ponsonby, third earl of Bessborough (d. 1844) and elder brother of
Lady Caroline Lamb; he was a Whig MP (1805-34), home secretary (1834-35), and
lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1846-47).
David Ricardo (1772-1823)
English political economist, the author of Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
(1817); he was a Whig MP for Portarlington (1819-23).
Thomas Spring Rice, first Baron Monteagle (1790-1866)
The son of Stephen Edward of Limerick; he was educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and
was MP for Limerick City (1820-32) and Cambridge borough (1832-39). He was chancellor of
the exchequer (1835-39) and contributed to the
Edinburgh
Review.
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).
Charles Romilly (1808-1887)
The son of Sir Samuel Romilly and Anne Garbett; in 1842 he married Georgiana Russell,
daughter of the sixth duke of Bedford.
Edward Romilly (1804-1870)
The third son of Sir Samuel Romilly and Anne Garbett; educated at Bury St Edmunds and
Christ's College, Cambridge, he was M.P. for Ludlow (1832-5) and member of the Board of
Audit (1837-66).
Henry Romilly (1804-1884)
The fourth son of Sir Samuel Romilly and Anne Garbett; educated at Bury St Edmunds and
Christ's College, Cambridge, he was a merchant in Liverpool.
John Romilly, first baron Romilly (1802-1874)
English judge, the son of Sir Samuel Romilly; educated at Trinity College, he was MP for
Bridport (1832-35) and master of the rolls (1851).
Henry Roscoe (1800-1836)
The youngest son of the historian William Roscoe; he was a barrister on the northern
circuit who contributed to the
New Monthly Magazine and published
the standard biography of his father (1833).
John Russell, first earl Russell (1792-1878)
English statesman, son of John Russell sixth duke of Bedford (1766-1839); he was author
of
Essay on the English Constitution (1821) and
Memoirs of the Affairs of Europe (1824) and was Prime Minister (1865-66).
James Scarlett, first baron Abinger (1769-1844)
English barrister and politician educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and the Inner
Temple; he was a Whig MP (1819-34) who served as attorney-general in the Canning and
Wellington ministries.
John Charles Spencer, third earl Spencer (1782-1845)
English politician, son of the second earl (d. 1834); educated at Harrow and Trinity
College, Cambridge, he was Whig MP for Northamptonshire (1806-34) and chancellor of the
exchequer and leader of the lower house under Lord Grey (1830).
Edward Stanley, first Baron Monteagle (1460 c.-1523)
The son of Thomas Stanley, first earl of Derby; fighting under Thomas Howard, earl of
Surrey, he was instrumental in the English victory at Flodden Field.
Edward John Stanley, second baron Stanley (1802-1869)
The son of John Thomas Stanley, first Baron Stanley, educated at Christ Church, Oxford;
he was Whig MP for Hindon (1831), North Cheshire (1832-41, 1847-48), raised to the peerage
as baron Eddisbury (1848), president of the Board of Trade (1855-58) and postmaster-general
(1860-66).
Charles Tennyson-D'Eyncourt (1784-1861)
Educated at St John's College, Cambridge, he was a radical MP for Great Grimsby
(1818-26), Bletchingley (1826-31), Stamford (1831-32), and Lambeth (1832-52). He was the
uncle of the poet.
Charles Pelham Villiers (1802-1898)
The brother of the fourth Earl of Clarendon; educated at St John's College, Cambridge, he
was a liberal MP for Wolverhamptom (1835-98) who championed free trade.
Richard Whately, archbishop of Dublin (1787-1863)
The nephew of the Shakespeare critic Thomas Whately (d. 1772); he was educated at Oriel
College, Oxford where he was professor of political economy (1829-31) and was archbishop of
Dublin (1831-63). A prolific writer, he offered a rationalist defense of
Anglicanism.
Richard Whitcombe (1794-1834)
Barrister of Lincoln's Inn, a cousin and correspondent of Francis Hodgson. He contributed
an article on Greek literature to the
Encyclopaedia
Metropolitana.
Stephen Wolryche (1770-1856)
Of Quatford Lodge, military physician and inspector-general of hospitals; a friend of
Thomas Moore, he attended Lady Holland and the Duke of Bedford.
John Wrottesley, first baron Wrottesley (1771-1841)
After education at Westminster School and military service he was a Whig MP for Lichfield
(1799-1806) and Staffordshire (1823-37); he was raised to the peerage in 1838.