The “Pope” of Holland House
Sir James Mackintosh to John Whishaw, 21 February 1806
Parell, Bombay,
Feb. 21, 1806.
MY DEAR SIR,—During the two last years that have
passed since we met, you are likely to have heard so often of me from our friends
at the “King of Clubs,” that I shall not repeat to you the
272 |
|
From Sir James Mackintosh |
few events which have occurred
to le in that time. Neither shall I speak of the great and terrible news from Ulm
and Cadiz, which is fresh to me at present, but which must be so obsolete before
this reaches you. When I say obsolete, I mean if the apparent destruction of
Austria be not even at that time too terribly felt in England to suffer the memory
of these dreadful calamities to grow faint.
India is at length pacified by a compromise between the system of
Lord Wellesley, to which the present
Governor is inclined, and that of Lord
Cornwallis, which he durst not totally reject. The Province of
Bengal, Oude, Agra, Guzerat, and part of Delhi, with the whole Peninsula from Cape
Cormorin to the Tapty and the frontiers of Berar, are directly or indirectly
subject to England. The country between the Chumbal and the Tapty with the Rajpoot
Principalities is left as a theatre for the ambition and turbulence of Scindia and
Holkar. The Nayr Princes in Malabar and the Polygar Chiefs in the Southern Carnatic
have at length been suppressed, though I fear not without great perfidy and
atrocity. The Sikhs, the Rajpoots, and the two Mahratta chieftains are the only
independent powers in India and without concert, seaports, or European officers
they neither are nor can be formidable. India does not seem to me to contain any
source of danger to the British authority. You can easily guess my opinion of the
means by which this vast Empire has been acquired. I
have been very desirous to know its effects, and perhaps you
will not be displeased to hear the result of my inquiries, which have been
273 |
|
1806 |
extensive, though my own opportunity for observation
has been confined to one journey to Poona. There seems no reason to doubt that this
revolution has been everywhere beneficial to the body of the people, and has
bestowed on them a degree of security to which they and their ancestors in their
most boasted days were strangers. Prejudice against foreigners and conquerors of
different colour, manners, and religion, do, notwithstanding, render our Government
generally unpopular. It seems, indeed, that many Indians prefer the occasional
power of oppressing, even though attended with the chance of being oppressed, to
the inflexible impartiality of equal government which covers them with a constant
shield, but imposes on them a constant curb. They have been so long accustomed to
favour and resentment that they have a disrelish for cold, unbending rules. Long
experience has taught the people of Bengal to feel the value of security. The
British Government is popular in that great Province. Justice is administered and
revenue collected often not within a hundred miles of a soldier. The same thing may
be said of this island, where we have perhaps a dozen Hindoo and Parsee merchants
of fortunes from one to two hundred thousand pounds. That they have made some
progress you will also allow when I tell you that several of them say they would
purchase and cultivate estates in the rich and beautiful, though now almost
deserted, island of Salsette, if it were subject to the Recorder’s Court,
where no man can do what he pleases, but that they did not
wish to risk their money under a Governor who might change his measures as he
thought fit. I have said that our 274 |
|
From Sir James Mackintosh |
Government is beneficial to the body of the people. To
the higher classes, to all those who are candidates for power and greatness, it is
intolerable. With the exception of the few degraded offices at the Courts of the
tributary Princes, the lottery of ambition is shut against them. One able and
versatile Brahmin, who has successively served Hyder, Tippoo, and our Raja,
administers Mysore, it is said, with great success, though not, I believe, without
some instances of severity very repugnant to European usages.
You must not infer from what I have said that our Government,
especially in distant countries or new conquests, is what you or I would call good. I only mean that it is far superior to any Asiatic
Government. In many of the countries of India any European authority is a blessing.
The Mahratta country, for instance, which I lately visited, was a scene of such
constant rapine and civil war, that any change which controlled the freebooting
chiefs must be beneficial. I saw too clearly the marks of general misrule and the
ravages of the recent civil war and famine. Almost all the villages were laid waste
chiefly by Holkar, who is the most perfect
model of a Mahratta warrior; and even at the distance of fifteen months, skeletons
scattered pretty profusely over the fields showed how dreadful the devastation and
famine had been among a people who hold in such extraordinary reverence the rites
of sepulture.
I must say that I also saw some of the good effects of the
control for the first time established among these plunderers. The plains round
Poona, which were appropriated and constantly employed as the
275 |
|
1806 |
encampment of the several chiefs of the Empire, which for a century
were a scene of almost daily bloodshed, have at last been restored to the plough,
and I saw the first corn that perhaps for hundreds of years had grown upon them.
I may as well tell you of two personages whom I saw in my
journey, a martial Brahmin, and an Incarnate God.
The first, a chief of the name of Goda, who came to pay his
respects to me, was one of the sternest and most ferocious-looking barbarians I
ever saw. He was fully armed, mounted on a fierce Candahar horse, and had a deep
scar across his brow from a dangerous wound which he had received in battle about
two years ago. His conversation corresponded with his appearance. He told me that
he hated to live in cities, and loved the life of the field, where alone either
honour or profit was to be got. He has about 3,000 horse, not in his pay (for they
are supported by pillage), but under his command. This gentleman does not well
correspond with the European ideas of a Brahmin. Of the Incarnate God at Chinchore
you must have read in the seventh volume of “Asiatic Researches.” The present incumbent
is a handsome child of eight or nine years old, who could scarce be kept awake to
converse with us. The benefice is a rich one. The pagoda in which he resides is
endowed with lands of which the rents amount to 50,000 rupees (or £6,000) a year,
which remain like a fertile spot in a desert, having been spared by Holkar when he
spread desolation all around. He is an Avatar, or incarnation of Gunnesh (the same
deity
276 |
|
From Sir James Mackintosh |
whom Sir W. Jones labours to identify with Janus). The incarnation has continued for eight
generations in the family, and is itself the eighth of the Avatars of Gunnesh. A
pundit of some learning is employed in teaching Sanscrit and theology to the young
God. I asked what the event of the war in Europe would be. The pundit on the part
of the Deo, or God, answered that the question required consideration. I asked how
a god came to need consideration. The pundit seemed to feel the difficulty, and
defended his master as well as most Doctors of Divinity. He said that an image of
the sun in a vessel of water would be shaken as often as you shook the vessel, but
the sun was unshaken and immovable. In like manner the Deity when incarnate was
necessarily affected by the imperfections of the vehicle. Knowing the almost
unanimous opinion of the pundits when they speak esoterically to be that neither
gods nor men, nor indeed anything else material or spiritual, has real existence,
that all is Maia, or illusion, the effect of the action of
Brimh, the vast one, on himself (whom they call God, but
by whom they mean only to express an infinite energy which produces the infinite
variety of illusive appearances which give a fallacious notion of separate
existence, and make up what is called the universe). I ventured to ask the pundit
in the temple in the presence of his god, and what was more material of a crowd of
votaries, whether the Deo as well as every one else was not Maia. He immediately
and without the least hesitation answered that he was. Gunnesh
and the other gods, even Bramah, Vishnu,
and Siva, were, he said, acknowledged and 277 |
|
1806 |
revered in theology, but in philosophy they must be owned to be mere
Maia. I suppose that this may be the first time that ever a priest made such a
confession in such circumstances. But the pundits never dissemble this opinion,
though my friend at Chinchore seemed at first a little astonished at an European
talking of his secret and philosophical doctrines. I intended to have given you a
short specimen of the morality and public feeling of our English Indians, by an
abridged account of a trial for peculation which I have lately had here. But
Sir Edward Pellew, who convoys our Indiamen
down the coast of Malabar, is so resolutely determined on sailing to-morrow morning
that I must refer you for this politico-juridical history to my letter to G. Wilson. You will then see a whole settlement so
interested in an old rogue of notorious and long-stigmatised character, who with an
office of which the fair, or at least the allowed, profits were £10,000 a year, had
received bribes for the clandestine exportation of grain during the famine, as to
raise the most illiberal and blackguard clamour against me, for having merely done
my duty in preventing the escape of so scandalous a delinquent.
And now, my dear Sir, I am obliged hastily to conclude, but not
without humbly requesting that you will refresh me sometimes by the reason,
knowledge, and liberality of your letters, which I should estimate anywhere as they
deserve, but which I shall indeed value in this vile place. Mention me kindly to
the “King of Clubs” and to all its members; remember me to Scarlett and Creevey. I should be obliged by
278 |
|
From Sir James Mackintosh |
your conveying my best respects and
congratulations on his marriage to Lord King,
whose most excellent pamphlet I
have read twice since I have been here, where we suffer under the same malady, of a
fallen exchange from excessive issue of paper money. I could not read it without
thinking at least, if not exclaiming, “Di Patrii quorum semper
sub numine Troja,” &c.
Lady M. begs her best remembrances to you.
I am, my dear Sir,
Very truly and respectfully
Your faithful friend,
Thomas Creevey (1768-1838)
Whig politician aligned with Charles James Fox and Henry Brougham; he was MP for Thetford
(1802-06, 1807-18) Appleby (1820-26) and Downton (1831-32). He was convicted of libel in
1813.
Hyder Ali (1720 c.-1782)
Ruler of Mysore who fought the British in the Anglo-Mysore Wars.
Sir William Jones [Oriental Jones] (1746-1794)
English poet, jurist, and oriental philologist; he published
Poems,
consisting chiefly of Translations from the Asiatic Languages (1772).
Peter King, seventh baron King (1775-1833)
Whig politician, son of the sixth baron; he was educated at Harrow and Trinity College,
Cambridge before succeeding to the title in 1793. His son William married Ada Byron.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
James Scarlett, first baron Abinger (1769-1844)
English barrister and politician educated at Trinity College, Cambridge and the Inner
Temple; he was a Whig MP (1819-34) who served as attorney-general in the Canning and
Wellington ministries.
Tippoo Sahib (1750-1799)
Son of Hyder Ali and maharajah of Mysore; he fought with the French against Lord
Cornwallis in 1792.
Richard Wellesley, first marquess Wellesley (1760-1842)
The son of Garret Wesley (1735-1781) and elder brother of the Duke of Wellington; he was
Whig MP, Governor-general of Bengal (1797-1805), Foreign Secretary (1809-12), and
Lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1821-28); he was created Marquess Wellesley in 1799.
George Wilson (1751 c.-1816)
Born in Aberdeen and educated at Lincoln's Inn, he was a barrister on the Norfolk Circuit
and close friend of Jeremy Bentham.