LORD  BYRON  and  his  TIMES
Byron
Documents Biography Criticism

The “Pope” of Holland House
John Whishaw to Thomas Smith, 27 November 1816
INTRODUCTION & INDEXES
DOCUMENT INFORMATION
GO TO PAGE NUMBER:

Preface
Contents
Introduction
Chapter I: 1813
Chapter II: 1814
Chapter III: 1815
Chapter IV: 1816
Chapter V: 1817
Chapter VI: 1818
Chapter VII: 1819
Chapter VIII: 1820
Chapter IX: 1821
Chapter X: 1822
Chapter XI: 1824-33
Chapter XII: 1833-35
Chapter XIII: 1806-40
Chapter XIV: Appendix
Creative Commons License

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.
Produced by CATH
 
Nov. 27, 1816.

Lord Byron’s third canto is considered as very inferior to the two former, so is the “Prisoner of Chillon” and the other poems published with it. There are occasional passages of merit and great traits of imagination and genius, but he is very obscure and writes too quick and very incorrectly. He is also become an imitator of the Lake school, and certainly will not find a place among our classic writers.

We are very angry here with Jeffrey for his proscription of Addison, Pope, and Swift in the article on the latter. It is written with great spirit and vigour and exhibits all Jeffrey’s talents, but is wholly deficient in judgment.

Lord Byron’s new poems (both the third canto of “Childe Harold” and the “Prisoner of Chillon”) have sold prodigiously, but the best judges all agree that they are clearly inferior to his former productions.