Astarte: a Fragment of Truth
Theresa Villiers to Lady Byron, 9 May [1816]
Thursday May 9th. [1816].
Your kind letter reached me very safely yesterday—and I sincerely thank you for
it. Whatever steps you take towards the attainment of the objects you have in view will, I have no
doubt, be right, & I can only again repeat that if I can in any degree contribute to either I
shall at all times be most happy (&) ready to comply with your wishes—Nothing can be more
amiable than all your feelings towards poor A. & I trust
the time will come when she will fully appreciate them. Her fever has not yet subsided—and the
wretched condition of her own affairs must and will for a time, prevent all retrospective
recollections turning to good account. Her expressions of conscious innocence to me are certainly
wonderful—but I think I can, under various pre-
201 |
|
ASTARTE |
tences, check intemperate
language to all but myself, where it will do no harm. It is very good of you to enter into any
details with me explanatory of your conduct—I feel I have no possible right to ask them—yet your
confidence almost inclines me to risk being indiscreet. If I am so—send me no answer—but I feel so
sure that you had a good reason for every action, that I wish if possible to be able to assign such
to myself, as well as others, for one thing—namely—your having urged
A. to come to town during your confinement.—This circumstance was mentioned
to me by A. in consequence of her having heard both from the
Wilmots and me that Ld. Byron had allowed
himself to advance opinions publickly wh. could not but create the reports that had been
circulated—& she says “if Ly. B. had ever heard such
reports or if she had not treated them with the contempt they deserved, would she have invited me
to come?” I confess I constantly used this argument myself while she was in Piccadilly &
this makes me perhaps doubly anxious to be set right in this particular.
Nothing could be more natural than your wish for her to remain a few days after you left town under
all the circumstances you mention—Dr. Baillie’s opinion was
entirely suppressed to me—and so have many other things not unnaturally—tho’ alas all this confirms
the recent impression I have received.
The anecdote of your maid is very satisfactory—I never
thought much faith shd. be given to her evidence but this ought to be known. Always believe me very
affectionately yours
Matthew Baillie (1761-1823)
Physician and brother of Joanna Baillie; as successor to the anatomist William Hunter he
treated the pedal deformities of both Walter Scott and Lord Byron.
Hon. Augusta Mary Leigh [née Byron] (1783-1851)
Byron's half-sister; the daughter of Amelia Darcy, Baroness Conyers, she married
Lieutenant-Colonel George Leigh on 17 August 1807.
Hon. Theresa Villiers [née Parker] (1775-1856)
The daughter of John Parker, first baron Boringdon; in 1798 she married George Villiers,
son the first earl of Clarendon. She was related to Byron through Augusta, daughter of
Admiral Byron, who had married a Parker.