Astarte: a Fragment of Truth
Lady Byron to Theresa Villiers, 23 May 1816
Kirkby. May 23. 1816.
I will first state my objections to the plan of a full & immediate
communication—then tell you what will I think effect all the desired ends without risk of any
sort——
“The fever has not yet subsided”—it is perhaps the crisis—and would you
submit to one in a state of delirium or “infatuation” a point of conduct on which
207 |
|
ASTARTE |
all the future welfare of that individual must depend? From all I learn of
her present temper, no result but that of precipitate desperation can be expected. She would defy
accusation till she would force me to what I most deprecate—to countenance
the report, and it could afford me no satisfaction that the effects of her imprudent resentment
should recoil upon herself. A short absence has been said to increase
passion—a long one to exhaust it—and I think this peculiarly true of
dispositions like hers. Any compulsory attempt to divide, has, with every one, the effect of
attaching the feelings more closely, but they may die away if not kept alive by the presence of
their object. I am decidedly of opinion that he will not wish her to follow
him—but were there such a probability, I would use every power to prevent
it—Might she not be driven to this alternative by finding her reputation here even more precarious
than she had imagined?—if she does not know how far he has betrayed her, which I partly doubt from
her anticipations of the Report in a particular quarter, (as I could show
you in a letter of hers to me previous to my father’s proposal of a separation) and from what I
have heard him say to her—I believe you read her motives justly, and I fear that much of the
despair, which I hoped to be the work of returning Conscience, arose from her dread of exposure.
The measure which I propose to take appears to me to unite the following
advantages—that it will make herself acquainted with my real opinions &
feelings, without binding me to avow them publicly, should she be desperate in the first
impulse—that it will nevertheless suspend this terror over her, to be used as her future
dispositions & conduct may render expedient—whilst it leaves her the power of profiting by my
forbearance, without compelling the utterly degrading confession of her own guilt——
I intend then to write to her in substance as follows: [Lady Byron now gives a short résumé of her
letter of June 3rd to Mrs. Leigh which follows this one.—Ed.]
208 |
|
LADY BYRON AND MRS. LEIGH (I) |
I wish to recur once more to my former letters
of which she told you to justify her second visit. As I wrote to her upon condition she should
burn, I am anxious not to avail myself of that circumstance to deny anything she might otherwise
have shown in her defence—My letters certainly expressed both confidence & affection. The only
reason for her visit that I dwelt upon was the possibility of preventing mischief to him—& were
she conscious of a cause why she could not have that power, the whole ground
of my receiving her was taken away—& she could not to herself assign any other. He had
threatened to bring a mistress into the house during my confinement—and to this moment I believe he
would, had she not been there—So that between his actual cruelty—and her seeming kindness I can
scarcely say I had an option. One of the most singular circumstances was this: After his visit for
a week to Six M.—1 (Aug. 31) she wrote to me more than once saying she had
things that might be very material to communicate to me—but would not trust them on paper. When she
came, and I asked what they were—having been most anxious to see her for that reason as well as
others, she made an embarrassed excuse, & had nothing to communicate.
As she had in the summer expressed anxiety about Georgiana’s welfare in case of her death, I promised to give every care in my power
to the welfare of her Child, in such an event. I then wrote to her that though I foresaw a time and
circumstances when her feelings would be estranged from me, this promise would not be affected
thereby. My pecuniary powers are now diminished—my intention, as I told you is the same—With regard
to all this I wish to recall to your mind what I believe I told you—that my reasons might not
convince others as perfectly as they convince myself, because—I have seen & heard, whilst
others must depend not only upon my veracity, but in part on my discernment—and on this account
should you hereafter
209 |
|
ASTARTE |
form an opinion different from mine, I should not think it any injustice to
me, unless you were to condemn me for a conviction to myself
irresistible—
Yours affectly.
P.S.—I will trouble you to communicate my letter to Mr. Wilmot1—He will tell you how he became
unavoidably acquainted with my opinion, though it could not be deposited
with one who deserved more entire confidence.
I say nothing of your kindness—nor of the length of my letter—believing that
you will understand what I suppress.
I do not know what letter of mine can have been shown about, as I never wrote
any on the subject that I did not mean to be private, though I have no doubt it was circulated
with the kindest intentions.
Sir Robert John Wilmot- Horton, third baronet (1784-1841)
Byron's cousin; he was MP for Newcastle under Lyme (1818-30), governor of Ceylon
(1831-37), and was Augusta Leigh's representative at the destruction of Byron's memoir; he
succeeded to his title in 1834.
Hon. Augusta Mary Leigh [née Byron] (1783-1851)
Byron's half-sister; the daughter of Amelia Darcy, Baroness Conyers, she married
Lieutenant-Colonel George Leigh on 17 August 1807.
Hon. Theresa Villiers [née Parker] (1775-1856)
The daughter of John Parker, first baron Boringdon; in 1798 she married George Villiers,
son the first earl of Clarendon. She was related to Byron through Augusta, daughter of
Admiral Byron, who had married a Parker.