Lady Morgan’s Memoirs
Chapter XX
CHAPTER XX.
LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831.
This note from Lady Morgan to
Moore, at the period when there was an Irish
Coercion Bill in prospect, gives a picture of a state of things which we hope is never
likely to return.
Lady Morgan to T. Moore.
Kildare Street, Dublin,
January 2nd, 1831.
Dear Mr. Moore,
I am tempted to put your good
nature at rest, with respect to the refusal of the editorship. Your friend
Crampton (whom I met at dinner
yesterday) has offered to forward a note to you by his packet. So I am tempted
to write. My opinion is, that it would be for the
advantage of literature if periodical publications were
put down for ever. Mr. Crampton and I agreed last night
that we should be inclined to “put on the list of
friends those whom you say have
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 319 |
advised you not to publish your
Life of Lord
Edward, at this most
mal à
propos and inauspicious moment. Ireland is no more the
country you left three months ago than it is
Cochin
China! To judge by the outline and aspect of things, a
connoisseur in revolution (and I am
pas mal in that species of
virtú) all would say we were on the
eve of the worst and most perilous political commotions
one coming from
below, and such elements!
Imagine countless thousands of the lower classes pouring through the streets,
silent, concentrated, worked by a nod, a sign; and this, the day after a
proclamation from the government, forbidding
all
meetings.(!) All other classes are
paralysed; government
is without
one organ to address to public
opinion; not one newspaper in its service—
terrorism the order of the day, and a parliament
dispersed for six weeks at least, and the nation left to
the prayers of the
Archbishop of
Canterbury and the black
Pasto of
Mr. Percival. It is clear that they
know nothing about us in England; by this time, however,
Lord Anglesey has probably
given them a
hint; his reception is a stain
upon the country, which can never be effaced; peace or war (
civil war and extending woes) now lies in the influence of
O’Connell over the passions of the
people; “
to this complexion are we come at
last”
In haste,
Dear Mr. Moore,
Yours truly,
January 26th.—I made a very
agreeable sort of
320 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
Donnybrook fair party on Friday
last,—20th. My women were all pretty, and my men all pleasant, and
pour comble we got up a
proverb
en action, in very good
style, all
à l’improviste,
and though almost strangers to each other in this line, they were acted
à merveille.
The proverb—“Poverty comes in at the door,
love flies out at the window.”
What shouts of laughter and fun!—our
audience—Lord Douro, Lord Headford, Sir
Guy and Lady Campbell,
Sir E. and Lady Blakeney, Augustus
Liddle, Colonel Bowater, Lord F. Paulet, Mrs. Caulfield, Miss Armitt, and
Miss Crampton.
Had a letter to-day from David, the sculptor, sending me my own bust in marble, and that
of Lafayette!
February 15th.—Sitting all
alone to-day; just before dinner enter T.
Moore! pardi! I could
not believe my eyes. “Why, what on earth brings you here? is it to
dine with me to-day?” “No, I’ll dine with you
to-morrow.” “My mother was dying, I was sent for, she has seen me, and has
revived.” Morgan came
in. Moore sat all the time; I never before saw him sit for
ten minutes together; he was cordial, and pleasant, and confidential. He told
us many strange things. Poor fellow, he has never been able to get out of debt.
He told us Rogers had expended three
thousand pounds on the publication of his dandy book. Oh, these amateur authors
who write for fashion, while we write for fame or famine!
Moore says he thinks Murray would like to publish for me.
|
LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. |
321 |
February 17th.—I had a
little dinner got up in a hurry for Moore, yesterday; it was got up thus. I threw up my windows,
and asked the inmates of the cabs and carriages of my friends as they passed
the windows, and sent out some penny porters, and lighted up my rooms.
Moore was absolutely astounded when he saw my party!
He sang some of his most beautiful songs in his most delightful manner, without
stopping; some of them twice over, and all of them as if every word was
applicable to the people around him. Many of his old friends were around him; I
said, “if you stay a day or two longer, I’ll do better than
this.” “No, no,” he said, “never
again can such a thing be done. This is one of the few happy accidents
which occur rarely; besides, I don’t want to efface the impression
even by something better.’
I never saw him more natural or agreeable. He praised
Murray to the skies, and said he was
princely in his conduct to authors. Moore disliked me in my youth; he told me at Florence that he
thought Byron did not wish to know me, and did wish to know
Morgan.
April 1st.—Poor Molly! I went to see her, and the whole was too
much for me—my dear Morgan just
returned from her—we are with her every day! What a scene! her whole
anxiety is about her funeral, her coffin, &c. I have promised her to do
all, and now she is at peace, although her drunken sister (who is looking
forward to a glorious wake) has brought her priest, who told her she could not
be saved. My
322 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
sister is all goodness to her, and nurses
her like a mother!
Morgan and I have just had a battle royal! The subject was, as usual, one of my
improvements in the house. All, however, of my improvements have been made at
long intervals; the last I
was five years working at. The present point at issue is, I want a little greenhouse to put my plants in
on the open space at the back of the stairs; I want this
done, and have offered to pay for it. Morgan vows I never
shall have it, and is gone out in a passion; but I don’t despair. Upon
this occasion I am a bore, and he is—a bear.
Mrs. Hemans had at this period settled in Dublin.
Friendly acquaintance and interchange of well disposed civilities went on between herself
and Lady Morgan, in spite of the differences of their
habits, for Mrs. Hemans was then an invalid, and inclined to withdraw
from general society, in which Lady Morgan found her element. These
distinguished women regarded each other with high consideration.
From Mrs. Hemans to Lady
Morgan.
Upper Bagot Street,
May 7th.
Mrs. Hemans presents her compliments to
Lady Morgan, and returns the
“Metropolitan,” with many thanks for all the pleasure
it has afforded her. She trusts that her little messengers may be able to bring
her an improved account of Lady Morgan’s health,
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 323 |
and that the particulars of the
Macaw’s débût in fashionable life will not be long
withheld.
This Macaw was the pet of Lady Cork and
Orrery, and Lady Morgan was writing a jeu d’esprit, called Memoir of a Macaw of a Lady of
Quality.
A letter marked private has always an attraction; the present note
from Sheil is about public affairs, and though time
has deprived them of all the uncertainty that gave them their emphasis, at the moment it is
interesting to see events as they pass in incidents day by day. Lady Morgan was always deeply in earnest about politics. Parties were
running fearfully high upon the Reform Bill.
R. Sheil to Lady Morgan.
Tuesday, July, 1831.
My dear Lady Morgan,
Your letter to me is most gratifying; it is another and
a greener leaf in my parliamentary chapter, a thousand thanks to your good
heart. Believe me you mistake me much if you try me by my observance of the
rules of etiquette; I know how to value your faculties and your character.
There is no one whose friendship and praise I prize more than yours and
Sir Charles’s. I have received
a series of kindnesses from both, which I cannot readily forget.
There is no news here in the political circles to which
I can give implicit confidence. It is said that
324 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
there are dissensions in the cabinet, and that the
king has had a fit of apoplexy. Party
runs so high that I can attach no credit to what I hear, even from the highest
quarters on both sides. I believe that there has been a great defection among
the Lords, but that it is quite possible that some of the ministers may
ultimately become terrified at their own reform.
Lord
Melbourne was great.
Charles
Grant did not speak with the cordiality of strong conviction.
Lady Cork was last night making special
inquiries about you; she asked me whether it was true that you were writing the
adventures and observations of her Macaw. It lately bit off the toe of a
countess, but on the calf of a minister it could make no impression.
I met Jeffery and
Macaulay here at dinner;
Jeffery has the most astounding volubility I ever
witnessed; he will not do in the house, I fear. I witnessed at Sir J. Mackintosh’s his introduction to
Wordsworth, for the first time. The latter grinned horribly, a ghastly
smile.
Remember me to Sir
Charles, and believe me,
Yours most truly,
August 13th.—We are invited
to the regatta; but we shall go to Lucan instead [Lucan was a watering place
near Dublin, fashionable, and much frequented at that time] to repose from
country house dissipations, and then I shall set to work at my Irish histories.
My dirty house is to be given up to workmen, and I
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 325 |
am to
have a French window at the head of the stairs, opening on the balcony; the
greenhouse question is still laid on the table, but I will have that too before
I die, but not long before, I fear.
The review mentioned by Lord
Anglesea in the ensuing letter was an Irish one, written to serve some
question of the moment; the times, both in England and Ireland, were threatening, and every
small contribution of common sense was thankfully received by those who had the guidance of
public affairs.
Lord Anglesea to Lady
Morgan.
Black Rock,
September, 12, 1831.
My dear Lady Morgan,
I ought to have thanked you sooner for the Review you
sent me, and for calling my attention to the well-written article in it by
Sir Charles Morgan. I had already
seen extracts from it, with which, to be honest, I was
better pleased than with the whole, for it happens that
I go the full length with him in what I had before met with, whereas, in part
of that which was new to me, I differ. I am sorry—you, probably,
glad—that I have not time to explain myself.
Lady Anglesea showed me your note
regarding an Italian opera, in Dublin, during October and November. If the
thing is likely to take, I shall be delighted to promote it, and all my family
will join. I think every encouragement should be given to those who
326 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
will render Dublin gay. We want a little
dégourdissement, because too much
entangled in sombre politics. We may be vastly good patriots, and yet be always
lively and good humoured; but before Messrs.
Calcraft and
de Begnis
embark in this undertaking, they should well calculate their means.
Believe, me,
Dear Lady Morgan,
Very faithfully yours,
October 1st.—I thought the
child’s ball, at the Stanley’s, a triste affair, or the contrast with
Lady Emily’s child’s ball
made it appear more so.
They were very civil; and Mr.
Stanley seemed as if he wished to be as unlike a minister of state at a child’s ball as possible;
he ran about and was even frisky, and at the ponderous supper (where there was
a smoking sirloin of beef at the head, and a cold round at the foot, two
turkeys and ducks at the side); he kept crying, “Why don’t you
eat; pray eat,” as if he was feeding the poor Irish at a soup
kitchen.
October 16th.—On my return
from Lucan, I find mon bon ami the
black volume, my journal white or blue, and unwritten still, on the writing
desk in my dressing-room; there it has lain for a month, and it actually
requires an effort of will to open and scribble in it. My life at Lucan was an
odd one, I was placed in a set I never was in before, such a place is the
mutual rendezvous of quizzeries of all sorts, and I should have died of it, but
for my Dominican monk, Father
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 327 |
Fitzgerald, of Carlow (of whom and our romance more
hereafter), and his friend the head of the Dominicans, Father
Harold, and our own odd, clever, paradoxical friend,
Professor Macartney. We made a delightful little
coterie, and all the mediocrities were frightened out of their stupid wits.
Holy St. Francis! what a conclave in the midst of their
sanctity! for they were all saints, and vulgar saints. My arrival caused
universal dismay. Miss M——, the
archbishop’s daughter, ran away, others were about to follow her, but I
tamed them all. No
Lady Huntingdon, had she
dropped among them, could have been more in the odour of sanctified popularity
than I was, after a while, and my life there was, in some respects, most
delectable,—air, health temperance, and occupation. I wrote there my two
most arduous Irish articles for the
Metropolitan. Since our return, we have been
in perpetual agitation about the Reform bill, but I picked one gay,
light-hearted, agreeable evening out of the bustle,—a dinner and
soirée for
Paganini. I asked him, not as a miraculous
fiddle-player, but as a study. He came into the drawing-room in a great coat, a
clumsy walking stick, and his hat in his hand (quite a Penruddock figure), and, walking up to me, made a regular set
speech in his Genoese Italian, which I am convinced was taught him by his
secretario; it abounded in
Donnas
celebritissimas, and all the superlatives of Italian
gallantry. At dinner, he seemed wonderfully occupied with the dishes in
succession, and frequently said, “
ho troppo,
mangiato!” at each dish, exclaiming,
“
bravissimo!
excellmtissimo!” The fact is, I had
328 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
copied a Florentine dinner as closely as I could, having
had a Florentine cook all the time we were in Italy; so, we had a
minestra al vermicelli; maccaroni, in all
forms, &c., &c. I asked him if he were not the happiest man in the
world, every day acquiring so much fame and so much money. He sighed and said,
he should be but for one thing “
i
Ragazzi” the little blackguards that ran after him in
the streets. In the evening, I took him into the boudoir; we had a
tête-a-tête of an hour, in which
he told me his whole story; but in such an odd, simple, Italian, gossiping
manner, half by signs, looks, and inflections of the voice, that though I can
take him off to the life verbally, I can give no idea of him on
paper;—still here is the outline. His father and mother in humble life in
Genoa, fond of music—no more. At four years old, he played the guitar,
and, untaught, attended all the churches to sing, and at seven years of age,
composed something like a cantata; then he took up the violin and made such
progress, that his father travelled about with him from one Italian town to
another, till he attracted the attention and attained the patronage of
Elise Bonaparte, then Grand Duchess of
Tuscany. He was taken into her family, and played constantly at her brilliant
little court; there he fell in love with one of her
dames d’honneur, who turned his head, he said,
and he became
pazzo per amore, and
found his violin expressed his passion better than he could.
Mademoiselle B—— became his guide and
inspiration; but they had a terrible
fracas, they
fought, fell out and separated. One day, in his despair, he was confi-
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 329 |
ding his misery to his beloved violin, and made it repeat
the quarrel just as it happened; he almost made it articulate the very words,
and in the midst of this singular colloquy, Mademoiselle de
B—— rushed into the room and threw her arms round
his neck and said, “Paganini, your genius has
conquered;” their reconciliation followed, and she begged he would note
down those inspirations of love; he did so, and called it,
Il Concerto d’Amore. Having left
it by accident on the piano of the grand duchess, she saw, and commanded him to
play it; he did so, and the dialogue of the two strings had a wonderful
success. He married afterwards a chorus singer at Trieste, and she was the
mother of his little Paganini, whom he doated on. The
mother, he said, abandoned them both, and that he was now no longer susceptible
of the charms of the “
Belle
Donne.” His violin was his mistress. While telling me
all this, he rolled his eyes in a most extraordinary way, and assumed a look
that it is impossible to define—really and truly something demoniacal.
Still, he seems to me, to be a stupified and almost idiotic creature.
Here is a letter from the Countess of Cork and
Orrery, still harping on her macaw.
Lady Cork to Lady Morgan.
Tunbridge Wells,
October 25.
It is actually nine months since I received a letter
from dear Lady Morgan. I immediately
conceived a
330 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
letter of thanks, but never had it in my
power to bring it to light. Lucina is not
at hand, nor any other friendly assistant.
The bantling with bright thoughts is quite decayed, and
I remain your stupid old eighty-six, without a second idea.
I should not venture to intrude upon you to-day; but
that I really am anxious to be regaled with one of your pretty greetings.
Tommy Moore told me my macaw had
spoke both witty and clever. Bulwer,
&c., &c., said the same, and that they would send it to me. I have
never seen it. When can I hear of it—answer this, and tell me, when you
come to England. I don’t wish it till April, when I promise you constant,
pleasant reunions. I am more chez
moi, and go out less than ever. I collect pleasant people, and
like this last act of the play as well as any part of my life. I am in good
health, and have many kind friends, among whom I trust you’ll allow me to
set you down in the first class.
For I am, very truly,
Your faithful and obliged servant,
M. C. O.
A true Whig.
PS. You must write some beautiful panegyric on my
sweet friends, Miss Foleys.
This macaw, which has been several times alluded to, who spoke both
witty and clever, was a bird of wisdom belonging to Lady
Cork, and Lady Morgan wrote a charming
paper entitled Memoirs of a
Macaw
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 331 |
of a Lady of Quality, which first appeared in the New Monthly, and afterwards was
republished in The Book without
a Name. It is a model for the kind of writing; it is full of good
feeling, and has caustic, lively touches of society which give a pleasant sharpness; and
there is a sketch of a poor “Younger Brother,” that is quite touching;
altogether, it is one of Lady Morgan’s happiest efforts.
October 30.—In that coarse, dashing, but not
altogether ill-written novel the Staff Officer, there is a picture from the
life of my dear old friend Joe Atkinson.
The author wrote me a fine letter under the signature Oliver
Moore, presenting me his book and saying lots of civil things.
This moment the news came in that our excellent friend,
Wallace, is returned at last for
Drogheda. I worked hard at this, and wrote to all whom I thought could or could
not, assist him. Poor Wallace is very ill, and got his
fever at his odious election.
November 2.—My poor dear old friend, Hamilton Rowan, is fast going; Morgan saw him the day before yesterday, lying
in his chaise-lounge, feeble, but still full of spirit and interest in the
passing events.
November 7.—The cholera is approaching. I proposed
to Morgan that we should retire from
Dublin; he stopped me short by saying, that where there was most danger that
was his post. His view of the case changed my whole feeling on the subject; he
must stay, and, therefore, I will stay, so last night we
set about thinking what was wisest and best to be done
332 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
for the preservation of the poor prisoners of the Marshalsea. We think we have
succeeded. He has gone to examine the state of the prison, and then to make his
proposals to the
Lord Lieutenant.
A letter from one of the horse-riders of the Royal
Arena, to beg I will command his benefit and give him my name; of course I
refused. How people mistake my energy for influence!
November 14.—Yesterday was a day of offerings.
Robertson presented me with a good miniature of
myself. It is a nice picture; but much thinner, graver, and more sharp and
collet monté than I ever
was, or ever shall be secula
seculorum. Offering the second—A fine bronze medal of
Walter Scott, brought me from Edinburgh.
Third—a brace of superb pheasants from Capt.
Jekyll, of the Grenadier Guards. Lady Elizabeth Clements and Mrs.
Caulfield have just walked in with a present of twelve yards of
white satin, embroidered in flowers by the late Countess of Charlemont for a court-dress. They made me swear
that I would act a proverbe for them
in it some evening. This is the fun of the thing—the philosophy of it is
the embroidery; it must have taken a life to do, and is a fine illustration of
the life to which ladies of quality were put to formerly to get rid of their
time. I have been thinking to what use I can put it—as curtains for the
boudoir it would have no effect, except that of soiled, flowered linen.
Draperies of white satin, embroidered in flowers, sounds “sweetly”
in a novel; but for effect, masses both in colour and material, an adaptation
of light and shades are the things; thus, some fifty yards
| LAST YEARS IN DUBLIN—1831. | 333 |
of scarlet or rose-coloured moreen, at two or three shillings a yard, would
have more effect than all the embroidered satins in the world. Furniture should
be rich, simple, voluminous, and capable of falling, or rather melting, into
deep folds; the effect of the rich masses and lights and shades produced by a
drapery of this texture is surprising. I think I shall make a
douilliette for my French bed, dye it green and stuff it with eider
down.
November 27.—All the early part of the day
house-keeping, looking over table-cloths, cutting out dusters, and what not of
the huckaback order.
Prince Pucklau Muskau’sbook just come! I am properly
trotted out in it. It is too horrible to think there is no doing good without
paying the penalty. The prince’s book, the Prince of Darkness, I should
say, if it did not bear the name and impress of the Prince Pucklau
Muskau. At the very time we were showing him hospitality, he was
concocting this book, in which I was to be misrepresented and belied. The
conversations he describes, was utterly false. I never again ought to receive a
foreigner into my house; this is the fourth time I have been the subject of
attacks written by such guests. It is rather curious that at this particular
moment another foreigner should be presented to me, Count Charles
O’Haggerty, écuyer to the duchess of
Angoulême, at Holyrood; but I am sick and weary of it all.
December 20.—I cannot endure the sight of this
book (my diary), I have nothing but botherations to enter. But what a glorious
triumph! The Reform
334 | LADY MORGAN'S MEMOIR. | |
Bill passing through the House, two
to one against the Tories.
December 25.—Christmas-day, my birthday.
Hélas!!
December 26.—Yesterday I dined with my own dear
family; what a cluster of clever, handsome and beloved heads!
To-day, off to Malahide Castle, where we spend our
Christmas.
Joseph Atkinson (1743-1818)
Irish playwright educated at educated at Trinity College, Dublin; he was a friend of
Thomas Moore and Lady Morgan.
Giuseppe de Begnis (1793-1849)
Italian bass who made his English debut in London at the King’s Theatre in 1821.
Sir Edward Blakeney (1778-1868)
Military officer who fought in the Peninsular Campaign and at the battle of New Orleans
and was commander-in-chief in Ireland (1836-55).
Lady Maria Blakeney (1789 c.-1866)
The daughter of Colonel Thomas Gardiner of the East India Company; in 1814 she married
Field Marshall Sir Edward Blakeney.
Sir Guy Campbell, first baronet (1786-1849)
The son of Lieutenant-General Colin Campbell; he fought at Corunna, in the Peninsular
Campaigne, and at Waterloo. He was deputy quartermaster-general in Ireland,
(1830-41).
Lady Pamela Campbell [née FitzGerald] (d. 1869)
The daughter of the Irish nationalist Lord Edward FitzGerald; in 1818 she married Sir Guy
Campbell, deputy quartermaster-general in Ireland.
Molly Cane (d. 1831)
The devoted nurse and housemaid who raised Sydney and Olivia Owenson.
John William Cole (d. 1870)
Adopting the stage name of Calcraft, he was manager of the Theatre Royal in Dublin
(1830-51) and biographer and secretary of Charles Kean.
Sir Philip Crampton, first baronet (1777-1858)
He was surgeon-general to the forces in Ireland, elected to the Royal Society in 1812;
Lady Morgan described him as an accomplished dancer of the Irish Jig.
Charles Grant, baron Glenelg (1778-1866)
Educated at Magdalene College, Cambridge, and Lincoln's Inn, he was a member of the
Speculative Society, MP, Irish chief secretary (1818), and colonial secretary (1835),
created Baron Glenelg in 1835.
Felicia Dorothea Hemans [née Browne] (1793-1835)
English poet; author of
Tales, and Historic Scenes (1819),
Records of Woman (1828), and other volumes. She was much in demand
as a contributor to the literary annuals.
William Howley, archbishop of Canterbury (1766-1848)
Educated at Winchester and New College, Oxford, he was regius professor of Divinity
(1809-13), bishop of London (1813-28), and archbishop of Canterbury (1828-48).
Francis Jeffrey, Lord Jeffrey (1773-1850)
Scottish barrister, Whig MP, and co-founder and editor of the
Edinburgh
Review (1802-29). As a reviewer he was the implacable foe of the Lake School of
poetry.
William Lamb, second viscount Melbourne (1779-1848)
English statesman, the son of Lady Melbourne (possibly by the third earl of Egremont) and
husband of Lady Caroline Lamb; he was a Whig MP, prime minister (1834-41), and counsellor
to Queen Victoria.
Sir James Mackintosh (1765-1832)
Scottish philosopher and man of letters who defended the French Revolution in
Vindiciae Gallicae (1791); he was Recorder of Bombay (1803-1812) and
MP for Knaresborough (1819-32).
Thomas Moore (1779-1852)
Irish poet and biographer, author of the
Irish Melodies (1807-34),
The Fudge Family in Paris (1818), and
Lalla
Rookh (1817); he was Byron's close friend and designated biographer.
Sir Thomas Charles Morgan (1780-1843)
English physician and philosophical essayist who married the novelist Sydney Owenson in
1812; he was the author of
Sketches of the Philosophy of Morals
(1822). He corresponded with Cyrus Redding.
John Murray II (1778-1843)
The second John Murray began the
Quarterly Review in 1809 and
published works by Scott, Byron, Austen, Crabbe, and other literary notables.
Daniel O'Connell (1775-1847)
Irish politician, in 1823 he founded the Catholic Association to press for Catholic
emancipation.
Lady Eleanora Paget [née Campbell] (1799 c.-1828)
The daughter of John Campbell of Shawfield and Islay; in 1819 she married Sir Henry
Paget, afterwards second marquess of Anglesey.
Henry William Paget, first marquess of Anglesey (1768-1854)
Originally Bayly, educated at Westminster and Christ Church, Oxford; he was MP
(1790-1810), commander of cavalry under Sir John Moore, lost a leg at Waterloo, and raised
to the peerage 1815; he was lord-lieutenant of Ireland (1828-29, 1830-33).
Lord Frederick Paulet (1810-1871)
The son of Charles Ingoldsby Paulet, thirteenth marquess of Winchester; he was an officer
in the Coldstream Guards.
Spencer Perceval (1762-1812)
English statesman; chancellor of the exchequer (1807), succeeded the Duke of Portland as
prime minister (1809); he was assassinated in the House of Commons.
Samuel Rogers (1763-1855)
English poet, banker, and aesthete, author of the ever-popular
Pleasures of Memory (1792),
Columbus (1810),
Jaqueline (1814), and
Italy (1822-28).
Archibald Hamilton Rowan (1751-1834)
Originally Hamilton; educated at Queen's College, Cambridge, he was a United Irishman who
after imprisonment and pardon spent his later years as a landowner and supporter of
Catholic Emancipation.
Richard Lalor Sheil (1791-1851)
Irish barrister and playwright; author of
Adelaide, or the
Emigrants (1814),
The Apostle (1817), and other tragedies.
He was an Irish MP (1830-50).
Thomas Wallace (1766-1847)
Originally a journeyman weaver, he was educated at Trinity College, Dublin became a
Dublin barrister and Queen's Counsel. He was a friend of Henry Grattan and Lady Morgan and
MP for Drogheda (1831-32) and Carlow (1832-35).
William Wordsworth (1770-1850)
With Coleridge, author of
Lyrical Ballads (1798), Wordsworth
survived his early unpopularity to succeed Robert Southey as poet laureate in 1843.
New Monthly Magazine. (1814-1884). Founded in reaction to the radically-inclined
Monthly Magazine,
the
New Monthly was managed under the proprietorship of Henry
Colburn from 1814 to 1845. It was edited by Thomas Campbell and Cyrus Redding from
1821-1830.