My Friends and Acquaintance
Laman Blanchard VIII
Peter George Patmore, diary entry, 7 May 1838
May 7, 1838.—Dined yesterday at B——’s
* “I weep the more because I weep in vain.” |
|
—a literary party of
ten:—Bell (of the “Atlas”), Jerdan, Blanchard, Leigh Hunt,
Robertson (editor of the
“Westminster
Review”), Villiers,
Wallace, a gentleman whose name I did not hear, and
myself. Better talk than I have heard for some time,—chiefly, however, indeed
almost entirely, from B—— himself and
Hunt. B—— related some capital
things; among others, two new anecdotes about Wellington, which he had heard from his own lips, a few days
before, at a small dinner-party. Both of them related to the friendly feelings
and intercourse that subsisted between the English and the French troops in the
Peninsula, when they were not engaged in actual combat. One related to
Col. Aguilar. Being personally
acquainted with some officers of the French regiment which lay in front of his
own, he had been invited to dine at their quarters, the two regiments being at
the time “observing” each other. Just after dinner, while they were
at the height of enjoying themselves, a messenger came from the Duke to
Col. Aguilar, to move his men backwards a certain
distance, the Duke having observed that they were placed
nearer than he wished to the French regiment; and the messenger of the Duke had
been allowed to pass to the Colonel. The message was read by Col.
A., and he immediately rose to go; and on being pressed to stay
a couple of hours longer, or explain why he could not, he told the French
Colonel the nature of the message he had received from the Duke.
“Oh,” said the French Colonel, “if that’s
all, I’ll manage that for you. I’ll move my men back the distance that the Duke requires, and then yours will be in their right position.”
And he did so.
The other anecdote related more immediately to the Duke himself, and is of great interest and
importance, as his own life or death was involved in it. He had been persuaded
to try a beautiful white charger, which he proceeded to
do, attended by one person only (an orderly, I think B—— said); and, without much thinking where he was riding, he
suddenly came right in front of the French piquet, who, seeing the white charger, and supposing that it was some one of
consequence, and that they were part of a larger
party,
instantly raised their guns and pointed at the Duke. “I thought it was
all over with me,” the Duke said, in relating the anecdote,
“but the man who followed me cried out, ‘Stop, stop;
ce nest rien, ce nest
rien,’—we are not followed by anybody!” The
Frenchmen immediately withdrew their guns, “and my life was
saved,” the Duke added.
B—— then related another story arising out of these
military recollections. When he was at Naples, three or four years ago, he was
introduced personally to the King, who has not an idea in his head but of military matters, and who delights in nothing but in
“playing at soldiers.” And not supposing that it could be deemed
worth while by the people about him to present any foreigners but such as had
distinguished themselves in a military way, he took it
for granted B—— was a military hero, and treated him
accordingly. “You are very young, Mr.
B——,” he said, “were you at Waterloo?”
(Mr. B. was about ten years old when Waterloo was
fought.) “I do not recollect your name in connexion with any
remarkable events,
though I hear you have greatly
distinguished yourself. Are you fond of reviews?* I will give you a review,
if you like; or, perhaps, you would like yourself to review my troops? I
gave your countryman, General Sir Walter
Scott, a review when he was here.”
On hearing this anecdote, Hunt said, “We’ve heard of some one who was said
to have abused the privilege which his countrymen had of being ugly. This
gentleman seems to have abused the privilege which kings have of being
ignorant.”
B—— said some one (at the party where he met the Duke,
whom he described as having been singularly pleasant and communicative) asked
him whether he observed anything in the tactics of Napoleon at Waterloo, the only occasion where he had met him,
which indicated any of that vast superiority which was attributed to his
military talents by many. He said—no, nothing whatever; and he expressed his
distinct opinion that Napoleon was a very clever
commander, but nothing
* His Majesty, we must suppose, did not mean to
pun. |
more; and that his cleverness chiefly consisted in the
way in which he availed himself of the peculiar moral and physical qualities of
the troops he commanded. He added, that by far the cleverest of the French
commanders were Soult and Massena, whom he ranked much above
Napoleon, as generals.
The talk after dinner was chiefly learned—a great deal too much so to be either amusing or clever. It
was begun by ——, who dawdled out some question to
B—— about the mode of pronouncing Greek, by the modern Greeks, who seem to Frenchify it (so to speak), getting rid of all the richness and
grandeur—in other words, all the mouthings of it.
In the course of this conversation, Hunt referred to some of the crotchets
of the Greek and Latin poets, or rather versifiers; and to one in particular,
who wrote a Latin poem, consisting of three hundred lines, every word of which begins (for it is extant, I think he said) with the letter P. He repeated two or three of the
lines. * * *
The talk up-stairs, which formed itself into little committees
of three and four, was very
pleasant and gossiping. And,
towards the end of the evening, there was an admirable talk between
B——, Hunt, and
Blanchard (apropos to a supposed contemporary portrait of Shakspeare), on the
Shakspeare sonnets,—those at least addressed to
Lord Southampton. It was chiefly
carried on by Hunt, who gave an admirable (but somewhat
alarming) account of them, with reference to the
equivocal expressions in which they abound, under the supposition of their
being addressed to a man. B—— seemed to think that there
was no defending them on this point; but Hunt got through
it with extraordinary eloquence and beauty, both of style, of thought, and of
feeling. I never heard him talk nearly so well as he did to-night.
There was also another very interesting discussion, in which
he took a leading part, namely, on the character of Lord Bacon—the bad parts of which he defended nobly and
beautifully, as did B—— also; he (Hunt), however, contending that Bacon
never went beyond the point of being able “to
justify his deeds unto himself;” whereas B—— held
that he stuck at nothing to gain
his worldly ends; but that he was anything but a mean
villain—that he was a great one;—great in the good as
well as the bad sense of the word.
Hunt started a theory about poetry,—that it
was the result of immediate feeling, and nothing else;
that there was no such thing as a poetry of thought.
Thought, he said, was merely the reflection of
feeling—feeling at second hand; and, in illustrating his theory, he went on as
follows, giving it as an instance of the poetry of feeling:—“One of my boys had been out walking, and on his
return he could not get in; for we (meaning all the rest of the family)
were out, and the servant, it appeared, was asleep. At last, he got in—[at
the window, I suppose, for I did not understand exactly how, she being asleep and nobody else at home] and there he found
her, as he said, lying asleep on a sofa, crouched up, looking hot and furious.” This
was what he gave as an instance of the poetry of feeling.
Another little incident I had almost forgotten.
—— and —— were expatiating
together on the bust of Dante, tracing very
learnedly his whole “life and character,” in the lines, hollows,
and marks of his noble countenance—having been all the time tracing the
characteristics of Dante in the
features of Ariosto! The blunder probably occurred from the two busts
having lately changed places. They discovered their own mistake in the midst of
the discussion, and then quietly moved across to the other bust, and made out
the same case in regard to that.
I would have refrained from putting down this little
anecdote, if it were not that I look upon it as a very curious and valuable
instance of the power of the imagination in cases of this nature. In fact, with
a thorough knowledge and an intense perception of any
human character, you rosy fancy you see the traces of it
in almost any face.
Ludovico Ariosto (1474-1533)
Italian poet, author of the epic romance
Orlando Furioso
(1532).
Robert Bell (1800-1867)
Irish journalist and miscellaneous writer educated at Trinity College, Dublin; he was
editor of
The Atlas and edited the English poets in 29 volumes
(1854-57).
Samuel Laman Blanchard (1803-1845)
Essayist, poet, journalist, and editor of the
Monthly Magazine; he
died a suicide. Leigh Hunt and Charles Dickens were among his many literary friends.
Sir George Charles D'Aguilar (1784-1855)
During the Napoleonic Wars he was sent on a military mission to Ali Pasha, pasha of
Yanina; he was afterwards deputy adjutant-general at Dublin and a commander in the Chinese
War (1847).
Dante Alighieri (1265-1321)
Florentine poet, the author of the
Divine Comedy and other
works.
James Henry Leigh Hunt (1784-1859)
English poet, journalist, and man of letters; editor of
The
Examiner and
The Liberal; friend of Byron, Keats, and
Shelley.
William Jerdan (1782-1869)
Scottish journalist who for decades edited the
Literary Gazette;
he was author of
Autobiography (1853) and
Men I
have Known (1866).
André Massena (1758-1817)
Napoleon's field marshall who was defeated by Wellington in the Peninsular
Campaign.
Emperor Napoleon I (1769-1821)
Military leader, First Consul (1799), and Emperor of the French (1804), after his
abdication he was exiled to Elba (1814); after his defeat at Waterloo he was exiled to St.
Helena (1815).
John Robertson (1811-1875)
Educated at the University of Aberdeen, the University of Glasgow, and Lincoln's Inn, he
was a journalist in London who edited the
Westminster Review
(1837-40).
Nicholas Soult (1769-1851)
Marshal of France and commander in the Peninsular War.
Robert Plumer Ward (1765-1846)
Educated at Christ Church, Oxford, and the Inner Temple; he was Tory MP for Cockermouth
(1802-06) and Haslemere (1807-23) and the author of three novels.
The Atlas. (1826-1869). A weekly literary newspaper with a Benthamite bent edited by Robert Stephen Rintoul.
The Westminster Review. (1824-1914). A radically-inclined quarterly founded by James Mill in opposition to the
Edinburgh Review and
Quarterly Review.